| Copyright © 2009. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 23
Summary
If homeland security is understood to be the protection of the U.S.
peoples against extreme, unanticipated threats, it becomes apparent that
the design of an educational counterpart has an extremely broad, multi-
disciplinary, and still-evolving mandate. Accordingly, the committee--
based in large part on discussions at a one-day workshop but also on
further reading and research--proposes that homeland security educa-
tional initiatives contain a small core of content that builds an intellectual
framework for threat assessment and threat management. This framework
can and should be applied to the multiple rich opportunities that exist
within in the context of individual disciplines (undergraduate) and multi-
disciplinary research and training experiences (graduate). In addition,
there are opportunities to encourage executive training for those entrusted
with managing the homeland security strategies of institutions, regions,
and nations.
The present state of experimentation among graduate and under-
graduate programs is seen as a strength rather than a weakness. Neither
workshop attendees nor committee members voiced support for an all-
definitive, all-encompassing "Homeland Security University," or for the
development of independent academic tracks specializing exclusively in
homeland security. Further interaction and feedback between fledgling
programs and the communities they serve should gradually refine aca-
demic definitions and approaches over time to concepts that are enduring
and meaningful. Meanwhile, as concepts, practices, and institutions in
homeland security evolve, the higher education community should con-
tinue to serve its traditional function of promoting debate and productive
social criticism about such directions.
23
OCR for page 24
Representative terms from entire chapter:
american psychological