The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Measuring International Trade on U.S. Highways
the estimates. To support its conclusion, BTS identified a number of data deficiencies and the need to rely on strong assumptions in the models. BTS also concluded that the relationship between diesel fuel data and international trade traffic carried by highway was not sufficiently strong to adequately differentiate between states in modeling ton-miles or value-miles of international trade traffic. The BTS report included some suggestions on how to address the various data deficiencies, including the introduction of new surveys and the possibility of increased access to nonpublic or currently protected public data sources.
The panel agrees in general with all of the major findings and conclusions in the BTS study:
The panel concurs with the central conclusion that the present state of available freight data does not permit determination of international trade traffic by state.
The panel concurs that the untested assumptions relied on by the various models used to calculate the estimates are unlikely to be valid and therefore the resulting estimates are of unknown accuracy.
The panel concurs that using diesel fuel data to model ton-miles and value-miles of international trade traffic by highway at the state level is unlikely to produce sufficiently reliable estimates for forecasting highway use.
In terms of the underlying purpose of the BTS study, the panel questions the use of value-miles as a useful measure in addition to ton-miles. The panel also questions the separation of estimates of domestic and international trade traffic as being inconsistent with the objective of allocating funds to address needed maintenance for and new construction of the nation’s highways. The panel was limited in its evaluation of the utility of the estimates of ton-miles and value-miles for purposes of fund allocation given that such an evaluation necessarily depends on the application with respect to a specific formula, and to date, no formula has been proposed for this purpose.
The panel examined the advantages and disadvantages of various possibilities for additional data collection, including new surveys, additional data collected from administrative records, greater access to existing records, and passive means for data collection using new technologies. Several of these hold promise for both near-term and long-term improvement of the measurement of ton-miles of international trade traffic, but none can now provide reliable estimates of such traffic by state.