Items in cart [1] Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK + PDF your price: $42.50 add to cart PAPERBACK list:$36.00 Web:$32.40 add to cart PDF BOOK your price: $28.00 add to cart PDF CHAPTERS your price: $3.80 select Rights & Permissions Free Resources Display this book on your site! Related Titles SBIR Program Diversity and Assessment Challenges: Report of a Symposium SBIR and the Phase III Challenge of Commercialization: Report of a Symposium Other Related Titles Partnering Against Terrorism: Summary of a Workshop (2005) Board on Science, Technology, and Economic Policy (STEP) Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web. Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book. Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic. Page 114   E-mail  Facebook  Digg  Stumble  Twitter More The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy. Closing Remarks Gordon Moore Intel Corporation Dr. Moore reiterated that STEP had been looking at public-private partnerships for more than four years, and that some of them had worked well. He thanked some of the people who had made that four-year survey possible, including the key financial supporters, the NRC staff, headed by Chuck Wessner, the STEP board itself, and the GIP Committee, especially his vice-chair Bill Spencer. He asked to remind the workshop of one perspective that should not be forgotten, which are “some deep partnerships between government and industry that are implicit rather than explicit.” These kinds of partnerships, he said, were responsible for such achievements as creating an environment in which innovation can take place and be exploited. They had also promoted education and training, regulation, and the laws that govern how organizations behave, such as anti-trust laws and intellectual property laws. In addition, the structures of taxation, fiscal policy, and monetary policy also formed a kind of partnership that had made the United States the most productive place in the world to create technological innovations and transfer their value to the marketplace. He closed the workshop by thanking all panel participants for their presentations, and for demonstrating the ongoing importance of partnerships to the complex public issues of the day. “It’s nice to see,” he said in conclusion, “that our work is applicable to this major new problem area that the nation is forced to consider.” Page 114 Front Matter (R1-R18) I. Introduction (1-20) II. Proceedings: Welcome and Introduction (21-27) Panel I: Partnering to Meet the New Security Challenge (28-37) Panel II: Best Practice Examples of Public-Private Partnerships (38-65) Panel III: Partnerships Against Bioterrorism (66-86) Panel IV: Partnering for National Security (87-108) Panel V: Roundtable on Partnering for National Missions: Defense, Health and Energy 109 (109-113) Closing Remarks (114-114) Appendix A: Biographies of Speakers (115-131) Appendix B: Participants List (132-137) Appendix C: Bibliography (138-146)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 114
Partnering Against Terrorism: Summary of a Workshop Closing Remarks Gordon Moore Intel Corporation Dr. Moore reiterated that STEP had been looking at public-private partnerships for more than four years, and that some of them had worked well. He thanked some of the people who had made that four-year survey possible, including the key financial supporters, the NRC staff, headed by Chuck Wessner, the STEP board itself, and the GIP Committee, especially his vice-chair Bill Spencer. He asked to remind the workshop of one perspective that should not be forgotten, which are “some deep partnerships between government and industry that are implicit rather than explicit.” These kinds of partnerships, he said, were responsible for such achievements as creating an environment in which innovation can take place and be exploited. They had also promoted education and training, regulation, and the laws that govern how organizations behave, such as anti-trust laws and intellectual property laws. In addition, the structures of taxation, fiscal policy, and monetary policy also formed a kind of partnership that had made the United States the most productive place in the world to create technological innovations and transfer their value to the marketplace. He closed the workshop by thanking all panel participants for their presentations, and for demonstrating the ongoing importance of partnerships to the complex public issues of the day. “It’s nice to see,” he said in conclusion, “that our work is applicable to this major new problem area that the nation is forced to consider.”