National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$37.75
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Strengthening U.S-Russian Cooperation on Nuclear Nonproliferation (2005)
Development, Security, and Cooperation (DSC)

Citation Manager

. "Conclusion: The End of the Beginning." Strengthening U.S-Russian Cooperation on Nuclear Nonproliferation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2005.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
33
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Strengthening U.S.-Russian Cooperation on Nuclear Nonproliferation: Recommendations for Action

Conclusion: The End of the Beginning

This study suggests that the Cooperative Threat Reduction program and other measures undertaken in the first decades after the Cold War to combat nuclear proliferation have been successful in many ways, but that they continue to be faced with serious impediments in their conception and execution. These impediments, many of which were identified in the earlier workshop report, are susceptible to cooperative solutions between the two governments. The report recognizes, however, that cooperative efforts are at a turning point. No longer should or can the Russian Federation be solely the recipient of assistance. It is now able, politically and economically, as well as militarily, to take its place as a true partner of the United States in the effort to contain the proliferation of nuclear weapons in the world.

It is time, therefore, for the two sides to forge a full partnership in this regard. To accomplish this, a two-pronged program is required. First, remaining impediments to existing and contemplated programs of cooperation must be removed or their effects must be diminished. A number of recommendations throughout this report are intended to accomplish this, and this would be a remarkable achievement in itself for the two governments. Second, however, is a long-term approach to the establishment of a true partnership to reduce and eliminate the threat of further proliferation of nuclear devices, the material to construct them, and their delivery systems. Thus, the joint committee recommends that a high-level commission be appointed to develop a strategic vision and a detailed plan for a renewed cooperative effort by true partners to achieve national security goals. Cooperation must evolve from its present client-supplier relationship to a true partnership in which both sides contribute to a successful outcome.

Page
33
Front Matter (R1-R10)
Summary (1-6)
Introduction: From Assistance to Partnership (7-8)
Political Challenges to Cooperation on Nonproliferation (9-14)
Legal Obstacles and Opportunities (15-21)
Program Organization and Management (22-26)
Scientific and Technical Cooperation (27-32)
Conclusion: The End of the Beginning (33-34)
Appendix A Glossary of Acronyms (35-37)
Appendix B Committee Biographies (38-41)
Appendix C Cooperative Threat Reduction Negotiations: Lessons Learned, Susan Koch (42-46)
Appendix D The Experience of Cooperation in Accounting, Control, and Physical Protection of Nuclear Materials Between the Ministry of Defense of Russia and the Department of Energy of the United States, N. N. Yurasov (47-51)
Appendix E Meetings and Discussions (52-53)
Appendix F On Some Issues of Global Security and Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons, L. D. Ryabev (54-59)
Appendix G Analysis of the Legal and Regulatory Environment Governing the Disposition of Nuclear-Powered Submarines: Major Difficulties and Obstacles in Improvement of International Cooperation and Ways to Mitigate or Overcome Them, V. N. Barinov, and A. P. Zotov (60-64)
Appendix H Development of a Strategic Master Plan for Disposition of Decommissioned Russian Nuclear-Powered Fleet and Rehabilitation of Hazardous Radioactive Sites and Facilities of Its Support Infrastructure, S. Antipov, L. Bolshov, and A. Sarkisov (65-80)
Appendix I Overcoming Impediments to Cooperation Between the United States and Russia: Improving Communication During Project Definition, Michael S. Elleman and Wendin D. Smith (81-83)
Appendix J Overcoming Impediments to Cooperation Between the United States and Russia: Elements of Successful Project Preparation, Michael S. Elleman and Wendin D. Smith (84-85)
Appendix K Means and Methods of Overcoming Barriers in Cooperation: Mindset Gap as a Legacy of the Cold War; Cooperation in Exploration and Utilization of Cosmic Space, S. A. Popov (86-90)
Appendix L Radiological Terrorism in the Context of Nonproliferation, R. V. Arutyunyan and V. P. Bilashenko (91-94)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 33
Strengthening U.S.-Russian Cooperation on Nuclear Nonproliferation: Recommendations for Action Conclusion: The End of the Beginning This study suggests that the Cooperative Threat Reduction program and other measures undertaken in the first decades after the Cold War to combat nuclear proliferation have been successful in many ways, but that they continue to be faced with serious impediments in their conception and execution. These impediments, many of which were identified in the earlier workshop report, are susceptible to cooperative solutions between the two governments. The report recognizes, however, that cooperative efforts are at a turning point. No longer should or can the Russian Federation be solely the recipient of assistance. It is now able, politically and economically, as well as militarily, to take its place as a true partner of the United States in the effort to contain the proliferation of nuclear weapons in the world. It is time, therefore, for the two sides to forge a full partnership in this regard. To accomplish this, a two-pronged program is required. First, remaining impediments to existing and contemplated programs of cooperation must be removed or their effects must be diminished. A number of recommendations throughout this report are intended to accomplish this, and this would be a remarkable achievement in itself for the two governments. Second, however, is a long-term approach to the establishment of a true partnership to reduce and eliminate the threat of further proliferation of nuclear devices, the material to construct them, and their delivery systems. Thus, the joint committee recommends that a high-level commission be appointed to develop a strategic vision and a detailed plan for a renewed cooperative effort by true partners to achieve national security goals. Cooperation must evolve from its present client-supplier relationship to a true partnership in which both sides contribute to a successful outcome.

OCR for page 34
Strengthening U.S.-Russian Cooperation on Nuclear Nonproliferation: Recommendations for Action This page intentionally left blank.

Representative terms from entire chapter:

existtion program