The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Improving Breast Imaging Quality Standards
Warren-Burhenne L. 2003. Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia standardized test for screening radiologists. Seminars in Breast Disease 6(3):140–147.
Warren-Burhenne LJ, Wood SA, D’Orsi CJ, Feig SA, Kopans DB, O’Shaughnessy KF, Sickles EA, Tabar L, Vyborny CJ, Castellino RA. 2000. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 215(2):554–562.
Waynant RW, Chakrabarti K, Kaczmarek RA, Dagenais I. 1999. Testing optimum viewing conditions for mammographic image displays. Journal of Digital Imaging 12(2 Suppl 1):209–210.
Weiner JP, Parente ST, Garnick DW, Fowles J, Lawthers AG, Palmer RH. 1995. Variation in office-based quality. A claims-based profile of care provided to Medicare patients with diabetes. JAMA 273(19):1503–1508.
Weiss KB, Wagner R. 2000. Performance measurement through audit, feedback, and profiling as tools for improving clinical care. Chest 118(2 Suppl):53S–58S.
White E, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, Geller BM, Rosenberg RD, Kerlikowske K, Saba L, Vacek PM, Carney PA, Buist DS, Oestreicher N, Barlow W, Ballard-Barbash R, Taplin SH. 2004. Biennial versus annual mammography and the risk of late-stage breast cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 96(24):1832–1839.
Wolk RB. 1992. Hidden costs of mobile mammography: Is subsidization necessary? American Journal of Roentgenology 158(6):1243–1245.
Yankaskas BC, Cleveland RJ, Schell MJ, Kozar R. 2001. Association of recall rates with sensitivity and positive predictive values of screening mammography. American Journal of Roentgenology 177(3):543–549.
Yankaskas BC, Klabunde CN, Ancelle-Park R, Renner G, Wang H, Fracheboud J, Pou G, Bulliard JL. 2004. International comparison of performance measures for screening mammography: Can it be done? Journal of Medical Screening 11(4):187–193.
Yankaskas BC, Taplin SH, Ichikawa L, Geller BM, Rosenberg RD, Carney PA, Kerlikowske K, Ballard-Barbash R, Cutter GR, Barlow WE. 2005. Association between mammography timing and measures of screening performance in the United States. Radiology 234 (2):363–373.
Zapka JG, Taplin SH, Solberg LI, Manos MM. 2003. A framework for improving the quality of cancer care: The case of breast and cervical cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 12(1):4–13.
Zheng Y, Barlow W, Cutter G. 2005. Assessing accuracy of mammography in the presence of verification bias and intrareader correlation. Biometrics 61(1):259–268.