National Academies Press: OpenBook

Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2 (2006)

Chapter: Appendix C: Issues Raised by the Institute for Energy and Environment Research (IEER)

« Previous: Appendix B: Commetary on "Radiation from Medical Procedures in the Pathogenesis of Cancer and Ischemic Heart Disease: Dose-Response Studies with Physicians per 100,000 Populations"
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C: Issues Raised by the Institute for Energy and Environment Research (IEER)." National Research Council. 2006. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11340.
×

C
Issues Raised by the Institute for Energy and Environment Research (IEER)

A letter dated September 3, 1999, and authored by Ms. Lisa Ledwidge and Dr. Arjun Makhijani on behalf of IEER and a number of other signatories requested that the BEIR VII committee address six issues. The committee’s response to these issues follows.

1. Effects of Radionuclides That Cross the Placenta

In Chapter 8 the committee considers post-Chernobyl data on the excess papillary thyroid cancers arising in radio-iodine-exposed children, some of whom received their exposure in utero. With respect to carbon-14 and tritium, brief comments are made in response to issue 3. The committee recommends that this issue be addressed as part of a larger review of maternal exposures in humans that may affect the fetus.

2. Effects of Radiation on Female Fetuses

In Chapters 6 and 7, the committee considers the effects of in utero radiation, including medical radiation and radiation from the atomic bombs. In the recent paper by Delongchamp and colleagues (1997), nine cancer deaths among females exposed in utero to the atomic bombs were noted in comparison to only one among males. Minimal information exists in the medical literature with respect to sex-specific effects, and none reports a gender-specific association between radiation and cancer. Because of the current practice of minimizing radiation exposure to pregnant women, the committee considers it unlikely that this issue will be able to be addressed by future epidemiologic studies.

3. Effects of Organically Bound Radionuclides

Cellular and animal data are available for the development of judgments on the tumorigenic, genetic, and developmental effects of tritiated water and organically bound tritium (Straume 1991; Straume and Carsten 1993). The tritium effects observed do not differ qualitatively from those resulting from external irradiation with X-rays or γ-rays. The evidence available indicates that the relative biological effectiveness of β-irradiation from tritium is generally greater (by two- to threefold) than that of γ-irradiation and similar to or slightly greater (one- to twofold) than X-irradiation. Higher effectiveness is seen in vitro in cellular studies when tritium is incorporated into DNA (e.g., as tritiated thymidine). Although the observed effects of tritium are largely attributable to ionization damage from beta particles, transmutation of incorporated tritium to helium also has the potential to damage DNA (NCRP 1979; Hill and Johnson 1993). However, following ingestion of organically bound tritium (OBT, including tritiated thymidine) the in vivo activity of digestive metabolic processes means that only a very small fraction of tritium is incorporated into cellular DNA. Thus, the predominant in vivo source of DNA damage from OBT is β-particle ionization, not transmutation. The observed in vivo effects of tritium will, in any event, include any contribution from transmutational damage to DNA. The same general principles also apply to in vivo effects from organically bound carbon-14.

It is important to point out that the committee was not constituted to review the biokinetic aspects of doses from internal radionuclides such as tritium, carbon-14, strontrium-90, radiocesium, and radioiodine. Nevertheless the BEIR VII committee considered potentially informative epidemiologic data that relate to risks from internal radiation as part of its brief to review risks at low doses of low-LET (linear energy transfer) radiation.

4. Synergistic Effects

This issue has been comprehensively addressed in Annex H of UNSCEAR (2000b). The BEIR committee endorses the recommendations made on page 217 of that report.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix C: Issues Raised by the Institute for Energy and Environment Research (IEER)." National Research Council. 2006. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11340.
×

5. Data Integrity and Quality

This issue is addressed in Chapter 8 on occupational radiation studies. The committee acknowledges that there is imprecision in exposure estimates of all epidemiologic studies, especially in retrospective studies of occupational groups. In general, however, studies of workers exposed to radiation tend to have better exposure data than studies of workers exposed to chemicals because of the concurrent estimation of exposure through the use of radiation badges.

The committee notes that imprecision in the estimation of radiation exposure will tend toward an underestimation of any true association between radiation and health effects. To the extent that models based on these data are utilized to set standards of population exposure, the standards will tend to be lower than those that would be based on completely accurate data.

6. Effects on Various Populations

The atomic bomb data are based on two populations in Japan at one point of time. The relation of radiation exposure to age at exposure and gender has been extensively studied and is summarized in Chapter 6. Data on occupational and medical exposure to radiation are available for a number of populations throughout the world for many decades. However, few details are presented in these studies on age at exposure and sex, except of course for sex-specific studies.

The committee recommends that future studies of populations exposed to ionizing radiation include not only information on factors that may interact with radiation exposure, but also information on possible risks present in persons with varying demographic characteristics.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix C: Issues Raised by the Institute for Energy and Environment Research (IEER)." National Research Council. 2006. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11340.
×
Page 330
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C: Issues Raised by the Institute for Energy and Environment Research (IEER)." National Research Council. 2006. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11340.
×
Page 331
Next: Appendix D: Hormesis »
Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2 Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $66.95
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

BEIR VII develops the most up-to-date and comprehensive risk estimates for cancer and other health effects from exposure to low-level ionizing radiation. It is among the first reports of its kind to include detailed estimates for cancer incidence in addition to cancer mortality. In general, BEIR VII supports previously reported risk estimates for cancer and leukemia, but the availability of new and more extensive data have strengthened confidence in these estimates. A comprehensive review of available biological and biophysical data supports a "linear-no-threshold" (LNT) risk model—that the risk of cancer proceeds in a linear fashion at lower doses without a threshold and that the smallest dose has the potential to cause a small increase in risk to humans. The report is from the Board on Radiation Research Effects that is now part of the newly formed Nuclear and Radiation Studies Board.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!