National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$59.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future (2007)
Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP)

Citation Manager

. "8 What Actions Should America Take in Economic and Technology Policy to Remain Prosperous in the 21st Century?." Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2007.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
195
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future

TABLE 8-1 Overview of R&D Tax Incentives in Other Countries

County

R&D Tax Incentive

Comment

Australia

  • Allows a 125% deduction for R&Dexpenditures

  • Plus a 175% deduction for R&D expenditures exceeding a base amount of prior-year spending.

The 125% deduction is the equivalent of a flat 7.5% R&D tax credit. In discussing its R&D-friendly environment, the Australian government’s website (http://investaustralia.com) concludes, “It’s little surprise then, that many companies from around the world are choosing to locate their R&D facilities in Australia.” The government also points out that “50% of the most innovative companies in Australia are foreign-based.”

Canada

  • Offers a permanent 20% flat (i.e., first-dollar) R&D tax credit.

  • Also, many provincial governments offer various incentives (e.g., refundable credits) for R&D activities conducted in their provinces.

In 2003, US subsidiaries spent $2.5 billion on R&D in Canada, which has mounted an aggressive marketing campaign, including television and print advertisements, to lure more US companies to locate R&D operations north of the border. An Ontario print ad discusses “R&D tax credits, among the most generous in the industrialized world” and “a cost structure which KPMG confirms as lower than the U.S. and Europe”; the ad concludes, “You’ll see why R&D in Ontario is clearly worth investigating.”

China

  • Offers foreign investment enterprises a 150% deduction for R&D expenditures, provided that R&D spending has increased by 10% from the prior year.

The 10% incremental-increase threshold should not be difficult to meet for US-owned companies growing start-up operations in China. China’s Ningbo Economic & Technical Development Zone (“NETD”) invites global companies to “enjoy a number of preferential taxation policies,” as well as other benefits.

France

  • Allows a 50% R&D credit, includes a 5% flat credit and a 45% credit for R&D expenditures in excess of average R&D spending over the two previous years.

As is the case with the China R&D deduction, the incremental threshold governing the French 50% credit should be easy to meet for “inbound” companies growing their operations in France. In 2003, US subsidiaries spent $1.8 billion on R&D in France. “This is the first time in our industry that Americans are coming to Europe to join the R&D of Europeans,” saysPasquale Pastore, President and CEO of STMicroelectronics, in The New France, Where the Smart Money Goes.

India

  • Companies carrying on scientific research and development are entitled to a 100% deduction of profits for 10 years.

“More than 100 global companies … have established R&D centers in India in the past 5 years, and more are coming…. As I see it from my perch in India’s science and technology leadership, if India plays its cards right, it can become by 2020 the world’s number-one knowledge production center,” Raghunath

Page
195
Front Matter (R1-R26)
Executive Summary (1-22)
1 A Disturbing Mosaic (23-40)
2 Why Are Science and Technology Critical to America's Prosperity in the 21st Century? (41-67)
3 How Is America Doing Now in Science and Technology? (68-106)
4 Method (107-111)
5 What Actions Should America Take in K–12 Science and Mathematics Education to Remain Prosperous in the 21st Century? (112-135)
6 What Actions Should America Take in Science and Engineering Research to Remain Prosperous in the 21st Century? (136-161)
7 What Actions Should America Take in Science and Engineering Higher Education to Remain Prosperous in the 21st Century? (162-181)
8 What Actions Should America Take in Economic and Technology Policy to Remain Prosperous in the 21st Century? (182-203)
9 What Might Life in the United States Be Like if It Is Not Competitive in Science and Technology? (204-224)
Appendix A Committee and Professional Staff Biographic Information (225-240)
Appendix B Statement of Task and Congressional Correspondence (241-248)
Appendix C Focus-Group Sessions (249-300)
Appendix D Issue Briefs (301-302)
K–12 Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education (303-324)
Attracting the Most Able US Students to Science and Engineering (325-341)
Undergraduate, Graduate, and Postgraduate Education in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics (342-356)
Implications of Changes in the Financing of Public Higher Education (357-376)
International Students and Researchers in the United States (377-396)
Achieving Balance and Adequacy in Federal Science and Technology Funding (397-414)
The Productivity of Scientific and Technological Research (415-422)
Investing in High-Risk and Breakthrough Research (423-431)
Ensuring That the United States Is at the Forefront in Critical Fields of Science and Technology (432-443)
Understanding Trends in Science and Technology Critical to US Prosperity (444-454)
Ensuring That the United States Has the Best Environment for Innovation (455-472)
Scientific Communication and Security (473-482)
Science and Technology Issues in National and Homeland Security (483-500)
Appendix E Estimated Recommendation Cost Tables (501-512)
Appendix F K–12 Education Recommendations Supplementary Information (513-516)
Appendix G Bibliography (517-536)
Index (537-564)