Cover Image

PAPERBACK
$59.95



View/Hide Left Panel

aside 2.5% of the extramural R&D budgets of the largest federal science agencies for funding R&D by small businesses; it currently runs at over $1 billion per year.2 Table EL-1 shows the overall trend. SBIR encompasses three phases: feasibility, development, and commercialization. SBIR has been reviewed and evaluated a number of times over the course of its existence.3 The National Research Council is currently undertaking a new assessment of the program.4

STTR was established in 1992 to encourage small businesses to partner with research institutions in R&D and commercialization.5

Although there has been debate over the years about the impacts of these programs and the appropriate evaluation metrics, past assessments have been positive overall. Political support also has been very strong, with a number of technical changes having been recommended and enacted over the years.

Possible federal actions to improve and extend these programs include the following:

  • Bridge the funding gap between phase I and phase II awards provided by the SBIR program.6

  • Increase the number of phase II SBIR awards at the expense of phase I awards.7

  • Regularly assess SBIR program results and compare with the Department of Defense (DOD) Fast Track results, and assess the costs and benefits of better integrating SBIR awards in the development of “clusters” around universities and technology parks.8

  • Create a National Institute of Innovation that would provide venture capital for innovative startup companies to smooth the peaks and valleys of private-sector venture-capital flows.9 A similar idea, called the Civil-

2

National Research Council. SBIR: Program Diversity and Assessment Challenges, Report of a Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2004.

3

National Research Council. SBIR: An Assessment of the Department of Defense’s Fast Track Initiative. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000; National Research Council. SBIR: Challenges and Opportunities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999.

4

National Research Council. An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research Program: Project Methodology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2004.

5

US General Accounting Office. “Contributions to and Results of the Small Business Technology Transfer Program.” Statement by Jim Wells. GAO-01-867T. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office, 2001.

6

National Research Council. The Small Business Innovation Research Program: Challenges and Opportunities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999.

7

Ibid.

8

National Research Council, 2000.

9

K. Hughes. “Facing the Global Competitiveness Challenge.” Issues in Science and Technology 21(Summer 2005).



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement