|
Items in cart [4] |
Questions? Call 888-624-8373 |
| Copyright © 2009. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 517
Appendix G
Bibliography
Adelman, C. 1998. Women and Men on the Engineering Path: A Model for Analysis of Under-
graduate Careers. Washington, DC: US Department of Education. Available at http://www.nae.
edu/nae/diversitycom.nsf/98b72da8aad70f1785256da20053deaf/85256cfb00484b5c
85256da000002f83/$FILE/Adelman_Women_and_Men_of_the_Engineering_Path.pdf.
Allen, M. 2003. Eight Questions on Teacher Preparation: What Does the Research Say? Wash-
ington, DC: Education Commission of the States. Available at: http://www.ecs.org/
tpreport/.
Alliance for Science and Technology Research in America. 2004. Basic Research: Investing in
America’s Innovation Future, a presentation for the House Republican High-Tech Work-
ing Group, March 31.
Alphonso, C. 2005. Facing security hurdles, top students flock to Canada. The Globe and
Mail, February 22.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. 2004. Trends in Federal Research by
Discipline, FY 1976-2004. October. Available at: http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd/disc04tb.
pdf and http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd/discip04c.pdf.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. 2005. Historical Data on Federal R&D,
FY 1976-2006. March 22. Available at: http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd/hist06p2.pdf.
American Electronics Association. 2004. Losing the Competitive Advantage? The Challenge
for Science and Technology in the United States. Washington, DC: American Electronics
Association.
American Electronics Association. 2004. Offshore Outsourcing in an Increasingly Competitive
and Rapidly Changing World: A High-Tech Perspective. Washington, DC: American
Electronics Association, March.
Andrews, E. L. 2005. The doctrine was not to have one; Greenspan will leave no road map to
his successor. New York Times, August 26, p. C1.
Arndt, M. 2005. No longer the lab of the world: U.S. chemical plants are closing in droves as
production heads abroad. BusinessWeek, May 2. Available at: http://www.
businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_18/b3931106.htm and http://www.usnews.com/
usnews/biztech/articles/051010/10energy.htm.
517
OCR for page 518
518 RISING ABOVE THE GATHERING STORM
Aslanbeigui, N., and V. Montecinos. 1998. Foreign students in US doctoral Programs. Journal
of Economic Perspectives 12:171-182.
Association of American Universities. 2005. A National Defense Education Act for the 21st
Century. Renewing Our Commitment to US Students, Science, Scholarship, and Society
(White paper). Washington, DC: AAU. Available at: http://www.aau.edu/education/
NDEAOP.pdf.
Association of American Universities, Committee on Graduate Education. 1998. Graduate
Education. Washington, DC: AAU.
Athreye, S. S. 2003. The Indian Software Industry. Carnegie Mellon Software Industry Center
Working Paper 03-04. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, October.
Atkinson, R. 2004. Meeting the Offshoring Challenge. Washington, DC: Progressive Policy
Institute.
Atkinson, R. D. 2004. The Past and Future of America’s Economy: Long Waves of Innovation
That Power Cycles of Growth. Northampton, MA: E. Elgar.
Attewell, P. 2001. The winner take-all high school: Organizational adaptations to educational
stratification. Sociology of Education 74(4):267-296.
Attiyeh, G., and R. Attiyeh. 1997. Testing for bias in graduate school admissions. Journal of
Human Resources 32:524-548.
Auriol, L. Why do we need indicators on careers of doctorate holders? Workshop on User
Needs for Indicators on Careers of Doctorate Holders. Paris: OECD, September 27. Avail-
able at: http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2004doc.nsf.
Austin, C., L. Brady, T. Insel, and F. Collins. 2004. NIH molecular libraries initiative. Science
306:1138-1139.
Autor, D., L. Katz, and M. Kearney. 2005. Trends in U.S. Wage Inequality: Re-Assessing the
Revisionists. Working Paper 11627. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic
Research.
Ayers, W. M. 2002. MIT: The Impact of Innovation. Boston, MA: Bank Boston. Available at:
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/founders/Founders2.pdf.
Babco, E. 2002. Trends in African American and Native American Participation in STEM
Higher Education. Washington, DC: Commission on Professionals in Science and Tech-
nology.
Bar Shalom, A., and R. Cook-Deegan. 2002. Patents and innovation in cancer therapeutics:
Lessons from CellPro. The Milbank Quarterly 80(December):iii-iv, 637-676.
Bardhan, A., and C. Kroll. 2003. The New Wave of Outsourcing. Fisher Center Research
Reports #1103. Berkeley, CA: Fisher Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics, No-
vember 2.
Bauer, P. W. 1999. Are We in a Productivity Boom? Evidence from Multifactor Productivity
Growth. Cleveland, OH: Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, October 15. Available at:
www.clevelandfed.org/research/Com99/1015.pdf, Table 1.
Berkner, L. K., S. Cuccaro-Alamink, and A. C. McCormick. 1996. Descriptive Summary of
1989-90 Beginning Postsecondary Students: 5 Years Later with an Essay on Postsecondary
Persistence and Attainment. NCES 96155. Washington, DC: National Center for Educa-
tion Statistics.
Berliner, D. C., and B. J. Biddle. 1995. The Manufactured Crisis: Myths, Fraud, and the
Attack on America’s Public Schools. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Bhagwati, J., A. Panagariya, and T. N. Srinivasan. 2004. The muddles over outsourcing. Jour-
nal of Economic Perspectives 18(Summer):93-114.
Blasie, C., and G. Palladino. 2005. Implementing the professional development standards: A
research department’s innovative masters degree program for high school chemistry teach-
ers. Journal of Chemical Education 82(4):567-570.
OCR for page 519
519
APPENDIX G
Bogumil, J. 2003. The Brain Drain in an Era of Liberalism. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Bureau for
International Education.
Bonvillian, W. B. 2004. Meeting the new challenge to US economic competitiveness. Issues in
Science and Technology 21(1)(Fall):75-82.
Boskin, M. J., and L. J. Lau. 1992. Capital, Technology, and Economic Growth. In Technol-
ogy and the Wealth of Nations, N. Rosenberg, R. Landau, and D. C. Mowery, eds.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Boylan, M. 2004. Assessing Changes in Student Interest in Engineering Careers Over the Last
Decade. CASEE, National Academy of Engineering. Available at: http://www.nae.edu/
NAE/caseecomnew.nsf/weblinks/NFOY-6GHJ7B/$file/Engineering%20Interest%20-
%20HS%20through%20College_V21.pdf.
Braxton, J. M. 2002. Reworking the Student Departure Puzzle. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt
University Press.
Brown, H. 2004. Council of Graduate Schools Finds Declines in New International Graduate
Student Enrollment for Third Consecutive Year. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate
Schools, November 4.
Bubnoff, A. von. 2005. Asia squeezes Europe’s lead in science. Nature 436(7049)(July 21):314.
Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2006. 2005. Analytical Perspectives.
Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. Available at: http://a255.g.akamaitech.
net/7/255/2422/07feb20051415/www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy06/pdf/spec.pdf.
Building Engineering and Science Talent. 2004. The Talent Imperative. San Diego, CA: BEST.
Building Engineering and Science Talent. 2004. A Bridge for All: Higher Education Design
Principles in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. San Diego, CA: BEST.
Available at: http://www.bestworkforce.com.
Bureau of Industry and Security. 2004. Deemed Export Controls May Not Stop the Transfer
of Sensitive Technology to Foreign Nationals in the U.S. Final Inspection Report No. IPE-
16176. Washington, DC: Office of Inspections and Program Evaluations.
Bush, V. 1945. Science: The Endless Frontier. Washington, DC: US Government Printing
Office.
Bush pushes ubiquitous broadband by 2007. Reuters, March 26, 2004.
Business Roundtable. 2005. Tapping America’s Potential. Washington, DC: Business
Roundtable.
Business Roundtable. 2006. Innovation and U.S. Competitiveness: Addressing the Talent Gap.
Public Opinion Research. Washington, DC: Business Roundtable, January 12. Available
at: http://www.businessroundtable.org/pdf/20060112Two-pager.pdf.
Business-Higher Education Forum. 2005. A Commitment to America’s Future: Responding to
the Crisis in Mathematics and Science Education. Washington, DC: American Council on
Education.
Busquin, P. Investing in people. Science 303:145.
Butts, S., and R. Killoran. 2003. Industry-University Research in Our Times: A White Paper.
Available at: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/guirr/IP_background.html.
Bybee, R. W., and E. Stage. 2005. No country left behind. Issues in Science and Technology.
(Winter):69-75.
Calabrese, M. 2005. Testimony to the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation,
United States Senate, Hearing on Broadcast to Broadband: Completing the Digital Televi-
sion Transition Can Jumpstart Affordable Wireless Broadband, July 12.
Callan, B., S. Costigan, and K. Keller. 1997. Exporting U.S. High Tech: Facts and Fiction
About the Globalization of Industrial R&D. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
Center for Strategic and International Studies. 1996. Global Innovation/National Competi-
tiveness. Washington, DC: CSIS.
OCR for page 520
520 RISING ABOVE THE GATHERING STORM
Center for Strategic and International Studies. 2001. Technology and Security in the 21st
Century: US Military Export Control Reform. Washington, DC: CSIS.
Center for Strategic and International Studies. 2005. Security Controls on Scientific Informa-
tion and the Conduct of Scientific Research. Washington, DC: CSIS, June.
Center for Strategic and International Studies. 2005. Technology Futures and Global Power,
Wealth and Conflict. Washington, DC: CSIS, May, p. viii.
Center for Sustainable Energy Systems. 2005. US Energy System Factsheet. Ann Arbor, MI:
University of Michigan, August.
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. 2005. National Heath Expenditures. Available
at: http://www.cms.hhs.gov/NationalHealthExpendData/downloads/tables.pdf.
Central Intelligence Agency. 2001. Long-Term Global Demographic Trends: Reshaping the
Geopolitical Landscape. Langley, VA: CIA, July, p. 25.
Chelleraj, G., K. E. Maskus, and A. Mattoo. 2004. The Contribution of Skilled Immigration
and International Graduate Students to US Innovation. Working Paper 04-10. Boulder,
CO: University of Colorado.
Clinton, W. J. 1997. Commencement Address at Morgan State University in Baltimore, Mary-
land. Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States, Books I and II. Washington,
DC: Government Printing Office, May 18. Available at: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/
pubpapers/wjclinton.html.
Clotfeltner, C. T., R. G. Ehrenberg, M. Getz, and J. J. Siegfried. 1991. Economic Challenges in
Higher Education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Cochran-Smith, M., and K. M. Zeichner. 2005. Studying Teacher Education. Washington,
DC: American Educational Research Association.
Cohen, D. K., and H. C. Hill. 2000. Instructional policy and classroom performance: The
mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record 102(2):294-343.
Cohen, W. 2001. East Asia at the Center: Four Thousand Years of Engagement with the
World. New York: Columbia University Press.
Cohen, W. M., and S. A. Merrill, eds. 2003. Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy. Wash-
ington, DC: The National Academies Press.
College Board. 2004. Trends in Student Aid 2004. Washington, DC: College Board.
Colvin, G. 2005. Can Americans compete? Is America the world’s 97-lb. weakling? Fortune,
July 25.
Commission on Protecting and Reducing Government Secrecy (the Moynihan Commission).
1997. Secrecy. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Commission on the Future of the United States Aerospace Industry. November 2002. Final
Report. Arlington, VA: Commission on the Future of the United States Aerospace Indus-
try. Available at: www.ita.doc.gov/td/aerospace/aerospacecommission/AeroCommission
FinalReport.pdf.
Committee for Economic Development, Research and Policy Committee, Learning for the
Future. 2003. Changing the Culture of Math and Science Education to Ensure a Com-
petitive Workforce. New York: Committee for Economic Development.
Conference Board of Canada. 1999. The Economic Implications of International Education
for Canada and Nine Comparator Countries: A Comparison of International Education
Activities and Economic Performance. Ottawa: Department of Foreign Affairs and Inter-
national Trade.
Congressional Commission on the Advancement of Women and Minorities in Science, Engi-
neering, and Technology Development. 2000. Land of Plenty: Diversity as America’s
Competitive Edge in Science, Engineering, and Technology. Arlington, VA: National Sci-
ence Foundation.
Consortium for Policy Research in Education. 2002. A Report on the Eighth Year of the
Merck Institute for Science Education. Philadelphia, PA: CPRE, University of Pennsylva-
nia. Available at: http://www.mise.org/pdf/cpre2000_2001.pdf.
OCR for page 521
521
APPENDIX G
Constable, G., and B. Somerville. 2003. A Century of Innovation: Twenty Engineering Achieve-
ments That Transformed Our Lives. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
Corporate R&D scorecard. 2005. Technology Review (September):56-61.
Council of Economic Advisers. 1995. Economic Report of the President. Washington, DC: US
Government Printing Office.
Council of Economic Advisors. 1995. Supporting Research and Development to Promote Eco-
nomic Growth: The Federal Government’s Role. Washington, DC: White House, October.
Council of Graduate Schools. 2004. Ph.D. Completion and Attrition: Policy, Numbers, Lead-
ership, and Next Steps. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools.
Council on Competitiveness. 1991. Gaining New Ground: Technology Priorities for America’s
Future. Washington, DC: Council on Competitiveness.
Council on Competitiveness. 2001. Clusters of Innovation: Regional Foundations of US Com-
petitiveness. Washington, DC: Council on Competitiveness.
Council on Competitiveness. 2004. Innovate America: National Innovation Initiative Summit
and Report: Thriving in a World of Challenge and Change. Washington, DC: Council on
Competitiveness.
Council on Government Relations. 1999. The Bayh-Dole Act: A Guide to the Law and Imple-
menting Regulations. Washington, DC: CGR. Available at: http://www.ucop.edu/ott/
bayh.html.
Council on Governmental Relations. 2003. Report of the Working Group on the Cost of
Doing Business. Washington, DC: CGR, June 2.
Crow, M., and B. Bozeman. 1998. Limited by Design: R&D Laboratories and the U.S. Na-
tional Innovation System. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 5-6.
Dalton, D. H., M. G. Serapio, Jr., and P. G. Yoshida. 1999. Globalizing Industrial Research
and Development. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, Technology Admin-
istration, Office of Technology Policy.
Davis, T. M. 2003. Atlas of Student Mobility. New York: Institute of International Education.
Defense Science Board. 2001. The Defense Science Board 2001 Summer Study on Defense
Science and Technology. Washington, DC: DSB.
Department of Commerce. 2002. Commission on the Future of the United States Aerospace
Industry, Final Report. Arlington, VA: Department of Commerce. Available at: http://
www.ita.doc.gov/td/aerospace/aerospacecommission/AeroCommissionFinalReport.pdf.
Department of Defense. 2000. Quadrennial Defense Review Report. Washington, DC: De-
partment of Defense.
Department of Defense. 2001. Quadrennial Defense Review Report. Washington, DC: De-
partment of Defense.
Department of Energy. 1995. Task Force on Alternatives Futures for the Department of En-
ergy National Laboratories (Galvin Commission). Washington, DC: Department of
Energy.
Department of State. 2004. Revision to Visas Mantis Clearance Procedure. State 153587, No.
22. Available at: http://travel.state.gov/visa/state153587.html.
Dertouzos, M., R. Lester, and R. Solow. 1989. Made in America: Regaining the Productive
Edge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dickeson, R. C. 2004. Collision Course: Rising College Costs Threaten America’s Future and
Require Shared Solutions. Indianapolis, IN: Lumina Foundation for Education, Inc.
Dresselhaus, M. S., and I. L. Thomas. 2001. Alternative energy technologies. Nature 414:332-
337.
Dubois, L. H. 2003. DARPA’s Approach to Innovation and Its Reflection in Industry. In
Reducing the Time from Basic Research to Innovation in the Chemical Sciences: A Work-
shop Report to the Chemical Sciences Roundtable. Washington, DC: National Academy
Press, pp. 37-48.
OCR for page 522
522 RISING ABOVE THE GATHERING STORM
Dupree, A. H. 1986. Science in the Federal Government: A History of Policies and Activities,
2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Economic Policy Institute. 2004. EPI Issue Guide: Offshoring. Washington, DC: Economic
Policy Institute.
Ehrenberg, R. G., and L. Zhang. 2004. The Changing Nature of Faculty Employment. Work-
ing Paper 44. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Higher Education Research Institute.
Eisenberg, R. 2003. Science and the law: Patent swords and shields. Science 299(5609):1018-
1019.
European Commission. 2005. Enterprise and Industry Directorate-General. New and Emerg-
ing Science and Technology (NEST) Programme. Available at: http://www.cordis.lu/nest/
home.html.
Evenson, R. E. 2001. Economic impacts of agricultural research and extension. In Handbook
of Agricultural Economics Vol. 1, B. L. Gardner and G. C. Rausser, eds. Rotterdam:
Elsevier, pp. 573-628.
Finn, M. G. 2003. Stay Rates of Foreign Doctorate Recipients from US Universities, 2001.
Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education.
Florida, R. 2002. The Rise of the Creative Class . . . and How It’s Transforming Work,
Leisure, Community, & Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
Florida, R. 2005. The Flight of the Creative Class: The New Global Competition for Talent.
New York: Harper Business.
Forrester Research. 2004. Near-Term Growth of Offshoring Accelerating. Cambridge, MA:
Forrester Research, May 14.
Fox, M. F., and P. Stephan. 2001. Careers of young scientists: Preferences, prospects, and
reality by gender and field. Social Studies of Science 31:109-122.
Freeman, R. 2005. It’s a flat world, after all. New York Times, April 3, Section 6, Column 1,
Magazine Desk, p. 33.
Freeman, R. B. 2005. Does Globalization of the Scientific/Engineering Workforce Threaten US
Economic Leadership? Working Paper 11457. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Eco-
nomic Research.
Freeman, R., E. Weinstein, E. Marincola, J. Rosenbaum, and F. Solomon. 2001. CAREERS:
Competition and careers in biosciences. Science 294(5550):2293-2294.
Freeman, R. B., E. Jin, and C.-Y. Shen. 2004. Where Do New US-Trained Science-Engineering
PhDs Come From? Working Paper 10544. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Eco-
nomic Research.
Friedman, T. L. 2005. The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the 21st Century. New York:
Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, pp. 414-419.
Friedman, T. 2005. The end of the rainbow. New York Times, June 29.
Galvin Panel report. 1995. Task Force on Alternative Futures for the Department of Energy
National Laboratories, Secretary of Energy Advisory Board. Washington, DC: US De-
partment of Energy.
Geoffrey, C. 2005. America isn’t ready. Fortune, July 25.
Gereffi, G., and V. Wadhwa. 2005. Framing the Engineering Outsourcing Debate: Placing the
United States on a Level Playing Field with China and India. Available at: http://
memp.pratt.duke.edu/downloads/duke_outsourcing_2005.pdf.
Gerstner, L. V., Jr. 2004. Teaching at Risk: A Call to Action. New York: City University of
New York. Available at: http://www.theteachingcommission.org.
Glenn Commission. 2000. Before It’s Too Late: A Report to the Nation from the National
Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century. Washington,
DC: US Department of Education.
OCR for page 523
523
APPENDIX G
Golde, C. M., and T. M. Dore. 2000. At Cross Purposes: What the Experiences of Doctoral
Students Reveal About Doctoral Education. Philadelphia, PA: A Survey Initiated by The
Pew Charitable Trusts.
Gomory, R., and W. Baumol. 2001. Global Trade and Conflicting National Interests. Cam-
bridge, MA: MIT Press.
Gomory, R. E., and H. T. Shapiro. 2003. Globalization: Causes and Effects. Issues in Science
and Technology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Goo, S. K. 2004. Two-way traffic in airplane repair. Washington Post, June 1.
Goo, S. K. 2005. Airlines outsource upkeep. Washington Post, August 21. Available at: http:
//www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/20/AR2005082000979.
html.
Gordon, R. J. 2002. The United States. In Technological Innovation and Economic Perfor-
mance, B. Steil, D. G. Victor, and R. R. Nelson, eds. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University
Press, pp. 49-73.
Gordon, R. J. 2002. Technology and Economic Performance in the American Economy. Work-
ing Paper 8771. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Gordon, R. J. 2004. Why Was Europe Left at the Station When America’s Productivity Loco-
motive Departed? Working Paper 10661. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic
Research. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w10661.
Government Accountability Office. 2004. Border Security: Improvements Needed to Reduce
Time Taken to Adjudicate Visas for Science Students and Scholars. GAO-04-371. Wash-
ington, DC: GAO.
Government Accountability Office. 2005. National Nuclear Security Administration: Con-
tractors’ Strategies to Recruit and Retain and Critically Skilled Workforce Are Generally
Effective. GAO-05-164. Washington, DC: GAO.
Government Accountability Office. 2005. Border Security: Streamlined Visas Mantis Program
Has Lowered Burden on Science Students and Scholars, but Further Refinements Needed.
GAO-05-198. Washington, DC: GAO.
Government Accounting Office. 1998. Best Practices: Elements Critical to Successfully Reduc-
ing Unneeded RDT&E Infrastructure. USGAO Report to Congressional Requesters.
Washington, DC: GAO.
Grabowski, H., J. Vernon, and J. DiMasi. 2002. Returns on research and development for
1990s new drug introductions. Pharmacoeconomics 20(Supplement 3):11-29.
Gralla, P. 2004. U.S. lags in broadband adoption despite VoIP demand, says report. EE Times
Online. Available at: http://www.eet.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=55800449.
Gross, G. 2003. CEOs defend moving jobs offshore at tech summit. InfoWorld, October 9.
Hall, B. H., and J. van Reenen. 1999. How Effective Are Fiscal Incentives for R&D? A Review
of the Evidence. Working Paper 7098. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic
Research.
Hamilton, C. Winter 2003. University Technology Transfer and Economic Development: Pro-
posed Cooperative Economic Development Agreements Under the Bayh-Dole Act. John
Marshall Law Review.
Henry L. Stimson Center and Center for Strategic and International Studies. 2001. Enhancing
Multilateral Export Controls for US National Security. Washington, DC: Henry L.
Stimson Center.
Heyman, G. D., B. Martyna, and S. Bhatia. 2002. Gender and achievement-related beliefs
among engineering students. Journal of Women and Minorities in S&E 8:33-45.
Hicks, D. 2004. Asian countries strengthen their research. Issues in Science and Technology
20(4)(Summer 2004):75-78.
OCR for page 524
524 RISING ABOVE THE GATHERING STORM
Hira, R. 2004. Rochester Institute of Technology, presentation to Committee on Science, En-
gineering, and Public Policy, Workshop on International Students and Postdoctoral Schol-
ars, National Academies, July.
Hira, R., and A. Hira. 2005. Outsourcing America: What’s Behind Our National Crisis and
How We Can Reclaim American Jobs. Washington, DC: AMACOM Books.
Hobbs, F., and N. Stoops. 2004. Demographic Trends in the 20th Century. US Census Bureau,
CENSR-4. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau, November.
Holm-Nielsen, L. B. 2002. Promoting science and technology for development: The World
Bank’s Millennium Science Initiative. Paper delivered on April 30, 2002, to the First
International Senior Fellows meeting, The Wellcome Trust, London, UK.
Holmstrom, E. I., C. D. Gaddy, V. V. Van Horne, and C. M. Zimmerman. 1997. Best and
Brightest: Education and Career Paths of Top S&E Students. Washington, DC: Commis-
sion on Professionals in Science and Technology.
Hughes, K. H. 2005. Building the Next US Century: The Past and Future of US Economic
Competitiveness. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
Hughes, K. H. 2005. Facing the global competitiveness challenge. Issues in Science and Tech-
nology 21(4):72-78.
Hundt, R. 2003. Why is government subsidizing the old networks when “Big Broadband”
convergence is inevitable and optimal? New America Foundation Issue Brief December.
Hunter, K. 2005. Education key to jobs, Microsoft CEO says. August 17. Available at:
Stateline.org.
IMD International. 2005. World Competitiveness Yearbook. London: Thompson Learning.
Information Technology Association of America. 2004. The Impact of Offshore IT Software
and Services Outsourcing on the US Economy and the IT Industry. Lexington, MA: Glo-
bal Insight (USA), March.
Institute for International Education. 2004. Open Doors Report on International Educational
Exchange. New York: Institute for International Education.
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. 2004. Position Statement on Offshore
Outsourcing. Washington, DC. Available at: www.ieeeusa.org/policy/positions/
offshoring.asp.
International Association of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers & Associations. 2004. A Review
of Existing Data Exclusivity Legislation in Selected Countries. January. Available at: http:
//www.who.int/intellectualproperty/topics/ip/en/Data.exclusivity.review.doc.
Jackson, R., and N. Howe. 2003. The 2003 Aging Vulnerability Index. Washington, DC: CSIS
and Watson Wyatt Worldwide, p. 43.
Joint Chiefs of Staff. 2001. Joint Vision 2020. Washington, DC: Department of Defense.
Jones, B. 2005. Age and Great Innovation. Working Paper 11359. Cambridge, MA: National
Bureau of Economic Research. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w11359.
Kalita, S. M. Virtual secretary puts new face on Pakistan. Washington Post, May 10, 2005,
p. A01.
Kane, T. J., and P. R. Orszag. 2003. Higher Education Spending: The Role of Medicaid and
the Business Cycle. Policy Brief #124. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Kanellos, M. 2004. IBM sells PC group to Lenovo. News.com, December 8.
Kapur, D., and J. McHale. 2005. Sojourns and Software: Internationally Mobile Human Capi-
tal and High-Tech Industry Development in India, Ireland, and Israel. Oxford, UK: Ox-
ford University Press.
Kerr, W. 2004. Ethnic Scientific Communities and International Technology Diffusion. Work-
ing Paper. Available at: http://econ-www.mit.edu/faculty/download_pdf.php?id=994.
King, A. F. 2005. Policy Implications of Changes in Higher Education Finance, presentation to
the National Academies’ Board on Higher Education and Workforce, Washington, DC,
April 21-22.
OCR for page 525
525
APPENDIX G
King, D. A. 2004. The scientific impact of nations. Nature 430(6997)(July 15):311-316.
King, J. L. 2003. Patent examination procedures and patent quality. In Patents in the Knowledge-
Based Economy, W. M. Cohen and S. A. Merrill, eds. Washington, DC: The National Acad-
emies Press, pp. 54-73.
Kissler, J. 2005. Why It Is in the Interest to Address the Growing Gap Between Public and
Private Universities. Oakland, CA: University of California.
Knezo, G. J. 2003. Sensitive but Unclassified and Other Federal Security Controls on Scientific
and Technical Information: History and Current Controversy. Washington, DC: Con-
gressional Research Service.
Korean Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST). Available at: http://www.most.go.kr/
most/english/link_2.jsp.
Lane, N., and T. Kalil. 2005. The National Nanotechnology Initiative: Present at the Creation.
Issues in Science and Technology 21(Summer):49-54.
Laudicina, P. A. 2005. World Out of Balance: Navigating Global Risks to Seize Competitive
Advantage. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Leonard, J. A. 2003. How Structural Costs Imposed on U.S. Manufacturers Harm Workers
and Threaten Competitiveness. Washington, DC: National Association of Manufactur-
ers. Available at: http://www.nam.org/s_nam/bin.asp?CID=216&DID=227525&DOC=
FILE.PDF.
Lewin, T. 2005. Many going to college are not ready, report says. New York Times,
August 17.
Lewis, W. W. 2004. The Power of Productivity: Wealth, Poverty, and the Threat to Global
Stability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lim, P. J. 2006. Looking ahead means looking abroad. New York Times, January 8.
Lu, A. 2002. The Decision Cycle for People Going to Graduate School. Stamford, CT:
Peterson’s Thomson Learning.
Madey v. Duke Univ. 307 F.3d 1351. Available at: 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 20823, 64
U.S.P.Q.2d. (BNA) 1737 (Fed. Cir. 2002).
Mandel, M. J. 2004. Rational Exuberance: Silencing the Enemies of Growth and Why the
Future Is Better Than You Think. New York: Harper Business, p. 27.
Mann, W. C. 2003. Globalization of IT Services and White Collar Jobs. Washington, DC:
Institute for International Economics.
Mansfield, E. 1991. Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy 20:1-12.
Markusen, A. R., and Costigan, S. S. 1999. The Military Industrial Challenge. In Arming the
Future: A Defense Industry for the 21st Century, A. R. Markusen and S. S. Costigan, eds.
New York: Council on Foreign Relations, p. 8.
Mashelkar, R. A. 2005. India’s R&D: Reaching for the top. Science 307:1415-1417.
Math and Science Expert Panel. 2004. Exemplary Promising Mathematics Programs. Wash-
ington, DC: US Department of Education.
May, R. M. 2004. Raising Europe’s game. Nature 430:831.
McKinsey and Company. 2003. Offshoring: Is It a Win-Win Game? New York: McKinsey and
Company, August.
McKinsey and Company. 2005. The Emerging Global Labor Market: Part II—The Supply of
Offshore Talent in Services. New York: McKinsey and Company, June, p. 23.
Mehlman, B. 2003. Offshore Outsourcing and the Future of American Competitiveness. Busi-
ness Roundtable Working Group
Merck Institute for Science Education (MISE). Available at: http://www.mise.org/mise/index.jsp.
Mervis, J. 2003. Down for the count. Science 300(5622)(May 16):1070-1074.
Ministry of Science and Technology. 2004. Chinese Statistical Yearbook 2004. People’s Re-
public of China, Chapter 21, Table 21-11. Available at: http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/
statisticaldata/yearlydata/yb2004-e/indexeh.htm.
OCR for page 526
526 RISING ABOVE THE GATHERING STORM
Moore, S., and Simon, J. L. 1999. The Greatest Century That Ever Was: 25 Miraculous Trends
of the Last 100 Years. Policy Analysis No. 364. Washington, DC: Cato Institute, Decem-
ber 15.
Nadiri, M. I. 1993. Innovations and Technical Spillovers. Working Paper 4423. Cambridge,
MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
NASSCOM. 2005. Strategic Review 2005. India: National Association of Software and Ser-
vice Companies. Chapter 6, Sustaining the India Advantage. Available at: http://www.
nasscom.org/strategic2005.asp.
The National Academies. 2005. Policy Implications of International Graduate Students and
Postdoctoral Scholars in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies
Press.
National Academy of Engineering. 1999. Concerning Federally Sponsored Inducement Prizes
in Engineering and Science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Academy of Engineering. 2003. The Impact of Academic Research on Industrial
Performance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Academy of Engineering and Institute of Medicine. 2005. Building a Better Delivery
System: A New Engineering/Health Care Partnership. Washington, DC: The National
Academies Press.
National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council. 2005. Enhancing the Com-
munity College Pathway to Engineering Careers. Washington, DC: The National Acad-
emies Press.
National Academy of Sciences. 1996. Ozone Depletion, Beyond Discovery Series. Washing-
ton, DC: National Academy Press, April.
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine.
1993. Science, Technology, and the Federal Government: National Goals for a New Era.
Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine.
1995. Reshaping the Graduate Education of Scientists and Engineers. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press.
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine.
1999. Capitalizing on Investments in Science and Technology. Washington, DC: Na-
tional Academy Press.
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine.
2000. Enhancing the Postdoctoral Experience for Scientists and Engineers. Washington,
DC: National Academy Press.
National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine.
2002. Observations on the President’s Fiscal Year 2003 Federal Science and Technology
Budget. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, pp. 14-16.
National Center for Education Statistics. 1999. Highlights from TIMSS. Available at: http://
nces.ed.gov/pubs99/1999081.pdf.
National Center for Education Statistics. 2004. Schools and Staffing Survey: Qualifications of
the Public School Teacher Workforce: Prevalence of Out-of-Field Teaching 1987-88 to
1999-2000 (Revised), p. 10. Available at: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2002/2002603.pdf.
National Center for Education Statistics. 2004. Digest of Education Statistics 2004. Washing-
ton, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, Department of Education, Table 250. Available
at: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d04/tables/dt04_250.asp.
National Center for Education Statistics. 2005. International Outcomes of Learning in Math-
ematics Literacy and Problem Solving: PISA 2003 Results from the U.S. Perspective.
Washington, DC: US Department of Education, pp. 15, 29. Available at: http://nces.
ed.gov/pubs2005/2005003.pdf.
OCR for page 527
527
APPENDIX G
National Center for Education Statistic. 2006. Public Elementary and Secondary Students,
Staff, Schools, and School Districts: School Year 2003–04. Available at: http://nces.ed.gov/
pubs2006/2006307.pdf.
National Center for Education Statistics. 2006. The Nation’s Report Card: Mathematics 2005.
Available at: http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/main2005/2006453.pdf.
National Center for Teaching and America’s Future. 1996. Doing What Matters Most: Teach-
ing for America’s Future. New York: NCTAF.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 2000. Principles and Standards for School
Mathematics. Washington, DC: NCTM. Available at: http://standards.nctm.org.
National Critical Technologies Panel. 1991. Report of the National Critical Technologies
Panel. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
National Critical Technologies Panel. 1993. The Second Biennial Report of the National Criti-
cal Technologies Panel. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
National Critical Technologies Panel. 1995. The National Critical Technologies Report. Wash-
ington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
National Energy Policy Development Group. 2001. National Energy Policy. Washington, DC:
US Government Printing Office, May.
National Institutes of Health. 2001. Working Group on Construction of Research Facilities. A
Report to the Advisory Committee of the Director, National Institutes of Health.
Bethesda, MD: NIH.
National Institutes of Health. 2005. NIH Roadmap, High Risk Research. Available at: http://
nihroadmap.nih.gov/highrisk/.
National Intelligence Council. 2004. Mapping the Global Future: Report of the National Intel-
ligence Council’s 2020 Project. Pittsburgh, PA: Government Printing Office.
National Research Council. 1982. Scientific Communication and National Security. Washing-
ton, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 1984. High-Technology Ceramics in Japan. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 1995. Allocating Federal Funds for Science and Technology. Wash-
ington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 1995. Evolving the High Performance Computing and Communi-
cations Initiative to Support the Nation’s Information Infrastructure. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 1997. Industrial Research and Innovation Indicators. Washing-
ton, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 1997. Improving Teacher Preparation and Credentialing Consis-
tent with the National Science Education Standards: Report of a Symposium. Washing-
ton, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 1997. Science for All Children: A Guide to Improving Elementary
Science Education in Your School District. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 1998. Trends in the Early Careers of Life Scientists. Washington,
DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 1999. Balancing Scientific Openness and National Security Con-
trols at the Nuclear Weapons Laboratories. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 1999. A Strategic Plan for Education Research and Its Utilization.
Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 1999. Harnessing Science and Technology for America’s Eco-
nomic Future: National and Regional Priorities. Washington, DC: National Academy
Press.
OCR for page 528
528 RISING ABOVE THE GATHERING STORM
National Research Council. 1999. Challenges and Opportunities. Washington, DC: National
Academy Press.
National Research Council. 1999. The Advanced Technology Program: Challenges and Op-
portunities, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 1999. The Small Business Innovation Research Program: Chal-
lenges and Opportunities. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 1999. Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Math-
ematics, Engineering, and Technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 1999. US Industry in 2000: Studies in Competitive Performance.
Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 1999. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School.
Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available at: http://books.nap.edu/catalog/
6160.html.
National Research Council. 1999. Harnessing Science and Technology for America’s Eco-
nomic Future. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 1999. U.S. Industry in 2000: Studies in Competitive Renewal.
Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 1999. On Evaluating Curricular Effectiveness: Judging the Qual-
ity of K–12 Mathematics Evaluations. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 2000. New Practices for the New Millennium. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 2000. An Assessment of the Department of Defense’s Fast Track
Initiative. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 2000. Attracting Science and Mathematics Ph.D.s to Secondary
School Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available at: http://
www.nap.edu/catalog/9955.html.
National Research Council. 2000. The Small Business Innovation Research Program: An As-
sessment of the Department of Defense Fast Track Initiative. Washington, DC: National
Academy Press.
National Research Council. 2000. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School:
Expanded Edition. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 2001. Trends in Federal Support of Research and Graduate Edu-
cation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 2001. Building a Workforce for the Information Economy. Wash-
ington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 2001. Educating Teachers of Science, Mathematics, and Technol-
ogy: New Practices for a New Millennium. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 2001. Review of the Research Program of the Partnership for a
New Generation of Vehicles. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 2001. The Advanced Technology Program: Assessing Outcomes.
Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 2001. Building a Workforce for the Information Economy. Wash-
ington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 2002. Attracting PhDs to K–12 Education: A Demonstration Pro-
gram for Science, Mathematics, and Technology. Washington, DC: National Academy
Press.
National Research Council. 2002. Learning and Understanding: Improving Advanced Study
of Mathematics and Science in U.S. Schools. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National Research Council. 2002. Making the Nation Safer: The Role of Science and Technol-
ogy in Countering Terrorism. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
OCR for page 529
529
APPENDIX G
National Research Council. 2003. Securing the Future: Regional and National Programs to
Support the Semiconductor Industry. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. 2003. Frontiers in Agricultural Research: Food, Health, Environ-
ment, and Communities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. 2004. A Patent System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC:
The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. 2004. An Assessment of the Small Business Innovation Research
Program: Project Methodology. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. 2004. Biotechnology Research in an Age of Terrorism. Washing-
ton, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. 2004. Measuring Research and Development Expenditures in the
U.S. Economy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. 2004. Evaluation of the National Aerospace Initiative. Washing-
ton, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. 2004. Program Diversity and Assessment Challenges, Report of a
Symposium. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. 2004. Engaging Schools: Fostering High-School Students’ Moti-
vation to Learn. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. 2005. Assessment of Department of Defense Basic Research. Wash-
ington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. 2005. Bridges to Independence: Fostering the Independence of
New Investigators in Biomedical Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies
Press.
National Research Council. 2005. Avoiding Surprise in an Era of Global Technology Ad-
vances. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. 2005. National Laboratories: Building New Ways to Work To-
gether. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council. 2005. Advancing the Nation’s Health Needs. Washington, DC:
The National Academies Press.
National Science and Technology Council. 1995. Final Report on Academic Research Infra-
structure: A Federal Plan for Renewal. Washington, DC: White House Office of Science
and Technology Policy.
National Science and Technology Council. 2000. Ensuring a Strong US Scientific, Technical,
and Engineering Workforce in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: Executive Office of
the President of the United States.
National Science Board. 2003. Science and Engineering Infrastructure for the 21st Century:
The Role of the National Science Foundation. Arlington, VA: NSF.
National Science Board. 2004. Committee on Programs and Plans, Charge to the Task Force
on Transformative Research. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/committees/
cpptrcharge.htm.
National Science Board. 2004. Science and Engineering Indicators 2004. Arlington, VA: NSF.
Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/seind04/c4/c4h.htm.
National Science Board. 2004. Report to the National Science Board on the National Science
Foundation’s Merit Review Process Fiscal Year 2004. NSB-05-12. Arlington, VA: NSB.
National Science Foundation. 1999. Preparing Our Children: Math and Science Education in
the National Interest. Arlington, VA: NSF.
National Science Foundation. 2001. Survey of Doctorate Recipients 2001, the NSF Survey of
Graduate Students and Postdocs. Arlington, VA: NSF.
National Science Foundation. 2003. Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure,
Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure. Arlington, VA:
NSF.
OCR for page 530
530 RISING ABOVE THE GATHERING STORM
National Science Foundation. 2003. The Science and Engineering Workforce: Realizing
America’s Potential. Arlington, VA: NSF.
National Science Foundation. 2003. Graduate Enrollment Increases in Science and Engineer-
ing Fields, Especially in Engineering and Computer Sciences. NSF 03-315. Arlington, VA:
NSF.
National Science Foundation. 2004. Graduate Enrollment in Science and Engineering Fields
Reaches New Peak; First-Time Enrollment of Foreign Students Declines. NSF 04-326.
Arlington, VA: NSF.
National Science Foundation. 2004. Survey of Graduate Students and Postdoctorates in Sci-
ence and Engineering 2002. Arlington, VA: NSF.
National Science Foundation. 2005. Survey of Earned Doctorates, 2003. Arlington, VA: NSF.
National Science Foundation. 2005. Graduate Enrollment in Science and Engineering Pro-
grams Up in 2003, but Declines for First-Time Foreign Students: Info Brief. NSF 05-317.
Arlington, VA: NSF.
National Science Foundation, Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure. 2003. Revolutionizing
Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure. Arlington, VA: NSF.
National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. 2000. Science and Engi-
neering Research Facilities at Colleges and Universities, 1998. NSF-01-301. Arlington,
VA: NSF.
Nelson, R. R., ed. 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. New York:
Oxford University Press.
Noon, C. 2005. Starbuck’s Schultz bemoans health care costs. Forbes Magazine, September
19.
Nordhaus, W. 1999. The Contribution of Improved Health and Living Standards. Working
Paper 8818. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Nordhaus, W. 2005. The Sources of the Productivity Rebound and the Manufacturing Em-
ployment Puzzle. Working Paper 11354. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic
Research.
Office of Management and Budget. 2005. Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal
Year 2006. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Office of Science and Technology of Canada. 2005. Immigration Policy Change Widens Door
for Foreign Students and Scholars. Bridges 6. July 13. Available at: http://bridges.
ostina.org.
Office of Science and Technology Policy. 2000. Analysis of Facilities and Administrative Costs
at Universities. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
Office of Scientific Research and Development. 1945. Science—The Endless Frontier. Wash-
ington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Ohland, M. W., G. Zhang, B. Thorndyke, and T. J. Anderson. 2004. Grade-Point Average,
Changes of Major, and Majors Selected by Students Leaving Engineering. 34th ASEE/
IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Session T1G:12-17.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 1998. Technology, Productivity,
and Job Creation: Best Policy Practices. Paris: OECD Publications.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2002. International Mobility of
the Highly Skilled. Policy Brief 92 2002 01 1P4. Paris: OECD Publications. Available at:
http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/9/20/1950028.pdf.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2003. Science, Technology and
Industry Scoreboard, 2003 R&D Database. Paris: OECD Publications. Available at: http:
//www1oecd.org/publications/e-book/92-2003-04-1-7294/.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2003. Tax Incentive for Research
and Development: Trends and Issues. Paris: OECD Publications. Available at: http://
www.oecd.org/dataoecd/12/27/2498389.pdf.
OCR for page 531
531
APPENDIX G
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2004. Science, Technology and
Industry Outlook. Paris: OECD Publications, December, pp. 25, 67, 190. Available at:
http://www.oecd.org/document/63/0,2340,en_2649_33703_33995839_1_1_1_1,00.
html.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2004. The Economic Impact of
ICT. Paris: OECD Publications.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2005. China Overtakes U.S. as
World’s Leading Exporter of Information Technology Goods. Paris: OECD Publications,
December 12.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2005. OECD Broadband Statis-
tics. Paris: OECD Publications, June. Update October 20, 2005. Available at: http://
www.oecd.org/document/16/0,2340,en_2649_201185_35526608_1_1_1_1,00.
html#data2004.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2005. Trends in International
Migration: 2004 Annual Report. Paris: OECD Publications. See http://www.work
permit.com for more information on immigration policies in English-speaking countries
and the European Union.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2005. Main Science & Technol-
ogy Indicators. Paris: OECD Publications. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/document/
26/0,2340,en_2649_34451_1901082_1_1_1_1,00.html.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2005. Education at a Glance 2005.
Paris: OECD Publications. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/41/13/35341210.pdf.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2005. Program for International
Student Assessment. Paris: OECD Publications. Available at: http://www.pisa.oecd.org.
Organization for International Investment. The Facts About Insourcing. Available at: http://
www.ofii.org/insourcing/.
Parker, L. 1997. The Engineering Research Centers (ERC) Program: An Assessment of Ben-
efits and Outcomes. Arlington, VA: NSF. Available at: www.nsf.gov/pubs/1998/nsf9840/
nsf9840.htm.
Parsons, M. 2005. Higher education is just another special interest. The Chronicle of Higher
Education 51(22):B20. Available at: http://chronicle.com/prm/weekly/v51/i22/
22b02001.htm.
Peterson, P. G. 2002. The shape of things to come: Global aging in the 21st century. Journal of
International Affairs 56(1)(Fall). New York: Columbia University Press.
Pew Research Center. 2005. U.S. Image Up Slightly, But Still Negative, American Character
Gets Mixed Reviews. Pew Global Attitudes Project. Washington, DC. Available at: http://
pewglobal.org/reports/display.php?ReportID=247.
Piore, M. J., and C. F. Sabel. 1984. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity.
New York: Basic Books.
Popper, S. W., and C. S. Wagner. 2002. New Foundations for Growth: The US Innovation
System Today and Tomorrow. Arlington, VA: RAND.
Popper, S. W., C. S. Wagner, and E. V. Larson. 1998. New Forces at Work: Industry Views
Critical Technologies. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
Powell, K. 2005. Hot house high. Nature 435:874-875.
Preeg, E. H. 2003. The Emerging Chinese Advanced Technology Superstate. Arlington, VA:
Manufacturers Alliance/MAPI and Hudson Institute.
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. 1997. Federal Energy Research
and Development for the Challenges of the Twenty-First Century-Report of the Energy
Research and Development Panel. Washington, DC: The President’s Committee of Advi-
sors on Science and Technology.
OCR for page 532
532 RISING ABOVE THE GATHERING STORM
President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. 2004. Sustaining the Nation’s
Innovation Ecosystems, Information Technology Manufacturing and Competitiveness.
Washington, DC: White House Office of Science and Technology Policy.
President’s Information Technology Advisory Committee. 2005. Computational Science: En-
suring America’s Competitiveness. Washington, DC: National Coordination Office for
Information Technology Research and Development (NCO/ITR&D).
Prestowitz, C. 2005. Three Billion New Capitalists: The Great Shift of Wealth and Power to
the East. New York: Basic Books.
Raven, P. 2005. Biodiversity and our common future. Bulletin of the American Academy of
Arts & Sciences 58:20-24.
Rizzo, M. 2005. State Preferences for Higher Education Spending: A Panel Data Analysis,
1977-2001. Paper presented at Cornell Higher Education Research Institute’s Annual
Conference, “Assessing Public Higher Education at the Start of the 21st Century,” Ithaca,
NY, May 22-23.
Roach, S. 2004. More jobs, worse work. New York Times, July 22.
Romer, P. 1993. Implementing a National Technology Strategy with Self-Organizing Industry
Investment Boards. In Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics (2), M.
N. Baily, P. C. Reiss, and C. Winston, eds. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Romer, P. M. 2000. Should the Government Subsidize Supply or Demand in the Market for
Scientists and Engineers? Working Paper 7723. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau for
Economic Research. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w7723/.
Rutherford, F. J., and A. Ahlgren. 1990. Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Ameri-
can Association for the Advancement of Science, October. Available at: http://www.
project2061.org/default_flash.htm.
Samuelson, P. A. 2004. Where Ricardo and Mill rebut and confirm arguments of mainstream
economists supporting globalization. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18(Summer):135-
146.
Samuelson, R. 2005. China’s devalued Concession. Washington Post, July 26.
Samuelson, R. 2005. The world is still round. Newsweek, July 25.
Saxenian, A. L. 1999. Silicon Valley’s New Immigrant Entrepreneurs. San Francisco: Public
Policy Institute. Available at: http://www.ccis-ucsd.org/PUBLICATIONS/wrkg15.PDF.
Saxenian, A. L. 2002. Brian circulation: How high-skill immigration makes everyone
better off. The Brookings Review 20(1)(Winter 2002). Washington, DC: Brookings
Institution.
Schmidt, W. H., C. McKnight, R. T. Houang, and D. E. Wiley. 2005. The Heinz 57 Curricu-
lum: When More May Be Less. Paper presented at the 2005 annual meeting of the Ameri-
can Education Research Association, Montreal, Quebec.
Scott, A., G. Steyn, A. Geuna, S. Brusoni, and W. E. Steinmeuller. 2001. The Economic Re-
turns of Basic Research and the Benefits of University-Industry Relationships. Report for
the UK Government Office of Science and Technology. Brighton: SPRU (Science and
Technology Policy Research), University of Sussex. Available at: http://www.sussex.ac.uk/
spru/documents/review_for_ost_final.pdf.
Secretary of Energy’s Advisory Board, Task Force on the Future of Science Programs at the
Department of Energy. 2003. Critical Choices: Science, Energy and Security. Final Re-
port. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy, October 13.
Semiconductor Industry Association. 2005. Choosing to Compete. December 12. Available at:
www.choosetocompete.org/.
Seymour, E., and N. Hewitt. 1997. Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the
Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Shanghai’s Jiao Tong University Institute of Higher Education. 2004. Academic Ranking of
World Universities. Available at: http://ed.sjtu.edu.cn/rank/2004/2004Main.htm.
OCR for page 533
533
APPENDIX G
Sharma, D. C., and M. Yamamoto. 2004. How India is handling international backlash. CNET
news.com, May 6.
Sigma Xi. 2004. Sigma Xi National Postdoctoral Survey. Available at: http://postdoc.
sigmaxi.org.
Smith, T. 2001. The Retention and Graduation Rates of 1993-1999 Entering Science, Math-
ematics, Engineering, and Technology Majors in 175 Colleges and Universities. Norman,
OK: Center for Institutional Data Exchange and Analysis (C-IDEA), the University of
Oklahoma.
Solow, R. M. 1957. Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of
Economics and Statistics 39:312-320.
Solow, R. M. 1960. Investment and Technical Progress. Available at: http://nobelprize.org/
economics/laureates/1987/index.html.
Segal, A. 2004. Is America losing its edge? Innovation in a globalized world. Foreign Affairs
November/December.
Spencer, S. 2005. 2004. CEO Study: A Statistical Snapshot of Leading CEOs. Available at:
http://content.spencerstuart.com/sswebsite/pdf/lib/Statistical_Snapshot_of_Leading_
CEOs_relB3.pdf#search=’ceo%20educational%20background’.
Spotts, P. N. 2005. Pulling the plug on science? Christian Science Monitor, April 14.
Steil, B., D. G. Victor, and R. R. Nelson. 2002. Technological Innovation and Economic
Performance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Stephan, P. E., and S. G. Levin, eds. 2005. Foreign Scholars in US Science: Contributions and
Costs in Science and the University. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Stokes, D. E. 1997. Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Wash-
ington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Subotnik, R. F., K. M. Stone, and C. Steiner. 2001. Lost generation of elite talent in science.
Journal of Secondary Gifted Education 13:33-43.
Task Force on the Future of American Innovation. 2005. The Knowledge Economy: Is the
United States Losing Its Competitive Edge, Benchmarks for Our Innovation Future. Wash-
ington, DC: The Task Force on the Future of US Innovation, February.
Teitelbaum, M. S. 2003. Do we need more scientists? The Public Interest 153:40-53.
Tobias, S. 1990. They’re Not Dumb, They’re Different. Stalking the Second Tier. Tucson, AZ:
Research Corporation.
Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development. 2001. Backgrounder: How New Drugs
Move Through the Development and Approval Process. November 1. Available at: http:
//csdd.tufts.edu/NewsEvents/RecentNews.asp?newsid=4.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. 2004. World Investment Report 2004:
The Shift Towards Services. New York and Geneva: United Nations.
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 1999. The
World at Six Billion. October 12. Available at: http://www.un.org/esa/population/
publications/sixbillion/sixbillion.htm.
United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2005. International Comparisons of Hourly Com-
pensation Costs for Production Workers in Manufacturing, 2004. November 18. Avail-
able at: ftp://ftp.bls.gov/pub/news.release/History/ichcc.11182005.news.
United States Commission on National Security. 2001. Road Map for National Security: Im-
perative for Change. Washington, DC: US Commission on National Security.
United States of America’s Embassy. 1996. China’s Science and Technology Policy for the
Twenty-First Century—A View from the Top. Report from the US Embassy, Beijing,
November.
US Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2005. Business Employment Dynamics: First Quarter 2005.
November 18. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/rofod/3640.pdf.
US Bureau of the Census. 1975. Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to
1970. Part 1, Series B 107-15. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.
OCR for page 534
534 RISING ABOVE THE GATHERING STORM
US Census Bureau. 2000. Statistical Abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: US Cen-
sus Bureau.
US Census Bureau Database. Total Mid-Year Population, 2004-2050. Available at: http://
www.census.gov/ipc/www/idbsprd.html.
US Congress House of Representatives Committee on Science. 1998. Unlocking Our Future:
Toward a New National Science Policy (the “Ehlers Report”). September 24. Washing-
ton, DC: US Congress. Available at: http://www.house.gov/science/science_policy_
report.htm.
US Commission on National Security. 2001. Road Map for National Security: Imperative for
Change. Washington, DC: US Commission on National Security.
US Department of Commerce. 2004. Spectrum Policy for the 21st Century: The President’s
Spectrum Policy Initiative. Report 1. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce,
June. Available at: http://www.ntia.doc.gov/reports/specpolini/presspecpolini_report1_
06242004.htm.
US Department of Education. 1994. Prisoners of Time. National Education Commission on
Time and Learning. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
US Department of Education. 1998. Pursuing Excellence: A Study of Twelfth-Grade Math-
ematics and Science Achievement in International Context. National Center for Educa-
tion Statistics 98-049. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
US Department of Education. 2000. NAEP 1999 Trends in Academic Progress: Three Decades
of Academic Performance. National Center for Education Statistics 2000-469. Washing-
ton, DC: US Department of Education.
US Department of Energy. 2001. Infrastructure Frontier: A Quick Look Survey of the Office of
Science Laboratory Infrastructure. Washington, DC: DOE, April.
US Department of Energy. 2005. Laboratory Science Teacher Professional Development Pro-
gram: About LSTPD. Washington, DC: Office of Science, Office of Workforce Develop-
ment for Teachers and Scientists.
US Department of Labor. 2001. Report on the American Workforce. Washington, DC: De-
partment of Labor. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/opub/rtaw/pdf/rtaw2001.pdf.
US General Accounting Office. 2001. Contributions to and Results of the Small Business Tech-
nology Transfer Program. Statement by Jim Wells. GAO-01-867T. Washington, DC:
GAO.
US General Accounting Office. 2002. Lessons Learned from Previous Research Could Benefit
FreedomCAR Initiative. Statement of Jim Wells. GAO-02-810T. Washington, DC: GAO.
US Geological Survey. 1998. Building Safer Structures. Fact Sheet 167-95. Reston, VA: USGS,
June. Available at: http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/prepare/factsheets/SaferStructures/Safer
Structures.pdf.
US Geological Survey. 1998. Speeding Earthquake Disaster Relief. Fact Sheet 097-95. Reston,
VA: USGS, June. Available at: http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/prepare/factsheets/Mitigation/
Mitigation.pdf.
US Patent and Trademark Office. 2006. USPTO Annual List of Top 10 Organizations Receiv-
ing Most U.S. Patents. January 10. Available at: http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/com/
speeches/06-03.htm.
Vedder, R. 2004. Growing Broke by Degree: Why College Costs Too Much. Washington, DC:
AEI Press.
Venezia, A., M. W. Kirst, and A. L. Antonio. 2003. Betraying the College Dream: How Dis-
connected K–12 and Postsecondary Education Systems Undermine Student Aspirations.
Stanford, CA: The Bridge Project, Stanford University. Available at: http://www.
stanford.edu/group/bridgeproject/betrayingthecollegedream.pdf.
Wagner, C. S., and S. W. Popper. 2003. Identifying critical technologies in the USA. Journal of
Forecasting 22:113-128.
OCR for page 535
535
APPENDIX G
Walsh, K. 2005. Foreign High-Tech R&D in China: Risks, Rewards, and Implications for US-
China Relations. Washington, DC: Henry L. Stimson Center.
Wilson, D. J. 2002. Is embodied technological change the result of upstream R&D? Industry-
level evidence. Review of Economic Dynamics 5(2):342-362.
Wulf, Wm. A. 2005. Review and Renewal of the Environment for Innovation. Unpublished
paper.
Wulf, Wm. A. 2005. Observations on Science and Technology Trends: Their Potential Impact
on Our Future. In Technology Futures and Global Wealth, Power and Conflict, A. G. K.
Solomon, ed. Washington, DC: CSIS.
Zumeta, W., and J. S. Raveling. 2001. The Best and the Brightest for Science: Is There a
Problem Here? In Innovation Policy in the Knowledge-Based Economy, M. P. Feldman
and A. N. Link, eds. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 121-161.
Zumeta, W., and J. S. Raveling. 2002. Attracting the best and the brightest. Issues in Science
and Technology (Winter).
Zumeta, W., and J. S. Raveling. 2004. The Market for Ph.D. Scientists: Discouraging the Best
and Brightest? Discouraging All? AAAS Symposium, February 16. Available at: http://
www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2004-02/uow-rsl021304.php.
OCR for page 536
Representative terms from entire chapter:
engineering fields
