National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$54.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Preventing Medication Errors: Quality Chasm Series (2007)
Board on Health Care Services (HCS)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix C Medication Errors: Incidence Rates ." Preventing Medication Errors: Quality Chasm Series. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2007.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
369
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Preventing Medication Errors

In the subset of studies that evaluated preventable ADEs, prescription errors associated with patient injuries ranged from 3.7 to 84.1 per 1,000 admissions (Bates et al., 1995b; Hardmeier et al., 2004; Nebeker et al., 2005).

Preparation and Dispensing of the Drug

Preparation and dispensing errors occurred at a rate of 2.6 per 1,000 admissions in a tertiary care hospital in Florida (Winterstein et al., 2004) (see Table C-2).

Two studies focused exclusively on intravenous (IV) medications. One study, at one U.K. and two German hospitals, found a rate of preparation errors of 26 percent per observed preparation (88 preparation errors out of 337 observations) (Wirtz et al., 2003). The other study, at a tertiary and a community hospital in the United Kingdom, found a rate of preparation errors of 49 percent per observed preparation (212 preparation and administration errors out of 430 doses) (Taxis and Barber, 2003).

Preparation and dispensing errors were associated with preventable ADEs at rates of 0.6 per 1,000 admissions in a Swiss study of 6,383 patients (Hardmeier et al., 2004); 1.1 per 1,000 admissions in a study of 4,031 patients at two tertiary hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts (Bates et al., 1995b); and 1.6 per 1,000 admissions in a study of 937 admissions at a tertiary hospital in Salt Lake City, Utah (Nebeker et al., 2005).

Administration of the Drug

As with prescribing error rates, rates of administration errors varied widely in medical and surgical units (See Table C-3). Rates per opportunity

TABLE C-2 Hospital Care: Preparation and Dispensing Errors

Error rates: general medications

Per 1,000 admissions—detection method

2.6 (Winterstein et al., 2004)—prompted reports

Error rates: intravenous (IV) medications

Per preparation—detection method

26 percent (Wirtz et al., 2003) (U.K. and German study)—direct observation

49 percent (Taxis and Barber, 2003) (U.K. study)—direct observation

Preventable ADEs

Per 1,000 admissions—detection method

0.6 (Hardmeier et al., 2004) (Swiss study)—chart review

1.1 (Bates et al., 1995b)—prompted reporting, chart review

1.4 (Nebeker et al., 2005)—review of electronic medical record

Page
369