Items in cart [0] Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK list:$29.00 Web:$26.10 add to cart Rights & Permissions Free PDF Access Free Resources Sign in to download PDF book and chapters Display this book on your site! Related Titles Promoting Innovation: 2002 Assessment of the Partnership for Advancing Technology in Housing Facing Hazards and Disasters: Understanding Human Dimensions Other Related Titles Proceedings of a Workshop to Review PATH Strategy, Operating Plan, and Performance Measures (2006) Board on Infrastructure and the Constructed Environment (BICE) Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web. Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book. Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic. Page 56   E-mail  Facebook  Digg  Stumble  Twitter More The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy. C Workshop Agenda and Participants DECEMBER 9, 2005, AGENDA 8:30 a.m. Welcome, introductions, workshop process—Michael Cohn, NRC 8:40 a.m. Overview of HUD objectives—Carlos Martin, HUD 8:50 a.m. Overview of the 2000-2002 NRC assessment and HUD’s current response to the NRC findings and recommendations—Manny Gonzalez, KTGY Group, Inc., Workshop Planning Committee 9:15 a.m. The value of technological innovation in home construction and the role of government/industry partnerships in promoting innovation   Sarah Slaughter 10:00 a.m. Break 10:15 a.m. Defining success and performance measures for the evaluation and management of PATH   Melvin M. Mark 11:00 a.m. Goal I—Remove barriers and facilitate technology development and adoption   Discussion Leaders John Spear, Architect/Realtor, Workshop Planning Group Dave Conover, International Code Council David Hattis, Building Technology, Inc. Bulent Kastarlak, AIA Housing Committee   Discussion Questions Is the goal communicated accurately? How important is the goal to the development and diffusion of new technology in housing? Who is the audience and how do they define success? Are there performance measures to measure success? 12:00 p.m. Lunch 1:00 p.m. Goal II—Improve technology transfer, development, and adoption through information dissemination Page 56 Front Matter (R1-R10) 1 Introduction (1-2) 2 Overview of the HUD Objectives (3-4) 3 Overview of the 2003 NRC Assessment of PATH and HUD's Current Response (5-5) 4 The Value of Technological Innovation in Home Construction and the Role of Government/Industry Partnerships in Promoting Innovation (6-16) 5 Defining Success and Performance Measures for the Evaluation and Management of PATH (17-22) 6 Discussion of PATH Goal I--Remove Barriers and Facilitate Technology Development and Adoption (23-30) 7 Discussion of PATH Goal II--Improve Technology Transfer, Development, and Adoption Through Information Dissemination (31-37) 8 Discussion of PATH Goal III--Advance Housing Technologies Research and Foster Development of New Technology (38-43) 9 PATH Forward--Program Plan and Performance Measures (44-52) Appendix A Statement of Work (53-53) Appendix B Biographical Sketches of Workshop Planning Group Members and Key Presenter (54-55) Appendix C Workshop Agenda and Participants (56-58) Appendix D Summary Operating Plan and Performance Measures (59-89) Appendix E Additional Comments and Observations of Workshop Participants (90-98)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 56
Proceedings of a Workshop to Review PATH Strategy, Operating Plan, and Performance Measures C Workshop Agenda and Participants DECEMBER 9, 2005, AGENDA 8:30 a.m. Welcome, introductions, workshop process—Michael Cohn, NRC 8:40 a.m. Overview of HUD objectives—Carlos Martin, HUD 8:50 a.m. Overview of the 2000-2002 NRC assessment and HUD’s current response to the NRC findings and recommendations—Manny Gonzalez, KTGY Group, Inc., Workshop Planning Committee 9:15 a.m. The value of technological innovation in home construction and the role of government/industry partnerships in promoting innovation   Sarah Slaughter 10:00 a.m. Break 10:15 a.m. Defining success and performance measures for the evaluation and management of PATH   Melvin M. Mark 11:00 a.m. Goal I—Remove barriers and facilitate technology development and adoption   Discussion Leaders John Spear, Architect/Realtor, Workshop Planning Group Dave Conover, International Code Council David Hattis, Building Technology, Inc. Bulent Kastarlak, AIA Housing Committee   Discussion Questions Is the goal communicated accurately? How important is the goal to the development and diffusion of new technology in housing? Who is the audience and how do they define success? Are there performance measures to measure success? 12:00 p.m. Lunch 1:00 p.m. Goal II—Improve technology transfer, development, and adoption through information dissemination

OCR for page 57
Proceedings of a Workshop to Review PATH Strategy, Operating Plan, and Performance Measures   Discussion Leaders Manny Gonzalez, KTGY Group, Inc., Workshop Planning Group Randall A. Cantrell, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University and NAHBRC   Discussion Questions Is the goal communicated accurately? How important is the goal to the development and diffusion of new technology in housing? Who is the audience and how do they define success? Are there performance measures to measure success? 2:00 p.m. Goal III—Advance housing technologies research and foster development of new technology   Discussion Leaders Jorge Vanegas, Georgia Institute of Technology, Workshop Planning Group Matt Syal, Michigan State University Chris White, National Institute of Standards and Technology   Discussion Questions Is the goal communicated accurately? How important is the goal to the development and diffusion of new technology in housing? Who is the audience and how do they define success? Are there performance measures to measure success? 3:00 p.m. Break 3:15 p.m. PATH forward—The program plan and performance measures—Wrap-up discussion   Discussion Leaders Mel Mark, Pennsylvania State University, Workshop Planning Group Anny Wong, RAND Mike Luzier, NAHB Mike Chapman, Chapman Homes, PATH Industry Committee   Discussion Questions Is the draft strategy and operating plan the right paradigm? How do we define programmatic success? How are priorities established and what should they be? What are realistic goals given the current funding level? How could these goals change if the funding level changed? Possible strategies for the dissemination of this information to interested parties in the homebuilding industry 4:30 p.m. Adjourn

OCR for page 58
Proceedings of a Workshop to Review PATH Strategy, Operating Plan, and Performance Measures PARTICIPANTS Anton Aramayo, University of Wisconsin-Madison Bill Asdal, Asdal & Co. Builders C. Edward Barbour, Navigant Consulting Matt Barnum, McGraw-Hill Construction Luis Borray, Department of Housing and Urban Development Liza K. Bowles, Newport Partners Dana Bres, Department of Housing and Urban Development Hayden Brown, National Institute of Standards and Technology Wendy Butler Burt, Department of Energy Randall A. Cantrell, National Association of Home Builders Research Center Valerie J. Caracelli, Government Accountability Office Michael Chapman, Chapman Homes Michael Cohn, National Research Council, BICE Dave Conover, International Code Council Don Cotchen, McGraw-Hill Construction Michael Crosbie, Steven Winter Associates, Inc. Paul Emrath, National Association of Home Builders Housing Policy Research David Engel, Department of Housing and Urban Development Michael Freedberg, Department of Housing and Urban Development Manuel Gonzalez, KTGY Group, Inc. Makarand (Mark) Hastak, Purdue University David Hattis, Building Technology, Inc. Ross Heitzmann, National Association of Home Builders Research Center Mark Hodges, K. Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. Adam Hoffberg, Office of Management and Budget Rick Jackson, FIATECH Bulent Kastarlak, AIA Housing Research Committee Kevin Lewis, National Research Council, BICE Michael Luzier, National Association of Home Builders Research Center Melvin Mark, Pennsylvania State University Carlos Martin, Department of Housing and Urban Development John Nosse, International Code Council William O’Brien, University of Texas, Austin James Petersen, Pulte Homes Todd Richardson, Department of Housing and Urban Development Jennifer Rivera, D&R International, Ltd. Michele Russo, McGraw-Hill Construction Stephanie L. Shipman, Government Accountability Office Sarah Slaughter, MOCA Systems John K. Spear, architect and realtor Barry Steffen, Department of Housing and Urban Development Matt Syal, Michigan State University Douglas Thomas, National Institute of Standards and Technology Jorge A. Vanegas, Texas A&M University Mike Weber, Portland Cement Association Chris White, National Institute of Standards and Technology Anny Wong, RAND Joseph L. Wysocki, U.S. Department of Agriculture, CSREES

Representative terms from entire chapter:

workshop planning