National Academies Press: OpenBook

Studying Media Effects on Children and Youth: Improving Methods and Measures: Workshop Summary (2006)

Chapter: 4 Methodological Questions, Challenges, and Opportunities

« Previous: 3 The Current State of Media Research
Suggested Citation:"4 Methodological Questions, Challenges, and Opportunities." National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. 2006. Studying Media Effects on Children and Youth: Improving Methods and Measures: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11706.
×

Chapter 4
Methodological Questions, Challenges, and Opportunities

The overview of current research methods generated a variety of ideas about ongoing challenges in media research, at both a practical and a theoretical level. To start, participants pointed out, at a time when new forms of media are proliferating, the field lacks operational definitions both of what constitutes a medium of interest from a public health perspective and of what counts as media exposure. Current distinctions among media are platform-based; that is, they are based on the kind of technology that determines the way they operate. Yet the rapid arrival of new technologies is blurring the uses of electronic devices, now that computers and handheld devices can be used for activities traditionally available only with a television or radio, and so on. Electronic toys and other new gadgets are likely to further complicate the question until the field can develop a functional, comprehensive definition.

The definition of media use is complicated by the fact that different media require different kinds of processing and yield different kinds of interactions. For example, the nature of a child’s experience with ambient media (such as music, which may be prevalent in multiple settings) may be substantially different from the experience with media that is confined to certain times of the day or certain locations. Questions of attention, of what else is taking place in the vicinity of the media user, and of new roles that media experiences may play in people’s lives are not generally taken into account conceptually or methodologically, yet they may be critical to understanding how this powerful influence really affects people.

On a practical level, the field lacks baseline information about some of the fundamental processes of concern in this kind of research, Anderson and others noted. Such processes may include information retrieval patterns, attention, memory, pattern recognition, and the ways in which children interpret narratives. To understand the ways in which users interact with media, for example, it would be useful to have a clear taxonomy of the technical design features used in many media, such as cuts, zooms, screen sizes, and the like. Similarly, existing descriptive research about eye-tracking patterns and other physiological processes as they relate to media exposure is not sufficient. For example, Anderson noted, thousands of EEG (electroencephalogram) and ERP studies have been done in other clinical and psychological studies, but their potential for improving understanding of media effects has not been fully explored. A far more detailed understanding of how the brain responds to media stimuli, as well as how cognition and behavior are affected in turn, would be possible if a stronger taxonomy to classify media technologies based on their design features was available.

Concerns such as these are linked to broader issues and to research questions in related fields. In order to understand how media exposure might affect children’s attention spans, for example, one must begin with a theory of how certain internal

Suggested Citation:"4 Methodological Questions, Challenges, and Opportunities." National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. 2006. Studying Media Effects on Children and Youth: Improving Methods and Measures: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11706.
×

processes and ecological interactions contribute to the development of attention. Without that understanding, it is difficult to identify the effects of rapid scene changes or other specific aspects of media exposure on natural or unusual developmental processes. This kind of investigation is truly interdisciplinary, Anderson pointed out. The lack of a disciplinary “home” for this type of research has contributed to its marginal status in many research centers and the lack of systematic training and the development of rigorous theoretical frameworks, causing its importance to be often overlooked.

A number of participants stressed the point that, although available research methods may be unsatisfying in some respects, existing methods and levels of precision are sufficient to begin to address important questions. For example, differences in the exposure of socioeconomic subgroups to various media—and possible differences in the resulting effects on groups—can be identified using large-scale surveillance studies. The degree of accuracy typical of current studies would be sufficient for exploring potentially significant differences in the overall media diets of different groups, but relatively little has been done in this area.

AN ECOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF YOUTH AND THE MEDIA

Susan McHale brought the perspective of a researcher in human development and family studies to bear on the analysis of media influences on developmental processes and family interactions. She began with a reference to the theory of the ecology of children’s development, a model developed by Uri Bronfenbrenner in the late 1970s. In this “onion” model, the child is seen as nested within successively more distal layers of environmental influences, the impact of each of which is mediated by the impact of the others. In this model, media are placed in the outermost layer, along with cultural attitudes and values, influencing children from some distance. In Bronfenbrenner’s view, each of these influences can affect a child’s interactions, and the focus of attention should be “molar activities”—those the child chooses in a particular setting and that therefore reflect his or her predilections, opportunities, and constraints.

The ecological approach calls attention to who is participating in an activity, how it is carried out, and why it is undertaken. With regard to television viewing, for example, the important questions are, Who turns on the TV in this kind of family? Who decides what will be watched? What kinds of conversations accompany TV viewing? An ecological perspective is not a theory but a perspective from which processes—or they might be termed mechanisms or mediators—work. Much of the research on children’s time use has focused on links between activities and outcomes, but this approach does not directly address the ways in which selected activities produce outcomes. Using an ecological approach, a researcher would dig much deeper into the patterns of social interactions and relationships that influence development. For example, if a family watches television during dinner time, the nature and form of exposure may be affected by the conversation among family members. Conversely, the timing or setting of the dinner event itself may be affected by certain media features or programs.

Daily activities, such as media consumption, are viewed as both the causes and consequences of development. The focus is on the social and psychological processes that link the activities to development and on identifying discrete interactions in these processes that may be influenced by variations in the characteristics that children,

Suggested Citation:"4 Methodological Questions, Challenges, and Opportunities." National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. 2006. Studying Media Effects on Children and Youth: Improving Methods and Measures: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11706.
×

adolescents, or families bring to the activities or the contexts in which they live. By improving understanding of the mediating processes that link activities (media consumption) to outcomes of interest, researchers can assess the strength of hypotheses about the causes of particular outcomes.

Suggested Citation:"4 Methodological Questions, Challenges, and Opportunities." National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. 2006. Studying Media Effects on Children and Youth: Improving Methods and Measures: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11706.
×
Page 13
Suggested Citation:"4 Methodological Questions, Challenges, and Opportunities." National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. 2006. Studying Media Effects on Children and Youth: Improving Methods and Measures: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11706.
×
Page 14
Suggested Citation:"4 Methodological Questions, Challenges, and Opportunities." National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. 2006. Studying Media Effects on Children and Youth: Improving Methods and Measures: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11706.
×
Page 15
Next: 5 Perspectives from Other Kinds of Epidemiological Research »
Studying Media Effects on Children and Youth: Improving Methods and Measures: Workshop Summary Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $21.00 Buy Ebook | $16.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The presence and intensity of media influences television, radio, music, computers, films, videos, and the Internet are increasingly recognized as an important part of the social ecology of children and youth, and these influences have become more visible and volatile in recent decades. Research that explores the level and effects of media influences calls for measurements of the quantity and character of exposure to a variety of potentially overlapping media sources, an analysis of the content of the media output, and examination of the social context and relationships that are associated with the media experience.

Recognizing the importance of this research, the Board on Children, Youth, and Families, under the auspices of the National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine, and with the sponsorship of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, held a workshop in March 2006. Its purpose was twofold: to examine the quality of the measures used in studies of the effects of media on children's health and development and to identify gaps in both research and practice. The goal was for a variety of experts to consider steps and strategies that could move this research forward and improve its utility for helping parents, practitioners, and policy makers guide young people in navigating a media-rich environment.

Studying Media Effects on Children and Youth provides a summary of that discussion, supplemented with information from two papers prepared for the workshop. It begins with an examination of the potential impact of media exposure, followed by a description of the basic research questions and the methods currently used to study them. Methodological questions and challenges and theoretical approaches are described; they are discussed from the perspective of other kinds of epidemiological research. This report closes with a discussion of future directions for the field.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!