Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 275
Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Appendix D References Aberson CL, M Healy, and V Romero (2000). Ingroup bias and self-esteem: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review 4:157-173. Adelman C (1999). Answers in the toolbox: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor’s degree attainment (PLLI 1999-8021). Washington, DC: US Department of Education. Adelman CL (2006). The Toolbox Revisited: Paths to Degree Completion from High School through College. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/toolboxrevisit/toolbox.pdf. Akerlind I, K Alexanderson, G Hensing, M Liejon, and P Bjurulf (1996). Sex differences in absence in relation to parental status. Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine 24(1): 27-35. Alderfer CP (1992). Changing race relations embedded in organizations: Report on a longterm project with the XYZ corporation. In ed. SE Jackson, Diversity in the Workplace: Human Resources Initiatives. New York: Guilford Press. Alessio JC and J Andrzejski (2000). Unveiling the hidden glass ceiling. American Sociological Review 26(2):311-315. Allison P and S Long (1990). Departmental effects on scientific productivity. American Sociological Review 55:119-125. Altonji JG and RM Blank (1999). Race and gender in the labor market. In eds. O Ashenfelter and D Card, Handbook of Labor Economics, Volume 3, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. American Association of University Professors (2001). Statement on Principles of Family Responsibilities and Work, http://www.aaup.org/statements/REPORTS/re01fam.htm. American Association of University Women (2004). Tenure Denied. Cases of Sex Discrimination in Academia. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation and Legal Advocacy Fund. American Chemical Society (2006). Directory of Graduate Research. Washington, DC: Ameri-can Chemical Society.
OCR for page 276
Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering American Council on Education (2005). An Agenda for Excellence: Creating Flexibility in Tenure-Track Faculty Careers, Executive Summary, http://www.acenet.edu/bookstore/pdf/2005_tenure_flex_summary.pdf. American Physical Society. Improving the Climate for Women Site Visits, http://www.aps.org/educ/cswp/visits/index.cfm. American Psychological Association (2000). Women in Academe: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back, http://www.apa.org/pi/wpo/academe/report.html. American Society for Cell Biology Web page, http://www.ascb.org/. Anderson DJ and JJ Cheslock (2004). Institutional strategies to achieve gender equity in intercollegiate athletics: Does Title IX harm male athletes? American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 94(2):307-311. Antonio A (2003). Diverse student bodies, diverse faculties. Academe 89(6):14-18. Antonio A (2002). Faculty of color reconsidered: Reassessing contributions to scholarship. Journal of Higher Education 73:582-602. Ash A, P Carr, R Goldstein, and RH Friedman (2004). Compensation and advancement of women in academic medicine: Is there equity. Annals of Internal Medicine 141(3): 205-212. Association of American Law Schools (1996). Retaining faculty of color. AALS Newsletter, http://www.aals.org/mlt3.html. Association of American Medical Colleges (2005). Analysis in Brief: The Changing Representation of Men and Women in Academic Medicine. Washington, DC: AAMC. Association of American Medical Colleges. Faculty Roster, http://www.aamc.org/data/facultyroster/start.htm. Association of American Medical Colleges. FAMOUS User’s Guide, http://www.aamc.org/data/facultyroster/famous.pdf. Association of American Medical Colleges. Reports Available Through Faculty Roster, http://www.aamc.org/data/facultyroster/reports.htm. Astin, HS (2005). Annual Survey of the American Freshman, National Norms. Los Angeles, CA: High Education Research Institute. Astin HS and LJ Sax (1996). Developing scientific talent in undergraduate women In eds. CS Davis, AB Ginorio, BB Hollenshead, and PM Rayman. The Equity Equation: Fostering the Advancement of Women in the Sciences, Mathematics and Engineering. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers. August L and J Waltman (2004). Culture, climate, and contribution: Career satisfaction among female faculty. Research in Higher Education 45(2):177-192. Baginole B (1993). How to keep a good woman down: An investigation of the role of institutional factors in the process of discrimination against women academics. British Journal of Sociology of Education 14(3):261-274. Baillargeon R, L Kotovksy, and A Needham (1995). The acquisition of physical knowledge in infancy. In eds. D Sperber and D Premack, Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Debate (pp 79-116), New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press. Ball P (2006). Prestige is factored into journal ratings. Nature 439(16):770-771. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v439/n7078/pdf/439770a.pdf. Banaji MR and AG Greenwald (1995). Implicit gender stereotyping in judgments of fame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68:181-198. Barbezat D (1992). The market for new PhD economists. Journal of Economic Education 23:262-276. Barnes LLB, MO Agago, and WT Coombs (1998). Effects of job-related stress on faculty intention to leave academia. Research in Higher Education 39(4):457-469. Barnett R and C Rivers (2004). Same Difference: How Gender Myths Are Hurting Our Relationships, Our Children, and Our Jobs. New York: Basic Books.
OCR for page 277
Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Baron-Cohen S (2002). The Essential Difference: The Truth about the Male and the Female Brain. New York: Basic Books. Belenkey MF, BM Clincy, NR Goldberger, and JM Tarule (1986). Women’s Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind. New York: Basic Books. Bellas M (1997) Disciplinary differences in faculty salaries: Does gender play a role? Journal of Higher Education 68(3):299-321. Benbow CP (1988). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented preadolescents: Their nature, effects, and possible causes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11:169-232. Benbow C and O Arjmand (1990). Predictors of high academic achievement in mathematically talented students: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology 82: 430-441. Benbow CP, D Lubinski, DL Shea, and H Eftekhari-Sanjani (2000). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability at age 13: Their status 20 years later. Psychological Science 11(6):474-480. Benbow CP and JC Stanley (1980). Sex differences in mathematical ability: fact or artifact? Science 210:1262-1264. Benbow CP and JC Stanley (1988). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: more facts. Science 222:1029-1031. Bendick M, ML Egan, and SM Lofhjelm (1998). The Documentation and Evaluation of Anti-Discrimination Training in the United States. Geneva: International Labor Organization. Berryman SE (1983). Who Will Do Science? Minority and Female Attainment of Science and Mathematics Degrees: Trends and Causes. New York: Rockefeller Foundation. Bertrand M and S Mullianathan (2004). Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? American Economic Review 94(4):991-1013. The Best Initiative (2004), The Talent Imperative: Diversifying America’s Science and Engineering Workforce, http://www.bestworkforce.org/PDFdocs/BESTTalentImperativeFINAL.pdf. Bickel J (2000). Encouraging the advancement of women. JAMA 283(5):671. Bickel J, D Wara, BF Atkinson, LS Cohen, M Dunn, S Hostler, TRB Johnson, P Morahan, AH Rubenstein, GF Sheldon, and E Stokes (2002). Increasing women’s leadership in academic medicine: Report of the AAMC project implementation committee. Academic Medicine 77(10):1043-1061. Bielby WT (2000). Minimizing workplace gender and racial bias. Contemporary Sociology (29)12-129. Biernat M and ER Thompson (2002). Shifting standards and contextual variation in stereotyping. European Review of Social Psychology 12:103-137. Blalock HM (1957). Precent non-white and discrimination in the South. American Sociological Review 22:677-682. Blank RM (1991). The effects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: Experimental evidence from the American Economic Review. American Economic Review 81:1041-1067. Blau PM (1977). Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York: Free Press. Bobo LD (2001). Racial attitudes and relations at the close of the twentieth century. In eds. NJ Smelser, America Becoming: Racial Trends and their Consequences, Vol. 1. WJ Wilson, and F Mitchell, Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Boyer E (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of a Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Brainard SG and L Carlin (1997). A Longitudinal Study of Undergraduate Women in Engineering and Science, http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie97/papers/1252.pdf.
OCR for page 278
Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Brewer MB (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love of outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues 55:429-444. Brewer MB and R Brown (1998). Intergroup relations. In eds. D Gilbert, ST Fiske, and G Lindzy, The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill. Brewster KL and RR Rindfuss (2000). Fertility and women’s employment in industrialized nations. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 271-296. Bridgeman B and C Wendler (1991). Gender differences in predictors of college mathematics performance and in college mathematics course grades. Journal of Educational Psychology 83(2):275-284. Broder I (1993). Review of NSF economics proposals: Gender and institutional patterns. American Economic Review 83:964-970. Brody LE and CJ Mills (2005). Talent search research: What have we learned? High Ability Studies 16(1):97-111. Bronstein P and L Farnsworth (1998). Gender differences in faculty experiences of interpersonal climate and processes for advancement. Research in Higher Education 39(5):557-585. Brown A, W Swinyard, and J Ogle (2003). Women in academic medicine: A report of focus groups and questionnaires, with conjoint analysis. Journal of Women’s Health 12(10):999-1008. Brown KH and D Gillespie (1999). Responding to moral distress in the university: Augusto Boal’s theater of the oppressed. Change (September-October):34-39. Browne KR (2002). Biology at Work. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Bullers S (1999). Selection effects in the relationship between women’s work/family status and perceived control. Family Relations: Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies 48(2):181-188. Burke D (1988). A New Academic Marketplace. New York: Greenwood Press. Burroughs Wellcome Fund and Howard Hughes Medical Institute (2004). Making the Right Moves: A Practical Guide to Scientific Management for Postdocs and New Faculty, http://www.hhmi.org/labmanagement. Byrnes JP, H Li, and X Xhaoging (1997). Gender differences on the math subset of the scholastic aptitutde test may be culture specific. Educational Studies in Mathematics 34:49-66. Calas M and L Smircich (1993). Dangerous liaisons: The feminine-in-management meets globalization. Business Horizons 36(2):71-81. Callister RR (2006). The impact of gender and department climate on job satisfaction and intentions to quit for faculty in science and engineering fields. Journal of Technology Transfer 31:367-375. Campbell G, R Denes, and C Morrison (2000). Access denied: Race, ethnicity, and the scientific enterprise. New York: Oxford University Press. Campbell JR, CM Hombo, and J Mazzeo (2000). NAEP 1999 Trends in Academic Progress: Three Decades of Student Performance. (NCES 2000-469). Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Carnes M (2006). Gender: Macho language and other deterrents. Nature 442:868. Carnes M, S Geller, E. Fine, J Sheridan, and J. Handelsman (2005). NIH Director’s Pioneer Awards: Could the selection process be biased against women? Journal of Women’s Health 14(8):684-691. Case A and C Paxson (2005). Sex differences in morbidity and mortality. Demography 42(2):189-214. Casey MB, RL Nuttall, and E Pezaris (1997). Mediators of gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores: A comparison of spatial skills with internalized beliefs and anxieties. Developmental Psychology 33(4):669-680.
OCR for page 279
Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Casey MB, R Nuttall, E Pezaris, and CP Benbow (1995). The influence of spatial ability differences in mathematics college entrance scores across diverse samples. Developmental Psychology 31(4):697-705. Cheng K (2005). Reflections on geometry and navigation. Connection Science 17(1-2):5-21. Chesler N and M Chesler (2005). Theater as a community-building strategy for women in engineering: Theory and practice. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 11(1):83-96. Chliwniak L (1997). Higher Education Leadership: Analyzing the Gender Gap. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report ED 410 847. Washington, DC: George Washington University. The Clare Boothe Luce Program. Proposal Guidelines for Invited Colleges/Universities, http://www.hluce.org/4cbldefm.html. Clegg R (2006). Faculty hiring preferences and the law. Chronicle of Higher Education 52(37):B13. Cohen J (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Science, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Cohen GL, J Garcia, N Apfel, and A Master. (2006) Reducing the racial achievement gap: A social-psychological intervention. Science 313:1307-1310. Cohen-Bendahan CCC, C van de Beek, and SA Berenbaum (2005). Prenatal sex hormone effects on child and adult sex-typed behavior: Methods and findings. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 29:353-384. Cole JR and H Zuckerman (1984). The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publication of men and women scientists. Advances in Motivation and Achievement 2:217-258. Collins DW and D Kimura (1997). A large sex difference on a two-dimensional mental rotation task. Behavioral Neuroscience 111(4):845-849. Columbia University (2005). Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons Task Force on Women Faculty Report February 2005. http://www/cumc.columbia.edu/dept/ps/facultycouncil/docs/TaskForceonWomen Faculty Final Report 02_24_05.doc. Colwell R (2002). Rethinking the Rules to Promote Diversity. NSF Director Rita R. Colwell’s Remarks to the American Chemical Society, http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/forum/colwell/rc02081acsdiversity.htm. Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology (2002). Professional Women and Minorities: A Total Human Resources Data Compendium, 14th ed. Washington, DC: Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology. Committee on Women in Science and Engineering. Gender Faculty Studies at Research 1 Institutions, http://www7.nationalacademies.org/cwse/gender_faculty_links.html. Condry SM and JC Condry (1976). Sex differences: A study of the eye of the beholder. Child Development 47:812-819. Condry SM, JC Condry, and LW Pogatshnik (1983). Sex differences: A study of the ear of the beholder. Sex Roles 9(6):697-705. Congressional Commission on the Advancement of Women and Minorities in Science, Engineering, and Technology Development (CAWMSET) (2004). Land of Plenty: Diversity as America’s Competitive Edge in Science, Engineering, and Technology, http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2000/cawmset0409/cawmset_0409.pdf. Connellan J, S Baron-Cohen, S Wheelwright, A Batki, and J Ahluwalia (2000). Sex differences in human neonatal social perception. Infant Behavior and Development 23:113-118. Corley E and M Gaughan (2005). Scientists’ participation in university research centers: What are the gender differences? Journal of Technology Transfer 30:371-381. Cornell University Child Care Grant Subsidy Program, http://www.ohr.cornell.edu/benefits/childcareGrant/index.html.
OCR for page 280
Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Correll SJ and S Benard (2005). Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty? Presentation at American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, August 15, 2005, Philadelphia, PA, http://sociology.princeton.edu/programs/workshops/Correll_Benard_manuscript.pdf. Couzin J (2006). US rules on accounting for grants amount to more than a hill of beans. Science 311:168-169. Cox TH (1993). Cultural Diversity in Organizations: Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco: Berrett-Keohler. Creamer EG (1998). Assessing faculty publication productivity: Issues of equity (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report 26(2)). Washington, DC: George Washington University. Crocker J and KM McGraw (1984). What’s good for the goose is not good for the gander: Solo status as an obstacle to occupational achievement for males and females. American Behavioral Scientist 27(3):357-369. Crowley K, MA Callanan, HR Tenenbaum, and E Allen (2001). Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science 12(3):258-261. Curtis JW (2004). Balancing work and family for faculty: Why it’s important. Academe 90(6), http://www.aaup.org/publications/Academe/2004/04nd/04ndtoc.htm. Custred G and T Wood (1996). California’s Proposition 209, http://www.acri.org/209/ 209text.html. Davenport DS and JM Yurich (1991). Multicultural gender issues. Journal of Counseling and Development 70(1):64-71. Davies PG, SJ Spencer, and CM Steele (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88:276-287. Davies PG, SJ Spencer, DM Quinn, and R Gerhardstein (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28(12):1615-1628. Davis G (2005). Optimizing the Postdoctoral Experience: An Empirical Approach (Working Paper). Research Triangle Park, NC: Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society. Davison HK and MJ Burke (2000). Sex discrimination in simulated employment contexts: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Vocational Behavior 56:225-248. Dawson MRW and DA Medler. Dictionary of Cognitive Science, http://www.bcp.psych.ualberta.ca/~mike/Pearl_Street/Dictionary/contents/C/cognitive_psychology.html. DeAngelis C (2000). Women in academic medicine: New insights, same sad news. New England Journal of Medicine 342(6):426-427. Delazer M (2003). Sex differences in cognitive functions. Personality and Individual Differences 35(4):863-875. Deloitte and Touche (2005). Why Flexible Work Arrangements Are Not the Answer: The Case for Career Customization (internal document). Desai S and LJ Waite (1991). Women’s employment during pregnancy and after the first birth: Occupational characteristics and work commitment. American Sociological Review 56(4):551-566. Devine PG and AJ Elliott (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton Trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 21:1139-1150. Didion CJ, MA Fox, and ME Jones (1998). Cultivating Academic Careers: AWIS project on academic climate. AWIS Magazine 27(1):23-27, http://www.awis.org/pubs/mentoring/98winter.pdf. Di Stefano C (1990). Dilemmas of difference: Feminism, modernity, and postmodernism. In Feminism/Postmodernism. New York: Routledge. Dobbin F and A Kalev (2006). Diversity Management and Managerial Diversity: Addendum to “Best Practices or Best Guesses.” Special Report to the National Academies Committee on Women in Academic Science and Engineering.
OCR for page 281
Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Dooris MJ and M Guidos (2006). Tenure Achievement Rates at Research Universities, Presentation at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Chicago, IL, May 2006. http://www/psu.edu/president/pia/planning_research/reports/AIR_Tenure_Flow_Paper_06.pdf. Drago R (2006). The value of work-family policies. In Biological, Social, and Organizational Components of Success for Women in Academic Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Drago R and C Colbeck (2003). Final Report from the Mapping Project: Exploring the Terrain of U.S. Colleges and Universities for Faculty and Families. http://lsir.la.psu.edu/workfam/mappingproject.htm. Drago R, C Colbeck, KD Stauffer, A Pirretti, K Burkum, J Fazioli, G Lazarro, and T Habasevich (2005). Bias against caregiving. Academe 91(6), http://www.aaup.org/publications/Academe/2005/05so/05sodrag.htm. Dundar H and DR Lewis (1998). Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education 39(6):607-631. Eagly AH and MC Johannesen-Schmidt MC (2001). The leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues 57(4):781-797. Eagly AH and SJ Karau (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review 109:573-598. Eccles JS (1994). Women’s educational and occupational choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly 18:585-609. Edmonson Bell ELJ and SM Nkomo (2001). Our Separate Ways: Black and White Women and the Struggle for Personal Identity. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Education Sector (2006). The Truth About Boys and Girls. Washington, DC: Education Sector. Educational Studies in Mathematics 34:49-66. Ehrenberg RG, MJ Rizzo, and GH Jakubson (2003). Who bears the growing cost of science at universities? (Working Paper 9627). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, http://www.nber.org/papers/w9627. Ely R (2004). A field study of group diversity, participation in diversity education programs and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior 25(6):755-780. Ely RJ and DE Meyerson (2000). Theories of gender in organizations: A new approach to organizational analysis and change. Research in Organizational Behavior 22:105-153. Ely RJ and DA Thomas (2001). Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes. Administrative Science Quarterly 46: 202-228. England P (1992). Comparable Worth: Theories and Evidence. New York: Aldine de Gruyter. England P, P Allison, S Li, N Mark, J Thompson, M Budig, and H Sun (2004). Why Are Some Academic Fields Tipping Toward Female? The Sex Composition of US Fields of Doctoral Degree Receipt, 1971-1998, http://www.stanford.edu/dept/soc/people/faculty/england/Tipping.pdf. Epstein CF (1988). Deceptive Distinctions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Etaugh C and G Gilomen (1989). Perceptions of mothers: Effects of employment status, marital status, and age of child. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 20:59-70. Etaugh C and C Moss (2001). Attitudes of employed women toward parents who choose fulltime or part-time employment following their child’s birth. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 44:611-619. Etzkowitz, C Kemelgor, M Neuschatz, and N Uzzi (1994). Barriers to women in academic science and engineering. In eds. W Pearson Jr. and I Fechter, Who Will Do Science? Educating the Next Generation, Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
OCR for page 282
Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Evans ME, H Schweingruber, and HW Stevenson (2002). Gender differences in interest and knowledge acquisition: The United States, Taiwan, and Japan. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 47(3-4):153-167. Executive Summary from Task Force Report on Women in Science and Engineering (2005). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/daily/2005/05/wise_summary.pdf. European Science Foundation (2002). Towards a new paradigm of education, training, and career paths in the natural sciences European Foundation Policy Brief 16, http://www.esf.org/publication/139/ESPB16.pdf#SEARCH=%22Torsten%20Wiesel%20training%20paradigm%22. Faculty Diversity Committee, Northwestern University 2004. http://www.northwestern.edu/provost/committees/diversity/reports.html. Flax J (1990). Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory. In ed. LJ Nicholson, Feminism/Postmodernism. New York: Routledge. Fell A (2005). New program to improve lab management. Dateline UC-Davis, http://www.dateline.ucdavis.edu/dl_detail.lasso?id=8404. Ferber MA and M Teiman (1980). Are women economists at a disadvantage in publishing journal articles? Eastern Economic Journal 6(3-4):189-193. Fidell L (1970). Empirical verification of sex discrimination in hiring practices in psychology. American Psychologist 25:1094-1098. Fine E and J Sheridan (2006). Searching for Excellence & Diversity—Training Workshops for Search Committees. Poster presentation, 5th Annual ADVANCE Institutional Transformation Principal Investigators Meeting. Washington, DC, May 17, http://wiseli.engr.wisc.edu/initiatives/hiring/UWMadison_Poster2006_2.ppt. Fisher M, SB Friedman, and B Strauss (1994). The effects of blinding on acceptance of research papers by peer review. JAMA 272:143-146. Fiske ST, M Linn, and SL Neuberg (1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In eds. S Chaiken and Y Trope, Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology. New York: Guilford Press. Fletcher J (2001). Disappearing Acts. Gender, Power, and Relational Practice at Work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Forsburg S (2004). Ensuring diversity at the podium. The ASCB Newsletter 27(2):13-14. Fox MF (2005). Gender, family characteristics, and publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science 35(1):131-150. Fox MF (1992). Research, teaching, and publication productivity: Mutuality versus competition in academia. Sociology of Education 65(4):293-305. Fox MF (1985). Publication, performance and reward in science and scholarship. In ed. JC Smart, Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. 1. New York: Agathon. Fox MF and JS Long (1995). Scientific careers: Universalism and particularism. Annual Review of Sociology 21:45-71. Fox MF and P Stephan (2001). Careers of young scientists: Preferences, prospects and realities by gender and field. Social Studies of Science 31(1):109-122. Frank RH (1978). Family location constraints and the geographic distribution ofd female professionals. Journal of Political Economy 86:117-130. Franke GR, DF Crown, and DF Spake (1997). Gender differences in ethical perceptions of business practice: A social role theory perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology 82:920-934; 17. Franklin JH (2005). Mirror to America. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. Postdoc Childcare Subsidy Program, http://www.fhcrc.org/science/education/grad_postdoc/spac/childcare/index.html.
OCR for page 283
Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Freeman R, E Jin, and C-Y Shen (2004). Where Do New US-Trained Science-Engineering PhDs Come From? (NBER Working Paper 10554). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Fried LP, CA Francomano, SM MacDonald, EM Wagner, EJ Stokes, KM Carbone, WB Bias, MM Newman, and JD Stobo (1996). Career development for women in academic medicine: Multiple interventions in a department of medicine. Journal of the American Medical Association 276(11):898-905. Frost JA, JR Binder, JA Springer, TA Hammeke, PSF Bellgowan, SM Rao, and RB Cox (1999). Language processing is strongly lateralized in both sexes. Brain 122(2):199-208. Gaertner SL, JF Dovidio, BS Banker, MC Rust, JA Nier, GR Mottola, and CM Ward (2003). The challenge of aversive racism: Combating pro-white bias. In ed. S Plous, Understanding Prejudice and Discrimination. New York: McGraw-Hill. Gallagher A, JY Levin, and C Cahalan (2002). Cognitive Patterns of Gender Differences on Mathematics Admissions Tests (GRE Board Professional Report No. 96-17P). Washington, DC: Educational Testing Service. Gallagher A, R De Lisi, PC Holst, AV McGillicuddy-De Lisi, M Morely, and C Cahalan (2000). Gender differences in advanced mathematical problem solving. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 75:165-190. Gallagher AM and JC Kaufman (2005). Gender Differences in Mathematics. New York: Cambridge University Press. Gaughan M and S Robin (2004). National science training policy and early scientific careers in France and the United States. Research Policy 33:569-581. Geary DC (2001). Sex differences in spatial abilities among adults from the United States and China: Implications for evolutionary theory. Evolution and Cognition 7(2):172-177. Geary DC (1998). Male, Female: The Evolution of Human Sex Differences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Geary DC (1996). Sexual selection and sex differences in mathematical abilities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19:229-284. Geary DC, SJ Saults, F Liu, and MK Hoard (2000). Sex differences in spatial cognition, computational fluency, and arithmetical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 77:337-353. Georgi H (2000). The Back Page: Is there an unconscious discrimination against women in science? American Physical Society Newsletter, http://schwinger.harvard.edu/~georgi/women/backpage.htm. Gerstel N and K McGonagle (1999). Job leaves and the limits of the Family and Medical Leave Act: The effects of gender, race, and family. Work and Occupations. 26:510-534. Gilbert JA, BA Stead, and JM Ivancevich (1999). Diversity management: A new organizational paradigm. Journal of Business Ethics 21:61-76. Gilligan C (1982). In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Ginorio A (1995). Warming the Climate for Women in Academic Science. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities. Ginther D (2006). The economics of gender differences in employment outcomes in academia. In Biological, Social, and Organizational Components of Success for Women in Academic Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (In Press). Ginther D (2001). Does Science Discriminate Against Women? Evidence from Academia (Working Paper 2001-02). Atlanta, GA: Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. Ginther D and S Kahn (2006). Does Science Promote Women? Evidence from Academia 1973-2001 (NBER SEWP Working Paper). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economics Research, http://www.nber.org/~sewp/GintherKahn_Sciences_promo_NBER.pdf.
OCR for page 284
Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Gjesdal S and E Bratburg (2002). The role of gender in long-term sickness absence and transition to permanent disability benefits. The European Journal of Public Health 12(3): 180-186. Gladwell M (2000). The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Boston, MA: Little, Brown. Glick P and S Fiske (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiation hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70:491-512. Goldin C (2002). A pollution theory of discrimination: Male and female differences in occupations and earnings (Working Paper 8985). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Gmelch WH, PK Wilke, and NP Lovrich (1986). Dimensions of stress among university faculty: Factor-analytic results from a national survey. Research in Higher Education 24:266-286. Goldin C, LF Katz, and I Kuziemko (2006). The Homecoming of American College Women: The Reversal of the College Gender Gap (NBER Working Paper 12139). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Gottleib EE and B Keith (1997). The academic research-teaching nexus in eight advancedindustrialized countries. Higher Education 34:397-420. Government Accountability Office (2004). Gender Issues: Women’s Participation in the Sciences Has Increased, but Agencies Need to Do More to Ensure Compliance with Title IX (GAO-04-639). Washington, DC: US Government Accountability Office. Gutek B and B Morasch (1982). Sex ratios, sex-role spillover, and sexual harassment of women at work. Journal of Social Issues 38:55-74. Gutek BA (1985). Sex and the Workplace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Guttierez C (2001). Who will do chemistry? Chemical and Engineering News 79(21):5. Guttman JM (1996). Rational actors, tit-for-tat types, and the evolution of cooperation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 29:27-56. Hagedorn LS (2000). Conceptualizing faculty job satisfaction: Components, theories, and outcomes. New Directions for Institutional Research 105:5-20. Hagedorn LS, M Arredondo, and FA Dicrisi (2002). Faculty research productivity: Exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research in Higher Education 43(4): 423-446. Halari R, M Hines, V Kumari, R Mehrotra, M Wheeler, V Ng, and T Sharma (2005). Sex differences in individual differences in cognitive performance and their relationship to endogenous gonadal hormones and gonadatropins. Behavioral Neuroscience 119(1): 104-117. Halpern DF (2006). Biopsychosocial contributions to cognitive performance. In Biological, Social, and Organizational Contributions to Science and Engineering Success. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Halpern DF (2005). Sex, brains, hands: Gender differences in cognitive abilities. Limbic Nutrition: http://www.limibicnutrition.com/blog/archives/028860.html. Halpern DF and U Tan (2001). Stereotypes and steroids: Using a psychobiosocial model to understand cognitive sex differences. Brain and Cognition 45:392-414. Hamilton K (2002). The state of the African American professoriate. Black Issues in Higher Education 19(7):30-31. Handelsman J, N Cantor, M Carnes, D Denton, E Fine, B Grosz, V Hinshaw, C Marrett, S Rosser, D Shalala, and J Sheridan (2005). More women in science. Science 309:1190-1191, http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/309/5738/1190. Hanson SL (2004). African American women in science: Experiences from high school through the post-secondary years and beyond. NWSA Journal 16(1):96. Harding S (1986). The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
OCR for page 285
Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Harrigan MN (1999). An Analysis of Faculty Turnover at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Univerisity of Wisconsin-Madison, http://wiscweb3.wisc.edu/obpa/FacultyTurnover/FacultyTurnover2.html. Harvard University (2005). Report of the Task Force on Women Faculty, http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/daily/2005/05/women-faculty.pdf. Harvard University Dependent Care for Conference Travel Program, http://www.fas.harvard.edu/home/academic_affairs/dependent_care.pdf. Harvey WB (2003). 20th Anniversary Minorities in Higher Education Annual Status Report. Washington, DC: American Council on Education. Hausmann M, D Slabbekoorn, SHM Van Goozen, PT Cohen-Kettenis, and O Güntürkün (2000). Sex hormones affect spatial abilities during the menstrual cycle. Behavioral Neuroscience 114(6):1245-1250. Hechinger FM (1988). About Education. New York Times. B11 (November 9). Hedges LV and A Nowell (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science 269:41-45. Heilman ME, AS Wallen, D Fuchs, and MM Tamkins (2004). Penalties for success: Reactions to women who succeed at male gender-typed tasks. Journal of Applied Psychology 89(3):416-427. Hemmasi M, LA Graf, and JA Lust (1992). Correlates of pay and benefit satisfaction: The unique case of public university faculty. Public Personnel Management 21(4):442-443. Hennessey J, S Hockfield, and S Tilghman (2005). Women and science: The real issue. The Boston Globe, Feb. 12, http://www.boston.com/news/education/higher/articles/2005/02/12/women_and_science_the_real_issue/. Herlitz A, LG Nilsson, and L Baeckman (1997). Gender differences in episodic memory. Memory and Cognition 25:801-811. Hill SA (2002). Teaching and doing gender in African American families. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 47(11-12):493-506. Hilton TL and VE Lee (1988). Student interest and persistence in science. Journal of Higher Education 59(5):510-526. Hines M (2003). Sex steroids and human behavior: Prenatal androgen exposure and sex-typical play behavior in children. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1007: 272-282. Hines M, BA Fane, VL Pasterski, GA Mathews, GS Conway, and C Brook (2003). Spatial abilities following prenatal androgen abnormality: Targeting and mental rotations performance in individuals with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Psychoneuroendocrinology 28:1010-1026. Hirsh E (2006). Enforcing equal opportunity: The impact of discrimination charges on sex and race segregation in the workplace (Working Paper). Department of Sociology, University of Washington. Hoffer TB and K Grigorian (2005). All in a Week’s Work: Average Workweeks of Doctoral Scientists and Engineers (NSF 06-302). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/infobrief/nsf06302/nsf06302.pdf. Hofstede G (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Hojat M, JS Gonnella, and AS Caelleigh (2003). Impartial judgment by the “gatekeepers” of science: Fallibility and accountability in the peer review process. Advances in Health Sciences Education 8(1):75-96. Holder JC and A Vaux (1998). African American professionals: Coping with occupational stress in predominantly white environments. Journal of Vocational Behavior 53(3): 315-333.
OCR for page 290
Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Mason MA, A Stacy, and M Goulden (2003). University of California Faculty Work and Family Survey, http://ucfamilyedge.berkeley.edu/workfamily.htm. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1999). A study on the status of women faculty in science at MIT. MIT Faculty Newsletter 11(4), http://web.mit.edu/fnl/women/women.html. Masters MS and Sanders B (1993). Is the gender difference in mental rotation disappearing? Behavior Genetics 23:337-341. Mathot J (2005). Duke expands child care options. Duke News, September 9, http://www.dukenews.duke.edu/2005/09/childcare.html. Maznevski ML (1994). Understanding our differences: Performance in decision-making groups with diverse members. Human Relations 47:531-552. McCain BE, C O’Reilly, and J Pfeffer (1983). The effects of departmental demography on turnover: The case of a university. Academy of Management Journal 26:626-641. McCracken DM (2000). Winning the talent war for women. Harvard Business Review Nov/ Dec (Reprint R00611). McDowell JM, LD Singell, and M Stater (2006). Two to tango? Gender differences in the decisions to publish and coauthor. Economic Inquiry 44(1):153-168. McGlone MS and J Aronson (2006). Stereotype threat, identity salience, and spatial reasoning. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology (in press). McGrath JE, JL Berdahl, and H Arrow (1995). Traits, expectations, culture and clout: The dynamics of diversity in workgroups. In eds. SE Jackson and MD Ruderman, Diversity in Work Teams. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. McLeod PL, SA Lobel, and TH Cox (1996). Ethnic diversity and creativity in small groups. Small Group Research 27:248-265. McNutt RA, AT Evans, RH Fletcher, and SW Fletcher (1990). The effects of blinding on the quality of peer review: A randomized trial. JAMA 263(10):1371-1376. Mednick MT (1989). On the politics of psychological constructs: Stop the bandwagon, I want to get off. American Psychologist 44:1118-1123. Merton RK (1973). The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Merton RK (1968). The Matthew effect in Science. Science 158:56-63. Meyerson DE and JK Fletcher (2005). A modest manifesto for shattering the glass ceiling. In Harvard Business Review on Women in Business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School. Milem JF (2003). The educational benefits of diversity: Evidence from multiple sectors. In eds. M Chang et al., Compelling Interest: Examining the Evidence on Racial Dynamics in Higher Education. Stanford, CA: Stanford Education. Miller F (1992). Discussant commentary. Leadership Diversity Conference: Beyond Awareness into Action. Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro, NC. Mincer J (1978). Family migration decisions. Journal of Political Economy 86:749-773. Moguerou P (2002). Job Satisfaction among US PhDs: The Effects of Gender and Employment Sectors (Working Paper), http://www.rennes.inra.fr/jma2002/pdf/moguerou.pdf. Monks J (2005). Title IX Compliance and Preference for Men in College Admission (Working Paper 80). Ithaca, NY: Cornell Higher Education Research Institute, http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/cheri/wp/cheri_wp80.pdf. Morgan C, JD Isaac, and C Sansone (2001). The role of interest in understanding the career choices of female and male college students. Sex Roles 44(5-6):295-320. Morrison A (1996). The New Leaders: Leadership Diversity in America. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Morrison AM (1992). New solutions to the same old glass ceiling. Women in Management Review 7(4):15-19.
OCR for page 291
Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Moses Y (1989). Black Women in Academe: Issues and Strategies. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges. Myers SL and CS Turner (2004). The effects of PhD supply on minority faculty representation. The American Economic Review 94(2):296-301. Naff KC and JE Kellough (2003). Ensuring employment equity: Are federal diversity programs making a difference? International Journal of Public Administration 26(12):1307-1336. NAS/NAE/IOM (2007). Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. NAS/NAE/IOM (2005). Policy Implications of International Graduate Students and Postdoctoral Scholars in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. NAS/NAE/IOM (2004). Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. NAS/NAE/IOM (1997). Adviser, Teacher, Role Model, Friend: On Being a Mentor to Students in Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Center for Education Statistics (2004). Trends in Educational Equity of Girls and Women: 2004 (NCES 2005-016). Washington, DC: US Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics (2002). Digest of Education Statistics, 2002 (NCES 2003060) Washington, DC: US Department of Education Statistics National Center for Education Statistics (2000). Trends in Educational Equity of Girls and Women: 2000 (NCES 2000-030). Washington, DC: US Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics (1997). The Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, http://www.ed.gov/nces. National Institutes of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Primary Caregiver Technical Assistance Supplements, http://www.niaid.nih.gov/ncn/training/pctas.htm. National Research Council (2004). Measuring Racial Discrimination. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council (2001). From Scarcity to Visibility: Gender Differences in the Careers of Doctoral Scientists and Engineers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council (1996). The National Scholars Program: Excellence with Diversity for the Future. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council (1996). The Path to the PhD. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council (1995). Research Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council (1992). Science and Engineering Programs: On Target for Women? Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council (1991). Women in Science and Engineering: Increasing Their Numbers the 1990s: A Statement on Policy and Strategy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Research Council 1989. Everybody Counts: A Report to the Nation on the Future of Mathematics Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. National Science Board (2006). Science and Engineering Indicators, 2006. (NSB 06-02) Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation, Appendix Table 1-17. National Science Board (2004). Science and Engineering Indicators, 2004 (NSB 04-01). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. National Science Foundation (2006). Survey of Doctoral Recipients, 2003. Arlington, VA. National Science Foundation.
OCR for page 292
Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering National Science Foundation (2004). Gender Differences in the Careers of Academic Scientists and Engineers (NSF 04-323). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. National Science Foundation (2004). Graduate Students and Postdoctorates in Science and Engineering. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. National Science Foundation (2004). Women, Minorities and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering, 2004. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. National Science Foundation (2003). Survey of Earned Doctorates, 2003. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. National Science Foundation (1999). Survey of Doctoral Recipients. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Nelson DJ (2005). A National Analysis of Diversity in Science and Engineering Faculties at Research Universities, http://cheminfo.chem.ou.edu/~djn/diversity/briefings/Diversity%20Report%20Final.pdf. Nelson S and G Pellet (1997). Shattering the Silences [videorecording]. San Francisco: Gail Pellet Productions. Nemeth CJ (1995). Dissent as driving cognition, attitudes, and judgments. Social Cognition 13:273-291. Nemeth CJ (1985). Dissent, group process, and creativity: The contribution of minority influence. Advances in Group Processes 2:57-75. Nettles MT and CM Millett (2006). Three Magic Letters: Getting to PhD. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Newcombe NS and J Huttenlocher (2006). Development of spatial cognition. In eds. D Kuhn and RS Siegler, Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, Perception, and Language (6th ed.). New York: Wiley. Newkirk MM, E Richie, and JK Lunney (2005). Advancing women scientists: The immunology experience. Nature Immunology 6(9):855. Niemann YF and JF Dovidio (1998). Relationship of solo status, academic rank, and perceived distinctiveness to job satisfaction of racial/ethic minorities. Journal of Applied Psychology 83(1):55-71. Nieva V and B Gutek (1980). Sex effects on evaluation. Academy of Management Review 5:267-276. Nieves-Squires S (1991). Hispanic Women: Making their Presence on Campus Less Tenuous. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges. Nordenström A, A Servin, G Bohlin, A Larsson, and A Wedell (2002). Sex-typed toy play behavior correlates with the degree of prenatal androgen exposure assessed by CYP 21 genotype in girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 87(11):5119-5124. Nosek, BA, MR Banaji, and AG Greenwald (2002). Math = Male, Me = Female, Therefore Math ≠ Me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83:44-59. Nowell A and LV Hedges (1998). Trends in gender differences in academic achievement from 1960 to 1994: An analysis of differences in mean, variance and extreme scores, Sex Roles: A Journal of Research:21-43. Oakes J (1990). Opportunities, achievement, and choice: Women and minority students in science and mathematics. Review of Research in Education 16:153-222. O’Boyle MW, EJ Hoff, and HS Gill (1995). The influence of mirror reversals on male and female performance in spatial tasks: A componential look. Personality and Individual Differences 18:693-699. Office of Extramural Research (2005). Sex/Gender in the Biomedical Science Workforce. National Institutes of Health, http://grants2.nih.gov/grants/policy/sex_gender/q_a.htm#q5.
OCR for page 293
Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Oldenziel R (2000). Multiple entry visas: Gender and engineering in the US, 1870-1945. In eds. A Canal, R Oldenziel, and K Zachmann, Crossing Boundaries, Building Bridges: Comparing the History of Women Engineers 1870s-1990s, Amsterdam: Overseas Publishers Association. Olsen D, SA Maple, and FK Stage (1995). Women and minority faculty job satisfaction: Professional role interests, professional satisfactions, and institutional fit. The Journal of Higher Education 66(3):267-293. Opinion of the court. Grutter v. Bollinger 539 US 306, 2003, http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/pdf/02-241P.ZO. O’Reilly C, DF Caldwell, and WP Barnett (1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly 34:21-37. Orfield G. (2005) Dropouts in America: Confronting the Graduation Rate Crisis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press. Ostrom TM, SL Carpenter, C Sedikeides, and F Li (1993). Differential processing of in-group and out-group information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64:21-34. Ostrow E (2002). The backlash against academic parents. Chronicle of Higher Education (February 22), http://chronicle.com/jobs/2002/02/2002022202c.htm. Packard Foundation. Packard Fellowships for Science and Engineering 2006 Guidelines. http://www.packard.org/assets/files/conservation%20and%20science/2006_fellows__guidelines.pdf. Paglin M and AM Rufolo (1990). Heterogeneous human capital, occupational choice, and male-female earnings differences. Journal of Labor Economics 8(1):123-144. Palepu A, PL Carr, RH Friedman, H Amos, AS Ash, and MA Moskowitz (1998). Minority faculty in academic medicine. JAMA 280(9):767-771. Palfrey TR and H Rosenthal (1994). Repeated play, cooperation and coordination: An experimental study. Review of Economic Studies 61:545-565. Park B and CM Judd (1990). Measures and models of perceived group variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59:173-191. Park SM (1996). Research, teaching and service: Why shouldn’t women’s work count? Journal of Higher Education 67:46-84. Pasterski VL, ME Geffner, C Brain, P Hindmarsh, B Charles, and M Hines (2005). Prenatal hormones and postnatal socialization by parents as determinants of male-typical toyplay in girls with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Child Development 76:264-278. Pearson W (1985). Black Scientists, White Society, and Colorless Science: A Study of Universalism in American Science. Millwood, NY: Associated Faculty. Pelled LH (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science 7:615-631. Peña M (2006). New childbirth policy for female graduate students. Stanford Report, http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2006/february1/mom-020106.html. Pettigrew TF and J Martin (1987). Shaping the organizational context for Black American inclusion. Journal of Social Issues 43(1):41-78. Pinker S (2005). The science of gender and science. In Pinker and Spelke: A debate. Edge: The Third Culture, http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/debate05/debate05_index.html. Pinker S (2005). The science of difference: Sex ed. The New Republic, February 14. Pinker S (2002). The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature. New York: Viking. Pion G and M Ionescu-Pioggia (2003). Bridging postdoctoral training and a faculty position: Initial outcomes of the Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Awards in the Biomedical Sciences. Academic Medicine 78(2):177-186. Plater WM (1995). Future work: Faculty time in the 21st century. Change 27(3):22-33. Plous S (2003). The psychology of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination: An overview. In ed. S Plous, Understanding Prejudice and Discrimination. New York: McGraw-Hill.
OCR for page 294
Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Polyani M (1962). The Republic of Science: Its political and economic theory. Minerva 1: 54-74. Pratto F and JA Bargh (1991). Stereotyping based on apparently individuating information: Trait and global components of sex stereotypes under attention overload. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 27:26-47. Preston AE (2004). Leaving Science: Occupational Exit from Scientific Careers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Pribbenow C, C Maidl, and J Winchell (2005). WISELI’s Workshops for Search Chairs: Evaluation Report. Madison: University of Wisconsin. Quinn DM and SJ Spencer (2001). The interference of stereotype threat with women’s generation of mathematical problem-solving strategies. Journal of Social Issues 57(1):55-71. Rapoport R, L Bailyn, JK Fletcher, and BH Pruitt (2002). Beyond Work-Family Balance: Advancing Gender Equity and Workplace Performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Rennie DJ (1998) Peer review in Prague. JAMA 280(3):214-215. Reskin B (2000). The proximate causes of employment discrimination. Contemporary Sociology 29(2):319-328. Reskin B and P Roos (1990). Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women’s Inroads into Male Occupations. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press. Resnick SM, SA Berenbaum, II Gottesman, and TJ Bouchard (1986). Early hormonal influences on cognitive functioning in congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Developmental Psychology 22(2):191-198. Rice ER and AE Austin (1988). Faculty morale: What exemplary colleges do right. Change 20(3):51-58. Roach R (2005). Ford diversity fellows urged to defend affirmative action. Diverse Issues in Higher Education, http://www.diverseeducation.com/artman/publish/article_4898.shtml. Rolison DR (2003). Can title IX do for women in science and engineering what it has done for women in sports? American Physical Society News Online 12(5):8. Rosenfeld RA and JA Jones (1987). Patterns and effects of geographic mobility for academic women and men. Journal of Higher Education 58(5):493-515. Rosenthal R, RL Rosnow, and DB Rubin (2000). Contrasts and Effect Sizes in Behavioral Research: A Correlational Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Ross JS, CP Gross, MM Desai, Y Hong, AO Grant, SR Daniels, VC Hachinski, RJ Gibbons, TJ Gardner, and HM Krumholz (2006). Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance. JAMA 295:1675-1680. Rosser S and JL Chameau (2006). Institutionalization, sustainability, and repeatability of ADVANCE for institutional transformation. Journal of Technology Transfer 31: 335-344. Rosser SV (2006). Creating an inclusive work environment. In Biological, Social, and Organizational Components of Success for Women in Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Rosser SV (2004). The Science Glass Ceiling. New York: Routledge. Rosser VJ (2004). Faculty members’ intentions to leave: A national study on their worklife and satisfaction. Research in Higher Education 45(3):285-309. Roth S (2003). The Steering Committee’s Report on the Women’s Initiative. Durham, NC: Duke University, http://www.duke.edu/womens_initiative/exec.htm. Rouse C and C Goldin (2000). Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. American Economics Review 90:715-741. Rudman LA and P Glick (2001). Gender effects on social influence and hireability: Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash towards agentic women. Journal of Social Issues 57(4):743-762.
OCR for page 295
Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Rudman LA and SE Kilianski SE (2000). Implicit and explicit attitudes toward female authority. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26(11):315-1328. Rutgers University (2001). A Study of Gender Equity in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences, http://fas.rutgers.edu/onlineforms/gender_report.pdf. Sandler BR (1991). The Campus Climate Revisited: Chilly Climate for Women Faculty, Administrators, and Graduate Students. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges. Saults SJ, F Liu, and MK Hoard (2000). Sex differences in spatial cognition, computational fluency, and arithmetical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 77: 337-353. Sax LJ, S Hagedorn, M Arredondo, and FA Dicrisi (2002). Faculty research productivity: Exploring the role of gender and family-related factors. Research in Higher Education 43(4):423-446. Schmader T (2002). Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 38:194-201. Schmader T, M Johns, and M Barquissau (2004). The costs of accepting gender differences: The role of stereotype endorsement in women’s experience in the math domain. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 50:835-850. Schmidt P (2006). From “Minority” to “Diversity”. The transformation of formerly raceexclusive programs may be leaving some students out in the cold. Chronicle of Higher Education 52(22):A24. Schmidt P (2006). Southern Illinois U. and Justice Dept. near accord on minority fellowships. Chronicle of Higher Education 52(22):A26. Schneider A (2000). Support for a rare breed: Tenured women scientists. Chronicle of Higher Education, November 10. Schneider B (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology 40:437-453. Sears ALW (2003). Image problems deplete the number of women in academic applicant pools. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 9:169-181. Serbin LA, D Poulin-Dubois, KA Colburne, MG Sen, and JA Y Eichstedt (2001). Gender stereotyping in infancy: Visual preferences for and knowledge of gender stereotyped toys in the second year. International Journal of Behavioral Development 25:7-15. Seymour E and NM Hewitt (1997). Talking About Leaving. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Sharpe NR and CH Fuller (1995). Baccalaureate origins of women physical science doctorates: Relationship to institutional gender and science discipline. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 2(1):1-15. Shauman KA and Y Xie (1996). Geographic mobility of scientists: Sex differences and family constraints. Demography 33(4):455-468. Shaywitz BA, SE Shaywitz, KR Pugh, RT Constable, P Skudlarski, RK Fulbright, RA Bronen, JM Fletcher, DP Shankweler, L Katz, and JC Gore (1995). Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language. Nature 373:607-609. Shepard RN and J Metzler (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science 171(972):701-703. Sheridan J, PF Brennan, M Carnes, and J Handelsman (2006). Discovering directions for change in higher education through the experiences of senior women faculty. Journal of Technology Transfer 31:387-396. Shih M, TL Pittinsky, and N Ambady (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science 10(1):80-83. Simpson R and C Cohen (2004). Dangerous work: The gendered nature of bullying in the context of higher education. Gender, Work and Organization 11(2):163-186.
OCR for page 296
Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Sinclair L and Z Kunda (2000). Motivated stereotyping of women: She’s fine if she praised me but incompetent if she criticized me. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26(11):1329-1342. Singer JM and JE Stake (1986). Mathematics and self-esteem: Implications for women’s career choice. Psychology of Women Quarterly 10:339-352. Skolnik M (2000). Does counting publications provide any useful information about academic performance? Teacher Education Quarterly 27(2):15-25. Smith DG, S Parker, AR Clayton-Pedersen, JF Moreno, and DH Teraguchi (2006). Building Capacity: The Study of Impact of The James Irvine Foundation Campus Diversity Initiative. Irvine, CA: The James Irvine Foundation. Solomon BM (1985). In the Company of Educated Women: A History of Women and Higher Education in America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Solorzano DG (1994). The baccalaureate origins of Chicana and Chicano doctorates in the physical, life, and engineering sciences: 1980-1990. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 1(4):253-272. Sommer IEC, A Aleman, A Bouma, and RS Kahn (2004). Do women really have more bilateral language representation than men? A meta-analysis of functional imaging studies. Brain 127(8):1845-1852. Sonnert G and G Holton (1996). Career patterns of women and men in the sciences. American Scientist 84:63-71. South SJ, CM Bonjean, WT Markham, and J Corder (1982). Social structure and intergroup interaction: Men and women of the federal bureaucracy. American Sociological Review 47:587-599. Spelke ES (2005). Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science? A critical review. American Psychologist 60(9):950-958. Spencer SJ, CM Steele, and DM Quinn (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology 35:4-28. Stacy A (2006). Recruitment practices. In Biological, Social, and Organizational Components of Success for Women in Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Stanford University Chemistry Department. Letter to Graduate Students, http://pubs.acs.org/cen/news/pdf/Stanford_Policy.pdf?sessid=1602. Stanford University. Stanford Graduate Student Handbook. “Childbirth Policy for Women Graduate Students at Stanford University,” http://www.stanford.edu/dept/DoR/GSH/childbirth.html. Steele CM (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist 52:613-629. Steele CM and J Aronson (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69:797-811. Steinpreis R, K Sanders, and D Ritzke (1999). The impact of gender on the review of the curriculum vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national empirical study. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 41:509-528. Stewart AJ, D LaVaque-Manty, and JE Malley (2004). Recruiting women faculty in science and engineering: Preliminary evaluation of one intervention model. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 10(4):361-375. Strangor C, L Lynch, C Duan, and B Glass (1992). Categorization of individuals on the basis of multiple social features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62:207-218. Strum S (2001). Second generation employment discrimination: A structural approach. Columbia Law Review 101(3):458-568.
OCR for page 297
Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Sullivan B, C Hollenshead, and G Smith (2004). Developing and implementing work-family policies for faculty. Academe 90(6), http://www.aaup.org/publications/ Academe/2004/04nd/04ndsull.htm. Taylor SE and ST Fiske (1976). The token in the small group: Research findings and research implications. In ed. J Sweeney, Psychology and Politics: Collected Papers. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Tetlock PE (1985). Accountability: A social check on the fundamental attribution error. Social Psychology Quarterly 48:227-236. Tenenbaum HR and C Leaper (2003a). Are parents’ gender schemas related to their children’s gender-related cognitions? A meta-analysis. Developmental Psychology 38(4):615-630. Tenenbaum HR and C Leaper (2003b). Parent-child conversations about science: The socialization of gender inequities. Developmental Psychology 39(1):34-47. Teodorescu D (2002). Faculty Gender Equity at Emory: PCSW Study Finds Both Fairness and Imbalances, http://www.emory.edu/ACAD_EXCHANGE/2002/octnov/pcsw.html. Thomas DA (2004). Diversity as strategy. Harvard Business Review 82(9):98-108. Thornton S (2003). Maternity and childrearing leave policies for faculty: The legal and practical challenges of complying with Title VII. University of Southern California Review of Law and Women’s Studies 12(2):161-190. Tomasello M and J Call (1997). Primate Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press. Tomaskoviv-Devey D, M Thomas, and K Johnson (2005). Race and the accumulation of human capital across the career: A theoretical model of fixed-effects application. American Journal of Sociology 111:58-89. Toren N and V Kraus (1987). The effects of minority size on women’s position in academia. Social Forces 65:1090-1100. Tregenza T (2002). Gender bias in the refereeing process? TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution 17(8):349-350. Trix F and C Psenka (2003). Exploring the color of glass: Letters of recommendation for female and male medical faculty. Discourse and Society 14(2):191-220. Trower C and R Chait (2002). Faculty diversity: Too little for too long. Harvard Magazine (March-April). Trower CA and JL Bleak (2004). Study of New Scholars. Gender: Statistical Report [Universities]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education, http://www.gse.harvard.edu/~newscholars/newscholars/downloads/genderreport.pdf. Turner CSV (2002). Women of color in academe: Living with multiple marginality. The Journal of Higher Education 73(1):74-93. Turner CSV (2000). New faces, new knowledge. Academe 86:34-37. Turner CSV and SL Myers (2000). Faculty of Color in Academe: Bittersweet Success. New York: Allyn and Bacon. Tyre P (2006). The trouble with boys. Newsweek 147(5):44-52 (Jan 30). Umbach PD (2006). Gender Equity in the Academic Labor Market: An Analysis of Academic Disciplines. Paper presented at the 2006 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA, April 7-11, http://myweb.uiowa.edu/pumbach/AERA2006_equitypaper.pdf. University of California-Davis Lab Management Institute Web page, http://www.research.ucdavis.edu/home.cfm?id=OVC,14,1488. University of California-Santa Cruz Chancellor’s Inaugural Symposium, November 3, 2006, http://celebration2005.ucsc.edu/symposium.asp. University of Colorado at Boulder (2001). Faculty Recruitment and Retention Task Force Report, http://www.colorado.edu/AcademicAffairs/fac_recruit/fac_recruit.doc. University of Michigan STRIDE Web Page, http://sitemaker.umich.edu/advance/stride.
OCR for page 298
Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering University of Washington ADVANCE Web Page, http://www.engr.washington.edu/advance/workshops/index.html. University of Washington (2003). ADVANCE Center for Institutional Change Faculty Retention Toolkit, http://www.engr.washington.edu/advance/resources/Retention/index.html. University of Washington. Childcare Voucher Program, http://depts.washington.edu/ovpsa/childcare/voucher.html. US Department of Education (2004). International Outcomes of Learning in Mathematics Literacy and Problem Solving: PISA 2003 Results From the US Perspective: Highlights (NCES 2005−003). Washington, DC: US Department of Education. Valian V (1998). Why So Slow? The Advancement of Women. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. van Marle K (2004). Infants’ Understanding of Number: The Relationship Between Discrete and Continuous Quantity. Doctoral dissertation, Yale University. van Rooyen S, F Godlee, S Evans, R Smith, and N Black (1998). Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: A randomized trial. JAMA 280(3):234-237. Vistnes JP (1997). Gender differences in days lost from work due to illness. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 50(2):304-323. Vogt C (2006). Women’s participation in ICT careers in industrialized nations. In eds. J Eccles and H Watt, Explaining Gendered Occupational Outcomes. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Voyer D, S Voyer, and MP Bryden (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin 117(2): 250-270. Waldfogel, J, Y Higuchi, and M Abe (1999). Family leave policies and women’s retention after childbirth: Evidence from the United States, Britain, and Japan. Journal of Population Economics 12:523-545. Ward K and L Wolf-Wendel (2004). Fear factor: How safe is it to make time for family? Academe 90(6), http://www.aaup.org/publications/Academe/2004/04nd/04ndward.htm. Weinberger CJ (2005). Is the Science and Engineering Workforce Drawn from the Far Upper Tail of the Math Ability Distribution? (Working Paper). Institute for Social, Behavioral and Economic Research and Department of Economics, University of California at Santa Barbara. Weiss EM, G Kemmler, EA Deisenhammer, W Fleischhacker, and M Delazer (2003). Sex differences in cognitive functions. Personality and Individual Differences 35(4):863-875. Wennerås C and A Wold (1997). Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature 387:341-343. Wenzel SA and C Hollenshead (1998). Former Women Faculty: Reasons for Leaving One Research University. (ED 465 327). Washington, DC: ERIC Document Service. Williams J (2005). Are your parental leave policies legal? The Chronicle of Higher Education, http://chronicle.com/jobs/2005/02/2005020701c.htm. Williams JC (2006). Long time no see: Why are there still so few women in academic science and engineering. In Biological, Social, and Organizational Components of Success for Women in Academic Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Williams JC (2006). Moving beyond the “Chilly Climate” to a new model for spurring organizational change. In Biological, Social, and Organizational Components of Success for Women in Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Williams JC (2004). Hitting the maternal wall. Academe 12(6), http://www.aaup.org/publications/Academe/2004/04nd/04ndwill.htm. Williams JC and HC Cooper (2004). The public policy of motherhood. Journal of Social Issues 60(4):849-865. Williams JC (2000). Unbending Gender: Why Work and Family Conflict and What to Do About It. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
OCR for page 299
Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering Wilson G, I Sakura-Lemessy, and JP West (1999). Reaching for the top: Racial differences in mobility paths to upper-tier occupations. Work and Occupations 26:165-186. Wilson R (2006). Dartmouth to provide paid leave to graduate students with new children. The Chronicle of Higher Education (May 16), http://chronicle.com/cgi-bin/printable.cgi?article=http://chronicle.com/daily/2006/05/2006051904n.htm. Wilson R (2003). Duke and Princeton will spend more to make female professors happy. The Chronicle of Higher Education (October 10). Witelson SF (1991). Neural sexual mosaicism: Sexual differentiation of the human temporoparietal region for function asymmetry. Psychoneuroendocrinology 16(1-3):131-153. Witelson SF, II Glezer, and DL Kigaar (1995). Women have greater density of neurons in the posterior temporal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience 15(5):3418-3428. Wolf-Wendel LE, SB Twombly and S Rice (2003) The Two-body Problem: Dual-Career Couple Hiring Practices in Higher Education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Wolf-Wendel LE, SB Twombly, and S Rice (2000). Dual-career couples: Keeping them together. Journal of Higher Education 71(3):291-321. Women in Science and Engineering Leadership Institute. Advice to the Top: Top 10 Tips for Academic Leaders to Accelerate the Advancement of Women in Science and Engineering. University of Wisconsin: WISELI, http://wiseli.engr.wisc.edu/Products/Sex_and_Science.pdf. Women in Science and Engineering Leadership Institute. Training for hiring committees. University of Wisconsin: WISELI, http://wiseli.engr.wisc.edu/initiatives/hiring/training_hiring.html#Workshops. Xie Y (1996). A demographic approach to studying the process of becoming a scientist/ engineer. In Careers in Science and Technology: An International Perspective. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Xie Y and KA Shaumann (2003). Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Xie Y and KA Shauman (1998). Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. American Sociological Review 63(6):847-870. Yoder J (1991). Rethinking tokenism: Looking beyond numbers. Gender and Society 5(2): 178-192. Young R and H Sweeting (2004). Adolescent bullying, relationships, psychological wellbeing, and gender-atypical behavior: A gender diagnosticity approach. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 50(7/8):525-537. Zare R (2006). Sex, lies, and Title IX. Chemical and Engineering News 84(2):46-49, http://pubs.acs.org/cen/education/84/8420education.html. Zhang L (2004). Crowd Out or Opt Out: The Changing Landscape of Doctorate Production in American Universities (Working Paper 63). Ithaca, NY: Cornell Higher Education Research Institute, http://www.ilr.cornell.edu/cheri/wp/cheri_wp63.pdf. Zhou Y and JF Volkwein (2004). Examining the influences on faculty departure intentions: A comparison of tenured versus nontenured faculty at research universities using NSOPF-99. Research in Higher Education 45(2):139-176. Zimmer L (1998). Tokenism and women in the workplace: The limits of gender-neutral theory. Social Problems 35(1):64-77.
OCR for page 300
Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering This page intentionally left blank.
Representative terms from entire chapter: