National Academies Press: OpenBook

Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks (2007)

Chapter: Appendix B Data Tables

« Previous: Appendix A Glossary and Supplementary Information
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

B
Data Tables

Note: Abbreviations/acronyms included in the following data tables are included in the Glossary (see Appendix A).

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Studies on Women, Infants, and Children

TABLE B-1a Studies on Preeclampsia: Effects on Women Who Increase Seafood and/or Omega-3 Fatty Acid Intake

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Sibai, 1998

Review

3 randomized controlled trials

Fish-oil supplement

 

Sindelar et al., 2004

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men (n=8)

Women (n=4)

Mean age of 33 years

Lincoln, NE

Non-Hispanic White

Recruited at YMCA marathon and triathlon training group meetings and word of mouth

Exercising regularly as members of a running training group sponsored by the local YMCA

No being treated with eating disorders or depression, or those unable to eat eggs, or those using medications known to affect serum lipids

n-3 PUFA-enriched eggs

2 weeks baseline period, 4 weeks treatment period (crossover design), 4 weeks washout period between treatments

Haugen and Helland, 2001

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=37)

Mean age about 27-31 years

Oslo, Norway

Normotensive without proteinuria, had uncomplicated term pregnancies, randomly taken from another study investigating the influence of omega-3 fatty acids on fetal, neonatal, and child development

Another group had moderate preeclampsia

Cod-liver oil supplement

16-20 weeks gestation through pregnancy

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

 

“The beneficial effects of fish oil on the incidence of preeclampsia are supported by observational studies and 1 large, uncontrolled early trial.”

Three randomized trials “reveal no reduction in the incidence of preeclampsia in the fish oil group.”

N

n-3 PUFA-enriched eggs:

flaxseed added to hens’ diet

350 mg n-3 PUFA/60 g egg

0.25 g LA, 0.10 g DHA/60 g egg

1 egg/day for 6 days and no eggs on day 7

Conventional eggs:

60 mg of n-3 PUFA/60 g egg

0.04 g LA, 0.02 g DHA/60 g egg

1 egg/day for 6 days and no eggs on day 7

LA, DHA, and total n-3 dietary intake of those randomized to n-3 PUFA-enriched egg treatment were significantly higher than at baseline and compared to the conventional egg treatment (p<0.05).

There were no significant differences in serum total cholesterol, LDL-C and HDL-C in physically active adults from baseline to end of treatment or between groups.

Serum triglycerides were significantly higher with n-3 PUFA-enriched egg treatment than those from baseline and compared to the conventional egg treatment (p<0.05).

N/A

Cod-liver oil group:

10 mL/day

Corn oil group:

10 mL/day

“The pressure increase was significant in both groups, but no significant differences in the constrictory response or in the proportions of preparations displaying dilatatory responses were observed when compared to appropriate control groups.”

“Neither preeclampsia nor dietary supplementation with cod-liver oil had any significant effect on the vasoactive response to PGF2α in umbilical cord arteries.”

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Salvig et al., 1996

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=533)

Aged 18-44 years

Aarhus, Denmark

No history of placental abruption in an earlier pregnancy or a serious bleeding episode in the present pregnancy, no prostaglandin inhibitors regularly, no allergy to fish and regular intake of fish oil

Fish-oil supplement

30th week gestation through pregnancy

Onwude et al., 1995

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=233)

Aged 18-39 years for fish oil group

Aged 16-40 for placebo group

Leeds, UK

Multigravida with a history of one or more small babies, a history of proteinuric or nonproteinuric pregnancy-induced hypertension, or a history of unexplained stillbirth

Primigravida with abnormal uterine arcuate artery Doppler blood flow at 24 weeks gestation

EPA/DHA supplement

Until 38th week gestation; enrollment time unspecified

Bulstra-Ramakers, 1995

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=63)

Groningen, Netherlands

Birth weight below the 10th percentile in association with pregnancy-induced hypertension or chronic renal disease, or with placenta abnormalities

EPA supplement

12-14 weeks gestation until delivery

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Fish oil group:

2.7 g/day

(4 capsules/day, each capsule contains 32% EPA, 23% DHA, 2 mg tocopherol/ml)

Olive oil group:

1 g; 72% oleic acid and 12% LA/capsule

4 capsules/day

Control = no capsule

“Mean blood pressure increased during the course of the 3rd trimester,” but this change was not statistically different among the three groups.

“No differences were seen between the groups in proportions of women with a systolic blood pressure above 140 mmHg or a systolic blood pressure above 90 mmHg, although the proportion of women with diastolic above 90 mmHg tended to be lower in the fish oil group compared to the olive oil group (RR=0.48, p=0.07).”

N

2.7 g/day

(1.62 g/day of EPA)

(1.08 g/day of DHA)

There were no significant differences between the two groups for proteinuric pregnancy-induced hypertension, nonproteinuric pregnancy-induced hypertension, birth weight, gestation length, perinatal death, duration of labor, onset of labor (spontaneous, induced, or prelabor section), or mode of delivery.

N

4 capsules 3 times/day

(each capsule contains 0.25 mg EPA ) vs. placebo

“Addition of 3 g/day of EPA to the diet did not result in either a lowering of the incidence of pregnancy induced hypertension or intrauterine growth retardation.”

“Birth weight centiles were slightly lower and the recurrence rate of pregnancy-induced hypertension was slightly higher in the EPA group,” compared to the control group, although these differences were not significant.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Schiff et al., 1993

Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=16)

Aged 25-34 years

Nulliparous

Nonsmokers, no history of hypertension, coagulation disorders, thrombocytopenia, or chronic vascular, renal, or other disease

Fish-oil supplement

32-34 weeks through the next 21 days

Olsen and Secher, 1990

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=5022)

Aged 15-44 years

London

People’s League of Health, 1946

Attending antenatal clinics of 10 hospitals

No disease or physical abnormality

EPA/DHA supplement

Enrolled at <24 weeks gestation; treatment lasts for <15 weeks (n=288), 16-19 weeks (n=411), 20-23 weeks (n=414), or 24+ weeks (n=417)

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

6 capsules/day

(each capsule contains 1000 mg of concentrated fish oil, 26% of which is n-3 fatty acids)

“Mean excretion of 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2 before and after 21 days of fish oil consumption was reduced among the fish oil-treated women from 1606±411 pg/mg of creatinine to 779±299 pg/mg after treatment (p<0.0001, paired t test). In all 11 patients the decreased excretion of this metabolite was considerable, ranging from 32% to 71%.”

No significant change was detected among the control women.

B

0.1 g/day of EPA+DHA from halibut oil in supplement vs. no supplement

Supplement includes 0.26 g ferrous iron; 0.26 g calcium; minute quantities of iodine, manganese and copper; 0.60 g thiamin/g; 0.10 g vitamin C; 0.36 g halibut liver oil

In primiparae, the OR for preeclampsia was significant when comparing the treatment to the control group (OR=0.689, 95% CI 0.50-0.95).

In primiparae, the OR for albuminuria was statistically significant when comparing the treatment to the control group (OR=0.717, 95% CI 0.54-0.96).

In primiparae, the OR for hypertension was not significant when comparing the treatment to the control group (OR=0.862, 95% CI 0.73-1.02).

In multiparae, these statistics were OR=0.677 (95% CI 0.43-1.07), OR=0.675 (95% CI 0.44-1.04), and OR=1.121 (95% CI 0.89-1.42).

There were no significant effects on the occurrences of stillbirths, early neonatal deaths (before 8 days), perinatal deaths, sepsis, or the duration of labor.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Clausen et al., 2001

Cohort

Pregnant women (n=3133)

Mean age 29.8 years

51.8% nulliparous

Representing all socioeconomic classes

Aker University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

No pregestational diabetes or twin/triplet pregnancies

Fatty acids from food

17-19 weeks gestation until after delivery

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Tertiles of saturated fatty acids (%energy) Mean = ≤12.0, 12.0-15.0, >15.0

Tertiles of monounsaturated fatty acids (%energy) Mean = ≤10.5, 10.5-13.0, >13.0

Tertiles of polyunsaturated fatty acids (%energy) Mean = ≤5.2, 5.2-7.5, >7.5

Tertiles of omega-3 fatty acids (%energy) Mean = ≤0.9, 0.9-1.6, >1.6

Tertiles of omega-6 fatty acids (%energy)

Mean = ≤3.8, 3.8-5.8, >5.8

After adjusting for energy, age, smoking, BMI, systolic blood pressure for 20 weeks’ gestation, nullipara and energy:

Statistically significant ORs for preeclampsia, comparing the highest group to the lowest group of fatty acid intakes, were observed for polyunsaturated fatty acids (p=0.01) and omega-6 fatty acids (p=0.05); and

Statistically nonsignificant ORs for preeclampsia, comparing the highest group to the lowest group of fatty acid intakes, were observed for saturated fat (p=0.10), monounsaturated fat (p=0.59), and omega-3 fatty acids (p=0.06).

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Velzing-Aarts et al., 1999

Case-control

Cases (n=27) = preeclamptic women

Controls (n=24) = normotensive, nonproteinuric women

Pregnant women

Mean age about 27 years

Curacao

Fatty acid composition in maternal and umbilical platelets and umbilical arteries and veins

During delivery or within 2 hours after birth

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Mean fatty acid composition in maternal platelets (in mol%):

Controls = 9.66±2.75 LA; 0.27±0.10 ALA; 0.29±0.14 EPA; 2.03±0.62 DHA

Cases = 7.0±21.91 LA; 0.22±0.11 ALA; 0.21±0.07 EPA; 2.16±0.93 DHA

Mean fatty acid composition in umbilical cord platelets (in mol%):

Controls = 3.73±0.76 LA; 0.14±0.10 ALA; 0.16±0.07 EPA; 2.33±0.58 DHA

Cases = 4.16±1.51 LA; 0.21±0.11 ALA; 0.17±0.07 EPA; 1.97±0.30 DHA

Mean fatty acid composition in umbilical veins (in mol%):

Controls = 2.69±0.44 LA; 0.10±0.05 ALA; 0.09±0.04 EPA; 4.26±0.85 DHA

Cases = 2.89±0.56 LA; 0.11±0.05 ALA; 0.07±0.02 EPA; 3.35±0.96 DHA

Mean fatty acid composition in umbilical arteries (in mol%):

Controls = 1.87±0.39 LA; 0.10±0.04 ALA; 0.09±0.03 EPA; 4.83±0.76 DHA

Cases = 1.74±0.75 LA; 0.10±0.06 ALA; 0.06±0.03 EPA; 3.73±1.03 DHA

“Newborns of preeclamptic women had significantly lower birth weights and gestational ages at delivery,” compared to newborns of non-preeclamptic women.

Preeclamptic women had significantly lower maternal platelet levels of LA (p<0.001) and EPA (p<0.05) compared to normotensive women.

Preeclamptic women had significantly lower umbilical arteries levels of EPA (p<0.01) and DHA (p<0.001) compared to normotensive women.

No other significant differences were found for LA, ALA, EPA, or DHA.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Kesmodel et al., 1997

Nested case-control

Cases = women with preeclampsia (n=43), pregnancy-induced hypertension (n=179), intrauterine growth retardation (n=182), delivering preterm (n=153), delivering postterm (n=189)

Control = sample from whole cohort (n=256)

Pregnant women

Aarhus, Denmark

Seafood and fish-oil supplement

Between 6 months and 3 1/2 years after delivery

Williams et al., 1995

Case-control

Cases (n=22) = preeclamptic

Controls (n=40) = normotensive

Pregnant women

Mean age 28.6-31.2 years

White (n=17 in preeclamptic group, n=23 in non-preeclamptic group)

Seattle, Washington

About 21% Medicaid recipient

Maternal erythrocytes fatty acid profiles

Day after delivery

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Low intake = Maximum of 1 fish snack/week and 1 fish meal/month and no fish oil

High intake = Minimum of 4 fish snacks/week or 4 fish meals/month or intake of fish oil during pregnancy

Middle intake = Everyone else

After adjusting for maternal smoking habits, maternal height, maternal weight before pregnancy, parity, maternal social status, and average daily calcium intake:

There were no significant ORs of pregnancy-induced hypertension, preeclampsia, intrauterine growth retardation, preterm delivery or postterm delivery for the middle-intake group or the high-intake group compared to the low-intake group.

N

Tertiles of EPA:

Median = 0.20, 0.26, 0.36

Tertiles of DPA:

Median = 1.54, 1.75, 2.02

Tertiles of DHA:

Median = 4.38, 5.14, 6.40

Tertiles of total long-chain n-3 fatty acids:

Median = 6.23, 7.09, 8.50

After adjusting for parity and pre-pregnancy BMI, the OR of preeclampsia for the lowest tertile of EPA, compared to the highest tertile of EPA was 5.54 (95% CI 1.06-28.79).

After adjusting for parity and pre-pregnancy BMI, the OR of preeclampsia for the lowest tertile of DPA, compared to the highest tertile of DPA was 3.33 (95% CI 0.65-16.99).

After adjusting for parity and pre-pregnancy BMI, the OR of preeclampsia for the lowest tertile of DHA, compared to the highest tertile of DHA was 7.54 (95% CI 1.23-46.22).

After adjusting for parity and pre-pregnancy BMI, the OR of preeclampsia for the lowest tertile of the sum of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids, compared to the highest tertile of long-chain omega-3 fatty acids was 7.63 (95% CI 1.43-40.63).

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Wang et al., 1991

Case-control

Cases (n=9) = preeclamptic women

ControlsA (n=11) = normal pregnant women

ControlsB (n=10) = nonpregnant women

Aged 20-40 years

Term (pregnant women)

Not on oral contraceptives (nonpregnant women)

Plasma fatty acid analysis

During pregnancy

*N = Evidence of no association or no clear association; B = Evidence of a benefit; N/A = A conclusion is not available; these data are presented for background information only.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Nonpregnant women (mg/L±SE):

79.51±3.47 total PUFA, 60.79±2.28 LA, 10.99±1.01 AA, 1.88±0.17 ALA, 0.26±0.04 EPA, 5.58±0.60 DHA

Normal pregnant women (mg/L±SE):

90.60±6.68 total PUFA, 62.93±4.69 LA, 12.81±0.87 AA, 3.68±0.99 ALA, 1.08±0.33 EPA, 10.40±0.94 DHA

Preeclamptic women (mg/L±SE):

67.42±3.88 total PUFA, 45.98±2.80 LA, 11.44±1.00 AA, 1.11±0.25±ALA, 0.11±0.11 EPA, 8.94±0.69 DHA

Plasma total polyunsaturated fatty acid levels, LA, ALA, and EPA were all significantly higher in the normal pregnant women than in the preeclamptic women (p<0.05, p<0.01, p<0.05, p<0.05, respectively).

EPA and DHA were significantly lower in the nonpregnant women compared to the pregnant women (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively).

No other significant differences between the plasma polyunsaturated fatty acid levels in the three groups were found.

“No statistical differences were noted in the five polyunsaturated fatty acid levels between fasting and non-fasting states in both non-pregnant and normal pregnant subjects.”

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

TABLE B-1b Studies on Postpartum Depression: Effects on Women Who Increase Seafood and/or Omega-3 Fatty Acid Intake

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Marangell et al., 2004

Open trial

Pregnant women (n=7)

Aged 31-42 years

Married, Caucasian (except for one married, Hispanic)

Baylor College of Medicine

History of a depressive episode in the postpartum period, not suffering from a current depressive episode

No psychotropic medications within 2 weeks of baseline, history of nonreponse to two or more antidepressants, serious comorbid medical or psychiatric illness, or significant risk of dangerousness to self or others

Fish-oil supplement

34-36 weeks gestation until 12 weeks postpartum

Llorente et al., 2003

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=89)

Aged 18-42 years

No chronic medical condition, no dietary supplements other than vitamins, no smoking, who had not been pregnant >5 times

Planned to breastfeed infants exclusively for at least 4 months

Part of a larger cohort study on effects of DHA on breastfeeding mothers and their infants

Algae-derived triglyceride supplement

Within a week of delivery to 4 months after delivery

Hibbeln and Salem, 1995

Review

Summary of three cohorts

DHA depletion

 

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Fish oil group:

2960 mg fish oil/day

173 mg EPA and 123 mg DHA per day

10 capsules/day

Trial was terminated because of a high relapse rate observed after enrolling only seven participants.

N

Algae-derived triglyceride capsule (about 200 mg DHA/day) vs. placebo

“Repeated measures analysis of variance, with the use of data only from the women who completed the questionnaires at both baseline and 4 months, showed no difference between the two groups at any time” with regards to postpartum depression.

“There were no significant differences between groups in the EPDS and SCID-CV scores, particularly in current or past episodes of depression, as detected by the SCID-CV.”

“There were no significant correlations between plasma phospholipid DHA content and BDI, EPDS, or SCID-CV scores.”

N

 

“The relative maternal depletion of DHA may be one of the complex factors leading to increased risk of depression in women of childbearing age and in postpartum periods.”

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Timonen et al., 2004

Cohort

Live female births (n=2968)

Live male births (n=2721)

Unselected, genetically homogeneous

Northern Finland 1966 Birth Cohort

Seafood

Previous 6 months (during pregnancy) until 31 years of age

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Rare eaters: ≤1 time/month

Regular eaters: ≥1 time/week

Serving size unspecified

After adjusting for body mass index, serum total cholesterol level, and socioeconomic situation, women who ate fish rarely had a higher OR for depression, compared to women who ate fish regularly. This statistic was observed by various measurements:

Doctor-diagnosis:

OR=1.3 (95% CI 0.9-1.9);

HSCL-25 <2.01:

OR=1.4 (95% CI 1.1-1.9);

HSCL-25 <2.01 and doctor-diagnosis:

OR=2.6 (95% CI 1.4-5.1).

After adjusting for alcohol intake, smoking, physical inactivity, and marital status, women who ate fish rarely had a higher OR for depression, compared to women who ate fish regularly. This statistic was observed by various measurements:

Doctor-diagnosis:

OR=1.2 (95% CI 0.9-1.6);

HSCL-25 <2.01:

OR=1.4 (95% CI 1.1-1.8);

HSCL-25 <2.01 and doctor-diagnosis:

OR=2.4 (95% CI 1.4-4.2).

Among men, none of these ORs were significant.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Otto et al., 2003

Cohort

Participated in 2 earlier studies

Pregnant women (n=112)

Mean age around 30 years

Caucasian

Southern Limburg, Netherlands

Fish intake <2 times/week

No metabolic, cardiovascular, neurologic, renal, or psychiatric disorders

No medications, except for multivitamins and iron supplements

Singleton pregnancy

Term delivery

No blood transfusions in the perinatal period

Gestational age <14 weeks at entry, Caucasian, fish consumption <2 times a week (for Study 2 only)

Venous (plasma) blood fatty acid composition

36 weeks gestation, at delivery, and 32 weeks postpartum

Otto et al., 2001

Cohort

Pregnant women (n=57)

Mean age around 30 years

Southern Limburg, Netherlands

No metabolic, cardiovascular, neurologic, or renal disorders

No medications, except multivitamins and iron supplements

Singleton pregnancy

Term delivery

No blood transfusions in the perinatal period

Diet and venous blood fatty acid profiles

36-37 weeks gestation; 2-5 days after delivery; 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 weeks postpartum

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Absolute amount not specified

No significant relationship was observed between DHA, n-6DPA, or their ratio and the EPDS scores at delivery or at 32 weeks postpartum.

No statistically significant relationships between depression and fatty acid status were observed with DHA or n-6DPA, neither for the levels at delivery, nor for their postpartum changes.

“The improvement of the DHA status during the postpartum period, as reflected by the increase of the DHA/n-6DPA ratio during this period, was higher in the non-depressed than in the depressed women (OR=0.90, p=0.04).”

Similar results remained after adjusting for Study 1 or 2, parity, education level, maternal age at test moment, breastfeeding, smoking, and alcohol use (OR=0.88, p=0.03).

N

Absolute amount not specified

“After delivery, total fatty acids in plasma phospholipids decreased significantly over time in the lactating and nonlactating women (p<0.0001).”

“The amounts of ALA, DHA, and total n-3 fatty acids showed significant downward trends postpartum in both groups, whereas the amounts of EPA and DPA increased significantly after delivery.”

N/A

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Al et al., 1995

Cohort

Pregnant women (n=110)

Aged 19-43 years

Maastricht, Netherlands

Caucasian

Singleton pregnancy

DBP <90 mmHg

No metabolic, cardiovascular, neurological or renal disorder

Maternal venous and umbilical vein fatty acid profiles

10, 14, 18, 22, 26, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40 weeks gestation; after delivery; 6 months after delivery

Holman, 1991

Cohort

Pregnant women (n=19)

Aged 24-36 years

Caucasian

Normotensive, normal singleton pregnancies

Mayo Clinic, Minnesota

Controls (n=59) = staff and students from the University of Minnesota, aged 19-48 years

Blood fatty acid composition

36 weeks gestation, during labor, 6 weeks postpartum

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Absolute amount not specified

“The average total amount of fatty acid (TF) in maternal venous plasma PL increased significantly (p<0.0001) during pregnancy, but the rise in TF became less pronounced towards the end of gestation (p<0.0001).”

“Total fatty acids increased from 1238.11 mg/L at week 10 to 1867.84 mg/L at week 40 of gestation, and all of the fatty acid families showed a similar course.”

“The mean amount of total fatty acids in umbilical plasma phospholipids was substantially lower (p<0.0001) than all maternal values” for all fatty acid families.

“In contrast to the absolute amounts of AA and DHA, the mean relative amounts of AA and DHA in umbilical plasma phospholipids were significantly (p<0.0001) higher than all maternal values.”

N/A

Normal controls of nonpregnant women of childbearing age

All in mol%±SEM: 24.1±0.39 LA, 12.5±0.24 AA, 0.22±0.01 ALA, 0.53±0.03 EPA, 1.04±0.04 DPA, 3.71±0.14 DHA

All individual PUFA were less than normal in pregnant women at 36 weeks of pregnancy than in the nonpregnant women, where EPA was 42% of normal values.

“The fatty acid profile of plasma phospholipids during labor was similar to that at 36 weeks except for the subnormal LA and ALA values became significant at p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively, and the elevated 22:5n-6 became significant at 0.001.”

The fatty acid profile of plasma phospholipids for lactating women 6 weeks postpartum was similar to those during pregnancy and labor except that AA status improved, diminished ALA, and increased EPA and DPA toward normal.

The fatty acid profile of plasma phospholipids for nonlactating women 6 weeks postpartum was similar to that of the lactating women, expect that abnormalities were less severe or of lower significance.

N/A

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Hibbeln, 2002

Cross-sectional

Pregnancy women (n=14,532)

23 countries

41 different studies

Seafood

During pregnancy, unspecified

*N = Evidence of no association or no clear association; B = Evidence of a benefit; N/A = A conclusion is not available; these data are presented for background information only.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Absolute amount not specified

“Greater apparent seafood consumption predicted DHA content of mothers’ milk (p<0.006)” and “higher DHA content in mothers’ milk predicted a lower prevalence rate of postpartum depression (p<0.0001).”

“Higher national seafood consumption predicted lower prevalence rates of postpartum depression (p<0.0001).”

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

TABLE B-1c Studies on Gestation and Birth Weight: Effects on Infants of Mothers Who Increase Seafood and/or Omega-3 Fatty Acid Intake

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

de Groot et al., 2004

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=79)

Mean age of 29-30 years

Maternal education about 4 (on an 8-point scale)

Maastricht, Heerlen, Sittard, southeastern Netherlands

White origin, gestational age <14 weeks, normal health, fish consumption <2 times/week

No hypertensive, metabolic, cardiovascular, renal, psychiatric, or neurologic disorder

ALA-supplemented margarine

14 weeks gestation until delivery

Smuts et al., 2003a

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=73)

Mainly African-American

Aged 16-35 years

Reachable by telephone

Planned to deliver at the Regional Medical Center in Memphis, TN

No more than four pregnancies

DHA-enriched egg

24-28 weeks gestation until delivery

Smuts et al., 2003b

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=291)

Aged 16-36 years

Mainly African-descent

Plan to deliver at Truman Medical Center in Kansas City, MO

Able and willing to consume eggs, access to refrigeration

Singleton gestation

No weight >240 pounds at baseline, cancer, lupus, hepatitis, infectious disease, diabetes, gestational diabetes, elevated blood pressure at baseline

DHA-enriched egg

24-28 weeks gestation until delivery

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Experimental group (% total fatty acids):

ALA-enriched high-LA margarine

25 g margarine

45.36 LA, 14.18 ALA

Control group (% total fatty acids):

No ALA high-LA margarine

25 g margarine/day

55.02 LA, 0.17 ALA

Newborns in the experimental group had a significantly higher mean birth weight than those in the control group (p=0.043).

No significant differences in gestational age, APGAR score, or umbilical plasma DHA concentrations in phospholipids were found between the two groups.

B (birth weight only)

High-DHA egg group:

mean = 183.9±71.4 mg DHA/day

ranged from 27.6 to 264.9 mg/day

Ordinary egg group:

mean = 35.1±13.2 mg DHA/day

ranged from 0 to 36 mg/day

Low egg intake group:

mean = 10.8±4.0 mg DHA/day

ranged from 0 to 36 mg/day

“Mean weight, length, and head circumference of infants in the high-DHA egg group were greater than in the ordinary egg group, and gestation was 5.6 days longer.”

B

High-DHA egg group:

mean = 133±15 mg DHA/egg

ranged from 108 to 165 mg/ egg

Ordinary egg group:

mean = 33±11 mg DHA/egg

ranged from 22 to 51 mg/egg

After controlling for maternal BMI at enrollment and number of prior pregnancies, the mean difference in gestational age between the two groups was 6.0±2.3 days (p=0.009).

After controlling for maternal BMI at enrollment and maternal race, the mean difference in birth weight between the two groups was not significant.

B (gestation only)

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Haugen and Helland, 2001

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=37)

Mean age about 27-31 years

Oslo, Norway

Normotensive without proteinuria, had uncomplicated term pregnancies, randomly taken from another study investigating the influence of omega-3 fatty acids on fetal, neonatal, and child development

Another group had moderate preeclampsia

Cod-liver oil supplement

16-20 weeks gestation through pregnancy

Helland et al., 2001

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=590)

Aged 19-35 years

Oslo, Norway

Single pregnancies, Nulli- or primipara

Intention to breastfeed

No supplement of n-3 LCPUFA earlier during the pregnancy

No premature births, birth asphyxia, infections, and anomalies in the infants that required special attention

Cod-liver oil supplement

17-19 weeks gestation until 3 months after delivery

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Cod-liver oil group: 10 mL/day

Corn-oil group: 10 mL/day

There were no significant differences in gestational age between the four groups (cod-liver oil group, corn oil group, preeclamptic group, and the normotensive group).

Birth weight was significantly higher in the corn oil group compared to the cod-liver oil group (p<0.05) and significantly higher in the normotensive group compared to the preeclamptic group (p<0.0001).

A (birth weight only)

10 mL/day cod-liver oil vs. corn oil

Cod-liver oil group:

803 mg of EPA/10 mL; 1183 mg DHA/10 mL

Corn-oil group:

0 mg of EPA/10 mL; 8.3 mg DHA/10 mL

“There were no significant differences in gestational length or birth weight between the two supplement groups. Birth length, head circumference, and placental weight were also similar in the 2 supplement groups.”

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Olsen et al., 2000

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=1619)

19 hospitals in Denmark, Scotland, Sweden, England, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Belgium, and Russia

Participated in one of six previous trials (four prophylactic trials and two therapeutic trials)

Fish-oil supplement

20 weeks (prophylactic) or 33 weeks (therapeutic) gestation, delivery

Olsen et al., 1992

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=533)

Mean age 29 years

Aarhus, Denmark

Main midwife clinic, covers a well-defined geographic area

No placental abruption in previous pregnancy or serious bleeding in current pregnancy; no prostaglandin inhibitors regularly

No multiple pregnancy, allergy to fish, and regular intake of fish oil

Fish-oil supplement

Enrolled at 30 weeks gestation; end time not specified

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

2.7 g/day fish oil vs. olive oil in the prophylactic trials

6.1 g/day fish oil vs. olive oil in the therapeutic trials

In the trial of women who experienced preterm delivery in an earlier pregnancy, those randomized to fish oil had statistically significant longer gestation duration (difference = 8.5 days) compared to those randomized to olive oil (p=0.01).

In the trial of women who experienced preterm delivery in an earlier pregnancy, those randomized to fish oil had children with a significantly higher mean birth weight (difference = 208.7 g) compared to those randomized to olive oil (p=0.02).

In the trial of women with threatening preeclampsia in the current pregnancy, the mean difference of duration until delivery was 8.8 days less for those randomized to fish oil compared to those randomized to olive oil (p=0.19).

In the trial of women with suspected intrauterine growth retardation in the current pregnancy, the mean difference of weight for gestational age was 29 g higher in those randomized to fish oil compared to those randomized to olive oil (p=0.75).

B

2.7 g/day fish oil vs. olive oil

The average gestational length for those in the fish-oil group was 4 days longer (95% CI 1.5-6.4, p<0.005) than those in the olive oil group.

The average gestational length for those in the fish-oil group was 2.8 days longer (95% CI 0.8-4.8, p<0.01)) than those in the olive-oil and control groups.

Birth weight (p=0.07) and length (p=0.1) trended higher in the fish-oil group than in the olive-oil group (3 way ANOVA between fish oil, olive oil, no oil).

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Olsen and Secher, 1990

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=5022)

Aged 15-44 years

London

People’s League of Health, 1946

Attending antenatal clinics of 10 hospitals

No disease or physical abnormality

EPA/DHA supplement from halibut oil

Enrolled at <24 weeks gestation; treatment lasts for <15 weeks (n=288), 16-19 weeks (n=411), 20-23 weeks (n=414), or 24+ weeks (n=417)

People’s League of Health, 1946

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=5022)

London

Not beyond the 24th week of pregnancy

No physical disease or abnormality

n-3 supplement

 

People’s League of Health, 1942

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=5022)

London

Additional diet, which includes hali-but liver oil

Enrolled if due date more than 16 weeks away; until delivery

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

0.1 g/day of EPA+DHA from halibut oil in supplement vs. no supplement

Supplement includes 0.26 g ferrous iron; 0.26 g calcium; minute quantities of iodine, manganese, and copper; 0.6 g thiamin/g; 0.1 g vitamin C; 0.36 g halibut liver oil

“In primiparae, a 19.9% (p=0.012) reduction in the odds of delivering earlier than 40 weeks was seen in the treatment group, whereas in multiparae a reduction of 21.2% (p=0.028) was seen,” compared to the control group.

“No significant effects were seen on the odds of delivering after 40 weeks of gestation.”

“No significant effects were seen on average birth weight.”

B (gestation only)

 

“A smaller incidence of prematurely was revealed among the treated women, and this is particularly significant since about 50% of infant deaths under 1 month are due to prematurely.”

B

Weekly intake score for consumption of “the more important foodstuffs” such as milk, butter, wholemeal bread, fresh vegetables, fatty fish, fruit, eggs, etc.

Additional diet:

0.26 g ferrous iron; 0.26 g calcium; minute quantities of iodine, manganese, and copper; 1 g adsorbate of vitamin B1; 100 mg vitamin C; 0.36 g halibut liver oil (vitamins A and D)

Among primigravida women, 20.1±1.10% of those who received additional diet experienced a preterm delivery compared to 23.9±1.10% of those who did not receive additional diet. This difference was statistically significant.

Among multiparae women, 20.1±1.33% of those who received additional diet experienced a preterm delivery compared to 24.2±1.33% of those who did not receive additional diet. This difference was statistically significant.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Lucas et al., 2004

Cohort

Postpartum women (n=491) and their infants

Mean age of 23.7 years Inuit

14 coastal villages of Nunavik and southern Quebec

Delivered at Tulattavik Health Center (Ungava Bay) or Inuulitsivik Health Center (Hudson Bay)

Cord venous sample

At delivery

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Tertiles of EPA (% of total fatty acids):

Tertile 1 = <0.21

Tertile 2 = 0.21-0.39

Tertile 3 = >0.39

Tertiles of DHA (% of total fatty acids):

Tertile 1 = <2.99

Tertile 2 = 2.99-4.03

Tertile 3 = >4.03

Tertiles of %n-3 HUFA (% of total HUFA):

Tertile 1 = <18.60

Tertile 2 = 18.60-22.96

Tertile 3 = >22.96

After adjusting for weight gain during pregnancy, gestational diabetes, cord blood mercury, lead, and PCB congener 153, those in the third tertile of n-3 HUFA (% of total HUFA) had significantly longer gestation (278.4 days) compared to those in the first tertile (273.0 days) (p<0.05).

After adjusting for pre-pregnancy weight, weight gain during pregnancy, parity, smoking status during pregnancy, gestational diabetes, age, cord blood mercury, and PCB congener 153, those in the third tertile of n-3 HUFA (% of total HUFA) had babies with a higher birth weight (3551 g) compared to those in the first tertile (3475 g), but this difference was not significant.

There were no significant differences in birth weight or gestation based on the tertiles of EPA and DHA in the cord blood.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Oken et al., 2004

Cohort

Pregnant women (n=2109)

Aged 14-44 years

16% Black, 7% Hispanic-American, 6% Asian-American

Massachusetts

Project Viva

Seafood

Last menstrual period until enrollment, 3 months prior to 26-28 weeks of gestation, the month prior to delivery

Olsen and Secher, 2002

Cohort

Pregnant women (n=8729)

Aarhus, Denmark

Gave birth to singleton, liveborn babies without detected malformations

Had not consumed fish-oil supplements

Seafood

From when first knew of pregnancy until completion of questionnaires at 16 and 30 weeks gestation

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Seafood tertiles:

None or <1 serving/month, the remaining subjects were divided into tertiles with the highest intake group used as the referent

First trimester quartiles of EPA+DHA:

Quartile 1 = 0.00-0.05

Quartile 2 = 0.06-0.12

Quartile 3 = 0.12-0.24

Quartile 4 = 0.24-2.53

Second trimester quartiles of EPA+DHA:

Quartile 1 = 0.00-0.05

Quartile 2 = 0.06-0.12

Quartile 3 = 0.12-0.23

Quartile 4 = 0.24-2.71

Third trimester quartiles of EPA+DHA:

Quartile 1 and 2 = 0.00-0.06

Quartile 3 = 0.60-0.11

Quartile 4 = 0.11-1.72

After adjusting for enrollment site, infant sex, and maternal age, height, intrapartum weight gain, pre-pregnancy BMI, race/ethnicity, smoking during pregnancy, education, and gravidity:

Significant negative trends based on EPA+DHA intake were found for the first trimester [birth weight (p=0.01) and fetal growth (p=0.001)], the second trimester [fetal growth (p=0.03)], and the third trimester [birth weight (p=0.001) and fetal growth (p=0.003)];

No other significant trends were observed for change in birth weight, fetal growth or length of gestation with EPA+DHA intake during the three trimesters;

Significant negative trends were observed for change in birth weight and fetal growth with seafood consumption, but only during the first trimester (p=0.05 and p=0.08, respectively); and

No other significant trends were observed for change in birth weight, fetal growth, or length of gestation with seafood intake during the first two trimesters.

B

0.0, 0.5, 2.0, 4.0, 20.0, 28.0 serving/28 days

Hot fish meal:

144 g fish/serving

1627 µg n-3 fatty acids/serving

Fish sandwich:

29 g fish/serving

431 µg n-3 fatty acids/serving

Fish salad:

50 g fish/serving

149 µg n-3 fatty acids/serving

“Low birth weight, preterm birth, and intrauterine growth retardation all tended to decrease with increasing fish consumption, and mean birth weight, duration of gestation, and birth weight adjusted for gestational age tended to increase with increasing fish consumption.”

Low consumption of seafood was a strong risk factor for preterm delivery and low birth weight. The associations were strongest below a daily intake of 0.15 g long change n-3 fatty acids or 15 g fish.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Grandjean et al., 2001

Cohort

Singleton term births (n=182)

Faroe Islands

Delivered at the National Hospital in Torshavn

Birth at >36 weeks of gestation; no congenital neurological disease

Maternal and cord serum and seafood intake

Maternal blood taken at week 34, cord blood taken at delivery, questionnaire administered 2 weeks after parturition

Olsen et al., 1991

Cohort

Mothers of live-born singleton infants (n=99)

Mean age about 27 years

Faroese (n=62) and Danish women (n=37)

Delivered at the Landssjukrahusid and Aarhus Kommenehospital

No preeclampsia, rhesus immunization, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, or twin pregnancies

Peripheral venous blood sample

5-48 hours after delivery

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Information on fish species or portion sizes was not collected

Fish dinners/week:

0, 1, 2, ≥3

Whale meat dinners/month:

0, 1, ≥2

Whale blubber dinners/month:

0, 1-2, >2

Gestational length showed a significant positive association with cord serum DHA concentration (p<0.001) and DTA (p=0.004).

After adjusting for nonsmoking, average-height and nulliparous mother with term birth of male baby, birth weight showed a significant positive association with cord serum ETA (p=0.001), EPA (p=0.015), and DPA (p=0.002).

After adjusting for gender, parity, gestational length, smoking, and maternal height, birth weight decreases by 246 g for every one unit increase in cord serum EPA concentration (%) (p=0.037).

B

Faroese women:

Mean of 0.83±0.039% EPA

Mean of 2.08±0.059% DPA

Mean of 5.87±0.12% DHA

Mean of 12.07±0.15% AA

Danish women:

Mean of 0.61±0.051% EPA

Mean of 2.08±0.076% DPA

Mean of 4.65±0.159% DHA

Mean of 12.07±0.19% AA

There were no significant differences in gestational age (p=0.3) and birth weight (p=0.1) between the two groups.

After controlling for maternal pre-pregnant weight, height, age, parity, marital status, smoking, and employment during pregnancy a significant association was found between the (3/6) ratio from blood and gestational age in the Danish women (p=0.02) but not in the Faroese women (p=0.6).

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Harper et al., 1991

Case-control

Cases = born to Orkney Island residents, delivered in Orkney Islands (n=899) or Aberdeen (n=116)

Controls = born to Aberdeen City district residents (n=2997)

Singleton live births

Scotland

Resident of Orkney (a proxy for eating more seafood)

 

*B = Evidence of a benefit; A = Evidence of an adverse effect; N = Evidence of no association or no clear association.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

The Orcandians eat 30% more fish than the Aberdonians, but absolute amount undetermined

Mean birth weight of the infants born to residents of Orkney Islands was 3521 g and for residents of Aberdeen was 3287 g (p=0.01).

Gestational age was 0.36 weeks longer in the Orkney women than in the Aberdeen women (p=0.01).

18.3% of infants born to Orkney women and 10.0% of infants born to Aberdeen women were over the 90th percentile for birth weight (corrected for gestational age and parity) (p=0.01).

4.8% of infants born to Orkney women and 12.2% of infants born to Aberdeen women were below the 10th percentile for birth weight (corrected for gestational age and parity) (p=0.01).

Being a resident of Orkney explains a significant proportion of the difference in birth weights between Orkney and Aberdeen women (R2 = 0.489).

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

TABLE B-1d Studies on Development (Anthropometry, Visual Acuity, and Cognition): Effects on Infants of Mothers Who Increase Seafood and/or Omega-3 Fatty Acid Intake

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Cohen et al., 2005

Review

Aggregated 8 randomized controlled trials (one study of maternal dietary supplementation and seven studies of formula supplementation)

DHA supplement

 

Jensen et al., 2005

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=114 in DHA group; n=113 in control group)

Aged 18-40 years

Houston, TX

White (75% DHA group; 79% control group)

African American (19% DHA group; 13% control group)

Gestational age >37 weeks

Infant birth weight 2500-4200 g

No chronic maternal disorders as well as major congenital anomalies and obvious gastrointestinal or metabolic disorders of the infant

DHA supplement

Day 5 after delivery until 4 months postpartum

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

 

An increase in maternal intake of DHA during pregnancy of 1 g/day will increase child IQ by 0.8-1.8 points.

“Prenatal maternal DHA intake increasing the child plasma (RBC) DHA phospholipid fraction by 1% has the same impact on cognitive development as formula DHA supplementation that increases the child’s plasma (RBC) DHA phospholipid fraction by 1%.”

“Because typical DHA intake associated with fish consumption is well under 1 g/day, changes in fish consumption will result in IQ effects amounting to a fraction of a point,” but they are not clinically detectable.

B

DHA capsule:

Algal triacylglycerol

200 mg DHA/day

Control capsule:

Soy and corn oil

There were no significant differences in visual acuity (from either the Teller Acuity Card or Sweep VEP) at 4 or 8 months of age between the two groups.

There were no significant differences in mean transient VEP latency at 4 and 8 months of age between the two groups; but the transient VEP amplitude was significantly lower in the infants of the DHA group compared to the infants of the control group.

There were no significant differences in Gesell Gross Motor Inventory, CAT, CLAMS DQ, or Bayley MDI between the two groups at 12 or 30 months of age; but Bayley PDI at 30 months of age was 8.4 points higher (p=0.005) in infants of the DHA group compared to infants of the control group.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Dunstan et al., 2004

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=83)

Atopic pregnancies

Western Australia

History of doctor diagnosed allergic rhinitis and/or asthma

One or more positive skin prick test to house mites; grass pollens; molds; cat, dog, or cockroach extracts

Nonsmokers

No other medical problems, complicated pregnancies, seafood allergy, or >2 fish meals/week

Term, healthy infants considered at high risk of allergic disease

Fish-oil supplement

20 weeks gestation until delivery

Jensen et al., 2004

Randomized Controlled Trial

Breast-feeding mothers (n=89 in treatment group; n=85 in placebo group)

DHA supplement

Delivery until 4 months postpartum

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Fish-oil group:

3.7 g/day fish oil

56% DHA and 27.7% EPA

4 capsules/day

Olive-oil group: 66.6% n-9 oleic acid and <1% n-3 PUFA

4 capsules/day

Breast milk concentrations of DHA, DPA, and EPA were significantly higher (p<0.001) and AA was significantly lower (p=0.045) in fish-oil supplemented mothers compared with controls.

“There were no significant differences in the detection or level of free cytokines or IgA between the 2 groups.”

N/A

200 mg/day of DHA vs. placebo

There were no significant differences between the two groups in visual function or neurodevelopment until 30 months of age.

At age 30 months, the Bayley PDI of infants whose mothers were randomized to DHA was 0.55 standard deviations higher (p<0.01) than that of infants whose mothers were randomized to the placebo.

There were no significant differences between the two groups in visual function; transient VEP; sweep VEP; stereoacuity; and gross and fine motor, executive, perceptual/visual or verbal domains at age 5.

At age 5, infants whose mothers were randomized to DHA had significantly higher Sustained Attention Subtest of the Leiter International Performance Scale than those whose mothers were randomized to the placebo (p<0.008).

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Helland et al., 2003

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=48 in cod-liver oil group; n=36 in corn oil group)

Aged 19-35 years

Oslo, Norway

Healthy women with, singleton pregnancy, nulli- or primiparous, intention to breastfeed

No supplement of n-3 LCPUFA earlier during pregnancy, premature births, birth asphyxia, general infections, or anomalies in the infants that required special attention

Cod-liver oil supplement

From 18 weeks of pregnancy until 3 months after delivery

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Cod-liver oil:

10 mL/day

1183 mg DHA, 803 mg EPA

Corn oil:

10 mL/day

4747 mg LA, 92 mg ALA

K-ABC scores were significantly higher for the subset MPCOMP among children from the cod-liver oil group compared to the corn oil group (p=0.049). The scores for the other subtests (SEQPROC, SIMPROC, NONVERB) were also higher in the cod-liver oil group compared to the corn oil group, but they were not significant.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Auestad et al., 2001

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=294 formula fed; n=165 breastfed)

Kansas City, MO; Little Rock, AR; Pittsburgh, PA; Tucson, AZ

Good health, term status, either ≤9 days of age (formula group) or ≤11 days of age and currently breastfeeding (breastfeeding group), birth weight ≥2500 g, 5-minute APGAR score ≥7, ability to tolerate milk-based formula or breast milk, guardian or parent agreement to feed the assigned study formula ad libitum according to the study design

No evidence of significant cardiac, respiratory, ophthalmologic, gastrointestinal, hematologic, or metabolic disease; milk-protein allergy; or a maternal medical history known to have proven adverse effects on the fetus, tuberculosis, HIV, perinatal infections, or substance abuse

61-74% European American

60-80% mothers married

Mean mother’s age about 29 years

Mean mother’s education about 14 years

Fish oil/fungal oil and egg-derived triglyceride supplemented formulas

9-11 days after birth until 12 months of age

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Fish oil and fungal oil supplemented preterm formula:

0.46 g AA/100 g total fatty acids

≤0.04 g EPA/100 g total fatty acids

0.13 g DHA/100 g total fatty acids

Egg-derived triglyceride supplemented preterm formula:

0.45 g AA/100 g total fatty acids

No detected EPA

0.14 g DHA/100 g total fatty acids

Control formula:

No detected AA, EPA, DHA

The vocabulary expression score at 14 months was significantly higher in the fish/fungal group than in the egg-TG group (p<0.05).

Smiling and laughter was significantly higher in the control group than in the egg-TG group (p=0.05).

No other development, cognition, vocabulary, or temperament outcomes presented were significantly difference between the formula groups.

No significant differences were found between groups for weight, length, and head circumference or visual acuity.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Helland et al., 2001

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=590)

Aged 19-35 years

Oslo, Norway

Single pregnancies, nulli-or primipara

Intention to breastfeed

No supplement of n-3 LCPUFA earlier during the pregnancy

No premature births, birth asphyxia, infections, and anomalies in the infants that required special attention

Cod-liver oil supplement

17-19 weeks gestation until 3 months after delivery

McCann and Ames, 2005

Review

Summary of observational, RCTs, other experimental and animal studies

LCPUFA supplement

 

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

10 mL/day cod-liver oil vs. corn oil

Cod-liver oil:

803 mg of EPA/10 mL; 1183 mg DHA/10 mL

Corn oil:

0 mg of EPA/10 mL; 8.3 mg DHA/10 mL

“There were no significant differences in gestational length or birth weight between the 2 supplement groups. Birth length, head circumference, and placental weight were also similar in the 2 supplement groups.”

N

 

“Evidence from chronic dietary restriction rodent studies … shows that the addition of DHA to diets of animals whose brain concentration of DHA have been severely reduced restored control performance levels.”

“Formula comparison and maternal supplementation studies in humans and ALA dietary restriction studies in nonhuman primates both link the availability of n-3 LCPUFAs to the development of visual attention” and higher DHA status to enhanced neuromotor development.

RCTs in humans have often shown no effect of “LCPUFA supplementation on cognitive or behavioral performance and some reviewers have considered that, overall, the evidence was insufficient to conclude that LCPUFA supplementation benefited development.”

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Koletzko et al., 2001

Review

Studies published in full or in abstract form

LCPUFA supplement

Prenatal and postnatal periods

Makrides and Gibson, 2000

Review

Summary of the evidence

LCPUFA supplement

During pregnancy and lactation

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

 

“Breastfeeding, which supplies preformed LCPUFA, is the preferred method of feeding for healthy infants and is strongly supported.”

“Infant formulas should contain at least 0.2% of total fatty acids as DHA and 0.35% as AA; formulas for preterm infants should include at least 0.35% DHA and 0.4% AA.”

There is an absence of published studies showing direct functional benefits of supplementation of LCPUFA and studies to determine if the variability in LCPUFA status among pregnant women is related to functions in either the mother or infant.

“It seems prudent for pregnant and lactating women to include some food sources of DHA in their diet.”

B

 

“There appears to be no detectable reduction in plasma n-3 LCPUFA concentrations during pregnancy, whereas there is a clear decline during the early postpartum period.”

“Results of randomized clinical studies suggest that n-3 LCPUFA supplementation during pregnancy does not affect the incidences of pregnancy-induced hypertension and preeclampsia without edema.”

“n-3 LCPUFA supplementation may cause modest increases in the duration of gestation, birth weight, or both.”

“To date there is little evidence of harm as a result of n-3 LCPUFA supplementation during either pregnancy or lactation.”

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Leary et al., 2005

Cohort

Mother-child pairs (n=6944)

Bristol, England

Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)

Diet

During pregnancy, unspecified

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Carbohydrate (g) 182-218, 218-258, >258

Protein (g) 55-66, 66-79, >79

Total fat (g) 55-68, 68-84, >84

Saturated fat (g) 21-27, 27-35, >35

Polyunsaturated fat (g) 9-12, 12-16, >16

Monounsaturated fat (g) 19-24, 24-30, >30

Calcium (mg) 759-938, 939-1127, >1127

Potassium (mg) 2177-2582, 2583-3021, >3021

Magnesium (mg) 207-254, 255-308, >308

Protein/carbohydrate 0.26-0.30, 0.31-0.35, >0.35

Animal protein (g) 35-44, 44-53, >53

Omega-3 fatty acids (g) 0.03-0.09, 0.10-0.27, >0.27

After adjusting for sex, child’s age for blood pressure, and maternal pregnancy energy intake, a significant inverse association was found between omega-3 fatty acids and offspring blood pressure at age 7.5 years (p=0.04).

After adjusting for sex, child’s age for blood pressure, and maternal pregnancy energy intake, there were no significant differences in offspring blood pressure at age 7.5 years based on maternal intake of carbohydrate, protein, total fat, saturated fat, polyunsaturated fat, monounsaturated fat, calcium, potassium, magnesium, protein/carbohydrate or animal protein.

After adjusting for measurement factors, current anthropometry, maternal and social factors, birth weight, and gestation, there was a significant positive association found between maternal intake of carbohydrates and offspring blood pressure at 7.5 years (p=0.04).

After adjusting for measurement factors, current anthropometry, maternal and social factors, birth weight, and gestation, there were no significant differences between the tertiles of maternal intake of protein, total fat, saturated fat, polyunsaturated fat, monounsaturated fat, calcium, potassium, magnesium, protein/carbohydrate, animal protein, or omega-3 fatty acid and offsprings’ systolic blood pressure at age 7.5 years.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Oken et al., 2005

Cohort

Mother-infant pairs (n=135)

Aged <30 years (n=16)

Aged 30-34 years (n=53)

Aged ≥35 years (n=31)

82% White; 18% non-White

80% college or graduate degree

Massachusetts

Singleton pregnancy, were able to complete forms in English, did not plan to move out of the study area before delivery

Project Viva

Seafood

Second trimester of pregnancy

Colombo et al., 2004

Cohort

Infants (n=70)

Mean gestation 39.29 weeks

Mean birth weight 3248.57 g

Mean APGAR score (1 min) 7.94

Mean APGAR score (5 min) 8.80

Mean education (11.77 years for mother and 11.88 for father)

77% African American

21% Caucasian

1% Hispanic

Kansas

DHA-enriched egg

24-28 weeks gestation until delivery

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Number of servings/week:

Canned tuna fish (3-4 oz/serving)

Shrimp/lobster/scallop/clam (1 serving)

Dark meat fish (3-5 oz/serving)

Other fish (3-5 oz/serving)

6 responses from never or less than 1/month to 1 or more servings/day

After controlling for maternal hair mercury level, age, race/ethnicity, education, marital status, infant sex, gestational age at birth, birth weight for gestational age, breast-feeding duration and age at cognitive testing:

Each 1 serving/week increase of fish intake increases the VRM score by 4 points (%novelty preference; 95% CI 1.3-6.7).

After controlling for maternal seafood intake, age, race/ethnicity, education, marital status, infant sex, gestational age at birth, birth weight for gestational age, breast-feeding duration, and age at cognitive testing:

Each 1 ppm increase in maternal hair mercury levels decreases the VRM score by 7.5 points (%novelty preference; 95% CI −13.7 to −1.2).

B

This study is a follow-up to an RCT

High-DHA eggs: 135 mg DHA/egg

Ordinary eggs: 35 mg DHA/egg

“Infant red blood cell DHA level was unrelated to subsequent attentional measures, but maternal red blood cell DHA was consistently predictive of later attentional outcomes.”

“Infants whose mothers had higher levels of DHA at birth showed accelerated developmental courses in attention across the 1st year.”

Percent of time spent looking in orienting increased over time in both the high- and low-DHA groups, but it was larger in the high-DHA group compared to the low-DHA group at 4, 6, and 8 months.

Percent of time spent looking in sustained attention declined over time in both groups, but it was smaller in the high-DHA group compared to the low-DHA group at 4, 6, and 8 months.

Percent of time spent looking in attention termination was larger at 4 months in the low-DHA group compared to the high-DHA group, and then declined and leveled off at 6 months in both groups.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Daniels et al., 2004

Cohort

Infants (n=1054)

Mothers’ mean age = 29 years

Majority of mothers with at least an O (moderate) level education

Bristol, UK

Singleton, term births

Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)

Seafood

Maternal fish intake: 32 weeks of gestation

Breastfeeding practices: 15 months after birth

Infant fish intake: 6 and 12 months after birth

Total mercury concentration: Cord blood at birth

Sakamoto et al., 2004

Cohort

Pregnant women (n=63)

Aged 21-41 years

Japan

Planning to deliver at Munakata Suikokai General Hospital, Fukuoka

Healthy

Maternal blood and umbilical cord blood lipids

Umbilical cord blood at birth and maternal blood 1 day after parturition before breakfast

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Maternal fish intake categories (during pregnancy):

1 = Rarely/never

2 = 1 meal/2 weeks

3 = 1-3 meals/week

4 = 4+ meals/week

Child fish intake categories (6 months of age):

1 = Rarely/never

2 = 1+ meal/week

Child fish intake categories (12 months of age):

1 = Rarely/never

2 = 1+ meal/week

Children whose mothers ate 1-3 fish meals/week and 4+ fish meals/week had significantly lower odds of low MCDI scores for social activity (OR=0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.8 and OR=0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.9, respectively) than the children whose mothers rarely or never ate fish during pregnancy.

Children whose mothers ate 1-3 fish meals/week and 4+ fish meals/week had significantly lower odds of low DDST scores for language (OR=0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.9 and OR=0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.9, respectively) than the children whose mothers rarely or never ate fish during pregnancy.

Children who ate 1+ fish meals/week had significantly lower odds of low MCDI scores for vocabulary comprehension (OR=0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.8) and social activity (OR=0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.9) and total DDST scores (OR=0.8, 95% CI 0.6-0.9).

All other odds ratios presented were nonsignificant.

B

Unspecified

In all cases, fetal RBC-Hg levels (13.4 ng/g) were statistically higher than maternal RBC-Hg levels (8.41 ng/g) (p<0.01).

“A strong correlation was observed in RBC-Hg between mothers and fetuses (r=0.92, p<0.001).”

“Maternal RBC-Hg concentrations showed significant correlation coefficients with maternal plasma EPA (r=0.36, p<0.001) and DHA (r=0.33, p<0.005) concentrations.”

“Fetal RBC-Hg concentrations showed a significant positive correlation with fetal plasma EPA (r=0.32, p<0.05) and DHA (r=0.35, p<0.01).”

N/A

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Willatts et al., 2003

Cohort

Mother and infant pairs (n=96)

Term pregnancy and infant birth weight >2499 g

Dundee

DHA and AA content in maternal red blood cells

34-36 weeks gestation

Cheruku et al., 2002

Cohort

Pregnant women (n=17)

Men aged 29 years in the high-DHA group

Men aged 24 years in the low-DHA group

White (n=14)

Hispanic (n=3)

Windham, CT

≥4 hours of crib time in the first and second days postpartum

No history of chronic hypertension, hyperlipidemia, renal or liver disease, heart disease, thyroid disorders, multiple gestations, or pregnancy-induced complications

No drugs that affect the respiration of newborns, such as magnesium sulfate and butorphanol

Maternal plasma DHA

Day 1 and day 2 postpartum

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Absolute DHA and AA levels in blood unspecified

After adjusting for maternal education, social class, birth weight, gestation, type of feeding at birth, and infant age at time of assessment:

“There was a significant negative relation between maternal DHA and peak look duration (p<0.05), and a significant positive relation between maternal DHA and visual acuity (p<0.01)” at 4 months of age. The relation between AA and peak look duration and visual acuity at 4 months of age were not significant.

“These results suggest that higher maternal DHA status is related to more efficient information processing and improved visual acuity development in 4-month-old infants.”

B

High-DHA group (maternal plasma):

>3.0% by weight of total fatty acids

Low-DHA group (maternal plasma):

≤3.0% by weight of total fatty acids

On day 2 postpartum, the low-DHA group had significantly higher sleep-wake transition (% of time in crib) and less wakefulness (% time in crib) than the high-DHA group (p<0.05).

There was a significant group effect for active sleep time (p=0.004) and active:quick sleep time (p=0.001), these times being shorter in the high-DHA group than in the low-DHA group.

“Differences in the prenatal supply of LCPUFAs, especially DHA, may modify brain phospholipids and affect neural function.”

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Haggerty et al., 2002

Cohort

Mothers, smokers (n=11)

Mothers, nonsmokers (n=13)

Aberdeen, Scotland

Uncomplicated, full-term pregnancies

Perfusion on term placentas delivered vaginally or by elective Caesarean section from otherwise uncomplicated pregnancies

Placental tissue lipids

Within 20 minutes of delivery

Innis et al., 2001

Cohort

Infants (n=83)

Term

Birth weight 2500-4500 g

Mean mother’s age of 32 years

British Colombia

Intend to breast-feed for 3 months, no solid foods for at least the first 4 months after birth

No mothers with substance abuse, communicable diseases, metabolic or physiologic problems, infections likely to influence fetal growth, or multiple births

No infants with evidence of metabolic or physical abnormalities

Fatty acids in blood from infants and milk from mothers

2 months of age

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Unspecified

The rates of transfer of LA and AA per perfused area were not different between the groups; “neither was the rate of placental transfer of ALA and DHA affected by smoking during pregnancy.”

“In the non-smoking control group the placenta selectively transferred polyunsaturated fatty acids to the fetus in the order DHA > AA > ALA > LA. The order of selectivity was unaltered in placentas from smokers, but the addition of ethanol to the perfusion medium altered the order of selectivity to AA > ALA > LA > DHA.”

“The presence of ethanol in the perfusate at a concentration of 2 mg/ml significantly reduced (p<0.01) the absolute rate of transfer of ALA and DHA.”

N/A

Infant DHA: (g/100 g fatty acids)

Plasma phospholipids = 2.2-8.0

RBC PE = 6.3-13.0

PC = 1.4-4.6

Infant AA: (g/100 g fatty acids)

Plasma phospholipids = 8.1-15.8

RBC PE = 20.2-27.8

PC = 5.6-9.7

Mother’s milk: (g/100 g milk fatty acids)

DHA = 0.10-2.50

AA = 0.20-0.81

LA = 6.30-21.50

LNA = 0.50-4.10

“The ability to correctly discriminate a retroflex compared with dental phonetic contrast at 9 months of age was positively correlated with the plasma phospholipid DHA (p<0.02) and the RBC PE at 2 months of age (p=0.02).”

“There were no significant correlations between the infants’ AA status and the ability to discriminate the native or nonnative language contrasts.”

“There were no significant correlations between the infant DHA or AA status at 2 months of age and test scores for novelty preference, or the job search task, with adjustments for covariates included in the model.”

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Otto et al., 2001

Cohort

Pregnant women (n=57)

Mean age around 30 years

Southern Limburg, Netherlands

No metabolic, cardiovascular, neurologic, or renal disorders

No medications, except multivitamins and iron supplements

Singleton pregnancy

Term delivery

No blood transfusions in the perinatal period

Plasma phospholipids

36-37 weeks gestation; 2-5 days after delivery; 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 weeks postpartum

Williams et al., 2001

Cohort

Boys and girls (n=435)

Mean age of 3.5 years

Born in last 6 months of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) enrollment period

Healthy term infants

Seafood

During pregnancy for the mothers and at 4 weeks, 4 months, and 6 months for the infants

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Absolute amount not specified

“After delivery, total fatty acids in plasma phospholipids decreased significantly over time in the lactating and nonlactating women (p<0.0001).”

“The amounts of ALA, DHA, and total n-3 fatty acids showed significant downward trends postpartum in both groups, whereas the amounts of EPA and DPA increased significantly after delivery.”

N/A

Oily fish consumption categories:

1 = Never or rarely

2 = Once every 2 weeks

3 = More than once every 2 weeks

White fish = cod, haddock, plaice, and fish fingers

Oily fish = pilchards, sardines, mackerel, tuna, herring, kippers, trout, and salmon

After adjusting for breastfeeding, sex, maternal education, maternal age, housing tenure, financial difficulties, maternal smoking, number of older siblings in household, child care, maternal job status, mother is a vegetarian, mother’s fish eating habits:

“Mothers who ate oily fish at least once every 2 weeks during pregnancy were more likely to have children who achieved foveal steroacuity than were the mothers who never ate oily fish (OR=1.57, 95% CI 1.00-2.45),” but this was not significant.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Haggerty et al., 1999

Cohort

Pregnant women (n=10)

Mean age of 31.3 years

In last trimester of pregnancy

31-38 weeks gestational age

Aberdeen, Scotland

Healthy

Fatty acid composition of maternal perfusate

31-38 weeks gestation

Haggerty et al., 1997

Cohort

Term placentae (n=9)

Mean weight of 566 g

Delivered vaginally or by elective caesarean section

Uncomplicated pregnancies

Nonsmokers

Placental tissue lipids

Within 20 minutes of delivery

Al et al., 1995

Cohort

Pregnant women (n=110)

Aged 19-43 years

Maastricht, Netherlands

Caucasian

Singleton pregnancy

DBP <90 mmHg

No metabolic, cardiovascular, neurological or renal disorder

Maternal venous and umbilical vein fatty acid profiles

10, 14, 18, 22, 26, 30, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40 weeks gestation; after delivery; 6 months after delivery

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Unspecified

“When perfused with fatty acids in the ratios found in maternal circulating triglyceride, the human placenta selectively transfers PUFA to the fetus in the order: DHA > ALA > LA > AA.”

“The ultimate source of fatty acids for the placenta is important for estimates of the likely supply of individual PUFA/LCPUFA to the fetus in utero.”

“The biggest determinant of transfer of individual fatty acids from the mother to fetus is the supply of fatty acids available in the maternal circulation.”

N/A

Unspecified

“The order of selectivity for placental transfer to the fetal circulation was DHA > ALA > LA > oleic acid, whilst the proportion of AA transferred was actually lower than that for oleic acid.”

“There was no evidence of chain elongation of LA or ALA to any LCPUFA of the n-6 or n-3 series in the perfused placenta.”

N/A

Absolute amount not specified

“The average amount of total fatty acid in maternal venous plasma phospholipids increased significantly (p<0.0001) during pregnancy, but the rise in total fatty acids became less pronounced towards the end of gestation (p<0.0001).”

Total fatty acids increased from 1238.11 mg/L at week 10 to 1867.84 mg/L at week 40 of gestation, and all of the fatty acid families showed a similar course.

“The mean amount of total fatty acids in umbilical plasma phospholipids was substantially lower (p<0.0001) than all maternal values” for all fatty acid families.

“In contrast to the absolute amounts of AA and DHA, the mean relative amounts of AA and DHA in umbilical plasma phospholipids were significantly (p<0.0001) higher than all maternal values.”

N/A

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Clandinin et al., 1980b

Cohort

Male infants (n=14)

Female infants (n=7)

Died within 3 days of birth

Toronto, Canada

Infants died from intrapartum asphyxia, congenital heart disease, sudden infant death syndrome, diaphragmatic hernia, and accidental causes

Infants were of normal body weight and weight for length, with the exception of two infant males; infants had normal head circumference, with the exception of one infant male

No infections or gastrointestinal disorders, apparently normally nourished, and growing reasonably well until the time of death

Tissue fatty acid content from frontal and occipital brain lobes and cerebellum

16 hours postmortem

Bjerve et al., 1993

Case-control

Cases = adults (n=156)

Controls = normal human serum stored at −80 degrees C

Aged >40 years

Nord-Trondelag, Norway

Previously undiagnosed diabetic patients

Preterm infants (n=21)

Very low birth weight, with birth weight <1500 g seen consecutively at the Department of Pediatrics

Seafood and dietary DHA and AA intake

10 weeks for adults and 1 year for the preterms

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

 

“Postnatal brain growth, expressed as wet weight of brain tissue, increased during the postpartum period, but was not as rapid as intrauterine brain growth.”

“In contrast to the fatty acid components, postpartum levels of LA increased 4-fold relative to prenatal levels; postpartum brain levels of AA do not differ from those observed in brain during the third trimester.”

“Chain elongation-desaturation of AA and LA to longer-chain homologues does not occur at maximal rates for several weeks postnatally or, alternatively, that these long-chain homologues if synthesized in extracerebral tissues may not be directed into synthesis of brain tissue during this early period of infant development.”

N/A

Number of fish meals per week: <2, 2, 3, and ≥4

Mean AA intake of these groups: (g/day)

1.22, 1.19, 1.31, 1.59

“After controlling for age, gender, BMI, alcohol intake, and smoking, there was a statistically significant positive correlation based on individual observations between increasing number of fish meals and the concentration of plasma phospholipid EPA (p<0.001) and DHA (p<0.001).”

After controlling for APGAR score and weight at 1 year, 82% of the variance in MDI was explained by a model including the inverse of both DHA and EPA (p=0.0001).

After controlling for weight at 1 year, 64% of the variance in PDI was explained by a model including the inverse of DHA (p=0.0001).

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Uauy et al., 1990

Case-control

Case = infants fed formula by day 10 (n=32)

Control = infants fed their own mother’s milk from birth (n=10)

Birth weight appropriate for gestational age, able to receive enteral feedings, free of major neonatal morbidity by day 10

Human milk and milk formula

Day 10 until 36 weeks old

Makrides et al., 1994

Cross-sectional

Male infants (n=16)

Female infants (n=19)

Died between weeks 2 and 48

South Australia

All but two born at term

Human milk and milk formula

Within 48 weeks of birth

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Human milk:

12.7 g/100 g AA, 1.5 g/100 g n-6 > C18, 0.8 g/100 g ALA, 0.5 g/100 g n-3>C18

Formula A:

24.2 g/100 g AA, 0.0 g/100 g n-6 > C18, 0.5 g/100 g ALA, 0.0 g/100 g n-3>C18

Formula B:

20.8 g/100 g AA, 0.0 g/100 g n-6 > C18, 2.7 g/100 g ALA, 0.0 g/100 g n-3>C18

Formula C:

20.4 g/100 g AA, 0.1 g/100 g n-6 > C18, 1.4 g/100 g ALA, 1.0 g/100 g n-3>C18

“Group C was comparable to the human milk-fed group, but Group A had lower DHA and n-3 LCPUFA in plasma and RBC membranes.”

“Cone function was not affected by dietary essential fatty acids.”

“Rod electroretinogram thresholds were significantly higher for Group A relative to the human milk-fed infants and Group C and significantly correlated with RBC n-3 LCPUFA (p<0.0001).”

“Rod electroretinogram amplitude was significantly lower for Group A relative to the human milk-fed infants and Group C and related to plasma DHA and total n-3 LCPUFA (p<0.0001).”

N/A

Breast-feeding index = length of breastfeeding as a % of age at death:

Breast-fed: ≥85%

Formula fed: <30%

LA in formula ranged from 12.0% to 15.0% and ALA in formula ranged from 1.0% to 1.6%

Erythrocyte fatty acid composition of tissues were significantly lower in total saturated fatty acids (p<0.05), AA (p<0.05), and DHA (p<0.05) and significantly higher in DGLA (p<0.05), EPA (p<0.05), and DPA (p<0.05) for infants fed formula compared to those fed from the breast.

Cortex fatty acid composition of tissues were significantly higher in 22:4n-6 (p<0.05), 22:5n-6 (p<0.05), and total n-6 (p<0.005) and lower in DHA (p<0.005) and total n-3 (p<0.005) for infants fed formula compared to those fed from the breast.

There were no significant differences in retina fatty acid composition of tissues between the formula-fed and breast-fed infants.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Farquharson et al., 1992

Cross-sectional

Term infants (n=20)

Preterm infants (n=2)

Greater Glasgow Health Board area

Died within 43 weeks of birth

Previously well infants who died suddenly in the home, “cot deaths”

Human milk and milk formula

Within 43 weeks of birth

Martinez, 1992

Cross-sectional

Infants born at different gestational ages and died soon after birth of acute causes that were not related to the central nervous system

Not fed but mothers well-nourished

Infants nourished in utero and after birth

PUFA supplementation and PUFA-enriched formula

After infant died (they died shortly after birth)

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Breast milk or the formula milks SMA Gold Cap and/or White Cap, Cow and Gate Premium, or Osterfeed

“Breast fed infants had greater concentrations of DHA in their cerebral cortex phospholipids than either the mixed fed group or the older SMA and CGOST groups.”

“No significant differences in phospholipid fatty acid content of cerebral cortex were found between the age-comparable SMA and CGOST groups.”

N/A

Prenatal fatty acid amounts not specified

“Long-chain fatty acids accumulate in the human brain during the brain’s growth spurt unless a serious imbalance in the supply of LA and ALA occurs.”

“The active formation of synaptic structures and dendritic arborizations increases significantly between 31 weeks of gestation and term.”

“It seems highly desirable to enrich parenteral lipids and milk formulas with DHA to provide between 0.5% and 1% of total fatty acids similar to those in human milk.”

“A total n-6/n-3 fatty acid ratio between 5 and 7 seems appropriate according to our analysis of human milk from others consuming complete, balanced Mediterranean diets rich in fish.”

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Kodas et al., 2004

Animal

2 generations of female Wistar rats

ALA-deficient diet

Control group: Control diet at birth to 60 days after birth

Deficient group: Deficient diet at birth to 60 days after birth

Diet reversed group 1: Control diet at day of birth until 60 days after birth

Diet reversed group 2: Deficient diet until day 7 of life and then control diet from day 7 to day 60 of life

Diet reversed group 3: Deficient diet until day 14 of life and then control diet from day 14 to day 60 of life

Diet reversed group 4: Deficient diet until day 21 of life and then control diet from day 21 to day 60 of life

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

ALA-deficient diet:

6% fat African peanut oil

<6 mg ALA/100 g diet

1200 mg LA/100 g diet

Control diet:

60% peanut oil, 40% rapeseed oil

200 mg ALA/100 g diet

1200 mg LA/100 g diet

The fatty acid composition of phosphatidylcholine in the hippocampus of 2-month-old rats was as follows:

AA was not significantly different among the different diet groups; DHA was significantly higher in the control group and all diet reversed groups compared to the deficient group (p<0.05); n-6:n-3 was significantly lower in the control group and all diet reversed groups compared to the deficient group (p<0.05); these differences were not significant between the control group and the diet reversed groups.

The fatty acid composition of phosphatidylethanolamine in the hippocampus of 2-month-old rats was as follows:

AA was significantly lower in the control group and all diet reversed groups compared to the deficient group (p<0.05); DHA was significantly higher in the control group and all diet reversed groups compared to the deficient group (p<0.05); n-6:n-3 was significantly lower in the control group and all diet reversed groups compared to the deficient group (p<0.05); these differences were not significant between the control group and the diet reversed groups.

The fatty acid composition of phosphatidylserine in the hippocampus of 2-month-old rats was as follows:

AA was not significantly different among the different diet groups; DHA was significantly higher in the control group and all diet reversed groups compared to the deficient group (p<0.05); n-6:n-3 was significantly lower in the control group and all diet reversed groups compared to the deficient group (p<0.05); these differences were not significant between the control group and the diet reversed groups; and

Basal 5-HT levels were significantly higher in the deficient group compared with the control group (p<0.05); there were no significant differences in basal 5-HT levels between the diet reversed groups 1, 2, and 3 and the control group; there were no significant differences in basal 5-HT levels between the diet reversed group 4 and the control group, deficient group, and all other diet reversed groups.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Korotokova et al., 2004

Animal

Pregnant Sprauge-Dawley rats

n-6:n-3 diet, n-3 diet, and n-6 diet

10 days before delivery

10-16 days of lactation, dam fed water with ovalbumin or just water

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

n-6:n-3 diet (in mol%):

7.0% soybean oil

56.0% LA, 6.2% ALA, 9.0% n-6:n-3

n-3 diet (in mol%):

7.0% linseed oil

14.0% LA, 33.0% ALA, 0.4% n-6:n-3

n-6 diet (in mol%):

7.0% sunflower oil

65.0% LA, 0.3% ALA, 216.0% n-6:n-3

In the pups not exposed to ovalbumin:

Delayed-type hypersensitivity responses against ovalbumin, as well as against human serum ovalbumin were not significantly different between the dietary groups;

IgG anti-avalbumin and IgG anti-human serum ovalbumin antibodies were not significant different between the three diet groups;

IgM anti-ovalbumin antibodies in the n-3 diet group are significantly higher than those in the n-6:n-3 diet group (p<0.05); and

IgM anti-human serum ovalbumin antibodies in the n-3 diet group are significantly higher that those in the n-6: n-3 diet group (p<0.05).

In the pups exposed to ovalbumin:

Delayed-hypersensitivity responses against ovalbumin were significantly higher in the n-6:n-3 diet group compared to the n-3 diet group and the n-6 diet group, while delayed-hypersensitivity responses to human serum ovalbumin were significantly higher in the n-6:n-3 diet group compared to the n-3 diet group (p<0.05);

IgG anti-human serum ovalbumin antibodies were significantly higher in the n-6:n-3 diet group than those in the n-3 diet group (p<0.05); and

IgM anti-human serum ovalbumin antibodies in the n-3 diet group are significantly lower than those in the n-6: n-3 diet group and the n-6 diet group (p<0.05).

Those in the n-3 diet group exposed to ovalbumin have significantly lower IgG ovalbumin, IgG anti-human serum ovalbumin, IgM anti-ovalbumin, and IgM anti-human serum ovalbumin antibodies than those not exposed to ovalbumin (p<0.05).

Those in the n-6 diet group exposed to ovalbumin have significantly lower IgG ovalbumin and IgM anti-ovalbumin antibodies than those not exposed to ovalbumin (p<0.05).

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Levant et al., 2004

Animal

Adult female Long-Evans rats

LCPUFA-deficient diet

Control diet: Day 1 of pregnancy until end of study

Deficient diet: Day 1 of pregnancy until postnatal day 21. Postnatal day 21, half on deficient diet were changed to remediation diet and half stayed on deficient diet

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Control diet: 0.35 kg/5 kg diet from soybean oil; no detected AA, EPA, DPA, or DHA

Deficient diet: 0.35 kg/5 kg diet from sunflower oil; no detected AA, EPA, DPA, or DHA

Remediation diet: 0.3275 kg/5 kg diet from sunflower oil and 0.0225 kg/5 kg diet from fish oil

0.1 g/100 g fatty acids AA, 1.6 g/100 g fatty acids EPA, 0.4 g/100 g fatty acids DPA, 3.5 g/100 g fatty acids DHA

“Rats raised on the deficient diet exhibited a decrease in brain DHA content to 80% of control animals at maturity (p<0.05)” and an “increase in DPA content to 575% of control animals at maturity (p<0.001).”

The remediation diet restored brain DHA and DPA content to levels similar to those on the control diet.

Catalepsy score was significantly lower in the deficient diet group compared to the control group (p<0.05) and the remediation diet group (p<0.05).

In a test of locomotor activity in a novel environment, the deficient diet group exhibited 187% of the activity of the control diet group during the 2-hour observation (p<0.05); results were similar between the deficient diet group and the remediation diet group.

In the test of amphetamine-stimulated locomotor activity, the deficient diet group exhibited 144% of the activity of the control group (p<0.05).

A

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Neuringer et al., 1986

Animal

Adult female rhesus monkeys

n-3-deficient diet

2 months before conception and throughout pregnancy

*B = Evidence of a benefit; N = Evidence of no association or no clear association; N/A = A conclusion is not available; these data are presented for background information only; A = Evidence of an adverse effect.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Semipurified diet:

Deficient in n-3 fatty acids

Safflower oil was sole fat source

High n-6:n-3 ratio

Controls:

Soybean oil was sole fat source

High in LA

At all ages, animals of the “deficient group had considerably lower levels of n-3 fatty acids in tissue phospholipids than their controls.”

Based on the occipital cortex, perinatal 22:5n-6 (p<0.01) and total n-6 (p<0.05) were significantly higher and perinatal DHA (p<0.01) and total n-3 (p<0.01) were significantly lower in the deficient group compared to the control group.

Based on the occipital cortex, 22:4n-6 (p<0.01), 22:5n-6 (p<0.01), and total n-6 (p<0.01) at 22 months were significantly higher and DHA (p<0.01) and total n-3 (p<0.01) at 22 months were significantly lower in the deficient group compared to the control group.

Based on the frontal cortex, perinatal 22:5n-6 (p<0.01) was significantly higher and perinatal DHA (p<0.01) and total n-3 (p<0.01) were significantly lower in the deficient group compared to the control group.

Based on the frontal cortex, 22:5n-6 (p<0.01) and total n-6 (p<0.01) at 22 months were significant higher and DHA (p<0.01) and total n-3 (p<0.01) at 22 months were significantly lower in the deficient group compared to the control group.

N/A

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

TABLE B-1e Studies on Allergies: Effects on Infants and Children of Mothers Who Increase Seafood and/or Omega-3 Fatty Acid Intake

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Denburg et al., 2005

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=83)

Booked for delivery at St. John of God Hospital

Subiaco, Western Australia

With confirmed allergy

No smoking, other medical problems, complicated pregnancies, seafood allergy; normal dietary intake did not exceed two meals of fish per week

Fish-oil supplement

20 weeks of pregnancy until delivery

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Fish oil group:

3.7 g of n-3 PUFA

56.0% as DHA and 27.7% as EPA

Placebo group:

2.6 g olive oil

26 g/day oleic acid

Infants of those in the fish oil group had a significantly higher %CD34 expression than infants of those in the placebo group (p<0.002).

There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to expression of all cytokine and chemokine receptors.

There was a significant association found between CD34+ in cord blood and AEDS (OR=3.93; 95% CI 1.05-14.64, p=0.042) at one year of age; however, there were no significant associations found for food allergy, moderate severe AEDS, asthma, chronic cough, or recurrent wheeze.

There were significant associations found between cord blood progenitor responsiveness to IL-5 and AEDS (OR=1.09, 95% CI 1.00-1.18, p=0.039) and recurrent wheeze (OR=1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.21, p=0.022) at one year of age; however, there were no significant associations found for food allergy, moderate severe AEDS, asthma, or chronic cough.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Dunstan et al., 2003a

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=83)

Atopic women

Booked for delivery at St. John of God Hospital

Subiaco, Western Australia

Physician-diagnosed allergic rhinitis and/or asthma

Allergic to house dust mites, grass pollens, molds, cat, dog, feathers, and cockroach and/or asthma

No medical problems, no smoking, no complicated pregnancies, no seafood allergy; normal diet did not exceed two meals of fish per week

Fish-oil supplement

20 weeks of pregnancy until delivery

Dunstan et al., 2003b

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=83)

Atopic women

Booked for delivery at St. John of God Hospital

Subiaco, Western Australia

Physician-diagnosed allergic rhinitis and/or asthma

Allergic to house dust mites, grasses, molds, cat, dog, feathers, and cockroach and/or asthma

No medical problems, no smoking, no complicated pregnancies, no seafood allergy; normal diet did not exceed two meals of fish per week; no preterm deliveries

Fish-oil supplement

20 weeks of pregnancy until delivery

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Fish oil group:

Four 1 g fish oil capsules/day

3.7 g of n-3 PUFA

56.0% as DHA and 27.7% as EPA

Placebo group:

Four 1 g olive oil capsules/day

66.6% n-9 oleic acid and <1.0% n-3 PUFA

Neonatal in vitro IL-10 response to cat allergen was significantly lower in the fish oil group than in the placebo group (p=0.046).

At birth, no significant differences were found in the neonates’ cytokine response to allergens and mitogens in the two groups at birth.

IFN-γ responses to OVA were detected more frequently in the control group than in the fish oil group (p=0.009).

There were no significant differences found in the frequency of detectable IL-5, IL-10, or IL-13 responses between the two groups.

“The detection of a lymphoproliferative response to allergens also tended to be lower in the fish oil group compared with the control group,” although this difference was not always significant (OR=4.48, 95% CI 0.87-23.07 for response to OVA allergen and OR=2.02, 95% CI 0.69-5.88 for response to cat).

B

Fish oil group:

Four 1 g fish oil capsules/day

3.7 g of n-3 PUFA

56.0% as DHA and 27.7% as EPA

Placebo group:

Four 1 g olive oil capsules/day

66.6% n-9 oleic acid and <1.0% n-3 PUFA

IL-13 levels were significantly lower (p=0.025) in neonates whose mothers received fish-oil supplements in pregnancy compared to the placebo group.

There were no significant differences in IFN-γ levels in cord plasmas or in IgE in plasma between the two groups.

There were no significant differences in the frequency of lymphocyte subsets for total T cells, T helper cells, T suppressor cells, NK cells, and B cells between the two groups.

After adjusting for parity, gender, and delivery method, there were significant associations between cord plasma IL-13 levels and neonatal red cell membrane DHA levels (β=−0.25, 95% CI −0.49 to −0.01) and total n-3 fatty acid levels (β=−2.70, 95% CI −5.35 to −0.05).

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Hawkes et al., 2002

Randomized Controlled Trial

Women (n=120)

Aged 20-42 years, mean about 30 years

Delivered full-term singleton infants, intended to breast-feed ≥12 weeks

Adelaide, South Australia

No known history of inflammatory disorders, not currently taking anti-inflammatory medication or fish-oil supplements

Excluded women who had ceased lactating by 4 weeks postpartum

DHA supplement

Day 3-week 12 postpartum

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Asked to limit fish and seafood intake to a maximum of 1 meal/week

Placebo:

500 mg placebo oil

Low-DHA capsule group:

70 mg EPA/day, 300 mg DHA/day

High-DHA capsule group:

140 mg EPA/day, 600 mg DHA/day

“There was no significant difference between the dietary groups in mean rank concentrations of IL-6 or TNF-α in the aqueous phase of milk” at 4 weeks postpartum.

“There was no significant difference in mean rank concentrations between the dietary groups for any of the cytokines produced by cells isolated from human milk or peripheral blood after in vitro stimulation with lipopolysaccharide or in the absence of stimulation” at 4 weeks postpartum.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Hodge et al., 1998

Randomized Controlled Trial

Boys and girls (n=39)

Aged 8-12 years

Sydney, Australia

Asthmatic with a history of episodic wheeze in the last 12 months, AHR to histamine

Omega-3 diet and omega-6 diet

6 months

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Omega-3 diet group:

Canola oil and canola-based margarines and salad dressings to replace usual oils and margarines

Supplement capsules = 0.18 g EPA and 0.12 g DHA/capsule

4 capsules/day = 1.20 g omega-3/day

Omega-6 diet group:

Sunflower oil and sunflower oil-based margarines and salad dressings to replace usual oils and margarines

Supplement capsules = 0.45 g safflower oil, 0.45 g palm oil, 0.10 g olive oil/capsule

No EPA or DHA

“There was no significant change in spirometric function, dose-response ratio to histamine or asthma severity score at either 3 or 6 months in either group.”

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Newson et al., 2004

Cohort

Children (n=1238 with cord blood fatty acid data and eczema at 18 to 30 months data; n=2945 with maternal blood fatty acid data and eczema data; n=2764 with maternal blood fatty acid data and wheezing data)

Bristol, England

Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)

Cord blood and maternal blood red cell fatty acid analysis

20 weeks of pregnancy and at delivery

*B = Evidence of a benefit; N = Evidence of no association or no clear association.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Cord blood (percentages of total red blood cell membrane phospholipid):

Medians: 0.02 ALA, 0.11 EPA, 0.22 DPA, 2.00 DHA, 4.65 LA, and 7.80 AA

Maternal blood (percentages of total red blood cell membrane phospholipid):

Medians: 0.14 ALA, 0.23 EPA, 0.60 DPA, 2.02 DHA, 11.46 LA, and 5.88 AA

After controlling for sex, gestational age at birth, birth weight, mother’s age, education level, housing tenure, parity, ethnicity, smoking in pregnancy, maternal atopic disease, child’s head circumference at birth, child’s crown to heel length at birth, mother’s BMI, breastfeeding in first 6 months, and day care use in first 6 months:

All associations between fatty acid exposure (based on cord blood levels and maternal blood levels) and eczema at 18 to 30 months were found to be nonsignificant;

All associations between fatty acid exposure (based on both cord blood levels and maternal blood levels) and wheezing at 30 to 42 months of age were found to be nonsignificant;

LA:ALA levels in cord blood were significantly associated with later-onset wheeze (OR=1.30, 95% CI 1.04-1.61), as was the ratio of ALA:sum of n-3 products (OR=0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99); and

No other significant associations were found between fatty acid exposure and transient infant wheeze, later-onset wheeze, or persistent wheeze.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

TABLE B-1f Studies on Visual Acuity: Effects on Infants Supplemented with Omega-3 Fatty Acids in Formula

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Simmer, 2005

Cochrane Review

9 Randomized Controlled Trials

LCPUFA-supplemented formula

 

Gibson et al., 2001

Review

Randomized Controlled Trials (11 on preterm and 10 on term infants)

Involving healthy preterm infants fed preterm formula

Involving healthy term infants fed formulas from near birth

Systematic literature review

DHA-supplemented formula

 

Uauy et al., 2001

Review

Summary of Randomized Controlled Trials on preterm and term infants

LCPUFA-supplemented formula

 

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

 

“There is little evidence from randomized trials of LCPUFA supplementation to support the hypothesis that LCPUFA supplementation confers a benefit for visual or general development of term infants.”

“Minor effects on VEP acuity have been suggested, but appear unlikely when all studies are reviewed.”

N

 

“Benefits of adding DHA to formulas (with or without AA) on VEP acuity have been reported in some studies, whereas other studies have failed to detect a benefit of LC-PUFA supplementation.”

B

 

There is evidence supporting “the view that dietary essential fatty acid supply affects visual development of preterm and term infants.”

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

SanGiovanni et al., 2000a

Meta-analysis

Studies done in industrialized countries

Healthy, term infants

Randomized studies:

DHA supplemented (n=114)

DHA-free (n=87)

Nonrandomized studies:

Milk-fed/behavioral-based (n=117 at 2 months; n=148 at 4 months)

Milk-fed/electrophysiological tasks (n=146 at 4 months)

DHA-free/behavioral-based (n=174 at 2 months; n=113 at 4 months)

DHA-free/electrophysiological tasks (n=108 at 4 months)

All study designs:

DHA-supplemented/behavioral-based at 2 months (n=219)

DHA-supplemented/electrophysiological tasks at 4 months (n=265)

DHA-free/behavioral-based at 2 months (n=86)

DHA-free/electrophysiological tasks at 4 months (n=109)

DHA-supplemented formula

 

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

 

Based on behavioral tests of visual acuity, the randomized studies showed a significant difference in the estimates for those fed DHA-supplemented formula vs. those fed unsupplemented formula at 2 months of age (p≤0.0005). This difference was not significant at any other age presented.

Based on behavioral tests of visual acuity, the non-randomized studies showed a significant difference in the estimates for those fed human milk vs. those fed unsupplemented formula at 2 months of age (p≤0.0005) and 4 months of age (p≤0.05). This difference was not significant at any other age presented.

Based on electrophysiological tests of visual acuity, the randomized studies showed a significant difference in the estimates for those fed (DHA-supplemented) formula vs. those fed unsupplemented formula at 7 months of age (p≤0.05). This difference was not significant at any other age presented.

Based on electrophysiological tests of visual acuity, the nonrandomized studies showed a significant difference in the estimates for those fed human milk vs. those fed unsupplemented formula at 4 months of age (p≤0.0005), 5 months of age (p≤0.05), and 7 months of age (p≤0.05). This difference was not significant at any other age presented.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

SanGiovanni et al., 2000b

Meta-analysis

5 original papers (4 prospective trials)

4 review chapters

Preterm infants

Randomized studies:

DHA-supplemented/behavioral-based (n=48 at 2 months; n=70 at 4 months)

DHA-supplemented/VEP at 4 months (n=13)

DHA-free/behavioral-based (n=49 at 2 months; n=56 at 4 months)

DHA-free/VEP at 4 months (n=28)

All study designs:

DHA-supplemented/behavioral-based at 4 months (n=80)

DHA-supplemented/VEP at 4 months (n=37)

DHA-free/behavioral-based at 4 months (n=87)

DHA-free/VEP at 4 months (n=43)

DHA-supplemented formula

 

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

 

Based on behavioral tests of visual acuity, the randomized comparisons (between those fed DHA-supplemented formula and those fed unsupplemented formula) showed significant differences at 2 and 4 months of age (p≤0.001). This difference was not significant at any other age presented.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Hoffman et al., 2003

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=61)

Healthy, term, singleton infants

Birth weight appropriate for gestational age

Breast-fed to 4-6 months

North Dallas area, TX

95% White

No family history of milk protein allergy; genetic or familial eye disease; vegetarian or vegan maternal dietary patterns; maternal metabolic disease, anemia, or infection; presence of a congenital malformation or infection; jaundice; perinatal asphyxia; meconium aspiration; or any perinatal event that resulted in placement in the neonatal intensive care unit

AA/DHA-supplemented formula

Enrolled at 6.5 weeks of age until 12 months of age (during time of weaning)

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Commercial formula (Enfamil with iron) or commercial formula supplemented with 0.36% of total fatty acids as DHA and 0.72% as AA

There were no significant differences in VEP acuity before weaning in the two groups, but at 12 months the supplemented group had significantly better VEP acuity than infants in the commercial formula group (p<0.0005).

There was a trend of better stereoacuity in the supplemented group compared to the commercial group at 9 months (p=0.12) and 12 months (p=0.13).

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Birch et al., 2002

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=65)

Healthy, term, singleton births

Birth weight appropriate for gestational age

Weaned from breastfeeding at 6 weeks of age

Dallas area, TX

Mean maternal age about 30 years

75-78% White

Majority of mothers with at least a college degree

No family history of milk protein allergy; genetic or familial eye disease; vegetarian or vegan maternal dietary patterns; maternal metabolic disease, anemia, or infection; presence of a congenital malformation or infection; jaundice; perinatal asphyxia; meconium aspiration; or any perinatal event that resulted in placement in the neonatal intensive care unit

AA/DHA-supplemented formula

6 weeks of age to 52 weeks of age

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Commercial formula (Enfamil with iron) or commercial formula supplemented with 0.36% of total fatty acids as DHA and 0.72% as AA

There were no significant differences in VEP acuity at age 6 weeks between the two groups.

The control group had significantly poorer visual acuity at week 17 (p<0.003), week 26 (p<0.001), and week 52 (p<0.001) compared to the supplemented group.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Innis et al., 2002

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=194)

Premature

Healthy, very low birth weight infants (846-1560 g), formula-fed

Multi-center study (16 neonatal centers in North America)

Not small for gestational age or >24 days postnatal age when full enteral feeds ≥375 kJ/kg/day were achieved

No necrotizing enterocolitis or other gastrointestinal disease, impaired visual or ocular status, or a history of underlying disease or congenital malformation that could interfere with growth

Reference group = term infants whose mothers anticipated breastfeeding for at least 4 months

AA/DHA-supplemented formula

Preterm formulas: At least 28 days after enteral intake of 375 kJ/kg/day reached

Term formulas: After hospital discharge until 57 weeks of age

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Preterm formula 1 = Control formula (no AA or DHA)

Preterm formula 2 = DHA formula (0.34% fatty acids as DHA)

Preterm formula 3 = DHA+AA formula (0.33% fatty acids as DHA, 0.60% fatty acids as AA)

Term formula = no AA or DHA

Breast-fed term infants = no solid foods during the study unless otherwise instructed by their physicians

At 57 weeks, visual acuity of the breast-fed term infants was significantly higher than in the premature infants, but not at 48 weeks; at 48 or 57 weeks, visual acuity was not significantly different among the premature infant groups.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Van Wezel-Meijler et al., 2002

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=42)

Preterm, admitted to neonatal intensive- or high-care unit of hospital

Birth weight <1750 g

Leiden, Netherlands

Mothers not breast-feeding

Normal neurological examination throughout the neonatal period

Repeated ultrasound of the brain being normal or showing, at most, minor abnormalities

No abnormalities of the central nervous system; abnormal neurological examination or occurrence of seizures; any systemic disease with potential negative influence on future growth or development; serious nutritional or gastrointestinal problems preventing initiation of enteral feeding after the first week postpartum or complete enteral feeding after the third week postpartum; retinopathy of prematurity grade 3 or more

AA/DHA-supplemented formula

2-3 weeks after birth until weighing 3000 g

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Supplemented preterm formula:

4.4 g fat/100 mL

0.015 g/100 mL of added DHA (microalgae)

0.031 g/100 mL of added AA (fungi)

Control formula:

4.4 g fat/100 mL

No addition of AA and DHA

There were no significant differences found in Flash VEP at 3 and 12 months between the two groups.

There were no significant differences found in visual acuity at 3, 6, 12, or 24 months between the two groups.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Makrides et al., 2000

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=73 in formula groups; n=63 in breastfed group)

White

Full-term and appropriate weight for gestational age

Mean mothers’ education was mid-secondary school level for formula-fed infants and completion of secondary school for breastfed infants

No congenital disease or complications during pregnancy

AA/DHA-supplemented formula

Age at entry not specified, up to 34 weeks of age

Bougle et al., 1999

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=40)

Mean age about 33 weeks

Enrolled the 2nd day of enteral feeding

Healthy, appropriate weight for gestational age

Premature

Free of respiratory, metabolic or neurological disease; malformations; infections; intrauterine asphyxia

Fed by digestive route within the first 7 days of life

LCPUFA-supplemented formula

Within the first 2 days of enteral feeding, then for 30 days

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Placebo formula (% total fatty acids):

16.8% LA, 1.5% ALA

DHA formula (% total fatty acids):

16.80% LA, 1.20% ALA, 0.10% EPA, 0.35% DHA

DHA+AA formula (% total fatty acids):

16.60% LA, 0.34% AA, 1.00% ALA, 0.34% DHA

Breast milk (% total fatty acids, mean±SE):

13.40±2.90% LA, 0.39±0.07% AA, 0.95±0.32% ALA, 0.09±0.03% EPA, 0.20±0.07% DHA

After adjusting for gender, postconceptional age, birth weight, and maternal smoking, there were no significant differences in VEP between any of the groups at 16 or 34 weeks of age.

N

Breast milk (% total fatty acids, mean±SE):

14.1±2.0% LA, 0.4±0.2% GLA, 0.9±0.2% AA, 0.5±0.1% ALA, 0.5±0.1% DHA

Formula A (% total fatty acids):

14.1% LA, 1.3% ALA

Formula B (% total fatty acids):

17.7% LA, 0.4% GLA, 0.1% AA, 1.2% ALA, 0.1% EPA, 0.6% DHA

There were no significant differences between the groups based on electrophysiological data, except that the maturation of the motor nerve conduction was significantly slower in the Formula B group than in the breast milk group and the Formula A group (p<0.05).

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Carlson et al., 1999

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=119)

AA/DHA-supplemented formula

<8 days of age until about 12 months of age

Infants fed supplemented formula near birth received commercial formula from term less 3 months until 12 months of age; infants fed supplemented formula near term received commercial formula from term less 3 months to term less 1 month, and then supplemented formula until 12 months of age

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Commercially available standard formula contained no EPA or DHA

Supplemented formula 0.13% DHA and 0.40% AA from egg phospholipids

Compared to the infants not supplemented, “only those supplemented near birth had higher acuity at 2 months (p<0.02) and a trend toward higher acuity at 6 months (p<0.07).”

Infants supplemented at birth “also had higher acuity than those supplemented at term at 2 months (p<0.05).”

“First year acuity continued to increase (p<0.05) between consecutive ages until 6 months” in those supplemented at birth and 9 months in those unsupplemented and supplemented at term.

“All groups had similar acuity at 9 and 12 months.”

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Birch et al., 1998

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=108)

Healthy, term, birth weight appropriate for gestational age

Singleton births

Dallas, TX

75% White, 12% Black, 12% Hispanic, 1% other

Mean maternal age 29 years

67.6% mothers completed at least 2 years of college

No family history of milk protein allergy; genetic or familial eye disease; vegetarian or vegan maternal dietary patterns; maternal metabolic disease, anemia, or infection; presence of a congenital malformation or infection; jaundice; perinatal asphyxia; meconium aspiration; or any perinatal event that resulted in placement in the neonatal intensive care unit

AA/DHA-enriched formula

0-4 days postpartum through 17 weeks of age

Carlson et al., 1996a

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=58)

Born at term (37-43 weeks)

Birth weight 747-1275 g

Memphis, TN

Predominantly Black

No growth retardation in utero and no medical problems likely to influence long-term growth and development

Mothers education mean of about 12 years

DHA-supplemented formula

24 hours after birth; end point not specified

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Enfamil + iron

Enfamil + iron + 0.35% DHA

Enfamil + iron + 0.36% DHA + 0.72% AA

Visual acuity was significantly poorer in the control group than in the DHA or DHA+AA groups and the breast-fed group.

At 6, 17, 26, and 52 weeks the association between RBC AA and sweep VEP was not statistically significant. The association was also nonsignificant for RBC EPA.

At 6, 17, 26, and 52 weeks, the association between RBC DHA was significantly associated with lower sweep VEP (p<0.001, p=0.01, p=0.05, p<0.001, respectively).

At 6, 17, and 52 weeks, the association between RBC n-3:n-6 was significantly associated with lower sweep VEP (p<0.001, p=0.03, p<0.001, respectively); the association was not statistically significant at 26 weeks.

B

Formula with AA+DHA = 2 g AA/100 g total fatty acids; 0.1 g DHA/100 g total fatty acids

Formula without DHA = 2.2 g ALA/100 g total fatty acids

“Term infants fed formulas with added AA and DHA had higher grating acuity at 2 months of age but not at 4, 6, 9, or 12 months of age compared with infants fed an unsupplemented formula.”

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Carlson et al., 1996b

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=59)

Memphis, TN

Maternal mean age about 22.5 year

No intraventricular or periventricular hemorrhage > grade 2; a history of maternal cocaine or alcohol abuse; congenital anomalies likely to affect long-term growth and development; or intrauterine growth retardation

Full enteral feeding of 418 kJ/kg/day by 6 weeks of age and tolerated enteral feeding thereafter

EPA/DHA-supplemented formula (marine oil)

Between 3-5 days postpartum until 2 months from expected term of 48±1 week post-menstrual age

Carlson et al., 1993

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=67)

Birth weight 748-1398 g

Mean gestational age 29 weeks

Memphis, TN

Did not require mechanical ventilation; have intraventricular hemorrhage > grade 2; have retinopathy of prematurity > stage 2; require surgical intervention for necrotizing enterocolitis; have severe intrauterine growth retardation; or a history of maternal substance abuse

Predominantly Black and from lower socioeconomic groups

Maternal age about 23 years

EPA/DHA-supplemented formula (marine oil)

Preterm formula from when infant tolerated enteral intakes >462 kJ/kg body weight/day for 5-7 days (≈3 weeks of age) until discharge

Term formula from discharge until 9 months

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Standard preterm formula = LA at 2.5% of total fatty acid

Marine-oil supplemented formula = 0.20% DHA and 0.06% EPA of total fatty acids

“Visual acuity improved significantly between successive ages of 0 and 2 months, 2 and 4 months … Between 6 and 12 months visual acuity plateaued.”

B

Commercially available standard formula contained no EPA or DHA

Marine-oil supplemented formula contained 0.2% DHA and 0.3% EPA of total fatty acids

Visual acuity development was significantly higher in the marine-oil group compared to the control group at 2 months (p<0.014) and 4 months (p<0.002).

There were no significant differences found at the other ages reported.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Birch et al., 1992

Randomized Controlled Trial

Male infants (n=32)

Female infants (n=41)

Born 27-33 weeks gestation

Birth weight 1000-1500 g

No respirator treatment for more than 7 days or congenital infections; gross congenital malformations; retinopathy of prematurity; or grade III or IV intracranial hemorrhages

EPA/DHA-supplemented formula (soy/ marine oil)

10 days of age until 6 months of age

Lauritzen et al., 2001

Review

Summary of the literature (animal, observational, RCTs)

DHA-supplemented formula

 

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Soy/marine oil-supplemented formula (preterm/follow-up formula, g/100 g lipids):

LA = 20.4/18.1

ALA = 1.4/1.4

EPA+DHA = 1.0/0.9

Corn oil-based formula (preterm/follow-up formula, g/100 g lipids):

LA = 24.2/21.1

ALA = 0.5/0.5

EPA+DHA = 0.0/0.0

Soy oil-based formula (preterm/follow-up formula, g/100 g lipids):

LA = 20.8/20.3

ALA = 2.7/2.8

EPA+DHA = 0.0/0.1

There were significant differences in VEP acuity for the different formula groups (p<0.025), with the corn oil group having poorer VEP acuity than the soy/marine oil group (p<0.05) at 36 weeks.

The corn oil group (p<0.05) and the soy oil group (p<0.05) had significantly poorer VEP acuity than the soy/marine oil group at 57 weeks.

B

 

“Observational studies in general show better retinal function in breast-fed infants than in infants fed formula without DHA, but approximately half of the intervention studies show no effect.”

Animal studies do offer evidence that DHA plays a role in retinal function, but these results cannot easily be extrapolated to humans.

4 RCTs with “preterm infants have all shown a positive effect of dietary DHA on visual development;” the results from term infants are not as conclusive.

More data is needed to see if the “variation in DHA content of human milk has a functional effect.”

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Williams et al., 2001

Cohort

Boys and girls (n=435)

Mean age of 3.5 years

Born in last 6 months of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) enrollment period

Healthy term infants

Seafood (mother) and breast milk (child)

Seafood = during pregnancy (mother)

Breast milk = until 4 months of age (child)

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Oily fish consumption categories:

1 = Never or rarely

2 = Once every 2 weeks

3 = More than once every 2 weeks

White fish = cod, haddock, plaice, and “fish fingers”

Oily fish = pilchards, sardines, mackerel, tuna, herring, kippers, trout, and salmon

After adjusting for breast-feeding, sex, maternal education, maternal age, housing tenure, financial difficulties, maternal smoking, number of older siblings in household, child care, maternal job status, mother being vegetarian, mother’s fish-eating habits:

“Mothers who ate oily fish at least once every 2 weeks during pregnancy were more likely to have children who achieved foveal stereoacuity than were the mothers who never ate oily fish (OR=1.57, 95% CI 1.00-2.45),” but this was not significant; and

“The results of this study suggest that for full-term infants, breast-feeding is associated with enhanced stereopsis at age 3.5 years, as is a maternal DHA-rich antenatal diet, irrespective of later infant feeding practice.”

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Carlson et al., 1986

Cohort

Infants (n=27)

Born on or before 32 weeks gestation (range 24-32 weeks)

University of Mississippi Medical Center

Weighed <1500 g at birth and were on full feedings of at least 60 kcal/kg without intravenous supplementation

Free of major congenital malformations and did not have any ongoing major disease process

Discharged at about 1800 g

Human milk and milk formula

Delivery to an average of 7 weeks later

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Expressed, previously frozen milk produced by their own mothers or formula

Infants fed formula started with enteral feeding with Portagen and then Enfamil Premature and Similac Special Care as tolerated. Those followed after discharge were fed term formulas also produced by Enfamil and Similac

Human milk (in mol%, mean±SE):

LA = 16.00±1.30, AA = 0.59±0.04, ALA = 0.62±0.04, EPA = 0.03±0.00, DPA = 0.09±0.03, DHA = 0.19±0.03

Portagen (in mol%, mean±SE):

LA = 8.1, AA = None, ALA = Trace, EPA = None, DPA = None, DHA = None

Enfamil Premature (in mol%, mean±SE):

LA = 22.4, AA = None, ALA = 0.6, EPA = None, DPA = None, DHA = None

Similac Special Care (in mol%, mean±SE):

LA = 17.4, AA = None, ALA = 0.9, EPA = None, DPA = None, DHA = None

Based on phosphatidylethanolamine composition of fatty acids (in mol%): EPA was significantly lower (p<0.005) in those breast-fed after the feedings than in the pre-study samples; LA and DPA were significantly higher (p<0.001) and DHA was significantly lower (p<0.005) in those breast-fed after the feedings than in the preterm cord blood; LA was significantly higher (p<0.005) and EPA was significantly lower (p<0.005) in those formula-fed after the feedings than in the pre-study samples; LA was significantly higher (p<0.005) and DHA was significantly lower (p<0.001) in those formula-fed compared to those breast-fed; LA (p<0.005) and DPA (p<0.001) were significantly higher and AA (p<0.005) and DHA (p<0.001) were significantly lower in those formula-fed after the feedings than in the preterm cord blood; LA was significantly higher (p<0.005) and EPA was significantly lower (p<0.005) in those formula-fed after the feedings than in the pre-study samples.

Based on phosphatidylcholine composition of fatty acids (in mol%): LA was significantly higher (p<0.005) in those breast-fed after the feedings than in the pre-study samples; LA was significantly higher (p<0.005) and AA (p<0.001) and DHA (p<0.005) were significantly lower in those breast-fed after the feedings than in the preterm cord blood; LA was significantly higher (p<0.001) and AA was significantly lower (p<0.001) in those formula-fed after the feedings than in the pre-study samples; LA was significantly higher (p<0.005) and AA and DHA were significantly lower (p<0.001) in those formula-fed compared to those breast-fed; LA was significantly higher (p<0.005) and AA and DHA were significantly lower (p<0.001) in those formula-fed after the feedings than in the preterm cord blood.

Based on phosphatidylserine composition of fatty acids (in mol%): LA and DHA were significantly higher (p<0.005) in those breast-fed after the feedings than in the preterm cord blood; AA was significantly lower (p<0.005) in those breast-fed after the feedings than in the pre-study samples; LA and DHA were significantly higher (p<0.005) in those formula-fed after the feedings than in the pre-study samples; AA was significantly lower (p<0.005) and DHA was significantly higher (p<0.025) in those formula-fed after the feedings than in the pre-study samples.

N/A

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Putnam et al., 1982

Cohort

Infants (n=40)

Enrolled at birth

Well-baby clinic at the University of South Florida Medical Clinics

At least 90% of energy from human milk or formula before sample collection

Human milk and milk formula

3 weeks of age to 6 months of age

Breast milk collected at 8 weeks and infants’ blood drawn between 4.5 and 6 months of age

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Mothers were encouraged to follow the recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition (food other than human milk or humanized formula be omitted from infant’s diet until he/she was 4-6 months of age)

Human milk (% of total, mean):

15.80±0.61 LA, 0.60±0.03 AA, 0.80±0.09 ALA, 0.10±0.03 EPA, 0.10±0.01 DPA, 0.10±0.01 DHA

Enfamil + iron (% of total, mean):

45.1 LA, No AA, 5.0 ALA, No EPA, No DPA, No DHA

SMA formula (% of total, mean):

14.0 LA, No AA, 1.2 ALA, No EPA, No DPA, No DHA

“Human milk-fed infants had lower concentrations of membrane LA than SMA-fed infants despite the equivalent relative intakes of dietary LA.”

“These diets did not influence the relative contributions of PE, PC, Sp, and PS to erythrocyte membrane phospholipid nor did they influence the lipid phosphorous/cholesterol ratio.”

Significant differences in fatty acid composition of infant erythrocyte ethanolamine are as follows (weight % of total fatty acid methyl esters):

Infants fed human milk had significantly higher AA (p<0.05), DPA (p<0.05), and DHA (p<0.001) than those fed SMA formula; and

Infants fed human milk had significantly higher AA (p<0.01) and significantly lower LA (p<0.001), ALA (p<0.001), EPA (p<0.05), and DHA (p<0.001) than those fed Enfamil formula with iron.

N/A

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Sanders and Naismith, 1979

Cross-sectional

Infants (n=18)

Aged 14 weeks

Fed from birth a modified cow’s milk formula or had been breast-fed

Participated in an earlier study

Human milk and milk formula

14 weeks of age

Neuringer et al., 1984

Animal

Adult female rhesus monkeys

Diet deficient in n-3 fatty acids

2 months before conception and throughout pregnancy

*N = Evidence of no association or no clear association; B = Evidence of a benefit; N/A = A conclusion is not available; these data are presented for background information only.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Breast milk (% total fatty acids, mean±SE):

LA = 6.90±0.81, ALA = 0.80±0.05, EPA = 0.20±0.08, DPA = 0.52±0.27, DHA = 0.59±0.23

Milk formula (% total fatty acids, mean):

LA = 1.60, ALA = 0.70, EPA = 0.08, DPA = 0.11, DHA = 0.02

LA, AA, DHA are significantly lower in the formula-fed infants than in the breast-fed infants (p<0.01, p<0.05, p<0.01, respectively).

EPA and DPA are significantly higher in the formula-fed infants than in the breast-fed infants (p<0.05).

“The minimum requirement of the young infant for LA is substantially less than 1% of the dietary energy, the value most widely quoted.”

N/A

Experimental group:

Semipurified diet deficient in n-3 fatty acids

Safflower oil sole fat source

76.0% LA, 0.3% GLA, 0.2% DGLA, 0.3% ALA, 225.0% n-6:n-3 of total fatty acids

Control group:

Soy bean oil sole fat source

53.1% LA, 0.0% GLA, 0.3% DGLA, 7.7% ALA, 7.0% n-6:n-3 of total fatty acids

AA and total n-6 fatty acids were significantly higher in the experimental group infants compared to the control group infants (p<0.005).

ALA, EPA, DPA, DHA and total n-3 fatty acids are all significantly lower in the experimental group infants compared to the control group infants (p<0.001).

At 4, 8, and 12 weeks, the visual acuity threshold in the experimental group was significantly lower than in the control group (p<0.05, p<0.0005, p<0.005, respectively).

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

TABLE B-1g Studies on Cognitive and Motor Development: Effects on Infants Supplemented with Omega-3 Fatty Acids in Formula

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Cohen et al., 2005

Review

Aggregated 8 randomized controlled trials

(1 study of maternal dietary supplementation and 7 studies of formula supplementation)

n-3 supplement

 

Simmer and Patole, 2005

Cochrane Review

11 randomized controlled trials

LCPUFA-supplemented formula

 

Simmer, 2005

Cochrane Review

9 randomized controlled trials

LCPUFA-supplemented formula

 

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

 

An increase in maternal intake of DHA during pregnancy of 1 g/day will increase child IQ by 0.8-1.8 points.

“Prenatal maternal DHA intake increasing the child plasma (RBC) DHA phospholipid fraction by 1% has the same impact on cognitive development as formula DHA supplementation that increases the child’s plasma (RBC) DHA phospholipid fraction by 1%.”

“Because typical DHA intake associated with fish consumption is well under 1 g/day, changes in fish consumption will result in IQ effects amounting to a fraction of a point,” but they are not clinically detectable.

B

 

“No long-term benefits were demonstrated for infants receiving formula supplemented with LCPUFA. There was no evidence that supplementation of formula with n-3 and n-6 LCPUFA impaired the growth of preterm infants.”

N

 

“There is little evidence from randomized trials of LCPUFA supplementation to support the hypothesis that LCPUFA supplementation confers a benefit for visual or general development of term infants.”

“Minor effects on VEP acuity have been suggested, but appear unlikely when all studies are reviewed.”

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Gibson et al., 2001

Review

Randomized controlled trials (11 on preterm and 10 on term infants)

Involving healthy preterm infants fed preterm formula

Involving healthy term infants fed formulas from near birth

Systematic literature review

LCPUFA-supplemented formula

 

Uauy et al., 2001

Review

Summary of randomized controlled trials on preterm and term infants

AA/DHA-supplemented formula

 

Carlson and Neuringer, 1999

Review

Summary of animal studies and randomized controlled trials

Based on a session from the AOCS 1996 meeting: PUFA in Infant Nutrition: Consensus and Controversies

Neural DHA accumulation

 

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

 

“Although there are still some concerns on safety issues regarding the addition of LCPUFA to preterm infant formula, the evidence in support of a beneficial effect of such supplementation on visual function is relatively compelling.”

“It seems that the possible negative effects of n-3 LCPUFA on growth of preterm infants have been overcome through improved study design and/or the addition of a balance of n-6 and n-3 LCPUFA.”

“There is also mixed evidence for the support of an effect of dietary LCPUFA on more global measures of development (Bayley’s Scales of Infant Development or Brunet-Lezine test).”

B

 

“Evidence for a beneficial effect of AA+DHA supplementation on CNS development is strong.”

“The preliminary information on cognitive development is insufficient to fully establish a relationship between LCPUFA and mental development.”

B

 

Studies in deficient monkeys suggest that “lower brain accumulation of DHA may influence neural domains such as sensation, motivation or temperament, but not cognition.”

“The most consistent effect identified to date in human and animal studies has been that of look duration and tests of visual attention.”

“A limited number of behavioral studies in animals and humans address the question of neural DHA accumulation and developmental measures other than vision.”

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Bouwstra et al., 2005

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=256 to 446, depending on assessment)

Term, healthy

Groningen, Netherlands

University and Martini Hospitals in Groningen and at midwife clinics

No congenital disorders that interfered with adequate functioning in daily life; infants from multiple births; infants whose mothers did not have mastery of the Dutch language or suffered from significant illness or disability; adopted or foster infants; or formula-fed infants who had received human milk >5 days

LCPUFA-supplemented formula

Birth to 2 months of age

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Control formula (in mol%):

11.56 LA, 1.27 ALA

Supplemented formula (in mol%):

11.00 LA, 0.18 GLA, 0.03 DGLA, 0.39 AA, 1.30 ALA, 0.06 EPA, 0.23 DHA

Breastfed (in mol%, mean±SE):

13.62±4.24 LA, 0.11±0.03 GLA, 0.34±0.06 DGLA, 0.34±0.06 AA, 1.11±0.35 ALA, 0.06±0.04 EPA, 0.19±0.11 DHA

“The groups did not show statistically significant differences in clinical neurological condition, neurological optimality score, fluency score, and the psychomotor and mental development indices at 18 months.”

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Clandinin et al., 2005

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=361)

Preterm

Multi-site study

First phase:

Gestational age ≤35 weeks postmenstrual age

<10 total days of enteral feeding of >30 mL/kg/day

No congenital abnormalities of the gastrointestinal tract, hepatitis, hepatic or biliary pathology, necrotizing enterocolitis confirmed before enrollment, or history of underlying disease or congenital malformations likely to interfere with evaluation

Second phase:

Successful completion of the first phase, ≥80% of enteral intake from study formula during hospitalization, and 100% caloric intake from study formula at completion of the first phase

Algal-DHA- and fish-DHA-supplemented formulas, human milk

Premature formula: ≥14 days of age until at/near hospital discharge (40 weeks of age)

Discharge formula: 40 weeks until 53 weeks post-menstrual age

Term formula: 53 weeks until 92 weeks post-menstrual age

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Control formula:

No DHA or AA

Algal-DHA formula:

17 mg DHA/100 kcal from algal oil, 34 mg AA/100 kcal from fungal oil

0.3% fatty acids from DHA, 0.6% fatty acids from AA

Fish-DHA formula:

17 mg DHA/100 kcal from tuna fish oil, 34 mg AA/100 kcal from fungal oil

0.3% fatty acids from DHA, 0.6% fatty acids from AA

Worldwide human milk:

0.3% DHA and 0.6% AA (weight of fatty acids)

At 118 weeks, breast-fed term infants had significantly higher MDI and PDI scores compared to the control formula group, the algal-DHA formula group, and the fish-DHA formula group (p<0.05).

At 118 weeks, the algal-DHA formula group had a higher MDI score (p=0.056), although it was not significant, and a significantly higher PDI score (p<0.05) compared to the control formula group.

At 118 weeks, the fish-DHA formula group had significantly higher MDI and PDI scores (p<0.05) compared to the control formula group.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Jensen et al., 2005

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=227)

Aged 18-40 years

Houston, TX

White (75% DHA group; 79% control group)

African American (19% DHA group; 13% control group)

Women plan to breastfeed exclusively for ≥4 months

Infant gestational age >37 weeks

Infant birth weight 2500-4200 g

No chronic maternal disorders; major congenital anomalies and obvious gastrointestinal or metabolic disorders of the infant

DHA supplement

Within 5 days after delivery until 4 months postpartum

Fewtrell et al., 2004

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=238)

Preterm

Glasgow, UK

Birth weight ≤2000 g

Mean maternal age about 29 years

Social class 1 or 2 (18% in controls; 27% in LCPUFA group)

Mothers with degree or higher (2% in controls; 7% in LCPUFA group)

LCPUFA-supplemented formula

Preterm formulas: when pediatrician decided that preterm formula should be started, to discharge

Discharge formulas: from discharge until 9 months after term

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

High-DHA capsule (algal triacylglycerol):

0.8% LA and 41.7% DHA by weight

200 mg DHA/day

Control capsule (soy and corn oil):

56.3% LA, 3.9% ALA by weight

There were no significant differences in visual acuity from the Teller Acuity Card at 4 or 8 months of age or from the Sweep VEP at 4 months of age between the two groups.

There were no significant differences in mean transient VEP latency at 4 and 8 months of age between the two groups; but the transient VEP amplitude was significantly lower in the infants of the high-DHA capsule group compared to the infants of the control capsule group (p<0.03).

There were no significant differences in Gesell Gross Motor, CAT, or CLAMS DQ scores at 12 and 30 months of age or in Bayley MDI at 30 months of age between the two groups; but Bayley PDI at 30 months of age was 8.4 points higher in infants of the high-DHA capsule group compared to infants of the control capsule group.

N

LCPUFA-supplemented formulas (g/100 g fat):

12.30 LA, 0.04 AA, 1.50 ALA, 0.10 EPA, 0.50 DHA

Control formulas (g/100 g fat):

11.5 LA, 1.6 ALA, no AA, EPA, or DHA

At 18 months of age, the Bayley MDI and PDI scores did not differ significantly between the groups.

At 9 months of age, overall development scores and individual subscale scores did not differ significantly between the groups.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Bouwstra et al., 2003

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=397)

Term, healthy

Groningen, Netherlands

University and Martini Hospitals in Groningen and at midwife clinics

No congenital disorders that interfered with adequate functioning in daily life; infants from multiple births; infants whose mothers did not have mastery of the Dutch language or suffered from significant illness or disability; adopted or foster infants; or formula-fed infants who had received human milk >5 days

LCPUFA-supplemented formula

Birth to 2 months of age

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Control formula (in mol%):

11.56 LA, 1.27 ALA

Supplemented formula (in mol%):

11.00 LA, 0.18 GLA, 0.03 DGLA, 0.39 AA, 1.30 ALA, 0.06 EPA, 0.23 DHA

Breast-fed (in mol%, mean±SE):

13.62±4.24 LA, 0.11±0.03 GLA, 0.34±0.06 DGLA, 0.34±0.06 AA, 1.11±0.35 ALA, 0.06±0.04 EPA, 0.19±0.11 DHA

After controlling for profession of mother’s partner requiring a university or vocational-college education, Obstetrical Optimality Score, and age at assessment:

The control formula group had a significantly lower OR of occurrence of normal-optimal general movements at age 3 months when compared to the breastfed infants (OR=0.55; p=0.038); and

Those in the supplemented formula group had a significantly lower OR of occurrence of normal-optimal general movements at age 3 months when compared to the breast-fed infants (OR=0.42; p=0.006), but the OR was not significant when compared to the control formula group (OR=0.77; p=0.41).

After controlling for marital status, family history of diabetes, gestational age at birth, condition of perineum, and age at assessment:

The control formula group had a significantly higher OR of mildly abnormal general movements at age 3 months when compared to the breast-fed infants (OR=2.03; p=0.039); and

The supplemented formula group had a significantly lower OR of mildly abnormal general movements at age 3 months when compared to the control formula group (OR=0.49; p=0.032), but the OR was not significant when compared to the breast-fed infants (OR=0.94; p=0.87).

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Helland et al., 2003

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=48 in cod-liver oil group; n=36 in corn oil group)

Aged 19-35 years

Oslo, Norway

Healthy women with, singleton pregnancy, nulli- or primiparous, intention to breast-feed

No supplement of n-3 LCPUFA earlier during pregnancy, premature births, birth asphyxia, general infections, or anomalies in the infants that required special attention

Cod-liver oil supplement

From 18 weeks of pregnancy until 3 months after delivery

Fewtrell et al., 2002

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=195 formula-fed; n=88 breast-fed)

Preterm

Birth weight <1750 g

Nottingham and Leicester, UK

No congenital malformation known to affect neurodevelopment

Mothers decided not to breast-feed by 10 days of age; tolerated enteral feeds at that time (for randomized groups)

Social class 1 or 2 (19% in controls; 26% in LCPUFA group; 33% in breast-fed group)

LCPUFA-supplemented formula

10 days of age until discharge

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Cod-liver oil:

10 mL/day

1183 mg DHA, 803 mg EPA

Corn oil:

10 mL/day

4747 mg LA, 92 mg ALA

K-ABC scores were significantly higher for the subset MPCOMP among children from the cod-liver oil group compared to the corn oil group (p=0.049). The scores for the other subtests (SEQPROC, SIMPROC, NONVERB) were also higher in the cod-liver oil group compared to the corn oil group, but they were not significant.

B

LCPUFA-supplemented formula (g/100 g fat):

12.00 LA, 0.31 AA, 0.60 ALA, 0.04 EPA, 0.17 DHA

Control formula (g/100 g fat):

10.6 LA, 0.7 ALA, no detected AA, EPA, DHA

There were no significant differences in KPS quotients at 9 months of age and neurological status at 9 or 18 months of age between the two formula groups.

There were no significant differences found in Bayley MDI or PDI at 18 months of age between the two formula groups.

Breast-fed infants had significantly higher KPS quotients (overall, adaptive, gross motor, fine motor, and personal-social) at 9 months of age (p<0.005) and significantly higher Bayley MDI and PDI at 18 months of age (p<0.005) compared to the control formula-fed infants.

Breast-fed infants had significantly higher KPS quotients (overall, adaptive, gross motor, fine motor, and personal-social) at 9 months of age (p<0.005; p<0.05 for gross motor quotient) and significantly higher Bayley MDI and PDI at 18 months of age (p<0.005) compared to the LCPUFA-supplemented formula infants.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Van Wezel-Meijler et al., 2002

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=42)

Preterm, admitted to neonatal intensive-or high-care unit of hospital

Birth weight <1750 g

Leiden, Netherlands

Mothers not breast-feeding

Normal neurological examination throughout the neonatal period

Repeated ultrasound of the brain being normal or showing, at most, minor abnormalities

No abnormalities of the central nervous system; abnormal neurological examination or occurrence of seizures; any systemic disease with potential negative influence on future growth or development; serious nutritional or gastrointestinal problems preventing initiation of enteral feeding after the first week postpartum or complete enteral feeding after the third week postpartum; retinopathy of prematurity grade 3 or more

AA/DHA-supplemented formula

2-3 weeks after birth until weighing 3000 g

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Supplemented preterm formula:

4.4 g fat/100 mL

0.015 g/100 mL of added DHA (microalgae)

0.031 g/100 mL of added AA (fungi)

Control formula:

4.4 g fat/100 mL

No addition of DHA and AA

There were no significant differences found in Bayley MDI and PDI at 3, 6, 12, or 24 months between the two groups.

There were no significant differences found in myelination at 3 and 12 months between the two groups.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Auestad et al., 2001

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=294 formulafed; n=165 breast-fed)

Kansas City, MO; Little Rock, AR; Pittsburgh, PA; Tucson, AZ

Good health, term status, either ≤9 days of age (formula group) or ≤11 days of age and currently breast-feeding (breast-feeding group), birth weight ≥2500 g, 5-minute APGAR score ≥7, ability to tolerate milk-based formula or breast milk, guardian or parent agreement to feed the assigned study formula ad libitum according to the study design

No evidence of significant cardiac, respiratory, ophthalmologic, gastrointestinal, hematologic, or metabolic disease; milk-protein allergy; or a maternal medical history known to have proven adverse effects on the fetus, tuberculosis, HIV, perinatal infections, or substance abuse

61-74% European American

60-80% mothers married

Mean mothers’ age about 29 years

Mean mothers’ education about 14 years

Fish oil/fungal oil and egg-derived triglyceridesupplemented formulas

9-11 days after birth until 12 months of age

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Fish oil and fungal oil-supplemented preterm formula:

0.46 g AA/100 g total fatty acids

≤0.04 g EPA/100 g total fatty acids

0.13 g DHA/100 g total fatty acids

Egg-derived triglyceride-supplemented preterm formula:

0.45 g AA/100 g total fatty acids

No detected EPA

0.14 g DHA/100 g total fatty acids

Control formula:

No detected AA, EPA, DHA

The vocabulary expression score at 14 months was significantly higher in the fish/fungal group than in the egg-TG group (p<0.05).

Smiling and laughter was significantly higher in the control group than in the egg-TG group (p=0.05).

No other development, cognition, vocabulary, or temperament outcomes presented were significantly different between the formula groups.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

O’Connor et al., 2001

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=470)

Preterm

Birth weight 750-1800 g

Cleveland, OH; Kansas City, MO; Little Rock, AR; Nottingham and Leeds, UK; Louisville, KY; Portland, OR; New York, NY; Santiago, Chile

White (n=81 controls; n=80 fish/fungal; n=85 egg-TG)

No serious congenital abnormalities that could affect growth and development; major surgery before randomization; periventricular/intra-ventricular hemorrhage greater than grade II; maternal incapacity; liquid ventilation; asphyxia resulting in severe and permanent neurologic damage; or uncontrolled systemic infection at the time of enrollment

Fish oil/fungal oil and egg-derived triglyceride/fish oil-supplemented formulas

In hospital formula from within 72 hours of first enteral feeding until term-corrected age

Post-discharge formula from term-corrected age until 12 months of age

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

All in g/100 g total fatty acids (mean±SE)

In-hospital control:

16.0±0.9 LA, 2.4±0.1 ALA, no AA, EPA, DHA

In-hospital AA+DHA (fish/fungal oil):

16.80±1.00 LA, 2.60±0.30 ALA, 0.43±0.02 AA, 0.08±0.01 EPA, 0.27±0.04 DHA

In-hospital AA+DHA (egg-TG/fish oil):

17.50±0.90 LA, 2.50±0.30 ALA, 0.41±0.00 AA, no EPA, 0.24±0.01 DHA

Post-discharge control:

19.1±1.1 LA, 2.4±0.2 ALA, no AA, EPA, DHA

Post-discharge AA+DHA (fish/fungal oil):

19.50±0.70 LA, 2.40±0.20 ALA, 0.43±0.01 AA, no EPA, 0.16±0.01 DHA

Post-discharge AA+DHA (egg-TG/ fish oil):

20.30±0.40 LA, 2.40±0.20 ALA, 0.41±0.02 AA, no EPA, 0.15±0.02 DHA

The mean novelty preference of the egg-TG/fish oil formula group was significantly greater than the control group (p=0.02) and the fish/fungal formula group (p=0.003) at 6 months corrected age.

Using a Bonferroni adjusted alpha level of 0.0083, the difference between the fish/fungal formula group and the egg-TG/fish formula group was statistically significant.

“Vocabulary comprehension did not differ among the 3 study formula groups at either 9 or 14 months corrected age in either the intent-to-treat or subgroup analysis.”

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Birch et al., 2000

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=56)

Healthy, term, birth weight appropriate for gestational age

Singleton births

Dallas, TX

Predominantly White

About 65% mothers had a college or postgraduate education

No family history of milk protein allergy; genetic or familial eye disease; vegetarian or vegan maternal dietary patterns; maternal metabolic disease, anemia; or infection; presence of a congenital malformation or infection; jaundice; perinatal asphyxia; meconium aspiration; or any perinatal event that resulted in placement in the neonatal intensive care unit

AA-enriched formula

0-4 days of age to 17 weeks of age

Lucas et al., 1999

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=309 formula-fed; n=138 breast-fed)

Healthy, term, singleton pregnancies, appropriate size for gestational age

Nottingham and Leicester, UK

Mean maternal age about 27 years

93.5% married

About 70% with no higher school qualifications

LCPUFA-supplemented formula

Birth until 6 months of age

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Enfamil + iron

Enfamil + iron + 0.35% DHA

Enfamil + iron + 0.36% DHA + 0.72% AA

The mean Bayley MDI score at 18 months was significantly higher in the DHA/AA-supplemented formula group than in the control formula group (p<0.05).

The mean Bayley PDI score at 18 months was not statistically different among the three groups (p=0.13).

The mean Behavioral Rating Scale score at 18 months was not statistically different among the three groups (p=0.30).

B

LCPUFA-supplemented formula:

15.90% LA, 0.30% AA, 1.40% ALA, 0.01% EPA, 0.32% DHA

Control formula:

12.4% LA, 1.1% ALA

There were no significant differences in Bayley MDI and PDI at 18 months or in Knobloch, Passamanick, and Sherrard’s test at 9 months between the two formula groups.

There were no significant differences in stools to 6 months, crying time (minutes/day) to 6 months, or formula intake to 6 months between the two formula groups.

There were no significant differences in the OR of infection-related outcomes or the prescription of antibiotics at 9 months between the two formula groups.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Scott et al., 1998

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=274)

Healthy, full-term

Kansas, MO; Portland, OR; Seattle, WA

No prematurity, intrauterine growth retardation, congenital anomalies, 5-minute APGAR score <7, or other significant perinatal medical complications

AA/DHA-supplemented formula

Those randomized, formula from first week after delivery

Those exclusively breastfeeding, breast milk for first 3 months and then supplementation with Similac + iron

Solid food supplementation at 4 months

Willatts et al., 1998a

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=44)

Term

UK

Mothers from a single maternity hospital

LCPUFA-supplemented formula

Birth to 4 months of age

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Control formula:

No added LCPUFA

DHA formula group (fish oil):

0.2wt% DHA

DHA+AA formula group (egg yolk phospholipid):

0.12wt% DHA, 0.43wt% AA

There were no significant differences in Bayley scores among the groups for either the Mental Index or the Motor Index.

After controlling for maternal education and site, when comparing all four groups, the vocabulary comprehension score at 14 months was significantly lower in the DHA formula group compared to the breast-feeding group (p=0.017).

After controlling for maternal education and site, when comparing only the three formula groups, the vocabulary production score at 14 months was significantly lower in the DHA formula group compared to the control formula group (p=0.027).

No other reported associations between MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories at 14 months and the formula groups and those breast-feeding were found to be significant.

A

Unsupplemented formula (g/100 g fat):

11.40 LA, 0.70 ALA, <0.10 AA, no DHA

LCPUFA-supplemented formula (g/100 g fat):

11.50-12.80 LA, 0.60-0.65 ALA, 0.30-0.40 AA, 0.15-0.25 DHA

The median quartiles for entire problem intention score (p=0.035) and the cover step intention score (p=0.032) were significantly higher in the LCPUFA-supplemented group compared to the unsupplemented group.

The median quartiles for entire problem intentional solutions score (p=0.021) and cover step intentional solutions (p=0.005) were significantly higher in the LCPUFA-supplemented group compared to the unsupplemented group.

There were no significant differences in the median quartiles for the barrier step or cloth step for either the intention score or the intentional solutions score.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Willatts et al., 1998b

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=40)

Term

Birth weight 2500-4000 g

Dundee, UK

Mean maternal age about 27 years

Mean maternal education about 17 years

Demonstrated either an early or late peak fixation on the habituation assessment undertaken at 3 months of age

LCPUFA-supplemented formula

Birth to 4 months of age

Carlson and Werkman, 1996

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=59)

Mean gestational age about 28 weeks

Birth weight 747-1275 g

Predominantly Black

Memphis, TN

Mean mothers’ education about 12 years

No need for mechanical ventilation at that time; intraventricular hemorrhage > grade 2; retinopathy of prematurity > stage 2; surgery for necrotizing enterocolitis; weight < the fifth percentile for gestational age; history of maternal substance abuse

DHA-supplemented formula

Preterm formula from 3 days to 2 months of age

Term formula from 2 months to 12 months of age

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Unsupplemented formula (g/100 g fat):

11.40 LA, 0.70 ALA, <0.10 AA, no DHA

LCPUFA-supplemented formula (g/100 g fat):

11.50-12.80 LA, 0.60-0.65 ALA, 0.30-0.40 AA, 0.15-0.25 DHA

There were no significant differences in 9-month problem-solving scores (intention score and number of solutions) between the two groups.

For those who had an early peak fixation at 3 months, there were no significant differences in 9-month problem-solving score (intention score or intentional solutions) between the two groups (p=0.18).

For those who had a late peak fixation at 3 months, the number of intentional solutions was significantly higher in the LCPUFA-supplemented group compared to the unsupplemented group (p<0.02).

B

All in g/100 g total fatty acids

Preterm control formula:

21.20 LA, 2.40 ALA, no EPA or DHA

Preterm DHAsupplemented formula:

21.20 LA, 2.40 ALA, 0.06 EPA, 0.20 DHA

Term formula:

34.30 LA, 4.80 ALA, no EPA or DHA

At 12 months of age, the DHA-supplemented group had statistically more number of looks to familiar (p<0.05) and less seconds of time/novel looks (p<0.05) compared to the controls.

No other statistically significant results were reported on visual attention.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Werkman and Carlson, 1996

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=67)

Mean gestational age 29 weeks

Birth weight 748-1398 g

Can tolerate enteral; intakes >462 kJ/kg body weight/day for 5-7 days

Predominantly Black

Memphis, TN

Mean maternal age 23 years

Mean mothers’ education about 11.5 years

No need for mechanical ventilation at that time; intraventricular hemorrhage > grade 2; retinopathy of prematurity > stage 2; surgery for necrotizing enterocolitis; weight < the fifth percentile for gestational age; history of maternal substance abuse

DHA-supplemented formula

Preterm formula until discharge

Term formula from discharge until 9 months past term

Other foods gradually added to diet at about 4 months past term

Mixed diet, including whole cow’s milk from 9 to 12 months

Agostoni et al., 1995

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=86)

Mothers’ mean age = about 30 years

Gestational age between 37-42 weeks, weight at birth appropriate for gestational age

Milan, Italy

APGAR score better than 7 at 5 minutes, absence of disease

LCPUFA-supplemented formula

Within 3 days until 4 months of age

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

All in g/100 g total fatty acids

Preterm control formula:

19.1 LA, 3.0 ALA, no EPA or DHA

Preterm DHA-supplemented formula:

18.7 LA, 3.1 ALA, 0.3 EPA, 0.2 DHA

Term control formula:

33.2 LA, 4.8 ALA, no EPA or DHA

Term DHA-supplemented formula:

32.6 LA, 4.9 ALA, 0.3 EPA, 0.2 DHA

“Diet did not significantly influence look duration during familiarization, but there was a trend toward shorter look duration in DHA-supplemented infants compared to the controls.”

At 6.5 months of age, the DHA-supplemented group had a statistically higher number of total looks (p<0.01), number of looks to novel (p<0.01), and number of looks to familiar (p<0.05) compared to the controls.

At 9 months of age, the DHA-supplemented group had a statistically higher number of total looks (p<0.01), number of looks to novel (p<0.01), number of looks to familiar (p<0.05), and less seconds for average time/look (p<0.05) compared to the controls.

At 12 months, the DHA-supplemented group had a statistically shorter novel time as a percentage of total time (p<0.05), more seconds of time to familiar (p<0.05), and a higher number of total looks (p<0.01), number of looks to novel (p<0.05), and number of looks to familiar (p<0.05) compared to the controls.

No other significant results were reported for visual attention.

B

Supplemented formula (g/100 g fat):

10.80 LA, 0.30 GLA, 0.73 ALA, 0.44 AA, 0.05 EPA, 0.30 DHA

Standard formula (g/100 g fat):

11.10 LA, 0.70 ALA

Human milk (g/100 g fat):

6.9-16.4 LA, 0.1-0.9 GLA, 0.7-1.3 ALA, 0.2-1.2 AA, 0.0-0.6 EPA, 0.1-0.6 DHA

The mean developmental quotient (DQ) at 4 months for those in the standard formula group was statistically lower from the DQ in the supplemented formula group (p<0.05) and the breast-feeding group (p<0.05).

There was no statistical difference between the mean DQ at 4 months of the supplemented formula group and the breast-feeding group.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

McCann and Ames, 2005

Review

Summary of observational, RCTs, other experimental and animal studies

DHA status and LCPUFA-supplemented formula

 

Bryan et al., 2004

Review

Summary of the literature (all designs)

PUFA from breast milk or formula

 

Jacobson, 1999

Review

Mostly 2 prospective longitudinal studies

Detroit study on effects of prenatal exposure to alcohol

Michigan study of effects of pre- and postnatal exposure to PCBs

LCPUFA-supplemented formula

 

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

 

“Evidence from chronic dietary restriction rodent studies … shows that the addition of DHA to diets of animals whose brain concentration of DHA have been severely reduced restored control performance levels.”

“Formula comparison and maternal supplementation studies in humans and ALA dietary restriction studies in nonhuman primates both link the availability of n-3 LCPUFAs to the development of visual attention” and higher DHA status to enhanced neuromotor development.

RCTs in humans have often shown no effect of “LCPUFA supplementation on cognitive or behavioral performance and some reviewers have considered that, overall, the evidence was insufficient to conclude that LCPUFA supplementation benefited development.”

B

 

“There is moderate evidence that PUFAs, and long-chain omega-3 PUFAs in particular, from either breast milk or supplemented infant formula, are beneficial in the development of visual acuity and cognitive performance in infants.”

“There is very limited empirical evidence, due to the small number of extant studies, for the beneficial effects of PUFAs, and omega-3 PUFAs in particular, on cognitive performance in older children.”

“Evidence suggest that omega-3 PUFAs may have a role in the control of the symptoms of neurological disorders such as ADHD and dyslexia.”

B

 

“Any comparisons between breastfed and supplemented groups should include measures of maternal IQ and quality of parenting on which these groups tend to differ.”

“Animal and human studies indicating a relation between LCPUFA supplementation and enhanced visual acuity and shorter visual fixations may, in fact, represent relatively independent effects of supplementation on both acuity and cognitive processing speed.”

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Daniels et al., 2004

Cohort

Infants (n=1054)

Mothers’ mean age = 29 years

Majority of mothers with at least an O level (moderate) education

Bristol, UK

Singleton, term births

Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)

Seafood

Maternal fish intake: 32 weeks of gestation

Breast-feeding practices: 15 months after birth

Infant fish intake: 6 and 12 months after birth

Total mercury concentration: Cord blood at birth

Innis et al., 2001

Cohort

Infants (n=83)

Term

Birth weight 2500-4500 g

Mean mothers’ age 32 years

British Columbia

Intend to breast-feed for 3 months, no solid foods for at least the first 4 months after birth

No mothers with substance abuse, communicable diseases, metabolic or physiologic problems, infections likely to influence fetal growth, or multiple births

No infants with evidence of metabolic or physical abnormalities

Fatty acids in blood from infants and milk from mothers

2 months of age

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Maternal fish intake categories (during pregnancy):

1 = Rarely/never

2 = 1 meal/2 weeks

3 = 1-3 meals/week

4 = 4+ meals/week

Child fish intake categories (6 months of age):

1 = Rarely/never

2 = 1+ meal/week

Child fish intake categories (12 months of age):

1 = Rarely/never

2 = 1+ meal/week

Children whose mothers ate 1-3 fish meals/week and 4+ fish meals/week had significantly lower odds of low MCDI scores for social activity (OR=0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.8 and OR=0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.9, respectively) than the children whose mothers rarely or never ate fish during pregnancy.

Children whose mothers ate 1-3 fish meals/week and 4+ fish meals/week had significantly lower odds of low DDST scores for language (OR=0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.9 and OR=0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.9, respectively) than the children whose mothers rarely or never ate fish during pregnancy.

Children who ate 1+ fish meals/week had significantly lower odds of low MCDI scores for vocabulary comprehension (OR=0.7, 95% CI 0.5-0.8) and social activity (OR=0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.9) and total DDST score (OR=0.8, 95% CI 0.6-0.9).

All other odds ratios presented were nonsignificant.

B

Infant DHA: (g/100 g fatty acids) Plasma phospholipids = 2.2-8.0 RBC PE = 6.3-13.0 PC = 1.4-4.6

Infant AA: (g/100 g fatty acids) Plasma phospholipids = 8.1-15.8 RBC PE = 20.2-27.8 PC = 5.6-9.7

Mother’s milk: (g/100 g milk fatty acids) DHA = 0.10-2.50 AA = 0.20-0.81 LA = 6.30-21.50 LNA = 0.50-4.10

“The ability to correctly discriminate a retroflex compared with dental phonetic contrast at 9 months of age was positively correlated with the plasma phospholipid DHA (p<0.02) and the RBC PE at 2 months of age (p=0.02).”

“There were no significant correlations between the infants’ AA status and the ability to discriminate the native or nonnative language contrasts.”

“There were no significant correlations between the infant DHA or AA status at 2 months of age and test scores for novelty preference, or the job search task, with adjustments for covariates included in the model.”

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Kodas et al., 2004

Animal

2 generations of female Wistar rats

ALA-deficient diet

Control group: Control diet at birth to 60 days after birth

Deficient group: Deficient diet at birth to 60 days after birth

Diet reversed group 1: Control diet at day of birth until 60 days after birth

Diet reversed group 2: Deficient diet until day 7 postpartum and then control diet from day 7 to day 60 postpartum

Diet reversed group 3: Deficient diet until day 14 postpartum and then control diet from day 14 to day 60 postpartum

Diet reversed group 4: Deficient diet until day 21 postpartum and then control diet from day 21 to day 60 postpartum

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

ALA-deficient diet:

6% fat African peanut oil

<6 mg ALA/100 g of diet

1200 mg LA/100 g of diet

Control diet:

60% peanut oil, 40% rapeseed oil

200 mg ALA/100 g of diet

1200 mg LA/100 g of diet

The fatty acid composition of phosphatidylcholine in the hippocampus of 2-month-old rats was as follows: AA was not significantly different among the different diet groups; DHA was significantly higher in the control group and all diet reversed groups compared to the deficient group (p<0.05); n-6:n-3 was significantly lower in the control group and all diet reversed groups compared to the deficient group (p<0.05). These differences were not significant between the control group and the diet reversed groups.

The fatty acid composition of phosphatidylethanolamine in the hippocampus of 2-month-old rats was as follows:

AA was significantly lower in the control group and all diet reversed groups compared to the deficient group (p<0.05); DHA was significantly higher in the control group and all diet reversed groups compared to the deficient group (p<0.05); n-6:n-3 was significantly lower in the control group and all diet reversed groups compared to the deficient group (p<0.05). These differences were not significant between the control group and the diet reversed groups.

The fatty acid composition of phosphatidylserine in the hippocampus of 2-month-old rats was as follows: AA was not significantly different among the different diet groups; DHA was significantly higher in the control group and all diet reversed groups compared to the deficient group (p<0.05); n-6:n-3 was significantly lower in the control group and all diet reversed groups compared to the deficient group (p<0.05). These differences were not significant between the control group and the diet reversed groups.

Basal 5-HT levels were significantly higher in the deficient group compared with the control group (p<0.05); there were no significant differences in basal 5-HT levels between the diet reversed groups 1, 2, and 3 and the control group; there were no significant differences in basal 5-HT levels between the diet reversed group 4 and the control group, deficient group, and all other diet reversed groups.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Levant et al., 2004

Animal

Adult female Long-Evans rats

AA/EPA/DPA/DHA-deficient diet

Control diet: Day 1 of pregnancy until end of study

Deficient diet: Day 1 of pregnancy until postnatal day 21. Postnatal day 21, half on deficient diet were changed to remediation diet and half stayed on deficient diet

Chalon et al., 2001

Animal

Male rats 2-3 months old

ALA-deficient diet

2-3 months of age

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Control diet: 0.35 kg/5 kg diet from soybean oil; no detected AA, EPA, DPA, or DHA

Deficient diet: 0.35 kg/5 kg diet from sunflower oil; no detected AA, EPA, DPA, or DHA

Remediation diet: 0.3275 kg/5 kg diet from sunflower oil and 0.0225 kg/5 kg diet from fish oil

AA = 0.1 g/100 g fatty acids

EPA = 1.6 g/100 g fatty acids

DPA = 0.4 g/100 g fatty acids

DHA = 3.5 g/100 g fatty acids

“Rats raised on the deficient diet exhibited a decrease in brain DHA content to 80% of control animals at maturity (p<0.05)” and an “increase in DPA content to 575% of control animals at maturity (p<0.001).”

The remediation diet restored brain DHA and DPA content to levels similar to those on the control diet.

Catalepsy score was significantly lower in the deficient diet group compared to the control group (p<0.05) and the remediation diet group (p<0.05).

In a test of locomotor activity in a novel environment, the deficient diet group exhibited 187% of the activity of the control diet group during the 2-hour observation (p<0.05); results were similar between the deficient diet group and the remediation diet group.

In the test of amphetamine-stimulated locomotor activity, the deficient diet group exhibited 144% of the activity of the control group (p<0.05).

A

ALA-deficient diet:

1200 mg LA/100 g diet, <6 mg ALA/100 g diet

African peanut oil

Diet balanced in n-6 and n-3 PUFA:

1200 mg LA/100 g diet, 200 mg ALA/100 g

African peanut oil and rapeseed oil

“Intake of PUFA constitutes an environmental factor able to act on the central nervous system function.”

“Chronic dietary deficiency in ALA in rats induces abnormalities in several parameters of the mesocortical and mesolimbic dopaminergic systems.”

“It is proposed that strong links exist among PUFA status, neurotransmission processes, and behavioral disorders in humans.”

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

de la Presa, Owens, and Innis, 1999

Animal

Newborn male piglets

Birth weight >1 kg

<12 hours old

GLA/AA/DHA-supplemented formula

<12 hours old to 18 days of age

Delion et al., 1996

Animal

2 generations of female Wistar rats

ALA-deficient diet

2 weeks before mating (second generation)

*B = Evidence of a benefit; N = Evidence of no association or no clear association; A = Evidence of an adverse effect.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

4 formula diets (all in g/100 g):

Diet 1 (Diet D-):

1.6 LA, 0.1 ALA, no GLA, AA, or DHA

Diet 2 (Diet D+):

1.9 LA, 0.1 GLA, 0.4 AA, 0.1 ALA, 0.3 DHA

Diet 3 (Diet C-):

15.6 LA, 1.5 ALA, no GLA, AA, or DHA

Diet 4 (Diet C+):

16.4 LA, 0.1 GLA, 0.4 AA, 1.6 ALA, 0.3 DHA

There were no significant differences in brain weight, brain protein, DNA, cholesterol or phospholipid concentrations, or CNPase activity among the different diet groups.

Piglets fed formulas with AA and DHA had significantly higher frontal cortex dopamine, HVA, norepinephrine, tryptophan and serotonin concentrations than piglets fed formulas without AA and DHA.

The concentrations of all frontal cortex monoamines and metabolites in piglets fed Diet 2 formula were not different from those of piglets fed Diets 3 and 4.

The inclusion of AA and DHA in Diet 4 had no significant effect on any of the frontal cortex monoamines or metabolites measured, compared to Diet 3.

B

ALA-deficient diet:

6% fat as peanut oil

6 mg ALA/100 g diet

1200 mg LA/100 g diet

Control diet:

60% peanut oil, 40% rapeseed oil

200 mg ALA/100 g diet

1200 mg LA/100 g diet

In the control diet group, n-3 (mostly DHA) levels reached a maximum in the stratium and a minimum in the frontal cortex at 12 months of age and remained unchanged during aging in the cerebellum.

“In the deficient diet group, DHA content considerably reduced as compared with controls.”

No specific effects of the deficient diet were found on the proportion of any phospholipid classes.

In the control diet group, dopamine levels reached a maximum at 6 months of age, were decreased up to 12 months of age, and then stabilized in the stratium and frontal cortex. However, “the levels were not diet related in the stratium but were dramatically reduced in the frontal cortex of deficient rats and remained unchanged throughout all ages.”

In the control diet group, 5-HT levels increased between 2 and 6 months of age in the stratium and then stabilized; they did not change in the frontal cortex or cerebellum during aging.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

TABLE B-1h Studies on Allergies: Effects on Infants Supplemented with Omega-3 Fatty Acids in Formula

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Calder, 2001

Review

Summary of animal studies and human trials

Fish-oil supplement

 

Field et al., 2001

Review

Summary of animal studies and human trials

AA/DHA-supplemented formula

 

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

 

“Animal studies have shown that dietary fish oil results in altered lymphocyte function and in suppressed production of proinflammatory cytokines by macrophages.”

“Clinical studies have reported that fish-oil supplementation has beneficial effects in rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, and among some asthmatics.”

“The effect of fatty acids during pregnancy upon the maternal immune system and upon that of the infant are not known.”

B

 

“Recent research has been directed at the neurological, retinal, and membrane benefits of adding AA and DHA to infant formula. In adults and animals, feeding DHA affects T-cell function. However, the effect of these lipids on the development and function of the infant’s immune system is not known.”

“The addition of small amounts of DHA and AA (at levels similar to that in human milk) to preterm infant formula can influence the concentration, proportion, maturation, and cytokine production of peripheral blood lymphocytes.”

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Field et al., 2000

Randomized Controlled Trial

Infants (n=44)

Preterm, medically stable

Edmonton, AB, Canada

Appropriate weight for gestational age and receive 100% daily fluid and energy requirements enterally by day 14 postpartum

No major congenital infection, significant neonatal morbidity, or acute illness that precluded feeding by mouth; no mixed feedings or corticosteroids, red cell, and plasma transfusions, or intravenous lipid emulsion beyond day 8 postpartum

AA/DHA-supplemented formula

Before day 8 postpartum until day 42 postpartum

*B = Evidence of a benefit; N = Evidence of no association or no clear association.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Standard commercial preterm formula group (% weight of total fatty acids):

12.8 LA, 1.4 ALA, no AA or DHA

Supplemented preterm formula group

(% weight of total fatty acids):

12.10 LA, 1.50 ALA, 0.49 AA, 0.35 DHA

At 14 days postpartum, infants in the supplemented formula group had significantly higher hematocrit (L/L) concentrations compared to those in the human milk group (p<0.05).

At 14 days postpartum, infants in the human milk group had significantly higher monocytes compared to both the standard formula group and the supplemented formula group (p<0.05).

At 42 days postpartum, infants in the standard formula group had significantly higher T helper phenotypes and CD4/CD8 phenotypes compared to both the supplemented formula group and the human milk group (p<0.05).

At 42 days postpartum, infants in the standard formula group had significantly lower monocytes compared to the human milk group (p<0.05).

At 42 days postpartum, infants in the human milk group had significantly higher B cells compared to those in both formula groups (p<0.05).

At 42 days postpartum, infants in the standard formula group had significantly higher sIL-2R production compared to the supplemented formula group (p<0.05) and significantly lower IL-10 production compared to the human milk group (p<0.05).

No other reported results were found to be significant.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

TABLE B-1i Studies on ADHD: Effects on Children Supplemented with Omega-3 Fatty Acids in Foods Other Than Exclusively Breast Milk or Infant Formula Experimental Studies in Humans

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Richardson, 2004

Review

Summary of RCTs

HUFA supplement

 

Hirayama et al., 2004*

Randomized Controlled Trial

Children (n=40)

Aged 6-12 years

Recruited from a summer camp for children with psychiatric disorders

Diagnosed or suspected as ADHD

DHA supplement

2 months

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

 

Omega-3 fatty acids, particularly EPA, may be beneficial in the management of dyslexia, dyspraxia, and ADHD.

There is no evidence that omega-6 fatty acids are beneficial in the management of dyslexia, dyspraxia, and ADHD, but positive results have been found using an omega-3:omega-6 combination for both ADHD and dyslexia.

B

DHA group:

Fermented soybean milk 3 times/week (600 mg DHA/125 mL)

Bread rolls 2 times/week

(300 mg DHA/45 g)

Steamed bread 2 times/week

(600 mg DHA/60 g)

Total = 3600 mg DHA, 700 mg EPA/week

Control group:

Placebo food containing olive oil instead of DHA-rich fish oil

Short-term visual memory was significantly improved in the control group from baseline until the end of the study (p=0.02), but not in the DHA group. The short-term visual memory was significantly better in the control group than in the DHA group (p=0.02).

The number of errors of omission and commission were significantly improved in the continuous performance test in the control group from baseline until the end of the study (p=0.02 and p=0.01, respectively).

The number of errors of commission were significantly higher in the DHA group than in the control group (p=0.001).

A

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Harding et al., 2003*

Trial

Boys and girls (n=20)

Aged 7-12 years

Diagnosed with ADHD

No other medication or treatment, street drugs, other nutritional or botanical supplements, comorbid disorders

Multivitamin, multiple mineral, phytonutrients, essential fatty acid supplements

4 weeks

Stevens et al., 2003*

Randomized Controlled Trial

Boys and girls (n=47)

Aged 6-13

Central Indiana = 100-mile radius of West Lafayette

Those with diagnosed ADHD and those without ADHD

No chronic health problems

Presence of 1+ severe symptoms or several mild symptoms

PUFA supplement

4 months

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Groups determined by parental choice

Ritalin group:

5-15 mg Ritalin 2-3 times daily

Supplement group:

A multivitamin, multi-mineral, phytonutrients, essential fatty acids (180 mg EPA and 120 mg DHA from salmon oil and 45 mg GLA from borage oil) and phospholipids (soy lecithin), probiotics, and amino acids

Both the Ritalin group and the supplement group showed significant gains in the Full Scale Response Control Quotient and the Full Scale Attention Control Quotient scores (p≤0.01 and p≤0.001, respectively).

There were no significant differences in improvement between the two groups.

B

PUFA group:

8 capsules of PUFA/day

60 mg DHA, 10 mg EPA, 5 mg AA, 12 mg GLA, 3 mg vitamin E/capsule

Placebo group:

8 capsules of placebo/day

0.8 g olive oil/capsule

Based on those who completed the intervention, the change in teacher hit reaction time (measured both in ms and T-score) was significantly greater in the PUFA group than in the placebo group (p=0.05 and p=0.02, respectively) at 4 months.

At baseline, there were no significant differences in parents’ DBD and teachers’ DBD scores between the two groups; after 4 months of treatment the number of children who improved on the parents’ DBD attention and oppositional/defiant disorder scales was significantly higher in the PUFA group than in the placebo group (p=0.09 and p=0.02, respectively).

No other significant differences were found between the two groups.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Richardson and Puri, 2002*

Randomized Controlled Trial

Boys and girls (n=41)

Aged 8-12 years

Northern Ireland

Referred to a school for children with specific literacy problems

No official diagnosis of ADHD or any other psychiatric disorder; use of fatty acid supplements in last 6 months; consumption of oily fish >2 times/week; history of any other neurological or major psychiatric disorder or other significant medical problems; not in treatment for ADHD

HUFA supplement

12 weeks

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Supplement group:

186 mg EPA/day, 480 mg DHA/day, 96 mg GLA/day, 60 IU vitamin E/day, 864 mg LA/day, 42 mg AA/day, 8 mg thyme oil/day

Placebo:

Olive oil

At 3 months, the mean psychosomatic ADHD subscale, mean Conners’ ADHD index score, and mean DSM inattention score were significantly lower in the supplemented group than in the placebo group (p=0.05, p=0.03, p=0.05, respectively).

At 12 weeks, the improvements were significantly greater for the supplemented group compared to the placebo group for the cognitive problems (p=0.01), the anxious/shy subscales (p=0.04), and the Conners’ index global scale (p=0.02).

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Brue et al., 2001

Randomized Controlled Trial

Boys and girls (n=51)

Aged 4-12 years

Referred by parents, pediatricians, psychologists, psychiatrists, and educators

ADHD diagnosed by a physician or psychologist

No serious and preexisting medical or psychological condition or taking a stimulant medication other than Ritalin

Essential fatty acid supplement

Two 12-week trials

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Trial 1:

Treatment Group and Ritalin + Treatment Group:

10 mg Ginkgo biloba, 200 mg Melissa officinalis, 30 mg Grapine, 35 mg dimethylaminoethanol, 100 mg 1-glutamine

Placebo Group and Ritalin + Placebo Group:

200 mg Slippery elm supplement

Trial 2:

Double Treatment Group and Ritalin + Double Treatment Group:

20 mg Ginkgo biloba, 400 mg Melissa officinalis, 60 mg Grapine, 70 mg dimethylaminoethanol, 200 mg 1-glutamine

Double Treatment + EFA Group and Ritalin + Double Treatment + EFA Group:

20 mg Ginkgo biloba, 400 mg Melissa officinalis, 60 mg Grapine, 70 mg dimethylaminoethanol, 200 mg 1-glutamine, 1000 mg flaxseed

Based on parent and teacher reports from Trial 1, there were no significant differences in inattentiveness or hyperactive-impulsive subscales between any of the treatment groups and their respective controls.

Based on parent reports from Trial 2, those in the double treatment + EFA group had a significantly lower hyperactive-impulsive subscale score than the double treatment group (p=0.03).

Based on teacher reports from Trial 2, those in the Ritalin + double treatment + EFA group had a significantly higher inattentive subscale score than the Ritalin + double treatment group (p=0.04).

Based on teacher reports from Trial 2, those in the double treatment + EFA group had a significantly higher hyperactive-impulsive subscale score than the double treatment group (p=0.04).

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Voigt et al., 2001*

Randomized Controlled Trial

Boys and girls (n=63)

Aged 6-12 years

100% White in DHA group; 85% White in placebo group

Texas

No ineffective treatment with stimulant medication; treatment with other psychotropic medications; previous diagnosis of other childhood psychiatric disorders; use of dietary supplements; occurrence of a significant life event within 6 months; history of head injury or seizures; receipt of special education services for mental retardation or a pervasive developmental disorder; premature birth; exposure to tobacco, alcohol, or other drugs in utero; diagnosis of a disorder of lipid metabolism or other chronic medical condition

Previous diagnosis of ADHD

Being treated successfully with stimulant medication

Algae-derived triglyceride supplement

4 months

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Algae-derived TG capsule:

345 mg DHA/day

Between baseline and 4 months, TOVA errors of omission significantly increased (p=0.03-0.01) and color trails 1 (p=0.03-0.01) and color trails 2 (p=0.001) significantly decreased for the supplemented group.

Between baseline and 4 months, TOVA errors of commission (p<0.0003) and color trails 2 (p<0.0003) significantly decreased and TOVA total response time (p=0.03-0.01) significantly increased for the placebo group.

“There were no differences between groups at any time on any behavior measure by the parental Conners’ Rating Scales.”

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Stevens et al., 1995*

Case-control

Cases = boys with ADHD (n=53)

Control = healthy boys (n=43)

Aged 6-12 years

North central Indiana

Primarily White

Plasma fatty acid analysis

At time of visit

Mitchell et al., 1987*

Case-control

Cases = hyperactive children (n=48)

Controls = from two local primary schools (n=49)

Boys and girls

Mean age about 9 years

92% European

About 95% mothers in top three socioeconomic groups

Auckland, New Zealand

Serum fatty acid levels

At time of visit

Mitchell et al., 1983*

Case-control

Cases = from a residential school for “maladjusted” children (n=23)

Controls = from a normal intermediate school (n=20)

Boys and girls

Aged 10-13 years for controls

Aged 7.5-13 years for cases

Auckland, New Zealand

Level of red blood cell essential fatty acids

At time of visit

*Included in Schachter HM, Kourad K, Merali Z, Lumb A, Tran K, Miguelez M. 2005. Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Mental Health. Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 116 (Prepared by the University of Ottawa Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02-0021). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

**B = Evidence of a benefit; A = Evidence of an adverse effect; N = Evidence of no association or no clear association.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Omega-3 fatty acids as continuous variables

Boys with ADHD had significantly lower mean levels of plasma AA, EPA, and DHA than the controls (p<0.02, p<0.02, p<0.03, respectively).

Boys with ADHD had significantly lower mean levels of red blood cell AA (p<0.02), 22:4n-6 (p<0.03), and DHA (p<0.06), and significantly higher mean levels of red blood cell 22:5n-6 (p<0.05) compared to the controls.

B

Omega-3 fatty acids as continuous variables

The mean level of DHA from nonfasting blood samples was significantly lower in the hyperactive children than in the controls (p=0.045).

The mean levels of DGLA and AA from nonfasting blood samples were significantly lower in the hyperactive children than in the controls (p=0.007 and p=0.027, respectively).

No significant differences in blood serum n-3 or n-6 fatty acids were found.

B

Omega-3 fatty acids as continuous variables

The mean levels of LA, DGLA, and AA from fasting blood samples were lower in the “maladjusted” children than in the normal children (0.05<p<0.01), although the differences were not significant.

The mean level of 22:5n-6 from fasting blood samples was higher in the “maladjusted” children than in the normal children (0.05<p<0.1), although this difference was not significant.

No other significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of fatty acid levels in fasting blood samples.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

TABLE B-1j Studies on Allergies and Asthma: Effects on Children Supplemented with Omega-3 Fatty Acids in Foods Other Than Exclusively Breast Milk or Infant Formula

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Peat et al., 2004

Randomized Controlled Trial

Pregnant women (n=616)

Mean age about 29 years

About 47% tertiary educated

Sydney, Australia

At least one parent or sibling with current asthma or frequent wheeze; fluency in English; a telephone at home; residence within 30 km of the recruitment center

No pet at home; vegetarian diet; multiple births; or less than 36 weeks gestation

The Childhood Asthma Prevention Study (CAPS)

Tuna-fish oil supplement

Child’s age of 6 months to 3 years

Hodge et al., 1998*

Randomized Controlled Trial

Boys and girls (n=39)

Aged 8-12 years

Sydney, Australia

Asthmatic with a history of episodic wheeze in the last 12 months and airway hyperresponsiveness to histamine

No other significant diseases; taking regular oral corticosteroids or with known aspirin or dietary salicylate sensitivity

EPA/DHA supplement

6 months

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Intervention group:

500 mg/day tuna fish oil

184 mg omega-3 fatty acids

Placebo group:

Sunola oil

83% monounsaturated oil

At 3 years of age, there were no significant differences in prevalence of asthma, wheezing, eczema, and atopy between the intervention group and the placebo group. However, those in the intervention group had significantly lower prevalence of mild or moderate coughing (p=0.03) and atopic coughing (p=0.003) than the placebo group.

N

Omega-3 group:

0.18 g EPA and 0.12 g DHA/capsule

4 capsules/day = 1.2 g omega-3/day

Omega-6 group:

0.45 g safflower oil, 0.45 g palm oil, 0.10 g olive oil/capsule

No EPA or DHA

“There was no significant change in spirometric function, dose response ratio to histamine or asthma severity score at either 3 or 6 months in either group.”

“There were no significant differences between groups in TNFα production over time (p=0.22).”

“Dietary enrichment of omega-3 fatty acids over 6 months increased plasma levels of these fatty acids, reduced stimulated tumour necrosis factor α production, but had no effect on the clinical severity of asthma in these children.”

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Denny et al., 2003

Review

18 cross-sectional studies

4 case-control studies

3 cohort studies

Dietary PUFA

 

Smit et al., 1999

Review

All epidemiological evidence

Seafood

 

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

 

“Very few studies investigated the effects of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma, and the results of those that were found showed conflicting results.”

“It is very difficult to draw any conclusions on the true impact of dietary PUFA intake on respiratory health.”

“The evidence in this review suggests that diet does play a role in asthma and COPD, but the causality of association cannot be confirmed because of the observational nature of most of the studies.”

N

 

“The findings of several large studies in adults suggest that high fish intake has beneficial effects on lung function.”

“The relationship between fish intake and respiratory symptoms and clinical disease is less evident.”

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Peat et al., 1998*

Review

Longitudinal cohort studies and cross-sectional studies

Diet

 

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

 

In cross-sectional studies, the risk factors for presence in:

  1. Airway narrowing are atopy, family history of asthma, gender (male), and parental smoking;

  2. Airway size are low birth weight, parental smoking, and diet (low magnesium or antioxidant intake);

  3. Airway hyperresponsiveness are atopy, family history of asthma, high allergen exposure, and diet (high sodium/magnesium or low omega-3 fatty acid intake).

In longitudinal studies, the risk factors for ongoing conditions from:

  1. Airway narrowing are atopy early in childhood, gender (female), parental smoking, symptoms that begin before age 5, persistent wheeze in childhood in the absence of respiratory infection, and reduced expiratory flow rate;

  2. Airway size are atopy, gender (female), and airway hyperresponsiveness;

  3. Airway hyperresponsiveness are atopy in early childhood, airway hyperresponsiveness in childhood, reduced expiratory flow rate, and gender (female).

Important future longitudinal studies will be those that divide the broad spectrum of asthma into phenotypic groups.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Takemura et al., 2002*

Case-control

Cases = currently asthmatic students (n=1673)

Controls = students who were never asthmatic (n=22,109)

Boys and girls

Elementary and junior high school students

Aged 6-15 years,

Tokorozawa City, Japan

Tokorozawa Childhood Asthma and Pollinosis Study

Seafood

 

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Fish intake categories:

1 = Almost none

2 = 1-2 times/month

3 = 1-2 times/week

4 = ≥3-4 times/week

Serving size unspecified; cited that “most of the variation is explained by frequency of use rather than differences in serving sizes”

After adjusting for age, gender, parental history of asthma:

The OR for current asthma was slightly significantly higher for those who ate fish 1-2 times/week compared to those who ate fish 1-2 times/month (OR=1.133, 95% CI 1.021-1.258); and

Although the ORs for current asthma were not significant for those who ate fish almost never (OR=0.957, 95% CI 0.725-1.263) and ≥3-4 times/week (OR=1.334, 95% CI 0.907-1.963) compared to those who ate fish 1-2 times/month, there was a significant positive trend with an increase of fish consumption (p for trend = 0.0078).

After adjusting for age, gender, parental history of asthma, and vegetable and fruit intake:

The OR for current asthma was slightly significantly higher for those who ate fish 1-2 times/week compared to those who ate fish 1-2 times/month (OR=1.117, 95% CI 1.005-1.241); and

Although the ORs for current asthma were not significant for those who ate fish almost never (OR=1.039, 95% CI 0.785-1.376) and ≥3-4 times/week (OR=1.319, 95% CI 0.896-1.943) compared to those who ate fish 1-2 times/month, there was a significant positive trend with an increase of fish consumption (p for trend = 0.0349).

A

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Hodge et al., 1996*

Case-control

Boys and girls (n=468)

Aged 8-11

Sydney, Australia

With airway hyperresponsiveness, wheeze in the last 12 months, and 3-in-5 sample of children with no airway hyperresponsiveness or wheeze in the last 12 months

Seafood

In the past year

Ellwood et al., 2001

Ecological

Children

Aged 6-7 and 13-14 years

53 countries

The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC)

Data from FAO Food Balance Sheet

PUFA and seafood intake

 

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Total fish intake/week

Ever eat fresh fish, fresh oily fish, or fresh non-oily fish

There were no significant differences in total fish intake between children with normal airways (1.2 servings, 95% CI 1.0-1.3), airway hyperresponsiveness (1.2 servings, 95% CI 0.9-1.5), wheeze (1.2 servings, 95% CI 0.8-1.5) and current asthma (1.0 servings, 95% CI 0.8-1.2).

Significantly fewer children with asthma ever ate oil fish compared to children with normal airways (p<0.05); however, there was no significant difference between those with current asthma and normal children who ate exclusively oily fish.

After adjusting for atopy, parental asthma, parental smoking, ethnicity, country of birth, early respiratory illness, and sex:

Children who ate oily fish had a significantly lower OR of current asthma when compared to children who did not eat oily fish (OR=0.26, 95% CI 0.09-0.72); and

There were no other significant associations found between type of fish (fresh fish, oily fish, non-oily fish) and airway hyperresponsiveness, wheeze, or current asthma.

B

Percentage of total energy consumed as PUFA: 3%-12%

Range of fish intake not reported

There were no significant associations found between total PUFA intake (% of total fat) for current wheezing, severe wheezing, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and atopic eczema.

There was a significant inverse association found between all fish (fresh and frozen) consumption and asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, and atopic eczema, for the 13- to 14-year-old age group; the same inverse association remained for the 6- to 7-year-old age group, but the association was weaker.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Timing of Exposure

Satomi et al., 1994*

Ecological

Boys and girls (n=7742)

Aged 6-11 years

Japan

1st-, 3rd-, 5th-grade students

Coastal schools = fish harvest and consumption are high

Inland schools = located far from sea but close to the coast school district

Seafood

 

*Included in Schachter HM, Reisman J, Tran K, Dales B, Kourad K, Barnes D, Sampson M, Morrison A, Gaboury I, Blackman J. 2004. Health Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Asthma. Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 91 (Prepared by the University of Ottawa Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02-0021). AHRQ Publication No. 04-E013-2. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

**N = Evidence of no association or no clear association; B = Evidence of a benefit; A = Evidence of an adverse effect.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Fish consumption categories:

Very often = ≥4-5 times/week

Relatively often = 2-3 times/week

Often = 1 time/week

Infrequently = 1-2 times/month

Seldom = <1 time/month

Coastal school children who ate reddish fish (sardine, mackerel, pike) very often had a significantly lower prevalence of history of asthma than those who seldom ate reddish fish (p<0.01). There were no other significant differences for these children based on consumption of pale fish, shellfish, fish-paste, seaweed, and dried fish.

Inland school children who ate pale fish (flatfish, sea bream, turbot) and seaweed very often had significantly higher prevalence of history of asthma than those who seldom ate pale fish and seaweed (p<0.01; 0.01<p<0.05, respectively). There were no other significant differences for these children based on reddish fish, shellfish, fish-paste, and dried fish.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

REFERENCES

Agostoni C, Trojan S, Bellu R, Riva E, Giovannini M. 1995. Neurodevelopmental quotient of healthy term infants at 4 months and feeding practice: The role of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids. Pediatric Research 38(2):262–266.

Al MDM, van Houwelingen AC, Kester ADM, Hasaart THM, de Jong AEP, Hornstra G. 1995. Maternal essential fatty acid patterns during normal pregnancy and their relationship to the neonatal essential fatty acid status. British Journal of Nutrition 74(1):55–68.

Auestad N, Halter R, Hall RT, Blatter M, Bogle ML, Burks W, Erickson JR, Fitzgerald KM, Dobson V, Innis SM, Singer LT, Montalto MB, Jacobs JR, Qiu W, Bornstein MH. 2001. Growth and development in term infants fed long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids: A double-masked, randomized, parallel, prospective, multivariate study. Pediatrics 108(2): 372–381.

Birch EE, Birch DG, Hoffman DR, Uauy R. 1992. Dietary essential fatty acid supply and visual acuity development. Investigations in Ophthalmology and Visual Science 33(11):3242–3253.

Birch EE, Hoffman DR, Uauy R, Birch DG, Prestidge C. 1998. Visual acuity and the essentiality of docosahexaenoic acid and arachidonic acid in the diet of term infants. Pediatric Research 44(2):201–209.

Birch EE, Garfield S, Hoffman DR, Uauy R, Birch DG. 2000. A randomized controlled trial of early dietary supply of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and mental development in term infants. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 42(3):174–181.

Birch EE, Hoffman DR, Castaneda YS, Fawcett SL, Birch DG, Uauy RD. 2002. A randomized controlled trial of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation of formula in term infants after weaning at 6 wk of age. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 75(3):570–580.

Bjerve KS, Brubakk AM, Fougner KJ, Johnsen H, Midthjell K, Vik T. 1993. Omega-3 fatty acids: Essential fatty acids with important biological effects, and serum phospholipid fatty acids as markers of dietary omega 3-fatty acid intake. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 57(Suppl 5):801S–805S.

Bougle D, Denise P, Vimard F, Nouvelot A, Penneillo MJ, Guillois B. 1999. Early neurological and neuropsychological development of the preterm infant and polyunsaturated fatty acids supply. Clinical Neurophysiology 110(8):1363–1370.

Bouwstra H, Dijck-Brouwer DA, Wildeman JA, Tjoonk HM, van der Heide JC, Boersma ER, Muskiet FA, Hadders-Algra M. 2003. Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids have a positive effect on the quality of general movements of healthy term infants. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 78(2):313–318.

Bouwstra H, Dijck-Brouwer DA, Boehm G, Boersma ER, Muskiet FA, Hadders-Algra M. 2005. Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids and neurological developmental outcome at 18 months in healthy term infants. Acta Paediatric 94(1):26–32.

Bouzan C, Cohen JT, Connor WE, Kris-Etherton PM, Gray GM, Konig A, Lawrence RS, Savitz DA, Teutsch SM. 2005. A quantitative analysis of fish consumption and stroke risk. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 29(4):347–352.

Brue AW, Oakland TD, Evans RA. 2001. The use of a dietary supplement combination and an essential fatty acid as an alternative and complementary treatment for children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. The Scientific Review of Alternative Medicine 5(4):187–194.

Bryan J, Osendarp S, Hughes D, Calvaresi E, Baghurst K, van Klinken J-W. 2004. Nutrients for cognitive development in school-aged children. Nutrition Reviews 62(8):295–306.

Bulstra-Ramakers MT, Huisjes HJ, Visser GH. 1995. The effects of 3g eicosapentaenoic acid daily on recurrence of intrauterine growth retardation and pregnancy induced hypertension. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 102(2):123–126.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Calder PC. 2001. Polyunsaturated fatty acids, inflammation, and immunity. Lipids 36(9):1007–1024.

Carlson SE, Neuringer M. 1999. Polyunsaturated fatty acid status and neurodevelopment: A summary and critical analysis of the literature. Lipids 34(2):171–178.

Carlson SE, Werkman SH. 1996. A randomized trial of visual attention of preterm infants fed docosahexaenoic acid until two months. Lipids 31(1):85–90.

Carlson SE, Rhodes PG, Ferguson MG. 1986. Docosahexaenoic acid status of preterm infants at birth and following feeding with human milk or formula. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 44(6):798–804.

Carlson SE, Werkman SH, Rhodes PG, Tolley EA. 1993. Visual-acuity development in healthy preterm infants: Effect of marine-oil supplementation. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 58(1):35–42.

Carlson SE, Ford AJ, Werkman SH, Peeples JM, Koo WW. 1996a. Visual acuity and fatty acid status of term infants fed human milk and formulas with and without docosahexaenoate and arachidonate from egg yolk lecithin. Pediatric Research 39(5):882–888.

Carlson SE, Werkman SH, Tolley EA. 1996b. Effect of long-chain n-3 fatty acid supplementation on visual acuity and growth of preterm infants with and without bronchopulmonary dysplasia. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 63(5):687–697.

Carlson SE, Werkman SH, Montalto MB, Tolley EA. 1999. Visual acuity development of preterm (PT) infants fed docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and arachidonic acid (ARA): Effect of age at supplementation. Pediatric Research 45:279A.

Chalon S, Vancassel S, Zimmer L, Guilloteau D, Durand G. 2001. Polyunsaturated fatty acids and cerebral function: Focus on monoaminergic neurotransmission. Lipids 36(9):937–944.

Cheruku SR, Montgomery-Downs HE, Farkas SL, Thoman EB, Lammi-Keefe CJ. 2002. Higher maternal plasma docosahexaenoic acid during pregnancy is associated with more mature neonatal sleep-state patterning. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 76(3):608–613.

Clandinin MT, Chappell JE, Leong S, Heim T, Swyer PR, Change GW. 1980b. Extrauterine fatty acid accretion in infant brain: Implications for fatty acid requirements. Early Human Development 4(2):131–138.

Clandinin MT, Van Aerde JE, Merkel KL, Harris CL, Springer MA, Hansen JW, Diersen-Schade DA. 2005. Growth and development of preterm infants fed infant formulas containing docosahexaenoic acid and arachidonic acid. Journal of Pediatrics 146(4):461–468.

Clausen T, Slott M, Solvoll K, Drevon CA, Vollset SE, Henriksen T. 2001. High intake of energy, sucrose, and polyunsaturated fatty acids is associated with increased risk of pre-eclampsia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 185(2):451–458.

Cohen JT, Bellinger DC, Connor WE, Shaywitz BA. 2005. A quantitative analysis of prenatal intake of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and cognitive development. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 29(4):366–374.

Colombo J, Kannass KN, Shaddy DJ, Kundurthi S, Maikranz JM, Anderson CJ, Blaga OM, Carlson SE. 2004. Maternal DHA and the development of attention in infancy and toddlerhood. Child Development 75(4):1254–1267.

Daniels JL, Longnecker MP, Rowland AS, Golding J, the ALSPAC Study Team. 2004. Fish intake during pregnancy and early cognitive development of offspring. Epidemiology 15(4):394–402.

de Groot RH, Hornstra G, van Houwelingen AC, Roumen F. 2004. Effect of alpha-linolenic acid supplementation during pregnancy on maternal and neonatal polyunsaturated fatty acid status and pregnancy outcome. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 79(2):251–260.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

de la Presa Owens S, Innis SM. 1999. Docosahexaenoic and arachidonic acid prevent a decrease in dopaminergic and serotoninergic neurotransmitters in frontal cortex caused by a linoleic and α-linolenic acid deficient diet in formula-fed piglets. Journal of Nutrition 129(11):2088–2093.

Delion S, Chalon S, Guilloteau D, Besnard J-C, Durand G. 1996. α-linolenic acid dietary deficiency alters age-related changes of dopaminergic and serotoninergic neurotransmission in the rat frontal cortex. Journal of Neurochemistry 66(4):1582–1591.

Denburg JA, Hatfield HM, Cyr MM, Hayes L, Holt PG, Sehmi R, Dunstan JA, Prescott SL. 2005. Fish oil supplementation in pregnancy modifies neonatal progenitors at birth in infants at risk of atopy. Pediatric Research 57(2):276–281.

Denny SI, Thompson RL, Margetts BM. 2003. Dietary factors in the pathogenesis of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Current Allergy and Asthma Reports 3(2):130–136.

Dunstan JA, Mori TA, Barden A. 2003a. Fish oil supplementation in pregnancy modifies neonatal allergen-specific immune responses and clinical outcomes in infants at high risk of atopy: A randomized, controlled trial. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 112(6):1178–1184.

Dunstan JA, Mori TA, Barden A. 2003b. Maternal fish oil supplementation in pregnancy reduces interleukin-13 levels in cord blood of infants at high risk of atopy. Clinical and Experimental Allergy 33(4):442–448.

Ellwood P, Asher MI, Bjorksten B, Burr M, Pearce N, Robertson CF. 2001. Diet and asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and atopic eczema symptom prevalence: An ecological analysis of the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) data. ISAAC Phase One Study Group. European Respiratory Journal 17(3):436–443.

Farquharson J, Jamieson EC, Logan RW, Cockburn MD, Patrick WA. 1992. Infant cerebral cortex phospholipid fatty-acid composition and diet. Lancet 340(8823):810–813.

Fewtrell MS, Morley R, Abbott A, Singhal A, Isaacs EB, Stephenson T, MacFadyen U, Lucas A. 2002. Double-blind, randomized trial of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation in formula fed to preterm infants. Pediatrics 110(1):73–82.

Fewtrell MS, Abbott RA, Kennedy K, Singhal A, Morley R, Caine E, Jamieson C, Cockburn F, Lucas A. 2004. Randomized, double-blind trial of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation with fish oil and borage oil in preterm infants. Journal of Pediatrics 144(4):471–479.

Field CJ, Thomson CA, Van Aerde JE, Parrott A, Euler A, Lien E, Clandinin MT. 2000. Lower proportion of CD45R0+ cells and deficient interleukin-10 production by formula-fed infants, compared with human-fed, is corrected with supplementation of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 31(3):291–299.

Field CJ, Clandinin MT, Van Aerde JE. 2001. Polyunsaturated fatty acids and T-cell function: Implications for the neonate. Lipids 36(9):1025–1032.

Gibson RA, Chen W, Makrides M. 2001. Randomized trials with polyunsaturated fatty acid interventions in preterm and term infants: Functional and clinical outcomes. Lipids 36(9):873–883.

Grandjean P, Bjerve KS, Weihe P, Steuerwald U. 2001. Birthweight in a fishing community: Significance of essential fatty acids and marine food contaminants. International Journal of Epidemiology 30(6):1272–1278.

Haggarty P, Page K, Abramovich DR, Ashton J, Brown D. 1997. Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid transport across the perfused human placenta. Placenta 18(8):635–642.

Haggarty P, Ashton J, Joynson M, Abramovich DR, Page K. 1999. Effect of maternal polyunsaturated fatty acid concentration on transport by the human placenta. Biology of the Neonate 75(6):350–359.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Haggarty P, Abramovich DR, Page K. 2002. The effect of maternal smoking and ethanol on fatty acid transport by the human placenta. British Journal of Nutrition 87(3):247–252.

Harding KL, Judah RD, Gant C. 2003. Outcome-based comparison of Ritalin versus food-supplement treated children with AD/HD. Alternative Medicine Review 8(3):319–330.

Harper V, MacInnes R, Campbell D, Hall M. 1991. Increased birth weight in northerly islands: Is fish consumption a red herring? British Medical Journal 303(6795):166.

Haugen G, Helland I. 2001. Influence of preeclampsia or maternal intake of omega-3 fatty acids on the vasoactive effect of prostaglandin F-two-alpha in human umbilical arteries. Gynecologic and Obstetrical Investigations 52(2):75–81.

Hawkes JS, Bryan D-L, Makrides M, Neumann MA, Gibson RA. 2002. A randomized trial of supplementation with docosahexaenoic acid–rich tuna oil and its effects on the human milk cytokines interleukin 1β, interleukin 6, and tumor necrosis factor. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 75(4):754–760.

Helland IB, Saugstad OD, Smith L, Saarem K, Solvoll K, Ganes T, Drevon CA. 2001. Similar effects on infants of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids supplementation to pregnant and lactating women. Pediatrics 108(5):e82. [Online]. Available: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/108/5/e82 [accessed August 22, 2005].

Helland IB, Smith L, Saarem K, Saugstad OD, Drevon CA. 2003. Maternal supplementation with very-long-chain n-3 fatty acids during pregnancy and lactation augments children’s IQ at 4 years of age. Pediatrics 111(1):39–44.

Hibbeln JR. 2002. Seafood consumption, the DHA content of mothers’ milk and prevalence rates of postpartum depression: A cross-national, ecological analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders 69(1–3):15–29.

Hibbeln JR, Salem N Jr. 1995. Dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids and depression: When cholesterol does not satisfy. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 62(1):1–9.

Hirayama S, Hamazaki T, Terasawa K. 2004. Effect of docosahexaenoic acid-containing food administration on symptoms of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder—a placebo-controlled double-blind study. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 58(3):467–473.

Hodge L, Salome CM, Peat JK, Haby MM, Xuan W, Woolcock AJ. 1996. Consumption of oily fish and childhood asthma risk. Medical Journal of Australia 164(3):137–140.

Hodge L, Salome CM, Hughes JM, Liu-Brennan D, Rimmer J, Allman M, Pang D, Armour C, Woolcock AJ. 1998. Effect of dietary intake of omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids on severity of asthma in children. European Respiratory Journal 11(2):361–365.

Hoffman DR, Birch EE, Castaneda YS, Fawcett SL, Wheaton DH, Birch DG, Uauy R. 2003. Visual function in breast-fed term infants weaned to formula with or without long-chain polyunsaturated at 4 to 6 months: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Pediatrics 142(6):669–677.

Holman RT, Johnson SB, Ogburn PL. 1991. Deficiency of essential fatty acids and membrane fluidity during pregnancy and lactation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 88(11):4835–4839.

Innis SM, Gilley J, Werker J. 2001. Are human milk long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids related to visual and neural development in breast-fed term infants? Journal of Pediatrics 139(4):532–538.

Innis SM, Adamkin DH, Hall RT, Kalhan SC, Lair C, Lim M, Stevens DC, Twist PF, Diersen-Schade DA, Harris CL, Merkel KL, Hansen JW. 2002. Docosahexaenoic acid and arachidonic acid enhance growth with no adverse effects in preterm infants fed formula. Journal of Pediatrics 140(5):547–554.

Jacobson SW. 1999. Assessment of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid nutritional supplementation on infant neurobehavioral development and visual acuity. Lipids 34(2):151–160.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Jensen CL, Voigt RG, Llorente AM, Peters SU, Prager TC, Zou Y, Fraley JK, Heird WC. 2004. Effect of maternal docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation on neuropsychological and visual status of former breast-fed infants at five years of age. Pediatric Research (abstract) 55:181A.

Jensen CL, Voigt RG, Prager TC, Zou YL, Fraley JK, Rozelle JC, Turcich MR, Llorente AM, Anderson RE, Heird WC. 2005. Effects of maternal docosahexaenoic acid intake on visual function and neurodevelopment in breastfed term infants. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 82(1):125–132.

Kesmodel U, Olsen SF, Salvig JD. 1997. Marine n-3 fatty acid and calcium intake in relation to pregnancy induced hypertension, intrauterine growth retardation, and preterm delivery. A case-control study. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 76(1):38–44.

Kodas E, Galineau L, Bodard S, Vancassel S, Guilloteau D, Besnard J-C, Chalon S. 2004. Serotoninergic neurotransmission is affected by n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in the rat. Journal of Neurochemistry 89(3):695–702.

Koletzko B, Agostoni C, Carlson SE, Clandinin T, Hornstra G, Neuringer M, Uauy R, Yamashiro Y, Willatts P. 2001. Acta Paediatrica 90(4):460–464.

Lauritzen L, Hansen HS, Jorgensen MH, Michaelsen KF. 2001. The essentiality of long chain n-3 fatty acids in relation to development and function of the brain and retina. Progress in Lipid Research 40(1–2):1–94.

Leary SD, Ness AR, Emmett PM, Davey Smith G, Headley JE, ALSPAC Study Team. 2005. Maternal diet in pregnancy and offspring blood pressure. Archives of Disease in Childhood 90(5):492–493.

Levant B, Radel JD, Carlson SE. 2004. Decreased brain docosahexaenoic acid during development alters dopamine-related behaviors in adult rats that are differentially affected by dietary remediation. Behavioural Brain Research 152(1):49–57.

Llorente AM, Jensen CL, Voigt RG, Fraley JK, Berretta MC, Heird WC. 2003. Effect of maternal docosahexaenoic acid supplementation on postpartum depression and information processing. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 188(5):1348–1353.

Lucas A, Stafford M, Morley R, Abbott R, Stephenson T, MacFadyen U, Elias A, Clements H. 1999. Efficacy and safety of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation of infant-formula milk: A randomised trial. Lancet 354(9194):1948–1954.

Lucas M, Dewailly E, Muckle G, Ayotte P, Bruneau S, Gingras S, Rhainds M, Holub BJ. 2004. Gestational age and birth weight in relation to n-3 fatty acids among Inuit (Canada). Lipids 39(7):617–626.

Makrides M, Gibson RA. 2000. Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid requirements during pregnancy and lactation. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 71(1 Suppl):307S–311S.

Makrides M, Neumann MA, Byard RW, Simmer K, Gibson RA. 1994. Fatty acid composition of brain, retina, and erythrocytes in breast- and formula-fed infants. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 60(2):189–194.

Makrides M, Neumann MA, Simmer K, Gibson RA. 2000. A critical appraisal of the role of dietary long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids on neural indices of term infants: A randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 105(1 Part 1):32–38.

Martinez M. 1992. Tissue levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids during early human development. Journal of Pediatrics 120(3 Part 2):S129–S138.

McCann JC, Ames BN. 2005. Is docosahexaenoic acid, an n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid, required for development of normal brain function? An overview of evidence from cognitive and behavioral tests in humans and animals. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 82(2):281–295.

Mitchell EA. 1987. Clinical characteristics and serum essential fatty acid levels in hyperactive children. Clinical Pediatrics 26(8):406–411.

Mitchell EA, Lewis S, Cutler DR. 1983. Essential fatty acids and maladjusted behaviour in children. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Medicine 12(3):281–287.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Neuringer M, Connor WE, Van Petten C, Barstad L. 1984. Dietary omega-3 fatty acid deficiency and visual loss in infant rhesus monkeys. Journal of Clinical Investigations 73(1):272–276.

Neuringer M, Connor WE, Lin DS, Barstad L, Luck S. 1986. Biochemical and functional effects of prenatal and postnatal ω3 fatty acid deficiency on retina and brain in rhesus monkeys. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 83(11):4021–4025.

Newson RB, Shaheen SO, Henderson AJ, Emmett PM, Sherriff A, Calder PC. 2004. Umbilical cord and maternal blood red cell fatty acids and early childhood wheezing and eczema. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 114(3):531–537.

O’Connor DL, Hall R, Adamkin D, Auestad N, Castillo M, Connor WE, Connor SL, Fitzgerald K, Groh-Wargo S, Hartman EE, Jacobs J, Janowsky J, Lucas A, Margeson D, Mena P, Neuringer M, Nesin M, Singer L, Stephenson T, Szabo J, Zemon V. 2001. Growth and development in preterm infants fed long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids: A prospective, randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics 108(2):259–371.

Oken E, Kleinman KP, Olsen SF, Rich-Edwards JW, Gillman MW. 2004. Associations of seafood and elongated n-3 fatty acid intake with fetal growth and length of gestation: Results from a US pregnancy cohort. American Journal of Epidemiology 160(8):774–783.

Oken E, Wright RO, Kleinman KP, Bellinger D, Hu H, Rich-Edwards JW, Gillman MW. 2005. Maternal fish consumption, hair mercury, and infant cognition in a US cohort. Environmental Health Perspectives 113(10):1376–1380.

Olsen SF, Secher NJ. 1990. A possible preventive effect of low-dose fish oil on early delivery and pre-eclampsia: Indications from a 50-year-old controlled trial. British Journal of Nutrition 64(3):599–609.

Olsen SF, Secher NJ. 2002. Low consumption of seafood in early pregnancy as a risk factor for preterm delivery: Prospective cohort study. British Medical Journal 324(7335):447–450.

Olsen SF, Hansen HS, Sommer S, Jensen B, Sorensen TI, Secher NJ, Zachariassen P. 1991. Gestational age in relation to marine n-3 fatty acids in maternal erythrocytes: A study of women in the Faroe Islands and Denmark. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 164(5 Part 1):1203–1209.

Olsen SF, Sorensen JD, Secher NJ, Hedegaard M, Henriksen TB, Hansen HS, Grant A. 1992. Randomised controlled trial of effect of fish-oil supplementation on pregnancy duration. Lancet 339(8800):1003–1007.

Olsen SF, Secher NJ, Tabor A, Weber T, Walker JJ, Gluud C, Fish Oil Trials In Pregnancy (FOTIP) Team. 2000. Randomised clinical trials of fish oil supplementation in high risk pregnancies. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 107(3):382–395.

Onwude JL, Lilford RJ, Hjartardottir H, Staines A, Tuffnell D. 1995. A randomized double blinded placebo controlled trial of fish oil in high risk pregnancy. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 102(2):95–100.

Otto SJ, van Houwelingen AC, Badart-Smook A, and Hornstra G. 2001. Comparison of the peripartum and postpartum phospholipid polyunsaturated fatty acid profiles of lactating and nonlactating women. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 73(6):1074–1079.

Otto SJ, de Groot RH, Hornstra G. 2003. Increased risk of postpartum depressive symptoms is associated with slower normalization after pregnancy of the functional docosahexaenoic acid status. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids 69(4):237–243.

Peat JK. 1998. Asthma: A longitudinal perspective. Journal of Asthma 35(3):235–241.

Peat JK, Mihrshahi S, Kemp AS, Marks GB, Tovey ER, Webb K, Mellis CM, Leeder SR. 2004. Three-year outcomes of dietary fatty acid modification and house dust mite reduction in the Childhood Asthma Prevention Study. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology 114(4):807–813.

People’s League of Health. 1942. Nutrition of expectant and nursing mothers. Lancet 2:10–12.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Putnam JC, Carlson SE, DeVoe PW, Barness LA. 1982. The effect of variations in dietary fatty acids on the fatty acid composition of erythrocyte phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine in human infants. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 36(1):106–114.

Richardson AJ. 2004. Clinical trials of fatty acid treatment in ADHD, dyslexia, dyspraxia and the autistic spectrum. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids 70(4):383–390.

Richardson AJ, Puri BK. 2002. A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the effects of supplementation with highly unsaturated fatty acids on ADHD-related symptoms in children with specific learning difficulties. Progress in Neuropsychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 26(2):233–239.

Sakamoto M, Kubota M, Liu XJ, Murata K, Nakai K, Satoh H. 2004. Maternal and fetal mercury and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids as a risk and benefit of fish consumption to fetus. Environmental Science and Technology 38(14):3860–3863.

Salvig JD, Olsen SF, Secher NJ. 1996. Effects of fish oil supplementation in late pregnancy on blood pressure: A randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 103(6):529–533.

Sanders TA, Naismith DJ. 1979. A comparison of the influence of breast-feeding and bottle-feeding on the fatty acid composition of the erythrocytes. British Journal of Nutrition 41(3):619–623.

SanGiovanni JP, Berkey CS, Dwyer JT, Colditz GA. 2000a. Dietary essential fatty acids, long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids, and visual resolution acuity in healthy fullterm infants: A systematic review. Early Human Development 57(3):165–188.

SanGiovanni JP, Parra-Cabrera S, Colditz GA, Berkey CS, Dwyer JT. 2000b. Meta-analysis of dietary essential fatty acids and long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids as they relate to visual resolution acuity in healthy preterm infants. Pediatrics 105(6):1292–1298.

Satomi H, Minowa M, Hatano S, Nagakura T, Iikura Y. 1994. An epidemiological study of the preventive effect of dietary fish on bronchial asthma. Koshu Eisei In Kenkyu Hokoku/Bulletin of the Institute of Public Health 43(3):305–314.

Schiff E, Ben-Baruch G, Barkai G, Peleg E, Rosenthal T, Mashiach S. 1993. Reduction of thromboxane A2 synthesis in pregnancy by polyunsaturated fatty acid supplements. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 168(1 Part 1):122–124.

Scott DT, Janowsky JS, Carroll RE, Taylor JA, Auestad N, Montalto MB. 1998. Formula supplementation with long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids: Are there developmental benefits? Pediatrics 102(5):E59.

Sibai BM. 1998. Prevention of preeclampsia: A big disappointment. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 179(5):1275–1278.

Simmer K. 2005. Longchain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation in infants born at term. Cochrane Library Issue 2. [Online]. Available: http://www.cochrane.org/cochrane/revabstr/AB000376.htm [accessed October 18, 2005].

Simmer K, Patole S. 2005. Longchain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation in preterm infants. Cochrane Library Issue 2. [Online]. Available: http://www.cochrane.org/cochrane/revabstr/AB000375.htm [accessed October 18, 2005].

Sindelar CA, Scheerger SB, Plugge SL, Eskridge KM, Wander RC, Lewis NM. 2004. Serum lipids of physically active adults consuming omega-3 fatty acid-enriched eggs or conventional eggs. Nutrition Research 24(9):731–739.

Smit HA, Grievink L, Tabak C. 1999. Dietary influences on chronic obstructive lung disease and asthma: A review of the epidemiological evidence. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 58(2):309–319.

Smuts CM, Borod E, Peeples JM, Carlson SE. 2003a. High-DHA eggs: Feasibility as a means to enhance circulating DHA in mother and infant. Lipids 38(4):407–414.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Smuts CM, Huang M, Mundy D, Plasse T, Major S, Carlson SE. 2003b. A randomized trial of docosahexaenoic acid supplementation during the third trimester of pregnancy. Obstetrics and Gynecology 101(3):469–479.

Stevens L, Zhang W, Peck L, Kuczek T, Grevstad N, Nahori A, Zentall SS, Arnold LE, Burgess JR. 2003. EFA Supplementation in children with inattention, hyperactivity, and other disruptive behaviors. Lipids 38(10):1007–1021.

Stevens LJ, Zentall SS, Deck JL, Abate ML, Watkins BA, Lipp SR, Burgess JR. 1995. Essential fatty acid metabolism in boys with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 62(4):761–768.

Takemura Y, Sakurai Y, Honjo S, Tokimatsu, Gibo M, Hara T, Kusakari A, Kugai N. 2002. The relationship between fish intake and the prevalence of asthma: The Tokorozawa childhood asthma and pollinosis study. Preventive Medicine 34(2):221–225.

Timonen M, Horrobin D, Jokelainen J, Laitinen J, Herva A, Rasanen P. 2004. Fish consumption and depression: The Northern Finland 1966 birth cohort study. Journal of Affective Disorders 82(3):447–452.

Troisi RJ, Willett WC, Weiss ST. 1995. A prospective study of diet and adult-onset asthma. American Journal of Respiratory Critical Care 151(5):1401–1408.

Uauy R, Birch DG, Birch EE, Tyson JE, Hoffman. 1990. Effect of dietary omega-3 fatty acids on retinal function of very-low-birth-weight neonates. Pediatric Research 28(5):485–492.

Uauy R, Hoffman DR, Peirano P, Birch DG, Birch EE. 2001. Essential fatty acids in visual and brain development. Lipids 36(9):885–895.

van Wezel-Meijler G, Van Der Knaap MS, Huisman J, Jonkman EJ, Valk J, Lafeber HN. 2002. Dietary supplementation of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in preterm infants: Effects on cerebral maturation. Acta Paediatrica 91(9):942–950.

Velzing-Aarts FV, van der Klis FRM, Muskiet FAJ. 1999. Umbilical vessels of preeclamptic women have low contents of both n-3 and n-6 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 69(2):293–298.

Voigt RG, Llorente M, Jensen CL, Fraley K, Berretta MC, Heird WC. 2001. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of docosahexaenoic acid supplementation in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Pediatrics 139(2):189–196.

Wang YP, Kay HH, Killam AP. 1991. Decreased levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids in pre-eclampsia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 164(3):812–818.

Werkman SH, Carlson SE. 1996. A randomized trial of visual attention of preterm infants fed docosahexaenoic acid until nine months. Lipids 31(1):91–97.

Willatts P, Forsyth JS, DiModugno MK, Varma S, Colvin M. 1998a. Effect of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in infant formula on problem solving at 10 months of age. Lancet 352(9129):688–691.

Willatts P, Forsyth JS, DiModugno MK, Varma S, Colvin M. 1998b. Influence of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids on infant cognitive function. Lipids 33(10):973–980.

Willatts P, Forsyth S, Mires G, Ross P. 2003. Maternal DHA status in late pregnancy is related to infant look duration and acuity at age 4 months. Poster presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Tampa, FL.

Williams MA, Zingheim RW, King IB, Zebelman AM. 1995. Omega-3 fatty acids in maternal erythrocytes and risk of preeclampsia. Epidemiology 6(3):232–237.

Williams C, Birch EE, Emmett PM, Northstone K. 2001. Stereoacuity at age 3.5 y in children born full-term is associated with prenatal and postnatal dietary factors: A report from a population-based cohort study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 73(2):316–322.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Studies on Adult Chronic Diseases

TABLE B-2a Secondary Prevention Studies with Cardiovascular Outcomes

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Hooper et al., 2006

Meta-analysis

48 randomized controlled trials

41 cohorts

Omega-3 intake for ≥6 months in adults

Primary and secondary prevention

n-3 supplement

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

High omega-3 fat vs. low omega-3 fat/control

Intake differed by 0.1-0.6 g omega-3/day among the two groups (absolute levels not specified)

Based on RCTs, no significant differences were found between the high omega-3 fat group and the low omega-3 fat/control group with regards to risk of mortality (n=15 RCTs; RR=0.87, 95% CI 0.73-1.03), cardiovascular events (n=18 RCTs; RR=0.95, 95% CI 0.82-1.12), cancer or death from cancer (n=10 RCTs; RR=1.07, 95% CI 0.88-1.30), or stroke (n=9 RCTs; RR=1.17, 95% CI 0.91-1.51).

Based on cohorts, no significant differences were found between the high omega-3 fat group and the low omega-3 fat/control group with regards to risk of cardiovascular events (n=7 cohorts; RR=0.91, 95% CI 0.73-1.13), cancer or death from cancer (n=7 cohorts; RR=1.02, 95% CI 0.87-1.19), or stroke (n=4 cohorts; RR=0.87, 95% CI 0.72-1.04).

Based on three cohorts, those in the low omega-3 fat/control group had a significantly higher risk of mortality compared to those in the high omega-3 fat group (RR=0.65, 95% CI 0.48-0.88).

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Hooper et al., 2005

Cochrane Review

48 randomized controlled trials

41 cohorts

Primary and secondary prevention

n-3 supplement or advice

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

 

Based on RCTs, no significant differences were found between those randomized to n-3 supplementation or advice and those not randomized to n-3 supplementation or advice with regards to total mortality (n=44 RCTs; RR=0.87, 95% CI 0.73-1.03), combined cardiovascular events (n=31 RCTs; RR=0.95, 95% CI 0.82-1.12), cancers (n=10 RCTs; RR=1.07, 95% CI 0.88-1.30), cardiovascular deaths (n=44 RCTs; RR=0.85, 95% CI 0.68-1.06), fatal myocardial infarction (n=38 RCTs; RR=0.86, 95% CI 0.60-1.25), non-fatal myocardial infarction (n=26 RCTs; RR=1.03, 95% CI 0.70-1.50), sudden death (n=37 RCTs; RR=0.85, 95% CI 0.49-1.48), angina (n=25 RCTs; RR=0.78, 95% CI 0.59-1.02), stroke (n=26 RCTs; RR=1.17, 95% CI 0.91-1.51), heart failure (n=20 RCTs; RR=0.51, 95% CI 0.31-0.85), peripheral vascular events (n=17 RCTs; RR=0.26, 95% CI 0.07-1.06), and re-vascularization (n=23 RCTs; RR=1.05, 95% CI 0.97-1.12).

Based on cohort studies, no significant differences were found between those randomized to n-3 supplementation or advice and those not randomized to n-3 supplementation or advice with regards to combined cardiovascular events (n=7 cohorts; RR=0.91, 95% CI 0.73-1.13), cancers (n=10 cohorts; RR=1.02, 95% CI 0.87-1.19), nonfatal myocardial infarction (n=4 cohorts; RR=0.93, 95% CI 0.69-1.26), stroke (n=4 cohorts; RR=0.87, 95% CI 0.72-1.04), peripheral vascular events (n=1 cohort; RR=0.94, 95% CI 0.84-1.04), and revascularization (n=2 cohorts; RR=1.07, 95% CI 0.76-1.50).

Based on cohort studies, significant differences were found between those randomized to n-3 supplementation or advice and those not randomized to n-3 supplementation or advice with regards to total mortality (n=3 cohorts; RR=0.65, 95% CI 0.48-0.88), cardiovascular deaths (n=11 cohorts; RR=0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99), fatal myocardial infarction (n=2 cohorts; RR=0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.82), and sudden death (n=1 cohort; RR=0.44, 95% CI 0.21-0.91).

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Konig et al., 2005

Meta-analysis

7 observational studies (primary prevention)

4 RCTs (secondary prevention)

Seafood

Burr et al., 2005

Review

Review of two randomized controlled trials (Burr et al., 1989, 2003 below)

Secondary prevention

Dietary advice

Harper and Jacobson, 2005

Review

Systematic literature review of 14 randomized controlled trials

Northern Europe, Southern Europe, India

Excluded if trial involved >1 intervention unless in a prospective 2×2 design

Patients followed for ≥1 year

Secondary prevention

6 on fish oil

2 on fish

5 on ALA suppl.

2 on ALA-enriched diets

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Servings/week, a continuous number

1 serving = 100 g

Among those with no preexisting CHD (from observational studies), the linear regression model showed that each one serving increase in fish consumption per week reduces one’s risk of CHD death by 0.039 (95% CI −0.066 to −0.011) but does not significantly change one’s risk of nonfatal MI by (ΔRR=0.0083, 95% CI −0.012 to 0.028)

“The information available is insufficient for the purposes of quantitatively analyzing the impact of fish consumption on CHD risk for individuals with preexisting CHD” (from RCTs).

B

See Burr et al., 1989, 2003 below

“It appeared that fish oil, which protected post-MI male patients in DART, increased the risk of cardiac death in men with angina, being particularly associated with sudden death.”

“The apparently conflicting findings may be attributable to the different clinical conditions of the subjects … together with different effects of dietary fish and fish oil.”

N

 

“The evidence supports a role for fish oil (EPA or DHA) or fish in secondary prevention, because the clinical trials have demonstrated a reduction in total mortality, CHD death, and sudden death.”

“Evidence from these trials had indicated that EPA plus DHA supplementation in the range of 0.5-1.8 g/day provides significant benefit.”

“The data on the plant-based n-3 PUFA, ALA, is very promising. However, the existing studies were small, and a large randomized controlled trial is needed before recommendations can be definitely made for CHD prevention.”

“The data for ALA show possible reductions in sudden death and nonfatal myocardial infarction, suggesting other potential cardioprotective mechanisms other than a predominately antiarrhythmic role.”

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Leaf et al., 2005

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men and women (n=402)

Mean age about 65 years

18 US centers

Had a cardioverter defibrillator implanted because of a history of cardiac arrest, sustained ventricular tachycardia, or syncope with inductive, sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation during electrophysiologic studies

Follow-up of 12 months

Secondary prevention

n-3 supplement

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Treatment:

Four 1 g gelatin capsules of an ethyl ester concentrate of n-3 fatty acids (2.6 g EPA+DHA)

Placebo:

Four 1 g capsules of olive oil

After controlling for sex, left ventricular ejection fraction (continuous), New York Heart Association class III congestive heart failure, history of myocardial infarction, history of prior defibrillator therapies for ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation, time from implanted cardioverter/defibrillator implant (continuous), and sustained ventricular tachycardia as the indication for the implanted cardioverter defibrillator:

The intent-to-treat analysis provided a significant relative risk of time to first event of 0.67 (95% CI 0.47-0.95, p=0.024) for all confirmed events among those in the treatment group compared to the placebo group;

The on-treatment analysis (for all who had taken any of their prescribed supplements) provided a significant relative risk of time to first event of 0.67 (95% CI 0.46-0.98, p=0.037) for all confirmed events among those in the treatment group compared to the placebo group; and

The on-treatment analysis (for all on-treatment at least 11 months) provided a significant relative risk of time to first event of 0.52 (95% CI 0.32-0.83, p=0.0060) for all confirmed events among those in the treatment group compared to the placebo group.

Similar results were found when probable events were also included.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Raitt et al., 2005

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men and women (n=200)

Mean age about 62

Patients at six medical centers in the United States

Receiving an implantable cardioverter defibrillator for an electrocardiogram-documented episode of sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation that was not the result of acute myocardial infarction or a revisible cause or who had a preexisting implantable cardioverter defibrillator and had received implantable cardioverter/defibrillator therapy for an electrocardiogram-documented episode of sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation within the last 3 months

No class I or class II antiarrhythmic medications; ≥1 fatty fish meal/week; flaxseed oil, cod-liver oil, or fish-oil supplements in the last month

Follow-up of 2 years

Secondary prevention

n-3 supplement

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Treatment:

1.8 g/day fish oil (42% EPA and 30% DHA)

Placebo:

Olive oil (73% oleic acid, 12% palmitic acid, 0% EPA+DHA)

There was a significant difference in the number of patients hospitalized for neurological conditions among those assigned to the placebo compared to those assigned to the treatment (p=0.04). However, there were no other significant differences found in mortality, hospitalizations, coronary revascularization, myocardial infarction, cancer, and diarrhea between the two groups.

There were no significant differences in the time to first episode of implantable cardioverter/defibrillator therapy for ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation after randomization between the two groups (p=0.19). However, among those with qualified arrhythmia at the time of study entry, those assigned to fish oil had significantly greater incidence of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation treated by the implantable cardioverter defibrillator compared to those assigned to placebo (p=0.007).

A

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Baer et al., 2004

Randomized Crossover Trial

Men (n=50)

Aged 25-60 years

All races

Beltsville, MD

In good health, with no hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, gout, liver or kidney disease, or endocrine disorders

Fasting plasma HDL-c >0.65 mmol/L, triacylglycerol <3.39 mmol/L, and 85-120% of their sex-specific ideal BMI

No lipid-lowering drugs, blood pressure medication, or dietary supplements, or eating habits inconsistent with the study protocol

30-week intervention (six diets for 5 weeks each)

Primary prevention

Diet

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Diets 1-5: 38.9% energy from fat, 15% energy from protein, 46.1% energy from digestible carbohydrates

Diet 6: 30.4% energy from fat, 54.6% energy from carbohydrate

Diet 1 (carbohydrate diet): 8.5% of energy from fat replaced by digestible carbohydrate

Diet 2 (oleic acid diet): 8% of energy enriched with oleic acid

Diet 3 (LMP diet): 8% of energy enriched with lauric (L), myristic (M), and palmitic (P) acids

Diet 4 (stearic acid diet): 8% of energy enriched with stearic acid

Diet 5 (trans fatty acid diet): 8% of energy enriched with trans fatty acids

Diet 6 (trans fatty acid + stearic acid diet): 4% energy enriched with trans fatty acids and 4% of energy enriched with stearic acid

After 5 weeks on the stearic acid diet, the least squares mean plasma fibrinogen levels were significantly higher than after 5 weeks on all other diets (p<0.05).

After 5 weeks on the trans fatty acid diet, the least squares mean plasma C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher than after 5 weeks on all other diets (p<0.05).

After 5 weeks on the oleic acid diet, the least squares mean plasma interleukin 6 levels were significantly lower than after 5 weeks on all other diets, except for the trans fatty acid + stearic acid diet (p<0.05).

After 5 weeks on the trans fatty acids diet, the least squares mean plasma C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher than after 5 weeks on the carbohydrate diet, the oleic diet, and the trans fatty acid + stearic acid diet (p<0.05).

After 5 weeks on the oleic acid diet, the least squares mean plasma interleukin 6 levels were significantly lower than after 5 weeks on the trans fatty acid diet, stearic acid diet, or the LMP diet (p<0.05).

After 5 weeks on the oleic acid diet, the least squares mean plasma E-selectin levels were significantly lower than after 5 weeks on all other diets, except for the carbohydrate diet (p<0.05).

After 5 weeks on the trans fatty acids diet, the least squares mean plasma E-selectin levels were significantly higher than after 5 weeks on all other diets (p<0.05).

There were no other significant differences reported between the diets with regards to fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, or E-selectin levels.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Burr et al., 2003

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men (n=3114)

Aged <70 years

South Wales, UK

Being treated with angina

Mortality ascertained at 3-9 years after enrollment

No exertional chest pain or discomfort; men awaiting coronary artery by-pass surgery, men who already ate oily fish twice a week, men who could not tolerate oily fish or fish oil, men who appeared to be unsuitable on other grounds (e.g., other serious illness, likelihood of moving out of area)

The Diet and Angina Randomized Trial (DART 2)

Follow-up of 3 years (after last subject was recruited)

Secondary prevention

Dietary advice

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Fish advice = eat at least 2 portions of oily fish each week or take up to 3 g of fish oil as a partial or total substitute

Fruit/vegetable advice = eat 4-5 portions of fruit and vegetables and drink at least 1 glass of natural orange juice daily, and also increase the intake of oats

Both = a combination of both of these forms of advice

Sensible eating = non-specific advice that did not include either form of advice

Those given fish advice had significantly higher percentage of cardiac deaths (p=0.02) and sudden deaths (p=0.02) compared to those who did not receive fish advice. There was not a significant difference in the number of total deaths between these two groups.

No significant differences were found between the fruit/vegetable advice group and the no fruit/vegetable advice group for total number of deaths, number of cardiac deaths, or number of sudden deaths.

After adjusting for age, smoking, previous MI, history of high blood pressure, diabetes, BMI, serum cholesterol, medication, and fruit advice or fish advice:

Those who received fish advice had a slightly significant higher hazard ratio for cardiac deaths (HR=1.26, p=0.047) and a significant higher hazard ratio for sudden death (HR=1.54, p=0.025), compared to those who did not receive fish advice.

There were no significant associations found between those who received fruit/vegetable advice vs. those who did not and all deaths, cardiac deaths, or sudden deaths.

A

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Marchioli et al., 2002

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men and women (n=11,323)

No age limits

Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravivivenza nell’Infarto miocardico-Prevenzione (GISSI trial)

Recent MI

Follow-up of 3.5 years (about 38,418 person-years)

Secondary prevention

n-3 supplement

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

n-3 fatty acids group = 1 g/day

Vitamin E group = 300 mg/day

Combination group

Control group

After adjusting for age, sex, complications after myocardial infarction, smoking habits, history of diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension, total blood cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, fibrinogen, leukocyte count, and claudication intermittens:

Those who received n-3 fatty acids had a significantly lower relative risk of death, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal stroke at 9 months, 12 months, and 42 months of follow-up than the controls (RR=0.76, 95% CI 0.60-0.97 at 9 months, RR=0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.98 at 12 months, and RR=0.85, 95% CI 0.74-0.98 at 42 months). The relative risks at 3 and 6 months of follow-up were also lower in the n-3 fatty acid group compared to the controls, but they were not significant.

Those who received n-3 fatty acids had a significantly lower relative risk of CVD death, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal stroke at 9 months (RR=0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.97), 12 months (RR=0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.99), and 42 months (RR=0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.94) of follow-up than the controls. The relative risks at 3 and 6 months of follow-up were also lower in the n-3 fatty acid group compared to the controls, but they were not significant.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Ness et al., 2002

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men (n=2033)

Aged <70 years

21 hospitals in south Wales and southwest England

Survived an MI

Diet and Reinfarction Trial (DART)

21,147 person-years of follow-up

Secondary prevention

Dietary advice

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Fish advice = eat at least 2 portions of fatty fish each week and as much other fish as they could manage (using fish oil capsule as a partial or total replacement if necessary)

Fat advice = aimed at reducing total fat and increasing the polyunsaturated to saturated fat ratio

Fiber advice = eat at least 6 slices of wholemeal bread per day or an equivalent amount of cereal fiber

After adjusting for myocardial infarction, angina, hypertension at baseline; x-ray evidence of cardiomegaly, pulmonary congestion or pulmonary edema at baseline; and treatment with β-blockers, other anti-hypertensives, digoxin/antiarrhythmics, or anticoagulants:

Those who received fish advice had a significantly lower hazard ratio for all-cause mortality at 0-2 years of follow-up (HR=0.73, 95% CI 0.56-0.95) and a significantly higher hazard ratio at 2-5 years of follow-up (HR=1.31, 95% CI 1.01-1.71) compared to those who did not receive fish advice. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups and all-cause mortality after 5 years of follow-up;

Those who received fish advice had a significantly lower hazard ratio for coronary heart disease at 0-2 years of follow-up (HR=0.68, 95% CI 0.51-0.91) compared to those who did not receive fish advice. After 2 years of follow-up, there were no significant differences between the two groups and their risk of coronary heart disease; and

There were no significant differences between those who received fish advice vs. those who did not and risk of stroke throughout 10 years of follow-up.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Nilsen et al., 2001

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men and women (n=300)

Aged >18 years

Central Hospital in Rogaland, Stavanger, Norway

Suffered from acute MI

Discontinued regular supplementation of other fish oil products

No assumed noncompliance; expected survival <2 years because of severe heart failure; ongoing gastrointestinal bleeding or verified stomach ulcer; thrombocytopenia or blood platelets <100×109/L; liver insufficiency; participation in any other study; residence outside the recruitment area

Mean follow-up time of 1.5 years

Secondary prevention

n-3 supplement

GISSI Investigators, 1999*

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men and women (n=11,324)

No age limits

Recent MI (≤3 months)

No contraindications to the dietary supplements; were able to provide informed written consent, had no unfavorable short-term outlook (e.g., overt congestive heart failure, cancer, etc.)

42 months of follow-up

Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravivivenza nell’Infarto miocardico-Prevenzione (GISSI trial)

Secondary prevention

n-3 supplement

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Fish oil = 850-880 mg EPA+DHA/capsule

Control = same amount in corn oil

2 capsules twice a day

When compared to the corn oil group, there were no significant associations found between fish oil and fatal cardiac events and resuscitations, nonfatal cardiac events, revascularization, total mortality, time to first event, or cardiac event or revascularization.

N

n-3 PUFA alone vs. vitamin E alone vs. combination of the two vs. no supplement (control)

Absolute amounts not specified

In the four-way analysis, those who received n-3 PUFA had a significantly lower relative risk of death, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal stroke (RR=0.85, 95% CI 0.74-0.98) and cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal stroke (RR=0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.95) compared to the controls.

In the four-way analysis, those who received n-3 PUFA had a significantly lower relative risk of all fatal events (RR=0.80, 95% CI 0.67-0.94), all cardiovascular deaths (RR=0.70, 95% CI 0.56-0.87), cardiac death (RR=0.65, 95% CI 0.51-0.82), coronary death (RR=0.65, 95% CI 0.51-0.84), and sudden death (RR=0.55, 95% CI 0.40-0.76).

Similar results were also found in the two-way analysis.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Singh et al., 1997

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men and women (n=360)

Mean age of 48.5 years

Admitted to the Medical Hospital and Research Center, Moradabad

Clinical diagnosis of acute MI in the preceding 24 hours

Indian Experiment of Infarct Survival (IEIS-4)

Secondary prevention

n-3 supplement

Burr et al., 1989

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men (n=2033)

Aged <70 years

South Wales, UK

From those admitted to 21 hospitals for acute MI

No diabetes, those awaiting cardiac surgery, or those who already intended to eat one of the intervention diets

2 years of follow-up

The Diet and Reinfarction Trial (DART)

Follow-up of 2 years

Secondary prevention

Dietary advice

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Fish oil = 1.08 g/day EPA + 0.72 g/day DHA

Mustard oil = 2.9 g/day ALA

Placebo = 100 mg/day aluminum hydroxide

Compared to the placebo group, those in the fish oil group had significantly lower relative risks of angina pectoris (RR=0.42, 95% CI 0.22-0.77), total arrhythmias (RR=0.46, 95% CI 0.21-0.98), total cases with poor left ventricular function (RR=0.48, 95% CI 0.28-0.82), NYHA class III and IV heart failure (RR=0.44, 95% CI 0.18-0.88), and total cardiac events (RR=0.70, 95% CI 0.29-0.90).

Compared to the placebo group, the fish oil group also had lower relative risks of ventricular ectopic beats (>8/minute and >3 consecutively), left ventricular enlargement, hypotension, sudden cardiac death, total cardiac death, and nonfatal reinfarction, but these were not significant.

Serious concerns have been raised about the performance and conclusions of this trial and other related publications by this investigator.

B

Fat advice = reduce fat to 30% of total energy and increase polyunsaturated to saturated ratio to 1.0

Fish advice = consume at least 2 weekly portions of 200-400 g fatty fish (or 0.15 g of MaxEPA capsules daily if one could not tolerate fish)

Fiber advice = increase intake of cereal fiber to 18 g daily

Total mortality and IHD mortality was significantly lower in the fish advice group than in the non-fish advice group (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively).

There were no significant differences in nonfatal MI or IHD events in the fish advice group and the non-fish advice group.

There were no significant differences in total mortality, IHD deaths, nonfatal MI, or IHD events between the fat advice group and the non-fat advice group or between the fiber advice group and the non-fiber advice group.

After controlling for history of MI, angina, or hypertension; X-ray evidence of cardiomegaly, pulmonary congestion, or pulmonary edema; and treatment (at entry) with β-blockers, other antihypertensives, digoxin/antiarrhythmics, or anticoagulants; those in the fish advice group had a significantly lower relative risk of all deaths than those not in the fish advice group (p<0.05); similar results were also found in the unadjusted comparison.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

He et al., 2004b

Meta-analysis

13 cohort studies from 11 independent studies

English language

222,364 participants

3032 coronary heart disease deaths

Average of 11.8 years of follow-up

Primary prevention

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Categories of fish intake:

1 = Never-<1 time/month

2 = 1-3 times/month

3 = 1 time/week

4 = 2-4 times/week

5 = ≥5 times/week

Based on pooled relative risks of CHD mortality, those who ate fish 1 time/week, 2-4 times/week, and ≥5 times/week had significantly lower risk of CHD mortality than those who never ate fish (RR=0.85, 95% CI 0.76-0.96; RR=0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.89; RR=0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.82, respectively). Those who ate fish 1-3 times/month also had a lower relative risk compared to those who never ate fish, but it was not significant (RR=0.89, 95% CI 0.79-1.01).

“Each 20-g/day increase in fish intake was related to a 7% lower risk of CHD mortality (p for trend = 0.03).”

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Whelton et al., 2004

Meta-analysis

14 cohort studies

5 case-control studies

Conducted in adult humans

English language

Published before May 2003

Primary and secondary prevention

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Consumed fish on a regular basis vs. consumed little or no fish

Level of fish consumption: <2, 2-<4, ≥4 portions per week

In 6 cohort studies, those consuming any amount of fish had a significantly lower risk of coronary heart disease mortality compared to those who ate no fish; in seven cohort studies no significant associations were found between fish consumption and coronary heart disease mortality.

Based on pooled estimates from a random-effects model, those who ate any fish (pooled RR=0.83, 95% CI 0.76-0.90), those who ate <2 portions of fish/week (pooled RR=0.83, 95% CI 0.75-0.92), and those who ate 2-<4 portions of fish/week (pooled RR=0.75, 95% CI 0.62-0.92) had a significantly lower risk of coronary heart disease mortality compared to those who ate no fish; a significant difference was not found between those who ate ≥4 portions of fish/week and those who never ate fish.

In one cohort study and five case-control studies those consuming any amount of fish had a significantly lower risk of total coronary heart disease compared to those who ate no fish; in one cohort study, those who ate fish had a significantly higher risk of total coronary heart disease compared to those who ate no fish (RR≈1.8, 95% CI 1.2-3.2); in five cohort studies no significant associations were found between fish consumption and total coronary heart disease.

Based on pooled estimates from a random-effects model, those who ate any fish (pooled RR=0.86, 95% CI 0.81-0.92), those who ate <2 portions of fish/week (pooled RR=0.85, 95% CI 0.80-0.91), and those who ate 2-<4 portions of fish/week (pooled RR=0.83, 95% CI 0.69-0.99) had a significantly lower risk of total coronary heart disease compared to those who ate no fish; a significant difference was not found between those who ate ≥4 portions of fish/week and those who never ate fish.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Calder, 2004

Review

Primary and secondary prevention studies in humans (n=25)

Seafood or n-3 supplement

Marckmann and Gronbaek, 1999

Review

Prospective cohort studies (n=9)

Letter (n=1)

Short report (n=1)

Sample size and length of follow-up varied between studies

Primary prevention

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

 

“Substantial evidence from epidemiological and case-control studies indicates that consumption of fish, fatty fish, and long-chain n-3 PUFAs reduces the risk of cardiovascular mortality.”

“Secondary prevention studies using long-chain n-3 PUFAs in patients post-myocardial infarction have shown a reduction in total and cardiovascular mortality.”

“Long-chain n-3 PUFAs have been shown to decrease blood triacylglycerol (triglyceride) concentrations, to decrease production of chemoattractants, growth factors, adhesion molecules, inflammatory eicosanoids and inflammatory cytokines, to lower blood pressure, to increase nitric oxide production, endothelial relaxation and vascular compliance, to decrease thrombosis and cardiac arrhythmias and to increase heart rate variability.”

B

 

Both Krohout (1985) and Daviglus (1997) showed a significant inverse relationship between fish intake (g/day) and risk of coronary heart disease (p for trend <0.05 and p for trend = 0.04, respectively).

“Our overall conclusion is that individuals at low risk of CHD and with healthy lifestyles do not gain any additional protection against CHD from eating fish. On the other hand, high-risk individuals appear to benefit in a dose-dependent manner from increasing their fish consumption up to an optimum of 40-60 g.”

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Iso et al., 2006

Cohort

Men (n=19,985)

Women (n=21,593)

Aged 40-59 years

Japan (Iwate Prefecture, Akita, Nagano, Okinawa)

The Japan Public Health Center-based Study Cohort I

No myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, stroke, or cancer at baseline

477,325 person-years of follow-up

Primary prevention

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

One serving = 100 g for fresh fish, 20 g for dried or salted fish, 20 g for salted fish roe, 20 g for salted fish preserves

n-3 amounts per serving = 1.22 g for fresh fish and shellfish, 0.40 g for dried fish, 0.52 g for salted eggs, and 0.11 g for salted fish gut

Quintiles of fish and n-3 intakes:

1 (low) = mean of 23 g/day

2 = mean of 51 g/day

3 = mean of 78 g/day

4 = mean of 114 g/day

5 (high) = mean of 180 g/day

After adjusting for age; sex; cigarette smoking; alcohol intake; BMI; histories of hypertension and diabetes; medication use for hypercholesterolemia; education level; sports at leisure time; quintiles of dietary intake of fruits, vegetables, saturated fat, monounsaturated fat, n-6 polyunsaturated fat, cholesterol; total energy; and public health center:

Those in the 5th quintile of fish intake had a significantly lower HR of definite MI (HR=0.44, 95% CI 0.24-0.81) and nonfatal coronary events (HR=0.43, 95% CI 0.23-0.81) than those in the 1st quintile. Those in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quintiles also had lower hazard ratios of definite MI and nonfatal coronary events, but they were not significant;

No significant associations were found between quintiles of fish intake and coronary heart disease, total MI, sudden cardiac death, or fatal coronary events;

Those in the 5th quintile of n-3 intake had significantly lower HRs of coronary heart disease (HR=0.58, 95% CI 0.35-0.97), total MI (HR=0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.78), definite MI (HR=0.35, 95% CI 0.18-0.66), and nonfatal coronary heart disease (HR=0.33, 95% CI 0.17-0.63) than those in the 1st quintile;

Those in the 4th quintile of n-3 intake had a significantly lower HR of nonfatal coronary events (HR=0.57, 95% CI 0.34-0.98) than those in the 1st quintile. However, there were no significant associations found between n-3 intake and coronary heart disease, total MI, or definite MI, sudden cardiac death, or fatal coronary events when comparing the 4th quintile to the 1st quintile; and

Those in the 3rd quintile of n-3 intake had significantly lower HRs of definite MI (HR=0.59, 95% CI 0.37-0.94) and nonfatal coronary events (HR=0.61, 95% CI 0.38-0.97) than those in the 1st quintile. However, there were no significant associations found between n-3 intake and coronary heart disease, total MI, sudden cardiac death, or fatal coronary events when comparing the 3rd quintile to the 1st quintile.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Mozaffarian et al., 2004

Cohort

Men and women (n=4815)

Aged ≥65 years

From Medicare eligibility lists in 4 US communities

Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS)

Free of atrial fibrillation at baseline

Follow-up of 12 years

Primary prevention

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Categories of fish intake (tuna/other or fried fish/fish sandwich):

1 = <1 time/month

2 = 1-3 times/month

3 = 1-4 times/week

4 = ≥5 times/week

After adjusting for age, gender, race, education, diabetes, BMI, prevalent coronary heart disease, prevalent valvular heart disease, smoking status, pack-years of smoking, leisure-time activity, total caloric intake, alcohol, saturated fat, beef/pork, fruits, vegetables, cereal fiber, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, left ventricular systolic function at baseline, treated hypertension, C-reactive protein:

Those who ate tuna/other fish 1-4 times/week or ≥5 times/week had significantly lower HR of atrial fibrillation than those who ate tuna/ other fish <1 time/month (HR=0.72, 95% CI 0.57-0.90 and HR=0.70, 95% CI 0.53-0.93, respectively).

Those who ate tuna/other fish 1-3 times/month also had a lower HR of atrial fibrillation than those who ate tuna/other fish <1 time/month, but it was not significant.

There was no significant association found between fried fish/fish sandwich intake and the risk of atrial fibrillation.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Mozaffarian et al., 2003

Cohort

Men and women (n=3910)

Aged ≥65 years

From Medicare eligibility lists in 4 US communities

Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS)

Free from CVD at baseline

Follow-up of 9.3 years

Primary prevention

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Categories of fish intake (tuna/other or fried fish/fish sandwich):

1 = <1 time/month

2 = 1-3 times/month

3 = 1 time/week

4 = 2 times/week

5 = ≥3 times/week

After adjusting for age, gender, education, diabetes, current smoking, pack-years of smoking, BMI, systolic blood pressure, LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides, C-reactive protein, and intake of saturated fat, alcohol, beef/pork, fruits, and vegetables:

Those who ate tuna/other fish 2 times/week and ≥3 times/week had a significantly lower RR of total IHD death than those who ate tuna/other fish <1 time/month (RR=0.53, 95% CI 0.30-0.96 and RR=0.47, 95% CI 0.27-0.82, respectively). Those who ate tuna/other fish 1-3 times/month and 1 time/week also had lower RR of total IHD death compared to those who ate tuna/other fish <1 time/month, but they were not significant;

Those who ate tuna/other fish ≥3 times/week had a significantly lower RR of arrhythmic IHD death than those who ate tuna/other fish <1 time/month (RR=0.32, 95% CI 0.15-0.70). The other categories of intake also showed lower RR of arrhythmic IHD death compared to the 1st category of intake but they were not significant; and

There were no significant associations found between tuna/other fish intake and nonfatal MI and between fried fish/fish sandwiches and total IHD death, arrhythmic IHD death, or nonfatal MI.

After adjusting for age, gender, education, diabetes, current smoking, and pack-years of smoking:

Those who ate tuna/other fish ≥3 times/week had a significantly lower RR of total IHD death and arrhythmic IHD death than those who ate tuna/other fish <1 time/month (RR=0.51, 95% CI 0.31-0.83 and RR=0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.84, respectively). There were no other significant associations found between the other categories of tuna/other fish intake and the risk of death from total IHD, arrhythmic IHD, or nonfatal MI; and

Those who ate fried fish/fish sandwiches ≥3 times/week had a significantly higher RR of nonfatal MI death than those who ate fried fish/fish sandwiches <1 time/month (RR=2.30, 95% CI 1.18-4.46). There were no other significant associations found between the other categories of fried fish/fish sandwich intake and the risk of death from total IHD, arrhythmic IHD, or nonfatal MI.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Osler et al., 2003

Cohort

Men (n=4513)

Women (n=3984)

Aged 30-70 years

Copenhagen County, Denmark general population

MONICA 1 = born in 1922, 1932, 1942, or 1952; examined in 1982

MONICA 2 = born in 1927, 1937, 1947, or 1957; examined in 1987

MONICA 3 = born in 1922, 1932, 1942, 1952, or 1962; examined in 1992

No CHD in the preceding 5 years before enrollment (fatal or nonfatal CHD as an end point)

52,607 person-years of follow-up for men

48,596 person-years of follow-up for women

Primary prevention

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Categories of fish intake:

1 = Never

2 = ≤1 time/month

3 = 2 times/month

4 = 1 time/week

5 = ≥2 times/week

After adjusting for smoking status, physical activity, alcohol, educational status, healthy diet score, total cholesterol, total cholesterol, BMI:

Those who consumed fish 2 times/month had a significant lower HR of all-cause mortality compared to those who ate fish 1 time/week (HR=0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.96).

No other significant differences were found between categories of fish consumption and all-cause mortality, CHD mortality and morbidity, and CHD mortality.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Hu et al., 2002

Cohort

Women (n=84,688)

Aged 30-55 years

Nurses living in the United States

Nurses’ Health Study

Exclude those who left 10 or more items blank on the dietary questionnaire, those with reported total food intakes judged to be implausible, and those who had a history of cancer, angina, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke, or other cardiovascular disease at baseline

Follow-up of 16 years

Primary prevention

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Serving sizes:

Dark-meat fish = 3-5 oz (1.51 g EPA/DHA)

Canned tuna = 3-4 oz (0.42 g EPA/DHA)

Other fish = 3-5 oz (0.48 g EPA/DHA)

Shrimp/lobster/scallops = 3.5 oz (0.32 g EPA/DHA)

Categories of fish intake:

1 = <1 time/month

2 = 1-3 times/month

3 = 1 time/week

4 = 2-4 times/week

5 = ≥5 times/week

After adjusting for age, time periods, smoking status, BMI, alcohol intake, menopausal status and postmenopausal hormone use, vigorous to moderate activity, number of times aspirin was used per week, multivitamin use, vitamin E supplement use, history of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, and intake of transfat, the ratio of polyunsaturated fat to saturated fat, and dietary fiber:

Those in categories 2-5 of fish intake all had significantly lower RR of coronary heart disease compared to those in category 1 (RR=0.79, 95%CI 0.64-0.97; RR=0.72, 95% CI 0.59-0.88; RR=0.72, 95% CI 0.57-0.91; RR=0.69, 95% CI 0.52-0.93, respectively) (p for trend = 0.007);

Those in categories 3 and 5 of fish intake had significantly lower RR of fatal CHD compared to those in category 1 (RR=0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.91 and RR=0.55, 95% CI 0.33-0.91, respectively). Those in categories 2 and 4 also had lower RRs but they were not significant (p for trend = 0.01); and

Those in categories 3 and 4 had significantly lower RR of nonfatal MI compared to those in category 1 (RR=0.75, 95% CI 0.59-0.96 and RR=0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.96, respectively). Those in categories 2 and 5 also had lower RRs but they were not significant (p for trend = 0.10); and

Similar results were found when the model did not also adjust for intake of transfat, the ratio of polyunsaturated fat to saturated fat, and dietary fiber.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Nagata et al., 2002

Cohort

Men (n=13,355)

Women (n=15,724)

Aged 35 years or older

Takayama, Gifu, Japan

No history of cancer, stroke, or ischemic heart disease

Follow-up of 7 years (201,160 person-years)

Primary prevention

Seafood or n-3 supplement

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Quintiles of fish intake (median g/day):

Quintile 1 = 46.2 for men, 36.6 for women

Quintile 2 = 68.1 for men, 53.9 for women

Quintile 3 = 86.8 for men, 68.8 for women

Quintile 4 = 111.9 for men, 88.1 for women

Quintile 5 = 157.8 for men, 122.4 for women

Quintiles of fish oil intake (medium mg/day):

Quintile 1 = 410 for men, 332 for women

Quintile 2 = 602 for men, 486 for women

Quintile 3 = 788 for men, 635 for women

Quintile 4 = 1051 for men, 832 for women

Quintile 5 = 1582 for men, 1253 for women

After adjusting for age, total energy intake, marital status, BMI, smoking status, alcohol intake, coffee intake, exercise, and history of hypertension and diabetes mellitus:

There were no significant associations between quintiles of fish intake and risk of all-cause mortality among men or women;

Men in the 2nd quintile of fish oil intake had a significantly lower HR of all-cause mortality than men in the 1st quintile of fish oil intake (HR=0.82, 95% CI 0.67-0.99). Men in the higher quintiles of fish oil intake also had lower HR of all-cause mortality compared to men in the 1st quintile of fish oil intake, but they were not significant; and

Women in the 5th quintile of fish oil intake had a significantly lower HR of all-cause mortality than women in the 1st quintile of fish oil intake (HR=0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.94). Women in the other quintiles of fish oil intake also had lower HR of all-cause mortality compared to women in the 1st quintile of fish oil intake, but they were not significant.

There were no significant associations found between quintiles of fish oil intake and cardiovascular disease mortality among men or women.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Yuan et al., 2001

Cohort

Men (n=18,244)

Aged 45-64 years

Shanghai, China

No history of cancer

Follow-up of 12 years (179,466 person-years)

Primary prevention

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Fresh fish = 0.57 g n-3 fatty acids/100 g

Salted fish = 0.44 g n-3 fatty acids/100 g

Shellfish = 0.36 g n-3 fatty acids/100 g

Fish and shellfish categories (g/week):

1 = <50 (<1 serving/week)

2 = 50-<100 (1 serving/week)

3 = 100-<150 (2 servings/week)

4 = 150-<200 (3 servings/week)

5 = ≥200 (≥4 servings/week)

Quintiles of n-3 fatty acid intake (g/week):

1 = <0.27

2 = 0.27-0.43

3 = 0.44-0.72

4 = 0.73-1.09

5 = ≥1.10

After controlling for age, total energy intake, level of education, BMI, current smoker at recruitment, average number of cigarettes smoked/day, number of alcoholic drinks consumed/week, history of diabetes, and history of hypertension:

Those in the 2nd and 5th categories of fish/shellfish intake had significantly lower RR of acute myocardial infarction mortality than those in the 1st category (RR=0.55, 95% CI 0.33-0.91 and RR=0.41, 95% CI 0.22-0.78, respectively) (p for trend = 0.03). Similar results were found for the categories of fish only, but there were no associations found between shellfish only and risk of acute myocardial infarction mortality; and

Those in the 2nd, 4th, and 5th quintiles of n-3 fatty acid intake had significantly lower RR of acute myocardial infarction mortality than those in the 1st quintile (RR=0.39, 95% CI 0.20-0.75; RR=0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.97; RR=0.43, 95% CI 0.23-0.81, respectively). Those in the 3rd quintile also had a lower RR compared to the 1st quintile, but it was not significant (RR=0.67, 95% CI 0.42-1.08).

There were no significant associations between fish intake and other ischemic heart disease mortality or stroke mortality or between n-3 fatty acid intake and other ischemic heart disease mortality.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Gillum et al., 2000

Cohort

Men and women (n=8825)

White (n=7421)

Black (n=1404)

Aged 25-74 years

US general population (civilian, non-institutionalized) excluding Alaska, Hawaii, and reservation lands of American Indians

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study

No history of heart disease at baseline

No unknown baseline fish consumption, systolic blood pressure, serum cholesterol concentration, history of diabetes, cigarette smoking status, alcohol intake, body mass index, history of heart disease, nonrecreational physical activity, or educational attainment

Average follow-up of 18.8 years

Primary prevention

Seafood

Oomen et al., 2000

Cohort

Men

Aged 50-69 years

Finland (n=1088), Italy (n=1097), Netherlands (n=553) cohorts of the Seven Countries Study

Free of CHD at baseline

Follow-up of 20 years

Primary prevention

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Categories of fish consumption:

1 = Never

2 = <1 occasion/week

3 = 1 occasion/week

4 = >1 occasion/week

After adjusting for baseline age, smoking, history of diabetes, education <high school graduate, systolic blood pressure, serum cholesterol concentration, BMI, alcohol intake, and physical activity:

Among White men, those who ate fish 1 occasion/week had a significantly lower RR of all-cause mortality (RR=0.76, 95% CI 0.63-0.91) and noncardiovascular disease mortality (RR=0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.88) compared to those who never ate fish. No other comparisons between categories of fish consumption, and all-cause, cardiovascular disease, or noncardiovascular disease, mortality were significant;

There were no significant associations found between fish intake and all-cause, cardiovascular disease, and noncardiovascular disease mortality among Black men, White women, or Black women; and

There were no significant associations found between fish intake and incidence of coronary heart disease among White or Black men or women.

B

Finland fish consumption:

1 = 0-19 g/day

2 = 20-39 g/day

3 = ≥40 g/day

Italy fish consumption:

1 = 0 g/day

2 = 1-19 g/day

3 = 20-39 g/day

4 = ≥40 g/day

Netherlands fish consumption:

1 = 0 g/day

2 = 1-19 g/day

3 = ≥20 g/day

After adjusting for age, BMI, cigarette smoking, and intake of energy, vegetables, fruit, alcohol, meat, butter, and margarine, there were no significant associations found between total fish consumption and the risk of 20-year CHD mortality in any of the three countries. Similar results were found when the model did not adjust for intake of vegetables, fruit, alcohol, meat, butter, and margarine.

After stratifying by country cohort and pooling the data, the overall RR for CHD mortality for intake of 1-19 g/day of fatty fish was 0.57 (95% CI 0.40-0.80) and for intake of ≥20 g/day of fatty fish was 0.87 (95% CI 0.59-1.27) compared to no fatty fish consumption.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Albert et al., 1998

Cohort

Men (n=20,551)

Aged 40-84 years

US physicians

Physicians’ Health Study

Free of MI, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or cancer at baseline

2-by-2 factorial design to receive aspirin, beta carotene, both active drugs, or both placebo

11 years of follow-up (253,777 person-years)

Primary prevention

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Categories of fish intake:

<1 meal per month 1-3 meals per month 1-<2 meals per week 2-5 meals per week

≥5 meals per week

After adjusting for age, those who ate fish 1-<2 meals per week, 2-<5 meals per week, and ≥5 meals per week had a significantly lower RR of sudden death than those who ate fish only <1 per month (RR=0.42, 95% CI 0.21-0.88; RR=0.46, 95% CI 0.23-0.93; RR=0.34, 95% CI 0.14-0.83, respectively) (p for trend = 0.03).

After combining the higher quartiles of fish consumption, those who ate fish ≥1 per week had a significantly lower relative risk of sudden death than those who ate fish only <1 per month (RR=0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.86) (p for trend = 0.006).

After adjusting for age, aspirin, and beta carotene treatment assignment, evidence of cardiovascular disease prior to 12-month questionnaire, BMI, smoking status, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, history of hypercholesterolemia, alcohol consumption, vigorous exercise, and vitamin E, vitamin C, and multivitamin use:

Those who ate fish 1-<2 meals per week and ≥5 meals per week had a significantly lower RR of sudden death than those who ate fish only <1 per month (RR=0.47, 95% CI 0.23-0.98 and RR=0.39, 95% CI 0.15-0.96, respectively) (p for trend = 0.11); and

After combining the higher quartiles of fish consumption, those who ate ≥1 fish meal per week had a significantly lower RR of sudden death than those who ate only <1 fish meal per month (RR=0.48, 95% CI 0.24-0.96) (p for trend = 0.03).

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Daviglus et al., 1997

Cohort

Men (n=1822)

Aged 40-55 years

Chicago, IL

Employed for at least 2 years at the Western Electric Company Hawthorne Works in Chicago; occupations related to manufacturing telephones

Chicago Western Electric Study

Free of CVD at baseline

Follow-up of 30 years

Primary prevention

Seafood

Mann et al., 1997

Cohort

Men (n=4102)

Women (n=6700)

Vegetarians and their nonvegetarian friends and family

Aged 16-79 years

UK

No cancer at entry

Excluded those who failed to provide full information concerning smoking habits, height, weight, and employment category

Follow-up of 13.3 years (over 143,000 person-years)

Primary prevention

Seafood

Rodriquez et al., 1996

Cohort

Men (n=3310)

Aged 45-68 years

Oahu, Hawaii

Japanese ancestry

Current smokers

Honolulu Heart Program

Free of CHD, stroke, cancer at baseline

Follow-up of 23 years

Primary prevention

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Categories of fish intake:

1 = 0 g/day

2 = 1-17 g/day

3 = 18-34 g/day

4 = ≥35 g/day

After controlling for baseline age and education, religion, systolic blood pressure, serum cholesterol, number of cigarettes smoked per day, BMI, presence or absence of diabetes, presence or absence of electrocardiographic abnormalities, and daily intake of energy, cholesterol, saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated fatty acids, total protein, carbohydrate, alcohol, iron, thiamine, riboflavin, niacin, vitamin C, beta carotene, and retinol:

Those who consumed fish had a lower relative risk of death from MI, CVD, CHD, and all causes. However, the only significant differences were between the 4th category of fish consumption compared to the 1st category for death from overall MI (RR=0.56, 95% CI 0.33-0.93), all CHD (RR=0.62, 95% CI 0.40-0.94), and nonsudden death from MI (RR=0.33, 95% CI 0.12-0.91).

B

Categories of fish intake:

1 = None

2 = <1 time/week

3 = ≥1 time/week

After adjusting for age, sex, smoking, and social class, there were no significant associations found between fish intake and the risk of death from ischemic heart disease or all causes (for those with no evidence of preexisting disease at the time of recruitment).

N

Categories of fish intake:

1 = Almost never

2 = <2 times/week

3 = 2-4 times/week

4 = Almost daily

5 = >1 time/day

Low = <2 times/week

High = ≥2 times/week

After adjusting for age, years lived in Japan, total calories/day, alcohol intake, physical activity, years smoked, hypertension, and serum cholesterol, glucose, and uric acid levels:

In the high-smoking group, those with high fish intake had a significantly lower risk of CHD mortality compared to those with low fish intake (RR=0.5, 95% CI 0.28-0.91). There was no significant association found between fish intake and CHD mortality among past smokers (p=0.6).

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Ascherio et al., 1995

Cohort

Men (n=44,895)

Aged 40-75 years

US health professionals

Health Professional Follow-up Study

Free of known CVD at baseline; no previous diagnosis of MI, angina, stroke, transient ischemic attack, peripheral arterial disease, or had undergone coronary artery surgery

6 years of follow-up (242,029 person-years)

Primary prevention

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Quintiles of n-3 fatty acids (g/day):

0.01-0.11, 0.12-0.19, 0.20-0.28, 0.29-0.41, 0.42-6.52

Category of fish intake:

1 = <1 time/month

2 = 1-3 times/month

3 = 1 time/week

4 = 2-3 times/week

5 = 4-5 times/week

6 = ≥6 times/week

There were no significant associations found between dietary intake of n-3 fatty acids and the risk of coronary artery bypass grafting, nonfatal MI, fatal CHD, any MI, or any CHD.

After controlling for age, those in the 4th category of fish intake had a significantly lower RR of nonfatal MI compared to those in the 1st category (RR=0.65, 95% CI 0.45-0.94). Those in the 2nd, 4th, and 5th categories of fish intake had significantly lower RR of any MI compared to those in the 1st category (RR=0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.99; RR=0.69, 95% CI 0.51-0.94; RR=0.65, 95% CI 0.47-0.92, respectively).

After controlling for age, BMI, smoking habits, alcohol consumption, history of hypertension, history of diabetes, history of hypercholesterolemia, family history of MI before 60 years of age, and profession:

Those in the 5th and 6th categories of fish intake had a significantly higher RR of coronary artery bypass grafting than those in the 1st category (RR=1.71, 95% CI 1.09-2.68 and RR=1.65, 95% CI 1.03-2.64, respectively);

Those in the 2nd and 4th categories of fish intake had a significantly lower RR of nonfatal MI than those in the 1st category (RR=0.62, 95% CI 0.39-1.00 and RR=0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.97, respectively);

Those in the 5th category of fish intake had a significantly lower relative risk of fatal CHD than those in the 1st category (RR=0.54, 95% CI 0.29-1.00);

Those in the 2nd, 4th, and 5th categories of fish intake had a significantly lower RR of any MI than those in the 1st category (RR=0.66, 95% CI 0.44-0.97; RR=0.69, 95% CI 0.51-0.94; RR=0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.92, respectively); and

No other significant associations were found between fish intake and CHD.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Kromhout et al., 1995

Cohort

Men (n=137)

Women (n=135)

Aged 64-87 years for men

Aged 64-85 years for women

Rotterdam, Netherlands

All patients of the same general practice

Follow-up of 17 years

Primary prevention

Seafood

Salonen et al., 1995

Cohort

Men (n=1833)

Aged 42, 48, 54, or 60 years

Eastern Finland

Kuopio Ischaemic Heart Disease Risk Factor Study (KIHD)

No CHD, history of cerebrovascular stroke, claudication, or cancer at baseline

Mean follow-up time for AMI for individuals of 5 years

Mean follow-up time for death of 6 years

Primary prevention

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Fish intake = yes or no

After adjusting for age, gender, prevalence of MI and angina pectoris, systolic blood pressure, total cholesterol, smoking, alcohol and energy intake/body weight, those who ate fish had a significant lower RR of CHD mortality than those who did not eat fish (RR=0.51, 95% CI 0.29-0.89).

The difference in CHD mortality between the fish eaters and the non-fish eaters became apparent after 5 years of follow-up.

B

Continuous variable = g/day

Binary variable = <30 or ≥30 g/day

After adjusting for age, examination year, ischemic exercise ECG, and maximal oxygen uptake, family history of CHD, cigarette-years, mean systolic blood pressure, diabetes, socioeconomic status, place of residence, dietary iron intake, and serum apolipoprotein B, HDL-cholesterol, and ferritin concentrations:

Each one unit (g/day) increase in fish intake significantly increased the risk of fatal or non-fatal AMI (RR=1.004, 95% CI 1.001-1.007). There were no significant associations between fish intake (as a continuous variable) and death from CHD, CVD, or all causes; and

Those who consumed ≥30 g/day of fish had a significantly higher risk of fatal or nonfatal AMI compared to those who consumed >30 g/ day (RR=1.87, 95% CI 1.13-3.09). There was no significant association found between fish intake ≥30 g/day and CHD, CVD, or all-cause mortality.

Similar results were found when the model only adjusted for age, examination year, ischemic exercise ECG, and maximal oxygen uptake.

A

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Dolecek, 1992

Cohort (nested in an RCT)

Men (n=6250)

Aged 35-57 years

22 US clinical centers

Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT)

Only included those in the usual care group for this analysis

At high risk of developing CHD because of smoking status, diastolic blood pressure, and serum cholesterol levels

Follow-up of 10.5 years

Primary prevention

Seafood

Fraser et al., 1992

Cohort

Men and women (n=26,473)

Mean age 51 years (men)

Mean age 53 years (women)

California

Non-Hispanic White Adventists

The Adventist Health Study

No history of heart disease or diabetes at baseline; almost no current smokers (although some past smokers)

Follow-up of 6 years

Primary prevention

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Quintiles of fish n-3s:

Quintile 1 = mean of 0.000 g

Quintile 2 = mean of 0.009 g

Quintile 3 = mean of 0.046 g

Quintile 4 = mean of 0.153 g

Quintile 5 = mean of 0.664 g

After adjusting for age, race, smoking, baseline diastolic blood pressure, high density lipoprotein, low density lipoprotein, and alcohol: A one-unit increase in fish n-3 consumption, expressed in grams, significantly decreased one’s risk of CVD mortality (β=−0.9598, p<0.01) and CHD mortality (β=−0.93388, p<0.05); however there were no significant associations found between fish n-3 consumption and risk of mortality from cancer or all causes; and

A one-unit increase in fish n-3 consumption, expressed as % kcal, significantly decreased one’s risk of CVD mortality (β=−0.4499, p<0.01), CHD mortality (β=−0.4715, p<0.05), and all-cause mortality (β=−0.2590, p<0.05); however there was no significant association found between fish n-3 consumption and risk of mortality from cancer.

B

Categories of fish intake:

1 = None

2 = 0<x<1 time/week

3 = ≥1 time/week

After stratifying for age, sex, smoking, exercise, relative weight, and high blood pressure, no significant RRs were found for definite nonfatal MI, definite fatal CHD, or fatal CHD as determined by death certificate, based on fish intake. However, there seemed to be a trend of lower RRs for higher intakes of fish.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Kromhout et al., 1985

Cohort

Men (n=852)

Aged 40-59 years

Zutphen, Netherlands

The Zutphen Study (Dutch contribution to the Seven Countries Study)

Free of CHD at baseline

Follow-up of 20 years

Primary prevention

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Categories of fish intake:

1 = 0 g/day

2 = 1-14 g/day

3 = 15-29 g/day

4 = 30-44 g/day

5 = ≥45 g/day

After adjusting for age, systolic blood pressure, serum total cholesterol, cigarette smoking, subscapular skinfold thickness, physical activity, energy intake, dietary cholesterol, prescribed diet, and occupation:

Those in category 4 of fish intake had a significantly lower RR of death from coronary heart disease than those in the 1st category (RR=0.36, 95% CI 0.14-0.93); and

Those in the 2nd, 3rd, and 5th fish consumption categories also had lower RRs of death from coronary heart disease than those in the 1st category, but they were not significant (p for trend = <0.05).

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Albert et al., 2002

Case-control (nested)

Cases (n=94) = sudden death occurred (first manifestation of CVD)

Controls (n=184) = free of confirmed CVD

Men

Aged 40-84 years

US physicians

Physicians’ Health Study

Free of MI, stroke, transient ischemic attacks, or cancer at baseline

2-by-2 factorial design to receive aspirin, beta carotene, both active drugs, or both placebo

17 years of follow-up (time from study enrollment to sudden death = 0.7-16.9 years)

Primary prevention

Baseline blood fatty acid levels

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Quartiles of n-3 fatty acids (% total fatty acids):

2.12-4.32, 4.33-5.19, 5.20-6.07, 6.08-10.2

After adjusting for age and smoking status:

The RR of sudden death was significantly lower for those in the 3rd and 4th quartiles of n-3 fatty acid intake (RR=0.37, 95% CI 0.17-0.83 and RR=0.31, 95% CI 0.13-0.75, respectively) compared to those in the 1st quartile (p for trend = 0.004).

After adjusting for assignment to aspirin and beta carotene treatment or placebo, BMI, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, history of hypercholesterolemia, alcohol consumption, frequency of vigorous exercise and parental history of MI before the age of 60:

The RR of sudden death was significantly lower for those in the 3rd and 4th quartiles of n-3 fatty acid intake (RR=0.28, 95% CI 0.09-0.87 and RR=0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.71, respectively) compared to those in the 1st quartile (p for trend = 0.007).

After adjusting for assignment to aspirin and beta carotene treatment or placebo, BMI, history of diabetes, history of hypertension, history of hypercholesterolemia, alcohol consumption, frequency of vigorous exercise, parental history of myocardial infarction before the age of 60, trans unsaturated fatty acid and monounsaturated fatty acid levels:

The RR of sudden death was significantly lower for those in the 3rd and 4th quartiles of n-3 fatty acids (RR=0.19, 95% CI 0.05-0.69 and RR=0.10, 95% CI 0.02-0.48, respectively) compared to those in the 1st quartile (p for trend = 0.001).

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Martinez-Gonzalez et al., 2002

Case-control

Cases = suffered first definite AMI; admitted to hospital (n=171)

Controls = admitted to same hospital during same month for unrelated conditions (n=171)

Men and women

Aged <80 years

Three tertiary hospitals of Pamplona, Spain

No history of angina pectoris, a previous diagnosis of CHD, or other prior diagnosis of major cardiovascular disease

Secondary prevention

Seafood

Sasazuki et al., 2001

Case-control

Cases = first episode of AMI (n=632)

Controls = residents from same municipalities as the cases (n=1214)

Men and women

Aged 40-79 years

22 collaborating hospitals in Fukuoka City, Japan, and in 21 adjacent municipalities

Fukuoka Heart Study

Secondary prevention

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Categories of fish intake:

1 = <60 g/day

2 = 60-77 g/day

3 = 77-106 g/day

4 = 106-142 g/day

5 = >142 g/day

After adjusting for age, hospital, gender, smoking, BMI, high blood pressure, high blood cholesterol, diabetes, leisure-time physical activity, socioeconomic status, and total energy:

Those in the 3rd and 5th categories of fish intake had significantly lower ORs of first MI compared to those in the 1st category (OR=0.28, 95% CI 0.10-0.77 and OR=0.31, 95% CI 0.11-0.85, respectively).

Those in the 2nd and 4th categories of fish intake also had lower ORs compared to those in the 1st category, but they were not significant.

Those in the three upper quintiles of fish intake had a significantly lower OR of a first MI compared to those in the lower quintile (OR=0.36, 95% CI 0.15-0.87). After further adjusting for olive oil, fiber, fruits, vegetables, alcohol, meat/meat products, and white bread/ rice/pasta intake, this association was not significant (OR=0.37, 95% CI 0.13-1.03).

B

Categories of fish consumption (men and women):

Low = <2/week

Intermediate = 2-3/week

High = 4+/week

After adjusting for smoking, alcohol use, sedentary job, leisure-time physical activity, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, angina pectoris, and obesity:

Men who consumed intermediate and high levels of fish had a significantly lower RR of acute MI compared to those who consumed low levels of fish (RR=0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.8 and RR=0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.9, respectively); and

The relative risks for acute MI based on fish consumption were not significant among women.

Similar results were found when also adjusting for fruit and tofu intake.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Tavani et al., 2001

Case-control

Cases = first episode of nonfatal AMI; admitted to hospital (n=507)

Controls = admitted to same hospital for unrelated conditions (n=478)

Men and women

Aged 25-79 years

Greater Milan, Italy area

Secondary prevention

Seafood

Siscovick et al., 1995

Case-control

Case = primary cardiac arrest patients (n=334)

Controls = from community (n=493)

Men and women

Aged 25-74 years

Married

Seattle and suburban King County, WA

Free of prior clinical heart disease, major comorbidities, and use of fish-oil supplements

On average, 4 months between the date of cardiac arrest and in-person interview

Primary prevention

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Mixed Mediterranean fish = 0.94 g of n-3 per portion

Other fish = 0.49 g of n-3/portion

Canned tuna, mackerel, and sardines = 0.34 g of n-3/portion

Categories of n-3 PUFA:

Lowest = <0.81 g/week

Intermediate = 0.81-1.28 g/week

Highest = >1.28 g/week

Categories of total fish and fresh fish:

1 = <1 portion/week

2 = 1-<2 portions/week

3 = ≥2 portions/week

Categories of canned fish:

1 = 0 portions/week

2 = >0-<1 portion/week

3 = ≥1 portion/week

After adjusting for age; sex; education; BMI; cholesterol; smoking; coffee, alcohol, meat, vegetables, fruit, and calorie intake; physical activity; hyperlipidemia; diabetes; hypertension; and family history of AMI in first-degree relative:

Those who consume an intermediate or high level of n-3 PUFAs had a significantly lower OR of AMI compared to those who consumed a low level of n-3 PUFAs (OR=0.67, 95% CI 0.47-0.96 and OR=0.67, 95% CI 0.47-0.95, respectively).

Those who consume two or more portions of total fish/week had a significantly lower OR of AMI compared to those who consume less than one portion/week (OR=0.68, 95% CI 0.47-0.98). Those who consume 1-<2 portions/week of total fish also had a lower OR of AMI than those who consume <1 portion/week, but it was not significant.

There were no significant associations found between fresh fish intake and canned fish intake and the risk of AMI.

Similar results were found when the model only adjusted for age and sex.

B

Average serving size = 3 oz of fish

Quartiles of n-3 fatty acids (g/month):

Quartile 1 = 0.12-1.95

Quartile 2 = 1.96-4.05

Quartile 3 = 4.06-7.40

Quartile 4 = 7.41-42.72

After adjusting for age, current smoking, former smoking, family history of MI or sudden death, fat intake scale, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, physical activity, weight, height, and education:

Those in quartiles 2, 3, and 4 of dietary n-3 fatty acid intakes all had significantly lower ORs of primary cardiac arrest compared to those who never consumed fish (OR=0.7, 95% CI 0.6-0.9; OR=0.5, 95% CI 0.4-0.8; OR=0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.7, respectively). Those in the 1st quartile also had a lower OR of primary cardiac arrest compared to those who never consumed fish, but it was not significant.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Gramenzi et al., 1990

Case-control

Cases = an acute MI (n=287)

Controls = acute disorders unrelated to ischemic heart disease (n=649)

Women

Aged 22-69 years for cases

Aged 21-69 years for controls

30 hospitals in northern Italy

No chronic or digestive conditions; cardiovascular, malignant, hormonal, or gynecological disease; or any disorder that was potentially related to consumption of alcohol or smoking

Primary prevention

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Tertiles of fish intake (# portions/week):

Tertile 1 = <1

Tertile 2 = 1

Tertile 3 = >1

After adjusting for age, area of residence, education, smoking, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, and BMI, the OR for MI was 0.8 for the 2nd tertile of fish intake and 0.7 for the 3rd tertile of fish intake, compared to the 1st tertile (p<0.05).

After adjusting for age, area of residence, education, smoking, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, BMI, carrots, green vegetables, fresh fruit, meat, ham and salami, butter, total fat score, coffee, and alcohol, the OR for MI was 1.0 for the 2nd tertile of fish intake and 0.8 for the 3rd tertile of fish intake, compared to the 1st tertile, and they were not significant.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Bang et al., 1971

Ecological

Men (n=61)

Women (n=69)

Aged >30 years

Eskimos in the northwest coast of Greenland, compared to Danish controls Most are hunters and/or fishermen

Primary prevention

Plasma total lipids, lipoproteins, cholesterol, and triglycerides

*Included in Balk E, Chung M, Lichtenstein A, Chew P, Kupelnick B, Lawrence A, DeVine D, Lau J. 2004. Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Intermediate Markers of Cardiovascular Disease. Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 93 (Prepared by the Tufts-New England Medical Center Evidence-based Practice Center, Boston, MA). AHRQ Publication No. 04-E010-1. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Total lipids (g/L±SD):

Eskimo men = 6.17±0.89

Eskimo women = 6.13±0.88

Danish men = 7.12±1.24

Danish women = 7.29±1.16

Cholesterol (g/L±SD):

Eskimo men = 2.33±0.35

Eskimo women = 2.22±0.43

Danish men = 2.73±0.49

Danish women = 2.86±0.49

Triglycerides (g/L±SD):

Eskimo men = 0.57±0.28

Eskimo women = 0.44±0.13

Danish men = 1.29±0.62

Danish women = 1.08±0.51

Pre-β-lipoproteins (g/L±SD):

Eskimo men = 0.48±0.31

Eskimo women = 0.43±0.33

Danish men = 1.70±0.86

Danish women = 1.08±0.51

β-lipoproteins (g/L±SD):

Eskimo men = 4.38±0.93

Eskimo women = 4.45±0.89

Danish men = 5.11±1.16

Danish women = 5.31±1.32

α-lipoproteins (g/L±SD):

Eskimo men = 4.02±1.39

Eskimo women = 3.91±1.41

Danish men = 2.78±0.82

Danish women = 3.64±0.94

Among males, the Eskimos had significantly lower plasma total lipids (p<0.001), cholesterol (p<0.001), triglycerides (p<0.001), pre-β-lipoproteins (p<0.001), β-lipoproteins (p<0.001), and α-lipoproteins (p<0.001) compared to the Danes. However, the differences in total lipids and cholesterol among men 31-40 years and β-lipoproteins among men 31-50 years between the Eskimos and the Danes were not significant.

Among women, the Eskimos had significantly lower plasma total lipids (p<0.001), cholesterol (p<0.001), triglycerides (p<0.001), pre-β-lipoproteins (p<0.001), and β-lipoproteins (p<0.001). However, the difference in β-lipoproteins among women 31-50 years between the Eskimos and the Danes was not significant.

There were no significant differences in α-lipoproteins among the female Eskimos and Danes.

B

**N = Evidence of no association or no clear association; B = Evidence of a benefit; A = Evidence of an adverse effect.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

TABLE B-2b Studies on Stroke

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Hooper et al., 2005

Cochrane Review

48 RCTs

At least 6 months of omega-3 fatty acids vs. placebo or control

26 cohorts (47 analyses)

Follow-up of 4-25 years

n-3 supplement

Bouzan et al., 2005

Meta-analysis

5 cohort studies

1 case-control study

Seafood

He et al., 2004a

Meta-analysis

9 cohorts (from 8 studies)

English language

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

 

Based on RCTs, no significant association was found between omega-3 intake and risk of total stroke based on a meta-analysis (RR=1.17, 95% CI 0.91-1.51) or sensitivity analysis (RR=0.87, 95% CI 0.72-1.04).

N

Servings/week, a continuous variable

In the linear regression model, for each one-unit increase in servings/week of fish, the change in the risk ratio of total stroke is −0.20 (95% CI −0.06 to 0.027), but this is not significant.

In the quadratic regression model, for each one-unit increase in servings/week of fish, the change in the risk ratio of total stroke is 0.0037 (95% CI −0.0096 to 0.017), but this is not significant.

N

Categories of fish consumption:

1 = <1 time/month

2 = 1-3 times/month

3 = 1 time/week

4 = 2-4 times/week

5 = ≥5 times/week

Based on pooled RRs, those who consumed fish 1 time/week, 2-4 times/week, and ≥5 times/week had significantly lower RR of stroke compared to those who consumed fish <1 time/month (RR=0.87, 95% CI 0.77-0.98; RR=0.82, 95% CI 0.72-0.94; and RR=0.69, 95% CI 0.54-0.88, respectively); the RR was not significant for those who consumed fish 1-3 times/month compared to those who consumed fish <1 time/month.

Based on pooled RRs, those who consumed fish 1-3 times/month, 1 time/week, 2-4 times/week, and ≥5 times/week had significantly lower RR of ischemic stroke compared to those who consumed fish <1 time/month (RR=0.69, 95% CI 0.48-0.99; RR=0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.88; RR=0.66, 95% CI 0.51-0.87; and RR=0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.93, respectively).

There were no significant associations found between fish consumption and hemorrhagic stroke.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Mozaffarian et al., 2005

Cohort

Men and women (n=4778)

Aged ≥65 years

4 US communities

From Medicare eligibility lists

Free of known cerebrovascular disease at baseline

Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS)

12 years of follow-up

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Categories of tuna/other fish intake:

1 = <1 time/month

2 = 1-3 times/month

3 = 1-4 times/week

4 = ≥5 times/week

Categories for fried fish/fish sandwich intakes:

1 = <1 time/month

2 = 1-3 times/month

3 = ≥1 time/week

After adjusting for age, sex, education, diabetes, coronary heart disease, smoking status, pack-years of smoking, aspirin use, BMI, leisure-time physical activity, alcohol use, total caloric intake, systolic blood pressure, LDL-c, HDL-c, triglyceride, and C-reactive protein levels:

Those who consumed tuna/other fish 1-4 times/week had a significantly lower risk of total stroke and ischemic stroke compared to those who consumed tuna/other fish <1 time/month (HR=0.74, 95% CI 0.56-0.98 and HR=0.73, 95% CI 0.54-0.98, respectively). Those who consumed tuna/ other fish 1-3 times/month and ≥5 times/week also had lower risks of total stroke and ischemic stroke compared to those who consumed tuna/other fish <1 time/month, but they were not significant;

Those who consumed fried fish/fish sandwiches ≥1 time/week had significantly higher risk of total stroke and ischemic stroke compared to those who consumed fried fish/fish sandwiches <1 time/month (HR=1.33, 95% CI 1.05-1.68 and HR=1.39, 95% CI 1.08-1.79, respectively); and

There were no significant associations found between tuna/other fish intake or fried fish/fish sandwich intake and the risk of hemorrhagic stroke.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Sauvaget et al., 2003

Cohort

Men (n=14,209)

Women (n=22,921)

Aged 34-103 years

Nagasaki and Hiroshima, Japan

The Life Span Study

Atomic bomb survivors and their non-exposed controls

No prevalent cases of cancer, self-reported cases of stroke, ischemic heart disease, and both stroke and ischemic heart disease

Follow-up of 16 years

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Categories of fish intake:

1 = Never

2 = ≤1 time/week

3 = 2-4 times/week

4 = Almost daily

Tertiles of fish intake:

Low = 11-18 g/day

Moderate = 30 g/day

High = 46-65 g/day

After adjusting for sex, birth cohort, city, radiation dose, self-reported BMI, smoking status, alcohol habits, education level, history of diabetes, and hypertension:

There was no significant association found between fish (except broiled) intake and the risk of total stroke mortality, when fish intake was defined as never, ≤1 time/week, 2-4 times/week, and almost daily; however, there was a significant trend (p=0.046);

Those who ate broiled fish almost daily had a significantly lower RR of total stroke mortality compared to those who never ate broiled fish (HR=0.60, 95% CI 0.37-0.98);

Those who ate moderate and high levels of fish products had significantly lower RRs of total stroke (RR=0.85, 95% CI 0.75-0.97 and RR=0.85, 95% CI 0.75-0.98, respectively) and intracerebral hemorrhage (RR=0.70, 95% CI 0.54-0.91 and RR=0.70, 95% CI 0.54-0.92, respectively) compared to those who ate low levels of fish products; and

There were no significant associations between intake (defined as low, moderate, and high) of fish products and cerebral infarction.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

He et al., 2002*

Cohort

Men (n=43,671)

Aged 40-75 years

US health professionals

Health Professional Follow-up Study

No previously diagnosed stroke, MI, coronary artery surgery, angina pectoris, peripheral arterial disease, diabetes mellitus, transient ischemic attack, or other cardiovascular disease

Follow-up of 12 years

Seafood and dietary n-3 fatty acid intake

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Serving sizes:

Dark-meat fish = 3-5 oz (1.60 g n-3)

Canned tuna = 3-4 oz (0.41 g n-3)

Other fish = 3-5 oz (0.56 g n-3)

Shrimp/lobster/scallops = 3.5 oz (0.26 g n-3)

Categories of fish intake:

1 = <1 time/month

2 = 1-3 times/month

3 = 1 time/week

4 = 2-4 times/week

5 = ≥5 times/week

Quintiles of n-3 fatty acids:

1 = <0.05 g/day

2 = 0.05-<0.2 g/day

3 = 0.2-<0.4 g/day

4 = 0.4-<0.6 g/day

5 = ≥0.6 g/day

After adjusting for BMI, physical activity, history of hypertension, smoking status, use of aspirin, fish oil, multivitamins, intake of total calories, total fat, saturated fat, trans-unsaturated fat, alcohol, potassium, magnesium, total servings of fruits and vegetables, and hypercholesterolemia at baseline:

Those in the higher quintiles of cumulative fish consumption all had significantly lower RR of ischemic stroke compared to those who consumed fish <1 time/month (RR=0.57, 95% CI 0.35-0.95; RR=0.56, 95% CI 0.37-0.84; RR=0.55, 95% CI 0.36-0.85; and RR=0.54, 95% CI 0.31-0.94, respectively);

Those in the 4th quintile of cumulative fish intake had a significantly lower RR of total stroke than those in the 1st quintile (RR=0.67, 95% CI 0.46-0.96). The other quintiles also had lower relative risks compared to the 1st quintile, but they were not significant;

There were no significant associations found between cumulative fish intake and the risk of hemorrhagic stroke; similar results were found for most recent fish intake;

Those in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quintiles of n-3 PUFA intake had significantly lower RRs of ischemic stroke compared to those in the first quintile (RR=0.56, 95% CI 0.35-0.88; RR=0.63, 95% CI 0.40-0.98; RR=0.54, 95% CI 0.32-0.91, respectively). Those in the 5th quintile also had a lower RR of ischemic stroke compared to those in the 1st quintile, but it was not significant; and

There were no significant associations found between n-3 PUFA intake and total stroke or hemorrhagic stroke.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Iso et al., 2001*

Cohort

Women (n=79,839)

Aged 34-59 years

US nurses

Nurses’ Health Study

No history of cancer, angina, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, stroke, other cardiovascular diseases before baseline; or a history of physician-diagnosed diabetes or high serum cholesterol levels

Follow-up of 14 years (1,086,261 person-years)

Seafood and dietary n-3 fatty acid intake

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Serving sizes:

Dark-meat fish = 3-5 oz (1.51 g EPA/DHA)

Canned tuna = 3-4 oz (0.42 g EPA/DHA)

Other fish = 3-5 oz (0.48 g EPA/DHA)

Shrimp/lobster/scallops = 3.5 oz (0.32 g EPA/DHA)

Categories of fish intake:

1 = <1 time/month

2 = 1-3 times/month

3 = 1 time/week

4 = 2-4 times/week

5 = ≥5 times/week

Quintiles of n-3 PUFAs (median in grams):

1 = 0.077 g/day

2 = 0.118 g/day

3 = 0.171 g/day

4 = 0.221 g/day

5 = 0.481 g/day

After adjusting for Joules, BMI, alcohol intake, menopausal status and postmenopausal hormone use, vigorous exercise, usual aspirin use, multivitamin use, history of hypertension, and frequency of total fruit and vegetable intake and for intake of saturated fat, trans-unsaturated fat, linoleic acid, animal protein, and calcium:

Those who consume 2-4 servings of fish/week had a signficantly lower RR of thrombotic infarction than those who ate fish <1 time/month (RR=0.52, 95% CI 0.27-0.99). Although all other categories of higher fish consumption had lower RRs of thrombotic infarction than the 1st category, they were not significant;

Those who ate fish 2 or more times per week had sigificantly lower RR of lacunar infarction than those who ate fish <1 time/month (RR=0.28, 95% CI 0.12-0.67). Although all other categories of higher fish consumption had lower RRs of lacunar infarction than the 1st category, they were not significant;

There were no significant associations found between fish consumption and total stroke, ischemic stroke, large-artery occlusive infarction, hemorrhagic stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or intraparenchymal hemorrhage;

Those in quintile 3 of omega-3 PUFA intake had a significantly lower RR of total stroke (RR=0.69, 95% CI 0.53-0.89), ischemic stroke (RR=0.67, 95% CI 0.47-0.98), and thrombotic infarction (RR=0.64, 95% CI 0.43-0.95) compared to those in quintile 1;

Those in quintile 5 of omega-3 PUFA intake had a significantly lower RR of total stroke (RR=0.72, 95% CI 0.53-0.99) and lacunar infarction (RR=0.37, 95% CI 0.19-0.73) compared to those in quintile 1; and

There were no significant associations found between omega-3 PUFA intake and large-artery occlusive infarction, hemorrhagic stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or intraparenchymal hemorrhage.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Yuan et al., 2001

Cohort

Men (n=18,244)

Aged 45-64 years

Shanghai, China

No history of cancer

Follow-up of 12 years (179,466 person-years)

Primary prevention

Seafood and dietary n-3 fatty acid intake

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Fresh fish = 0.57 g n-3 fatty acids/100 g

Salted fish = 0.44 g n-3 fatty acids/100 g

Shellfish = 0.36 g n-3 fatty acids/100 g

Fish and shellfish categories (g/week):

1 = <50 (<1 serving/week)

2 = 50-<100 (1 serving/week)

3 = 100-<150 (2 servings/week)

4 = 150-<200 (3 servings/week)

5 = ≥200 (≥4 servings/week)

Quintiles of n-3 fatty acids: (g/week)

1 = <0.27

2 = 0.27-0.43

3 = 0.44-0.72

4 = 0.73-1.09

5 = ≥1.10

After controlling for age, total energy intake, level of education, BMI, current smoker at recruitment, average number of cigarettes smoked per day, number of alcoholic drinks consumed per week, history of diabetes, and history of hypertension:

There were no significant associations found between fish consumption and risk of stroke mortality; and

Those in the 3rd quintile of n-3 fatty acid intake had significantly lower RR of stroke mortality compared to those in the 1st quintile (RR=0.76, 95% CI 0.58-0.98). Those in the 2nd, 4th, and 5th quintiles also had lower RRs of stroke mortality compared to those in the 1st quintile, but they were not significant.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Gillum et al., 1996*

Cohort

Men and women (n=5192)

Aged 45-74 years

White (n=4410)

Black (n=782)

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) I

No history of stroke at baseline

Excluded those with unknown baseline fish consumption, systolic blood pressure, serum cholesterol level, diabetes history, number of cigarettes smoked, BMI, history of heart disease, or educational attainment

Average follow-up of 12 years

Seafood

Orencia et al., 1996*

Cohort

Men (n=1847)

Aged 40-55 years

Employed at least 2 years at the Hawthorne Works of the Western Electric Co. in Chicago, IL

65% first- or second-generation Americans, predominantly of German, Polish, or Bohemian ancestry

Chicago Western Electric Study

Free of CHD and stroke at baseline

Follow-up of 30 years (46,426 person-years)

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Categories of fish consumption:

1 = Never

2 = <1 time/week

3 = 1 time/week

4 = >1 time/week

After adjusting for baseline age, smoking, history of diabetes, history of heart disease, education less than high school graduate, systolic blood pressure, serum albumin concentration, serum cholesterol concentration, BMI, alcohol intake, and physical activity:

White women aged 45-74 years who ate fish >1 time/week had a significantly lower RR of acute stroke incidence compared to those who never ate fish (RR=0.55, 95% CI 0.32-0.93);

Significant RRs were not found when the women were separated and analyzed based on different age groups (45-64 years and 65-74 years) or for White men; and

Black men and women who ate any fish had a significantly lower RR of acute stroke incidence (RR=0.51, 95% CI 0.30-0.88) and stroke death (RR=0.26, 95% CI 0.11-0.64) compared to those who never ate fish.

B

Categories of fish consumption:

1 = None

2 = 1-17 g/day

3 = 18-34 g/day

4 = ≥35 g/day

After adjusting for age, systolic blood pressure, cigarette smoking, serum cholesterol, diabetes, ECG abnormalities, table salt use, alcohol intake, iron, thiamine, riboflavin, niacin, vitamin C, beta-carotene, retinol, total energy, polyunsaturated fatty acids, carbohydrates, and total protein, there were no significant associations found between fish consumption and risk of fatal and nonfatal stroke.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Morris et al., 1995*

Cohort

Men (n=21,185)

Aged 40-84 years

US physicians

Physicians’ Health Study

No history of MI, stroke, transient ischemic attacks, cancer, liver or renal disease, peptic ulcer, gout, current use of aspirin, other platelet-active drugs, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents

Follow-up of 4 years

Seafood and dietary n-3 fatty acid intake

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Categories of fish:

1 = Canned tuna

2 = Dark-meat fish (4-6 oz)

3 = Other fish (4-6 oz)

4 = Shrimp, lobster, or scallops

Categories of fish intake:

1 = <1 meal/week

2 = 1 meal/week

3 = 2-4 meals/week

4 = ≥5 meals/week

Quintiles of n-3 fatty acids intake (g/week):

1 = <0.5

2 = 0.5-<1.0

3 = 1.0-<1.7

4 = 1.7-<2.3

5 = ≥2.3

After adjusting for each level of fish consumption, age, aspirin and beta-carotene assignment, smoking, alcohol consumption, obesity, diabetes mellitus, vigorous exercise, parental history of MI before age 60 years, history of hypertension, history of hypercholesterolemia, vitamin supplement use, and saturated fat intake:

Those who consumed 1 fish meal/week had a significantly higher RR of total MI (RR=1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.1) and cardiovascular deaths (RR=2.6, 95% CI 1.4-4.8) compared to those who consume fish <1 meal/week;

No other significant RRs of total myocardial infarction, nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular deaths, or total cardiovascular events were found based on weekly fish consumption;

Those in the 2nd quintile of omega-3 fatty acid intake had a higher RR of total MI than those in the 1st quintile (RR=1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.4); and

No other significant RR of total MI, nonfatal MI, stroke, cardiovascular deaths, or total cardiovascular events were found based on weekly omega-3 fatty acid intake.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Keli et al., 1994*

Cohort

Men (n=552)

Aged 50-69 years

Zutphen, Netherlands

The Zutphen Study (Dutch contribution to the Seven Countries Study)

Free of stroke at baseline

Follow-up of 15 years

Seafood

Kromann and Green, 1980

Cohort

Men and women (n=1800)

All ages

Born in Greenland and/or with Greenlandic mothers in the Upernavik district, northwest Greenland

5-10% persons of other origin

Follow-up of 25 years (40,472 person-years)

Diet

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Categories of fish consumption:

Low = ≤20 g/day

High = >20 g/day

Fish consumption (g/day) was significantly different in those who did not suffer from a stroke (18.3±19.8) than those who did (12.8±12.3) after 15 years of follow-up (p<0.05).

After adjusting for age, average systolic blood pressure 1960-1970, average serum cholesterol 1960-1970, cigarette smoking until 1970, and intake of energy and vegetable protein, alcohol consumption, and prescribed diet in 1970:

Those who consumed >20 g/day of fish had a lower, but not statistically significant, HR of stroke incidence than those who ate ≤20 g/day of fish (HR=0.49, 95% CI 0.24-1.01);

Those who always consumed fish did not have a significantly lower HR of stroke incidence than those who ate fish “not always” (HR=0.71, 95% CI 0.38-1.33).

B

This population is mainly occupied with whaling and sealing, fowling, and to a lesser degree fishing

The traditional diet is supplemented with Danish food

Summarizes the disease patterns of cancer, “apoplexy,” epilepsy, peptic ulcer, acute myocardial infarction, rheumatic fever, chronic polyarthritis, chronic pyelonephritis, chronic glomerulonephritis, diabetes mellitus, psoriasis, psychosis, multiple sclerosis, and thyrotoxicosis.

The pattern of disease in this study “differs from that of Western Europe, as we have found frequent occurrence of apoplexy and grand mal epilepsy, but rare or nonoccurrence of acute myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, thyrotoxicosis, bronchial asthma, multiple sclerosis and psoriasis.”

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Caicoya, 2002*

Case-control

Cases (n=440) = incident cases of stroke

Controls (n=473) = no acute stroke, living in study area at time of study

Aged 40-85 years

Asturias, Spain (a northern region)

Seafood and dietary n-3 fatty acid intake

Jamrozik et al., 1994

Case-control

Cases (n=501) = stroke, drawn from the register of acute cerebrovascular events compiled as part of the Perth Community Stroke Study (PCSS)

Controls (n=931) = drawn from electoral rolls for the study area of the PCSS

Men and women

Perth, Western Australia

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Categories of fish consumption (based on the 20th, 50th, and 80th percentiles):

1 = Noneaters, eaters of ≤11.2 g/day

2 = 11.3 g/day < x < 28.7 g/day

3 = 28.8 g/day ≤ x < 46.5 g/day

4 = ≥46.5 g/day

Categories of n-3 fatty acid intake:

20th percentile = 115 mg/day

50th percentile = 328 mg/day

80th percentile = 660 mg/day

After adjusting for hypertension, alcohol intake, atrial fibrillation, and peripheral artery disease:

Those who ate 1-22.5 g of fish/day had a significantly lower OR of stroke compared to those who never ate fish (OR=0.30, 95% CI 0.12-0.78). No significant ORs for stroke were found for those who consumed 23-45, 46-90, or 91-250 g of fish/day; and

Those who ate >46.5 g of fish/day had a significantly higher OR of cerebral infarction compared to those who never ate fish (OR=1.98, 95% CI 1.08-3.45). No significant ORs for cerebral infarction were found for those who consumed 11.3-28.7 or 28.8-46.5 g of fish/day; and

There was no significant association found between intake of n-3 fatty acids (mg/day) and risk of stroke.

B

Consumption of fish >2 times/month

After adjusting for alcohol and tobacco use, history of hypertension, claudication (for first ever stroke), diabetes mellitus (for primary intracerebral hemorrhage), previous stroke or transient ischemic attack, use of reduced-fat or skim milk:

Eating fish >2 times/month significantly lowered the odds of a first-ever stroke (OR=0.60, 95% CI 0.36-0.99) and primary intracerebral hemorrhage (OR=0.42, 95% CI 0.19-0.90), compared to not eating fish >2 times/month.

No significant ORs were found for all strokes and ischemic stroke based on consuming fish >2 times/month.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Skerrett and Hennekens, 2003

Review

Review of observational studies, randomized trials, and biological studies

Seafood or n-3 supplements

Zhang et al., 1999

Ecological

36 countries

Data from the World Health Statistics Annual (WHO) and Food Balance Sheets (FAO)

Mortality data age-standardized to 45-74 years, and averaged over latest available 3 years

Seafood

*Included in Wang C, Chung M, Balk E, Kupelnick B, DeVine D. 2004. Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Cardiovascular Disease. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 94 (Prepared by the Tufts-New England Medical Center Evidence-based Practice Center, Boston, MA under contract no. 290-02-0022). AHRQ Publication No. 04-E009-2. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

**N = Evidence of no association or no clear association; B = Evidence of a benefit.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

 

“Ecologic/cross-sectional and case-control studies have generally shown an inverse association between consumption of fish and fish oils and stroke risk. Results from five prospective studies have been less consistent, with one showing no association, one showing a possible inverse association, and three demonstrating a significantly inverse association.”

“Consumption of fish several times per week reduces the risk of thrombotic stroke but does not increase the risk of hemorrhagic stroke.”

B

 

“Fish consumption was independently, significantly, and inversely associated with mortality from all causes, ischemic heart disease, and stroke in both sexes.” The statistics for these associations are p<0.001, 0.01<p<0.001, and 0.05<p<0.001, respectively.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

TABLE B-2c Studies on Lipid Profile

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Dunstan et al., 2003

Randomized Controlled Trial

Women (n=83)

Booked for delivery at St. John of God Hospital, Subiaco, Western Australia

Atopic pregnancy

Allergic women

No smoking, other medical problems, complicated pregnancies, preterm delivery, seafood allergy; normal diet intake did not exceed two meals of fish per week

From 20 weeks of pregnancy to delivery

n-3 supplement

Christensen et al., 1999

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men (n=35)

Women (n=25)

Medical staff, bank employees, and students at institutions in Aalborg, Denmark

No medications, no known diseases

Follow-up of 12 weeks

n-3 supplement

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Fish oil group:

1.0 g fish oil/capsule, 4 capsules/day

3.7 g n-3 PUFA/capsule

(56% DHA, 27.7% EPA)

Placebo group:

1 g olive oil/capsule, 4 capsules/day

(66.6% n-9 oleic acid, <1% n-3 PUFA)

“Levels of n-6 PUFA AA were significantly lower in the fish oil group (15.02±1.44%, p<0.001), compared with the placebo group (17.45±1.17%). There was no difference in the levels of oleic acid between the groups.”

“Interleukin-13 levels were significantly lower (geometric mean 9.61, 95% CI 5.46-16.93, p=0.025) in neonates whose mothers received fish-oil supplements in pregnancy compared to the placebo group (geometric mean 26.32, 95% CI 13.44-51.55).”

“There were no significant differences in the frequency of lymphocyte subsets between the two groups with respect to total T cells, T helper cells, T suppressor cells, NK cells, and B cells.”

B

High n-3 group:

10 capsules

6.6 g/day n-3 PUFA

(3 g EPA/2.9 g DHA)

Low n-3 group:

3 capsules n-3, 7 capsules of olive oil

2 g/day n-3 PUFA

0.9 g EPA/0.8 g DHA

Placebo group:

10 capsules

Olive oil

n-3 PUFA in granulocytes (both for EPA and DHA) and in platelets (both for EPA and DHA) were significantly higher after supplementation, compared to before supplementation, for those in the high n-3 group and the low n-3 group (p<0.01).

Plasma triacylglycerols were significantly lower after supplementation, compared to before supplementation, for those in the high n-3 group (p<0.01) and the low n-3 group (p<0.05).

The changes in DHA in granulocytes and plasma triacylglyercols after supplementation were significantly higher in the high n-3 group compared to the placebo group (p<0.05).

The changes in EPA in granulocytes and EPA and DHA in platelets were significantly higher in the high n-3 group than in the low n-3 group and the placebo group (p<0.05).

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Vericel et al., 1999

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men and women (n=20)

Aged 70-83 years

France

Diastolic blood pressure <95 mmHg and systolic blood pressure <180 mmHg

No metabolic, malignant, or degenerative diseases

Follow-up of 42 days

n-3 supplement

Leng et al., 1998*

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men and women (n=120)

Mean age about 66 years

Edinburgh, UK

Intermittent claudication on the Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire

An ankle brachial pressure index ≤0.9 in at least one limb

No clinical evidence of critical ischemia; unstable angina or a MI within the previous 3 months; severe intercurrent illnesses including severe liver disorders, malignancy, or epilepsy; concurrent treatment with anticoagulants, other oils, lithium, or phemothiazines; pregnant or actively trying to conceive; already participating in a clinical trial

Follow-up of 2 years

n-3 supplement

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

RO-PUFA treatment capsule:

600 mg oil = 150 mg DHA, 30 mg EPA, 1900 ppm alphatocopherol

Control capsule:

600 mg sunflower oil and 600 ppm alpha-tocopherol

“The composition of platelet total phospholipids was not affected by the low supplementation of RO-PUFA or sunflower oil.”

“Neither the GSH-Px activities nor the enzyme levels were affected by any supplement of oil.”

Compared to baseline, RO-PUFA significantly increased platelet phosphatidylethanolamine DHA (2.7±0.2 mol% to 3.4±0.1 mol%, p<0.001).

N

Polyunsaturated fatty acids group:

280 mg GLA, 45 mg EPA/capsule

2 capsules twice/day for first 2 weeks, 3 capsules twice daily thereafter

Placebo group:

500 mg sunflower oil

2 capsules twice/day for first 2 weeks, 3 capsules twice daily thereafter

Among completers, VLDL was significantly higher in the polyunsaturated fatty acids group at 6 months (p<0.05) and HDL was significantly higher at 24 months (p<0.01) compared to the placebo group.

At baseline, hematocrit (%) and fibrin D-dimer (ng/ml) were significantly lower in the polyunsaturated fatty acids group compared to the placebo group (p<0.05).

At 6 months, hematocrit (%) was significantly higher in the polyunsaturated fatty acids group compared to the placebo group (p<0.01).

There were no significant differences in hemostatis factors at 24 months between the two groups.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Luo et al., 1998*

Randomized Controlled Trial (crossover)

Men (n=10)

Mean age of 54 years

Patients of the Department of Diabetes outpatient clinic (diabetics)

Type II diabetes, a fasting plasma glucose of 7.84-14.0 mmol/L, HbA1c <10.5%, plasma triacylglycerol of 1.72-4.6 mmol/L

No abnormal renal, hepatic, and thyroid functions; gastrointestinal disorders

Follow-up of 2 months while on each supplement

n-3 supplement

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Fish oil group:

6 g fish oil

30% n-3 fatty acids; 18% EPA, 12% DHA

2 capsules 3 times/day

Sunflower oil group:

6 g sunflower oil

65% n-6 fatty acids; 0.2% n-3 fatty acids

2 capsules 3 times/day

Recommended to consume 55% of calories as carbohydrates, 15% as protein, 30% as fat

There were no significant differences in fasting plasma glucose, insulin, or HbA1c between the two groups.

After 2 months of sunflower oil and fish oil treatments, the fish oil treatment significantly lowered triacylglycerols and lipoprotein(a) compared to the the sunflower oil treatment (p<0.05 and p<0.02, respectively). There were no other significant differences between the two treatments in the other fasting circulating lipid and lipoprotein concentrations measured.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Dunstan et al., 1997*

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men (n=40)

Women (n=15)

Aged 30-65 years

Perth, Australia

With treated noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Nonsmokers, not taking fish-oil supplements or eating >1 fish meal/week, sedentary for the previous 6 months

Excluded if taking insulin or medication for lipid disorders; drinking >30 ml alcohol/day; had a previous history or evidence of heart, liver, or renal disease; neuropathy; retinopathy; or had asthma or any orthopedic disorder that precluded exercise participation

Follow-up of 8 weeks

Diet (includes seafood) and exercise

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Group 1:

Low-fat diet (30% energy from fat) + moderate exercise (55-65% of Vo2max)

Group 2:

Low-fat diet (≤30% energy from fat) + light exercise (heart rate <100 bpm)

Group 3:

Low-fat diet with the inclusion of 1 fish meal daily (3.6 g n-3/day) + moderate exercise (55-65% of Vo2max)

Group 4:

Low-fat diet with the inclusion of 1 fish meal daily (3.6 g n-3/day) + light exercise (heart rate <100 bpm)

After adjusting for baseline age, sex, and change in body weight:

Relative to no fish and light exercise, fish and moderate exercise (Group 3) significantly lowered serum triglycerides (−1.21±0.28; p=0.0001) and significantly raised HDL2 (0.08±0.03, p=0.02);

Relative to no fish and light exercise, fish and light exercise (Group 4) significantly lowered serum triglycerides (−1.22±0.28; p=0.0001) and significantly raised HDL2 (0.08±0.03, p=0.02); and

Relative to no fish and light exercise, no fish and moderate exercise (Group 1) significantly lowered serum triglycerides (−0.68±0.29; p=0.03).

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Schaefer et al., 1996*

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men and women (n=22)

Mean age of 63 (all >40 years, all women postmenopausal)

Plasma LDL-cholesterol within the 10th and 90th percentile for their age and sex

No medication known to affect plasma lipoprotein cencentrations; no endocrine, liver, or kidney disease

Nonsmokers, did not consume alcohol regularly

Follow-up of 24 weeks

National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Step 2 diet

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Baseline diet:

14.1±2.2 % energy from saturated fat

14.5±1.0 % energy from monounsaturated fat

4.1±0.2 % energy from LA

0.7±0.2 % energy from ALA

<0.01 % energy from AA, EPA, DHA each

High-fish diet:

4.5±0.7 % energy from saturated fat

11.6±1.4 % energy from monounsaturated fat

7.0±0.4 % energy from LA

1.9±0.6 % energy from ALA

0.1±0.1 % energy from AA

0.2±0.1 % energy from EPA

0.5±0.2 % energy from DHA

Low-fish diet:

4.0±0.4 % energy from saturated fat

10.8±0.9 % energy from monounsaturated fat

7.1±0.8 % energy from LA

2.0±0.2 % energy from ALA

<0.02 % energy from AA

<0.02 % energy from EPA

0.1±0.1 % energy from DHA

Those on the high-fish diet significantly lowered their total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, apolipoprotein A-I (p<0.0001), and postprandial tricylglycerols (p<0.05). There were no significant changes found for VLDL-C, TC:HDL-C, (triacylglycerols, lipoprotein(a), or LDL particle score.

Those on the low-fish diet significantly lowered their total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, apolipoprotein B, apolipoprotein A-I (p<0.0001), and significantly increased their LDL particle score (p<0.05). There were no significant changes found for VLDL-C, TC:HDL-C, triacylglycerols, postprandial triacylglycerols, and lipoprotein(a).

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Eritsland et al., 1995*

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men (n=523)

Women (n=78)

Aged 36-81 years

Oslo, Norway

With stenosing coronary artery disease

Referred for coronary artery bypass grafting

Follow-up of 6 months

Reference group (for serum Lp(a)):

Men (n=79)

Women (n=20)

Aged 25-81 years

Apparently healthy

Current or retired employees attending a regular health check-up

n-3 supplement

Sacks et al., 1995

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men and women (n=59)

Aged 30-75 years

Boston, MA

Had narrowing of ≥30% lumen diameter of a major coronary artery, a total cholesterol concentration <250 mg/dL, and triglyceride level <350 mg/dL

No congestive heart failure, liver, renal, or serious gastrointestinal disease, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, current cigarette smoking, or alcohol intake >14 drinks/week

Follow-up of 2.4 years

n-3 supplement

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

n-3 PUFA group:

4 capsules/day

Each capsule = 1 g n-3 PUFA (51% EPA, 32% DHA) + 3.7 IU alpha-tocopherol

Serum EPA, DHA, and total n-3 concentrations significantly increased in the n-3 PUFA group between baseline and the 6-month assessment (p<0.001). The changes in serum EPA, DHA, and total n-3 concentrations from baseline to the 6-month assessment were also significantly higher in the n-3 PUFA group compared to the control group (p<0.001).

Among those who had a baseline Lp(a) of ≥20 mg/dL, the change in serum Lp(a) levels from baseline to the 6-month assessment was significantly different in the n-3 PUFA group (29.7 mg/dL to 28.7 mg/dL) than in the control group (30.3 mg/dL to 30.8 mg/dL) (p=0.023). There were no significant differences in the change of serum Lp(a) found between the two groups among those who had a baseline Lp(a) of <20 mg/dL.

B

Fish oil group:

12 capsules/day

500 mg n-3 fatty acids/capsule (240 mg EPA, 160 mg DHA, 100 mg mostly DPA)

6 g of n-3 fatty acids/day

Control group:

12 capsules of olive oil/day

From baseline to follow-up, there was a significant increase in body weight, LDL-C, apolipoprotein B, and Lp(a), and a significant decrease in triglycerides among those in the fish oil group (p<0.01; p<0.05 for lipoprotein Lp(a)).

From baseline to follow-up there was a significant increase in body weight (p<0.01), cholesterol (p<0.05), and apolipoprotein B (p<0.01) among those in the control group.

The change in triglycerides from baseline to follow-up was significantly different among the fish oil group (−28±53 mg/dL) and the control group (6±35 mg/dL) (p<0.01).

After 2.4 years of supplementation, the fish oil group had significantly higher EPA, DPA, DHA, and EPA+DPA+DHA (p<0.0001) and significantly lower palmitic acid (p=0.048), oleic acid (p=0.0009), and arachidonic acid (p=0.001) in the adipose tissue compared to the control group.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Mori et al., 1994*

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men (n=120)

Aged 30-60 years

Perth, Australia

Eating not more than one fish meal/week or drinking more than an average of 30 mL alcohol/day (3 standard drinks)

With high-normal blood pressure and elevated serum cholesterol

No history of unstable heart, renal, or liver disease, hypercholesterolemia, asthma, or any major allergies

Follow-up of 12 weeks

Seafood and n-3 supplements

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Seven dietary groups:

40% total energy from fat and:

1 = placebo

2 = fish (1 fish meal/day)

3 = fish-oil capsules (0.8 g/day DHA, 2.6 g n-3/day)

4 = fish (1 fish meal/day) and fish-oil capsules (0.8 g/day DHA, 2.6 g n-3/day)

5 = twice the dosage of fish-oil capsules (1.6 g/day DHA, 5.2 g n-3/day)

30% total energy from fat and:

6 = control group

7 = fish (1 fish meal/day)

Fish meals included:

Greenland turbot fillets (160 g/day) = 1.5 g/day DHA, 3.5 g/day total n-3 fatty acids

Canned sardines (95 g/day) = 1.7 g/day DHA, 4.1 g/day total n-3 fatty acids

Tuna (90 g/day) = 1.3 g/day DHA, 3.2 g/day total n-3 fatty acids

Salmon (90 g/day) = 2.4 g/day DHA, 3.8 g/day total n-3 fatty acids

Among those in Groups 1-5, there were significant differences between the groups in the change in percentage of daily fat intake from polyunsaturated fatty acids (change (%) = −4.5, 0.9, −7.1, 0.9, and −1.9, respectively; p<0.001).

Among those in Groups 6-7, there were significant differences between the groups in the change in percentage of daily fat intake from polyunsaturated fatty acids (change (%) = 13.0 and 18.9, respectively; p<0.01).

Among those in Groups 1-5, there were significant differences between the groups in regards to the change in cholesterol (change (mg/d) = 124.3, −33.8, 188.3, 103.4, and 58.7, respectively; p<0.01).

There were no significant changes in % of energy from total fat, % of daily fat from monounsaturated fatty acids or saturated fatty acids, total carbohydrate, total protein, or fiber intake.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Vandongen et al., 1993

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men (n=120)

Aged 30-60 years

Perth, Australia

BMI <33 kg/m2, SBP 130-159 mmHg, DBP 80-99 mmHG, serum cholesterol 5.2-6.9 mmol/L, nonsmoking, not taking any medication, no significant illness or allergic disorder

Eating ≤1 fish meal and drinking <210 mL alcohol/week

Follow-up of 12 weeks

Seafood and n-3 supplements

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Seven dietary groups:

40% total energy from fat and:

1 = placebo

2 = fish (1 fish meal/day)

3 = fish-oil capsules (1.3 g n-3/day)

4 = fish (1 fish meal/day) and fish-oil capsules (1.3 g n-3/day)

5 = twice the dosage of fish-oil capsules (2.6 g n-3/day)

30% total energy from fat and:

6 = control group

7 = fish (1 fish meal/ day)

Fish meals included:

Greenland turbot fillets (≈160 g/day) 3.5 g/day total n-3 fatty acids

Canned sardines (95 g/day) 4.1 g/ day total n-3 fatty acids

Tuna (90 g/day) ≈3.2 g/day total n-3 fatty acids

Salmon (90 g/day) 3.8 g/day total n-3 fatty acids

A significant group effect was found for the change in heart rate (p<0.01 for supine; p = 0.06 for erect) from baseline to end of intervention.

No significant differences were found between groups in SBP, DBP, weight, 24-hour urine potassium levels, sodium, blood glucose, or blood insulin from baseline to end of intervention.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Cobiac et al., 1991*

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men (n=31)

Aged 30-60 years

Adelaide, South Australia

Mildly hyperlipidemic and normotensive

No history of heart disease, hypertension, bleeding disorders, liver or renal disorders, gout, diabetes, recent cerebrovascular accident, or obesity

No steroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin, beta-blockers, allopurinol, or cardiac glycosides

No excessive alcohol intake (>40 g/day) or smoked >20 cigarettes/day

Follow-up of 8 weeks

Seafood and n-3 supplementation

Hanninen et al., 1989*

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men (n=100)

Mean age of 23.5 years

Kuopio, Finland

Healthy students

Follow-up of 12 weeks

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Fish treatment:

1 kg (raw) Atlantic salmon + 150 g sardines in sild oil per week

4.5 g EPA+DHA/day

Fish-oil treatment:

105 g MaxEPA/week

4.6 g EPA+DHA/day

Continued with meats as during baseline

Control diet:

Continuation of baseline diet

After the fish treatment (compared to baseline values), cholesterol, triglycerides, VLDL-C, LDL-C, VLDL triglycerides, Apo A-I, and Apo A-II were significantly lower and HDL, Apo A-I:Apo A-II, and HDL-C:Apo A-I were significantly higher (p<0.05).

After the fish-oil treatment (compared to baseline values), triglycerides, VLDL-C, VLDL triglycerides, Apo A-I, Apo-AII, and Apo A-I:Apo B were significantly lower, and HDL-C, Apo A-I:Apo A-II, and HDL-C:Apo A-I were significantly higher (p<0.05).

After the control treatment (compared to baseline values), lipids, LDL-C, and Apo A-I were significantly lower and HDL-C:Apo A-I was significantly higher (p<0.05).

The changes in triglycerides, VLDL-C, VLDL triglycerides, and HDL-C:Apo A-I in the fish and fish-oil groups were significantly greater than the changes in the control group (p<0.05, p=0.002 for HDL-C:Apo A-I); the change in HDL-C was significantly greater in the fish-oil group than in the control group (p<0.05).

The changes in fibrinogen, thromboxane, and bleeding time after treatment were significantly different in the fish group compared to the control group (p<0.05).

B

Fish meal groups:

0.9, 1.5, 2.3, or 3.8 fish meals/week

Controls:

1 fish meal/2 weeks

Meals = Finnish freshwater fish (rainbow trout, vendace, and perch) and brackish water fish (Baltic herring)

Portion size = 150 g

Those who ate 3.8 fish meals/week lowered their serum triglycerides and apolipoprotein B significantly (p<0.02 and p<0.05, respectively) after eating the fish diet for 12 weeks; there were no significant changes after 12 weeks for those who ate 0.9, 1.5, and 2.3 fish meals/week.

There were no significant changes in serum cholesterol, serum apolipoprotein A-I, hemoglobin, thrombocytes, vitamin E, or vitamin A after eating the fish diets for 12 weeks.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Dewailly et al., 2001

Cohort

Men and women (n=426)

Aged 18-74 years

Permanent residents of Nunavik, Canada

Inuit

Excluded households of only non-Inuit persons, persons not related to an Inuit, and institutionalized persons

Plasma phospholipid composition; seafood; diet

*Included in Balk E, Chung M, Lichtenstein A, Chew P, Kupelnick B, Lawrence A, DeVine D, Lau J. 2004. Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Intermediate Markers of Cardiovascular Disease. Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 93. (Prepared by the Tufts-New England Medical Center Evidence-based Practice Center, Boston, MA). AHRQ Publication No. 04-E010-1. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

**B = Evidence of a benefit; N = Evidence of no association or no clear association.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Plasma phospholipids = relative percentages of total fatty acids by weight

Fish and marine mammal intake from 24-hour recalls

Consumption of traditional and market food stuffs from a food frequency questionnaire

After adjusting for age, sex, waist girth, smoking status, and alcohol intake:

EPA, DHA, EPA+DHA, EPA:AA, and n-3:n-6 are positively associated with total cholesterol (p=0.0001);

EPA (p=0.005), DHA (p=0.0003), EPA+DHA (p=0.0007), EPA:AA (p=0.002), and n-3:n-6 (p=0.003) are positively associated with LDL;

EPA (p=p=0.0001), DHA (p=0.004), EPA+DHA (p=0.0001), EPA:AA (p=0.0001), and n-3:n-6 (p=0.0001) are positively associated with HDL;

EPA (p=0.04) and EPA:AA (p=0.05) are negatively associated with total cholesterol:HDL;

EPA (p=0.0001), EPA+DHA (p=0.0003), EPA:AA (p=0.0002), and n-3:n-6 (p=0.001) are negatively associated with triacylglycerols; and

EPA (p=0.02), DHA (p=0.01), EPA+DHA (p=0.008), EPA:AA (p=0.02), and n-3:n-6 (p=0.008) are positively associated with glucose.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

TABLE B-2d Studies on Blood Pressure

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Hooper et al., 2005

Cochrane Review

7 studies (2743 participants)

After 6 months of supplementation

n-3 supplement

Geleijnse et al., 2002*

Meta-analysis

36 RCTs (22 with double-blinded design)

Adult study populations (mean age ≥18 years)

Published after 1966

No sick/hospitalized populations, including renal and diabetic patients

Mean trial duration of 11.7 weeks (range = 3-52 weeks)

n-3 supplement

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

 

“Neither [systolic or diastolic blood pressure] were significantly affected by omega-3 supplementation” (SBP mean difference = 1.03 mmHg, 95% CI −3.30 to 1.25, p=0.18; DBP mean difference = −0.23 mmHg, 95% CI 1.10-0.64, p=0.92).

N

Doses of fish oil:

<1.0 g/day in 1 trial

1.0-1.9 g/day in 5 trials

2.0-2.9 g/day in 4 trials

3.0-15.0 g/day in 26 trials

mean dose = 3.7 g/day

In the univariate analysis:

Based on all trials, fish oil decreased SBP and DBP significantly more among those >45 years of age compared to those ≤45 years of age (p=0.023 for SBP and p=0.020 for DBP) and in those with hypertension compared to those without hypertension (p=0.008 for SBP and p=0.041 for DBP). Fish oil also decreased SBP and DBP more in populations with males and females compared to those with only males and among those with a BMI >26.8kg/m2 compared to those with BMI ≤26.8 kg/m2, but the differences were not significant; and

Based on double-blinded trials, fish oil decreased SBP and DBP significantly more among those with hypertension compared to those without hypertension (p=0.005 for SBP and p=0.010 for DBP). Fish oil also decreased SBP and DBP more among those >45 years of age compared to those ≤45 years of age; in populations with males and females compared to those with only males, and among those with a BMI >26.8kg/m2 compared to those with BMI ≤26.8 kg/m2, but the differences were not significant.

After adjusting for age, percent males, baseline BP, study design, and fish oil dose:

Fish oil decreased SBP and DBP more among those >45 years of age compared to those ≤45 years of age, in populations with males and females compared to those with only males, in those with hypertension compared to those without hypertension, and among those with a BMI >26.8kg/m2 compared to those with BMI ≤26.8 kg/m2, but the differences were not significant.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Ness et al., 1999

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men (n=2033)

Aged <70 years

From 21 hospitals in South Wales and the south west of England

Diet and Reinfarction Trial (DART)

Suffered from recent MI

Excluded if they already intended to eat one of the study diets, if they had serious illnesses (e.g., diabetes, cancer, or renal function), if they were being considered for cardiac surgery, if they were participating in a local cohort study, if they planned to live outside the study area, if they were averse to one of the proposed diets

Follow-up of 2 years

Dietary advice

Vericel et al., 1999

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men and women (n=20)

Aged 70-83 years

France

Diastolic blood pressure <95 mmHg and systolic blood pressure <180 mmHg

No metabolic, malignant, or degenerative diseases

Follow-up of 42 days

n-3 supplement

Leng et al., 1998*

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men and women (n=120)

Mean age about 66 years

Edinburgh

Intermittent claudication on the Edinburgh Claudication Questionnaire

An ankle brachial pressure index ≤0.9 in at least one limb

No clinical evidence of critical ischemia; unstable angina or a myocardial infarction within the previous 3 months; severe intercurrent illnesses including severe liver disorders, malignancy, or epilepsy; concurrent treatment with anticoagulants, other oils, lithium, or phemothiazines; pregnant or actively trying to conceive; already participating in a clinical trial

Follow-up of 2 years

n-3 supplement

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Eight dietary regimes:

1 = Fat advice

2 = Fish advice

3 = Fiber advice

4 = Fat and fish advice

5 = Fat and fiber advice

6 = Fish and fiber advice

7 = Fat, fish, and fiber advice

8 = No advice

After adjusting for 5-year age group and BP at baseline:

At 6 months, those who received fish advice had lower SBP and DBP than those who did not receive fish advice (difference in SBP = −0.61, 95% CI −2.15 to 0.92 and difference in DBP = −0.50, 95% CI −1.47 to 0.46), but the differences were not significant; and

At 2 years, those who received fish advice had higher SBP and DBP than those who did not receive fish advice (difference in SBP = 0.40, 95% CI −1.33 to 2.13 and difference in DBP = 0.19, 95% CI −0.88 to 1.26), but the differences were not significant.

B

RO-PUFA treatment capsule:

600 mg oil = 150 mg DHA, 30 mg EPA, 1900 ppm alphatocopherol

Control capsule:

600 mg sunflower oil and 600 ppm alpha-tocopherol

Compared to baseline, RO-PUFA significantly lowered systolic blood pressure (145.5±5.1 mmHg to 131.5±4.5 mmHg, p<0.001).

There was no significant change in diastolic blood pressure.

B

Polyunsaturated fatty acids group:

280 mg GLA, 45 mg EPA/capsule

2 capsules twice/day for first 2 weeks, 3 capsules twice/day thereafter

Placebo group:

500 mg sunflower oil

2 capsules twice/day for first 2 weeks, 3 capsules twice/day thereafter

There were no significant differences in systolic blood pressure or diastolic blood pressure between the two groups at baseline or at 6 months.

At 24 months systolic blood pressure was significantly lower in the polyunsaturated fatty acids group compared to the placebo group (150.1±3.5 mmHg vs. 161.8±3.1 mmHg, p≤0.05).

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Vandongen et al., 1993

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men (n=120)

Aged 30-60 years

Perth, Australia

BMI <33 kg/m2, SBP 130-159 mmHg, DBP 80-99 mmHG, serum cholesterol 5.2-6.9 mmol/L, nonsmoking, not taking any medication, no significant illness or allergic disorder

Eating ≤1 fish meal and drinking <210 mL alcohol/week

Follow-up of 12 weeks

Seafood and n-3 supplements

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Seven dietary groups:

40% total energy from fat and:

1 = placebo

2 = fish (1 fish meal/day)

3 = fish-oil capsules (1.3 g n-3/day)

4 = fish (1 fish meal/day) and fish-oil capsules (1.3 g n-3/day)

5 = twice the dosage of fish-oil capsules (2.6 g n-3/day)

30% total energy from fat and:

6 = control group

7 = fish (1 fish meal/ day)

Fish meals included:

Greenland turbot fillets (≈160 g/day) ≈3.5 g/day total n-3 fatty acids

Canned sardines (≈95 g/day) ≈4.1 g/day total n-3 fatty acids

Tuna (≈90 g/day) ≈3.2 g/day total n-3 fatty acids

Salmon (≈90 g/day) 3.8 g/day total n-3 fatty acids

There was a significant difference in change in heart rate (bpm) from baseline until the end of the intervention between the groups (p<0.01). Heart rate went down in Groups 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 and heart rate went up in Groups 1 and 6.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Cobiac et al., 1991*

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men (n=31)

Aged 30-60 years

Adelaide, South Australia

Mildly hyperlipidemic and normotensive

No history of heart disease, hypertension, bleeding disorders, liver or renal disorders, gout, diabetes, recent cerebrovascular accident, or obesity

No steroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin, beta-blockers, allopurinol, or cardiac glycosides

No excessive alcohol intake (>40 g/day) or smoked >20 cigarettes/day Follow-up of 8 weeks

Seafood and n-3 supplementation

Dewailly et al., 2001

Cohort

Men and women (n=426)

Aged 18-74 years

Permanent residents of Nunavik, Canada

Inuit

Excluded households of only non-Inuit persons, persons not related to an Inuit, and institutionalized persons

Plasma phospholipid composition; seafood; diet

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Fish treatment:

1 kg (raw) Atlantic salmon + 150 g sardines in sild oil per week

4.5 g EPA+DHA/day

Fish-oil treatment:

105 g MaxEPA/week

4.6 g EPA+DHA/day

Continued with meats as during baseline

Control diet:

Continuation of baseline diet

After fish treatment, compared to baseline values, systolic and diastolic blood pressure were significantly lower (p<0.05).

After the fish-oil treatment, compared to baseline values, systolic blood pressure was significantly lower (p<0.05).

After the control treatment, compared to baseline values, diastolic blood pressure was significantly lower (p<0.05).

There were no significant differences between the changes in the three treatment groups.

B

Plasma phospholipids = relative percentages of total fatty acids by weight

Fish and marine mammal intake from 24-hour recalls

Consumption of traditional and market food stuffs from a food frequency questionnaire

After adjusting for age, sex, waist girth, smoking status, and alcohol intake, no significant associations were found between EPA, DHA, EPA+DHA, EPA: AA or n-3:n-6 and systolic blood pressure or diastolic blood pressure.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Appleby et al., 2002

Cross-sectional

Men (n=2351)

Women (n=8653)

Aged 20-78 years

UK

European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)—Oxford Cohort

Free of cancer at baseline

Diet

*Included in Balk E, Chung M, Lichtenstein A, Chew P, Kupelnick B, Lawrence A, DeVine D, Lau J. 2004. Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Intermediate Markers of Cardiovascular Disease. Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 93. (Prepared by the Tufts-New England Medical Center Evidence-based Practice Center, Boston, MA). AHRQ Publication No. 04-E010-1. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Four diet groups:

Meat eaters

Fish eaters = ate fish but no meat

Vegetarians = ate neither meat nor fish but did eat dairy products and/or eggs

Vegans = did not eat any meat, fish, eggs, or dairy products

After adjusting for age, there were significant differences between the diet groups in regards to SBP among men (p<0.005), SBP among women (p<0.005), DBP among men (p<0.005) and DBP among women (p<0.0001).

After adjusting for age and BMI, the only significant difference in blood pressure was for DBP among women (p<0.01).

After adjusting for age, BMI, alcohol intake and vigorous exercise (for men), and hormone exposure (for women), the only significant difference in blood pressure was for DBP among women (p<0.01).

After adjusting for age, BMI, alcohol intake and vigorous exercise (for men), hormone exposure (for women), protein, carbohydrate, total fat, saturated fat and polyunsaturated fat, energy, P/S ratio, and NSP intake, the only significant difference in blood pressure was for DBP among women (p=0.02).

After adjusting for age, BMI, alcohol intake and vigorous exercise (for men), hormone exposure (for women), protein, carbohydrate, total fat, saturated fat and polyunsaturated fat, energy, P/S ratio, and NSP intake, sodium (from food only), potassium, calcium, and magnesium intakes, the only significant difference in blood pressure was for DBP among women (p=0.02).

After adjusting for age, the prevalence of self-reported hypertension for meat eaters, fish eaters, vegetarians, and vegans was 15.0%, 9.8%, 9.8%, and 5.8% for men, respectively, and 12.1%, 9.6%, 8.9%, and 7.7% for women, respectively.

After adjusting for age and BMI, the prevalence of self-reported hypertension for meat eaters, fish eaters, vegetarians, and vegans was 12.9%, 9.3%, 9.5%, and 6.1% for men, respectively, and 10.6%, 9.7%, 8.7%, and 8.3% for women, respectively.

B

**N = Evidence of no association or no clear association; B = Evidence of a benefit.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

TABLE B-2e Studies on Arrhythmia

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Leaf et al., 2003

Review

Clinical trials (n=6 analyses)

Animal and laboratory studies (for potential mechanisms)

n-3 supplement

Christensen et al., 1999

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men (n=35)

Women (n=25)

Medical staff, bank employees, and students at institutions in Aalborg, Denmark

No medications, no known diseases

12 weeks of follow-up

n-3 supplement

Christensen et al., 1996

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men and women (n=49)

Aged ≤75 years

Aalborg Hospital, Denmark

Discharged after MI and ventricular ejection fraction <0.40

No pacemakers or permanent tachyarrhythmias, or serious non-cardiac disease

Follow-up of 12 weeks

n-3 supplement

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

 

From the randomized controlled trials, “the evidence has been strengthened that fish oil fatty acids can prevent sudden cardiac death in humans, and this may prove to be their major cardiac benefit.”

From the randomized controlled trials, there were no significant associations found between fish oil fatty acids and the reduction of nonfatal MIs.

“If there is a family history of sudden cardiac death, then the supplement should be increased to 1 to 2 g of EPA plus DHA.”

“These n-3 fatty acids are antiarrhythmis and can prevent sudden cardiac death in humans.”

B

High n-3 group:

10 capsules

6.6 g/day n-3 PUFA

3 g EPA/2.9 g DHA

Low n-3 group:

3 capsules n-3, 7 capsules of olive oil

2 g/day n-3 PUFA

0.9 g EPA/0.8 g DHA

Placebo group:

10 capsules

Olive oil

There were no significant differences between the three diet groups in regards to the changes in six heart rate variability indexes from before to after supplementation.

B

n-3 fatty acid group:

5.2 g n-3 PUFA

4.3 g EPA and DHA

Placebo group:

Olive oil

After n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid treatment, the mean heart rate variability, defined as standard deviation of all normal RR intervals in 24-hour Holter recording, was significantly higher compared to baseline (124 ms vs. 115 ms, p=0.04).

The mean difference in heart rate variability, defined as standard deviation of all normal RR intervals in 24-hour Holter recording, was significantly different after n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid treatment (mean difference = −8.3, 95% CI −16 to −−1) compared to after the control treatment (mean difference = 9.4, 95% CI −2 to 20, p=0.01).

A

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Frost and Vestergaard, 2005

Cohort

Men (n=22,528)

Women (n=25,421)

Aged 50-64 years

Born in Denmark, living in the Copenhagen and Aarhus areas

No previous cancer diagnosis in the Danish Cancer Registry

No hospitalization before baseline with endocrine diseases or cardiovascular diseases other than hypertension

Follow-up of 5.7 years (128,131 person-years for men and 147,251 person-years for women)

Seafood

Christensen et al., 1997

Cross-sectional

Men and women (n=52)

Aged 48-75 years

Discharged after MI from Aalborg Hospital, Denmark

Echocardiography performed within the first week after MI

Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%

No implanted pacemaker, no permanent tachyarrhythmias, no serious noncardiac disease

Using baseline data from Christensen et al., 1996

Platelet fatty acids; seafood

*B = Evidence of a benefit; A = Evidence of an adverse effect; N = Evidence of no association or no clear association.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Frequency of fish consumption:

Never, <1 time/month, 1 time/month, 2-3 times/month, 1 time/week, 2-4 times/week, 5-6 times/week, 1 time/day, 2-3 times/day, 4-5 times/day, 6-7 times/day, ≥8 times/day

Quintiles of n-3 PUFA from fish (g/day):

Quintile 1 = 0.16±0.08

Quintile 2 = 0.36±0.06

Quintile 3 = 0.52±0.07

Quintile 4 = 0.74±0.10

Quintile 5 = 1.29±0.47

After adjusting for age, sex, height, BMI, smoking, consumption of alcohol, total energy intake, systolic blood pressure, treatment for hypertension, total serum cholesterol, and level of education:

Those in Quintile 5 of n-3 PUFA from fish had a significantly higher hazard rate ratio of atrial fibrillation or flutter, when compared to those in Quintile 1 (HRR=1.34, 95% CI 1.02-1.76); and

The association between n-3 PUFA from fish and risk of atrial fibrillation or flutter was not significant for any other quintiles when compared to Quintile 1, however there was a positive trend (p=0.006).

N

3 groups of DHA content in platelets:

1 = <2.26%

2 = 2.26-3.14%

3 = >3.14%

Fish intake:

1 = 0 times/week

2 = 1 time/week

3 = ≥2 times/week

The standard deviation of all normal RR intervals in the entire 24-hour recording was higher in those who ate fish at least 1 time/week (122 ms for those who ate fish 1 time/week and 119 ms for those who ate fish ≥2 times/week), compared to those who ate fish 0 times per week (103 ms), but these differences were not significant.

The standard deviations of all normal RR intervals in the entire 24-hour recording for those in the first, second, and third tertile of DHA contents in platelets were approximately 98 ms, 116 ms, and 140 ms, respectively.

A

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

TABLE B-2f Studies on Other Cardiac Indicators

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Agren et al., 1997*

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men (n=55)

Healthy students

Kuopio, Finland

Follow-up of 15 weeks

Seafood and n-3 supplementation

Cobiac et al., 1991*

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men (n=31)

Aged 30-60 years

Adelaide, South Australia

Mildly hyperlipidemic and normotensive

No history of heart disease, hypertension, bleeding disorders, liver or renal disorders, gout, diabetes, recent cerebrovascular accident, or obesity

No steroids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, aspirin, beta-blockers, allopurinol, or cardiac glycosides

No excessive alcohol intake (>40 g/day) or who smoked >20 cigarettes/day

Follow-up of 8 weeks

Seafood and n-3 supplementation

*Included in Balk E, Chung M, Lichtenstein A, Chew P, Kupelnick B, Lawrence A, DeVine D, Lau J. 2004. Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Intermediate Markers of Cardiovascular Disease. Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 93. (Prepared by the Tufts-New England Medical Center Evidence-based Practice Center, Boston, MA). AHRQ Publication No. 04-E010-1. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

** N = Evidence of no association or no clear association; B = Evidence of a benefit.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Fish-diet group:

4.30±0.50 fish containing meals/week

0.38±0.04 g EPA and 0.67±0.098 g DHA/day

Fish-oil group:

4 g/day

1.33 g EPA and 0.95 g DHA/day

DHA-oil group:

4 g/day

1.68 g DHA/day

The change in Factor X (% of normal) from baseline to 15 weeks was significantly greater in the fish-diet group compared to the control group (p<0.05).

The change in collagen (50 µg/ml) from baseline to 15 weeks was significantly greater in the fish-diet group and the fish-oil group when compared to the controls (p<0.05).

No other significant associations were found between the diet groups with regards to the change in PT (ratio), APTT (ratio), Factor VII (% of normal), Factor X (% of normal), fibrinogen (g/l), prothrombin fragment 1+2 (nmol/L), tissue factor pathway inhibitor (ng/mL), platelet aggregation (%T), ADP (2.0 µmol/L), ADP (5.0 µmol/L), and collagen (50 µg/L).

N

Fish treatment:

1 kg (raw) Atlantic salmon + 150 g sardines in sild oil per week

4.5 g EPA+DHA/day

Fish-oil treatment:

105 g MaxEPA/week

4.6 g EPA+DHA/day

Continued with meats as during baseline

Control diet:

Continuation of baseline diet

The changes in fibrinogen and thromboxane were significantly lower and the change in bleeding time was significantly longer in the fish-diet group compared to the control diet group (p<0.05).

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

TABLE B-2g Studies on Diabetes

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Dunstan et al., 1999*

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men and women (n=55)

Mean age about 53 years

Western Australia

Nonsmoking, treated type II diabetes

Fasting serum triglyceride >1.8 mmol/L and/or HDL-C <1.0 mmol/L and BMI <36.0 kg/m2

Follow-up of 8 weeks

Diet (includes seafood) and exercise

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Group 1:

Low-fat diet (≤30% energy from fat) + moderate exercise (55-65% of Vo2max)

Group 2:

Low-fat diet (≤30% energy from fat) + light exercise (heart rate <100 bpm)

Group 3:

Low-fat diet with the inclusion of 1 fish meal daily (3.6 g n-3/day) + moderate exercise (55-65% of Vo2max)

Group 4:

Low-fat diet with the inclusion of 1 fish meal daily (3.6 g n-3/day) + light exercise (heart rate <100 bpm)

The change in erythrocyte omega-3 fatty acids from baseline to end of intervention were significantly different for both the fish and moderate exercise (Group 3) and the fish and light exercise (Group 4) compared to the controls (p<0.05).

The change in plasma tPa antigen from baseline to end of intervention were significantly different for the fish and moderate exercise (Group 3), fish and light exercise (Group 4), and no fish and moderate exercise (Group 1) groups compared to the controls (p<0.05).

The change in erythrocyte omega-6 fatty acids from baseline to end of intervention were significantly different for both the fish and moderate exercise (Group 3) and the fish and light exercise (Group 4) compared to the controls (p<0.05).

The change in plasma factor VII from baseline to end of intervention was significantly different for the fish and light exercise group compared to the control group (p<0.05).

There were no significant differences in change in plasma PAI-1 antigen or change in plasma fibrinogen from baseline to end of intervention for the three other treatment groups compared to the controls.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Mori et al., 1999*

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men and women (n=63)

Aged 40-70 years

Royal Perth Hospital, Australia

Nonsmoking men and postmenopausal women

Overweight, BMI >25, systolic blood pressure 125-180 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure <110 mmHg

Receiving antihypertensive treatment for ≥3 months

No lipid-lowering or antiinflammatory drugs, no more than 1 fish meal/week, drank <175 g alcohol/week

Follow-up of 16 weeks

Seafood; diet

Sirtori et al., 1998*

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men and women (n=935)

Aged 45-75 for men

Aged 55-80 for women

Italy (63 clinical groups)

Presenting with hyperlipoproteinemias type IIb or IV, associated with at least one further risk factor

No severe intercurrent ailments, kidney or renal disease, intestinal malabsorptions, duodenal ulcer nonresponsive to therapy, BMI ≥30, history of vascular or nonvascular brain disease, severe hyperlipidemia needing drug treatment, severe hypertension, myocardial infarction in the preceding 3 months, or unstable angina

Follow-up of 1 year

n-3 supplement

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Control group = weight-maintaining diet

Fish group = weight-maintaining diet + fish daily (about 3.65 n-3/day)

Weight loss group = energy restricted diet (to achieve 5-8 kg weight loss)

Fish + weight loss group = energy restricted diet + fish daily

From baseline to end of intervention, the fish + weight loss diet significantly increased plasma phospholipid n-3 fatty acids (p<0.0001) and significantly decreased plasma phospholipid n-6 fatty acids (p<0.0001), fasting insulin (p<0.05), and insulin AUC (p<0.05) compared to the control diet.

From baseline to end of intervention, the fish diet (with weight maintenance) significantly increased plasma phospholipid n-3 fatty acids (p<0.0001) and plasma phospholipid n-6 fatty acids (p<0.0001) compared to the control group.

From baseline to end of intervention, the change in fasting insulin levels and insulin AUC levels was significantly different in the fish group compared to the weight loss group and the fish + weight loss group (p<0.05).

There was no association found between diet group and change in fasting glucose or glucose AUC.

N

For first 2 months:

Group 1 = 1530 mg EPA/1050 mg DHA

Group 2 = olive oil placebo

After 2 months until 6 months:

Group 1 = 1020 mg EPA/700 mg DHA

Group 2 = olive oil placebo

Open phase from 6-12 months:

2 g/day of n-3 ethyl esters

No statistical differences could be detected between the two groups in terms of fasting glucose levels, Hb AIc and insulinemia after 1 year of treatment.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Grundt et al., 1995*

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men (n=51)

Women (n=6)

Aged 18-70 years

Stavanger, Norway

Outpatient center

Has combined hyperlipidemia

No dietary supplementation or medication containing omega-3 fatty acids during the run-in period, no antihyperlipemic medication

No MI or other serious disease occurring within 3 months of enrollment, known diabetes mellitus, serious psychological disease, known drug or alcohol abuse, pregnancy or lactation

Follow-up of 12 weeks

n-3 supplement

Kesavulu et al., 2002

Trial

Men and women (n=34)

Nonobese, type II diabetic

On oral antidiabetic drugs, but not on lipid lowering drugs or antioxidant therapy

Normotensive; no other clinical complications other than diabetes, no diabetic complications

Follow-up of 3 months

n-3 supplement

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Treatment:

2 g concentrated ethylester compound

85% EPA/DHA

Control:

2 g concentrated ethylester compound

85% corn oil

There were no statistical differences between the two groups or within the groups (between 2 weeks before treatment and after 12 weeks of treatment) with regards to serum glucose, plasma insulin, plasma proinsulin, insulin:glucose ratio, and proinsulin:glucose ratio.

N

Group 1 diabetics:

1 month of antidiabetic drugs alone

2 months of omega-3 supplement (1080 mg EPA and 720 mg DHA/day) along with the antidiabetic drugs

Group 2 diabetics:

3 months of antidiabetic drugs alone

Group 3:

Non-diabetic controls

After combined therapy, fasting blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin were significantly higher in the Group 1 diabetics than in the controls (p<0.001).

After 3 months of antidiabetic treatment, there were no significant differences in fasting blood glucose and glycated hemoglobin between Group 2 diabetics and the controls.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Madsen et al., 2001*

Cross-sectional

Men (n=171)

Women (n=98)

Aged 39-77 years

Aalborg, Denmark

Referred for coronary angiography because of clinical suspicion of CAD; clinically stable

No acute myocardial infarction in past 6 months, nonischemic cardiomyopathy, pacemaker, or permanent tachyarrhythmias

PUFA in granulocyte membranes; seafood

*Included in Balk E, Chung M, Lichtenstein A, Chew P, Kupelnick B, Lawrence A, DeVine D, Lau J. 2004. Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Intermediate Markers of Cardiovascular Disease. Summary, Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 93. (Prepared by the Tufts-New England Medical Center Evidence-based Practice Center, Boston, MA). AHRQ Publication No. 04-E010-1. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

**B = Evidence of a benefit; N = Evidence of no association or no clear association.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion**

Fish Score: (sum for lunch and dinner, can range from 2-12)

1 = never eating fish

2 = eating fish 1 time/month

3 = eating fish 2-3 times/month

4 = eating fish 1 time/week

5 = eating fish 2-3 times/week

6 = eating fish at least 1 time/day

“Subjects with CRP levels in the lower quartiles had significantly higher contents of DHA in granulocytes than subjects with CRP levels in the upper quartile” (p=0.02).

There were no significant associations found between CRP and LA, ALA, AA, EPA, or DPA content in granulocyte membranes or between CRP and fish score.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

TABLE B-2h Studies on Adult Asthma and Allergies

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Troisi et al., 1995

Cohort

Women (n=77,866)

Aged 30-55 years

US nurses

Nurses’ Health Study

No diagnosed cancer, CVD, diabetes, emphysema, chronic bronchitis, or asthma before or at time of questionnaire

Follow-up of 10 years

Dietary total fat and n-3 intake

Huang et al., 2001

Cross-sectional

Men (n=582)

Women (n=584)

Aged 13-17 years

Taiwan

Uninstitutionalized

The National Nutritional Survey (1993-1996)

Seafood; diet

* N = Evidence of no association or no clear association; B = Evidence of a benefit.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Quintiles of total fat intake (median):

1 = 51.9 g

2 = 62.7 g

3 = 69.9 g

4 = 77.0 g

5 = 87.4 g

Quintiles of omega-3 (median):

1 = 0.05 g

2 = 0.09 g

3 = 0.13 g

4 = 0.21 g

5 = 0.36 g

After adjusting for age, smoking, BMI, area of residence, number of physician’s visits, and quintiles of energy intake:

There were no significant associations found between total fat intake, saturated fat intake, or omega-3 fat intake and the risk of asthma;

Those in Quintile 3 of monounsaturated fat intake (median = 28.6 g) had a significantly lower RR of asthma than those in Quintile 1 (median = 20.1 g) (RR=0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.93); and

Those in Quintiles 2 and 4 of LA intake (median = 6 g and 11.1 g, respectively) had significantly lower RR of asthma than those in Quintile 1 (median = 4.49 g) (RR=0.71, 95% CI 0.57-0.89; RR=0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.93; respectively).

N

Quartiles of fish intake, absolute amounts unspecified

There were no significant differences found between the quartiles of all fish, shellfish, other seafood intake and prevalence of physician-diagnosed asthma (p=0.82, p=0.12, p=0.99, respectively).

There was a significant difference among the quartiles of oily fish and the prevalence of physician-diagnosed asthma (quartile 1 = 1.5%, quartile 2 = 2.5%, quartile 3 = 4.6%, and quartile 4 = 4.9%; p=0.01).

There were no significant differences found between the quartiles of all fish, oily fish, shellfish, other seafood intake and prevalence of physician-diagnosed allergic rhinitis (p=0.39, p=0.65, p=0.45, p=0.15, respectively).

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

TABLE B-2i Studies on Cancer

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Stolzenberg-Solomon et al., 2002

Randomized Controlled Trial

Men (n=27,111)

Aged 50-69 years

Southwestern Finland

Smoked ≥5 cigarettes/day

Alpha-tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention (ATBC) Study

No history of malignancy other than nonmelanoma cancer of the skin or carcinoma in situ, severe angina upon exertion, chronic renal insufficiency, liver cirrhosis, chronic alcoholism, receipt of anticoagulant therapy, other medical problems which might limit long-term participation, and current use of supplements containing vitamin E (>20 mg/day), vitamin A (>20,000 IU/day), or beta-carotene (>6 mg/day)

Follow-up of up to 13 years (260,006 person-years)

Seafood; dietary fatty acids

MacLean et al., 2006

Review

Part of a larger systematic literature review

Cohorts (n=20 cohorts; 38 articles)

11 different types of cancer

Seafood; dietary fatty acids

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Randomized to 50 mg/day of alpha-tocopherol, 20 mg/day of beta-carotene, both, or placebo

Quantiles of fish intake and n-3 fish oil intake, absolute amount unspecified

After adjusting for energy intake, age, and years of smoking, there were no significant associations found between quantities of fish intake or quantiles of n-3 fish oil intake and the risk of pancreatic cancer.

N

 

“For each breast, lung, and prostate cancer, there were significant associations for both increased and decreased risk and far more estimates that did not demonstrate any association.”

“No trend was found across many different cohorts and many different categories of omega-3 fatty acid consumption to suggest that omega-3 fatty acids reduce overall cancer risk.”

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Terry et al., 2003

Review

7 cohort studies on breast cancer

8 cohort studies on prostate cancer

1 cohort study on endometrial cancer

19 case-control studies on breast cancer

9 case-control studies on prostate cancer

7 case-control studies on endometrial cancer

5 case-control studies on ovarian cancer

Seafood, n-3 supplement, serum phospholipids, adipose tissue, and erythrocyte membrane fatty acids

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

 

“The development and progression of breast and prostate cancers appear to be affected by processes in which EPA and DHA play important roles.” However, “whether the consumption of fish containing marine fatty acids can alter the risk of these cancers or of other hormone-dependent cancers is unclear.”

“Although there is ample evidence from in vitro and animal studies that these essential fats can inhibit the progression of tumors in various organs, particularly the breast and prostate, the evidence from epidemiologic studies is less clear.”

“Although most of the studies did not show an association between fish consumption or marine fatty acid intake and the risk of hormone-related cancers, the results of the few studies from populations with a generally high intake of marine fatty acids are encouraging.”

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Norat et al., 2005

Cohort

Men and women (n=478,040)

Aged 35-70 years

23 centers in 10 European countries

European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)

Recruited from general population

Free of cancer at baseline, other than nonmelanoma skin cancer

Average follow-up of 4.8 years (2,279,075 person-years)

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Categories of fish intake:

1 = <10 g/day

2 = 10-20 g/day

3 = 20-40 g/day

4 = 40-80 g/day

5 = ≥80 g/day

After adjusting for age, sex, energy from nonfat sources, energy from fat sources, height, weight, occupational physical activity, smoking status, dietary fiber, alcohol intake, and stratified for center:

Those in the 4th and 5th categories of fish intake had a significantly lower HR of colorectal cancer than those in the 1st category (HR=0.67, 95% CI 0.56-0.82; and HR=0.69, 95% CI 0.54-0.88, respectively). The HR for the 2nd and 3rd categories of fish intake were also lower compared to the 1st category, but they were not significant;

Those in the 4th and 5th categories of fish intake had a significantly lower HR of rectal cancer than those in the 1st category (HR=0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.88; and HR=0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.76, respectively). The HR for the 2nd and 3rd categories of fish intake were also lower compared to the 1st category, but they were not significant;

Those in the 4th category of fish intake had a significantly lower HR of colon cancer than those in the 1st category (HR=0.69, 95% CI 0.54-0.88). The HR for the 2nd, 3rd, and 5th categories of fish intake were also lower compared to the 1st category, but they were not significant; and

Every 100 g increase in daily fish intake significantly lowered the HR for colorectal cancer (HR=0.70, 95% CI 0.57-0.87), colon cancer (HR=0.76, 95% CI 0.59-0.99), and rectal cancer (HR=0.61, 95% CI 0.43-0.87).

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Allen et al., 2004

Cohort

Men (n=18,115)

Mean age at entry was 51 years

Mean age at diagnosis was 75 years

Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan

Life Span Study/The Adult Health Study

In Hiroshima or Nagasaki during the time of the bombs and who were residents of one of the cities in the 1950 census, or not present in either city at the time of the bombs

No prostate cancer at baseline

Average follow-up of 16.9 years (252,602 person-years)

Seafood

English et al., 2004

Cohort

Men and women (n=37,112)

Aged 27-75 years

Melbourne, Australia

The Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study

Deliberately recruited Italian and Greek migrants

Free of colorectal cancer, diabetes, a heart attack, or angina at baseline

Average follow-up of 9 years

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Scores of intake for each food:

1 = Missing or <2 times/week

2 = 2-4 times/week

3 = Almost daily

Total fish/broiled fish intake:

Low = Score of 2

Intermediate = Score of 3-4

High = Score of ≥5

After adjusting for age, calendar period, city of residence, radiation dose, and education level:

Those who ate fish almost daily had a significantly higher RR of prostate cancer compared to those who ate fish <2 times/week (RR=1.54, 95% CI 1.03-2.31). Those who ate fish 2-4 times/week also had a higher RR of prostate cancer compared to those who ate fish <2 times/week, but this association was not significant (RR=1.18, 95% CI 0.83-1.67);

There were no significant associations found between broiled fish intake and risk of prostate cancer; and

Those in the highest category of total fish intake had a significantly higher RR of prostate cancer compared to those in the lowest category (RR=1.77, 95% CI 1.01-3.11). Those in the intermediate category also had a higher RR of prostate cancer compared to those in the lowest category, but this association was not significant (RR=1.19, 95% CI 0.82-1.73).

A

Categories of fish intake:

1 = < 1.0 time/week

2 = 1.0-1.4 times/week

3 = 1.5-2.4 times/week

4 = 2.5+ times/week

After adjusting for sex, country of birth, and intake of energy, fat, and cereal products:

There were no significant associations found between fish intake (defined by four categories) and the risk of colorectal cancer, colon cancer, or rectal cancers; and

There were no significant associations found between fish intake (defined as a continuous variable) and the risk of colorectal cancer (HR=0.99, 95% CI 0.91-1.08), colon cancer (HR=1.01, 95% CI 0.90-1.12), and rectal cancer (HR=0.97, 95% CI 0.84-1.12).

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Folsom and Demissie, 2004

Cohort

Women (n=41,836)

Aged 55-69 years

Iowa

Iowa Women’s Health Study

Group 1 = no heart disease or cancer at baseline

Group 2 = no cancer at baseline, but a history of myocardial infarction, angina, or other heart disease

Follow-up of 442,965 person-years

Seafood; dietary fatty acids

Augustsson et al., 2003

Cohort

Men (n=47,882)

Aged 40-75 years

US health professionals

Health Professionals Follow-up Study

No diagnosis of cancer at baseline

Follow-up of 12 years

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Categories of fish intake:

1 = <0.5 times/week

2 = 0.5-1.0 times/week

3 = 1.0-1.5 times/week

4 = >1.5-<2.5 times/week

5 = ≥2.5 times/week

Quintiles of omega-3 fatty acid intake:

1 = ≤0.05 g/day

2 = 0.06-0.10 g/day

3 = 0.11-0.16 g/day

4 = 0.17-0.26 g/day

5 = ≥0.27 g/day

After adjusting for age, energy intake, education level, physical activity, alcohol consumption, smoking status, pack-years of cigarette smoking, age at first live birth, estrogen use, vitamin use, BMI, waist/hip ratio, diabetes, hypertension, intake of whole grains, fruit and vegetables, red meat, cholesterol, and saturated fat:

Among women with no cancer or heart disease at baseline, no significant associations were found between frequency of fish intake and risk of cancer mortality or breast cancer; and

Among women with no cancer or heart disease at baseline, no significant associations were found between quintiles of omega-3 fatty acid intake and risk of total mortality or breast cancer incidence.

N

Categories of fish consumption:

1 = <2 times/month

2 = 2 times/month to 1 time/week

3 = 2-3 times/week

4 = >3 times/week

After adjusting for age, calories, fatty acids, lycopene, retinol, vitamin D, and physical activity:

Those who ate fish >3 times/week had a significantly lower RR of metastatic prostate cancer than those who ate fish <2 times/month (RR=0.56, 95% CI 0.37-0.86). No other comparisons for metastatic prostate cancer were significant;

There were no significant associations found between total fish consumption and all prostate cancer or advanced prostate cancer; and

Each additional 0.5 g/day of marine fatty acids was associated with a RR of 0.76 (95% CI 0.58-0.98) for metastatic prostate cancer.

“When fish intake was analyzed as a continuous variable, an increase in three servings of fish per week was associated with a RR of 0.75 (95% CI 0.60-0.94) for metastatic prostate cancer.”

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Holmes et al., 2003

Cohort

Women (n=88,647)

Aged 30-55 years

US nurses

Nurses’ Health Study (NHS)

No diagnosed cancer other than nonmelanoma skin cancer prior to 1980

Follow-up of 18 years

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Categories of fish intake:

1 = ≤0.13 servings/day

2 = 0.14-0.20 servings/day

3 = 0.21-0.27servings/day

4 = 0.28-0.39 servings/day

5 = ≥0.40 servings/day

After adjusting for age, 2-year time period, total energy intake, alcohol intake, parity and age at first birth, BMI at age 18, weight change since age 18, height in inches, family history of breast cancer, history of benign breast disease, age at menarche, menopausal status, age at menopause and hormone replacement therapy use, and duration of menopause:

There was no significant association found between fish intake and the risk of breast cancer for the whole cohort or when premenopausal women and postmenopausal women were analyzed separately; and

Similarly nonsignificant results were found when fish intake was defined as no intake, <1 serving/day and ≥1 serving/day.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Stripp et al., 2003

Cohort

Women (n=23,693)

Aged 50-64 years

Copenhagen and Aarhus, Denmark

Diet, Cancer and Health study

No diagnosis of cancer at baseline

Median follow-up of 4.8 years

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Lean fish = ≤8 g/100 g

Fatty fish = >8 g/100 g

Percentiles of lean fish intake:

5th percentile = 7 g/day

25th percentile = 16 g/day

75th percentile = 32 g/day

95th percentile = 56 g/day

Percentiles of fatty fish intake:

5th percentile = 2 g/day

25th percentile = 6 g/day

75th percentile = 19 g/day

95th percentile = 39 g/day

Percentiles of fried fish intake:

5th percentile = 5 g/day

25th percentile = 13 g/day

75th percentile = 30 g/day

95th percentile = 55 g/day

Percentiles of boiled fish intake:

5th percentile = 0 g/day

25th percentile = 4 g/day

75th percentile = 11 g/day

95th percentile = 23 g/day

Percentiles of processed fish intake:

5th percentile = 2 g/day

25th percentile = 6 g/day

75th percentile = 19 g/day

95th percentile = 40 g/day

After adjusting for parity, benign breast tumor, years of school, use of hormone replacement therapy, duration of HRT use, BMI, and alcohol:

Every 25 g/day increase in total fish consumption significantly increased the risk of breast cancer (IRR=1.13, 95% CI 1.03-1.23); and

The risk of breast cancer is also increased for every 25 g/day increase in fatty fish (IRR=1.11, 95% CI 0.91-1.34), lean fish (IRR=1.13, 95% CI 0.99-1.29), fried fish (IRR=1.09, 95% CI 0.95-1.25), boiled fish (IRR=1.09, 95% CI 0.85-1.42), and processed fish (IRR=1.12, 95% CI 0.93-1.34), but the IRR were not.

A

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Takezaki et al., 2003

Cohort

Men (n=2798)

Women (n=3087)

Aged 40-79 years

Aichi Prefecture, Japan

Rural area

Follow-up of 14 years

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Categories of fish and shellfish intake:

Low = <1 time/week

Middle = 1-2 times/week

High = ≥3 times/week

After adjusting for age, sex, smoking, and occupation, those in the high-fish and -shellfish intake category had a significantly lower RR for incident lung cancer than those in the low category (RR=0.32, 95% CI 0.13-0.76) (p for trend = 0.003). The middle intake group also had a smaller RR but it was not significant (RR=0.99, 95% CI 0.48-2.03).

After adjusting for age, sex, smoking, and occupation:

Those in the middle and high categories of total fish intake (regardless of preparation method) had a significantly lower RR for incident lung cancer than those in the low category (RR=0.43, 95% CI 0.20-0.95; and RR=0.23, 95% CI 0.10-0.54; respectively);

Those in the high categories of broiled and boiled fish intake had significantly lower RR for incident lung cancer than those in the low categories (RR=0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.93; and RR=0.27, 95% CI 0.09-0.81; respectively). Those in the middle categories of broiled and boiled fish intake also had lower RR for incident lung cancer than those in the low category but they were not significant; and

There were no significant associations found between raw or deep-fried fish intake and the risk of incident lung cancer.

Similar results were found when the model further adjusted for drinking, exercise habit, consumption of meat, green-yellow vegetables, and salty/dried fish.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Ngoan et al., 2002

Cohort

Men (n=5917)

Women (n=7333)

Aged >15 years

Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan

Follow-up of 139,390 person-years

Seafood

Ozasa et al., 2001

Cohort

Men (n=42,940)

Women (n=55,308)

Aged 40-79 years

19 prefectures throughout Japan

Japanese Collaborative Cohort (JACC) Study

No history of lung cancer

Average follow-up of 92 months

Seafood

Terry et al., 2001

Cohort

Men (n=6272)

Mean age of 55.6 years (baseline)

Twin pairs from the Sweden Twin registry

Sweden

Follow-up of 30 years

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Categories of cuttle fish intake:

Low = seldom or never

Medium = 2-4 times/month

High = 2-4 times or more/week

Categories of fish intake:

Low = 2-4 times or less/month

Medium = 2-4 times/week

High = 1 time or more/day

After adjusting for age, there was no significant association found between intake of fresh fish, processed fish, or cuttle fish and the risk of stomach cancer among men and women.

After adjusting for age, sex, smoking, processed meat, liver, cooking or salad oil, suimono, and pickled food, there was no significant association found between intake of fresh fish, processed fish, or cuttle fish either including the first 3 years of follow-up or excluding the first 3 years of follow-up.

N

Categories of fish intake:

1 = ≤1-2 times/week

2 = 3-4 times/week

3 = Almost every day

After adjusting for age, parents’ history of lung cancer, smoking status, smoking index and time since quitting smoking, there was no significant association found between fish intake and risk of lung cancer death in men or women.

N

Categories of fish intake:

1 = Never/seldom part of diet

2 = Small part of diet

3 = Moderate part of diet

4 = Large part of diet

After adjusting for age, BMI, physical activity, smoking, and consumption of alcohol, red meat, processed meat, fruit and vegetables, and milk:

Those who never or seldomly ate fish had a significantly higher RR of all prostate cancers than those who made fish a moderate part of their diet (RR=2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.5, p<0.05);

Those who never or seldomly ate fish had a significantly higher RR of prostate cancer deaths than those who made fish a moderate part of their diet (RR=3.3, 95% CI 1.8-6.0, p<0.01); and

No other comparisons between fish consumption and all prostate cancers or prostate cancer deaths were significant.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Key et al., 1999

Cohort

Women (n=34,759)

Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan

Life Span Study

In Hiroshima or Nagasaki during the time of the bombs and city residents during the 1950 census, or not in either city at the time of the bombs

Follow-up of 488,989 person-years

Seafood

Kato et al., 1997

Cohort

Women (n=14,727)

Aged 34-65 years

New York and Florida

New York University Women’s Health Study

No use of hormonal medication or pregnancy in preceding 6 months

Follow-up of 105,044 person-years

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Categories of fish intake:

1 = ≤ 1 time/week

2 = 2-4 times/week

3 = ≥5 times/week

4 = Unknown

After adjusting for attained age, calendar period, city, age at time of bombing, and radiation dose:

There were no significant associations found between categories of fish (not dried) intake and risk of breast cancer; and

Those in the “unknown” category of dried fish intake had a significantly lower RR of breast cancer than those in the 1st category (RR=0.77, 95% CI 0.60-0.98). No other comparisons for dried fish intake were significant.

N

Quartile of fish intake, absolute amounts not specified

After adjusting for calories intake, age, place at enrollment, and highest level of education:

Those in the 4th quartile of fish intake had a significantly lower RR of colorectal cancer compared to those in the 1st quartile (RR=0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.89). The RR for those in the 2nd and 3rd quartiles were not significant (p for trend = 0.007);

Those in the 4th quartile of fish protein intake had a significantly lower RR of colorectal cancer compared to those in the 1st quartile (RR=0.42, 95% CI 0.23-0.77). The RR for those in the 2nd and 3rd quartiles were also lower but not significant (p for trend = 0.016);

Those in the 4th quartile of fish calcium intake had a significantly lower RR of colorectal cancer compared to those in the 1st quartile (RR=0.41, 95% CI 0.22-0.74). The RR for those in the 2nd and 3rd quartiles were also lower but not significant (p for trend = 0.001); and

No significant association was found between fish fat intake and risk of colorectal cancer (p for trend = 0.056).

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Veierod et al., 1997

Cohort

Men (n=25,956)

Women (n=25,496)

Aged 16-56 years

Norway

Attended Norwegian health screening between 1977 and 1983

Average follow-up of 11.2 years (578,047 person-years)

Seafood; n-3 supplements

Chiu et al., 1996

Cohort

Women (n=35,156)

Aged 55-69 years

Iowa

Iowa Women’s Health Study

No self-reported history of cancer at baseline or prior use of chemotherapy

Follow-up of 7 years (233,261 person-years)

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Cod-liver oil intake: yes or no

Sardines, pickled herring (sandwich spread): yes or no

Categories of fish liver intake:

1 = <1 time/week in season

2 = 1-2 times/week in season

3 = ≥3 times/week in season

Categories of main meals with fish:

1 = <1 time/week

2 = 1-2 times/week

3 = 3-4 times/week

4 = ≥5 times/week

After adjusting for smoking status, gender, age at inclusion, and attained age:

Those taking cod liver oil had a lower incidence rate ratio of lung cancer compared to those not taking cod liver oil (IRR=0.5, 95% CI 0.3-1.0), but it was not significant;

Those who consumed sardines and pickled herring had a significantly higher incidence rate ratio compared to those not consuming sardines and pickled herring (IRR=1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.2);

Those who consumed fish liver ≥3 times/week in season had a significantly higher incidence rate ratio of lung cancer compared to those who consumed fish liver <1 time/week in season (IRR=2.6, 95% CI 1.2-6.0). Those who consumed fish liver 1-2 times/week in season also had a higher incidence rate ratio compared to those who consumed fish liver1 time/week in season (IRR=1.1, 95% CI 0.7-1.7), but it was not significant; and

Those who consumed main meals with fish ≥5 times/week had a significantly higher incidence rate ratio of lung cancer compared to those who ate main meals with fish <1 time/week (IRR=3.0, 95% CI 1.2-7.3). Those who consumed main meals with fish 1-2 times/week and 3-4 times/ week also had higher incidence rate ratios of lung cancer compared to those who consumed main meals with fish <1 time/week (IRR=1.1, 95% CI 0.6-2.2; and IRR=1.0, 95% CI 0.5-2.1), but they were not significant.

B

Categories of fish intake:

1 = <4 servings/month

2 = 4-6 servings/month

3 = >6 servings/month

After adjusting for age and total energy intake, there were no significant associations found between intake of all fish or polyunsaturated fat and risk of non-Hodgkins lymphoma.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Chyou et al., 1995

Cohort

Men (n=7995)

Born in 1900-1919

Examined from 1965-1968

Oahu, Hawaii

American men of Japanese ancestry

Participated in the Honolulu Heart Program

Follow-up of 24 years

Seafood

Giovannucci et al., 1994

Cohort

Men (n=47,949)

Aged 40-75 years

US health professionals

Health Professionals Follow-up Study

No diagnosed cancer at baseline

Seafood

Le Marchand et al., 1994

Cohort

Men (n=20,316)

Aged <45 years

Permanent resident of Hawaii

Nonmilitary

Japanese, Caucasian, Filipino, Hawaiian/part Hawaiian, and Chinese

No invasive cancer within 5 years before entry, no diagnosis of prostate cancer earlier than 5 years before interview

Median follow-up of 6 years (between entry and diagnosis for cases)

Seafood

Chyou et al., 1993

Cohort

Men (n=7995)

Born in 1900-1919

Examined from 1965-1968

Oahu, Hawaii

American men of Japanese ancestry

Participated in the Honolulu Heart Program

Follow-up of 22 years

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Categories of fish intake:

1 = ≤1 serving/week

2 = 2-4 servings/week

3 = ≥5 servings/week

After adjusting for age, alcohol, number of cigarettes/day and number of years smoked:

There was no significant association found between fish intake and the risk of upper aerodigestive tract cancer (RR=1.02, 95% CI 0.65-1.61 for 2-4 times/week compared to ≤1 time/week; and RR=1.37, 95% CI 0.70-2.69 for ≥5 times/week compared to ≤1 time/week).

N

Categories of fish intake (median):

1 = 8.4 g/day

2 = 20.9 g/day

3 = 31.0 g/day

4 = 47.8 g/day

5 = 83.4 g/day

After adjusting for age, there was no significant association found between fish intake and the risk of colon cancer.

N

Quantile of fish intake, absolute amounts not specified

After adjusting for age, ethnicity, and income, no significant association was found between risk of prostate cancer and quantile of fish intake at baseline.

N

Categories of fish intake:

1 = ≤1 serving/week

2 = 2-4 servings/week

3 = ≥5 servings/week

After adjusting for age and smoking, there was no significant association found between fish intake and bladder cancer (RR=0.90, 95% CI 0.59-1.39 for 2-4 times/week compared to ≤1 time/week; and RR=0.67, 95% CI 0.26-1.67 for ≥5 times/week compared to ≤1 time/week).

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Vatten et al., 1990

Cohort

Women (n=14,500)

Aged 35-51 years

Norway

Participated in the National Health Screening Service

Follow-up of 11-14 years (mean = 12 years)

Seafood

Willett et al., 1990

Cohort

Women (n=88,751)

Aged 30-55 years

US nurses

Nurses’ Health Study (NHS)

No history of cancer, inflammatory bowel disease, or familial polyposis at baseline

Follow-up of 6 years (512,488 person-years)

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Categories of overall fish intake:

1 = ≤2 times/week

2 = >2 times/week

Categories of poached fish intake:

1 = <2 times/month

2 = 2-4 times/month

3 = ≥5 times/month

After adjusting for age:

Those who ate fish >2 times/week had a higher IRR of breast cancer when compared to those who ate fish ≤2 times/week, but it was not significant (IRR=1.2, 95% CI 0.8-1.7); and

Those who ate poached fish 2-4 times/month and ≥5 times/month had lower IRR of breast cancer when compared to those who ate poached fish <2 times/week, but they were not significant (IRR=0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.1; and IRR=0.7, 95% CI 0.4-1.0; respectively).

N

Categories of fish intake:

1 = <1 time/month

2 = 1-3 times/month

3 = 1 time/week

4 = 2-4 times/week

5 = ≥5 times/week

Quintiles of chicken and fish intake:

1 = <22 g/day

2 = 22-28 g/day

3 = 29-40 g/day

4 = 41-64 g/day

5 = ≥65 g/day

After adjusting for age, there was no significant association found between fish intake and incidence of colon cancer.

After adjusting for age and total energy intake:

Those in the 4th and 5th quintiles of chicken and fish intake had significantly lower RR of colon cancer compared to those in the 1st quintile (RR=0.47, 95% CI 0.27-0.81; and RR=0.56, 95% CI 0.34-0.92; respectively); and

Those in the 2nd and 3rd quintiles of chicken and fish intake also had lower RR of colon cancer compared to those in the 1st quintile (RR=0.75, 95% CI 0.46-1.22; and RR=0.99, 95% CI 0.63-1.54; respectively), but they were not significant.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Mills et al., 1989

Cohort

Men (n=about 15,000)

Aged ≥25 years

California

Seventh-day Adventists

Follow-up of 6 years (78,000 person-years)

Seafood

Kvale et al., 1983

Cohort

Men (n=13,785)

Women (n=2928)

Men in a probability sample of the general population of Norway

A roster of male siblings, living in Norway, of migrants to the US

Male and female family members of patients interviewed in a Norwegian case-control study of gastrointestinal cancer

Follow-up of 11.5 years

Seafood

Pan et al., 2004

Case-control

Cases = with incident ovarian cancer (n=442)

Controls = without cancer from eight provinces, except Manitoba (n=2135)

Women

Mean age of 55 years

Canada

National Enhanced Cancer Surveillance Study (NECSS)

Seafood; dietary fatty acids

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Categories of fish intake:

1 = Never

2 = <1 time/week

3 = ≥1 time/week

After adjusting for age:

Those who ate fish <1 time/week had a significantly higher RR of prostate cancer compared to those who never ate fish (RR=1.68, 95% CI 1.16-2.43); and

Those who ate fish ≥1 time/week also had a higher relative risk of prostate cancer compared to those who never ate fish, but it was not significant (RR=1.47, 95% CI 0.84-2.60).

After adjusting for age; education; current use of meat, poultry or fish, beans, legumes or peas, citrus fruit, dry fruit; and index of fruit, nuts, and tomatoes:

No significant association was found between current use of fish and prostate cancer risk (RR=1.37, 95% CI 0.95-1.96 for <1 time/week compared to never and RR=1.57, 95% CI 0.88-2.78 for ≥1 time/week compared to never).

A

Index of frequency of fish intake (scores):

1 = <10

2 = 10-14

3 = 15-19

4 = ≥20

After adjusting for age, cigarette smoking, region, and urban/rural place of residence, no significant association was found between the fish intake (the highest score of fish intake compared to the lowest score of fish intake) and the risk of lung cancer, with either histologically verified primary tumor (β=−0.07±0.13, p=0.63) or squamous and small-cell carcinomas (β=−0.01±0.17, p=0.99).

N

Serving size=4 oz/week

Quartiles of fish and fatty acid intakes, absolute amount unspecified

After adjusting for 10-year age group, province of residence, education, alcohol consumption, cigarette pack-years, BMI, total caloric intake, recreational physical activity, number of live births, menstruation years, and menopause status:

There were no significant associations found between fish intake or fatty acid intake (saturated, monounsaturated, or polyunsaturated) and risk of ovarian cancer.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Goldbohm et al., 1994

Case-cohort

Men (n=1688)

Women (n=1812)

Aged 55-69 years

Netherlands

Based on incident cases of colon cancer

Subcohort of Netherlands Cohort Study

Follow-up of over 3.3 years

Seafood; dietary fatty acids

Larsson et al., 2004

Review

Case-control, cohort, and animal studies

Seafood; n-3 supplements

*N = Evidence of no association or no clear association; B = Evidence of a benefit; A = Evidence of an adverse effect.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Categories of fish intake:

1 = 0 g/day

2 = 0-10 g/day

3 = 10-20 g/day

4 = >20 g/day

Quintiles of fatty acids

After adjusting for age and energy:

Men in the 3rd category of fish intake had a significantly lower RR of colon cancer compared to men in the 1st category of fish intake (RR=0.41, 95% CI 0.21-0.83). No other significant relative risks of colon cancer were found based on fish intake for men, women, or both sexes; and

No significant associations were found between risk of colon cancer and intake of energy, fat, saturated fat, monounsaturated fat, polyunsaturated fat, or protein for among men, women, or both sexes.

B

 

“Increasing evidence from animal and in vitro studies indicates that n-3 fatty acids, especially the long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids EPA and DHA, present in fatty fish and fish oils, inhibit carcinogenesis.”

“The epidemiologic data on the association between fish consumption, as a surrogate marker for n-3 fatty acid intake, and cancer risk are, however, somewhat less consistent.”

n-3 fatty acids may modify the carcinogenic process by suppressing AA-derived eicosanoid biosynthesis; influencing transcription factor activity, gene expression, and signal transduction pathways; modulating estrogen metabolism; increasing or decreasing the production of free radicals and reactive oxygen species; and influencing insulin sensitivity and membrane fluidity.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

TABLE B-2j Studies on Aging and Other Neurological Outcomes

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Chen et al., 2003

Cohort

Men with incident Parkinson’s disease (n=191)

Women with incident Parkinson’s disease (n=168)

Data from Health Professionals Follow-up Study and Nurses’ Health Study

No Parkinson’s disease, stroke, or cancer at baseline

Follow-up of 2 years

Dietary fatty acids

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Quintiles of polyunsaturated fatty acids, fish n-3 fatty acids, EPA, and DHA; absolute amounts not specified

After adjusting for baseline age, length of follow-up, smoking, energy intake, alcohol consumption, and caffeine intake:

There were no significant associations found between quintiles of polyunsaturated fatty acids, fish n-3 fatty acids, EPA, or DHA and risk of Parkinson’s disease.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Morris et al., 2003

Cohort (nested in a randomized controlled trial)

Men and women (n=815)

Aged ≥65 years

Chicago, IL (south-side)

62% Black, 38% White, 61% female, mean education level 11.8 years

Chicago Health and Aging Project

Free of Alzheimer’s disease at baseline

follow-up of 3 years

Seafood and dietary n-3 fatty acids

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Quintiles of n-3 fatty acids (g/day):

0.37-1.05, 1.06-1.22, 1.23-1.39, 1.40-1.60, 1.61-4.10

Categories of fish intake:

Never, 1-3 times/month, 1 time/week, ≥2 times/week

After adjusting for age, period of observation, and fish consumption (1-3 times/months, 1 time/week, and ≥2 times/week):

There were no significant associations found between fish consumption and risk of incident Alzheimer’s disease;

Those in the 5th quintile of total n-3 fatty acid intake had a significantly lower RR of incident Alzheimer’s disease than those in the 1st quintile (RR=0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.7); and

Those in the 4th quintile of DHA intake had a significantly lower RR of incident Alzheimer’s disease than those in the 1st quintile (RR=0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.9).

After adjusting for age, period of observation, fish consumption (1-3 times/month, 1 time/week, and ≥2 times/week), sex, race, education, total energy intake, APOE-ε4, and race × APOE-ε4 interaction:

The higher categories of fish intake had lower RR of incident Alzheimer’s disease compared to those who never ate fish (RR=0.6, 95% CI 0.3-1.3 for 1-3 times/month; RR=0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.9 for 1 time/week; and RR=0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.9 for ≥2 times/week);

Those in the 5th quintile of total n-3 fatty acid intake had a significantly lower RR of incident Alzheimer’s disease than those in the 1st quintile (RR=0.4, 95% CI 0.1-0.9); and

Those in the 4th and 5th quintiles of DHA intake had a significantly lower RR of incident Alzheimer’s disease than those in the 1st quintile (RR=0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.8; and RR=0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.9; respectively).

There were no other significant associations found between intake of n-3 fatty acids, DHA, EPA, and LA and the risk of incident Alzheimer’s disease.

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Barberger-Gateau et al., 2002

Cohort

Men and women (n=1674)

Aged ≥68 years

Southwestern France

Personnes Agees QUID (PAQUID study)—third wave of study

Free of dementia at baseline and living at home

Follow-up of 7 years

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Categories of fish or seafood consumption:

1 = Once a day

2 = At least once a week (but not everyday)

3 = From time to time (but not weekly)

4 = Never

After adjusting for age and sex, those who ate fish or seafood at least once a week had a significantly lower risk of being diagnosed with dementia in the 7 years of follow-up (HR=0.66, 95% CI 0.47-0.93).

After adjusting for age and sex, those who ate fish or seafood at least once a week had a lower risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease in the 7 years of follow-up (HR=0.69, 95% CI 0.47-1.01), with borderline significance.

After adjusting for age, sex, and education, those who ate fish or seafood at least once a week had a lower risk of being diagnosed with dementia in the 7 years of follow-up (HR=0.73, 95% CI 0.52-10.3), but it was not significant.

There was a “significant trend between increasing consumption of fish or seafood and decreasing incidence of dementia (p for trend = 0.0091).”

B

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Kalmijn et al., 1997a

Cohort

Men and women (n=5386)

Aged >55 years

Rotterdam, Netherlands

Rotterdam Study

About 43% former smokers, about 23% current smokers

About 2% history of stroke, about 7% history of myocardial infarction

Average follow-up of 2.1 years

Dietary fatty acids

Zhang et al., 2000

Cohort

Women (n=92,422 in NHS, n=95,389 in NHS II)

Aged 30-55 years in NHS

Aged 25-42 years in NHS II

US nurses living in 11 states

Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) and Nurses’ Health Study II (NHS II)—pooled

Follow-up of 14 years in NHS and 4 years in NHS II

Seafood and dietary fatty acids

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Tertiles of total fat intake:

≤75.5 g/day, 75.5-85.5 g/ day, >85.5 g/day

Tertiles of saturated fat intake:

≤29.0 g/day, 29.0-34.0 g/ day, >34.0 g/day

Tertiles of cholesterol intake:

≤208.5 mg/day, 208.5-254.5 mg/day, >254.5 mg/day

Tertiles of LA intake:

≤9.5 g/day, 9.5-15.0 g/day, >15.0 g/day

Tertiles of fish intake:

≤3.0 g/day, 3.0-18.5 g/day, >18.5 g/day

After adjusting for age, sex, education, and total energy:

Those in the 3rd tertile of total fat intake had a significantly higher RR of total dementia than those in the 1st tertile (RR=2.4, 95% CI 1.1-5.2). Those in the 2nd tertile also had a higher RR of total dementia compared to those in the 1st tertile, but it was not significant;

Those in the 3rd tertile of fish intake had a significantly lower RR of total dementia (RR=0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.9) and Alzheimer’s disease without cerebrovascular disease (RR=0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.9) than those in the 1st tertile. Those in the 2nd tertile also had a lower RR of total dementia and Alzheimer’s disease without cerebrovascular disease compared to those in the 1st tertile, but they were not significant; and

No other significant RR were found for total dementia, Alzheimer’s disease without cerebrovascular disease, or dementia with a vascular component based on daily intake of total fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, LA and fish.

B

Categories of fish intake:

1 = <1 time/week

2 = 1-2.9 times/week

3 = 3-4.9 times/week

Quintiles of total energy, total fat, animal fat, vegetable fat, saturated fat, monounsaturated fat, n-6 polyunsaturated fat, trans-unsaturated fat, cholesterol; absolute amounts not specified

After adjusting for age, total energy, tier at birth, and pack-years of smoking:

There were no significant RR of multiple sclerosis based on one unit daily increments of oleic acid (RR=0.7, 95% CI 0.4-1.4), LA (RR=0.3, 95% CI 0.1-1.1), AA (RR=0.9, 95% CI 0.7-1.2), fish omega-3 fatty acids (RR=1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.3), EPA (RR=1.3, 95% CI 0.9-1.9), or DHA (RR=1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.5) ;

There were no significant RR of multiple sclerosis based on categories of fish and other seafood (RR=1.0, 95% CI 0.8-1.4 for category 2 compared to category 1; RR=0.9, 95% CI 0.6-1.3 for category 3 compared to category 1).

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Kalmijn et al., 1997b

Cohort

Men (n=939)

Aged 69-89 years

Zutphen, Netherlands

The Zutphen Elderly Study (continuation of the Zutphen Study)

Follow-up of 3 years

Dietary fatty acids

Ghadirian et al., 1998

Case-control

Cases = incident MS patients (n=197)

Controls = from general population (n=202)

Men and women

Mean age of 42 years for male cases

Mean age of 37.5 years for female cases

Montreal, Canada

Seafood

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Total energy, n-6 PUFA, n-3 PUFA, fish as continuous variables

Tertiles of n-3 fatty acids intake:

Low = 0.0-37.5 mg/day

Medium = 37.5-155.5 mg/day

High = 155.5-2110.5 mg/day

No significant differences in the change in daily intake of total energy, n-6 PUFA, n-3 PUFA, or fish from 1985-1990 were found between those with normal and impaired cognitive function.

Those with normal cognitive function had significantly higher mean daily intakes of energy (p=0.03), DHA (p=0.05), and fish (p=0.02); and significantly lower mean daily intakes of total fat (p=0.02), total PUFA (p=0.002), and LA (p=0.006) than those with impaired cognitive function.

The adjusted OR for prevalent cognitive impairment are OR=1.09 (95% CI 0.65-1.80) for medium n-3 fatty acid intake and OR=0.96 (95% CI 0.57-1.62) for high n-3 fatty acid intake compared to the low n-3 fatty acid intake (p for trend = 0.9). They are not significant.

The adjusted OR for cognitive decline are OR=0.85 (95% CI 0.40-1.82) for medium n-3 fatty acid intake and OR=0.78 (95% CI 0.35-1.73) for high n-3 fatty acid intake compared to the low n-3 fatty acid intake (p for trend = 0.5). They are not significant.

N

100 g increments of intake/day

After adjusting for total energy and BMI, every 100 g increase in daily fish intake decreases the risk of multiple sclerosis (OR=0.91, 95% CI 0.78-1.05). For males this statistic is 1.08 (95% CI 0.84-1.40), and for females this statistic is 0.83 (95% CI 0.69-1.00).

B (females only)

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Author

Study Type

Subjects

Exposure

Petridou et al., 1998

Case-control

Cases = with cerebral palsy (n=91)

Controls = no cerebral palsy, from same study base as the cases (series1 = closest neighbor of similar sex and age as the case; series2 = first neurological patient seen by attending physicians after a visit by the case, with a healthy sibling of similar sex and age as the case) (n=246)

Children

Aged about 4-9 years

Athens, Greece

Seafood

* N = Evidence of no association or no clear association; B = Evidence of a benefit.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Amount

Results

Conclusion*

Categories of fish/fish product intake:

1 = <1 time/week

2 = 1 time/week

3 = >1 time/week

After adjusting for age of child, sex, maternal age at delivery, maternal age at menarche, maternal chronic disease, previous spontaneous abortions, persistent vomiting during index pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, number of obstetric visits, timing of membrane rupture in relation to index delivery, use of general anaesthesia in the index delivery, mode of delivery, abnormal placenta, head circumference, evident congenital malformation, place of index delivery, use of supplementary Fe during index pregnancy, intentional physical exercise during index pregnancy, painless delivery classes, energy intake, cereals and starchy roots, sugars and syrups, pulses and nuts/seeds, vegetables, fruits, meat and meat products, milk and milk products, and oils and fats:

Each one weekly serving increase in fish and fish products during pregnancy lowered the odds of having a child with cerebral palsy (OR=0.63, 95% CI 0.37-1.08, p=0.09), but this statistic was not significant.

N

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

REFERENCES

Agren JJ, Vaisanen S, Hanninen O. 1997. Hemostatic factors and platelet aggregation after a fish-enriched diet or fish oil or docosahexaenoic acid supplementation. Prostaglandins Leukotrienes & Essential Fatty Acids 57(4–5):419–421.

Albert CM, Hennekens CH, O’Donnell CJ, Ajani UA, Carey VJ, Willett WC, Ruskin JN, Manson JE. 1998. Fish consumption and risk of sudden cardiac death. Journal of the American Medical Association 279(1):23–28.

Albert CM, Campos H, Stampfer MJ, Ridker PM, Manson JE, Willett WC, Ma J. 2002. Blood levels of long-chain n-3 fatty acids and the risk of sudden death. New England Journal of Medicine 346(15):1113–1118.

Allen NE, Sauvaget C, Roddam AW, Appleby P, Nagano J, Suzuki G, Key TJ, Koyama K. 2004. A prospective study of diet and prostate cancer in Japanese men. Cancer Causes Control 15(9):911–920.

Appleby PN, Davey GK, Key TJ. 2002. Hypertension and blood pressure among meat eaters, fish eaters, vegetarians and vegans in EPIC-Oxford. Public Health Nutrition 5(5):645–654.

Ascherio A, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci EL, Willett WC. 1995. Dietary intake of marine n-3 fatty acids, fish intake, and the risk of coronary disease among men. New England Journal of Medicine 332(15):977–982.

Augustsson K, Michaud DS, Rimm EB, Leitzmann MF, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Giovannucci E. 2003. A prospective study of intake of fish and marine fatty acids and prostate cancer. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, and Prevention 12(1):64–67.

Baer DJ, Judd JT, Clevidence BA, Tracy RP. 2004. Dietary fatty acids affect plasma markers of inflammation in healthy men fed controlled diets: A randomized crossover study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 79(6):969–973.

Bang HO, Dyerberg J, Nielsen AB. 1971. Plasma lipid and lipoprotein pattern in Greenlandic West-coast Eskimos. Lancet 1(7710):1143–1145.

Barberger-Gateau P, Letenneur L, Deschamps V, Peres K, Dartigues J-F, Renaud S. 2002. Fish, meat, and risk of dementia: A cohort study. British Medical Journal 325(7370):932–933.

Bouzan C, Cohen JT, Connor WE, Kris-Etherton PM, Gray GM, Konig A, Lawrence RS, Savitz DA, Teutsch SM. 2005. A quantitative analysis of fish consumption and stroke risk. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 29(4):347–352.

Burr ML, Fehily AM, Gilbert JF, Rogers S, Holliday RM, Sweetnam PM, Elwood PC, Deadman NM. 1989. Effects of changes in fat, fish, and fibre intakes on death and myocardial reinfarction: Diet and reinfarction trial (DART). Lancet 2(8666):757–761.

Burr ML, Ashfield-Watt PAL, Dunstan FDJ, Fehily AM, Breay P, Ashton T, Zotos PC, Haboubi NAA, Elwood PC. 2003. Lack of benefit of dietary advice to men with angina: Results of a controlled trial. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 57(2):193–200.

Burr ML, Dunstan FD, George CH. 2005. Is fish oil good or bad for heart disease? Two trials with apparently conflicting results. Journal of Membrane Biology 206(2):155–163.

Caicoya M. 2002. Fish consumption and stroke: A community case-control study in Asturias, Spain. Neuroepidemiology 21(3):107–114.

Calder PC. 2004. n-3 fatty acids and cardiovascular disease: Evidence explained and mechanisms explored. Clinical Science (London, England) 107(1):1–11.

Chen H, Zhang SM, Hernan MA, Willett WC, Ascherio A. 2003. Dietary intakes of fat and risk of Parkinson’s disease. American Journal of Epidemiology 157(11):1007–1014.

Chiu BC, Cerhan JR, Folsom AR, Sellers TA, Kushi LH, Wallace RB, Zheng W, Potter JD. 1996. Diet and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma in older women. Journal of the American Medical Association 275(17):1315–1321.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Christensen JH, Gustenhoff P, Korup E, Aaroe, J, Toft E, Moller J, Rasmussen K, Dyerberg J, Schmidt EB. 1996. Effect of fish oil on heart rate variability in survivors of myocardial infarction: A double blind randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal 312(7032):677–678.

Christensen JH, Korup E, Aaroe J, Toft E, Moller J, Rasmussen K, Dyerberg J, Schmidt EB. 1997. Fish consumption, n-3 fatty acids in cell membranes, and heart rate variability in survivors of myocardial infarction with left ventricular dysfunction. American Journal of Cardiology 79(12):1670–1673.

Christensen JH, Christensen MS, Dyerberg J, Schmidt EB. 1999. Heart rate variability and fatty acid content of blood cell membranes: A dose-response study with n-3 fatty acids. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 70(3):331–337.

Chyou PH, Nomura AM, Stemmermann GN. 1993. A prospective study of diet, smoking, and lower urinary tract cancer. Annals of Epidemiology 3(3):211–216.

Chyou PH, Nomura AM, Stemmermann GN. 1995. Diet, alcohol, smoking and cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract: A prospective study among Hawaii Japanese men. International Journal of Cancer 60(5):616–621.

Cobiac L, Clifton PM, Abbey M, Belling GB, Nestel PJ. 1991. Lipid, lipoprotein, and hemostatic effects of fish vs. fish-oil n-3 fatty acids in mildly hyperlipidemic males. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 53(5):1210–1216.

Daviglus ML, Stamler J, Orencia AJ, Dyer AR, Liu K, Greenland P, Walsh MK, Morris D, Shekelle RB. 1997. Fish consumption and the 30-year risk of fatal myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medicine 336(15):1046–1053.

Dewailley E, Blanchet C, Lemieux S, Sauve L, Gingras S, Ayotte P, Holub BJ. 2001. n-3 fatty acids and cardiovascular disease risk factors among the Inuit of Nunavik. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 74(4):464–473.

Dolecek TA. 1992. Epidemiological evidence of relationships between dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids and mortality in the multiple risk factor intervention trial. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 200(2):177–182.

Dunstan DW, Mori TA, Puddey IB, Beilin LJ, Burke V, Morton AR, Stanton KG. 1997. The independent and combined effects of aerobic exercise and dietary fish intake on serum lipids and glycemic control in NIDDM. A randomized controlled study. Diabetes Care 20(6):913–921.

Dunstan DW, Mori TA, Puddey IB, Beilin LJ, Burke V, Morton AR, Stanton KG. 1999. A randomised, controlled study of the effects of aerobic exercise and dietary fish on coagulation and fibrinolytic factors in type 2 diabetics. Thrombosis and Haemostasis 81(3):367–372.

Dunstan JA, Mori TA, Barden A. 2003. Maternal fish oil supplementation in pregnancy reduces interleukin-13 levels in cord blood of infants at high risk of atopy. Clinical and Experimental Allergy 33(4):442–448.

English DR, MacInnis RJ, Hodge AM, Hopper JL, Haydon AM, Giles GG. 2004. Red meat, chicken, and fish consumption and risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, and Prevention 13(9):1509–1514.

Eritsland J, Arnesen H, Berg K. 1995. Serum Lp(a) lipoprotein levels in patients with coronary artery disease and the influence of long-term n-3 fatty acid supplementation. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation 55(4):295–300.

Folsom AR, Demissie Z. 2004. Fish intake, marine omega-3 fatty acids, and mortality in a cohort of postmenopausal women. American Journal of Epidemiology 160(10):1005–1010.

Fraser GE, Sabate J, Beeson WL, Strahan TM. 1992. A possible protective effect of nut consumption on risk of coronary heart disease. The Adventist Health Study. Archives of Internal Medicine 152(7):1416–1424.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Frost L, Vestergaard P. 2005. n-3 fatty acids consumed from fish and risk of atrial fibrillation or flutter: The Danish Diet, Cancer, and Health Study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 81(1):50–54.

Geleijnse JM, Giltay EJ, Grobbe DE, Donders AR, Kok FJ. 2002. Blood pressure response to fish oil supplementation: Metaregression analysis of randomized trials. Journal of Hypertension 20(8):1493–1499.

Ghadirian P, Jain M, Ducic S, Shatenstein B, Morisset R. 1998. Nutritional factors in the aetiology of multiple sclerosis: A case-control study in Montreal, Canada. International Journal of Epidemiology 27(5):845–852.

Gillum RF, Mussolino ME, Madans JH. 1996. The relationship between fish consumption and stroke incidence. The NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey). Archives of Internal Medicine 156(5):537–542.

Gillum RF, Mussolino M, Madans JH. 2000. The relation between fish consumption, death from all causes, and incidence of coronary heart disease. The NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 53(3):237–244.

Giovannucci E, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Ascherio A, Willett WC. 1994. Intake of fat, meat, and fiber in relation to risk of colon cancer in men. Cancer Research 54(9):2390–2397.

GISSI Study Investigators. 1999. Dietary supplementation with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and vitamin E after myocardial infarction: Results of the GISSI-Prevenzione trial. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell’Infarto miocardico. Lancet 354(9177):447–455.

Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA, van ‘t Veer P, Brants HA, Dorant E, Sturmans F, Hermus RJ. 1994. A prospective cohort study on the relation between meat consumption and the risk of colon cancer. Cancer Research 54(3):718–723.

Gramenzi A, Gentile A, Fasoli M, Negri E, Parazzini F, La Vecchia C. 1990. Association between certain foods and risk of acute myocardial infarction in women. British Medical Journal 300(6727):771–773.

Grundt H, Nilsen DW, Hetland O, Aarsland T, Baksaas I, Grande T, Woie L. 1995. Improvement of serum lipids and blood pressure during intervention with n-3 fatty acids was not associated with changes in insulin levels in subjects with combined hyperlipidaemia. Journal of Internal Medicine 237(3):249–259.

Hanninen OO, Agren JJ, Laitinen MV, Jaaskelainen IO, Penttila IM. 1989. Dose-response relationships in blood lipids during moderate freshwater fish diet. Annals of Medicine 21(3):203–207.

Harper CR, Jacobson TA. 2005. Usefulness of omega-3 fatty acids and the prevention of coronary heart disease. American Journal of Cardiology 96(11):1521–1929.

He K, Rimm EB, Merchant A, Rosner BA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, Ascherio A. 2002. Fish consumption and risk of stroke in men. Journal of the American Medical Association 288(24):3130–3136.

He K, Song Y, Daviglus ML, Liu K, Van Horn L, Dyer AR, Goldbourt U, Greenland P. 2004a. Fish consumption and incidence of stroke: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Stroke 35(7):1538–1542.

He K, Song Y, Daviglus ML, Liu K, Van Horn L, Dyer AR, Greenland P. 2004b. Accumulated evidence on fish consumption and coronary heart disease mortality: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Circulation 109(22):2705–2711.

Holmes MD, Colditz GA, Hunter DJ, Hankinson SE, Rosner B, Speizer FE, Willett WC. 2003. Meat, fish and egg intake and risk of breast cancer. International Journal of Cancer 104(2):221–227.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Hooper L, Thompson RL, Harrison RA, Summerbell CD, Moore H, Worthington HV, Durrington PN, Ness AR, Capps NE, Davey Smith G, Riemersma RA, Ebrahim SB. 2005. Omega 3 fatty acids for prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (4):CD003177.

Hooper L, Thompson RL, Harrison RA, Summerbell CD, Ness AR, Moore HJ, Worthington HV, Durrington PN, Higgins JPT, Capps NE, Riemersma RA, Ebrahim SBJ, Davey-Smith G. 2006. Risks and benefits of omega 3 fats for mortality, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: Systematic review. British Medical Journal 332(7544):752–760.

Hu FB, Bronner L, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Rexrode KM, Albert CM, Hunter D, Manson JE. 2002. Fish and omega-3 fatty acid intake and risk of coronary heart disease in women. Journal of the Amercian Medical Association 287(14):1815–1821.

Huang SL, Lin KC, Pan WH. 2001. Dietary factors associated with physician-diagnosed asthma and allergic rhinitis in teenagers: Analyses of the first Nutrition and Health Survey in Taiwan. Clinical Exposures and Allergy 31(2):259–264.

Iso H, Rexrode KM, Stampfer MJ, Manson JE, Colditz GA, Speizer FE, Hennekens CH, Willett WC. 2001. Intake of fish and omega-3 fatty acids and risk of stroke in women. Journal of the American Medical Association 285(3):304–312.

Iso H, Kobayashi M, Ishihara J, Sasaki S, Okada K, Kita Y, Kokubo Y, Tsugane S. 2006. Intake of fish and n3 fatty acids and risk of coronary heart disease among Japanese: The Japan Public Health Center-Based (JPHC) Study Cohort I. Circulation 113(2):195–202.

Jamrozik K, Broadhurst RJ, Anderson CS, Stewart-Wynne EG. 1994. The role of lifestyle factors in the etiology of stroke. A population-based case-control study in Perth, Western Australia. Stroke 25(1):51–59.

Kalmijn S, Feskens EJ, Launer LJ, Kromhout D. 1997a. Polyunsaturated fatty acids, antioxidants, and cognitive function in very old men. American Journal of Epidemiology 145(1):33–41.

Kalmijn S, Launer LJ, Ott A, Witteman JC, Hofman A, Breteler MM. 1997b. Dietary fat intake and the risk of incident dementia in the Rotterdam Study. Annals of Neurology 42(5):776–782.

Kato I, Akhmedkhanov A, Koenig K, Toniolo PG, Shore RE, Riboli E. 1997. Prospective study of diet and female colorectal cancer: The New York University Women’s Health Study. Nutrition and Cancer 28(3):276–281.

Keli SO, Feskens EJM, Kromhout D. 1994. Fish consumption and risk of stroke: The Zutphen study. Stroke 25(2):328–332.

Kesavulu MM, Kameswararao B, Apparao CH, Kumar EG, Harinarayan CV. 2002. Effect of omega-3 fatty acids on lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzyme status in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes and Metabolism 28(1):20–26.

Key TJ, Sharp GB, Appleby PN, Beral V, Goodman MT, Soda M, Mabuchi K. 1999. Soya foods and breast cancer risk: A prospective study in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. British Journal of Cancer 81(7):1248–1256.

Konig A, Bouzan C, Cohen JT, Connor WE, Kris-Etherton PM, Gray GM, Lawrence RS, Savitz DA, Teutsch SM. 2005. A quantitative analysis of fish consumption and coronary heart disease mortality. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 29(4):335–346.

Kromann N, Green A. 1980. Epidemiological studies in the Upernavik district, Greenland. Incidence of some chronic diseases 1950–1974. Acta Medica Scandinavica 208(5):401–406.

Kromhout D, Bosschieter EB, de Lezenne Coulander C. 1985. The inverse relation between fish consumption and 20-year mortality from coronary heart disease. New England Journal of Medicine 312(19):1205–1209.

Kromhout D, Feskens EJ, Bowles CH. 1995. The protective effect of a small amount of fish on coronary heart disease mortality in an elderly population. International Journal of Epidemiology 24(2):340–345.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Kvale G, Bjelke E, Gart JJ. 1983. Dietary habits and lung cancer risk. International Journal of Cancer 31(4):397–405.

Larsson SC, Kumlin M, Ingelman-Sundberg M, Wolk A. 2004. Dietary long-chain n-3 fatty acids for the prevention of cancer: A review of potential mechanisms. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 79(6):935–945.

Le Marchand L, Kolonel LN, Wilkens LR, Myers BC, Hirohata T. 1994. Animal fat consumption and prostate cancer: A prospective study in Hawaii. Epidemiology 5(3):276–282.

Leaf A, Kang JX, Xiao Y-F, Billman GE. 2003. Clinical prevention of sudden cardiac death by n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and mechanism of prevention of arrhythmias by n-3 fish oils. Circulation 107(21):2646–2652.

Leaf A, Albert CM, Josephson M, Steinhaus, Kluger J, Kang JX, Cox B, Zhang H, Schoenfeld D. 2005. Prevention of fatal arrhythmias in high-risk subjects by fish oil n-3 fatty acid intake. Circulation 112(18):2762–2768.

Leng GC, Lee AJ, Fowkes FG, Jepson RG, Lowe GD, Skinner ER, Mowat BF. 1998. Randomized controlled trial of gamma-linolenic acid and eicosapentaenoic acid in peripheral arterial disease. Clinical Nutrition 17(6):265–271.

Lou J, Tizkalla SW, Vidal H. 1998. Moderate intake of n-3 fatty acids for 2 months has no detrimental effect on glucose metabolism and could ameliorate the lipid profile in type 2 diabetic men: Results of a controlled study. Diabetes Care 21(5):717–724.

MacLean CH, Newberry SJ, Mojica WA, Khanna P, Issa AM, Suttorp MJ, Lim YW, Traina SB, Hilton L, Garland R, Morton SC. 2006. Effects of omega-3 fatty acids on cancer risk: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association 295(4):403–415.

Madsen T, Skou HA, Hansen VE, Fog L, Christensen JH, Toft E, Schmidt EB. 2001. C-reactive protein, dietary n-3 fatty acids, and the extent of coronary artery disease. American Journal of Cardiology 88(10):1139–1142.

Mann JI, Appleby PN, Key TJ, Thorogood M. 1997. Dietary determinants of ischaemic heart disease in health conscious individuals. Heart 78(5):450–455.

Marchioli R, Barzi F, Bomba E, Chieffo C, Di Gregorio D, Di Mascio R, Franzosi MG, Geraci E, Levantesi G, Maggioni AP, Mantini L, Marfisi RM, Mastrogiuseppe G, Mininni N, Nicolosi GL, Santini M, Schweiger C, Tavazzi L, Tognoni G, Tucci C, Valagussa F. 2002. Early protection against sudden death by n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids after myocardial infarction: Time-course analysis of the results of the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell’Infarto Miocardico (GISSI)-Prevenzione. Circulation 105(16):1897–1903.

Marckmann P, Gronbaek M. 1999. Fish consumption and coronary heart disease mortality. A systematic review of prospective cohort studies. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 53(8):585–590.

Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Fernandez-Jarne E, Serrano-Martinez M, Marti A, Martinez JA, Martin-Moreno JM. 2002. Mediterranean diet and reduction in the risk of a first acute myocardial infarction: An operational healthy dietary score. European Journal of Nutrition 41(4):153–160.

Mills PK, Beeson WL, Phillips RL, Fraser GE. 1989. Cohort study of diet, lifestyle, and prostate cancer in Adventist men. Cancer 64(3):598–604.

Mori TA, Vandongen R, Beilin LJ, Burke V, Morris J, Ritchie J. 1994. Effects of varying dietary fat, fish and fish oils on blood lipids in a randomized controlled trial in men at risk of heart disease. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 59(5):1060–1068.

Mori TA, Bao DQ, Burke V. 1999. Dietary fish as a major component of a weight-loss diet: Effect on serum lipids, glucose, and insulin metabolism in overweight hypertensive subjects. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 70(5):817–825.

Morris MC, Manson JE, Rosner B, Buring JE, Willett WC, Hennekens CH. 1995. Fish consumption and cardiovascular disease in the physicians’ health study: A prospective study. American Journal of Epidemiology 142(2):166–175.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Morris MC, Evans DA, Bienias JL, Tangney CC, Bennett DA, Wilson RS, Aggarwal N, Schneider J. 2003. Consumption of fish and n-3 fatty acids and risk of incident Alzheimer disease. Archives of Neurology 60(7):940–946.

Mozaffarian D, Lemaitre RN, Kuller LH, Burke GL, Tracy RP, Siscovick DS, Cardiovascular Health Study team. 2003. Cardiac benefits of fish consumption may depend on the type of fish meal consumed: The Cardiovascular Health Study. Circulation 107(10):1372–1377.

Mozaffarian D, Psaty BM, Rimm EB, Lemaitre RN, Burke GL, Lyles MF, Lefkowitz D, Siscovick DS. 2004. Fish intake and risk of incident atrial fibrillation. Circulation 110(4):368–373.

Mozaffarian D, Longstreth WT Jr, Lemaitre RN, Manolio TA, Kuller LH, Burke GL, Siscovick DS. 2005. Fish consumption and stroke risk in elderly individuals: The cardiovascular health study. Archives of Internal Medicine 165(2):200–206. Erratum in: Archives of Internal Medicine 165(6):683.

Nagata C, Takatsuka N, Shimizu H. 2002. Soy and fish oil intake and mortality in a Japanese community. American Journal of Epidemiology 156(9):824–831.

Ness AR, Whitley E, Burr ML, Elwood PC, Smith GD, Ebrahim S. 1999. The long-term effect of advice to eat more fish on blood pressure in men with coronary disease: Results from the Diet and Reinfarction Trial. Journal of Human Hypertension 13(11):729–733.

Ness AR, Hughes J, Elwood PC, Whitley E, Smith GD, Burr ML. 2002. The long-term effect of dietary advice in men with coronary disease: Follow-up of the Diet and Reinfarction trial (DART). European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 56(6):512–518.

Ngoan LT, Mizoue T, Fujino Y, Tokui N, Yoshimura T. 2002. Dietary factors and stomach cancer mortality. British Journal of Cancer 87(1):37–42.

Nilsen DW, Albrektsen G, Landmark K, Moen S, Aarsland T, Woie L. 2001. Effects of a high-dose concentrate of n-3 fatty acids or corn oil introduced early after an acute myocardial infarction on serum triacylglycerol and HDL cholesterol. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 74(1):50–56.

Norat T, Bingham S, Ferrari P, Slimani N, Jenab M, Mazuir M, Overvad K, Olsen A, Tjonneland A, Clavel F, Boutron-Ruault MC, Kesse E, Boeing H, Bergmann MM, Nieters A, Linseisen J, Trichopoulou A, Trichopoulos D, Tountas Y, Berrino F, Palli D, Panico S, Tumino R, Vineis P, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Peeters PH, Engeset D, Lund E, Skeie G, Ardanaz E, Gonzalez C, Navarro C, Quiros JR, Sanchez MJ, Berglund G, Mattisson I, Hallmans G, Palmqvist R, Day NE, Khaw KT, Key TJ, San Joaquin M, Hemon B, Saracci R, Kaaks R, Riboli E. 2005. Meat, fish, and colorectal cancer risk: The European Prospective Investigation into cancer and nutrition. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 97(12):906–916.

Oomen CM, Feskens EJ, Rasanen L, Fidanza F, Nissinen AM, Menotti A, Kok FJ, Kromhout D. 2000. Fish consumption and coronary heart disease mortality in Finland, Italy, and The Netherlands. American Journal of Epidemiology 151(10):999–1006.

Orencia AJ, Daviglus ML, Dyer AR, Shekelle RB, Stamler J. 1996. Fish consumption and stroke in men. 30-year findings of the Chicago Western Electric Study. Stroke 27(2):204–209.

Osler M, Andreasen AH, Hoidrup S. 2003. No inverse association between fish consumption and risk of death from all-causes, and incidence of coronary heart disease in middle-aged, Danish adults. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 56(3):274–279.

Ozasa K, Watanabe Y, Ito Y, Suzuki K, Tamakoshi A, Seki N, Nishino Y, Kondo T, Wakai K, Ando M, Ohno Y. 2001. Dietary habits and risk of lung cancer death in a large-scale cohort study (JACC Study) in Japan by sex and smoking habit. Japanese Journal of Cancer Research 92(12):1259–1269.

Pan SY, Ugnat AM, Mao Y, Wen SW, Johnson KC. 2004. A case-control study of diet and the risk of ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers, & Prevention 13(9):1521–1527.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Petridou E, Koussouri M, Toupadaki N, Youroukos S, Papavassiliou A, Pantelakis S, Olsen J, Trichopoulos D. 1998. Diet during pregnancy and the risk of cerebral palsy. British Journal of Nutrition 79(5):407–412.

Raitt MH, Connor WE, Morris C, Kron J, Halperin B, Chugh SS, McClelland J, Cook J, MacMurdy K, Swenson R, Connor SL, Gerhard G, Kraemer DF, Oseran D, Marchant C, Calhoun D, Shnider R, McAnulty J. 2005. Fish oil supplementation and risk of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation in patients with implantable defibrillators: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 293(23):2884–2891.

Rodriguez BL, Sharp DS, Abbott RD, Burchfiel CM, Masaki K, Chyou PH, Huang B, Yano K, Curb JD. 1996. Fish intake may limit the increase in risk of coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality among heavy smokers. The Honolulu Heart Program. Circulation 94(5):952–956.

Sacks FM, Stone PH, Gibson CM, Silverman DI, Rosner B, Pasternak RC. 1995. Controlled trial of fish oil for regression of human coronary atherosclerosis. HARP Research Group. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 25(7):1492–1498.

Salonen JT, Seppanen K, Nyyssonen K, Korpela H, Kauhanen J, Kantola M, Tuomilehto J, Esterbauer H, Tatzber F, Salonen R. 1995. Intake of mercury from fish, lipid peroxidation, and the risk of myocardial infarction and coronary, cardiovascular, and any death in eastern Finnish men. Circulation 91(3):645–655.

Sasazuki S. 2001. Case-control study of nonfatal myocardial infarction in relation to selected foods in Japanese men and women. Japanese Circulation Journal 65(3):200–206.

Sauvaget C, Nagano J, Allen N, Grant EJ, Beral V. 2003. Intake of animal products and stroke mortality in the Hiroshima/Nagasaki Life Span Study. International Journal of Epidemiology 32(4):536–543.

Schaefer EJ, Lichtenstein AH, Lamon-Fava S. 1996. Effects of National Cholesterol Education Program Step 2 diets relatively high or relatively low in fish derived fatty acids on plasma lipoproteins in middle aged and elderly subjects. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 63(2):234–241.

Singh RB, Niaz MA, Sharma JP, Kumar R, Rastogi V, Moshiri M. 1997. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of fish oil and mustard oil in patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction: The Indian experiment of infarct survival—4. Cardiovascular Drugs Therapy 11(3):485–491.

Sirtori CR, Crepaldi G, Manzato E, Mancini M, Rivellese A, Paoletti R, Pazzucconi F, Pamparana F, Stragliotto E. 1998. One-year treatment with ethyl esters of n-3 fatty acids in patients with hypertriglyceridemia and glucose tolerance: Reduced triglyceride, total cholesterol and increased HDL-C without glycemic alterations. Atherosclerosis 137(2):419–427.

Siscovick DS, Raghunathan TE, King I, Weinmann S, Wicklund KG, Albright J, Bovbjerg V, Arbogast P, Smith H, Kushi LH, Cobb LA, Copass MK, Psaty BM, Lemaitre R, Retzlaff B, Childs M, Knopp RH. 1995. Dietary intake and cell membrane levels of long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and the risk of primary cardiac arrest. Journal of the American Medical Association 274(17):1363–1367.

Skerrett PJ, Hennekens CH. 2003. Consumption of fish and fish oils and decreased risk of stroke. Preventive Cardiology 6(1):38–41.

Stolzenberg-Solomon RZ, Pietinen P, Taylor PR, Virtamo J, Albanes D. 2002. Prospective study of diet and pancreatic cancer in male smokers. American Journal of Epidemiology 155(9):783–792.

Stripp C, Overvad K, Christensen J, Thomsen BL, Olsen A, Moller S, Tjonneland A. 2003. Fish intake is positively associated with breast cancer incidence rate. Journal of Nutrition 133(11):3664–3669.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Takezaki T, Inoue M, Kataoka H, Ikeda S, Yoshida M, Ohashi Y, Tajima K, Tominaga S. 2003. Diet and lung cancer risk from a 14-year population-based prospective study in Japan: With special reference to fish consumption. Nutrition and Cancer 45(2):160–167.

Tavani A, Pelucchi C, Negri E, Bertuzzi M, La Vecchia C. 2001. n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, fish, and nonfatal acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 104(19):2269–2272.

Terry P, Lichtenstein P, Feychting M, Ahlbom A, Wolk A. 2001. Fatty fish consumption and risk of prostate cancer. Lancet 357(9270):1764–1766.

Terry PD, Rohan TE, Wolk A. 2003. Intakes of fish and marine fatty acids and the risks of cancers of the breast and prostate and of other hormone-related cancers: A review of the epidemiologic evidence. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 77(3):532–543.

Troisi RJ, Willett WC, Weiss ST. 1995. A prospective study of diet and adult-onset asthma. American Journal of Respiratory Critical Care 151(5):1401–1408.

Vandongen R, Mori TA, Burke V, Beilin LJ, Morris J, Ritchie J. 1993. Effects on blood pressure of omega 3 fats in subjects at increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Hypertension 22(3):371–379.

Vatten LJ, Solvoll K, Loken EB. 1990. Frequency of meat and fish intake and risk of breast cancer in a prospective study of 14,500 Norwegian women. International Journal of Cancer 46(1):12–15.

Veierod MB, Laake P, Thelle DS. 1997. Dietary fat intake and risk of lung cancer: A prospective study of 51,452 Norwegian men and women. European Journal of Cancer Prevention 6(6):540–549.

Vericel E, Calzada C, Chapuy P, Lagarde M. 1999. The influence of low intake of n-3 fatty acids on platelets in elderly people. Atherosclerosis 147(1):187–192.

Whelton SP, He J, Whelton PK, Muntner P. 2004. Meta-analysis of observational studies on fish intake and coronary heart disease. American Journal of Cardiology 93(9):1119–1123.

Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Rosner BA, Speizer FE. 1990. Relation of meat, fat, and fiber intake to the risk of colon cancer in a prospective study among women. New England Journal of Medicine 323(24):1664–1672.

Yuan JM, Ross RK, Gao YT, Yu MC. 2001. Fish and shellfish consumption in relation to death from myocardial infarction among men in Shanghai, China. American Journal of Epidemiology 154(9):809–816.

Zhang J, Sasaki S, Amano K, Kesteloot H. 1999. Fish consumption and mortality from all causes, ischemic heart disease, and stroke: An ecological study. Preventive Medicine 28(5):520–529.

Zhang SM, Willett WC, Hernan MA, Olek MJ, Ascherio A. 2000. Dietary fat in relation to risk of multiple sclerosis among two large cohorts of women. American Journal of Epidemiology 152(11):1056–1064.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Recommendations for Seafood and EPA/DHAConsumption

TABLE B-3 Recommendations for Seafood and EPA/DHA Consumption

Organization

Audience

Purpose of Recommendtion

American Heart Association

Healthy adults (without documented coronary heart disease)

Reduce cardiovascular disease by dietary and lifestyle facts among the general population

American Heart Association

People with documented heart disease

Secondary prevention

American Heart Association

People with elevated triglycerides

Lower triglycerides

Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee

Unspecified

Provide sound and current dietary guidelines to consumers

MyPyramid

Americans

Help Americans make healthy food choices, given their sex, age, and activity level

National Cholesterol Education Program, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

People with high LDL-cholesterol/those adopting therapeutic lifestyle changes (TLC)

Healthy lifestyle recommendation for a healthy heart

American Diabetes Association

Unspecified

Lower risk of diabetes, and protect your heart and blood vessels

World Health Organization

Unspecified

To protect against coronary heart disease and ischaemic stroke

European Society of Cardiology

General population

To offer advice on food choices to compose a diet associated with the lowest risk of cardiovascular disease

United Kingdom Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition

General population and pregnant women

To reduce risk of cardiovascular disease

European Food Safety Authority

Unspecified

Reach daily intake for LC n-3 PUFA recommended for potential benefits to health

National Heart Foundation of Australia

People with coronary heart disease

Preventing cardiovascular events

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Recommendations

Type of Fish/Seafood

Serving size

# of Servings

All fish, particularly fatty fish (salmon, albacore tuna, mackerel, lake trout, herring, and sardines)

3 ounces cooked (or 4 ounces raw)

Two per week

EPA+DHA per day, preferably from fatty fish; supplements can be considered with physician consultation

1 gram EPA+DHA

One per day

EPA+DHA per day as a capsule with physician consultation

2-4 grams EPA+DHA

One per day

Fish, especially salmon, trout, white (albacore or bluefin) tuna, mackerel, or other fish that are high in EPA and DHA

4 ounces

Two per week

Fish rich in omega-3 fatty acids, such as salmon, trout, and herring

Not specified

More often

Fish, type unspecified

≤5 ounces

One per day

Fish

Not specified

2–3 per week

Fish, type unspecified

Equivalent to 200–500 mg of EPA+DHA

1–2 per week

Fish, particularly oily fish

Not specified

Consumption encouraged

Fish

Not specified

Two per week, one of which should be oil fish (≈450 mg/ day of LCPUFA)

Fish, especially fatty fish

130 grams

1–2 per week

Fish, preferably oily fish

Unspecified

At least 2 per week

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

FDA and EPA Safety Levels in Regulations and Guidance

TABLE B-4 FDA and US EPA Safety Levels in Regulations and Guidance

Product

Level

Reference

Ready-to-eat fishery products (minimal cooking by consumer)

Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC)—1 × 103 ETEC/gram, LT or ST positive.

Compliance Program 7303.842

Ready-to-eat fishery products (minimal cooking by consumer)

Listeria monocytogenes—presence of organism.

Compliance Program 7303.842

All fish

Salmonella species—presence of organism.

Sec 555.300 Compliance Policy Guide

All fish

  1. Staphylococcus aureus—positive for staphylococcal enterotoxin, or

  2. Staphylococcus aureus level is equal to or greater than 104/gram (MPN).

Compliance Program 7303.842

Ready-to-eat fishery products (minimal cooking by consumer)

Vibrio cholerae—presence of toxigenic 01 or non-01.

Compliance Program 7303.842

Ready-to-eat fishery products (minimal cooking by consumer)

Vibrio parahaemolyticus—levels equal to or greater than 1 × 104/gram (Kanagawa positive or negative).

Compliance Program 7303.842

Ready-to-eat fishery products (minimal cooking by consumer)

Vibrio vulnificus—presence of pathogenic organism.

Compliance Program 7303.842

All fish

Clostridium botulinum

  1. Presence of viable spores or vegetative cells in products that will support their growth, or

  2. Presence of toxin.

Compliance Program 7303.842

Clams and oysters, fresh or frozen—imports

Microbiological—

  1. E. coli—MPN of 230/100 grams (average of subs or 3 or more of 5 subs);

  2. APC—500,000/gram (average of subs or 3 or more of 5 subs).

Sec 560.600 Compliance Policy Guide

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Product

Level

Reference

Clams, oysters, and mussels, fresh or frozen—domestic

Microbiological—

  1. E. coli or fecal coliform—1 or more of 5 subs exceeding MPN of 330/100 grams or 2 or more exceeding 230/100 grams;

  2. APC—1 or more of 5 subs exceeding 1,500,000/gram or 2 or more exceeding 500,000/gram.

Compliance Program 7303.842

Salt-cured, air-dried uneviscerated fish

Not permitted in commerce (Note: small fish exemption).

Sec 540.650 Compliance Policy Guide

Tuna, mahi mahi, and related fish

Histamine—500 ppm based on toxicity. 50 ppm defect action level, because histamine is generally not uniformly distributed in a decomposed fish. Therefore, 50 ppm is found in one section, there is the possibility that other units may exceed 500 ppm.

Sec 540.525 Compliance Policy Guide

All fish

Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)—2 ppm (edible portion).a

21 CFR 109.30

Fin fish and shellfish

Aldrin and dieldrin—0.3 ppm (edible portion).

Sec 575.100 Compliance Policy Guide

Frog legs

Benzene hexachloride—0.3 ppm (edible portion).

Sec 575.100 Compliance Policy Guide

All fish

Chlordane—0.3 ppm (edible portion).

Sec 575.100 Compliance Policy Guide

All fish

Chlordecone—0.4 ppm crabmeat and 0.3 ppm in other fish (edible portion).

Sec 575.100 Compliance Policy Guide

All fish

DDT, TDE, and DDE—5 ppm (edible portion).

Sec 575.100 Compliance Policy Guide

All fish

Heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide—0.3 ppm (edible portion).

Sec 575.100 Compliance Policy Guide

All fish

Mirex—0.1 ppm (edible portion).

Sec 575.100 Compliance Policy Guide

All fish

Diquat—0.1 ppm.a

40 CFR 180.226

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×

Product

Level

Reference

Fin fish and crayfish

Fluridone—0.5 ppm.a

40 CFR 180.420

Fin fish

Glyphosate—0.25 ppm.a

40 CFR 180.364

Shellfish

Glyphosate—3 ppm.a

40 CFR 180.364

Fin fish

Simazine—12 ppm.a

40 CFR 180.213a

All fish

2,4-D—1 ppm.a

40 CFR 180.142

Salmonids, catfish, and lobster

Oxytetracycline—2 ppm.

21 CFR 556.500

All fish

Sulfamerazine—no residue permitted.

21 CFR 556.660

Salmonids and catfish

Sulfadimethoxine/ormetoprim combination—0.1 ppm.

21 CFR 556.640

All fish

Unsanctioned drugsb—no residue permitted.

Sec 615.200 Compliance Policy Guide

Crustacea

Toxic elements: 76 ppm arsenic; 3 ppm cadmium; 12 ppm chromium; 1.5 ppm lead; 70 ppm nickel.

FDA Guidance Documents

Clams, oysters, and mussels

Toxic elements: 86 ppm arsenic; 4 ppm cadmium; 13 ppm chromium; 1.7 ppm lead; 80 ppm nickel.

FDA Guidance Documents

All fish

Methyl mercury—1 ppm.c

Sec 540.600 Compliance Policy Guide

All fish

Paralytic shellfish poison—0.8 ppm (80 µg/100 g) saxitoxin equivalent.

Sec 540.250 Compliance Policy Guide, and Compliance Program 7303.842

Clams, mussels and oysters, fresh, frozen or canned

Neurotoxic shellfish poison—0.8 ppm (20 mouse units/100 grams) brevetoxin-2 equivalent.

National Shellfish Sanitation Program Manual of Operations

All fish

Amnesic shellfish poison—20 ppm domoic acid, except in the viscera of dungeness crab, where 30 ppm is permitted.

Compliance Program 7303.842

All fish

Hard or sharp foreign object—generally 0.3 (7 mm) to 1.0 (25 mm) in length.

Sec 555.425 Compliance Policy Guide

aThese values are tolerances;

bSanctioned drugs are approved drugs and drugs used under an INAD;

cThe term “fish” refers to fresh or saltwater fin fish, crustaceans, other forms of aquatic animal life other than birds or mammals, and all mollusks, as defined in 21 CFR 123.3(d) (FDA, 2005c).

SOURCE: CFSAN, 2001.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 297
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 298
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 299
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 300
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 301
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 302
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 303
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 304
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 305
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 306
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 307
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 308
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 309
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 310
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 311
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 312
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 313
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 314
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 315
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 316
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 317
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 318
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 319
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 320
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 321
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 322
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 323
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 324
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 325
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 326
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 327
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 328
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 329
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 330
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 331
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 332
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 333
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 334
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 335
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 336
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 337
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 338
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 339
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 340
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 341
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 342
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 343
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 344
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 345
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 346
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 347
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 348
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 349
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 350
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 351
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 352
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 353
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 354
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 355
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 356
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 357
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 358
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 359
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 360
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 361
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 362
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 363
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 364
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 365
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 366
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 367
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 368
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 369
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 370
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 371
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 372
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 373
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 374
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 375
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 376
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 377
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 378
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 379
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 380
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 381
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 382
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 383
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 384
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 385
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 386
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 387
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 388
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 389
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 390
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 391
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 392
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 393
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 394
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 395
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 396
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 397
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 398
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 399
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 400
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 401
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 402
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 403
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 404
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 405
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 406
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 407
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 408
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 409
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 410
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 411
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 412
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 413
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 414
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 415
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 416
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 417
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 418
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 419
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 420
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 421
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 422
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 423
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 424
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 425
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 426
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 427
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 428
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 429
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 430
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 431
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 432
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 433
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 434
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 435
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 436
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 437
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 438
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 439
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 440
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 441
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 442
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 443
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 444
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 445
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 446
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 447
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 448
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 449
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 450
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 451
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 452
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 453
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 454
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 455
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 456
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 457
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 458
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 459
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 460
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 461
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 462
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 463
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 464
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 465
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 466
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 467
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 468
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 469
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 470
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 471
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 472
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 473
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 474
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 475
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 476
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 477
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 478
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 479
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 480
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 481
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 482
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 483
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 484
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 485
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 486
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 487
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 488
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 489
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 490
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 491
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 492
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 493
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 494
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 495
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 496
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 497
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 498
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 499
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 500
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 501
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 502
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 503
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 504
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 505
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 506
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 507
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 508
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 509
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 510
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 511
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 512
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 513
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 514
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 515
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 516
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 517
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 518
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 519
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 520
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 521
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 522
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 523
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 524
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 525
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 526
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 527
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 528
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 529
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 530
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 531
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 532
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 533
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 534
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 535
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 536
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 537
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 538
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 539
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 540
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 541
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 542
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 543
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 544
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 545
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 546
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 547
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 548
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 549
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 550
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 551
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 552
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 553
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 554
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 555
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 556
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 557
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 558
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 559
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 560
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 561
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 562
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 563
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 564
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 565
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 566
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 567
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 568
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 569
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 570
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 571
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 572
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 573
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 574
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 575
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 576
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 577
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 578
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 579
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 580
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 581
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 582
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 583
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 584
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 585
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 586
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 587
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 588
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 589
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 590
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 591
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 592
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 593
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 594
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 595
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 596
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 597
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 598
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 599
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 600
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 601
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 602
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 603
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 604
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 605
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 606
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 607
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 608
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 609
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 610
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 611
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 612
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 613
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 614
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 615
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 616
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 617
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 618
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 619
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 620
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 621
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 622
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 623
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 624
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 625
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 626
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 627
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 628
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 629
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 630
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 631
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 632
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 633
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 634
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 635
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 636
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 637
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 638
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 639
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 640
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 641
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 642
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 643
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 644
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 645
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 646
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 647
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 648
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 649
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 650
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 651
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 652
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 653
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 654
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 655
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 656
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 657
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 658
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 659
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 660
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 661
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 662
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 663
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 664
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 665
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 666
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 667
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 668
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 669
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 670
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 671
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 672
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 673
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 674
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 675
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 676
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 677
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 678
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 679
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 680
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 681
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B Data Tables." Institute of Medicine. 2007. Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11762.
×
Page 682
Next: Appendix C Tables and Scenarios »
Seafood Choices: Balancing Benefits and Risks Get This Book
×
Buy Hardback | $95.00 Buy Ebook | $74.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The fragmented information that consumers receive about the nutritional value and health risks associated with fish and shellfish can result in confusion or misperceptions about these food sources. Consumers are therefore confronted with a dilemma: they are told that seafood is good for them and should be consumed in large amounts, while at the same time the federal government and most states have issued advisories urging caution in the consumption of certain species or seafood from specific waters.

Seafood Choices carefully explores the decision-making process for selecting seafood by assessing the evidence on availability of specific nutrients (compared to other food sources) to obtain the greatest nutritional benefits. The book prioritizes the potential for adverse health effects from both naturally occurring and introduced toxicants in seafood; assesses evidence on the availability of specific nutrients in seafood compared to other food sources; determines the impact of modifying food choices to reduce intake of toxicants on nutrient intake and nutritional status within the U.S. population; develops a decision path for U.S. consumers to weigh their seafood choices to obtain nutritional benefits balanced against exposure risks; and identifies data gaps and recommendations for future research.

The information provided in this book will benefit food technologists, food manufacturers, nutritionists, and those involved in health professions making nutritional recommendations.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!