Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK
list:$21.00
Web:$18.90
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

Free PDF Access

topleft topright

Strategy for an Army Center for Network Science, Technology, and Experimentation (2007)
Board on Army Science and Technology (BAST)

Page
69
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Strategy for an Army Center for Network Science, Technology, and Experimentation

References

Bement, A.L. 1980. Report of the DOD Laboratory Management Task Force. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Research and Advanced Technology).

Boutelle, S., and A. Grasso. 1998. A Case Study: The Central Technical Support Facility. Army RDD&A (now Army Acquisition, Logistics & Technology (AL&T)): pp. 30-33.

Carley, K. 2006. Destabilization of covert networks. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 12(1): 51-66.

Coffey, T., K.W. Lackie, and M.L. Marshall. 2003. Alternative Governance: A Tool for Military Laboratory Reform. Defense Horizons. Available at http://www.ndu.edu/inss/DefHor/DH34/DH34.htm. Accessed April 6, 2007.

Deutch, J. 1987. Report of the 1987 DSB Summer Study on Technology Base Management. Washington, D.C.: Defense Science Board.

DeYoung, D. 2003. The Silence of the Labs. Defense Horizons. Available at http://www.ndu.edu/inss/DefHor/DH21/DH_21.htm. Accessed April 6, 2007.

Gansler, J.S. 1996. Defense Conversion. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Garstka, J., and D. Alberts. 2004. Network Centric Operations: Conceptual Framework Version 2.0. Vienna, Va.: Evidence-Based Research, Inc.

Krygiel, A. 1999. Behind the Wizard’s Curtain: An Integration Environment for System of Systems. Washington, D.C.: National Defense University Press.

Lickteig, C.W., W.R. Sanders, P.J. Durlach, J.W. Lussier, and T.J. Carnahan. 2003. Human Performance Essential to Battle Command: Report on Four Future Combat Systems Command and Control (FCS C2) Experiments. Army Research Institute Report 1812. Alexandria, Va.: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.

Nagle, J.F. 1992. A History of Government Contracting. Washington, D.C.: George Washington University.

National Research Council (NRC). 2004. The Role of Experimentation in Building Future Naval Forces. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2005. Network Science. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

Office of Management and Budget (OMB). 1999. Circular No. A-76. Washington, D.C.: Executive Office of the President.

Page
69

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 69
Strategy for an Army Center for Network Science, Technology, and Experimentation References Bement, A.L. 1980. Report of the DOD Laboratory Management Task Force. Washington, D.C.: Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Research and Advanced Technology). Boutelle, S., and A. Grasso. 1998. A Case Study: The Central Technical Support Facility. Army RDD&A (now Army Acquisition, Logistics & Technology (AL&T)): pp. 30-33. Carley, K. 2006. Destabilization of covert networks. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 12(1): 51-66. Coffey, T., K.W. Lackie, and M.L. Marshall. 2003. Alternative Governance: A Tool for Military Laboratory Reform. Defense Horizons. Available at http://www.ndu.edu/inss/DefHor/DH34/DH34.htm. Accessed April 6, 2007. Deutch, J. 1987. Report of the 1987 DSB Summer Study on Technology Base Management. Washington, D.C.: Defense Science Board. DeYoung, D. 2003. The Silence of the Labs. Defense Horizons. Available at http://www.ndu.edu/inss/DefHor/DH21/DH_21.htm. Accessed April 6, 2007. Gansler, J.S. 1996. Defense Conversion. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Garstka, J., and D. Alberts. 2004. Network Centric Operations: Conceptual Framework Version 2.0. Vienna, Va.: Evidence-Based Research, Inc. Krygiel, A. 1999. Behind the Wizard’s Curtain: An Integration Environment for System of Systems. Washington, D.C.: National Defense University Press. Lickteig, C.W., W.R. Sanders, P.J. Durlach, J.W. Lussier, and T.J. Carnahan. 2003. Human Performance Essential to Battle Command: Report on Four Future Combat Systems Command and Control (FCS C2) Experiments. Army Research Institute Report 1812. Alexandria, Va.: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. Nagle, J.F. 1992. A History of Government Contracting. Washington, D.C.: George Washington University. National Research Council (NRC). 2004. The Role of Experimentation in Building Future Naval Forces. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. NRC. 2005. Network Science. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. Office of Management and Budget (OMB). 1999. Circular No. A-76. Washington, D.C.: Executive Office of the President.

OCR for page 70
Strategy for an Army Center for Network Science, Technology, and Experimentation Owen, D., K.P. Horn, C. Wong, and B.J. Held. 2001. DB-347-A, Applicability of Alternative Organizational Models to Army Laboratories: A Preliminary E-Delphi Analysis. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND. United States District Court (USDC) for the District of Columbia. 2006. Civil Number 05-2183: American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary, United States Department of Defense, et al.

Representative terms from entire chapter:

service laboratory