National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$48.75
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: An Assessment of the Evidence (2008)
Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice (BPH)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix C: Measures Used in the Assessment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder." Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: An Assessment of the Evidence. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2008.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
170
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: An Assessment of the Evidence

Measure

Description

Scales/Factors

Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule-Revised (ADIS-R) (DiNardo and Barlow, 1988)

  • Assesses anxiety and affective disorders

  • Structured diagnostic interview

  • Likert rating scales

 

Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) (Blake et al., 1990)

  • Most widely used measure of PTSD (Weathers et al., 2001)

  • Assesses all DSM-IV PTSD symptoms, impact on functioning, response validity, lifetime diagnosis, and overall PTSD severity

  • Original version, based on DSM-III-R criteria: CAPS-1 (current and lifetime diagnosis, symptoms over past, or worst month since trauma) CAPS-2 (symptoms over past week for repeated assessments)

  • DSM-IV revision with user feedback incorporated: CAPS-1 renamed CAPS-DX (diagnostic version) and CAPS-2 renamed CAPS-SX (symptom status version)

  • Current version, CAPS, combined CAPS-1 and CAPS-2

  • Structured interview

  • 45–60 minute administration by trained (para)professionals

  • 34 items (17 items on frequency, 17 items on intensity)

  • Dichotomous (diagnosis present/ absent) and continuous assessment

  • Five-point Likert ratings of symptom severity (0–4)

  • Time frames for assessment include: past week, month, or worst month since trauma

  • Initially validated on combat veterans, subsequently applied in a wide variety of trauma populations including victims of rape, crime, motor vehicle accidents, incest, torture, and cancer (Weathers et al., 2001)

  • Confirmatory factor analyses supported fit of two-factor structure (Buckley et al., 1998):

  • Intrusion and avoidance, hyperarousal, and numbing

  • Confirmatory factor analyses comparing solutions suggested an oblique 4-factor, first-order solution as the best fit to data (King et al., 1998):

  • Reexperiencing, effortful avoidance, emotional numbing, hyperarousal

Page
170