National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Epilogue
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×

References

ADEC (Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation). 2001. State Air Quality Control Plan, Vol. 2. Analysis of Problems, Control Actions, Section III.C: Fairbanks Transportation Control Program. Adapted July 27, 2001. Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation, Juneau, AK.

Air Improvement Resources, Inc. 1999. Office of the State Auditor Final Report: 1999 Audit of the Colorado AIR Program, November 22, 1999. Novi, MI: Air Improvement Resources, Inc.

Allen, T.H. 2004. Letter to Michael Leavitt, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, by Thomas, H. Allen, U.S. House of Representatives. May 13, 2004 [online]. Available: http://www.rapca.org/publications/ Documents/Letter_from_Congressman_Allen_to_Leavitt.pdf [accessed Nov. 6, 2006].

Andersen, M.E., R.S.H. Yang, H.J. Clewell III, and M.B. Reddy. 2005. Introduction: A historical perspective of the development and applications of PBPK models. Pp. 1-18 in Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling, M.B. Reddy, R.S.H. Yang, H.J. Clewell III, and M.E. Andersen, eds. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.

AQMWG (Air Quality Management Work Group). 2005. Recommendations to the Clean Air Act Advisory Committee. January 2005 [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/air/caaac/aqm/report1-17-05.pdf [accessed April 27, 2007].

Arrhenius, S. 1896. On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground. Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 41:237-275 [online]. Available: http://members.lycos.nl/ErrenWijlens/co2/arrhenius.html [accessed Oct. 30, 2006].

Atkinson, R., and A.C. Lloyd. 1984. Evaluation of kinetic and mechanistic data for modeling of photochemical smog. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 13(2):315-444.

Babendreier, J.E., and K.J. Castleton. 2005. Investigating uncertainty and sensitivity in integrated, multimedia environmental models: Tools for FRAMES-3MRA. Environ. Model. Softw. 20(8):1043-1055.

Bachman, J. 2006. Presentation on Proposal PMcoarse NAAQS. AAQTF Meeting Summary and Decisions, February 28-March 2, 2006, Bethesda, MD [online]. Available: http://www.airquality.nrcs.usda.gov/AAQTF/Documents/Washington_Feb_2006/Draft_Minutes.pdf

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×

[accessed Nov. 6, 2006].

Barnwell, T.O., L.C. Brown, and R.C. Whittemore. 2004. Importance of field data in stream water quality modeling using QUAL2E-UNCAS. J. Environ. Eng. 130(6):643-647.

Bassetti, W.H., and M. Woodward. 2005. Epidemiology: Study Design and Data Analysis, 2nd Ed. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

Bates, J. 2004. Exploratory climate analysis tools for environmental satellite and weather radar data. Pp. 12-27 in Statistical Analysis of Massive Data Streams: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press [online]. Available: http://www.research.att.com/~divesh/meetings/mpds2003/schedule/bates-talk.ppt [accessed Dec. 4, 2006].

Beck, M.B. 1987. Water quality modeling: A review of the analysis of uncertainty. Water Resour. Res. 23(8):1393-1442.

Beck, M.B., ed. 2002a. Environmental Foresight and Models: A Manifesto, 1st Ed. New York: Elsevier.

Beck, M.B. 2002b. Model evaluation and performance. Pp. 1275-1279 in Encyclopedia of Environmetrics, A.H. El-Shaarawi and W.W. Piegorsch, eds. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Beck, M.B. 2005. Environmental foresight and structural change. Environ. Model. Softw. 20(6):651-670.

Beck, M.B., and J. Chen. 2000. Assuring the quality of models designed for predictive tasks. Pp. 401-420 in Sensitivity Analysis, A. Saltelli, K. Chan, and E.M. Scott, eds. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Beck, M.B., J.R. Ravetz, L.A. Mulkey, and T.O. Barnwell. 1997. On the problem of model validation for predictive exposure assessments. Stoch. Hydrol. Hydraul. 11(3):229-254.

Beven, K.J. 1996. Equifinality and uncertainty in geomorphological modelling. Pp. 289-313 in The Scientific Nature of Geomorphology, B.L. Rhoades, and C.E. Thorn, eds. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

Beven, K.J. 2005. On the concept of model structure error. Water Sci. Technol. 52(6):167-175.

Bock, C.A. 1918. History of the Miami Flood Control Project, Part II. The Miami Conservancy District, Dayton, OH [online]. Available: http://cee.engr.ucdavis.edu/faculty/lund/Classes/MiamiConservancy.pdf [accessed Oct. 30, 2006].

Bredehoeft, J.D. 2003. From models to performance assessment: The conceptualization problem. Ground Water 41(5):571-577.

Bredehoeft, J.D. 2005. The conceptualization model problem-surprise.

Hydrogeol. J. 13(1):37-46.

Bredehoeft, J.D., and L.F. Konikow. 1993. Ground-water models: Validate or invalidate. Ground Water 31(2):178-179.

Burden, D. 2004. Environmental Decision Making: Principles and Criteria for Groundwater Fate and Transport Models. Presentation at the First Meeting

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×

on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, March 18, 2004, Washington, DC.

Burges, S.J. 1979. Water resources systems planning in USA: 1776-1976. J. Water Res. Pl.-ASCE 105(1):91-111.

Burtraw, D., and E. Mansur. 1999. Environmental effects of SO2 trading and banking. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33(20):3489-3494.

CARB (California Air Resources Board). 1994. 1994 Low Emission Vehicle and Zero-Emission Vehicle Program Review: Staff Report. Sacramento, CA: California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board. April 1994.

CARB (California Air Resources Board). 2000a. Evaluation of California’s Enhanced Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program (Smog Check II). California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA.

CARB (California Air Resources Board). 2000b. Staff Report: 2000 Zero Emission Vehicle Program Biennial Review. California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board. August 7, 2000 [online]. Available: http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/zevprog/2000review/staffreportfinal.pdf [accessed July 14, 2005].

CARB (California Air Resources Board). 2004. Final Statement of Reasons: The 2003 Amendments to the California Zero Emission Vehicle Program Regulations. California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources Board. January 2004 [online]. Available: http://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/zev2003/fsor.pdf [accessed July 14, 2005].

Caswell, H. 1976. The validation problem. Pp. 313-325 in Systems Analysis and Simulation in Ecology, B.C. Patten, ed., Vol. IV. New York: Academic Press.

CCSP (Climate Change Science Program). 2003. Strategic Plan for Climate Change Science Program Final Report. July 2003 [online]. Available: http:/www.climatescience.gov/Library/stratplan2003/final/ccspstraplan2003-all.pdf [accessed Nov. 6, 2006].

Chameides, W.L., R.W. Lindsay, J. Richardson, and C.S. Kiang. 1988. The role of biogenic hydrocarbons in urban photochemical smog: Atlanta as a case study. Science 241(4872):1473-1475.

Chave, J., and S.A. Levin. 2003. Scale and scaling in ecological and economic systems. Environ. Resour. Econ. 26(4):527-557.

Chow, J.C., J.G. Watson, D. Crow, D.H. Lowenthal, and T. Merrifield. 2001. Comparison of IMPROVE and NIOSH carbon measurements. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 34(1):23-34.

Clarke, D. 2004. Models a la Mode – The Promise and Peril of Integrated Environmental Modeling. Foresight and Governance Project. Publication 2004-2. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC [online]. Available: http://www.environmentalfutures.org/Images/environmentalmodels.pdf [accessed Dec. 4, 2006].

Clemen, R.T. 1995. Making Hard Decisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×

Clewell, H. 2005. The Use of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Improve Chemical Dosimetry in Environmental Risk Assessments. Presentation at the Sixth Meeting on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, December 2, 2005, Washington, DC.

CMAS (Community Modeling and Analysis System). 2006. CMAQ 4.6 Model [online]. Available: www.cmascenter.org/html/models.html [accessed Dec. 14, 2006].

Conolly, R. 2005. Computational Systems Biology: The Integration of Data Across Multiple Levels of Biological Organization to Understand How Perturbations of Normal Biology Become Adverse Health Effects. Presentation at the Sixth Meeting on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, December 2, 2005, Washington, DC.

Crowther, J. 1924. Some considerations relative to the action of x-rays on tissue cells. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 96(674):207-211.

Darier, E., C. Gough, B. De Marchi, S. Funtowicz, R. Grove-White, D. Kitchener, Â. Guimarães-Pereira, S. Shackley, and B. Wynne. 1999. Between democracy and expertise? Citizens’ participation and environmental integrated assessment in Venice (Italy) and St. Helens (UK). J. Environ. Policy Plan. 1(2):103-120.

Daum, P., J. Meagher, D. Allen, and C. Durrenberger. 2002. Accelerated Science Evaluation of Ozone Formation in the Houston-Galveston Area, Executive Summary. Science Synthesis Committee. November 13, 2002 [online]. Available: http://www.utexas.edu/research/ceer/texaqsarchive/pdfs/EXEC_SUMMARY_Nov_02.pdf [accessed Oct. 30, 2006].

Dennis, R.L. 2002. The ozone problem. Pp. 147-169 in Environmental Foresight and Models: A Manifesto, M.B. Beck, ed. New York: Elsevier.

Dimitriades, B., ed. 1977. International Conference on Photochemical Oxidant Pollution and its Control: Proceedings, Vol. II. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC.

Diver, C.S. 1983. The optimal precision of administrative rules. Yale Law J. 93(1):65-109.

Dodge, M.C. 1977. Combined use of modeling techniques and smog chamber data to derive ozone-precursor relationships. Pp. 881-889 in International Conference on Photochemical Oxidant Pollution and Its Control, Vol. II, B. Dimitriades, ed. EPA/600/3-77-001a. Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.

Dolwick, P. 2005. Supplemental Analysis and Weight of Evidence. Presentation at the Third Particulate Matter/Regional Haze/Ozone Modeling Workshop, May 20, 2005, New Orleans, LA [online]. Available: http://cleanairinfo.com/modelingworkshop/presentations/SA_WOE_Dolwick.pdf [accessed Dec. 4, 2006].

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×

Ducca, F. 2004. TRANSIMS – Public Private Cooperation in Software Development. Presentation at the Third Meeting on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, December 2, 2004, Washington, DC.

Eagleton, K. 1999. Mathematical Techniques in Astronomy. Department of History and Philosophy of Science of the University of Cambridge [online]. Available: http://www.hps.cam.ac.uk/starry/mathematics.html [accessed Oct. 30, 2006].

EC (European Commission). 2004. Joint Workshop on Marine Assessment and Monitoring with Emphasis on Eutrophication, Istambul, 21-22 April 2004, Outcome of the Workshop. European Commission Joint Research Centre [online]. Available: http://sea.helcom.fi/dps/docs/documents/Monitoring%20and%20Assessment%20Group%20(MONAS)/MONAS%20Indicator%20Workshop%201,%202004/5-1.pdf [accessed Dec. 14, 2006].

Efroymson, R.E., and D.L. Murphy. 2001. Ecological risk assessment of multimedia hazardous air pollutants: Estimating exposure and effects. Sci. Total Environ. 274(1-3):219-230.

Ellerman, A.D., R. Schmalensee, P.L. Joskow, J.P. Montero, and E.M. Bailey. 1997. Emissions Trading under the U.S. Acid Rain Program: Evaluation of Compliance Costs and Allowance Market Performance. MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Cambridge, MA [online]. Available: http://web.mit.edu/ceepr/www/napap.pdf [accessed Nov. 6, 2006].

Engineering Staff of the Miami Conservancy District. 1922. Appraisal of flood protection benefits and damages. Engineering News-Record 89(Nov. 16):831-835.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1971. Air Quality Criteria for Nitrogen Oxides. AP-84. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. January.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1989. Resolution on the Use of Mathematical Models by EPA for Regulatory Assessment and Decision-Making. EPA-SAB-EEC-89-012. Environmental Engineering Committee, Science Advisory Board, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. January 1989 [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/ord/crem/library/sab_89 resolution_models.pdf [accessed Nov. 7, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1992. Guidelines for Exposure Assessment. EPA/600/Z-92/001. Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. May 1992 [online]. Available: www.epa.gov/ncea/pdfs/guidline.pdf [accessed Feb. 27, 2007].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1994a. Report of the Agency Task Force on Environmental Regulatory Modeling: Guidance, Support Needs, Draft Criteria and Charter. EPA 500-R94-001. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. March 1994.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1994b. Guidance Manual for the Integrated Exposure Uptake Biokinetic Model for Lead in Children.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×

EPA/540/R-93/081. OSWER9285.7-15-1. PB93-963510. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. February 1994 [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/superfund/programs/lead/products.htm [accessed Nov. 2, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1994c. Agency Guidance for Conducting External Peer Review of Environmental Regulatory Modeling. Council for Regulatory Environmental Modeling, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. July 1994 [online]. Available: http://cfpub.epa.gov/crem/modelpr.cfm [accessed Nov. 7, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1996. Review of National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone. Assessment of Scientific and Technical Information OAQPS Staff Paper. EPA-452/R-96-007. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1997a. Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act, 1970 to 1990. Final Report to U.S. Congress. EPA 410/R-97-002. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/oar/sect812/contsetc.pdf [accessed Jan. 20, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1997b. Guiding Principles for Monte Carlo Analysis. EPA/630/R-97/001. Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. March 1997 [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/ncea/raf/montecar.pdf [accessed Nov. 21, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1998. Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment. EPA/630/R-95/002F. Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. April 1998 [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/superfund/programs/nrd/era.htm [accessed Nov. 7, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1999a. Final Report to Congress on Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act, 1990 to 2010. EPA Report to Congress. EPA 410-R-99-001. Office of Air and Radiation, Office of Policy, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. November 1999 [online]. Available: http://epa.gov/oar/sect812/1990-2010/chap1130.pdf [accessed Nov. 7, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1999b. Science Algorithms of the EPA Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality [CMAQ] Modeling System. EPA/600/R-99/030. Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/asmdnerl/CMAQ/CMAQscienceDoc.html [accessed Dec. 14, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1999c. Description of the MOBILE Highway Vehicle Emissions Factor Model. Office of Mobile Sources, Ann Arbor, MI.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1999d. Draft Guidance on the Use of Models and Other Analyses in Attainment Demonstrations for the

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×

8-Hour Ozone NAAQS. EPA-454/R-99-004. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1999e. Total Risk Integrated Methodology: Status Report. EPA-453/R-99-010. Office of Air Quality, Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/fera/trim_fate.html#historical [accessed Nov. 21, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2000. Benchmark Dose Technical Guidance Document. EPA/630/R-00/001. External Review Draft. Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/nceawww1/pdfs/bmds/BMD-External_10_13_ 2000.pdf [accessed June 12, 2007].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2001a. Comparison of Jeffords-Lieberman and Smith-Voinovich-Brownback. Office of Air and Radiation, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/air/finalanalyses.pdf [accessed Oct. 30, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2001b. Economic Analysis of a Multi-Emissions Strategy. Prepared for Senators James M. Jeffords and Joseph I. Lieberman by Office of Air and Radiation, Office of Atmospheric Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. October 31, 2001 [online]. Available: http://www. epa.gov/oar/jeffordslieberm.pdf [accessed Nov. 7, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2001c. General Principles for Performing Aggregate Exposure and Risk Assessments, Final Report. Office of Pesticide Programs, Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. December 2, 2001 [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/oppfead1/trac/science/ [accessed Nov. 7, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2001d. Better Assessment Science Integrating Point and Nonpoint Sources (BASINS), User’s Manual, Version 3.0. EPA-823-H-01-001. Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2002a. Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by the Environmental Protection Agency. EPA/260R-02-008. Office of Environmental Information, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. October 2002 [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/QUALITY/informationguidelines/documents/EPA_InfoQualityGuidelines.pdf [accessed Nov. 1, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2002b. Total Maximum Daily Load for Total Mercury in the Ochlockonee Watershed, GA. Region 4, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. February 28, 2002 [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/Region4/water/tmdl/georgia/ochlockonee/final_tmdls/OchlockoneeHgFinalTMDL.pdf [accessed Nov. 7, 2006].

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2002c. Perchlorate Environmental Contamination: Toxicological Review and Risk Characterization. External Review Draft. NCEA-1-0503. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC [online]. Available: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay. cfm?deid=24002 [accessed Nov. 7, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2002d. Guidance on Cumulative Risk Assessment of Pesticide Chemicals That Have a Common Mechanism of Toxicity. Office of Pesticide Programs, Office of Prevention, Pesticides, and Toxic Substances, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/oppfead1/trac/science/ [accessed Nov. 7, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2002e. Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans for Modeling. EPA/240/R-02/007. Office of Environmental Information, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. December 2002 [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/quality/qs-docs/g5m-final.pdf [accessed Nov. 22, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2003a. Council for Regulatory Environmental Modeling. Memorandum to Assistant Administrators, Associate Administrators, Regional Administrators and Science Policy Council, from Administrator Christine Todd Whitman, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. February 7, 2003 [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/ord/crem/library/whitman.PDF [accessed Nov. 1, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2003b. A Framework for a Computational Toxicology Research Program in ORD. EPA/600/R-03/065. Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. November 2003 [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/comptox/publications/comptoxframework06_02_04.pdf [accessed May 18, 2007].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2003c. RE: Request for Response to/Renewal of Federal Data Quality Act Petition Against Further Dissemination of “Climate Action Report 2002.” Letter to Information Officer, Office of Environmental Information, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, from Christopher C. Horner, Competitive Enterprise Institute [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/quality/informationguidelines/documents/7428.pdf [accessed Nov. 8, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2003d. Draft Guidance on the Development, Evaluation, and Application of Regulatory Environmental Models. The Council for Regulatory Environmental Modeling (CREM), Office of Science Policy, Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC. November 2003 [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/ord/crem/library/CREM%20Guidance%20Draft%2012_03.pdf [accessed Nov. 21, 2006].

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2003e. Multimedia, Multipathway, and Multireceptor Risk Assessment (3MRA) Modeling System, Vol. III. Ensuring Quality of the System, Modules, and Data. EPA 530-D-03-001c. SAB Review Draft. Prepared by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Athens, GA, and Research Triangle Park, NC; Office of Solid Waste, Washington, DC. July 2003 [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/haz waste/id/hwirwste/risk03.htm [accessed Nov. 21, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2003f. Users Guide to MOBILE6.1 and MOBILE6.2: Mobile Source Emission Factor. EPA420-R-03-010. Office of Transportation and Air Quality, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ann Arbor, MI [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/OTAQ/models/mobile6/420r03010.pdf [accessed Nov. 16, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2003g. TRIM.FaTE User’s Guide. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. March 2003 [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/fera/trim_fate.html#current_user [accessed Nov. 4, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2003h. Multimedia, Multipathway, and Multireceptor Risk Assessment (3MRA) Modeling System, Vol. I. Modeling System and Science. EPA 530-D-03-001a. SAB Review Draft. Prepared by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Athens, GA, and Research Triangle Park, NC; Office of Solid Waste, Washington, DC. July 2003 [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/id/hwirwste/risk03.htm#vol1 [accessed Dec. 5, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2004a. An Examination of EPA Risk Assessment Principles and Practices. EPA/100/B-04/001. Office of the Science Advisor, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. March 2004 [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/OSA/pdfs/ratf-final.pdf [accessed Nov. 1, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2004b. Final Regulatory Impact Analysis: Control of Emissions from Nonroad Diesel Engines. EPA 420-R-04-007. Assessment and Standards Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/nonroad-diesel/2004fr/420r04007a.pdf [accessed Nov. 9, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2004c. Air Quality Criteria for Particulate Matter, Vol. 1 and 2. EPA 600/P-99/002aF-bF. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC [online]. Available: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/partmatt.cfm [accessed Nov. 9, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2004d. A Model Comparison: Dietary (Food and Water) Exposure in DEEM/Calendex, CARES, and

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×

Lifeline. Office of Pesticide Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Prepared for FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Meeting, April 28-29, 2004, Arlington, VA [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/meetings/2004/index.htm [accessed Nov. 9, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2004e. EPA’s Multimedia, Multipathway, and Multireceptor Risk Assessment (3MRA) Modeling System; A Review by the 3MRA Review Panel of the EPA Science Advisory. EPA-SAB-05-003. EPA Science Advisory Board, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. November 2004 [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/sab/pdf/sab_05_003.pdf [accessed Nov. 9, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2004f. Policy Guidance on the Use of MOBILE6.2 and the December 2003 AP-42 Method for Re-Entrained Road Dust for SIP Development and Transportation Conformity. Memorandum from Margo Oge, Director, Office of Transportation and Air Quality to EPA Regional Air Division Directors. February 24, 2004 [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/OTAQ/models/mobile6/mobil6.2_letter.pdf [accessed Nov. 16, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2004g. Potential Implications of Genomics for Regulatory and Risk Assessment Applications at EPA. EPA-100/B-04/002. Science Policy Council, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/osa/pdfs/EPA-Genomics-White-Paper.pdf [accessed Dec. 5, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2004h. Nationwide Identification of Hardrock Mining Sites. Evaluation report. Report No. 2004-P-00005. Office of Inspector General, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. March 31, 2004 [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/oig/reports/2004/20040331-2004-p-00005.pdf [accessed Dec. 5, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2005a. Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment EPA/630/P-03/001F. Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. March 2005 [online]. Available: http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=116283 [accessed Nov. 9, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2005b. Review of EPA Region 5 Critical Ecosystem Assessment Model (CrEAM). EPA-SAB-05-011. Science Advisory Board, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/sab/pdf/cream_sab-05-011.pdf [accessed Nov. 10, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2005c. A Set of Scientific Issues Being Considered by the Environmental Protection Agency Regarding: Preliminary N-Methyl Carbamate Cumulative Risk Assessment. SAP Minutes No. 2005-04. FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Meeting, August 23-26, 2005, Arlington, VA [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/meetings/2005/august/minutes.pdf [accessed Nov. 10, 2006].

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2005d. Guidance on the Use of Models and Other Analyses in Attainment Demonstrations for the 8-hour Ozone NAAQS. Draft Final. Office of Air and Radiation, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC. February 17, 2005 [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/scram/guidance/guide/draft-final-o3.pdf [accessed April 27, 2007].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2005e. Regulatory Impact Analysis of the Clean Air Mercury Rule: Final Report. EPA-452/R-05-003. Air Quality Strategies and Standards Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/utility/ria_final.pdf [accessed March 2, 2007].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2006a. Peer Review Handbook, 3rd Ed. EPA/100/B-06/002. Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency by Members of the Per Review Advisory Group, for EPA’s Science Policy Council, Washington, DC [online]. Available: http://epa.gov/peerreview/pdfs/Peer%20Review%20HandbookMay06.pdf [accessed Nov. 10, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2006b. Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants. Air Toxic Website, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/mactfnlalph.html [accessed Nov. 13, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2006c. Models Knowledge Base. Regulatory Environmental Modeling, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [online]. Available: http://cfpub.epa.gov/crem/knowledge_base/knowbase.cfm [accessed Nov. 13, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2006d. Review of Agency Draft Guidance on the Development, Evaluation, and Application of Regulatory Environmental Models and Models Knowledge Base by the Regulatory Environmental Modeling Guidance Review Panel of the EPA Science Advisory Board. EPA-SAB-06-009. EPA Science Advisory Board, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/science1/pdf/sab_06_009.pdf [accessed Nov. 10, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2006e. A Powerful Tool for Managing Watersheds. Better Assessment Science Integrating Point and Nonpoint Sources, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/BASINS/ [accessed Nov. 13, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2006f. Enforcement Economic Models. Civil Enforcement, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/civil/econmodels/index.html [accessed Feb. 27, 2007].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2006g. EPA’s Regulatory Impact Analyses (RIA) for the Revised Ozone and PM NAAQS and Proposed Regional Haze Rule. OAR Policy and Guidance, U.S. Environmental Pro-

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×

tection Agency [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/oarpg/naaqsfin/ria.html [accessed Nov. 14, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2006h. Morbidity and Mortality: How Do We Value the Risk of Death and Illness? National Center for Environmental Economics, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [online]. Available: http://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eerm.nsf/vwRepNumLookup/EE-0497?OpenDocument [accessed Nov. 13, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2006i. Information Quality Guidelines-Requests for Correction (RFC) and Requests for Reconsideration (RFR) Submitted to EPA. EPA Quality Guidelines, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/quality/informationguidelines/iqg-list.html [accessed Nov. 14, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2006j. MOBILE6 Vehicle Emission Modeling Software. Office of Transportation and Air Quality, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/oms/m6.htm [accessed Dec. 14, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2006k. TRIM.FaTE Evaluation Plan Follow-up. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/ttn/fera/trim_fate.html [accessed Nov. 21, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2006l. Modeling Applications and Tools. Support Center for Regulatory Atmospheric Modeling. EPA Technology Transfer Network, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/scram001/dispersion_prefrec.htm [accessed Nov. 30, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2006m. Preferred/Recommended Models. Support Center for Regulatory Atmospheric Modeling. EPA Technology Transfer Network, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/scram001/dispersion_prefrec.htm [accessed Nov. 30, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2006n. Guidance on the Use of Models and Other Analyses for Demonstrating Attainment of Air Quality Goals for Ozone, PM2.5, and Regional Haze, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Modeling Group, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. September 2006 [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/scram001/guidance/guide/draft_final-pm-O3-RH.pdf [accessed Dec. 5, 2006].

EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2007. Enforcement Economic Models. Office of Civil Enforcement, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [online]. Available: http://www.epa.gov/Compliance/civil/econmodels [accessed June 12, 2007].

Fenner, K., M. Scheringer, M. MacLeod, M. Matthies, T. McKone, M. Stroebe, A. Beyer, M. Bonnell, A.C. Le Gall, J. Klasmeier, D. Mackay, D. van de Meent, D. Pennington, B. Scharenberg, N. Suzuki, and F. Wania. 2005.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×

Comparing estimates of persistence and long-range transport potential among multimedia models. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39(7):1932-1942.

Finkel, A.M. 1990. Confronting Uncertainty in Risk Management: A Guide for Decision Makers. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

Finkel, A.M. 2004. Guidelines for Choosing Models that Encourage Research, Reveal the Inevitable Value Judgments, and Promote Sensible Decisions. Presentation at the First Meeting on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, March 18, 2004, Washington, DC.

Finkel, A.M., and J.S. Evans. 1987. Evaluating the benefits of uncertainty reduction in environmental health risk management. JAPCA 37(10):1164-1171.

Fluent, Inc. 2006. A Brief History of Computational Fluid Dynamics [online]. Available: http://www.fluent.com/about/cfdhistory.htm [accessed Nov. 2, 2006].

Foley, G. 2004. U.S. EPA’s Council for Regulatory Environmental Modeling (CREM). Presentation at the First Meeting on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, March 18, 2004, Washington, DC.

Foley, G. 2005. Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) and Environmental Regulatory Modeling. Presentation at the Sixth Meeting on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, December 2, 2005, Washington, DC.

Foley, G.J., P.G. Georgopoulos, and P.J. Lioy. 2003. Accountability within new ozone standards. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37(21):392A-399A.

Freeman, A.M. 1978. Air and water pollution policy. Pp. 12-67 in Current Issues in U.S. Environmental Policy, P. Portney, ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Frey, C. 2004. Methods and Applications of Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis for Models Used in Regulatory Processes. Presentation at the Third Meeting on Environmental Decision Making: Principles and Criteria for Models, December 2, 2004, Washington, DC.

Fujita, E.M., B.E. Croes, C.L. Bennett, D.R. Lawson, F.W. Lurmann, and H.H. Main. 1992. Comparison of emission inventory and ambient concentration ratios of CO, NMOG, and NOx in California’s South Coast Air Basin. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 42(3):264-276.

Funtowicz, S.O., and J.R. Ravetz. 1990. Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

GAO (U.S. General Accounting Office). 1996. Peer Review EPA’s Implementation Remains Uneven: Report to Congressional Requesters. GAO/RCED-96-236. Washington, DC: U.S. General Accounting Office.

Gayer, T., and R.W. Hahn. 2005. Regulating mercury: What’s at stake? Science 310(5749):777-779.

George, J. 2004. State Perspective on Modeling in Support of the TMDL Program. Presentation at the First Meeting on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, March 18, 2004, Washington, DC.

Georgopoulos, P.G., S.W. Wang, V.M. Vyas, Q. Sun, A. Chandrasekar, P. Shade, R. Vedantham, J. Burke, T. McCurdy, and H. Özkaynak. 2005a. A

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×

Source-to-Dose Assessment of Population Exposures to Fine PM, Ozone and Air Toxics in Philadelphia, PA, During a 1999 Summer Episode. A Case Study Employing MENTOR/SHEDS-1A. Technical Report CERM 2005-02. Computational Chemodynamics Laboratory, Environmental and Occupational Health Science Institute, and National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. February 2005 [online]. Available: http://ccl.rutgers.edu/reports/cerm/CCL-CERM_Report-2005-01_philadelphia.pdf [accessed Dec. 5, 2006].

Georgopoulos, P.G., S.W. Wang, V.M. Vyas, Q. Sun, J. Burke, R. Vedantham, T. McCurdy, and H. Özkaynak. 2005b. A source-to-dose assessment of population exposures to fine PM and ozone in Philadelphia, PA, during a summer 1999 episode. J. Expo. Anal. Env. Epid. 15(5):439-457.

Gertler, A.W., J.C. Sagebiel, D.N. Wittorff, W.R. Pierson, W.A. Dippel, D. Freeman, and L. Sheetz. 1997. Vehicle Emissions in Five Urban Tunnels. NTIS/PB97-158091. Desert Research Institute, Nevada University System, Reno.

Gilliland, A. 2003. Overview of Model Evaluation Plans for CMAQ FY04 Release. Presented at the CMAQ Model Peer Review Meeting, December 17, 2003, Research Triangle Park, NC [online]. Available: http://www.cmascenter.org/r_and_d/first_review/pdf/model_evaluation_plans_for_cmaq04_(gilliland).pdf?temp_id=99999 [accessed Nov. 22, 2006].

Gilman, P. 2005. Computation in the Regulatory Environment: Solution or the Problem. Presentation at the Sixth Meeting on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, December 2, 2005, Washington, DC.

Graham, J.D. 2004. OMB’s Circular No. A-4, New Guidelines for the Conduct of Regulatory Analysis. Memorandum for the President’s Management Council, from John Graham, Administrator, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President. March 2, 2004 [online]. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg/memo_pmc_a4.pdf [accessed Nov. 10, 2006].

Greene, D.L., J. Kahn, and R. Gibson. 1999. Fuel economy rebound effect for U.S. households vehicles. Energy J. 20(3):1-31.

Gruenspecht, H.K. 1982. Differentiated regulation: The case of auto emissions standards. Am. Econ. Rev. 72(2):328-331.

Gustavson, K.E., L.W. Barnthouse, C.L. Brierley, E.H. Clarke, C.H. Ward. 2007. Superfund and mining megasites. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41(8): 2667-2672.

Hammitt, J.K. 1990. Subjective-probability-based scenarios for uncertain input parameters. Risk Anal. 10(1):93-102.

Harrington, W. 1989. Enforcement leverage when penalties are restricted. J. Public Econ. 37(1):29-53.

Harrington, W. 1997. Fuel economy and motor vehicle emissions. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 33(3):240-252.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×

Henderson, F.M., and A.J. Lewis. 1998. Principles and Applications of Imaging Radar. New York: Wiley.

Herrick, C. 2000. Predictive modeling of acid rain: Obstacles to generating useful information. Pp. 251-268 in Prediction: Science, Decision Making and the Future of Nature, D. Sarewitz, R.A. Pielke, Jr., and R. Byerly, Jr., eds. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Herrmann, R.A. 1997. The beginnings of differential equation modeling. Pp. 76-87 in Nonstandard Analysis Applied to Advanced Undergraduate Mathematics: Infinitesimal Modeling and Very Elementary Physics. Annapolis, MD: U.S. Naval Academy [online]. Available: http://www.citebase.org/fulltext?format=application%2Fpdf&identifier=oai%3AarXiv.org%3Amath%2F0312432 [accessed Nov. 1, 2006].

Ho, C. 2004. Estimating Motor Vehicle Emissions: A Tale of Two Models. Presentation at the First Meeting on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, March 19, 2004, Washington, DC.

Hoeting, J.A., D. Madigan, A. Raftery, and C.T. Volinsky. 1999. Bayesian model averaging: A tutorial. Stat. Sci. 14(4):382-417.

Holmes, K.J., and R.J. Cicerone. 2002. The road ahead for vehicle emission inspection and maintenance programs. EM(July):15-22.

Holmes, K.J., and J.H. Ellis. 1999. An integrated assessment modeling framework for assessing primary and secondary impacts from carbon dioxide stabilization scenarios. Environ. Model. Assess. 4(1):45-63.

Holmes, K.J., and A.G. Russell. 2001. Improving mobile-source emissions modeling. EM (February):20-28.

Holmes, K.J., and M.W. Wolman. 2001. The early development of systems analysis in natural resources management from man and nature to the Miami Conservancy District. Environ. Manage. 27(2):177-193.

Houk, I.E. 1921. Rainfall and Runoff in the Miami Valley. Technical Report Part 8. Dayton, OH: State of Ohio, Miami Conservancy District [online]. Available: http://www.uamv.com/documents/uam-v_1.31_user’s_guide.pdf [accessed March 31, 2007].

Hubbard, T.N. 1998. An empirical examination of moral hazard in the vehicle inspection market. RAND J. Econ. 29(2):406-426.

Jacobson, M.Z. 2001. GATOR-GCMM: A global-through urban-scale air pollution and weather forecast model. 1. Model design and treatment of subgrid soil, vegetation, roads, rooftops, water, sea ice, and snow. J. Geophys. Res. 106(D6):5385-5402.

Jakeman, A.J., and G.M. Hornberger. 1993. How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model? Water Resour. Res. 29(8):2637-2649.

Jakeman, A.J., R.A. Letcher, and J.P. Norton. 2006. Ten iterative steps in development and evaluation of environmental models. Environ. Modell. Softw. 21(5):602-614.

Janssen, M., and J. Rotmans. 1995. The Evolution of Integrated Assessment Models for Global Climate Change: Towards a New Generation. Prepared

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×

for the Energy Modeling Forum Working Group Meeting, 24-26 May 1995, Stanford University, California.

Janssen, P.H.M., A.C. Petersen, J.P. van der Sluijs, J.S. Risbey, and J.R. Ravetz. 2005. A guidance for assessing and communicating uncertainties. Water Sci. Technol. 52(6):125-131.

Jasanoff, S. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisors as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Jasanoff, S. 2004. Peer Review of Regulatory Models – The Hard Look and the Long View. Presentation at the Third Meeting on Environmental Decision Making: Principles and Criteria for Models, December 2, 2004, Washington, DC.

Jaworska, J.S, M. Comber, C. Auer, and C.J. Van Leeuwen. 2003. Summary of a workshop on regulatory acceptance of (Q)SARs for human health and environmental endpoints. Environ. Health Perspect. 111(10):1358-1360.

Kahn, R. 1997. Earth observation systems: What shall we do with the data we are expecting in 1998? Pp. 15-22 in Massive Data Sets: Proceedings of Workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Kelman, S. 1982. What Price Incentives? Economists and the Environment. Westport, CT: Auburn House.

Klasmeier, J., M. Matthies, M. MacLeod, K. Fenner, M. Scheringer, M. Stroebe, A.C. Le Gall, T.E. McKone, D. van de Meent, and F. Wania. 2006. Application of multimedia models for screening assessment of long-range transport potential and overall persistence. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40(1):53-60.

Kleit, A.N. 1990. The effect of annual changes in automobile fuel economy standards. J. Regul. Econ. 2(2):151-172.

Kneese, A., and C. Schultze. 1975. Pollution, Prices, and Public Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

Konikow, L.F., and J.D. Bredehoeft. 1992. Ground-water models cannot be validated. Adv. Water Resour. 15(1):75-83.

Koop, G., and L. Tole. 2004. Measuring the health effects of air pollution: To what extent can we really say that people are dying from bad air? J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 47(1):30-54.

Krupnick, A., R. Morgenstern, M. Batz, P. Nelsen, D. Butraw, J.S. Shih, and M. McWilliams. 2006. Not a Sure Thing: Making Regulatory Choices Under Uncertainty. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future. February 2006 [online]. Available: http://www.rff.org/rff/Documents/RFF-Rpt-RegulatoryChoices.pdf [accessed Nov. 22, 2006].

Kwoka, J.E., Jr. 1983. The limits of market-oriented regulatory techniques: The case of automotive fuel economy. Q. J. Econ. 98(4):695-704.

Lawson, D.R. 1993. Passing the test – human behavior and California’s Smog Check Program. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 43(12):1567-1575.

Lawson, D.R. 2003. The weekend ozone effect – The Weekly Ambient Emissions Control Experiment. EM (July):17-26.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×

Leighton, P.A. 1961. Photochemistry of Air Pollution. New York: Academic Press.

Liao, H., P.J. Adams, S.H. Chung, J.H. Seinfeld, L.J. Mickley, and D.J. Jacob. 2003. Interactions between tropospheric chemistry and aerosols in a unified general circulation model. J. Geophys. Res. 108(D1):4001 doi:10.1029/2001JD001260.

Liao, H., J.H. Seinfeld, P.J. Adams, and L.J. Mickley. 2004. Global radiative forcing of coupled tropospheric ozone and aerosols in a unified general circulation model. J. Geophys. Res. 109(D16):16207 doi:10.1029/ 2003JD004456.

Linkov, I., and D. Burmistrov. 2003. Model uncertainty and choices made by modelers: Lessons learned from the International Atomic Energy Agency Model Intercomparisons. Risk Anal. 23(6):1297-1308.

Lioy, P.J. 1990. Assessing total human exposure to contaminants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 24(7):938-945.

Lotka, A.J. 1925. Elements of Physical Biology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins Co.

Lund, J.R., and R.N. Palmer. 1997. Water resources system modeling for conflict resolution. Water Resour. Update 3(108):70-82 [online]. Available: http://www.tag.washington.edu/papers/papers/Lund-and-Palmer.1997.WaterResourcesUpdate.108,70-82.pdf [accessed Dec. 5, 2006].

Magat, W., A.J. Krupnick, and W. Harrington. 1986. Rules in the Making: A Statistical Analysis of Regulatory Agency Behavior. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

Mahoney, M.S. 1998. The mathematical realm of nature. Pp. 702-758 in Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, Vol. 1, D.E. Garber and M. Ayers, eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Marsh, G.P. 1864. Man and Nature. Anotated reprint, 1965, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

McGarity, T.O., and W.E. Wagner. 2003. Legal aspects of the regulatory use of environmental modeling. Environ. Law Rep. 33(10):10751-10774.

Mesterton-Gibbons, M. 1995. A Concrete Approach to Mathematical Modelling. New York: J. Wiley & Sons.

Mollan, C. 2004. Orrery by Gilkerson and Co. National Inventory of Scientific Instruments, Royal Dublin Society. Armagh Observatory [online]. Available: http://star.arm.ac.uk/history/instruments/Glikerson-orrery.html [accessed Nov. 2, 2006].

Morales, K.H., L. Ryan, T.L. Kuo, M.M. Wu, and C.J. Chen. 2000. Risk of internal cancers from arsenic in drinking water. Environ. Health Perspect. 108(7):655-661.

Morales, K.H., J.G. Ibrahim, C.J. Chen, and L.M. Ryan. 2006. Bayesian model averaging with applications to benchmark dose estimation for arsenic in drinking water. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 101(473):9-17.

Morgan, A.E. 1951. The Miami Conservancy District, 1st Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×

Morgan, G. 2004. Parameter and Model Uncertainty in Models for Regulatory Decision Making: Problems and Opportunities. Presentation at the Third Meeting on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, December 2, 2004, Washington, DC.

Morgan, G.M., and M. Henrion. 1990. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty on Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Morgan, M.G., S.C. Morris, A.K. Meier, and D.L. Shenk. 1978. A probabilistic methodology for estimating air pollution health effects from coal-fired power plants. Energy Syst. Policy 2(3):287-310.

Morgan, M.G., S.C. Morris, M. Henrion, D.A.L. Amaral, and W.R. Rish. 1984. Technical uncertainty in quantitative policy analysis: A sulfur air pollution example. Risk Anal. 4(3):201-216.

Morgenstern, R. 2005. Making Regulatory Choices: What’s Uncertainty Have to Do with It? Presentation at the Sixth Meeting on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, December 2, 2005, Washington, DC.

Murphy, D.L., and H. Richmond. 2004. OAQPS Risk Assessment. Presentation to EPA Science Advisory Board, Joint Meeting of the Environmental Health Committee and Integrated Human Exposure Committee, July 26, 2004, Washington, DC.

Murrell, P. 2006. R Graphics. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

NAPAP (National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program). 1990. 1990 Integrated Assessment Report. Washington, DC: NAPAP Office of the Director.

Napolitano, S., and E. Lieberman. 2004. EPA Use of ICF’s Integrated Planning Model. Presentation at the Third Meeting on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, December 2, 2004, Washington, DC.

NARSTO. 2004. Particulate Matter Assessment for Policy Makers: A NARSTO Assessment, P. McMurry, M. Shepherd, and J. Vickery, eds. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

NARSTO. 2005. Improving Emissions Inventories for Effective Air Quality Management Across North America: A NARSTO Assessment. NARSTO-05-001. Prepared by the NARSTO Emission Inventory Assessment Team [online]. Available: http://www.narsto.org/section.src?SID=8 [accessed March 5, 2007].

Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2001. Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Malden, MA: Polity/Blackwell.

NRC (National Research Council). 1983. Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 1991. Rethinking the Ozone Problem in Urban and Regional Air Pollution. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 1994. Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×

NRC (National Research Council). 1998. Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter: I. Immediate Priorities and a Long-Range Research Portfolio. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 1999a. Arsenic in Drinking Water. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 1999b. Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter: II. Evaluating Research Progress and Updating the Portfolio. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 2000. Modeling Mobile-Source Emissions. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 2001a. Evaluating Vehicle Emissions Inspection and Maintenance Programs. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 2001b. Arsenic in Drinking Water 2001 Update. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 2001c. Assessing the TMDL Approach to Water Quality Management. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 2001d. Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter: III. Early Research Progress. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 2002. Estimating the Public Health Benefits of Proposed Air Pollution Regulations. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 2003. Adaptive Monitoring and Assessment for the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 2004a. Air Quality Management in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 2004b. Implementing Climate and Global Change Research: A Review of the Final U.S. Climate Change Science Program Strategic Plan. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 2004c. Research Priorities for Airborne Particulate Matter: IV. Continuing Research Progress. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 2005a. Superfund and Mining Megasites. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 2005b. Health Implications of Perchlorate Ingestion. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 2005c. State and Federal Standards for Mobile Source Emissions. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 2006a. Human Biomonitoring for Environmental Chemicals. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 2006b. Toxicity Testing for Assessment of Environmental Agents. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×

O’Connor, J.J., and E.F. Robertson. 2003. History Topic: Mathematics and the Physical World [online]. Available: http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/HistTopics/World.html [accessed Nov. 2, 2006].

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2002. Report of the OECD/UNEP Workshop on the Use of Multimedia Models for Estimating Overall Environmental Persistence and Long-Range Transport Potential in the Context of PBTs/POPs Assessment. ENV/JM/MONO (2002)15. OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No. 36. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris. August 9, 2002 [online]. Available: http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2002doc.nsf/43bb6130e5e86e5fc12569fa005d004c/150147753d5c7f6cc1256c010047d31d/$FILE/JT00130274.PDF [accessed April 27, 2007].

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2004. Guidance Document on the Use of Multimedia Models for Estimating Overall Environmental Persistence and Long-Range Transport. ENV/JM/ MONO(2004)5. OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No. 45. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris. March 18, 2004 [online]. Available: http://appli1.oecd.org/olis/2004doc.nsf/43bb6130e5e86e5fc12569fa005d004c/d5d405dd127503abc1256e5b00541567/$FILE/JT00160339.PDF [accessed April 27, 2007].

OMB (U.S. Office of Management and Budget). 2001. Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality, Objectivity, Utility, and Integrity of Information Disseminated by Federal Agencies. Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President [online]. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg/final_information_quality_guidelines.html [accessed Oct. 12, 2006].

OMB (U.S. Office of Management and Budget). 2003. Regulatory Analysis. Circular A-4 to the Heads of Executive Agencies and Establishments, September 17, 2003 [online]. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a004/a-4.pdf [accessed Nov. 3, 2006].

OMB (U.S. Office of Management and Budget). 2004. Final Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review. Office of Management and Budget. December 15, 2004 [online]. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg/peer2004/peer_bulletin.pdf [accessed Oct. 12, 2006].

OMB (U.S. Office of Management and Budget). 2005. Validating Regulatory Analysis: 2005 Report to Congress on the Costs and Benefits of Federal Regulations and Unfunded Mandates on State, Local, and Tribal Entities. Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC [online]. Available: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/inforeg/2005_cb/final_2005_cb_report.pdf [accessed Nov. 13, 2006].

Oreskes, N. 1998. Evaluation (not validation) of quantitative models. Environ. Health Perspect. 106(suppl. 6):1453-1460.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×

Oreskes, N., K. Shrader-Frechette, and K. Belitz. 1994. Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science 263(5147):641-646.

Pascual, G. 2004. Wresting Regulatory Decisions from an Uncertain World. Presentation at the Third Meeting on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, December 2, 2004, Washington, DC.

Perciasepe, R. 2005. Use of Modeling in Decision-Making at EPA. Presentation at the Sixth Meeting on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, December 2, 2005, Washington, DC.

Petersen, B. 2004. Why Use Proprietary Software for Risk Assessment. Presentation at the Third Meeting on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, December 2, 2004, Washington, DC.

Pierce, R.G. 1988. Two problems in administrative law: Political polarity on the District of Columbia circuit and judicial deterrence of agency rulemaking. Duke Law J. 1988(2/3):300-328.

Pope, C.A. 1989. Respiratory disease associated with community air pollution and a steel mill, Utah Valley. Am. J. Public Health 79(5):623-628.

Portney, P.R., I.W.H. Parry, H.K. Gruenspecht, and W. Harrington. 2003. The Economics of Fuel Economy Standards. Paper No. 03-44. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

Preuss, P. 2006. EPA’s Advances in Human Health Assessment Research. Presentation at the Joint Meeting of the Environmental Health Committee and the Integrated Human Exposure Committee, EPA Science Advisory Board, September 6, 2006, Washington, DC.

Ramaswami, A., J.B. Milford, and M.J. Small. 2005. Integrated Environmental Modeling – Pollutant Transport, Fate and Risk in the Environment. Hoboken, NJ: J. Wiley.

Reckhow, K. 2005. Integrating Modeling and Monitoring in Adaptive Strategies to Attain Water Quality Standards. Presentation at the Sixth Meeting on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, December 2, 2005, Washington, DC.

Reddy, M.B, R.S. Yang, H.J. Clewell, and M.E. Andersen. 2005. Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling: Science and Applications. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Refsgaard, J.C., J.P. van der Sluijs, J. Brown, and P. van der Keur. 2006. A framework for dealing with uncertainty due to model structure error. Adv. Water Resour. 29(11):1586-1597.

Reynolds, S.D., P.M. Roth, and J.H. Seinfeld. 1973. Mathematical modeling of photochemical air pollution. 1. Formulation of the model. Atmos. Environ. 7:1033-1061.

Risbey, J., J.P. van der Sluijs, P. Klopprogge, J.R. Ravetz, S. Funtowicz, and S.C. Quintana. 2005. Application of a checklist for quality assistance in environmental modelling to an energy model. Environ. Model. Assess. 10(1):63-79.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×

Roberts, L. 1991. Learning from an acid rain program. Science 251(4999):1302-1305.

Rotmans, J. 1990. IMAGE: An Integrated Model to Assess the Greenhouse Effect. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

Rubin, E.S. 1992. Global Warming Research: Learning from NAPAP’s Mistakes. Contemporary Issues Series 53. Center for the Study of American Business, Washington University, St. Louis, MO [online]. Available: http://www.iecm-online.com/publications.html [accessed Dec. 11, 2005].

Rubin, K. 1985. Efficient Investment in Wastewater Treatment Plants. Washington, DC: Congressional Budget Office.

Russell, A., and R. Dennis. 2000. NARSTO critical review of photochemical models and modeling. Atmos. Environ. 34(12-14):2283-2324.

Sass, J. 2004. Natural Resource Defense Council’s Perspective on Environmental Modeling. Presentation at the First Meeting on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, March 18, 2004, Washington, DC.

Scheffe, R.D., and R.E. Morris. 1993. A review of the development and application of the Urban Airshed model. Atmos. Environ. B-Urb. 27(1):23-39.

Scheringer, M. 1996. Persistence and spatial range as endpoints of an exposure-based assessment of organic chemicals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30(5):1652-1659.

Scheringer, M. 1997. Characterization of the environmental distribution behavior of organic chemicals by means of persistence and spatial range. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31(10):2891-2897.

Scheringer, M., M. MacLeod, and F. Wegmann. 2006. The OECD Pov and LRTP Screening Tool, Version 2.0 — Software and Manual. http://www.sust-chem.ethz.ch/downloads/Tool2_0_Manual.pdf [accessed April 27, 2007].

Schertzer, W.M., and D.C.L. Lam. 2002. Lake Erie and evolving issues of the quality of its water. Pp. 105-130 in Environmental Foresight and Models: A Manifesto, M.B. Beck, ed. Oxford: Elsevier.

Schichl, H. 2004. Models and history of modeling. Pp. 25-36 in Modeling Languages in Mathematical Optimization, J. Kallrath, ed. Boston: Kluwer.

Schnoor, J.L. 1996. Environmental Modeling: Fate and Transport of Pollutants in Water, Air, and Soil. New York: Wiley.

Schwab, M. 2004. OMB Experience (and Frustration) with Models Used in Environmental Decision Making. Presentation at the Third Meeting on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, December 2, 2004, Washington, DC.

Setzer, W. 2005. Dose-Response Modeling for Hazard Characterization of Environmental Contaminants. Presentation at the Sixth Meeting on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, December 2, 2005, Washington, DC.

Shapiro, S.A., R. Steinzor, and M. Clune. 2006. Ossifying Ossification: Why the Information Quality Act Should Not Provide for Judicial Review. CPR White Paper No. 601. February 2006 [online]. Available: http://www.progressivereform.org/articles/CPR_IQA_601.pdf

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×

[accessed April 27, 2007].

Shoemaker, L. 2004. Modeling and Decision Making Overview. Presentation at the First Meeting on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, March 18, 2004, Washington, DC.

Singer, B.C., and R.A. Harley. 2000. A fuel-based inventory of motor vehicle exhaust emissions in the Los Angeles area during summer 1997. Atmos. Environ. 34(11):1783-1795.

Slaughter, S. 2004. Center for Regulatory Effectiveness’ Perspective on Environmental Modeling. Presentation at the First Meeting on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, March 18, 2004, Washington, DC.

Starfield, A.M., and A.L. Bleloch. 1991. Building Models for Conservation and Wildlife Management, 2nd Ed. Edina, MN: Burgess Press.

Stavins, R.N. 1998. What can we learn from the Grand Policy Experiment? Lessons from SO2 allowance trading. J. Econ. Perspect. 12(3):69-88.

Stedman, D.H. 1989. Automobile carbon monoxide emission. Environ. Sci. Technol. 23(2):147-148.

Stedman, D.H., G.A. Bishop, P. Aldrete, and R.S. Slott. 1997. On-road evaluation of an automobile emission test program. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31(3):927-931.

Swayne, D.F., D. Cook, and A. Buja. 2002. XGobi-A System for Multivariate Data Visualization. AT&T [online]. Available: http://www.research.att.com/areas/stat/xgobi/ [accessed Nov. 27, 2006].

Taylor, G.I. 1915. Eddy motion in the atmosphere. Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A 215:1-26.

Tang, T., M. Roberts, and C. Ho. 2003a. Sensitivity Analysis of MOBILE6 Mobile Source Emissions Factor Model. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.

Tang, T., M. Claggett, J. Byun, M. Roberts J. Granell, and D. Aspy. 2003b. MOBILE6.2 Air Toxic Trend and Sensitivity Analysis, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration.

TCEQ (Texas Commission on Environmental Quality). 2004. Required control strategy elements. Chapter 5 in Revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the Control of Ozone Air Pollution: Houston/Galveston/Brazoria Ozone Nonattainment Area. Project No. 2004-042-SIP-NR. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Austin, TX [online]. Available: http://www.tnrcc.state.tx.us/oprd/sips/june2004hgb_EDrec.html#docs [accessed June 8, 2005].

Thompson, M. 1989. Postscript: Engineering and anthropology: Is there a difference? Pp. 138-150 in Environmental Threats: Perception, Analysis and Management, J. Brown, ed. New York: Belhaven.

Thompson, M., M. Warburton, and T. Hatley. 1986. Uncertainty on a Himalayan Scale. London: Milton Ash Editions/Ethnographica.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×

Tierney, G. 2004. Decision Making with Mobile Source Models. Presentation at the First Meeting on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, March 18, 2004, Washington, DC.

Tinbergen, J. 1937. An Econometric Approach to Business Cycle Problems. Paris: Hermann & Co.

Tunkel, J., K. Mayo, C. Austin, A. Hickerson, and P. Howard. 2005. Practical considerations on the use of predictive models for regulatory purposes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39(7):2188-2199.

van der Sluijs, J.P., J.S. Risbey, P. Kloprogge, J.R. Ravetz, S.O. Funtowicz, S.C. Quintana, Â. Guimarães Pereira, B. De Marchi, A.C. Petersen, P.H.M. Janssen, R. Hoppe, and S.W.F. Huijs. 2003. RIVM/MNP Guidance for Uncertainty Assessment and Communication: Detailed Guidance. Utrecht University, The Netherlands [online]. Available: http://www.nusap.net/downloads/detailedguidance.pdf [accessed April 27, 2007].

van der Sluijs, J.P., P.H.M. Janssen, A.C. Petersen, P. Kloprogge, J.S. Risbey, W. Tuinstra, and J.R. Ravetz. 2004. RIVM/MNP Guidance for Uncertainty Assessment and Communication: Tool Catalogue for Uncertainty Assessment. Report No. NWS-E-2004-37. Utrecht University, The Netherlands [online]. Available: http://www.nusap.net/downloads/ toolcatalogue.pdf [accessed April 27, 2007].

Volinsky, C.T., D. Madigan, A.E. Raftery, and R.A. Kronmal. 1997. Bayesian model averaging in proportional hazard models: Assessing the risk of the stroke. Appl. Statist. 46(4):433-448.

Vollenweider, R.A. 1968. Scientific Fundamentals of the Eutrophication of Lakes and Flowing Waters with Particular Reference to Nitrogen and Phosphorus as Factors in Eutrophication. Report DAS/CSI/68.27. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Voltaggio, T. 2004. Environmental Modeling – A Regional Perspective. Presentation at the First Meeting on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, March 18, 2004, Washington, DC.

Wallsten, T.S., D.V. Budescu, A. Rapoport, R. Zwick, and B. Forsyth. 1986. Measuring the vague meaning of probability terms. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 115(4):348-365.

Wania, F., and D. Mackay. 1995. A global distribution model for persistent organic chemicals. Sci. Total Environ. 160/161:211-232.

Wania, F., and D. Mackay. 1999. Global chemical fate of ά-hexachlorocyclohexane. 2. Use of a global distribution model for mass balancing, source apportionment, and trend prediction. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 18(7):1400-1407.

Watson, J.G, J.C. Chow, and E.M. Fujita. 2001. Review of volatile organic compound source apportionment by chemical mass balance. Atmos. Environ. 35(9):1567-1584.

Weart, S. 2003. The Discovery of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×

Weaver, J. 2004. Modeling Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Presentation at the First Meeting on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, March 18, 2004, Washington, DC.

Weed, D.L. 2005. Weight of evidence: A review of concept and methods. Risk Anal. 25(6):1545-1557.

Wenzel, T. 2001. Evaluating the long-term effectiveness of the Phoenix IM240 program. Environ. Sci. Policy 4(6):377-389.

Werick, W.J. 1995. National Study of Water Management During Drought. IWR Report 94-NDS-12. Water Resources Center, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Belvoir, VA. September 1995.

Woodward, S.M. 1920. Hydraulics of the Miami Flood Control Project. Technical Report Part 7. Dayton, OH: Miami Conservancy District.

Wool, T. 2004. Overview of the TMDL Program and Modeling Approaches. Presentation at the First Meeting on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process, March 18, 2004, Washington, DC.

Zhang, Y., B. Pun, K. Vijayaraghavan, S.Y. Wu, C. Seigneur, S.N. Pandis, M.Z. Jacobson, A. Nenes, and J.H. Seinfeld. 2004. Development and application of the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution. J. Geophys. Res. 109:D01202. doi:10.1029/2003 JD003501.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×
Page 201
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×
Page 202
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×
Page 203
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×
Page 204
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×
Page 205
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×
Page 206
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×
Page 207
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×
Page 208
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×
Page 209
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×
Page 210
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×
Page 211
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×
Page 212
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×
Page 213
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×
Page 214
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×
Page 215
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×
Page 216
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×
Page 217
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×
Page 218
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×
Page 219
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×
Page 220
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×
Page 221
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×
Page 222
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×
Page 223
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×
Page 224
Suggested Citation:"References." National Research Council. 2007. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11972.
×
Page 225
Next: Glossary »
Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making Get This Book
×
 Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making
Buy Paperback | $65.00 Buy Ebook | $54.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Many regulations issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are based on the results of computer models. Models help EPA explain environmental phenomena in settings where direct observations are limited or unavailable, and anticipate the effects of agency policies on the environment, human health and the economy. Given the critical role played by models, the EPA asked the National Research Council to assess scientific issues related to the agency's selection and use of models in its decisions. The book recommends a series of guidelines and principles for improving agency models and decision-making processes. The centerpiece of the book's recommended vision is a life-cycle approach to model evaluation which includes peer review, corroboration of results, and other activities. This will enhance the agency's ability to respond to requirements from a 2001 law on information quality and improve policy development and implementation.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!