National Academies Press: OpenBook
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×

ASSESSMENT OF THE NASA APPLIED SCIENCES PROGRAM

Committee on Extending Observations and Research Results to Practical Applications: A Review of NASA’s Approach

Geographical Sciences Committee

Board on Earth Sciences and Resources

Division on Earth and Life Studies

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS

Washington, D.C. www.nap.edu

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS

500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001

NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.

The opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations contained in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the agency that provided support for the project. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. government. The study was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under Contract No. NNH05CC15C/TO106.

International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-11075-4

International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-11075-0

Additional copies of this report are available from the

National Academies Press,

500 Fifth Street, N.W., Lockbox 285, Washington, DC 20055; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area); Internet http://www.nap.edu.

Cover: Designed by Michael Dudzik. The three images at the top depict three applications areas from the NASA Applied Sciences Program, agriculture, aviation, and water management (courtesy of the NASA Applied Science Program). The bottom Landsat 7 image shows the distribution of sediment washed into the ocean off the North Carolina coast as a result of Hurricane Floyd’s rains (courtesy of NASA’s Visible Earth Project, http://visibleearth.nasa.gov/).

Copyright 2007 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Printed in the United States of America

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

Advisers to the Nation on Science, Engineering, and Medicine


The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences.


The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Charles M. Vest is president of the National Academy of Engineering.


The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine.


The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. Charles M. Vest are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council.


www.national-academies.org

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×

COMMITTEE ON EXTENDING OBSERVATIONS AND RESEARCH RESULTS TO PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: A REVIEW OF NASA’S APPROACH

THOMAS J. WILBANKS, Chair,

Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee

MICHAEL J. AUERBACH,

Desert Research Institute, Reno, Nevada

NANCY M. DICKSON,

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

GEORGE L. FREDERICK,

Falcon Consultants LLC, Georgetown, Texas

B. JOHN GARRICK, Private consultant,

Laguna Beach, California

JOHN R. JENSEN,

University of South Carolina, Columbia

THOMAS L. MOTE,

University of Georgia, Athens

FRANK E. MULLER-KARGER,

University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth and University of South Florida, St. Petersburg

DENNIS OJIMA,

The H. John Heinz III Center for Science, Economics and the Environment, Washington, D.C. and Colorado State University, Fort Collins

JONATHAN A. PATZ,

University of Wisconsin, Madison

JAMES RATTLING LEAF SR.,

Sinte Gleska University, Mission, South Dakota

ANDREW R. SOLOW,

Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts

National Research Council Staff

ELIZABETH A. EIDE, Study Director (Until October 2006 and from May 2007)

PAUL M. CUTLER, Study Director (From October 2006 through June 2007)

JARED P. ENO, Senior Program Assistant (Until April 2006)

NICHOLAS D. ROGERS, Senior Program Assistant (From April 2006)

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×

GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES COMMITTEE

ROGER M. DOWNS, Chair,

The Pennsylvania State University, University Park

LUC E. ANSELIN,

University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

WILLIAM A. V. CLARK,

University of California, Los Angeles

SUSAN L. CUTTER,

University of South Carolina, Columbia

WILLIAM E. EASTERLING III,

The Pennsylvania State University, University Park

PATRICIA GOBER,

Arizona State University, Tempe

CAROL P. HARDEN,

University of Tennessee, Knoxville

CALESTOUS JUMA,

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts

VICTORIA A. LAWSON,

University of Washington, Seattle

JONATHAN D. MAYER,

University of Washington, Seattle

THOMAS M. PARRIS,

ISciences LLC, Burlington, Vermont

NORBERT P. PSUTY,

Rutgers University, Sandy Hook

DAVID L. SKOLE,

Michigan State University, East Lansing

National Research Council Staff

PAUL M. CUTLER, Senior Program Officer

CAETLIN M. OFIESH, Research Associate

VERNA J. BOWEN, Administrative and Financial Associate

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×

BOARD ON EARTH SCIENCES AND RESOURCES

GEORGEM. HORNBERGER, Chair,

University of Virginia, Charlottesville

GREGORY B. BAECHER,

University of Maryland, College Park

STEVEN R. BOHLEN,

Joint Oceanographic Institutions, Washington, D.C.

KEITH C. CLARKE,

University of California, Santa Barbara

DAVID COWEN,

University of South Carolina, Columbia

WILLIAM E. DIETRICH,

University of California, Berkeley

ROGER M. DOWNS,

The Pennsylvania State University, University Park

JEFF DOZIER,

University of California, Santa Barbara

KATHERINE H. FREEMAN,

The Pennsylvania State University, University Park

RHEA L. GRAHAM,

Pueblo of Sandia, Bernalillo, New Mexico

RUSSELL J. HEMLEY,

Carnegie Institution of Washington, District of Columbia

MURRAY W. HITZMAN,

Colorado School of Mines, Golden

V. RAMA MURTHY,

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (retired)

CLAYTON NICHOLS,

Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (retired), Standpoint

RAYMOND A. PRICE,

Queen’s University, Ontario, Canada

BARBARA A. ROMANOWICZ,

University of California, Berkeley

JOAQUIN RUIZ,

University of Arizona, Tucson

MARK SCHAEFER,

Global Environment and Technology Foundation, Arlington, Virginia

WILLIAM W. SHILTS,

Illinois State Geological Survey, Champaign

RUSSELL STANDS-OVER-BULL,

Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Billings, Montana

TERRY C. WALLACE JR.,

Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico

THOMAS J. WILBANKS,

Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee

National Research Council Staff

ANTHONY R. DE SOUZA, Director

PAUL M. CUTLER, Senior Program Officer

ELIZABETH A. EIDE, Senior Program Officer

DAVID A. FEARY, Senior Program Officer

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×

ANNE M. LINN, Senior Program Officer

ANN G. FRAZIER, Program Officer

SAMMANTHA L. MAGSINO, Program Officer

RONALD F. ABLER, Senior Scholar

CAETLIN M. OFIESH, Research Associate

JENNIFER T. ESTEP, Administrative Associate

VERNA J. BOWEN, Administrative and Financial Associate

JARED P. ENO, Senior Program Assistant

NICHOLAS D. ROGERS, Senior Program Assistant

TONYA E. FONG YEE, Program Assistant

Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×

PREFACE

The Applied Sciences Program (ASP) is the focus for Earth science applications at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) today. NASA’s draft plan for the present structure of ASP was reviewed by the National Research Council (NRC, 2002a) and in 2004, NASA published its draft plan in response to the NRC report. One of the recommendations from the NRC report was for the ASP to seek another independent evaluation after several years of operation in its new structure. NASA and the ASP leadership thus asked the NRC in 2005 to form an ad hoc committee to assess their approach to extend research results to practical societal applications. In response to this request the NRC established the Committee on Extending Observations and Research Results to Practical Applications. The assessment was designed to focus on ASP’s overall approach, including the program’s strengths and weaknesses in realizing societal benefits through Earth observations, and the extent and success of ASP’s engagement of federal and nonfederal sectors to use NASA data and research in decision-support systems.

The committee consisted of 12 individuals with experience in generating and applying remotely sensed data in decision-support projects, users of decision-support tools, researchers producing results incorporated in decision-support tools, and scientists with experience in determining the types of information and tools that users require (Appendix A). To address its statement of task, the committee reviewed relevant NRC reports and information submitted by external sources, including written data and information requested from ASP (Appendix B; ASP, 2006). Presentations at three open meetings in 2006 (Appendix C) and information from telephone interviews, published reports and other literature, and the committee’s own experience were also part of the assessment process. Additional information was requested from several federal agencies subsequent to the committee’s three open informational meetings. The committee’s final meeting in October 2006 was a closed session in which the committee deliberated the main conclusions and recommendations for the report.

The committee benefited during its writing process from the results of a recent NRC report “Earth Science and Applications from Space: National Imperatives for the Next Decade and Beyond” (NRC, 2007a),

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×

which recommended primary issues NASA should consider during the next decade in applying its Earth data and research to achieve societal benefits. Some of these recommendations have direct relevance for ASP and are examined briefly in this report. Where appropriate, the committee attempted throughout the report to maintain a distinction between which issues were those that could be considered more broadly NASA’s responsibilities versus those issues that were specific to ASP.

With a need to address both established, ongoing partnerships and potential partners who had little or no current activity with NASA through the ASP, the committee took a broad approach to its information-gathering and sought expert input from a variety of federal agencies and nongovernmental organizations representative of this range of existing and potential partners and users of NASA products. The committee attempted to gain a similar, representative level of input from all testimony it received through posing a set of questions to all of its external information providers. The committee opted to obtain slightly more detailed responses from a portion of this testimony group. The committee was grateful for a detailed, written response to committee questions from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), provided through the NOAA Research Council (NOAA Research Council, 2006). In the case of the federal agencies, the committee received generally constructive and immediate responses, but did not receive responses to its inquiries from a few agencies with established NASA partnerships, despite several attempts to reach these offices. Lack of response could indicate that the agency had no information to provide, or possibly that the committee might not have contacted the correct persons to respond appropriately. Without resources to provide follow-up in each case of no response, the committee determined that it had obtained adequate responses from a broad enough spectrum of users of NASA products to reach its conclusions and recommendations with confidence.

As a final point, the report contains a historical overview of applied sciences at NASA that was not a specific part of the committee’s charge but which the committee felt provided important context for the present ASP structure. Because the committee could identify no official documentation of this history, the information contained in this section of the report represents a summary of the results of telephone discussions with 14 individuals either formerly or currently with NASA or directly involved in NASA projects. Though some subjectivity in the nature of information gathered in this fashion is inevitable, the accuracy of the information was fact-checked with present and former ASP staff and effort was made in writing the text to maintain its overall objectivity.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×

This report and its recommendations are a result of the consensus of the committee. The recommendations address the statement of task and apply to NASA and ASP, but the needs of other agencies, and nonfederal groups that use or could use NASA data factored into the committee’s deliberations and its recommendations. Members of the committee provided keen insights and took part in drafting the report. We were assisted in our efforts by Elizabeth Eide and Paul Cutler, study directors, and Nicholas Rogers, senior program assistant, from the NRC.


Thomas J. Wilbanks

Chair

August 2007

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Page xiii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This report was greatly enhanced by input from numerous contributors (Appendix C): Robert Adler, Laurie Ames, Chris Barnard, Ronald Birk, Otis Brown, Pietro Ceccato, Brad Colman, Brad Doorn, Paul Doraiswamy, Marty Frederick, Lawrence Friedl, Teresa Fryberger, Gerald Galloway, Shahid Habib, Robert Harriss, Charles Hutchinson, Anthony Janetos, John Kappenman, Jack Kaye, John LaBrecque, Ricardo Lopez-Torrijos, Alexis Lugo-Fernandez, Nancy Maynard, Ken Miller, John Murray, Scott Pace, Fritz Policelli, Diane Powers, Sethu Raman, Mitch Roffer, Cynthia Rosenzweig, Joseph Russo, Ed Sheffner, Michael Steinberg, J. Marshall Shepherd, Alex Toyahov, Louis Uccellini, Charles Walthall, Mark Weltz, and Dorsey Worthy. These presentations and discussions set the stage for the committee’s deliberations in the sessions that followed.

This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the National Research Council Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their participation in the review of this report:


Janet Campbell, University of New Hampshire, Durham

Elizabeth A. Chornesky, Independent Consultant, Carmel, California

William B. Gail, Microsoft Corporation, Boulder, Colorado

Jack Harrald, George Washington University, Washington, D.C.

Jerry Hatfield, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ames, Iowa

Charles Hutchinson, University of Arizona, Tucson

Anthony Janetos, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, College Park, Maryland

Jeffrey Ritchey, University of Washington, Seattle

William Smith, Hampton University, Hampton, Virginia


Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusions or recommendations nor did they see the final draft of the

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×

report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by Ruth DeFries, University of Maryland, College Park. Appointed by the NRC, she was responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoring committee and the institution.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×
Page R1
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×
Page R2
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×
Page R3
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×
Page R4
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×
Page R5
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×
Page R6
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×
Page R7
Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×
Page R8
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×
Page R9
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×
Page R10
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×
Page R11
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×
Page R12
Page xiii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×
Page R13
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×
Page R14
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×
Page R15
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2007. Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/11987.
×
Page R16
Next: Summary »
Assessment of the NASA Applied Sciences Program Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $47.00 Buy Ebook | $37.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF
  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!