Today, solid Earth studies often involve spaceborne techniques, ranging from multispectral imaging to space-geodetic methods. Over the past several decades, space-based observations of the Earth have contributed powerfully to fields such as plate tectonics, seismology, and volcanology, as well as to studies of the geodynamo, mantle convection, and continental tectonics. Such investigations also provide insights into managing natural resources, understanding natural hazards, and predicting global environmental change.
Satellites have revealed Earth’s precise shape and how it changes subtly with time and have measured the spatial and temporal changes in mass distribution through measurements of its gravity. Thanks to space geodesy, Earth scientists benefit from an International Earth Reference System that is accurate to better than 1 cm in all components, including the time-dependent position of the geocenter. Even more impressive is the millimeter level relative positioning that is achievable anywhere on the surface of the planet, or in orbit. We can thus measure the movement of tectonic plates in real time and elucidate higher complexities such as the distribution of deformation within plate boundary zones. The transformative nature of this technology is demonstrated by the fact that, a mere 50 years ago, a traveler might not know his/her position on Earth to better than 500 m, even after expending considerable effort in tedious reduction of geodetic observations. Yet, today, an automobilist, aviator, or sailor can determine the vehicle’s position to meter precision in real time, anywhere on the planet, using an inexpensive Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) satellites have contributed substantially to improving our knowledge of Earth’s gravity field. Laser Geodynamics Satellites (LAGEOS) and the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) measure Earth’s gravity field to model the regional-scale shape of Earth. The shape is irregular and changes over many different timescales (Figures 11.1 and 11.2). The early geoid was described only to the third harmonic degree, revealing the “pear-shaped” departure from the ellipsoid. As more detailed information on Earth’s gravity field was made available by LAGEOS and follow-on missions (combined with the expansion to higher harmonic degrees), its precise geoid and topography on a global scale have been made accessible.
Owing to the modern, highly precise, and homogeneous data from satellites such as CHallenging Mission Payload (CHAMP) and GRACE, scientists have been able to derive improved high-resolution global mean gravity field models (Reigber et al. 2003). These models are needed in numerous geodetic-geophysical applications, including the precise orbit determination of Earth satellites, determination of ocean surface currents from altimetry, or GPS leveling. Scientists resolve the gravity anomalies relative to the “idealized” ellipsoidal Earth with the use of these mean gravity models, which have become more sophisticated since the low-orbiting satellites CHAMP and GRACE were able to provide more accurate data. Consequently, these improved gravity models can solve for gravity anomalies 10 times more accurately than before these satellite data became available with direct implications for the aforementioned applications.
Satellite measurements of the geoid have provided crucial information to further the understanding of mantle convection. The main features visible in Figures 11.1 and 11.2 emerged in the early global estimates of spatial variations in Earth’s gravity field, which incorporated satellite tracking data (e.g., Gaposchkin and Lambeck 1971). Long-wavelength features such as the geoid highs over
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 92
11
Solid Earth
Today, solid Earth studies often involve spaceborne tech- the regional-scale shape of Earth. The shape is irregular
niques, ranging from multispectral imaging to space-geodetic and changes over many different timescales (Figures 11.1
methods. Over the past several decades, space-based observa- and 11.2). The early geoid was described only to the third
tions of the Earth have contributed powerfully to fields such harmonic degree, revealing the “pear-shaped” departure
as plate tectonics, seismology, and volcanology, as well as to from the ellipsoid. As more detailed information on Earth’s
studies of the geodynamo, mantle convection, and continen- gravity field was made available by LAGEOS and follow-on
tal tectonics. Such investigations also provide insights into missions (combined with the expansion to higher harmonic
managing natural resources, understanding natural hazards, degrees), its precise geoid and topography on a global scale
and predicting global environmental change. have been made accessible.
Satellites have revealed Earth’s precise shape and how Owing to the modern, highly precise, and homogeneous
it changes subtly with time and have measured the spatial data from satellites such as CHallenging Mission Payload
and temporal changes in mass distribution through measure- (CHAMP) and GRACE, scientists have been able to derive
ments of its gravity. Thanks to space geodesy, Earth scientists improved high-resolution global mean gravity field models
benefit from an International Earth Reference System that (Reigber et al. 2003). These models are needed in numerous
is accurate to better than 1 cm in all components, including geodetic-geophysical applications, including the precise
the time-dependent position of the geocenter. Even more orbit determination of Earth satellites, determination of
impressive is the millimeter level relative positioning that ocean surface currents from altimetry, or GPS leveling.
is achievable anywhere on the surface of the planet, or in Scientists resolve the gravity anomalies relative to the “ide-
orbit. We can thus measure the movement of tectonic plates alized” ellipsoidal Earth with the use of these mean gravity
in real time and elucidate higher complexities such as the models, which have become more sophisticated since the
distribution of deformation within plate boundary zones. low-orbiting satellites CHAMP and GRACE were able to
The transformative nature of this technology is demonstrated provide more accurate data. Consequently, these improved
by the fact that, a mere 50 years ago, a traveler might not gravity models can solve for gravity anomalies 10 times
know his/her position on Earth to better than 500 m, even more accurately than before these satellite data became
after expending considerable effort in tedious reduction of available with direct implications for the aforementioned
geodetic observations. Yet, today, an automobilist, aviator, or applications.
sailor can determine the vehicle’s position to meter precision
in real time, anywhere on the planet, using an inexpensive
STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS OF
Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver.
EARTH’S DEEP INTERIOR
Satellite measurements of the geoid have provided
gEODESY
crucial information to further the understanding of mantle
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) convection. The main features visible in Figures 11.1
satellites have contributed substantially to improving our and 11.2 emerged in the early global estimates of spatial
knowledge of Earth’s gravity field. Laser Geodynamics variations in Earth’s gravity field, which incorporated satel-
Satellites (LAGEOS) and the Gravity Recovery and Climate lite tracking data (e.g., Gaposchkin and Lambeck 1971).
Experiment (GRACE) measure Earth’s gravity field to model Long-wavelength features such as the geoid highs over
OCR for page 92
SOLID EARTH
Meters
FIGURE 11.1 View of Earth’s geoid from the GRACE mission yields deep structures. Using an ellipsoid to approximate the bulk of the
Earth’s shape and departures from the ellipsoid are represented by the geoid elevation above or below the ellipsoid. The geoid can be as low as
106 m (350 f) below the ellipsoid or as high as 85 m (280 f) above. SOURCE: NASA/Deutsches Zentrum für Luft-und Raumfahrt (DLR).
11-1
FIGURE 11.2 Earth’s gravity anomaly from the GRACE mission yields smaller-scale structures. Standard gravity is defined as the value
of gravity for a perfectly smooth “idealized” Earth, and the gravity anomaly (expressed in units of milliGals [mGal]) is a measure of how
actual gravity deviates from this standard. SOURCE: NASA/DLR.
OCR for page 92
EARTH OBSERVATIONS FROM SPACE: THE FIRST 50 YEARS OF SCIENTIFIC ACHIEVEMENTS
regions of plate convergence (New Zealand–New Guinea–
Japan–Kamchatka–Aleutians and western South America)
BOX 11.1
indicate mass variations associated with mantle convection
Earth Reference Frame
and the variation of density and strength in Earth’s interior.
For example, Hager (1984) demonstrated that these geoid
Few scientific accomplishments are as “transfor-
highs over subduction zones require a substantial increase
mative” as the advances in space geodesy over the
in viscosity with depth between the upper mantle and lower
past five decades, particularly with the ubiquitous
mantle, resulting in an impediment to convective mass
introduction of GPS devices. This breakthrough
transport across the boundary between these two layers. The
not only has transformed the field of geodesy but
gravity low over Hudson Bay (Figure 11.2) is due, in part, to
also provides vital information for studying global
a remaining depression in the surface caused by the weight
sea-level change, earthquakes, and volcanoes, as
of the great Laurentide ice sheet that melted at the end of the
well as providing precise position information for all
last ice age. The estimate that almost half of this gravity low
Earth science research.
is the result of ongoing post-glacial rebound again requires a
At the time of the International Geophysical
substantial increase in the viscosity of the mantle with depth,
Year, the geolocation of most points at the surface
otherwise the surface depression would have relaxed more
of the Earth entailed errors that reached hundreds
by now (Simons and Hager 1997). The recent observation by
of meters in remote areas, even after much effort.
GRACE of the rate at which this gravity low is decreasing in
Today, scientists rely on an International Earth
amplitude confirms that almost half of this gravity low is the
Reference Frame from which geographical posi-
remnant of the former ice sheet (Tamisiea et al. 2007).
tions can be accurately described relative to the
geocenter, in three-dimensional Cartesian coordi-
THE gLOBAL POSITIONINg SYSTEM nates to centimeter accuracy or better—a 2 to 3
o
rders-of-magnitude improvement compared to 50
NASA missions provided major contributions to the
years ago. This is true anywhere, on an active planet
development of the global reference frame through the GPS,
where every piece of real estate moves relative to
Satellite Laser Ranging, and Very Long Baseline Interferom-
every other. Geodesy observations from space have
etry technology. GPS and Interferometric synthetic aperture
enabled modern measurements of Earth’s rotation.
radar (InSAR) methods have provided precise measure-
The change in position of the rotation axis (the
ments of Earth’s shape and surface positioning (Box 11.1),
poles) is determined daily to centimeter accuracy,
thus providing detailed local and global topographic and
and changes in the length of a day are determined
deformation information. Current InSAR satellites include
to millisecond accuracy within a few hours. Improve-
the European Remote Sensing Satellite (ERS), the European
ments in GPS measurements over the past few
Environmental Satellite (ENVISAT), the Japanese Advanced
decades have enabled instantaneous geodetic posi-
Land Observation Satellite (ALOS), and the Canadian
tioning (Genrich and Bock 2006)—a real-time GPS.
Radarsat program. These satellites and the constellation of
GPS receivers are now available inexpensively to
GPS satellites track current motions of Earth’s surface at
consumers, who are rapidly becoming accustomed
centimeter precision over time and reveal many geophysical
to GPS navigation on the road, on the water, and
processes occurring on the surface and at depth, where they
in the air without realizing the enormous body of
are generally inaccessible to surface observation. Ironically,
science behind this technological achievement:
the use of gravity and deformation data obtained from space
accurate ephemerides of the satellites, very stable
has greatly improved our understanding of structure and
clocks, well-calibrated atmospheric corrections, and
change deep within the Earth (see below).
even relativistic corrections.
PLATE TECTONICS, TOPOgRAPHY, SEISMOLOgY,
AND VOLCANOLOgY
The theory of plate tectonics was driven largely by
observations in the 1950s from ocean vessels mapping and contemporary velocities. For example, Iaffaldano et al.
the magnetic field and the seafloor shape, which can now (2006) found that the Nazca Plate moves at a velocity of
be obtained more easily from satellite observations (Fig- 6.9 cm per year, compared to its geologic velocity of 10.1 cm
ure 11.3). Several decades later satellite observations enabled per year 10 million years ago. Geologic timescale velocities
a scientific revolution in advancing the theory of plate typically disagree with present rates, with implications for
tectonics by providing highly detailed, quantifiable measure- crust-mantle interaction. Factors such as friction or time-
ments of Earth’s surface. GPS has enabled measurement dependent processes can be modeled if we understand how
of plate positioning and velocities, thus resolving geologic the rates vary with time.
OCR for page 92
5
SOLID EARTH
FIGURE 11.3 Map of seafloor topography derived from gravity measurements from satellite tracking and radar altimetry. SOURCE: Re-
printed with permission of Dave Sandwell, University of California, San Diego.
11-3
Gravity and altimetry measurements from space have (2002) inferred stress change as a result of the Hector Mine
also led to discoveries in topography. The Shuttle Radar earthquake and the resulting distribution of the stress in the
Topography Mission (SRTM) employed InSAR topography upper crust suggests areas likely for further activity.
to produce the first (and only) fine-resolution, worldwide, Other processes are occurring every day in the solid
consistent model of elevation. This discovery has mapped Earth, many of which escape our knowledge because they
the world at 30-m posting, 10-m elevation accuracy; 90-m occur at a rate slow enough not to radiate seismic energy
data are now openly available for Earth. Down-looking that can be detected with our present seismographs. Yet
radar altimeters measuring ocean heights, which follow the these mechanisms for the transfer of energy through the
geoid, yield sea-surface topography over the entire ocean at upper crust need to be observed and measured if we are to
a data density unobtainable on a global scale from shipboard be able to explain many natural hazards. For example, GPS
measurements. Applications of detailed gravity information has enabled the discovery of aseismic (“slow”) earthquakes
include oil exploration and the location of undersea volca- occurring in many subduction zones around the Earth and
noes (Smith and Sandwell 2003). adding stress to subduction faults (Figure 11.5). The GPS
Gravity and topography anomalies relate to large-scale time series for the Cascadia subduction zone shows the result
seismic risk and the geophysics of subduction zone bound- of continual aseismic earthquakes (Melbourne and Webb
aries (Song and Simons 2003). Finer-scale risk assessments 2003). Aseismic earthquakes may either dissipate or increase
follow from high-resolution observations of deformation stress, affecting risk probabilities. Unknown until 5 years
along active faults, which reveal strain accumulations and ago, aseismic earthquakes are a recent discovery dependent
can indicate stress transfer associated with seismic activ- on satellite observations.
ity. Therefore, the scientific community took notice after Inverse methods and the density of InSAR measure-
an InSAR observation of the Landers earthquake of 1992, ments permit a solution for fault slip at depth, giving a view
creating the first-ever detailed image of an earthquake and its of what is occurring underground as illustrated by images
effect on the crust (Massonnet et al. 1993; Figure 11.4). of the Hector Mine earthquake (see Zebker et al. 2000 and
Measuring surface displacement is now an important Figure 11.6). Such analyses are now commonplace over
ingredient in seismic risk analysis. For example, Fialko et al. many terrains.
OCR for page 92
EARTH OBSERVATIONS FROM SPACE: THE FIRST 50 YEARS OF SCIENTIFIC ACHIEVEMENTS
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
1996 2005
A Yreka, CA (YBHB) 100
GPS longitude (mm)
80
tremor (hr/week)
5 60
0 40
20
-5
B
5 Newport, OR (NEWP)
?
? ?
GPS longitude (mm)
0
-5
C
5 Alberthead BC (ALBH)
0
-5
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004
1996 2005
11-5
FIGURE 11.5 GPS time series from Yreka, CA (YBHB), Newport,
OR (NEWP), and Alberthead, BC (ALBH), and seismic tremor his-
togram from Yreka. (A) Blue points are daily GPS station positions
in mm of the longitudinal component of station YBHB. Solid red
line is a plot of the hours of tremor per week at seismic station YBH.
Note the similarity of shape displayed by ALBH (C) and YBHB.
The correlation between GPS offsets and increased tremor activity
indicates that slow faulting occurs beneath Northern California.
(B) Purple points represent daily solutions of station position for
the longitudinal component of GPS station NEWP from Newport,
Oregon. Note the similarity of NEWP offsets (dashed black lines)
FIGURE 11.4 Cover of the journal Nature showing the first-ever
to those at ALBH. The lack of seismic and continuous GPS stations
image of an earthquake. This interferogram was produced by com-
11-4 near NEWP precludes the definitive identification of slow earth-
bining the pair of ERS-1 SAR images taken before and after the
quakes here at the present time. (C) Green points represent daily
Landers earthquake of June 28, 1992. Each cycle of colored shading
one column position solutions of the longitudinal component of ALBH. Note
represents a range difference of 28 mm between the before and after
the characteristic sawtooth reset shape of the time series due to slow
images, used to detect changes in the position of the ground surface.
faulting events. Solid black lines denote times of known slow earth-
SOURCE: Massonnet et al. (1993). Reprinted with permission from
quakes at ALBH. SOURCE: Szeliga et al. (2004). Reproduced with
Macmillan Publishers Ltd., copyright 1993.
permission from American Geophysical Union, copyright 2004.
Many processes on Earth leave strong signals in the defor- tion (Figure 11.7; e.g., Las Vegas Valley, NV, 1992-1997;
mation of the surface resulting from movements or changes in Amelung et al. 1999).
pressure far beneath the surface. For example, volcanoes cause Water resource managers will be able to model aquifer
surface deformation readily observed from satellites. Multiple storage extent (Hoffmann et al. 2003) and begin to map
deformation processes occur simultaneously during a volcanic the direction and volume of water migrating through the
eruption, prompting the need for volcanic mechanical model- aquifer system that feeds our cities and farms (see Chap-
ing (Jonsson et al. 2005) in addition to simple mapping of the ter 6). As described in Chapter 7, gravity measurements
deformation signature. Detailed observations of the patterns have also been applied to studying continental ice sheets.
of surficial change allow us to discriminate between many The observed changes in ice flow velocity of glaciers have
candidate effects and help us better understand the evolution revolutionized the thinking in how climate change affects
and predictability of volcanoes. the ice sheet mass balance. Measurements of the ice sheet
Further applications of spaceborne geodesy follow from mass balance and maps of ice flow velocity provided by
measurement of anthropogenic surface change. With impli- satellites (Rignot 2001) are making important contributions
cations for natural resource management and natural hazard to improved accuracy in forecasting of sea-level rise. These
response, satellites measure subsidence from petroleum estimates require combining the knowledge gained in solid-
extraction (e.g., Lost Hills, CA; Hooper 2005), landslides Earth geophysics and hydrology, with profound implications
appearing clearly in InSAR maps (e.g., Berkeley Hills, CA; for accurately modeling and predicting the consequences of
Hilley et al. 2004), and subsidence from groundwater extrac- climate change.
OCR for page 92
SOLID EARTH
FIGURE 11.6 Hector Mine earthquake, view of fault slip at depth. SOURCE: Zebker et al. (2000). Reproduced with permission from
American Geophysical Union, copyright 2000.
FIGURE 11.7 Subsidence from groundwater extraction in the Las Vegas Valley, 1992-1997. SOURCE: Amelung et al. (1999). Reprinted
with permission from the Geological Society of America, copyright 1999.