National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$46.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Cancer Care for the Whole Patient: Meeting Psychosocial Health Needs (2008)
Board on Health Care Services (HCS)

Citation Manager

. "8 A Research Agenda." Cancer Care for the Whole Patient: Meeting Psychosocial Health Needs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2008.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
341
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Cancer Care for the Whole Patient: Meeting Psychosocial Health Needs

Development Collaborative on Psychosocial Care during Chronic Medical Illness.

  • Review board exams for oncologists and primary care providers to identify questions relevant to psychosocial care.

  • Review accreditation standards for educational programs used to train health care personnel to identify content requirements relevant to psychosocial care.

  • Review certification requirements for clinicians to identify those requirements relevant to psychosocial care.

  • Examine the funding portfolios of NIH, CMS, AHRQ, and other public and private sponsors of quality-of-care research to quantify the funding of initiatives aimed at assessing the incorporation of workforce competencies into education, training, and clinical practice and their impact on achieving the standard for psychosocial care.

For the committee’s recommendation on standardized nomenclature and research priorities (see Chapter 3 and this chapter, respectively), DHHS could

  • Report on NIH/AHRQ actions to develop a taxonomy and nomenclature for psychosocial health services.

  • Examine the funding portfolios of public and private research sponsors to assess whether funding priorities included the recommended areas.

REFERENCES

Andrykowski, M. A., and S. L. Manne. 2006. Are psychological interventions effective and accepted by cancer patients? I. Standards and levels of evidence. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 32(2):93–97.

Antoni, M. H., S. K. Lutgendorf, S. W. Cole, F. S. Dhabhar, S. E. Sephton, P. G. McDonald, M. Stefanek, and A. K. Sood. 2006. The influence of bio-behavioral factors on tumor biology: Pathways and mechanisms. Nature Reviews. Cancer 6(3):240–248.

Bodenheimer, T., K. Lorig, H. Holman, and K. Grumbach. 2002. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. Journal of the American Medical Association 288(19): 2469–2475.

Chodosh, J., S. C. Morton, W. Mojica, M. Maglione, M. J. Suttorp, L. Hilton, S. Rhodes, and P. Shekelle. 2005. Meta-analysis: Chronic disease self-management programs for older adults. Annals of Internal Medicine 143(6):427–438.

Cohen, S. 2004. Social relationships and health. American Psychologist 59(8):676–684.

Glasgow, R. E., D. J. Toobert, and C. D. Gillette. 2001. Psychosocial barriers to diabetes self-management and quality of life. Diabetes Spectrum 14(1):33–41.

Helgeson, V. S. 2005. Recent advances in psychosocial oncology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 73(2):268–271.

Page
341