Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 85
e Presentations and committee meetings commiTTee meeTiNG commiTTee sUBGroUP meeTiNG WashiNGToN, d.c. WashiNGToN, d.c. aUGUsT 24-25, 2006 ocToBer 17, 2006 Remarks About Committee’s Study Q&A Richard Chandler, Office of Management and budget Tom Miller, U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy Overview Dominion Energy R. Shane Johnson, U.S. Department of Energy Eugene Grecheck, Dominion Energy, Inc. Benefits Analysis Activities Drivers and Challenges for New Nuclear Development: One Perspective John Stamos, U.S. Department of Energy Joe Turnage, Constellation Energy/UniStar Nuclear Power 2010 NuStart Energy Rebecca Smith-Keern, U.S. Department of Energy Marilyn Kray, Exelon/NuStart Generation IV Nuclear Power Systems Q&A Rebecca Smith-Keern, U.S. Department of Energy Dale Klein (by phone), U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Hydrogen Initiative DOE’s Light Water Reactor R&D Program: An Industry Rebecca Smith-Keern, U.S. Department of Energy Perspective Global Nuclear Energy Partnership Gary Vine, Electric Power Research Institute Timothy A. Frazier, U.S. Department of Energy Q&A Idaho Facilities Management Marin Fertel, Nuclear Energy Institute Owen Lowe, U.S. Department of Energy commiTTee meeTiNG DOE’s Nuclear R&D Program: An Industry Perspective WashiNGToN, d.c. Dae Modeen, Electric Power Research Institute NoVemBer 8-9, 2006 Technology Development Considerations The Global Nuclear Energy Partnership Update Albert Machiels, Electric Power Research Institute Paul Lisowski, U.S. Department of Energy 

OCR for page 85
 REVIEW OF DOE’S NUCLEAR ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Idaho National Laboratory Nuclear Energy Research Q&A Dae Hill, Deputy Laboratory Director of Science & Marin Fertel, Nuclear Energy Institute Technology Trip Report on INL Site Visit, November 2006 Basic Energy Sciences Research Relevant to Advanced Dae Morrison (committee member) Nuclear Energy Systems Q&A on DOE/NE Program John C. Miller, U.S. Department of Energy Dennis Spurgeon, U.S. Department of Energy New Units: ESBWR and ABWR Rick Kingston, GE commiTTee meeTiNG WashiNGToN, d.c. Q&A march 8-9, 2007 Ray Ganthner, AREVA Office of Nuclear Energy, Budget and Planning Overview Q&A Susan L. Harlow, U.S. Department of Energy George Dais, Westinghouse Prospective Benefits Methodology Q&A bob Fri, Committee Chair Jim Reinsch, bechtel Separations Technology The Global Nuclear Energy Partnership Technology Dem- Jim bresee, U.S. Department of Energy onstration Program NP 2010 Kathryn McCarthy, Idaho National Laboratory Rebecca Smith-Keern (by telephone), U.S. Department of Energy siTe VisiT To idaho NaTioNal laBoraTorY NoVemBer 28-29, 2006 GNEP Jim bresee, U.S. Department of Energy commiTTee meeTiNG WashiNGToN, d.c. closed commiTTee meeTiNG JaNUarY 9, 2007 WashiNGToN, d.c. Alternatives to GNEP maY 30-31, 2007 John Deutch, Massachusetts Institute of Technology