| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2009. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 48
Options to Ensure the Climate Record from the NPOESS and GOES-R Spacecraft: A Workshop Report
Appendix B
Workshop Agenda
JUNE 19, 2007
Morning Plenary Session
Context Setting
Present Status of NPOESS and GOES-R
In-depth Discussion of Phase 2 Government Study
7:50 a.m.
Welcome
8:00
Teleconference with Mary Kicza and Mike Freilich (CEOS Meeting in Frascati)
8:30
Background and Overview for the Workshop—Organizing Panel Chair Antonio Busalacchi, University of Maryland
9:15
Review of the NASA-NOAA OSTP Re-manifest Phase 2 Study
Sensor and Measurement Recovery Options—B. Cramer, NASA Headquarters CDR Science Support—J. Privette, NOAA NCDC
Discussion
12:00 p.m.
Working Lunch: Overview of Relevant Decadal Survey Recommendations—Berrien Moore, University of New Hampshire
OCR for page 49
Options to Ensure the Climate Record from the NPOESS and GOES-R Spacecraft: A Workshop Report
1:30
Breakouts (focus on ECVs)
Charge to the day 1 breakout groups: Each of the afternoon working groups will provide a short report that will be presented the following day in plenary session.
What are the priority space-based ECVs/climate data records under consideration by this breakout?
What subset of the above will be accommodated by the coordinated NASA-NOAA strategy as presented in the phase II NASA-NOAA remanifest study?
Are there alternative approaches that are not explored in the NASA-NOAA study (e.g., free flyers, alternative platforms, leveraging international partners)?
Assess the risks and benefits of these various options.
Document your results in the template that will be distributed at the meeting.
Some of the issues to be considered in the above:
History/limitations of extant database and measurement capabilities, including calibration limitations and needs
How well alternative, indirect measurements or models can compensate for the lack of direct observations
Issues for interpreting the climate record—simultaneity of observations in time and space of related geophysical variables; spatial, altitudinal, and temporal resolution for each of the sensors, e.g., free flyers
Long-term strategy for ensuring climate records and broader climate services vision—overlap, calibration, redundant measurements/validation, data processing/reprocessing, algorithm development/evolution, archiving, science teams, grants/funding programs to support science teams
Breakout Session 1—Consideration of NPOESS and GOES-R Priority Measurements for ECVs/Climate Data Records Related to Observations of the Atmosphere
Tom Vonder Haar, Colorado State University; John Bates, NCDC
Rapporteur: Mark Schoeberl, GSFC
Breakout Session 2—Consideration of NPOESS and GOES-R Priority Measurements for ECVs/Climate Data Records Related to Observations of the Oceans
Bob Weller, invited; Jeff Privette, NCDC
Rapporteur: Ralph Milliff, NWRA
Breakout Session 3—Consideration of NPOESS and GOES-R Priority Measurements for ECVs/Climate Data Records Related to Observations of the Land
Berrien Moore, University of New Hampshire; Marc Imhoff, GSFC
Rapporteur: Compton Tucker, CCSP
4:30
Workshop Adjourns for Day
OCR for page 50
Options to Ensure the Climate Record from the NPOESS and GOES-R Spacecraft: A Workshop Report
JUNE 20, 2007
8:30 a.m.
Report out of Day 1 Breakouts
40 minute sessions (20 presentation/20 discussion) on status and/or potential tradespace for NPOESS and GOES-R sensors related to:
9:30
Radiation Sensors and Climate—Stan Schneider, NPOESS IPO
10:10
Visible/IR Sensors Related to Climate—Steve Mango, NPOESS IPO
11:00
Microwave Sensors and Climate—Karen St. Germain, NOAA NESDIS
11:40
GOES-R/HES—Mark Mulholland, NOAA NESDIS
12:30 p.m.
Working Lunch—Jim Gleason, GSFC; Marc Imhoff, GSFC
Discussion on the role of instruments on NPP and EOS (extended phase operations) in gap filling strategies
1:30
Breakouts (focus on sensors)
Session 1: Radiation Sensors
Judith Lean, NRL; Bruce Wielicki, LaRC
Rapporteur: Jim Coakley, Oregon State University
Total Solar Irradiance Sensor—Tom Woods, LASP
Earth Radiation Budget Sensor—Bruce Wielicki, LaRC
Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite Limb Subsystem—Mark Schoeberl, GSFC
Discussion
Session 2: Visible and Infrared Imagers-Sounders
Graeme Stephens, Colorado State University; Paul Menzel, University of Wisconsin
Rapporteur: Stacey Boland, JPL
MODIS and VIIRS—Carl Schueler, Raytheon SBRC (retired)
APS and APS-MODIS/VIIRS Synergy—Brian Cairns, GISS
AIRS/IASI/CrIS-ATMS Climate Considerations—Tom Pagano, Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Discussion
Atmospheric Climate Variables and CDRs—Paul Menzel, University of Wisconsin
Land Climate Variables and CDRs—Compton Tucker, CCSP
Ocean Climate Variables and CDRs—Chuck McLain, GSFC; Craig Donlon, U.K. Met Office
OCR for page 51
Options to Ensure the Climate Record from the NPOESS and GOES-R Spacecraft: A Workshop Report
Session 3: Microwave Sensors
Frank Wentz, RSS; Dudley Chelton, Oregon State University
Rapporteur: Judith Curry, Georgia Tech
CMIS/MIS—Chelle Gentemann, RSS
ALT—Lee-Lueng Fu, Jet Propulsion Laboratory
QuikScat Follow-on and XOVWM/Other Options—Zorana Jelenak, NOAA/NESDIS
Discussion
Session 4: GOES-R and HES
Chris Velden, University of Wisconsin; Bill Smith, Hampton University
Rapporteur: Phil Ardanuy, Raytheon
GOES-R and Its Role in Climate Research—Bill Smith, Hampton University
Options to Restore HES Capabilities—Hank Revercomb, University of Wisconsin; David Crain, ITT
Critique of the NOAA Analysis of Alternatives Document—Bob Atlas, NOAA
GIFTS and Its Potential Role in a Mitigation Strategy—Bob Atlas, NOAA
Science Validation Using Observation System Simulated Experiment—Bob Atlas, NOAA
Discussion
4:30
Workshop Adjourns for Day
JUNE 21, 2007
Plenary Session
8:00 a.m.
Report out of Day 2 Panels
9:00
International Dimensions of a Mitigation Strategy—Videoconference, Geneva
(WMO Workshop, “Redesign and Optimization of the Space-Based Global Observing System”), Frascati, Italy (CEOS meeting), and ECMWF (Tony Hollingsworth)
Introduction of the Panel—Jim Purdom
Context of the NRC Panel on Options—Antonio Busalacchi
GOES-R Hyperspectral Measurements for Climate—Paul Menzel/Jim Purdom
CEOS Strategy on Climate Observations from Space—Barbara Ryan
WMO Workshop on Optimization—Don Hinsman
GMES and Climate Modeling—Tony Hollingsworth
Closing Remarks—Jim Purdom
Panel Questions and Discussion
Closing Remarks—Jim Purdom and Antonio Busalacchi
OCR for page 52
Options to Ensure the Climate Record from the NPOESS and GOES-R Spacecraft: A Workshop Report
12:15 p.m.
Working Lunch
1:30
Breakouts
Panel to Explore Particular Mitigation Options in Need of Further Analysis
Panel on Issues Related to CDR Generation
Review Requirements for CDRs (contrast with data retrievals for weather) and Assess Adequacy of Current, Post-Nunn-McCurdy Plans for:
Pre-launch Instrument Characterization and On-orbit Calibration/Validation
Overlap and Replenishment Requirements
Data Storage, Archiving, Distribution, and Reprocessing
Panel-of-Panels Synthesis (What’s been lost; what can be recovered; and, per NASA request, interplay with decadal survey recommendations)
4:00
Reconvene in Plenary Session
5:30
Workshop Adjourns