National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$30.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Water Implications of Biofuels Production in the United States (2008)
Water Science and Technology Board (WSTB)

Citation Manager

. "2 Crop Water Availability and Use." Water Implications of Biofuels Production in the United States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2008.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
20
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Water Implications of Biofuels Production in the United States

FIGURE 2-1 Regional irrigation water application for various crops for six regions of the United States. Irrigation application is normalized by area, and is in feet.

SOURCE: N.Gollehon, U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Economic Research Service (ERS), written commun., July 12, 2007. Based on data from USDA Census of Agriculture.

different type of biomass will result in increased water use in some cases, in other cases a decrease.

As an example, in much of the country, the crop substitution is from soy to corn. The regional effects of this can be seen in Figure 2-1. Corn generally uses less water than soybeans and cotton in the Pacific and Mountain regions. The reverse is true in the Northern and Southern Plains, and the crops use about the same amount of water in the North Central and Eastern regions. Changes in agricultural water use would generally parallel these trends. Another example is in Northern Texas, where annual evapotranspiration (ET) rates per year for alfalfa, corn, cotton, and sorghum are estimated to be about 1,600, 760, 640, and 580 mm (63, 30, 25, and 23 inches), respectively. Therefore, regional water loss to ET will likely decrease if

Page
20