Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PREPUB + PDF
your price: $65.50
add to cart

PREPUB
list:$55.95
Web:$50.36
add to cart

HARDBACK
list:$48.95
Web:$44.06
add to cart

PDF BOOK PREPUB
your price: $43.00
add to cart

PDF CHAPTER PREPUB
your price: $1.30
select

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Gender Differences at Critical Transitions in the Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty (2009)
Committee on Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine (CWSEM)
 Committee on National Statistics (CNSTAT)

Page
311
bottomleft bottomright
  E-mail
 Facebook
 Digg
 Stumble
 Twitter
More
Page
311
Front Matter (R1-R16)
SUMMARY (1-12)
1INTRODUCTION (13-26)
2 STATUS OF WOMEN IN ACADEMIC SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING IN 2004 AND 2005 (27-34)
3 Gender Differences in Academic Hiring (35-64)
4 Professional Activities, Institutional Resources, Climate, and Outcomes (65-106)
5 Gender Differences in Tenure and Promotion (107-140)
6 KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (141-154)
Bibliography (155-190)
Appendix 1-1 Committee on Gender Differences in Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty (191-196)
Appendix 1-2 List of Research I institutions (197-197)
Appendix 1-3 Committee on Gender Differences in Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty (198-199)
Appendix 1-4The Surveys (200-206)
Appendix 1-5 Survey Instruments (207-232)
Appendix 1-6 Departments in Survey (233-259)
Appendix 2-1 Review of Literature and Relevant Research (260-274)
APPENDIX 2-2 PREVIOUS RESEARCH ON FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO GENDER DIFFERENCES AMONG FACULTY (275-281)
Appendix 3-1 Review of the Literature and Research on Factors Associated with a Higher Proportion of Female Applicants (282-289)
Appendix 3-2 Estimated adjusted mean effects and differences for the probability that there are no female applicants (290-290)
Appendix 3-3 Estimated adjusted mean effects and differences based on the modeled probability of the percentage of applicants that are female (291-292)
Appendix 3-4 Estimated adjusted mean effects and differences based on the modeled probability of at least one female candidate interviewed (293-294)
Appendix 3-5 Doctoral degrees awarded by all doctoral-granting institutions, by field, gender, and year. (295-295)
Appendix 3-6 Doctoral Degrees Awarded by discipline and gender for Research I institutions, 1999-2003 (296-296)
Appendix 3-7 (297-300)
Appendix 3-8 Main Considerations for taking a position by number of respondents saying "Yes" (301-301)
Appendix 4-1 Distribution of Undergraduate Course Load for Faculty by Gender and Discipline (302-303)
Appendix 4-2 (304-304)
Appendix 4-3 (305-305)
Appendix 4-4 (306-306)
Appendix 4-5 (307-307)
Appendix 4-6 Distribution of Number of Graduate Thesis or Honors Committees for Research I Tenure and Tenure-Track Faculty (308-308)
Appendix 4-7 Percentage of Time Spent in Administration or Committee Work on Campus and Service to the Profession Outside the University for Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty at Research I Institutions (309-309)
Appendix 4-8 Distribution of Number of Service Committees for Research I Tenure and Tenure-Track Faculty (310-310)
Appendix 4-9 Mean Salary by Gender and Professorial Rank for Tenure and Tenure-Track Faculty in Research I Institutions (311-311)
Appendix 4-10 Percent of Tenured and Tenure Track Faculty in Research I Institutions Receiving Summer Support (312-312)
Appendix 4-11 Percent of Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty in Research I Institutions Receiving Travel Funds (313-313)
Appendix 4-12 (314-314)
Appendix 4-13 (315-315)
Appendix 4-14 (316-316)
Appendix 4-15 (317-317)
Appendix 4-16 (318-318)
Appendix 4-17 (319-319)
Appendix 4-18 (320-320)
Appendix 4-19 (321-321)
Appendix 4-20a (322-322)
Appendix 4-20b (323-323)
Appendix 4-21 (324-324)
Appendix 4-22 (325-325)
Appendix 4-23 (326-326)
Appendix 4-24 (327-327)
Appendix 5-1 (328-329)
Appendix 5-2 (330-330)
Appendix 5-3 (331-331)
Appendix 5-4 (332-332)
Appendix 5-5 (333-333)
Appendix 5-6 (334-334)
Appendix 5-7 (335-335)
BIBLIOGRAPHY (336-373)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 311
APPENDIXES 311 Appendix 4-9 Mean Salary by Gender and Professorial Rank for Tenure and Tenure-Track Faculty in Research I Institutions Mean Salary by Gender and Rank DISCIPLINE Rank Mean (1000s) Mean (1000s) Men Women Biology 1 101.9 (34) 93.5 (34) Chemistry 1 112.9 (43) 101.7 (28) Mathematics 1 106.5 (40) 101.1 (26) Electrical Engineering 1 107.9 (27) 110. 2 (33) Physics 1 110.0 (48) 93.7 (33) Civil Engineering 1 115.0 (24) 102.5 (26) Biology 2 72.8 (31) 68.2 (48) Chemistry 2 72.9 (28) 72.7 (36) Mathematics 2 68.1 (17) 69.0 (29) Electrical Engineering 2 83.8 (25) 93.5 (34) Physics 2 73.2 (31) 74.8 (34) Civil Engineering 2 81.8 (30) 81.3 (42) Biology 3 62.2 (35) 59.5 (26) Chemistry 3 59.6 (33) 62.9 (30) Mathematics 3 61.1 (22) 58.4 (32) Electrical Engineering 3 76.6 (43) 76.2 (30) Physics 3 65.1 (26) 65.0 (44) Civil Engineering 3 71.1 (25) 68.9 (42) Source: Survey of Faculty Carried Out By the Committee on Gender Differences in Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty. Rank is denoted as full (1), associate (2), or assistant (3)professor. Salaries are expressed as number of thousands of dollars with number of respondents in parentheses. For example, 34 men at the full professor rank in biology responded that they earn an average of $101,900 per year. Note: Of 1404 full-time faculty members who responded, only 1,179 included salary data. Note: The salaries expressed are 9-month salaries. Some clearly high outliers were removed. 20% of the respondents replied back with salaries below $100 for nine months. Since it was likely that these values were actually in the thousands, these numbers were multiplied by 1,000 for the final value rather than omitting the information. PREPUBLICATION COPY