Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PREPUB + PDF
your price: $65.50
add to cart

PREPUB
list:$55.95
Web:$50.36
add to cart

HARDBACK
list:$48.95
Web:$44.06
add to cart

PDF BOOK PREPUB
your price: $43.00
add to cart

PDF CHAPTER PREPUB
your price: $1.30
select

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Gender Differences at Critical Transitions in the Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty (2009)
Committee on Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine (CWSEM)
 Committee on National Statistics (CNSTAT)

Page
330
bottomleft bottomright
  E-mail
 Facebook
 Digg
 Stumble
 Twitter
More
Page
330
Front Matter (R1-R16)
SUMMARY (1-12)
1INTRODUCTION (13-26)
2 STATUS OF WOMEN IN ACADEMIC SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING IN 2004 AND 2005 (27-34)
3 Gender Differences in Academic Hiring (35-64)
4 Professional Activities, Institutional Resources, Climate, and Outcomes (65-106)
5 Gender Differences in Tenure and Promotion (107-140)
6 KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (141-154)
Bibliography (155-190)
Appendix 1-1 Committee on Gender Differences in Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty (191-196)
Appendix 1-2 List of Research I institutions (197-197)
Appendix 1-3 Committee on Gender Differences in Careers of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Faculty (198-199)
Appendix 1-4The Surveys (200-206)
Appendix 1-5 Survey Instruments (207-232)
Appendix 1-6 Departments in Survey (233-259)
Appendix 2-1 Review of Literature and Relevant Research (260-274)
APPENDIX 2-2 PREVIOUS RESEARCH ON FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO GENDER DIFFERENCES AMONG FACULTY (275-281)
Appendix 3-1 Review of the Literature and Research on Factors Associated with a Higher Proportion of Female Applicants (282-289)
Appendix 3-2 Estimated adjusted mean effects and differences for the probability that there are no female applicants (290-290)
Appendix 3-3 Estimated adjusted mean effects and differences based on the modeled probability of the percentage of applicants that are female (291-292)
Appendix 3-4 Estimated adjusted mean effects and differences based on the modeled probability of at least one female candidate interviewed (293-294)
Appendix 3-5 Doctoral degrees awarded by all doctoral-granting institutions, by field, gender, and year. (295-295)
Appendix 3-6 Doctoral Degrees Awarded by discipline and gender for Research I institutions, 1999-2003 (296-296)
Appendix 3-7 (297-300)
Appendix 3-8 Main Considerations for taking a position by number of respondents saying "Yes" (301-301)
Appendix 4-1 Distribution of Undergraduate Course Load for Faculty by Gender and Discipline (302-303)
Appendix 4-2 (304-304)
Appendix 4-3 (305-305)
Appendix 4-4 (306-306)
Appendix 4-5 (307-307)
Appendix 4-6 Distribution of Number of Graduate Thesis or Honors Committees for Research I Tenure and Tenure-Track Faculty (308-308)
Appendix 4-7 Percentage of Time Spent in Administration or Committee Work on Campus and Service to the Profession Outside the University for Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty at Research I Institutions (309-309)
Appendix 4-8 Distribution of Number of Service Committees for Research I Tenure and Tenure-Track Faculty (310-310)
Appendix 4-9 Mean Salary by Gender and Professorial Rank for Tenure and Tenure-Track Faculty in Research I Institutions (311-311)
Appendix 4-10 Percent of Tenured and Tenure Track Faculty in Research I Institutions Receiving Summer Support (312-312)
Appendix 4-11 Percent of Tenured and Tenure-Track Faculty in Research I Institutions Receiving Travel Funds (313-313)
Appendix 4-12 (314-314)
Appendix 4-13 (315-315)
Appendix 4-14 (316-316)
Appendix 4-15 (317-317)
Appendix 4-16 (318-318)
Appendix 4-17 (319-319)
Appendix 4-18 (320-320)
Appendix 4-19 (321-321)
Appendix 4-20a (322-322)
Appendix 4-20b (323-323)
Appendix 4-21 (324-324)
Appendix 4-22 (325-325)
Appendix 4-23 (326-326)
Appendix 4-24 (327-327)
Appendix 5-1 (328-329)
Appendix 5-2 (330-330)
Appendix 5-3 (331-331)
Appendix 5-4 (332-332)
Appendix 5-5 (333-333)
Appendix 5-6 (334-334)
Appendix 5-7 (335-335)
BIBLIOGRAPHY (336-373)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 330
APPENDIXES 330 Appendix 5-2 Detailed Tenure Information from Departmental Survey Men Women Tenured Not tenured Total Tenured Not tenured Total Biology 89 16 105 29 5 34 Chemistry 79 22 101 11 0 11 Civil Engineering 74 15 89 11 2 13 Electrical Engineering 91 10 101 9 0 9 Mathematics 106 16 122 14 1 15 Physics 106 7 113 5 0 5 High prestige institution 79 22 101 11 1 13 Medium prestige institution 74 12 86 15 0 15 Low prestige institution 392 52 444 60 7 67 Total 545 86 631 Public institution 425 54 479 62 5 67 Private institution 130 32 162 17 3 20 Total 555 86 641 Stop the clock policy 113 22 135 16 1 17 No stop the clock policy 417 60 477 60 6 66 Total 530 82 612 Note: There were 755 tenure decisions reported by 319 departments that reported having at least one tenure case during the two years of the study. In 631 of those tenure decisions, the candidate was a man. In 124 decisions, the candidate was a female. We deleted 37 cases in which the candidate was a woman but the department reported having no female tenure-track faculty at the assistant or associate professor levels. Thus there are only 87 tenure decisions involving women. The column labeled Tenure shows the number of decisions that were positive, while the column labeled Not tenured shows the number of negative decisions. There were five decisions for which information about the stop-the-clock policy was missing that involved women and 19 decisions that involved men. Source: Departmental surveys PREPUBLICATION COPY