Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK
list:$34.50
Web:$31.05
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

Free PDF Access

topleft topright

The National Academies Keck Futures Initiative: The Future of Human Healthspan: Demography, Evolution, Medicine, and Bioengineering, Task Group Summaries (2008)

Page
59
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


The Future of Human Healthspan: Demography, Evolution, Medicine, and Bioengineering - Task Group Summaries

Pearlman, J., R. A. Cooper, E. Zipfel, R. Cooper, and M. McCartney. 2006. Towards the development of an effective technology transfer model of wheelchairs to developing countries. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 1(1-2):103-110.

Talbot, L. A., J. M. Gaines, T. N. Huynh, and E. J. Metter. 2003. A home-based pedometer-driven walking program to increase physical activity in older adults with osteoarthritis of the knee: A preliminary study. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 51(3):387-392.

Trudel, T. M., W. W. Tryon, and C. M. Purdum. 1998. Awareness of disability and long-term outcome after traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology 43(4):267-281.

Winters, J. M. 2006. Future possibilities for interface technologies that enhance universal access to health care devices and services. In Medical Instrumentation: Accessibility and Usability Considerations, 1st ed., eds. J. M. Winters and M. F. Story, pp. 321-339. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis, CRC Press.

TASK GROUP DESCRIPTION—GROUP A

Rewritten by Noah Barron, Graduate Journalism Student, University of Southern California


(As stated in the preface, “Some groups decided to refine or redefine their problems based on their experiences.” This Task Group Description was rewritten by Noah Barron to reflect Group A’s decision to redefine the challenge at hand.)

Background

Imagine for a moment the senior citizen of the future. She lives in a smart home that’s tailored to her every need, engineered to keep her healthy, active, and independent. Sensors tuned to her specific biometrics read her mood and whereabouts. The flooring is ready to dissolve into a cushioning gel in case she takes a potentially hip-shattering fall. The appliances wirelessly talk to one another to cook her meals and automatically order more milk when she’s running low.

All of these technological marvels serve a common purpose: to keep our senior independent. A residence like the one above would allow her to live on her own longer and delay institutionalization, perhaps indefinitely. Once a person is committed to nursing care, health and mental aptitude tend to rapidly decay. Staying out of that system and aging in place seems to be the key to living longer, healthier lives, explain senescence experts who study the mechanics of advanced-age living.

Page
59