| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2009. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page R1
Research Priorities in Emergency Preparedness and Response for Public Health Systems: A Letter Report
Research Priorities in Emergency Preparedness and Response for Public Health Systems
A Letter Report
Committee on Research Priorities in Emergency Preparedness and Response for Public Health Systems
Board on Health Sciences Policy
Bruce M. Altevogt, Andrew M. Pope, Martha N. Hill, and Kenneth I. Shine, Editors
INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
Washington, D.C.
www.nap.edu
OCR for page R2
Research Priorities in Emergency Preparedness and Response for Public Health Systems: A Letter Report
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS
500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001
NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.
This study was supported by Contract No. 200-2005-13434, TO #10 between the National Academy of Sciences and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the organizations or agencies that provided support for this project.
Additional copies of this report are available from the
National Academies Press,
500 Fifth Street, N.W., Lockbox 285, Washington, DC 20055; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area); Internet, http://www.nap.edu.
For more information about the Institute of Medicine, visit the IOM home page at: www.iom.edu.
Copyright 2008 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Printed in the United States of America.
The serpent has been a symbol of long life, healing, and knowledge among almost all cultures and religions since the beginning of recorded history. The serpent adopted as a logotype by the Institute of Medicine is a relief carving from ancient Greece, now held by the Staatliche Museen in Berlin.
Suggested citation: Institute of Medicine. 2008. Research priorities in emergency preparedness and response for public health systems: A letter report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
OCR for page R3
Research Priorities in Emergency Preparedness and Response for Public Health Systems: A Letter Report
“Knowing is not enough; we must apply.
Willing is not enough; we must do.”
—Goethe
INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES
Advising the Nation. Improving Health.
OCR for page R4
Research Priorities in Emergency Preparedness and Response for Public Health Systems: A Letter Report
THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES
Advisers to the Nation on Science, Engineering, and Medicine
The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences.
The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Charles M. Vest is president of the National Academy of Engineering.
The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine.
The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. Charles M. Vest are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council.
www.national-academies.org
OCR for page R5
Research Priorities in Emergency Preparedness and Response for Public Health Systems: A Letter Report
COMMITTEE ON RESEARCH PRIORITIES IN EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEMS
KENNETH I. SHINE (Chair),
The University of Texas System, Austin
MARTHA HILL (Vice Chair),
Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland
DAN BLAZER,
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
THEODORE CHAN,
San Diego Metropolitan Medical Strike Team, and University of California–San Diego School of Medicine
VINCENT T. COVELLO,
The Center for Risk Communication, New York
ED GABRIEL,
The Walt Disney Company, Burbank, California
JULIA GUNN,
Boston Public Health Commission, Massachusetts
SHARONA HOFFMAN,
Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
PAUL JARRIS,
The Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, Washington, DC
ÂNA-MARIE JONES,
CARD: Collaborating Agencies Responding to Disasters, Oakland, California
RICHARD C. LARSON,
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
JOHN LUMPKIN,
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, New Jersey
RICARDO MARTINEZ,
The Schumacher Group, Kennesaw, Georgia
JOANNE NIGG,
University of Delaware, Newark
PATRICIA QUINLISK,
Iowa Department of Public Health, Des Moines
DAVID ROSS,
Public Health Informatics Institute, Decatur, Georgia
IOM Staff
Bruce Altevogt, Study Director
David Butler, Senior Program Officer
Erin Hammers, Research Associate
Amy Haas, Administrative Assistant
Andrew Pope, Director,
Board on Health Sciences Policy
Rose Martinez, Director,
Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice
OCR for page R6
Research Priorities in Emergency Preparedness and Response for Public Health Systems: A Letter Report
This page intentionally left blank.
OCR for page R7
Research Priorities in Emergency Preparedness and Response for Public Health Systems: A Letter Report
INDEPENDENT REPORT REVIEWERS
This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the NRC's Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report:
Edward Baker, University of North Carolina School of Public Health
Frederick M. Burkle, Jr., Johns Hopkins University Medical Institutions, and Harvard School of Public Health
Bruce Calonge, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
Linda C. Degutis, Yale Center for Public Health Preparedness and Yale University Section of Emergency Medicine
Baruch Fischhoff, Carnegie Mellon University
Lynn R. Goldman, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Michelle A. Gourdine, Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
Maureen Lichtveld, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine
Judith Monroe, Indiana State Department of Health
OCR for page R8
Research Priorities in Emergency Preparedness and Response for Public Health Systems: A Letter Report
Eric K. Noji, The Pentagon
Peter Sandman, Risk Communication Consultant
Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusions or recommendations nor did they see the final draft of the letter report before its release. The review of this letter report was overseen by Don Detmer, American Medical Informatics Association, and David R. Challoner, University of Florida. Appointed by the National Research Council and Institute of Medicine, they were responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this letter report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this letter report rests entirely with the authoring committee and the institution.
OCR for page R9
Research Priorities in Emergency Preparedness and Response for Public Health Systems: A Letter Report
CONTENTS
BACKGROUND
5
Origin of the CDC-Funded Centers for Public Health Preparedness
7
METHODS
9
Definitions
9
FINDINGS
13
Guiding Principles for the Organization of Centers and Evaluation of Proposals
15
RECOMMENDATIONS
16
Enhancing the Usefulness of Training
18
Improving Timely Emergency Communications
20
Creating and Maintaining Sustainable Preparedness and Response Systems
22
Generating Effectiveness Criteria and Metrics
25
CONCLUSIONS
26
APPENDIXES
A
References
29
B
Public Meeting and Workshop Agenda
31
OCR for page R10
Research Priorities in Emergency Preparedness and Response for Public Health Systems: A Letter Report
This page intentionally left blank.