| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2009. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 49
Creating a Business Case for Quality Improvement Research: Expert Views - Workshop Summary
Appendix A
Workshop Agenda
Creating a Business Case for Quality Improvement and Quality Improvement Research
Monday, October 15, 2007
Doubletree Hotel
Crystal City, VA
8:30 am–5:30 pm
8:30 am
Welcome and Overview of Workshop, Including Objectives and Goals
Thomas Boat, Forum Co-Chair
Paul O’Neill, Forum Co-Chair
Scott Hamlin, Planning Committee Leader
9:00 am
Session 1: The Business Case for Quality and Quality Improvement Research
Herb Fritch, HealthSpring
James Bagian, Department of Veterans Affairs
Steve Spear, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Institute for Healthcare Improvement
Gary Kaplan, Virginia Mason
Marita Titler, University of Iowa
Moderator: Paul O’Neill, Forum Co-Chair
Issues to Be Addressed:
Is there a business case in today’s health care environment that is responsive and relevant to the leadership of health care and related research enterprises (including providers, payers, patients, government officials, academia, and employers)?
Is so, what are the economic/financial benefits of pursuing quality improvements and related
OCR for page 50
Creating a Business Case for Quality Improvement Research: Expert Views - Workshop Summary
research in the field? Illustrate how quality improvement and quality improvement research can impact greater production use of plant and human assets, lead to product differentiation and branding, generate revenue enhancements, improve cost structure, and impact other core operational goals to create competitive advantages.
What are the characteristics of an ideal enterprise culture and effective governance orientation that promote and accelerate improvement in quality and quality improvement research?
What are the business disciplines and support structures that are essential for leadership to fully exploit the economic/financial benefits of quality improvement and quality improvement research?
In order to drive organizational improvement from validated, well-researched data, how do you effectively measure and evaluate progress against quality improvement targets and quantify returns on investments made? What are the essential components of such a system?
Are there models in other industries such as aviation and nuclear power wherein the drive for quality has transformed product outcomes and customer/public safety? How do we learn from them?
11:30 am
Working Lunch
12:30 pm
Session 2: The Role of Policy Makers
Carolyn Clancy, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Barnett S. Kramer, National Institutes of Health
Moderator: Denise Cardo, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Issues to Be Addressed:
What are the fundamental public policy features and objectives that will lead to a transformational improvement in the quality and economic viability of our health care system?
OCR for page 51
Creating a Business Case for Quality Improvement Research: Expert Views - Workshop Summary
What role does transparency of outcomes and cost data play in driving quality improvement? How can quality improvement research better support these efforts? What public policy features might help to unleash its potential?
What public policy features are essential to help finance, promote, and reward relevant research into quality improvement sciences?
1:50 pm
Break
2:00 pm
Session 3: Research as a Driving Force for Quality Improvement and Broad Implementation
Jeffrey Alexander, University of Michigan
Patrick Romano, University of California, Davis
Joel Kupersmith, Department of Veterans Affairs
Moderator: Lori Melichar, The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
Issues to Be Addressed:
Are there effective research-oriented models in practice aimed at the translation of outcomes from improvement research to effective operational practices?
What are the relevant direct research capabilities and infrastructure support required to build and sustain this research, and what are the current and future extramural funding sources that will share the investment costs with institutions?
What measurements are relevant to evaluate the return on this investment and future sustainability of quality improvement research?
Can a priority agenda for quality improvement research be identified nationally to stimulate and validate such research efforts?
3:20 pm
Breakout Groups
Group 1 Topic Discussion—Developing the value proposition statement
Group 2 Topic Discussion—Effective intraorganizational spread of quality improvement gains
Group 3 Topic Discussion—Effective industrywide spread of quality improvement gains
OCR for page 52
Creating a Business Case for Quality Improvement Research: Expert Views - Workshop Summary
4:20 pm
Reports Back to Group
4:45 pm
Wrap-Up Session: Creating and Communicating a Value Proposition
Moderator: Thomas Boat, Forum Co-Chair
Issues to Be Addressed:
Who generates the value proposition statement and who is the targeted audience?
What are the targeted venues of communication?
Other “next steps” to move forward?
5:30 pm
Adjourn