Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 27
Appendix C Reviewers for This Letter Report This letter report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the National Research Council’s (NRC’s) Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published letter report as sound as possible and to ensure that the letter report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report: John M. Gilligan, SRA International Anita K. Jones, University of Virginia Butler Lampson, Microsoft Corporation Alan MacCormack, Harvard University David Notkin, University of Washington Harry D. Raduege, Jr., Deloitte Center for Network Innovation Alfred Z. Spector, Google, Inc. Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the conclusions or recommendations, nor did they see the final draft of the letter report before its release. The review of this letter report was monitored by William H. Press, Los Alamos National Laboratory. Appointed by the NRC, he was responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this letter report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this letter report rests entirely with the authoring committee and the institution. 27
OCR for page 27