| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 20, 2007
Harvey V. Fineberg, M.D., Ph.D. President Institute of Medicine 500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001 Dear Dr. Fineberg: Our nation faces a dual challenge of growing public health threats and soaring health care costs. A number of pressing public health problems, including the growing burden of chronic disease driven in part by an epidemic of obesity, and the threat of pandemic flu and other emerging infectious diseases, require a focused national response. Meanwhile, the capacity of the federal government, American businesses, and the ability of individual citizens to purchase health care is threatened by rampant growth in health care costs. The steadily rising cost of health care is already eroding employer-sponsored health insurance and placing enormous pressure on public coverage through Medicare and Medicaid. These challenges are interrelated: for example, the burden of chronic disease has major implications for health care spending. These challenges are not confined to particular states or regions of the country, and for that reason, they cannot effectively be addressed by individual states or private employers. The federal government must be involved. We are concerned, however, that the key federal department in this effort, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), may be hindered in meeting this challenge by its organizational structure. The existing mix of HHS agencies and missions evolved over several Administrations in a largely ad hoc manner. For this reason, HHS may not be optimally configured to achieve the twin goals of advancing health and controlling health care costs.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2009. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 163
HHS in the 21st Century: Charting a New Course for a Healthier America
B
Letter from Congressmen Waxman and Davis
HENRY A. WAXMAN, CALIFORNIA, CHAIRMAN
TOM LANTOS, CALIFORNIA
EDOLPHUS TOWNS, NEW YORK
PAUL E. KANJORSKI, PENNSYLVANIA
CAROLYN B. MALONEY, NEW YORK
ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, MARYLAND
DENNIS J. KUCINICH, OHIO
DANNY K. DAVIS, ILLINOIS
JOHN F. TIERNEY, MASSACHUSETTS
WM. LACY CLAY, MISSOURI
DIANE E. WATSON, CALIFORNIA
STEPHEN F. LYNCH, MASSACHUSETTS
BRIAN HIGGINS, NEW YORK
JOHN A. YARMUTH, KENTUCKY
BRUCE L. BRALEY, IOWA
ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
BETTY McCOLLUM, MINNESOTA
JIM COOPER, TENNESSEE
CHRIS VAN HOLLEN, MARYLAND
PAUL W. HODES, NEW HAMPSHIRE
CHRISTOPHER S. MURPHY, CONNECTICUT
JOHN P. SARBANES, MARYLAND
PETER WELCH, VERMONT
ONE HUNDERED TENTH CONGRESS
Congress of the United States
House of Representatives
COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM
2157 RAYBURN HOUSE OFFICE BUILDING
WASHINGTON, DC 20515–6143
MAJORITY (202) 225–5051
FACSIMILE (202) 225–4784
MINORITY (202) 225–5074
www.oversight.house.gov
TOM DAVIS, VIRGINIA, RANKING MINORITY MEMBER
DAN BURTON, INDIANA
CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, CONNECTICUT
JOHN M. McHUGH, NEW YORK
JOHN L. MICA, FLORIDA
MARK E. SOUDER, INDIANA
TODD RUSSELL PLATTS, PENNSYLVANIA
CHRIS CANNON, UTAH
JOHN J. DUNCAN, JR., TENNESSEE
MICHAEL R. TURNER, OHIO
DARRELL E. ISSA, CALIFORNIA
KENNY MARCHANT, TEXAS
LYNN A. WESTMORELAND, GEORGIA
PATRICK T. McHENRY, NORTH CAROLINA
VIRGINIA FOXX, NORTH CAROLINA
BRAIN P. BILBRAY, CALIFORNIA
BILL SALI, IDAHO
JIM JORDAN, OHIO
June 20, 2007
Harvey V. Fineberg, M.D., Ph.D.
President
Institute of Medicine
500 Fifth Street, NW Washington, DC 20001
Dear Dr. Fineberg:
Our nation faces a dual challenge of growing public health threats and soaring health care costs. A number of pressing public health problems, including the growing burden of chronic disease driven in part by an epidemic of obesity, and the threat of pandemic flu and other emerging infectious diseases, require a focused national response. Meanwhile, the capacity of the federal government, American businesses, and the ability of individual citizens to purchase health care is threatened by rampant growth in health care costs. The steadily rising cost of health care is already eroding employer-sponsored health insurance and placing enormous pressure on public coverage through Medicare and Medicaid. These challenges are interrelated: for example, the burden of chronic disease has major implications for health care spending.
These challenges are not confined to particular states or regions of the country, and for that reason, they cannot effectively be addressed by individual states or private employers. The federal government must be involved.
We are concerned, however, that the key federal department in this effort, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), may be hindered in meeting this challenge by its organizational structure. The existing mix of HHS agencies and missions evolved over several Administrations in a largely ad hoc manner. For this reason, HHS may not be optimally configured to achieve the twin goals of advancing health and controlling health care costs.
OCR for page 164
HHS in the 21st Century: Charting a New Course for a Healthier America
We are therefore writing to request that the Institute of Medicine undertake a study of whether HHS is ideally organized to meet the public health and health care cost challenges that our nation faces. What are the missions of the Department and its individual agencies, and how do those missions relate to the challenges confronting us? How effectively are the agencies organized to achieve their missions? Could the missions of individual HHS agencies be consolidated or realigned to make them more effective? What recommendations would the IOM make to the Congress and HHS to improve the focus of individual agencies, enhance their accountability, and improve their efficiency? What recommendations would IOM make to more effectively integrate promotion of public health and control of health care costs across the Department?
To be of the most benefit, this study should be concluded within the next year and a half and should produce recommendations that are administratively feasible, can be implemented in a relatively short time frame, and will not require substantial new resources. Thank you for your consideration of this request.
Sincerely,
Henry A. Waxman
Chairman
Tom Davis
Ranking Minority Member