The following HTML text is provided to enhance online
readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML.
Please use the page image
as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.
Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward
The issues covered during the committee’s hearings and deliberations included:
the fundamentals of the scientific method as applied to forensic practice—hypothesis generation and testing, falsifiability and replication, and peer review of scientific publications;
the assessment of forensic methods and technologies—the collection and analysis of forensic data; accuracy and error rates of forensic analyses; sources of potential bias and human error in interpretation by forensic experts; and proficiency testing of forensic experts;
infrastructure and needs for basic research and technology assessment in forensic science;
current training and education in forensic science;
the structure and operation of forensic science laboratories;
the structure and operation of the coroner and medical examiner systems;
budget, future needs, and priorities of the forensic science community and the coroner and medical examiner systems;
the accreditation, certification, and licensing of forensic science operations, medical death investigation systems, and scientists;
Scientific Working Groups (SWGs) and their practices;
forensic science practices—
pattern/experience evidence
fingerprints (including the interoperability of AFIS)
firearms examination
toolmarks
bite marks
impressions (tires, footwear)
bloodstain pattern analysis
handwriting
hair
analytical evidence
DNA
coatings (e.g., paint)
chemicals (including drugs)
materials (including fibers)
fluids
serology
fire and explosive analysis
digital evidence;
the effectiveness of coroner systems as compared with medical examiner systems;