|
Items in cart [0] |
Questions? Call 888-624-8373 |
| Copyright © 2009. National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Statement |
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 223
Prepublication Copy—Subject to Further Editorial Correction
B
Statement of Task
The Panel on Alternative Liquid Transportation Fuels was tasked to examine the
technical potential for reducing reliance on petroleum-based fuels for transportation,
principally in automobiles and trucks but also in other vehicles and transportation modes,
through the use of alternatives to traditional petroleum sources. The focus of the panel’s
efforts would be on liquid fuels produced from plant feedstocks and liquid fuels that can
be derived from coal feedstocks. In keeping with the charge to the the Committee on
America’s Energy Future, the panel was not to recommend policy choices but would
assess the state of development of technologies.
The panel was charged to evaluate technologies on the basis of their estimated
times to initial commercial deployment and to provide the following information on each:
• Initial deployment times < 10 yr: costs, performance, and effects.
• 10-25 yr: barriers, implications for costs, and R&D challenges and needs.
• > 25 yr: barriers and R&D challenges and needs, especially basic-research needs.
The primary focus of the study would be on the quantitative characterization of
technologies whose initial deployment times would be less than 10 yr.In light of existing
studies and literature and the panel’s own knowledge and expertise, the following should
be considered for each feedstock or technology pathway chosen by the panel to the extent
that existing data allow:
• For biomass-based liquid fuels, estimate the full fuel-cycle input—for example,
energy, water, fertilizer, and land—needed to grow, collect and harvest, and process and
convert the feedstock into a unit of fuel output. As part of its effort, the panel would also
describe the implications for land use, agricultural practices, prices, externalities (such as
implications for the environment), and other factors that it believes are important.
• For liquid fuels from coal, estimate the full fuel-cycle requirements—for example,
mining, transport, and water—per unit of fuel produced.
223
OCR for page 224
Prepublication Copy—Subject to Further Editorial Correction
• Estimate capital and operating costs per unit of output and total cost per unit of
output. Costs per unit of output should be calculated on a consistent and comparable
basis.
• Estimate full fuel-cycle environmental emissions per unit of fuel output—for
example, carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, criteria pollutants, heavy metals—
and land, water, and other effects identified by the panel that should be included.
It is expected that the panel would need to consider those technologies in the context of
and in competition with other fuels that may enter the transportation sector during the
periods examined by the panel, such as hydrogen, natural gas, electricity to power hybrid
vehicles, reformulated gasoline, and petroleum-derived gasoline and diesel. The
Committee on America/s Energy Future, by drawing on existing National Academies and
other recent comprehensive energy studies, will address the state of technology for
hydrogen-fueled and hybrid electric vehicles.
224
