Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK
list:$44.25
Web:$39.83
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

Free PDF Access

topleft topright

Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop (2009)
Ocean Studies Board (OSB)

Page
121
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop

The Interface Between Biological and Physical Processes

Mark Abbott*

NEW APPROACHES TO ECOSYSTEM MODELING

The present structure of our nitrogen/phytoplankton/zooplankton (NPZ) models has been unchanged for over 60 years. Although we have added more components, the basic model assumes that everything can be based on a single element (nitrogen) and that the basic interactions are analogous to chemical reactions where the components can be represented as continuous fields of reactants. The models are basically plumbing with various reservoirs and complex functions that represent the flow of nitrogen from one reservoir to another. As our knowledge of ecosystems has improved, we have added more reservoirs (e.g., adding the microbial loop, accounting for fixation of nitrogen), but once we establish the basic structure of the ecosystem, then it is difficult to model how the system will adapt to changes in environmental forcing. Doney et al. (2004) proposed that a new class of models be developed that are based on ecosystem functions rather than trophic levels. Such functions could include processes such as nitrogen fixation, recycling, etc., where the structure would resemble models of genetic regulation that link environmental conditions with the expressions of particular genes (or in this case, functions). For example, could we express the export of surface carbon as a function that would be triggered by spring bloom conditions? If so, what

*

College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University

Page
121
Front Matter (R1-R12)
Introduction and Goals--Linwood Vincent (1-2)
Integrated Oceanography in 2025--John J. Cullen (3-5)
Oceanography in 2028--Mark Abbott (6-10)
The Changing Relationship Between Humans and the Ocean--J. G. Bellingham (11-13)
Societal Implications for Ocean Research in 2025--Matthew Alford (14-16)
Oceanography in 2025: Responding to Growing Populations on a Rapidly Changing Planet--Scott Glenn (17-21)
Some Thoughts on Physical Oceanography in 2025--Ken Melville (22-25)
The Next-Generation Coupled Atmosphere-Wave-Ocean-Ice-Land Models for Ocean Research and Prediction--Shuyi S. Chen (26-27)
Science in Action, Episode 1: Exploring Boundaries--Meghan F. Cronin (28-30)
Real Time Decision Support Everywhere--Nathaniel G. Plant (31-35)
Trends in Oceanography: More Data, More People, More Relevance--J. Thomson (36-38)
Future Developments to Observational Physical Oceanography--Tom Sanford (39-42)
Prospects for Oceanography in 2025--Michael Gregg (43-45)
Oceanography in 2025--John Orcutt (46-48)
Thoughts on Oceanography in 2025--Daniel Rudnick (49-51)
The Role of Observations in the Future of Oceanography--Raffaele Ferrari (52-54)
The Future . . . One More Time--Rob Pinkel (55-57)
The Role of Acoustics in Ocean Observing Systems--Peter Worcester and Walter Munk (58-62)
Oceanography in 2025--Walter Munk (63-64)
Physical Oceanography in 2025--Chris Garrett (65-67)
A Vision of Future Physical Oceanography Research--James J. O'Brien (68-69)
Some Thoughts on Logistics, Mixing, and Power--J. N. Moum (70-72)
Ageostrophic Circulation in the Ocean--Peter Niiler (73-76)
The Future of Ocean Modeling--Sonya Legg, Alistair Adcroft, Whit Anderson, V. Balaji, John Dunne, Stephen Griffies, Robert Hallberg, Matthew Harrison, Isaac Held, Tony Rosati, Robbie Toggweiler, Geoff Vallis, and Laurent White (77-80)
Towards Nonhydrostatic Ocean Modeling with Large-eddy Simulation--Oliver B. Fringer (81-83)
Simulations of Marine Turbulence and Surface Waves: Potential Impacts of Petascale Technology--Peter P. Sullivan (84-88)
Computational Simulation and Submesoscale Variability--James C. McWilliams (89-91)
Ocean Measurements from Space in 2025--A. Freeman (92-97)
Future of Nearshore Processes Research--Rob Holman (98-100)
Future Directions in Nearshore Oceanography--H. Tuba Özkan-Haller (101-103)
Science Strategies for the Arctic Ocean--Mary-Louise Timmermans (104-106)
Submesoscale Variability of the Upper Ocean: Patchy and Episodic Fluxes Into and Through Biologically Active Layers--Daniel Rudnick, Mary Jane Perry, John J. Cullen, Bess Ward, and Kenneth S. Johnson (107-110)
Who's Blooming? Toward an Understanding of Why Certain Species Dominate Phytoplankton Blooms--Mary Jane Perry, Michael Sieracki, Bess Ward, and Alan Weidemann (111-114)
Understanding Phytoplankton Bloom Development--Bess Ward and Mary Jane Perry (115-117)
From Short Food Chains to Complex Interaction Webs: Biological Oceanography in 2025--Kelly J. Benoit-Bird (118-120)
The Interface Between Biological and Physical Processes--Mark Abbott (121-123)
Research on Higher Trophic Levels--Daniel P. Costa, Yann Tremblay, and Sean Hayes (124-129)
Marine Biogeochemistry in 2025--Kenneth S. Johnson (130-134)
Next-Generation Oceanographic Sensors for Short-Term Prediction/Verification of In-water Optical Conditions--Mark L. Wells (135-137)
Evolution of Autonomous Platform for Sustained Ocean Observations--Russ E. Davis (138-140)
Toward an Interdisciplinary Ocean Observing System in 2025--Eric D'Asaro (141-143)
Small Scale Ocean Dynamics in 2025--Jonathan Nash (144-145)
Oceanography in 2025--Dana R. Yoerger (146-149)
The Research Vessel Problem--J. N. Moum, Eric D'Asaro, Mary-Louise Timmermans, and Peter Niiler (150-152)
"Ocean Mapping" in 2025--Larry Mayer (153-156)
Seismic Oceanography: Imaging Oceanic Finestructure with Reflection Seismology--W. Steven Holbrook (157-162)
The Ocean Planet 2.0: A Vision for 2025--Justin Manley (163-165)
Force Projection Through the Littoral Zone: Optical Considerations--Kendall Carder (166-170)
Large Scale Phase-resolved Simulations of Ocean Surface Waves--Yuming Liu and Dick K.P. Yue (171-176)
Appendixes (177-178)
Appendix A: Workshop Agenda (179-180)
Appendix B: Workshop Participants (181-186)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 121
Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop The Interface Between Biological and Physical Processes Mark Abbott* NEW APPROACHES TO ECOSYSTEM MODELING The present structure of our nitrogen/phytoplankton/zooplankton (NPZ) models has been unchanged for over 60 years. Although we have added more components, the basic model assumes that everything can be based on a single element (nitrogen) and that the basic interactions are analogous to chemical reactions where the components can be represented as continuous fields of reactants. The models are basically plumbing with various reservoirs and complex functions that represent the flow of nitrogen from one reservoir to another. As our knowledge of ecosystems has improved, we have added more reservoirs (e.g., adding the microbial loop, accounting for fixation of nitrogen), but once we establish the basic structure of the ecosystem, then it is difficult to model how the system will adapt to changes in environmental forcing. Doney et al. (2004) proposed that a new class of models be developed that are based on ecosystem functions rather than trophic levels. Such functions could include processes such as nitrogen fixation, recycling, etc., where the structure would resemble models of genetic regulation that link environmental conditions with the expressions of particular genes (or in this case, functions). For example, could we express the export of surface carbon as a function that would be triggered by spring bloom conditions? If so, what * College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University

OCR for page 122
Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop are the environmental processes that initiate blooms? Such new modeling approaches could lead us beyond the problems of parameter estimation and model tuning which are inhibiting the development of models that represent the complexity of ocean ecosystems, especially in the context of climate change. COUPLING OF VERTICAL VELOCITIES TO NUTRIENT FLUXES Most circulation models have difficulties simulating vertical velocity. Because of a range of factors, model estimates tend to be smoother than the observations as conditions of strong vertical velocity are restricted to small scales in time and space. For calculations of physical quantities such as heat and momentum fluxes, highly smoothed estimates are likely acceptable. However, for biogeochemical processes such as nutrient uptake and photosynthesis, the nonlinear nature of these processes amplifies the response, such that small changes in the predicted light field have significant biological impact. Thus errors in vertical velocities that may be small and inconsequential in the context of physical processes may have enormous impacts on biogeochemical and ecological models. Regions such as the Polar Front are dominated by localized upwelling and downwelling, and incorporating these processes in coupled models will be a significant challenge over the next 20 years. UPTAKE OF CO2 BY THE OCEAN Most biogeochemical models assume that the ocean will continue to take up and sequester about two gigatons/year of atmospheric CO2. However, ocean CO2 uptake may diminish in response to changes in ocean pH and in climate forcing. For example, phytoplankton blooms might be less frequent in a warmer ocean, slowing down an important pathway for the downward flux of organic carbon. Because of the complexity of the relationships between climate forcing, biogeochemistry, and ecosystem response, this question will be an important issue for the next 20 years. MECHANISMS UNDERLYING CLIMATE OSCILLATIONS Coupled models still have difficulties reproducing major oscillations in the ocean/atmosphere system such as the ENSO, the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), and the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO). As these processes can serve as natural laboratories to observe responses of ocean ecosystems to changes in physical forcing, it is important that our models begin to capture these important components of the Earth system.

OCR for page 123
Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop THE ROLE OF “RARE” SPECIES In any sample of surface ocean water, the phytoplankton biomass is dominated by a handful of species with the rest of the sample composed of species that are represented by only a few individuals. These species never dominate the phytoplankton community, instead only occurring in small numbers. We do not understand their role in the ecosystem or biogeochemical cycling. Moreover, we do not understand how they persist in oligotrophic environments where there may be significant competition for nutrients. IMPACTS OF GEOENGINEERING With increasing economic and political pressures for carbon sequestration (e.g., cap and trade for carbon) as well as climate change mitigation, there may be both government and private sector efforts to fertilize the upper ocean through iron additions, artificial upwelling, etc. At-sea aquaculture could also be considered a type of geoengineering. The point is that the oceans will become more “managed” rather than simply exploited. REFERENCE Doney, S.C., M.R. Abbott, J.J. Cullen, D.M. Karl, and L. Rothstein. 2004. From Genes to Ecosystems: The Ocean’s New Frontier. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2: 457-466.