National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$44.25
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop (2009)
Ocean Studies Board (OSB)

Citation Manager

Glickson, Deborah. "Evolution of Autonomous Platform for Sustained Ocean Observations--Russ E. Davis." Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
138
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop

Evolution of Autonomous Platform for Sustained Ocean Observations

Russ E. Davis*


In the 16 years until 2025 I believe changes to oceanography will be substantially incremental. This is particularly true for ocean observing where even relatively modest technical developments take a decade. Rather than give broad (and unreliable) prognostications about oceanography over these years, I prefer to focus on one specific evolutionary trend.

The worldwide Argo program is showing how significant scientific results can be derived from proliferated long-term sampling with autonomous vehicles. Argo floats were designed to minimize the cost of routine observations with a very limited set of sensors (mainly a CTD) and as a consequence, these relatively inexpensive floats have long design lives, no redundancy, and can support only a few of the lowest-powered sensors.

While appropriate for general-circulation studies, Argo floats are not well matched to the upper ocean where comprehensive, expensive, and energy consuming sensor suites are needed. The complex interactions of air-sea fluxes, ocean mixing, primary production, biogeochemistry, marine optics, marine acoustics, and fauna in the upper ocean demand sustained observation with comprehensive sensor suites. The questions to be answered are myriad and of practical and academic interest. For example, we do not understand the main mechanisms supporting air-

*

Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego

Page
138
Front Matter (R1-R12)
Introduction and Goals--Linwood Vincent (1-2)
Integrated Oceanography in 2025--John J. Cullen (3-5)
Oceanography in 2028--Mark Abbott (6-10)
The Changing Relationship Between Humans and the Ocean--J. G. Bellingham (11-13)
Societal Implications for Ocean Research in 2025--Matthew Alford (14-16)
Oceanography in 2025: Responding to Growing Populations on a Rapidly Changing Planet--Scott Glenn (17-21)
Some Thoughts on Physical Oceanography in 2025--Ken Melville (22-25)
The Next-Generation Coupled Atmosphere-Wave-Ocean-Ice-Land Models for Ocean Research and Prediction--Shuyi S. Chen (26-27)
Science in Action, Episode 1: Exploring Boundaries--Meghan F. Cronin (28-30)
Real Time Decision Support Everywhere--Nathaniel G. Plant (31-35)
Trends in Oceanography: More Data, More People, More Relevance--J. Thomson (36-38)
Future Developments to Observational Physical Oceanography--Tom Sanford (39-42)
Prospects for Oceanography in 2025--Michael Gregg (43-45)
Oceanography in 2025--John Orcutt (46-48)
Thoughts on Oceanography in 2025--Daniel Rudnick (49-51)
The Role of Observations in the Future of Oceanography--Raffaele Ferrari (52-54)
The Future . . . One More Time--Rob Pinkel (55-57)
The Role of Acoustics in Ocean Observing Systems--Peter Worcester and Walter Munk (58-62)
Oceanography in 2025--Walter Munk (63-64)
Physical Oceanography in 2025--Chris Garrett (65-67)
A Vision of Future Physical Oceanography Research--James J. O'Brien (68-69)
Some Thoughts on Logistics, Mixing, and Power--J. N. Moum (70-72)
Ageostrophic Circulation in the Ocean--Peter Niiler (73-76)
The Future of Ocean Modeling--Sonya Legg, Alistair Adcroft, Whit Anderson, V. Balaji, John Dunne, Stephen Griffies, Robert Hallberg, Matthew Harrison, Isaac Held, Tony Rosati, Robbie Toggweiler, Geoff Vallis, and Laurent White (77-80)
Towards Nonhydrostatic Ocean Modeling with Large-eddy Simulation--Oliver B. Fringer (81-83)
Simulations of Marine Turbulence and Surface Waves: Potential Impacts of Petascale Technology--Peter P. Sullivan (84-88)
Computational Simulation and Submesoscale Variability--James C. McWilliams (89-91)
Ocean Measurements from Space in 2025--A. Freeman (92-97)
Future of Nearshore Processes Research--Rob Holman (98-100)
Future Directions in Nearshore Oceanography--H. Tuba Özkan-Haller (101-103)
Science Strategies for the Arctic Ocean--Mary-Louise Timmermans (104-106)
Submesoscale Variability of the Upper Ocean: Patchy and Episodic Fluxes Into and Through Biologically Active Layers--Daniel Rudnick, Mary Jane Perry, John J. Cullen, Bess Ward, and Kenneth S. Johnson (107-110)
Who's Blooming? Toward an Understanding of Why Certain Species Dominate Phytoplankton Blooms--Mary Jane Perry, Michael Sieracki, Bess Ward, and Alan Weidemann (111-114)
Understanding Phytoplankton Bloom Development--Bess Ward and Mary Jane Perry (115-117)
From Short Food Chains to Complex Interaction Webs: Biological Oceanography in 2025--Kelly J. Benoit-Bird (118-120)
The Interface Between Biological and Physical Processes--Mark Abbott (121-123)
Research on Higher Trophic Levels--Daniel P. Costa, Yann Tremblay, and Sean Hayes (124-129)
Marine Biogeochemistry in 2025--Kenneth S. Johnson (130-134)
Next-Generation Oceanographic Sensors for Short-Term Prediction/Verification of In-water Optical Conditions--Mark L. Wells (135-137)
Evolution of Autonomous Platform for Sustained Ocean Observations--Russ E. Davis (138-140)
Toward an Interdisciplinary Ocean Observing System in 2025--Eric D'Asaro (141-143)
Small Scale Ocean Dynamics in 2025--Jonathan Nash (144-145)
Oceanography in 2025--Dana R. Yoerger (146-149)
The Research Vessel Problem--J. N. Moum, Eric D'Asaro, Mary-Louise Timmermans, and Peter Niiler (150-152)
"Ocean Mapping" in 2025--Larry Mayer (153-156)
Seismic Oceanography: Imaging Oceanic Finestructure with Reflection Seismology--W. Steven Holbrook (157-162)
The Ocean Planet 2.0: A Vision for 2025--Justin Manley (163-165)
Force Projection Through the Littoral Zone: Optical Considerations--Kendall Carder (166-170)
Large Scale Phase-resolved Simulations of Ocean Surface Waves--Yuming Liu and Dick K.P. Yue (171-176)
Appendixes (177-178)
Appendix A: Workshop Agenda (179-180)
Appendix B: Workshop Participants (181-186)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 138
Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop Evolution of Autonomous Platform for Sustained Ocean Observations Russ E. Davis* In the 16 years until 2025 I believe changes to oceanography will be substantially incremental. This is particularly true for ocean observing where even relatively modest technical developments take a decade. Rather than give broad (and unreliable) prognostications about oceanography over these years, I prefer to focus on one specific evolutionary trend. The worldwide Argo program is showing how significant scientific results can be derived from proliferated long-term sampling with autonomous vehicles. Argo floats were designed to minimize the cost of routine observations with a very limited set of sensors (mainly a CTD) and as a consequence, these relatively inexpensive floats have long design lives, no redundancy, and can support only a few of the lowest-powered sensors. While appropriate for general-circulation studies, Argo floats are not well matched to the upper ocean where comprehensive, expensive, and energy consuming sensor suites are needed. The complex interactions of air-sea fluxes, ocean mixing, primary production, biogeochemistry, marine optics, marine acoustics, and fauna in the upper ocean demand sustained observation with comprehensive sensor suites. The questions to be answered are myriad and of practical and academic interest. For example, we do not understand the main mechanisms supporting air- * Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego

OCR for page 139
Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop sea fluxes under high winds, or those responsible for stirring within the mixed layer or with the well stratified ocean below, nor how these processes affect the distribution of passive or living material in the ocean. Models that seek to predict variability of currents, ambient noise, rates of atmospheric CO2 exchange, ecosystem evolution, optical properties, acoustic propagation, and even the oceanic consequences of global change all parameterize these processes, often using simple hypotheses about mechanisms that are calibrated with small data sets from a limited range of conditions. For simple questions like how deep a mixed layer will be, this leads to manageable quantitative errors. For complex questions, like ocean optical structure or nutrient cycling through the food web, it can lead to larger qualitative errors. There are many ways to improve the factual basis for ocean models. New, more comprehensive, sophisticated and accurate sensors are needed. Improved data assimilation procedures for using data to test and improve models are essential. But the complexity of upper ocean biophysical coupling and the spectrum of associated time scales also demand many multi-year, multi-variable time series from available sensors deployed in a range of locations to isolate and quantify the key processes and parameterize them. Ships and moorings will often be the right platforms, but they are too expensive for proliferated long-term use. Profiling floats are economical, but today’s platforms neither carry the energy nor provide the reliability to properly support comprehensive sensor suites. I believe a new class of platform will become a focus of future ocean observations. Characteristics of this class of vehicles follow: They will be free-drifting to avoid expensive deployment and recovery operations, will cycle vertically like Argo floats so a single sensor generates a profile, and will communicate only at the surface. Unlike Argo floats, they will carry comprehensive high-value sensor systems, will include system redundancies for reliability, will be re-used, and will have flexible mounting systems for varied sensors and a modular approach to power management, data recording and relay, and real time control of the vehicle and sensors. Relatively extensive sensor suites will generate profiles when the vehicle cycles to depth and back. Typical sensors to be carried include CTD, multiple wavelength fluorescence, optical backscatter and/or transmission, Laser Doppler Velocimeter or thrust probe for turbulence, Laser Optical Plankton Counter, chemical sensors for oxygen, pH, CO2 and/or nutrients, and an optically sensed and occasionally flushed sediment trap. ADCPs for abso-

OCR for page 140
Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop lute currents, multi-frequency sonars for acoustic backscatter and biological remote sensing, and/or accelerometer-based surface wave sensors could be used during extended surface intervals. Additional characteristics that cannot be implemented today include: Novel energy sources or energy renewal from solar, wind or wave harvesting at the surface; Lightweight or remotely sensing instruments for wind measurements, air temperature humidity, and atmospheric optical properties that might profile upward; A combination of acoustic detection and optical identification that could provide reproducible measures of large-plankton and fish abundances. What is needed now is not so much a specific instrument as a line of scientific and technical developments leading to a class of multi-use autonomous instruments.