Questions? Call 888-624-8373

PAPERBACK
list:$44.25
Web:$39.83
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

Free PDF Access

topleft topright

Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop (2009)
Ocean Studies Board (OSB)

Page
141
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop

Toward an Interdisciplinary Ocean Observing System in 2025

Eric D’Asaro*


The changes in our ability to observe the physical aspects of the ocean over the last 30 years have been remarkable. I can now go to the Internet and get estimates of the ocean stratification, currents and atmospheric forcing anywhere in the world. These products are constructed primarily from climatologies, Argo float data, satellite observations and numerical model systems that assimilate both oceanographic and meteorological data. These estimates and the associated predictions are imperfect in many ways, but their skill demonstrates the remarkable success of physical oceanography in measuring and understanding the dynamics of ocean circulation. This observing system is dramatically changing the way that physical oceanography is conducted and will continue to do so. I hope, and expect, that similar changes will occur in the study of ocean biogeochemical processes by 2025. This note outlines my thoughts on the driving forces toward this change, possible pitfalls and the resulting social changes in the field. I will focus on the autonomous ocean component, since that’s what I know, while ignoring the important satellite and modeling components.

The key force driving this change will be sensors. A crucial development behind physical oceanography’s switch from water sampling to electronic sensors has been Seabird Electronics sustained efforts to honestly meet the WOCE standards for CTD accuracy. As a result, relatively inexpensive temperature and salinity measurements can be made by

*

Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington

Page
141
Front Matter (R1-R12)
Introduction and Goals--Linwood Vincent (1-2)
Integrated Oceanography in 2025--John J. Cullen (3-5)
Oceanography in 2028--Mark Abbott (6-10)
The Changing Relationship Between Humans and the Ocean--J. G. Bellingham (11-13)
Societal Implications for Ocean Research in 2025--Matthew Alford (14-16)
Oceanography in 2025: Responding to Growing Populations on a Rapidly Changing Planet--Scott Glenn (17-21)
Some Thoughts on Physical Oceanography in 2025--Ken Melville (22-25)
The Next-Generation Coupled Atmosphere-Wave-Ocean-Ice-Land Models for Ocean Research and Prediction--Shuyi S. Chen (26-27)
Science in Action, Episode 1: Exploring Boundaries--Meghan F. Cronin (28-30)
Real Time Decision Support Everywhere--Nathaniel G. Plant (31-35)
Trends in Oceanography: More Data, More People, More Relevance--J. Thomson (36-38)
Future Developments to Observational Physical Oceanography--Tom Sanford (39-42)
Prospects for Oceanography in 2025--Michael Gregg (43-45)
Oceanography in 2025--John Orcutt (46-48)
Thoughts on Oceanography in 2025--Daniel Rudnick (49-51)
The Role of Observations in the Future of Oceanography--Raffaele Ferrari (52-54)
The Future . . . One More Time--Rob Pinkel (55-57)
The Role of Acoustics in Ocean Observing Systems--Peter Worcester and Walter Munk (58-62)
Oceanography in 2025--Walter Munk (63-64)
Physical Oceanography in 2025--Chris Garrett (65-67)
A Vision of Future Physical Oceanography Research--James J. O'Brien (68-69)
Some Thoughts on Logistics, Mixing, and Power--J. N. Moum (70-72)
Ageostrophic Circulation in the Ocean--Peter Niiler (73-76)
The Future of Ocean Modeling--Sonya Legg, Alistair Adcroft, Whit Anderson, V. Balaji, John Dunne, Stephen Griffies, Robert Hallberg, Matthew Harrison, Isaac Held, Tony Rosati, Robbie Toggweiler, Geoff Vallis, and Laurent White (77-80)
Towards Nonhydrostatic Ocean Modeling with Large-eddy Simulation--Oliver B. Fringer (81-83)
Simulations of Marine Turbulence and Surface Waves: Potential Impacts of Petascale Technology--Peter P. Sullivan (84-88)
Computational Simulation and Submesoscale Variability--James C. McWilliams (89-91)
Ocean Measurements from Space in 2025--A. Freeman (92-97)
Future of Nearshore Processes Research--Rob Holman (98-100)
Future Directions in Nearshore Oceanography--H. Tuba Özkan-Haller (101-103)
Science Strategies for the Arctic Ocean--Mary-Louise Timmermans (104-106)
Submesoscale Variability of the Upper Ocean: Patchy and Episodic Fluxes Into and Through Biologically Active Layers--Daniel Rudnick, Mary Jane Perry, John J. Cullen, Bess Ward, and Kenneth S. Johnson (107-110)
Who's Blooming? Toward an Understanding of Why Certain Species Dominate Phytoplankton Blooms--Mary Jane Perry, Michael Sieracki, Bess Ward, and Alan Weidemann (111-114)
Understanding Phytoplankton Bloom Development--Bess Ward and Mary Jane Perry (115-117)
From Short Food Chains to Complex Interaction Webs: Biological Oceanography in 2025--Kelly J. Benoit-Bird (118-120)
The Interface Between Biological and Physical Processes--Mark Abbott (121-123)
Research on Higher Trophic Levels--Daniel P. Costa, Yann Tremblay, and Sean Hayes (124-129)
Marine Biogeochemistry in 2025--Kenneth S. Johnson (130-134)
Next-Generation Oceanographic Sensors for Short-Term Prediction/Verification of In-water Optical Conditions--Mark L. Wells (135-137)
Evolution of Autonomous Platform for Sustained Ocean Observations--Russ E. Davis (138-140)
Toward an Interdisciplinary Ocean Observing System in 2025--Eric D'Asaro (141-143)
Small Scale Ocean Dynamics in 2025--Jonathan Nash (144-145)
Oceanography in 2025--Dana R. Yoerger (146-149)
The Research Vessel Problem--J. N. Moum, Eric D'Asaro, Mary-Louise Timmermans, and Peter Niiler (150-152)
"Ocean Mapping" in 2025--Larry Mayer (153-156)
Seismic Oceanography: Imaging Oceanic Finestructure with Reflection Seismology--W. Steven Holbrook (157-162)
The Ocean Planet 2.0: A Vision for 2025--Justin Manley (163-165)
Force Projection Through the Littoral Zone: Optical Considerations--Kendall Carder (166-170)
Large Scale Phase-resolved Simulations of Ocean Surface Waves--Yuming Liu and Dick K.P. Yue (171-176)
Appendixes (177-178)
Appendix A: Workshop Agenda (179-180)
Appendix B: Workshop Participants (181-186)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 141
Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop Toward an Interdisciplinary Ocean Observing System in 2025 Eric D’Asaro* The changes in our ability to observe the physical aspects of the ocean over the last 30 years have been remarkable. I can now go to the Internet and get estimates of the ocean stratification, currents and atmospheric forcing anywhere in the world. These products are constructed primarily from climatologies, Argo float data, satellite observations and numerical model systems that assimilate both oceanographic and meteorological data. These estimates and the associated predictions are imperfect in many ways, but their skill demonstrates the remarkable success of physical oceanography in measuring and understanding the dynamics of ocean circulation. This observing system is dramatically changing the way that physical oceanography is conducted and will continue to do so. I hope, and expect, that similar changes will occur in the study of ocean biogeochemical processes by 2025. This note outlines my thoughts on the driving forces toward this change, possible pitfalls and the resulting social changes in the field. I will focus on the autonomous ocean component, since that’s what I know, while ignoring the important satellite and modeling components. The key force driving this change will be sensors. A crucial development behind physical oceanography’s switch from water sampling to electronic sensors has been Seabird Electronics sustained efforts to honestly meet the WOCE standards for CTD accuracy. As a result, relatively inexpensive temperature and salinity measurements can be made by * Applied Physics Laboratory, University of Washington

OCR for page 142
Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop almost any observational group with accuracies sufficient for all but the most demanding applications. There is a vast potential for similar sensor development in chemical and biological oceanography, particularly given the large number of potentially measurable quantities. At present, sensors for oxygen, optical properties, and some nutrients are becoming sufficiently accurate and easy to use. Carbon system sensors will follow shortly. In the longer term we can hope, for example, for genomic measurements of species distributions. The second key element is platforms. The current technology of Argo floats is quite mature; gliders are rapidly maturing. Given the potentially large number of biogeochemical sensors, there is probably a need for vehicles with a larger payload capability than the current Argo floats. We have demonstrated the possibilities in the recent North Atlantic Bloom (NAB) experiment. Another missing piece is an AUV with the ability go long and slow, like a glider, as well as occasionally go fast when necessary, and be able to navigate in very shallow water (i.e., drive up to the dock). There is no reason why such a propeller driven vehicle cannot have the same endurance as a glider. The third key element is communications, which is also probably in good shape. Argo has demonstrated the great utility of even a very poor communications system (i.e., ARGOS). Iridium is much better and the company appears to have a solid and growing customer base. There appears to be enough global demand for their voice and data services to support this business. The Iridium satellites will need to be replaced before 2025 and the company has been moving forward with plans to do this. There will be many ways to stifle this change with good intentions. We are still in the early stages and the rate of innovation is high. There is a significant danger of freezing the design of a global observing system based on today’s technology, and thus shutting out tomorrow’s technology. For example, some call for a global system to observe oxygen from Argo floats. This is an excellent idea, but any plans to implement it should not preclude future measurements to observe the carbon system when these sensors become available. We do not yet know how to build an observing system for global ocean biogeochemistry. The ocean’s biogeochemical system is very complex, both in the number of variables and in its high degree of spatial and temporal variability. An observing system cannot measure everything, but must measure many things in many places. Figuring out how to do this right is a challenging and important task, with considerable “intellectual merit.” Managing the balance between science and engineering will also be challenging. Ocean science clearly needs good engineering, but keeping the engineering relevant to science requires constant attention. Fortunately, the task of designing new sensors, adding them to autonomous

OCR for page 143
Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop platforms and using them in creative ways can occur on the scale of a small group of PIs and engineers funded by grants and working with industry. If funding for this type of activity is available, it is easy to imagine several groups of this type maintaining a period of “transformational research” in which new ways of sampling the biogeochemical system are developed, tested and, through industrial partners, made available to the broader community. This new technology will change the way that ocean science is conducted. Already, the large stream of data freely available on the Internet has allowed many creative and productive physical oceanographers to operate with little direct connection to the process of ocean measurement. This is good for science, since it brings more brains to bear on the important problems, and good for education, because it allows faculty and students across the world to participate in research. Oceanography is becoming much more like meteorology, with oceanographers distributed more widely across academia, government and industry and with a significant quantity of applied work. As in meteorology, research programs can now be firmly set within a synoptic context defined by the global observing system. We can, for example, study the links between productivity and ocean physics not just “in the Sargasso Sea,” but also at chosen locations within its eddy field. It is inevitable that autonomous platforms will compete with the research fleet. Floats, gliders and moorings now allow us to sample the global ocean in ways that are impossible with ships. Two days of global ship time now cost roughly the same as a glider or 4-6 Argo floats. Today, most biogeochemical measurements are done from ships, thus providing a strong constituency for the maintenance of the fleet. As more and more biogeochemical oceanographers get their data from the web, rather than on cruises, this constituency will decrease. However, ships will always be able to measure more things in more detail than floats or gliders so there is plenty of room for creatively combining the two methodologies. I hope that these new observing technologies will promote interdisciplinary research within oceanography and between it and the broader earth systems sciences. Physical oceanography has had remarkable success by focusing on the dynamics associated with the spatial and temporal variability of the ocean. The new sensors will allow physics and biogeochemistry to be sampled on the same space and time scales and thus lead to large advances the understanding their interconnections. Just as the observational tools of physical oceanography applied to geophysical fluid dynamics resulted in today’s observational system, we can hope that the new biogeochemical tools applied to rigorously test and improve today’s primitive biogeochemical models will also result in a system for understanding and predicting the ocean’s biogeochemistry. Such advances will occur only through the formation of effective interdisciplinary teams spanning the ocean and earth science disciplines.