National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$44.25
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop (2009)
Ocean Studies Board (OSB)

Citation Manager

Glickson, Deborah. "A Vision of Future Physical Oceanography Research--James J. O'Brien." Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
68
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop

A Vision of Future Physical Oceanography Research

James J. O’Brien*


Despite great advances in understanding the physical ocean, I envision much new knowledge to be gained in the next 25 years. Most oceanographers still think about steady-state balances despite all the knowledge about variability—whether the topic is eddies or internal waves, etc. Almost every oceanographer describes the ocean in a steady-state manner (present reader is an exception, of course).

The atmosphere is heated from below, the ocean from above. In the lower atmosphere, coherent structures last a few weeks, while in the ocean, coherent structures created by internal ocean dynamics or atmospheric forcing lasts for months to decades. I know of only a few who understand this. This special behavior of the ocean means that blue water oceanography cannot be modeled very well without an adequate observational program.

HOW WILL THE RESEARCH BE CONDUCTED?

As to be expected, oceanographers will use every possible technique—in situ, satellites, drifting buoys, smart flyers, etc. Oceanographers have to give up their hoarding of data, paid to be collected by the federal agencies. In addition, deployment of resources has to be done wisely by testing hypotheses and considering understanding—called “experimental design”—which is rarely used in physical oceanography.

*

Florida State University

Page
68
Front Matter (R1-R12)
Introduction and Goals--Linwood Vincent (1-2)
Integrated Oceanography in 2025--John J. Cullen (3-5)
Oceanography in 2028--Mark Abbott (6-10)
The Changing Relationship Between Humans and the Ocean--J. G. Bellingham (11-13)
Societal Implications for Ocean Research in 2025--Matthew Alford (14-16)
Oceanography in 2025: Responding to Growing Populations on a Rapidly Changing Planet--Scott Glenn (17-21)
Some Thoughts on Physical Oceanography in 2025--Ken Melville (22-25)
The Next-Generation Coupled Atmosphere-Wave-Ocean-Ice-Land Models for Ocean Research and Prediction--Shuyi S. Chen (26-27)
Science in Action, Episode 1: Exploring Boundaries--Meghan F. Cronin (28-30)
Real Time Decision Support Everywhere--Nathaniel G. Plant (31-35)
Trends in Oceanography: More Data, More People, More Relevance--J. Thomson (36-38)
Future Developments to Observational Physical Oceanography--Tom Sanford (39-42)
Prospects for Oceanography in 2025--Michael Gregg (43-45)
Oceanography in 2025--John Orcutt (46-48)
Thoughts on Oceanography in 2025--Daniel Rudnick (49-51)
The Role of Observations in the Future of Oceanography--Raffaele Ferrari (52-54)
The Future . . . One More Time--Rob Pinkel (55-57)
The Role of Acoustics in Ocean Observing Systems--Peter Worcester and Walter Munk (58-62)
Oceanography in 2025--Walter Munk (63-64)
Physical Oceanography in 2025--Chris Garrett (65-67)
A Vision of Future Physical Oceanography Research--James J. O'Brien (68-69)
Some Thoughts on Logistics, Mixing, and Power--J. N. Moum (70-72)
Ageostrophic Circulation in the Ocean--Peter Niiler (73-76)
The Future of Ocean Modeling--Sonya Legg, Alistair Adcroft, Whit Anderson, V. Balaji, John Dunne, Stephen Griffies, Robert Hallberg, Matthew Harrison, Isaac Held, Tony Rosati, Robbie Toggweiler, Geoff Vallis, and Laurent White (77-80)
Towards Nonhydrostatic Ocean Modeling with Large-eddy Simulation--Oliver B. Fringer (81-83)
Simulations of Marine Turbulence and Surface Waves: Potential Impacts of Petascale Technology--Peter P. Sullivan (84-88)
Computational Simulation and Submesoscale Variability--James C. McWilliams (89-91)
Ocean Measurements from Space in 2025--A. Freeman (92-97)
Future of Nearshore Processes Research--Rob Holman (98-100)
Future Directions in Nearshore Oceanography--H. Tuba Özkan-Haller (101-103)
Science Strategies for the Arctic Ocean--Mary-Louise Timmermans (104-106)
Submesoscale Variability of the Upper Ocean: Patchy and Episodic Fluxes Into and Through Biologically Active Layers--Daniel Rudnick, Mary Jane Perry, John J. Cullen, Bess Ward, and Kenneth S. Johnson (107-110)
Who's Blooming? Toward an Understanding of Why Certain Species Dominate Phytoplankton Blooms--Mary Jane Perry, Michael Sieracki, Bess Ward, and Alan Weidemann (111-114)
Understanding Phytoplankton Bloom Development--Bess Ward and Mary Jane Perry (115-117)
From Short Food Chains to Complex Interaction Webs: Biological Oceanography in 2025--Kelly J. Benoit-Bird (118-120)
The Interface Between Biological and Physical Processes--Mark Abbott (121-123)
Research on Higher Trophic Levels--Daniel P. Costa, Yann Tremblay, and Sean Hayes (124-129)
Marine Biogeochemistry in 2025--Kenneth S. Johnson (130-134)
Next-Generation Oceanographic Sensors for Short-Term Prediction/Verification of In-water Optical Conditions--Mark L. Wells (135-137)
Evolution of Autonomous Platform for Sustained Ocean Observations--Russ E. Davis (138-140)
Toward an Interdisciplinary Ocean Observing System in 2025--Eric D'Asaro (141-143)
Small Scale Ocean Dynamics in 2025--Jonathan Nash (144-145)
Oceanography in 2025--Dana R. Yoerger (146-149)
The Research Vessel Problem--J. N. Moum, Eric D'Asaro, Mary-Louise Timmermans, and Peter Niiler (150-152)
"Ocean Mapping" in 2025--Larry Mayer (153-156)
Seismic Oceanography: Imaging Oceanic Finestructure with Reflection Seismology--W. Steven Holbrook (157-162)
The Ocean Planet 2.0: A Vision for 2025--Justin Manley (163-165)
Force Projection Through the Littoral Zone: Optical Considerations--Kendall Carder (166-170)
Large Scale Phase-resolved Simulations of Ocean Surface Waves--Yuming Liu and Dick K.P. Yue (171-176)
Appendixes (177-178)
Appendix A: Workshop Agenda (179-180)
Appendix B: Workshop Participants (181-186)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 68
Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop A Vision of Future Physical Oceanography Research James J. O’Brien* Despite great advances in understanding the physical ocean, I envision much new knowledge to be gained in the next 25 years. Most oceanographers still think about steady-state balances despite all the knowledge about variability—whether the topic is eddies or internal waves, etc. Almost every oceanographer describes the ocean in a steady-state manner (present reader is an exception, of course). The atmosphere is heated from below, the ocean from above. In the lower atmosphere, coherent structures last a few weeks, while in the ocean, coherent structures created by internal ocean dynamics or atmospheric forcing lasts for months to decades. I know of only a few who understand this. This special behavior of the ocean means that blue water oceanography cannot be modeled very well without an adequate observational program. HOW WILL THE RESEARCH BE CONDUCTED? As to be expected, oceanographers will use every possible technique—in situ, satellites, drifting buoys, smart flyers, etc. Oceanographers have to give up their hoarding of data, paid to be collected by the federal agencies. In addition, deployment of resources has to be done wisely by testing hypotheses and considering understanding—called “experimental design”—which is rarely used in physical oceanography. * Florida State University

OCR for page 69
Oceanography in 2025: Proceedings of a Workshop WHAT QUESTIONS WILL BE ANSWERED? By smart folks is the answer. The entire community must begin to embrace numerical models. There is currently an obsession with climate change but extreme events are more important. For example, meteorologists can predict where a hurricane can go but they cannot tell you how strong it will be tomorrow. The answer must be, at least partly, due to the lack of ocean data and understanding. This is an important oceanic problem. There are many others. WHAT QUESTIONS WILL REMAIN UNANSWERED? I don’t know. It depends on the investment made in oceanography. It is clear to me that great importance must depend on understanding the variability of the ocean. We need at least two scatterometers, but as of 2009 we cannot expect these until 2020. We need at least two altimeters, maybe four. These won’t be available soon. The first salinity satellite will not be flown until 2015.