(Page numbers in italic refer to boxed text not referenced in text.)
A
Abstraction, 136
America COMPETES Act, 15
American Association for the Advancement of Science, 15, 165
American Institute of Chemical Engineering, 31
American Institute of Electrical Engineers, 30–31
American Institute of Mining Engineers, 31
American Society for Engineering Education, 33
recommendations for, 9, 10, 160
American Society of Civil Engineers, 30
American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 30
Analysis, in design process, 83–86
Apprenticeship training, 30
Army Corps of Engineers, 29
B
Boise State University, 110–111
Boston Museum of Science, 53
Building Math, 79, 83–84, 85, 92–93, 99
Building Structures with Young Children, 87, 92, 99
C
California State University, 111–112
Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education, 53
Challenge-based environments, 54
Children Designing and Engineering, 76, 81, 83–84, 87, 92, 98
Chunking strategy, 129
City Technology, 81, 84, 85, 86, 91, 93, 100, 102
Cognitive load theory, 129
Cognitive processes
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 571
Index
(Page numbers in italic refer to boxed text not B
referenced in text.)
Berggren, David, 170–172
Boise State University, 110–111
Boston Museum of Science, 53
A
Building Math, 79, 83–84, 85, 92–93,
Abstraction, 136 99
America COMPETES Act, 15 Building Structures with Young Children,
American Association for the Advancement 87, 92, 99
of Science, 15, 165
American Institute of Chemical
Engineering, 31 C
American Institute of Electrical Engineers,
California State University, 111–112
30–31
Cal Teach, 111–112
American Institute of Mining Engineers, 31
Center for Innovation in Engineering and
American Society for Engineering
Science Education, 53
Education, 33
Challenge-based environments, 54
recommendations for, 9, 10, 160
Children Designing and Engineering, 76,
American Society of Civil Engineers, 30
81, 83–84, 87, 92, 98
American Society of Mechanical Engineers,
Chunking strategy, 129
30
City Technology, 81, 84, 85, 86, 91, 93, 100,
Analysis, in design process, 83–86
102
Apprenticeship training, 30
Cognitive load theory, 129
Army Corps of Engineers, 29
Cognitive processes
211
OCR for page 571
212 INDEX
Core engineering concepts and skills,
abstraction, 136
22–23, 41–43, 76–77, 119–121
benefits of engineering education, 53
drawing and representing, 133–137
critical thinking, 93
effective teaching strategies, 140–142
current understanding of engineering
experimenting and testing, 137–141
education, 140–141
necessary skills, 133
design process approach to problem-
See also Optimization of design;
solving, 4, 37, 39–41
Systems thinking
engineering habits of mind, 5–6, 152
Creativity, 5, 152
experimentation and testing, 137–140
Credentialing for engineering education, 9
implications for engineering education,
Critical thinking, 93
23
Cunningham, Christine, 112
multivariable analysis, 128–130, 138
Curricula, K–12 engineering
optimization concepts, student capacity
beads and thread model, 76–77
for understanding, 128
benefits of engineering instruction
recognition of emergent properties,
in math and science achievement,
125–127
53–55
role of modeling, 88
case studies, 169–179
scientific inquiry, 39–41
current shortcomings, 7–8, 20, 155–156
structure-behavior-function analysis,
data sources, 72–73
122–125
demographic diversity in, 101–103, 161
systems thinking, 5, 42, 91–92
descriptive summaries of, 74, 75–76
systems thinking, student capacity for,
design process in, 82–92
122–127
educational goals, 92–94
trade-offs, student capacity to
implementation and costs, 95–99
understand, 130–133
in-depth reviews of, 74–76
Coherence in educational systems, 12,
mathematics content, 77–80
163–164
modeling in, 87
Collaboration
optimization in, 89
in current engineering curricula, 85
programs reviewed, 74, 94–95
as engineering habit of mind, 5, 152
recommendations for diversity
in engineering profession, 31
promotion, 10, 161
in research and development, 20
recommendations for research, 7,
shortcomings of current STEM
154–155
education, 20
research objectives, 3, 21, 71
College of New Jersey, 110
science content, 80–81
Colorado State University, 110
state-mandated standards, 163
Communication
STEM connections in, 8, 157
as engineering habit of mind, 5, 152
strategies for incorporating engineering
goals of education for engineering
education, 10–11, 162–164
profession, 31
systems concepts in, 91–92
Computer-aided design, 133
teaching approaches with, 94, 99–101
Computer modeling, 87
technology content, 82
Constraints influencing design, 25, 38,
trade-offs in, 89–90
39–40, 43, 86–87
variety of programs, 76
OCR for page 571
INDEX 213
D E
Decentralized thinking, 126 Economic analysis, 85
Denver School of Science and Technology, Emergent properties, 125–127
175–179 Engineering is Elementary, 53, 76, 80, 81,
Department of Education, U.S., 15, 52 83–84, 85, 87, 91, 93, 98, 99, 100, 101
recommendations for, 8–9, 13, 158 Engineering Our Future New Jersey, 51–52,
Design and Discovery curriculum, 76, 81, 56
84, 85, 87, 91, 100, 101, 102 Engineering profession
Design-Based Science curriculum, 54–55 challenges for, in 21st century, 36, 37
Designing for Tomorrow, 84, 86, 92, 93, curricula designed as preparation for,
100–101, 102 93
Design process definition and scope of activities, 27–28
analysis in, 83–86 demographics, 33, 34
benefits of instruction in, 56–57 design process approach to problem-
characteristics, 4, 38, 40–41, 151 solving, 4, 37–41
cognitive components, 37 evolution of education and training for,
current K–12 engineering curricula, 29–30, 31–33
82–92 future challenges and opportunities,
definition for engineers, 38 44–45
economic considerations, 85 habits of mind, 5–6, 152
education benchmarks, 61 historical origins and development,
effective teaching strategies, 141–142 28–31
emphasis on, in engineering education, international comparisons, 34–36
4, 151 international competition, 44–45
experimentation and testing, 137–140 K–12 engineering education promoting
modeling in, 42, 87–88, 134 interest in, 57–60
rules and principles, 38 predictive analysis in, 42–43
scientific method and, 39–41 professional societies, 30–31
as social enterprise, 120 public perception and understanding
STEM education and, 8–9, 151–152 of, 55–56
steps, 38–39, 120 role of, 36
See also Constraints influencing design; science and mathematics in, 43–44
Optimization of design; Systems systems thinking in, 42
thinking use of modeling in, 42
Discover Engineering summer camp, workforce diversity, 10, 34, 44, 161
58–59 Engineering Projects in Community
Diversity in engineering education and Service, 171
workforce Engineering technology programs, 34
current state, 10, 34, 44, 160 Engineering the Future, 78, 81, 85, 100, 101
curricula design to promote, 101–103 Ethical thinking, 5–6, 152
rationale for promoting, 161 Experimentation and testing, 137–140
recommendations for, 10, 160 Exploded views, 133
strategies for promoting, 161 Exploring Design and Engineering, 93
trends, 44
Drawing and representing, 133–137
OCR for page 571
214 INDEX
International comparisons
F
engineering workforce, 34–36
Failure analysis, 85–86, 92 K–12 engineering curricula, 72
Full Option Science System, 78, 90, 91, 98, math and science education, 17–18, 52
101 pre-university engineering education,
Functional decomposition, 129–130 115–118
International Technology Education
Association, 18, 32, 33, 61, 163
G Introduction to Engineering Design, 83–84
Invention, Innovation, and Inquiry, 86,
Gateway to Technology, 76, 81, 83–84, 86,
90, 93
87, 88, 90, 93, 101–102
K
H
K–12 engineering education
Habits of mind, engineering, 5–6, 152
benefits, 1, 23, 49–51
Heffron, Mark, 177
case studies, 169–179
Heffron, Terry, 177
challenges to effective implementation,
High Tech High, 169–172
149
core concepts, 22–23, 41–43, 76–77,
119–121
I
current implementation, 1, 2, 6, 20,
Impact of engineering education initiatives 149–150, 152–153
current understanding, 6–7, 154 curricula. See Curricula, K–12
improved learning in math and science, engineering
51–55, 154 design emphasis, 4–5
increased awareness of engineering development of drawing and
tasks and profession, 55–56 representing skills, 133–137
increased technological literacy, 60–62 effective teaching strategies, 140–142
limitations of current data on, 63–64 full integration in STEM education, 11,
potential benefits, 1, 23 49–51 13, 162, 164–167
recommendations for research, 7, future prospects, 6, 154, 161–162, 167
154–155 goals, 3, 5–6, 45
research objectives, 3 grade-level benchmarks, 61
student interest in engineering careers, impact. See Impact of engineering
57–60 education initiatives
See also Learning outcomes implications for post-secondary
Industrial arts, 32, 33 education, 164
Industrial design, 88 increased awareness of engineering
Infinity Project, 76, 79–80, 83, 87–88, 91, tasks and profession through, 55–56
92, 93, 99–100, 102 increased technological literacy as result
Insights, 93 of, 60–62
INSPIRES, 113 informal activities, 72
Integrated Mathematics, Science, and international comparison of programs,
Technology, 53 115–118
OCR for page 571
INDEX 215
promoting engineering habits of mind,
math and science achievement
5–6, 152
enhanced by, 51–55, 154
recommendations for research, 7,
methodology for assessing current state
154–155
of, 2, 22
research goals, 119–120
objectives of research on, 3, 21–22,
student capacity for multivariable
24–26
analysis, 128–130, 138
origins, 6
student capacity for systems thinking,
principles of, 4–6, 151–152
122–127
in promoting engineering careers,
technology education goals, 18
57–60
understanding of trade-offs, 130–133
recommendations for diversity
See also Impact of engineering
promotion, 10, 161
education initiatives
recommendations for research, 7, 8–9,
Legacy cycles, 54
12, 154–155, 158, 164, 166
Lesley University, 111
research needs, 2, 3–4, 7, 20–21, 71
scope, 6, 152–154
shortcomings of research base, 63–64
M
standards and models of
implementation, 2, 12, 20, 156
Making representations, 135–136
STEM interaction, 2, 3, 5, 8–9, 150,
Material World Modules, 79, 80, 81, 85, 93,
156–159
98, 100
strategies for implementation, 10–11,
Mathematical modeling, 42–43, 80, 87–88
162–164
to understand trade-offs, 131
student engagement and learning, 119,
Mathematics instruction
120
benefits of engineering education in,
technical education and, 33
51–55, 56–57, 154, 157
See also Curricula, K–12 engineering;
current concerns, 15–18
Learning outcomes
in engineering education, 31, 77–80,
Kurtz, Bill, 176
151–152, 157
international comparison, 118
principles of engineering education
L
and, 5
scope, 17, 77
Learning-by-design, 140
See also STEM education
Learning outcomes
Mathematizing, 130
current concerns, 16–18
Math Out of the Box, 54
current understanding of, 119
Memory
development of drawing and
cognitive load theory, 129
representing skills, 133–137
strategies for multivariable analysis,
development of skills for
129–130
experimentation and testing,
Military engineering, 29–30
137–140
Minorities
engineering skills, 133
benefits of engineering instruction
goals for STEM education, 13
in math and science achievement,
goals of K–12 engineering education, 3,
53–54
22
OCR for page 571
216 INDEX
curricula design to promote P
engineering among, 101
PLTW. See Project Lead the Way
in engineering workforce, 10, 34, 44
Post-secondary education reform, 164
limitations of current research on
Predictive analysis, 42–43
engineering education, 63–64
Principles of K–12 engineering education,
recommendations for curricula design,
4–6, 151–152
10, 161
Problem-based learning, 140
Modeling, engineering concept of
Professional development for teachers
in current curricula, 87–88
characteristics of successful programs,
to enhance understanding of structure-
104–105
behavior-function, 124–125
current programs and utilization, 1, 6,
role of, 42, 87, 137–138
9, 103–112, 153, 159–160
role of mathematics in, 42, 157
future challenges, 164
skills development, 134, 135, 137
importance of, in K–12 engineering
teaching strategies, 141–142
education, 71–72
Models and Designs, 79, 101–102
in-service programs, 104–105, 159
Multivariable analysis, 128–130, 138
obstacles to, 112–113
pre-service initiatives, 105–112, 159
recommendations for improving, 9–10,
N
12, 160
National Academies, 15, 18 Project Lead the Way (PLTW), 51, 59, 76,
National Academy of Engineering, 78–79, 93, 95–98, 102–103, 110, 170.
36, 37 See also Gateway to Technology
National Assessment Governing Board, 62 Public perception and understanding
National Assessment of Education of engineering profession, 55–56
Progress, 52, 62
National Center for Engineering and
Technology Education, 10, 104–105 R
National Science Board, 15
Representations, 42, 135–137
National Science Foundation, 16
Reverse engineering, 91–92
recommendations for, 8–9, 13,
Rising Above the Gathering Storm:
158, 166
Energizing and Employing America
No Child Left Behind Act, 18, 163
for a Brighter Economic Future, 18
Runkle, John D., 32
Ryerson University, 58
O
Optimism, 5, 152
Optimization of design S
in current curricula, 89
Sandlin, Rick, 173
definition, 43, 89, 127–128
Schemas, 129
engineering concepts in, 121, 128
Science, technology, engineering, and
multivariable analysis in, 128–130
mathematics (STEM) education
student capacity for learning, 128
benefits of K–12 engineering education,
trade-offs in, 43, 89–90, 128, 130–133
1, 6–7, 150
OCR for page 571
INDEX 217
STEM. See Science, technology,
component subjects, 17
engineering, and mathematics
conceptual evolution, 16
education
current concerns, 2, 12–13, 15–16, 150,
Stevens Institute of Technology, 53
166
Structure-behavior-function, 121, 122–125
definition of STEM literacy, 13, 166
Summer Bridging Program, 60
full integration of engineering in, 11,
Sustainable design, 36
13, 162, 164–167
Systems thinking
future prospects, 14, 167
current curricula design, 91–92
interaction with K–12 engineering
definition, 42, 91
education, 2, 3, 5, 8–9, 150, 151–152,
emergent properties framework,
156–157
125–127
interconnections among component
engineering concepts, 42, 121
subjects, 20
in engineering design process, 121–122
learning outcome goals, 13, 15
as engineering habit of mind, 5, 152
recommendations for research, 7, 8–9,
structure-behavior-function
13, 154–155, 158–159, 164, 166
framework, 121, 122–125
teacher training for, 111–112
student capacity for, 122–127
Science education
benefits of engineering education in,
51–55, 56–57, 154
T
current concerns, 15–18
in engineering education, 31, 80–81,
Teaching
151–152, 157
classroom time for design activities, 141
international comparison, 118
cognitive strategies to enable
principles of engineering education
multivariable thinking, 128–130
and, 5
content knowledge for, 103
scope, 17, 80
curricula design and, 94, 99–101
See also STEM education
to develop drawing and representing
Science for All Americans, 40–41
skills, 134–137
Scientific method, 39–41, 137–138
effective strategies in engineering
Siloed teaching, 12–13, 20, 167
education, 140–142
Sketching, to facilitate multivariable
engineering presented as applied
analysis, 130
science, 119
Specifications, design, 38, 43
to enhance recognition of emergent
Sputnik era, 31
properties, 127
Stand-alone engineering courses, 11, 162
to enhance skills for experimentation
Standards for Technological Literacy:
and testing, 138–140
Content for the Study of Technology,
to enhance understanding of structure-
18, 32, 38, 61, 159
behavior-function, 124–125
Standards of instruction for engineering
to enhance understanding of trade-offs,
education
131–132
current shortcomings, 2, 20, 156
importance of, in K–12 engineering
state mandates, 163
education, 71–72
strategies for developing, 163–164
iterative modeling, 141–142
StarLogo, 125–126
sequencing of instruction, 142
State-mandated education standards, 163
OCR for page 571
218 INDEX
Trade-offs, in design process, 43, 89–90,
teacher understanding of engineering
128, 130–133
concepts, 112–113
Trends in International Mathematics and
See also Curricula, K–12 engineering;
Science Study, 17–18
Learning outcomes; Professional
development for teachers
Technically Speaking: Why All Americans
U
Need to Know More About
Technology, 60
University of California, 111–112
Technicians, engineering, 34
University of Texas, 112
Technologists, engineering, 34
US FIRST, 172
Technology education
UTeach, 112
civic responsibility and, 60
current implementation, 2, 9, 18–19
in current K–12 engineering curricula,
W
82, 158
current shortcomings, 18–19 Walden University, 111
in engineering education, 151–152, Women
158–159 benefits of engineering instruction
engineering instruction in, 32–33, in math and science achievement,
158–159 53–54
goals, 18 curricula design to promote
increased technological literacy as result engineering among, 101–103, 160
of engineering instruction, 60–62 in engineering workforce, 10, 34, 44
international comparison, 118 interest in engineering careers, 58–59
principles of engineering education limitations of current research on
and, 5 engineering education, 63–64
scope, 17, 18, 19 recommendations for curricula design,
teachers, 61 160
See also STEM education Woodward, Calvin M., 31–32
Tech Tally: Approaches to Assessing A World in Motion, 77–78, 79, 81, 83, 85,
Technological Literacy, 62 87, 89–90, 92, 93, 98, 101–102
TERC, 111
Texarkana Independent School District,
173–175 Y
Texas A&M University, 173–175
Young Scientist Series, 81, 83–84, 90, 99