The Mini-Magnetospheric Plasma Propulsion (M2P2) system, proposed by Robert Winglee and John Slough of the University of Washington, was funded in 1998 as a Phase I effort followed by a Phase II effort in 1999 (Figure F-1). M2P2 is a revolutionary means for spacecraft propulsion that efficiently utilized the energy from space plasmas to accelerate payloads to much higher speeds than can be attained by present chemical oxidizing propulsion systems.1,2 The system utilized an innovative configuration of existing technology based on well-established principles of plasma physics. It offered the potential of feasibly providing cheap, fast propulsion that could power an Interstellar Probe, as well as powering large payloads that may be required for a crewed mission to Mars.
The M2P2 system utilized low-energy plasma to transport or inflate a magnetic field beyond the typical scale lengths that can be supported by a standard solenoid magnetic field coil. In space, the inflated magnetic field would be used to reflect high-speed (400 to 1000 km/s) solar wind particles, thereby attaining an unprecedented acceleration for a power input of only a few kilowatts. Initial estimates were made for a minimum system that would provide a thrust of about 3 Newton continuous (0.6 MW continuous) power at a specific impulse of 104 to 105s, producing an increase in speed of about 30 km/s in a period of 3 months. As part of the NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts (NIAC) Phase I effort, several laboratory-scale models were developed and tested to

FIGURE F-1 Mini-Magnetospheric Plasma Propulsion concept. SOURCE : Courtesy of Robert M. Winglee, University of Washington.
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 65
F
Three NIAC Phase II Projects Infused into NASA’s Long-Term Plans
MINI-MAGNETOSPHERIC PLASMA PROPULSION
Project of Robert M. Winglee, University of Washington
The Mini-Magnetospheric Plasma Propulsion (M2P2) system, proposed by Robert Winglee and
John Slough of the University of Washington, was funded in 1998 as a Phase I effort followed by a Phase
II effort in 1999 (Figure F-1). M2P2 is a revolutionary means for spacecraft propulsion that efficiently
utilized the energy from space plasmas to accelerate payloads to much higher speeds than can be attained
by present chemical oxidizing propulsion systems.1,2 The system utilized an innovative configuration of
existing technology based on well-established principles of plasma physics. It offered the potential of
feasibly providing cheap, fast propulsion that could power an Interstellar Probe, as well as powering large
payloads that may be required for a crewed mission to Mars.
The M2P2 system utilized low-
energy plasma to transport or inflate a
magnetic field beyond the typical scale
lengths that can be supported by a standard
solenoid magnetic field coil. In space, the
inflated magnetic field would be used to
reflect high-speed (400 to 1000 km/s) solar
wind particles, thereby attaining an
unprecedented acceleration for a power input
of only a few kilowatts. Initial estimates
were made for a minimum system that would
provide a thrust of about 3 Newton
continuous (0.6 MW continuous) power at a
specific impulse of 104 to 105 s, producing an
increase in speed of about 30 km/s in a
period of 3 months. As part of the NASA FIGURE F-1 Mini-Magnetospheric Plasma Propulsion
Institute for Advanced Concepts (NIAC) concept. SOURCE : Courtesy of Robert M. Winglee,
Phase I effort, several laboratory-scale University of Washington.
models were developed and tested to
1
R. Winglee, J. Slough, T. Ziemba, and A. Goodson, Mini-magnetospheric plasma propulsion: Tapping the
energy of the solar wind for spacecraft propulsion, Journal of Geophysical Research 105(20):833, 2000.
2
R.M. Winglee, J. Slough, T. Ziemba, and A. Goodson, Mini-magnetospheric plasma propulsion: High speed
propulsion sailing the solar wind, p. 962 in 2000 Space Technology and Applications International Forum, M.S. El-
Genk, ed. CP504. American Institute of Physics, College Park, Md., 2000.
65
OCR for page 65
FIGURE F-2 Optical emissions from an injected neutral puff into the plasma. SOURCE: Courtesy of
Robert M. Winglee, University of Washington.
improve understanding of the proposed magnetic inflation process and to confirm models of the effect.3,4
These tests included that measurements of the plasma parameters at the helicon source and at the
magnetic equator and perturbations in the magnetic field caused by plasma injection along dipole field
lines. The tests demonstrated plasma confinement by the M2P2 followed classical linear scaling up to the
point where wall effects became important, and the tests demonstrated plasma inflation. This finding was
instrumental in leading to NASA evaluation and testing in a much larger chamber.
The Phase I effort developed extensive models for the effect. This modeling was based on the
fluid equations for plasmas, but the equations for conservation of mass and energy were combined in a
multifluid treatment. This is more complex than traditional MHD modeling, which combines the
equations into a single-fluid treatment. The multifluid approach required that the dynamics of the
electrons and the different ions species be kept separate. The modeling was detailed and led to the
amount of solar wind deflection with dipole tilt and the total force imparted onto the M2P2. On the basis
of these detailed calculations and the development of a laboratory prototype, a Phase II award was made.
As part of the NIAC Phase II project, a simulation model5,6 was developed where the magnetic
field was represented by either a point dipole or a finite width solenoid and studies were performed to
resolve processes occurring in close proximity to the magnet. The modeling was complicated by the
physics of wall interactions, observed in the test program, that cause mirror currents, sputtering, and
plasma sheaths. These effects were not incorporated into the model due to computational limitations.
Despite those limitations, both the modeling and the tests in a 1-m-diameter chamber gave evidence that
the M2P2 prototype had proven transport of magnetic flux. Figure F-2 shows quenching of the plasma
initially followed by expansion of the closed field lines. The emission extends both downward and
further into the chamber as the models predict.
These initial NIAC Phase II tests led to further testing at MSFC in an 18 ft x 32 ft vertical
vacuum chamber and used a plasma source from the SEPAC program for comparisons with the M2P2
3
R.M. Winglee, T. Ziemba, J. Slough, P. Euripides, and D. Gallagher, Laboratory testing of Mini-
Magnetospheric Plasma Propulsion prototype, p. 407 in 2001 Space Technology and Applications International
Forum, M.S. El-Genk, ed., CP552, American Institute of Physics, College Park, Md., 2001.
4
T. Ziemba, R.M. Winglee, and P. Euripides, Parameterization of the laboratory performance of the Mini-
Magnetospheric Plasma Propulsion (M2P2) prototype, 27th International Electric Propulsion Conference, October
15-19, 2001.
5
R. Winglee, T. Ziemba, P. Euripides, and J. Slough, Computer modeling of the laboratory testing of Mini-
Magnetospheric Plasma Propulsion (M2P2), International Electric Propulsion Conference Proceedings, October
14-19, 2001.
6
R. Winglee, T. Ziemba, P. Euripides, and J. Slough, Computer modeling of the laboratory testing of Mini-
Magnetospheric Plasma Propulsion (M2P2), International Electric Propulsion Conference Proceedings, October
14-19, 2001.
66
OCR for page 65
helicon source.7 Figure F-3 shows density contours when the
SEPAC is operated by itself and when the M2P2 operates in
conjunction with SEPAC. The plasma plume is substantially
thickened both horizontally as well as vertically. Most
surprisingly, the plasma plume is affected all the way in to
close proximity of the plasma source. Modeling confirmed
that this deflection of the external plasma is associated with
the inflation of the mini-magnetosphere.
Additional tests and modeling confirmed that M2P2
led to expansion of the magnetic field to several tens of
magnetic radii. The tests also showed the existence of a
plasma depletion layer between the SEPAC and M2P2
plasmas. This gap is analogous to the magnetopause of Earth
where there is deflection of solar wind by the terrestrial
magnetosphere. Its persistence in the experiment indicates
that the mini-magnetosphere is stable over long periods. Other
data confirmed that the plasma within the mini-magnetosphere
was well confined and that continued plasma production leads
to an increasing buildup of the mini-magnetosphere.
These experiments were able to quantify the FIGURE F-3 Density contours
performance of the prototype through comparative studies of showing inflation with the M2P2.
SOURCE: Courtesy of Robert M.
the laboratory test results with the simulation results. The
Winglee, University of Washington.
results showed that the transport of flux within the mini-
magnetosphere had a very distinctive signature, where the flux
inside the magnetosphere declined and the flux outside the initial closed region of the vacuum dipole
increased. As flux was transported outward, both the simulations and the observations showed a pileup of
the terrestrial magnetic field. The perturbations observed were small at only ~1 G, but this change in
magnetic field was sufficient to drive the field lines into the walls of the laboratory chambers that are
available. In addition, both the simulations and the experimental results showed that this same type of
magnetic field perturbation was able to deflect plasma at large distances and produce observable effects
all the way into the throat of an external plasma source. These results were all strong indicators that the
inflation of a mini-magnetosphere was achieved and that the closed magnetic field geometry of M2P2
provides an efficient means for deflecting external plasma winds at much greater distances than could be
accomplished by a magnet alone. Inflation and deflection are the key tenants of the M2P2 system, and
the experimental confirmation of the simulation results in the laboratory provided strong evidence that the
high thrust levels (1-3 N) reported in the original description should be achievable for low energy input
(~500 kW) and low propellant consumption (<1 kg/day). Further testing to measure the thrust levels
attainable by the prototype, however, did not confirm measurable thrust.
In the 2001 to 2002 time frame, the M2P2 concept was considered as a viable, emerging
technology by the NASA Decadal Planning Team and the NASA Exploration Team. Within NASA,
these teams were created to generate and assess innovative concepts for NASA senior leadership that
allowed new approaches to human and robotic space exploration. Specifically, these teams were
chartered to develop options that could achieve major scientific goals over the subsequent 20 years using
advanced technologies and could take advantage of the capabilities that astronauts made available on site.
External to NIAC, the M2P2 was funded by various NASA organizations to continue experiments
confirming computer models as noted above. Continued development of a high-powered helicon
component and collaboration between the JSC VASIMR program and the M2P2 program was
7
R.M. Winglee, T. Ziemba, J. Slough, P. Euripides, D. Gallagher, P. Craven, W. Tomlinson, J. Cravens, and J.
Burch, Large scale laboratory testing of Mini-Magnetospheric Plasma Propulsion (M2P2)⎯Enabling technology for
planetary exploration, 12th Annual Advanced Space Propulsion Workshop Proceedings, April 3-5, 2001.
67
OCR for page 65
established. Through peer review, the M2P2 effort was deemed highly innovative and technically
competent. This research effort created considerable interest within and external to NASA. The NIAC
Phase II implementation was professional and the M2P2 team was focused on demonstrating the
feasibility of this advanced concept to NASA. In 2002, a review panel that included plasma experts
concluded there were additional unresolved technical issues that centered around magnet field strengths,
mass, and power requirements. While partially addressed by the M2P2 team,8 this work came to a
stop due to changing priorities within the agency.
MICRO-ARCSECOND X-RAY IMAGING MISSION
Project of Webster Cash, University of Colorado, Boulder
In 1999, University of Colorado Professor Webster Cash was awarded a NIAC Phase I award for
his proposal entitled “X-Ray Interferometry: Ultimate Astronomical Imaging.” The proposed concept
was for an array of grazing-incidence x-ray mirrors on free-flying spacecraft, coordinated to focus the x
rays on a set of beam-combining and detector spacecraft. The Phase I work validated the basic concept
and suggested a method to test the predicted performance in the laboratory. Initial tests of a prototype x-
ray interferometer were performed with additional NASA support at the Marshall Space Flight Center and
demonstrated an angular resolution of 100 milli-arcseconds, a factor-of-5 improvement over the best
previous results. In 2000 Cash’s “X-ray Interferometry” proposal was selected by NIAC for Phase II
funding. Cash and his colleagues published their x-ray interferometry test results in a September 2000,
issue of Nature.9 Also that year NASA incorporated this concept into its strategic plans. Dubbed
MAXIM, the Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission, this concept appeared in the National Research
Council’s (NRC’s) Decadal Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics released in 2000,10 which identified
x-ray interferometry for $60 million in funding over the following 10 years.
The technique of interferometric imaging, combining light from a dispersed array of collector
optics onto a single focal plane (see Figure F-4), has been exploited at RF wavelengths (e.g., the Very
Large Array and Very Long Baseline Array for radio astronomy) and is being implemented for optical
telescopes (e.g., the European Southern Observatory Very Large Telescope). Properly implemented, the
technique yields angular resolution inversely proportional to the distance between the collectors, so that
extremely high resolution can be obtained by placing the collectors very far apart.
Cash’s NIAC Phase II x-ray interferometry proposal was an extension of this concept to x-ray
wavelengths. By choosing extremely bright x-ray objects to image, he identified an ideal combination of
subject and scientific motivation: to image the event horizon of a black hole. The technical credibility of
the concept was clear, but the technical implementation remains extremely challenging, in part because of
the difficulty of maintaining path length control to a small fraction of the very small x-ray wavelength.
However, the fact that the laboratory demonstration of this capability was published in Nature testifies to
the significance of this accomplishment.
8
R.M. Winglee, P. Euripides, T. Ziemba, J. Slough, and L. Giersch, Simulation of Mini-Magnetospheric
Plasma Production (M2P2) interacting with an external plasma wind, AIAA Paper No. 2003-5224, July 2003.
9
W. Cash, A. Shipley, S. Osterman, and M. Joy, Laboratory detection of x-ray fringes with a grazing-incidence
interferometer, Nature 407:160-162, doi:10.1038/35025009Letter.
10
National Research Council, Astronomy and Astrophysics in the New Millennium, National Academy Press,
Washington, D.C., 2001.
68
OCR for page 65
FIGURE F-4 The x-ray interferometry imaging mission concept successfully proposed in
1999 by Webster Cash for a Phase I NIAC study. SOURCE: NASA Institute for Advanced
Concepts, Annual Report (2nd; 1999-2000), Atlanta, Ga., 2000, p. 23. Courtesy of Webster
Cash, University of Colorado.
FIGURE F-5 The x-ray interferometry approach to imaging the event horizon of a black
hole is one of the methods being pursued by NASA for its Black Hole Imager mission.
SOURCE: NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts, 5th Annual Report (2002-2003),
Atlanta, Ga., 2003, p. 7. Courtesy of Webster Cash, University of Colorado.
69
OCR for page 65
NASA has continued support to further define and develop high-resolution x-ray imaging
missions, and Cash’s interferometry concept has remained among the leading contenders.11 The MAXIM
Pathfinder mission was the subject of a NASA-supported “Integrated Mission Design Center” study in
2002. In 2004, MAXIM was selected as one of the NASA Vision Mission studies for advanced
definition. Today, the technology of x-ray interferometry that was the subject of the initial NIAC study is
the first (see Figure F-5) of three competing methods that NASA is pursuing under its Black Hole Imager
(BHI) mission. The BHI team presented a white paper to the NRC’s Astro2010: The Astronomy and
Astrophysics Decadal Survey of the NRC and expects the BHI to be identified as one of the compelling
astrophysics missions for NASA to pursue in the near future.
NEW WORLDS OBSERVER
Project of Webster Cash, University of Colorado, Boulder
In 2004 University of Colorado Professor Webster Cash submitted a proposal for a NIAC Phase I
study of a concept called the New Worlds Imager (Figure F-6); its objective was to study a variety of
pinhole camera and occulting mask designs to enable imaging of planetary systems around other stars.
As documented in the final Phase I study report, dated March 31, 2005, Cash and his collaborators
realized that occulting masks had significant performance advantages, and they identified an occulter
design that could meet the contrast requirements of the exoplanet exploration missions under active
consideration by NASA as the Terrestrial Planet Finder and by ESA as Darwin.
The basic concept is an occulting mask (to first order, an opaque disk) with an edge shaped like
petals of a flower (see Figure F-5), but precisely designed to cancel the diffraction effects that famously
result in a local intensity maximum along the axis of the occulter at the center of the expected shadow, the
Arago Spot.
Following the completion of the Phase I effort, in May 2005, NIAC selected a proposal for Phase
II, now called the New Worlds Imager. The ultimate implementation envisioned was for a five-spacecraft
constellation consisting of two sets of starshade and telescope combinations, plus a fifth spacecraft
carrying a beam combiner/interferometer. This NIAC-funded work was described in an article featured
on the cover of the July 6, 2006, issue of Nature.12 During Phase II, Cash and his collaborators
demonstrated suppression performance <10-7 in a laboratory test of a miniature, 16-petal occulter. Both
the Nature publication and the laboratory demonstration testify to the significance and technical
competence of the basic concept and the research supported by NIAC.
With the completion of the NIAC Phase II study, NASA has provided significant additional
support for Cash’s occulter concept, and it is now one of the competitive concepts for the Terrestrial
Planet Finder program. In addition, both Ball Aerospace Corporation and Northrop Grumman
Corporation have made internal investments to further develop the concept in conjunction with Cash and
the rest of his team. According to NIAC, “In February 2006, NASA/GSFC [Goddard Space Flight
Center] announced its intent to issue a sole-source request for proposal to Northrop Grumman Corp. and
Ball Aerospace Corp. for the further development of the New Worlds Imager (NWI).”13 NASA/GSFC
continues to support this concept with funding. More than 40 papers have been published between 2004
and 2008 by Cash and his colleagues on this technique and its applications.
In February 2008, NASA announced that a team led by Cash had been awarded $1 million for the
New Worlds Observer as one of its Astrophysics Strategic Missions Concept Studies (ASMCS). The
11
See http://maxim.gsfc.nasa.gov.
12
W. Cash, Detection of Earth-like planets around nearby stars using a petal-shaped occulter, Nature 442:6,
2006.
13
NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts, Annual Report (8th; 2005-2006), Atlanta, Ga., 2006, p. 23.
70
OCR for page 65
FIGURE F-6 An artist’s rendering of the New Worlds Observer concept for imaging a distant planetary system.
Light from the central star is blocked by a large external occulting disk that is shaped to control diffraction of the
starlight around the occulter. A telescope placed in the right location can image the surrounding planetary
system without glare from the central star. SOURCE: Webster Cash, The New Worlds Imager, Final Report to
the NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts for Phase I Study, NIAC Phase I study report, 2005. Courtesy of
Webster Cash, University of Colorado.
study now has been completed and the final report is available.14 The results of this study will be used to
prepare the New Worlds Observer mission concept for the NRC’s Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal
Survey. In conjunction with the ASMCS study, NASA convened a Technical Assessment Review (TAR)
panel for the New Worlds Observer mission concept. The NASA TAR report is part of the ASMCS
document package. The TAR recommendations are being used to motivate further NASA investment and
to prepare the technologies necessary for a successful New Worlds Observer mission.
14
Webster Cash, principal investigator, Final Report, Astrophysics Strategic Mission Concept Study, The New
Worlds Observer, April 24, 2009.
71