National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

PAPERBACK
price:$55.00
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

School Meals: Building Blocks for Healthy Children (2010)
Food and Nutrition Board (FNB)

Citation Manager

. "Appendix H: Uses of MyPyramid Food Groups and the MyPyramid Spreadsheet." School Meals: Building Blocks for Healthy Children. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
276
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


School Meals: Building Blocks for Healthy Children

BOX H-1

Method Used to Design and Test Food Patterns for the Meal Requirements As Offered

Nutrient Composites


These spreadsheets primarily use the 2005 MyPyramid nutrient composites (Marcoe et al., 2006) to estimate the energy and nutrient content that would be provided by possible meal patterns for breakfast and lunch.

In developing the spreadsheet, staff modified the nutrient composites and/or food groups as listed below:

  1. The vitamin A content for the milk group is the value for low-fat (vitamin A-fortified) milk rather than whole milk. The original composite used the vitamin A value for whole milk.

  2. Separate rows were added for low-fat cheese and low-fat flavored yogurt. Although cheese and yogurt are part of the milk group in MyPyramid, the nutrient composite reflects the nutrient content of fat-free milk. A further complication was that cheese and yogurt are counted as members of the meat and meat alternates group in current specifications for school meals. Having separate rows in the spreadsheet for these two dairy foods enabled the committee to obtain quick nutrient estimates for a variety of food patterns that include these dairy foods. Of interest was the estimated nutrient content of patterns that involve partial and complete substitution of the dairy foods for foods in the MyPyramid meat and beans group.

Food Pattern Development and Testing


To determine initial breakfast and lunch patterns based on MyPyramid, the method was to multiply the amount for each food group specified by MyPyramid (for each calorie level—1,800, 2,000, and 2,400) by the midpoint of the calorie range for the meal (21.5% for breakfast, 32% for lunch), as shown below in Table H-3.

To account for vegetable subgroups that are specified in MyPyramid on a weekly rather than a daily basis, the subgroup calculated the amounts as cups per 5-day school week at lunch. Because it is uncommon for a majority of U.S. schoolchildren to consume vegetables at breakfast (with a few exceptions, such as hash-brown potatoes), the committee agreed to exclude vegetables from the breakfast patterns that were tested.

The amounts shown in Table H-3 were adjusted up or down if necessary to achieve practical serving amounts. For example, instead of specifying 0.8 cups of vegetable per day, ¾ cup or 1 cup would be specified.

At breakfast, since vegetables had been omitted, the committee tested patterns with and without additional fruit to examine the differences in the content of calories, some vitamins, potassium, and fiber.

Tentative allocations were made for added sugars and saturated fat considering the number of calories remaining (discretionary calories) and the desire to allow for some low-fat (1%) milk and flavored fat-free milk. (The added sugars and/or the fat in flavored low-fat yogurt and low-fat cheese are included in the composites for those foods.) These allocations were made for test purposes only. They were not intended to be part of the food pattern.

Page
276
Front Matter (R1-R14)
Summary (1-18)
1 Introduction and Background (19-32)
2 Foundation for Revising Nutrition Standards and Meal Requirements (33-46)
3 Schoolchildren's Food and Nutrient Intakes and Related Health Concerns (47-68)
4 Process for Developing the Nutrient Targets (69-90)
5 Process for Developing the Meal Requirements (91-106)
6 Iterations - Achieving the Best Balance of Nutrition, Student Acceptance, Practicality, and Cost (107-114)
7 Recommendations for Nutrient Targets and Meal Requirements for School Meals (115-130)
8 Food Cost Implications and Market Effects (131-154)
9 Projected Impact of the Recommended Nutrient Targets and Meal Requirements (155-178)
10 Implementation, Evaluation, and Research (179-208)
11 References (209-220)
Appendix A: Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Glossary (221-228)
Appendix B: Biographical Sketches of Committee Members (229-236)
Appendix C: Critical Issues for Consideration by the Committee on Nutrition Standards for National School Lunch and Breakfast Programs, as Submitted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (237-244)
Appendix D: January 2009 Workshop Agenda and Summary of Public Comments (245-254)
Appendix E: Standards for the Current Food- and Nutrient-Based Menu Planning Approaches (255-258)
Appendix F: Data Used to Calculate Estimated Energy Requirements (259-262)
Appendix G: Data Tables Containing Examples of New SNDA-III Analyses (263-268)
Appendix H: Uses of MyPyramid Food Groups and the MyPyramid Spreadsheet (269-284)
Appendix I: Dietary Intake Data and Calculation of the Target Median Intake for Iron (285-292)
Appendix J: Target Median Intake (TMI) Tables (293-296)
Appendix K: Use of the School Meals Menu Analysis Program (297-304)
Appendix L: Baseline Menus (305-330)
Appendix M: Sample Menus (331-362)
Appendix N: Evidence Considered Related to the Definition for Whole Grain-Rich Foods (363-366)
Appendix O: Comparison of Recommended Nutrient Targets to Various Nutrition Standards for School-Aged Children (367-372)
Appendix P: Comparison of *Dietary Guidelines for Americans* with Recommended Meal Requirements (373-378)
Appendix Q: Regulations Related to the Sodium Content of Foods Labeled "Healthy" (379-380)