Click for next page ( 96

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001

Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 95
Appendix A Statement of Task An ad hoc committee will examine the current state of biological research in the United States and recommend how best to capitalize on recent techno- logical and scientific advances that have allowed biologists to integrate biologi- cal research findings, collect and interpret vastly increased amounts of data, and predict the behavior of complex biological systems. Among the questions the committee may address are: • What fundamental biological questions are ready for major advances in understanding? What would be the practical result of answering those ques- tions? How could answers to those questions lead to high impact applications in the near future? • How can a fundamental understanding of living systems reduce uncer- tainty about the future of life on earth, improve human health and welfare, and lead to the wise stewardship of our planet? Can the consequences of envi- ronmental, stochastic or genetic changes be understood in terms of the related properties of robustness and fragility inherent in all biological systems? • How can federal agencies more effectively leverage their investments in biological research and education to address complex problems across scales of analysis from basic to applied? In what areas would near term investment be most likely to lead to substantial long-term benefit and a strong, competitive advantage for the United States? Are there high-risk, high pay-off areas that deserve serious consideration for seed funding? • Are new funding mechanisms needed to encourage and support cross- cutting, interdisciplinary or applied biology research? • What are the major impediments to achieving a newly integrated biology? 95

OCR for page 95
96 APPENDIX A • What are the implications of a newly integrated biology for infrastructural needs? How should infrastructural priorities be identified and planned for? • What are the implications for the life sciences research culture of a newly integrated approach to biology? How can physicists, chemists, mathema- ticians and engineers be encouraged to help build a wider biological enterprise with the scope and expertise to address a broad range of scientific and societal problems? • Are changes needed in biology education—to ensure that biology majors are equipped to work across traditional subdisciplinary boundaries, to provide biology curricula that equip physical scientists and engineers to take advantage of advances in biological science, and to provide nonscientists with a level of biological understanding that gives them an informed voice regard- ing relevant policy proposals? Are alternative degree programs needed or can biology departments be organized to attract and train students able to work comfortably across disciplinary boundaries? The subgroup of the committee will organize a Biology Summit to ­garner input from a broad spectrum of stakeholders—government and private agencies that fund biological research, the biotech and pharmaceutical industries, uni- versities and medical schools—to consider barriers to progress and to highlight exciting new areas of research that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The Summit’s proceedings will be published as a separate, type-3 workshop report. In a subsequent consensus report, the committee will recommend actions that federal policy makers can take to ensure that the United States takes the lead in the emergence of a biological science that will support a higher level of confidence in our understanding of living systems, thus reducing uncertainty about the future, contributing to innovative solutions for practical problems, and allowing the development of robust and sustainable new technologies. The committee will not make specific budgetary or government organizational recommendations.