Questions? Call 800-624-6242 About | Ordering | New Menu | Items in cart [0] SEARCH

PAPERBACK price:$49.95 add to cart Rights & Permissions Free PDF Access Sign in to download PDF book and chapters Free Resources PDF SUMMARY PDF Report Brief Display this book on your site! Related Titles Adapting to the Impacts of Climate Change A National Strategy for Advancing Climate Modeling Other Related Titles Advancing the Science of Climate Change (2010) Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate (BASC) Citation Manager Export the bibliographic data for this book in your chosen format Web Search Builder Use this book's key terms to search within this book, across our collection, or across the Web. Skim This Chapter Skim this chapter and use this chapter's key terms to search within this book. Reference Finder Paste in your own text to find books that relate to your topic. Citation Manager . "Appendix D: Uncertainty Terminology." Advancing the Science of Climate Change. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2010. Please select a format: Page 491   E-mail Share on facebook Facebook Share on delicious Delicious Share on stumbleupon Stumble Share on twitter Twitter More Sharing ServicesMore The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy. APPENDIX D Uncertainty Terminology In assessing the state of knowledge about climate change, scientists have developed a careful terminology for expressing uncertainties around both statements of fact about a current situation (for example, “most observed warming can be attributed to human action”) and statements about the likelihoods of various future outcomes (for example, “sea level could rise by several feet by 2100”). The IPCC, in particular, has devoted serious debate and discussion to appropriate ways of expressing and dealing with uncertainty around such statements (Moss and Schneider, 2000), and all recent IPCC assessments have adopted a set of terminology to describe the degree of confidence in conclusions (see, e.g., Manning et al., 2004). In estimating confidence, scientific assessment teams draw on information about “the strength and consistency of the observed evidence, the range and consistency of model projections, the reliability of particular models as tested by various methods, and, most importantly, the body of work addressed in earlier synthesis and assessment reports” (USGCRP, 2009). It is easier to employ precise uncertainty language in situations where conclusions are based on extensive quantitative data or models than in areas where data are less extensive, important research is qualitative, or models are in an earlier stage of development. Statements about the future are also generally more uncertain than statements of fact about observed changes or current trends. Table D.1 shows the language adopted by the IPCC to describe confidence about facts or the likelihood that a statement is accurate. The U.S. Global Change Research Program’s recent assessment report on Global Climate Change Impacts on the United States(USGCRP, 2009) uses similar language. In this report, Advancing the Science of Climate Change, when we draw directly on the statements of the formal national and international assessments, we adopt their terminology to describe uncertainty. However, because of the more concise nature and intent of this report, we do not attempt to quantify confidence and certainty about every statement of the science. Page 491 Front Matter (R1-R22) Summary (1-16) Part I (17-18) 1 Introduction: Science for Understanding and Responding to Climate Change (19-26) 2 What We Know About Climate Change and Its Interactions with People and Ecosystems (27-82) 3 A New Era of Climate Change Research (83-90) 4 Integrative Themes for Climate Change Research (91-150) 5 Recommendations for Meeting the Challenge of Climate Change Research (151-180) Part II: Technical Chapters (181-182) 6 Changes in the Climate System (183-234) 7 Sea Level Rise and the Coastal Environment (235-256) 8 Freshwater Resources (257-270) 9 Ecosystems, Ecosystem Services, and Biodiversity (271-290) 10 Agriculture, Fisheries, and Food Production (291-308) 11 Public Health (309-322) 12 Cities and the Built Environment (323-332) 13 Transportation (333-348) 14 Energy Supply and Use (349-376) 15 Solar Radiation Management (377-388) 16 National and Human Security (389-400) 17 Designing, Implementing, and Evaluating Climate Policies (401-420) References (421-474) Appendix A: America's Climate Choices: Membership Lists (475-478) Appendix B: Panel on Advancing the Science of Climate Change: Statement of Task (479-480) Appendix C: Panel on Advancing the Science of Climate Change: Biographical Sketches (481-490) Appendix D: Uncertainty Terminology (491-492) Appendix E: The United States Global Change Research Program (493-496) Appendix F: Geoengineering Options to Respond to Climate Change: Steps to Establish a Research Agenda (497-500) Appendix G: Acronyms and Initialisms (501-504)

Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 491
Advancing the Science of Climate Change APPENDIX D Uncertainty Terminology In assessing the state of knowledge about climate change, scientists have developed a careful terminology for expressing uncertainties around both statements of fact about a current situation (for example, “most observed warming can be attributed to human action”) and statements about the likelihoods of various future outcomes (for example, “sea level could rise by several feet by 2100”). The IPCC, in particular, has devoted serious debate and discussion to appropriate ways of expressing and dealing with uncertainty around such statements (Moss and Schneider, 2000), and all recent IPCC assessments have adopted a set of terminology to describe the degree of confidence in conclusions (see, e.g., Manning et al., 2004). In estimating confidence, scientific assessment teams draw on information about “the strength and consistency of the observed evidence, the range and consistency of model projections, the reliability of particular models as tested by various methods, and, most importantly, the body of work addressed in earlier synthesis and assessment reports” (USGCRP, 2009). It is easier to employ precise uncertainty language in situations where conclusions are based on extensive quantitative data or models than in areas where data are less extensive, important research is qualitative, or models are in an earlier stage of development. Statements about the future are also generally more uncertain than statements of fact about observed changes or current trends. Table D.1 shows the language adopted by the IPCC to describe confidence about facts or the likelihood that a statement is accurate. The U.S. Global Change Research Program’s recent assessment report on Global Climate Change Impacts on the United States(USGCRP, 2009) uses similar language. In this report, Advancing the Science of Climate Change, when we draw directly on the statements of the formal national and international assessments, we adopt their terminology to describe uncertainty. However, because of the more concise nature and intent of this report, we do not attempt to quantify confidence and certainty about every statement of the science.

OCR for page 492
Advancing the Science of Climate Change TABLE D.1 Language Adopted by the IPCC to Describe Confidence About Facts or the Likelihood of an Outcome Terminology for Describing Confidence About Facts Very high confidence At least 9 out of 10 chance of being correct High confidence About 8 out of 10 chance Medium confidence About 5 out of 10 chance Low confidence About 2 out of 10 chance Very low confidence Less than 1 out of 10 chance Terminology for Describing Likelihood of an Outcome Virtually certain More than 99 chances out of 100 Extremely likely More than 95 chances out of 100 Very likely More than 90 chances out of 100 Likely More than 65 chances out of 100 More likely than not More than 50 chances out of 100 About as likely as not Between 33 and 66 chances out of 100 Unlikely Less than 33 chances out of 100 Very unlikely Less than 10 chances out of 100 Extremely unlikely Less than 5 chances out of 100 Exceptionally unlikely Less than 1 chance out of 100 SOURCE: IPCC (2007a).