National Academies Press: OpenBook

Engineering Curricula: Understanding the Design Space and Exploiting the Opportunities: Summary of a Workshop (2010)

Chapter: Appendix C: Biosketches of Organizing Committee Members and Rapporteur

« Previous: Appendix B: Workshop Participants
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C: Biosketches of Organizing Committee Members and Rapporteur." National Academy of Engineering. 2010. Engineering Curricula: Understanding the Design Space and Exploiting the Opportunities: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12824.
×

C
Biosketches of Organizing Committee Members and Rapporteur

Eli Fromm, Chair, is the Roy A. Brothers University Professor, Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, and Director of the Center for Educational Research in the College of Engineering of Drexel University. He has been Principal Investigator of a number of bioengineering research projects involving implantable transmitters and sensors, Principal Investigator of the Drexel E4 educational reform project and of the Gateway Engineering Education Coalition. His academic leadership positions have included Vice President for Educational Research, Vice Provost for Research and Graduate Studies, and interim Dean of Engineering at Drexel. He has also held positions with the General Electric and Dupont companies, the Science Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives as a staff member and Congressional Fellow, Program Director at NSF, and Visiting Scientist with the Legislative Office of Research Liaison of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives. He is a fellow of the IEEE and the AIMBE, a recipient of awards and honors from IEEE, ASEE, ABET, Smithsonian Institution, Drexel University, and is the inaugural recipient of the Bernard M. Gordon Prize from the National Academy of Engineering. Professor Fromm was elected to the National Academy of Engineering in 2004


Woodie C. Flowers is the Pappalardo Professor Emeritus of mechanical engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. His specialty areas are engineering design and product development. His current research includes work on the creative design process and product development systems. He helped create MIT’s renowned course “Introduction to Design.” Flowers received national recognition in his role as host for the PBS television series Scientific American Frontiers from 1990 to 1993 and received a New England EMMY Award for a special PBS program on design. He is a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and recipient of an Honorary Doctor of Humane Letters from Daniel Webster College. He was recently selected to receive a Public Service Medal from NASA and the Tower Medallion from Louisiana Tech University. At MIT, he is a MacVicar Faculty Fellow, an honor bestowed for extraordinary contributions to undergraduate education. He was also the inaugural recipient of the Woodie Flowers Award by FIRST, a national organization that promotes youth involvement in science and technology. Currently, Flowers is a director of four companies and is on the board of Technology Review magazine. He is a member of the Lemelson-MIT Prize Board Executive Committee, is National Advisor and Vice Chairman of the Executive Advisory Board for FIRST; and is a member of the Historical Commission in Weston, Massachusetts. Professor Flowers was elected to the National Academy of Engineering in 1994.


Sherra Kerns is F. W. Olin Distinguished Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, founding Vice President for Innovation and Research at the F. W. Olin College. Kerns came to Olin from Vanderbilt University, where she was a senior faculty member and held various posts, including Chair of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Director of the multi-disciplinary, multi-institutional

Suggested Citation:"Appendix C: Biosketches of Organizing Committee Members and Rapporteur." National Academy of Engineering. 2010. Engineering Curricula: Understanding the Design Space and Exploiting the Opportunities: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12824.
×

University Consortium for Research on Electronics in Space. A Fellow of the IEEE, Kerns is the recipient of IEEE’s prestigious Millennium Medal and the IEEE Education Society's Harriet B. Rigas Award. Kerns has also received many awards for outstanding undergraduate teaching, and has been very active nationally in promoting engineering education. She has been named to the Advisory Committee for the National Academy of Engineering’s Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education and the Steering Committee for the NAE Engineer of 2020 Phase II: Engineering Education in the New Century initiative. She is the Past President of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), the nation’s premier society for technical education and is a Fellow of the ASEE. She also serves as an Executive Committee member of the Engineering Accreditation Commission of ABET, the accreditation body for engineering programs in the U.S. At Olin College, she is pioneering a unique administrative position with responsibility for enhancing faculty intellectual vitality, providing opportunities for students to learn through discovery, and building a culture that rewards innovation and the taking of appropriate risks.


Lueny Morell is director of engineering education innovation at HP Labs. Her job entails working with the higher education community and leading academic institutions on everything from research and student recruitment to customer and government relations and policy advocacy. She is also involved in curriculum development, advising industry, facilitating accreditation initiatives, supporting student and faculty research, and philanthropic projects. Before joining HP in 2002, Professor Morell had a 24-year career at the University of Puerto Rico, where she held various positions, both at the Mayaguez Campus (UPRM) and the system level. A full professor of chemical engineering, she was director of the UPRM Research and Development Center, a member to the Academic Senate and Administrative Board, and special assistant to the chancellor and dean of engineering in charge of strategic alliances, new educational initiatives, and outcome assessment. Professor Morell also coordinated the ABET 2000 accreditation for UPRM. A licensed professional engineer and certified ABET evaluator, she has done professional consulting work and is a member of many professional and honorary societies, including Tau Beta Pi, Phi Kappa Phi, Sigma Xi, Alpha Delta Kappa, American Society of Electrical Engineers, and American Institute of Chemical Engineers. Professor Morell has more than 40 scientific and educational papers to her credit and has received many honors during her academic career.


Teri Reed-Rhoads is Assistant Dean of Engineering for Undergraduate Education and Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Purdue University. In addition, she is director of the institute for P-12 engineering research and learning (INSPIRE). Reed-Rhoads’ teaching interests include engineering statistics, quality engineering and introductory freshman engineering courses. Her research interests include statistics education, concept inventory development, assessment and evaluation of learning and programs, recruitment and retention topics, diversity, equity, and P-12 engineering education outreach. She has received funding from a number of National Science Foundation programs, the Department of Education, various foundations, and industry. She is an active participant in the American Society for Engineering Education, the American Educational Research Association, and the Institute of Electronics and

Suggested Citation:"Appendix C: Biosketches of Organizing Committee Members and Rapporteur." National Academy of Engineering. 2010. Engineering Curricula: Understanding the Design Space and Exploiting the Opportunities: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12824.
×

Electrical Engineers as well as being a member of the Institute of Industrial Engineers and the American Statistical Association.


Alan Tucker is Distinguished Teaching Professor and Undergraduate Director in the Department of Applied Mathematics at Stony Brook University. He has been at Stony Brook since 1970, serving as chair or undergraduate program director for over 30 years. His research specialty is graph theory. He has been active in a range of educational studies and reports by the Mathematical Association of America and American Mathematical Society, serving as project director in several. His links to engineering include membership on the Advisory Committee of the NAE Center for Advanced Study in Engineering Education and locally at Stony Brook serving as chair of the Executive Committee of the College of Engineering and Applied Sciences for the past 10 years.


Ryan C. Davison is a Christine Mirzayan Science and Technology Policy Fellow with the National Academies. He earned a PhD in behavioral neuroscience from the University of Alabama at Birmingham in May 2007. His graduate research implemented a sophisticated form of electrophysiology which allowed for the activity patterns of single neurons in non-anesthetized, behaving primates to be measured. As a post-doctoral Fellow at the Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, he characterized the visual system by implanting strain gauges and muscle force transducers in extraocular muscles in order to better understand the relationship between motor neuron firing rates and muscle contractile forces. His Fellowship with NAE allowed him to promote public awareness of critical science and engineering issues and learn a great deal about engineering education curricula. He is a voracious consumer of political information and currently pursuing a career in science education policy.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix C: Biosketches of Organizing Committee Members and Rapporteur." National Academy of Engineering. 2010. Engineering Curricula: Understanding the Design Space and Exploiting the Opportunities: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12824.
×
Page 24
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C: Biosketches of Organizing Committee Members and Rapporteur." National Academy of Engineering. 2010. Engineering Curricula: Understanding the Design Space and Exploiting the Opportunities: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12824.
×
Page 25
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C: Biosketches of Organizing Committee Members and Rapporteur." National Academy of Engineering. 2010. Engineering Curricula: Understanding the Design Space and Exploiting the Opportunities: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12824.
×
Page 26
Engineering Curricula: Understanding the Design Space and Exploiting the Opportunities: Summary of a Workshop Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $29.00 Buy Ebook | $23.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

In April 2009 a workshop was held to explore how engineering curricula could be enhanced to better prepare future engineers. The workshop, summarized in this volume, included individuals from industry, academia, government agencies, and professional societies.

During the workshop participants addressed the rationale for the scope and sequence of current engineering curricula, considering both the positive aspects as well as those aspects that have outlived their usefulness. Other topics of discussion included the potential to enhance engineering curricula through creative uses of instructional technologies; the importance of inquiry-based activities as well as authentic learning experiences grounded in real world contexts; and the opportunities provided by looking more deeply at what personal and professional outcomes result from studying engineering.

General themes that appeared to underlie the workshop attendees' discussions included desires to (a) restructure engineering curricula to focus on inductive teaching and learning, (b) apply integrated, just-in-time learning of relevant topics across STEM fields, and (c) make more extensive use and implementation of learning technologies. During breakout discussions, many additional suggestions were offered for means by which to facilitate curricular innovation.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!