National Academies Press: OpenBook

Selling the Nation's Helium Reserve (2010)

Chapter: Appendix E: Auction Types

« Previous: Appendix D: The Economics of a Typical Recycling System
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Auction Types." National Research Council. 2010. Selling the Nation's Helium Reserve. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12844.
×

Appendix E
Auction Types

According to Klemperer (2004) there are four basic types of auctions.1

  • Ascending bid, or English auction, in which bidders (or the seller) bid higher and higher until the highest bid wins the good. Bids can be submitted by open outcry or signal. Increasingly, however, such auctions are being held electronically;

  • The descending bid, or Dutch auction, in which the price is lowered until someone agrees to the price;

  • The first price, sealed-bid auction, in which the buyers put in secret sealed bids and the highest bidder wins the good at the bid price; and

  • The second price, sealed-bid auction, or Vickery auction, in which buyers put in sealed bids and the highest bidder wins the good at the second highest bid price.

An early theoretical result from auction theory is that under risk neutrality, independent values, free entry, and competitive bidding, the four mechanisms yield identical expected revenue and each bidder should bid his or her estimate of the true value for the object. If buyers are risk averse, expected revenues are higher for the ascending bid, but such a bid type attracts the fewest bidders. Furthermore, bidding may be used to signal colluding bidders. Thus in the helium market, where

1

Paul Klemperer, Auctions: Theory and Practice (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2004).

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Auction Types." National Research Council. 2010. Selling the Nation's Helium Reserve. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12844.
×

there are few bidders and each has significant market power, the ascending open auction is likely not the best choice. Sealed-bid auctions tend to attract the most players. Since it is easier to collude in a second price, sealed-bid auction, a first-price, sealed-bid auction is the best choice for helium sales. Such sales, however, would require open access to the Cliffside reserves or to swaps, and this access would require monitoring by BLM or some other regulatory body.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Auction Types." National Research Council. 2010. Selling the Nation's Helium Reserve. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12844.
×
Page 130
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Auction Types." National Research Council. 2010. Selling the Nation's Helium Reserve. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/12844.
×
Page 131
Next: Appendix F: Extraction Path Alternatives »
Selling the Nation's Helium Reserve Get This Book
×
 Selling the Nation's Helium Reserve
Buy Paperback | $47.00 Buy Ebook | $37.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Helium has long been the subject of public policy deliberation and management, largely because of its many strategic uses and its unusual source-it is a derived product of natural gas and its market has several anomalous characteristics. Shortly after sources of helium were discovered at the beginning of the last century, the U.S. government recognized helium's potential importance to the nation's interests and placed its production and availability under strict governmental control. In the 1960s, helium's strategic value in cold war efforts was reflected in policies that resulted in the accumulation of a large reserve of helium owned by the federal government. The latest manifestation of public policy is expressed in the Helium Privatization Act of 1996 (1996 12 Act), which directs that substantially all of the helium accumulated as a result of those earlier policies be sold off by 2015 at prices sufficient to repay the federal government for its outlays associated with the helium program.

The present volume assesses whether the interests of the United States have been well served by the 1996 Act and, in particular, whether selling off the helium reserve has had any adverse effect on U.S. scientific, technical, biomedical, and national security users of helium.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!