Click for next page ( 64


The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 63
References ________________________________________________________________________ Butterfoss, F. and M. Kegler. 2002. Toward a comprehensive understanding of community coalitions: Moving from practice to theory. Pp. 157-193 in Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research, R. DiClemente, R. Crosby, and M. Kegler, eds. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Homeland Security Institute. 2006. Heralding Unheard Voices: The Role of Faith-Based Organizations and Nongovernmental Organizations During Disasters. Washington, D.C.: Department of Homeland Security. Available at www.homelandsecurity.org/HsiReports/Herald_Unheard_Voices.pdf (accessed November 30, 2009), 124 pp. McCarthy, F. X., and N. Keegan. 2009. FEMA’s Pre-Disaster Mitigation Program: Overview and Issues. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. July 10. 25 pp. MMC (Multihazard Mitigation Council). 2005. Natural Hazard Mitigation Saves: An Independent Study to Assess the Future Savings from Mitigation Activities. Washington, DC: National Institute of Building Sciences, 19 pp. Norris, F. H., S. P. Stevens, B. Pfefferbaum, K. F. Whyche, and R. L. Pfefferbaum. 2008. Community resilience as a metaphor: Theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology 41(1-2):127-150. NRC (National Research Council). 2009. Applications of Social Network Analysis for Building Community Disaster Resilience. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 70 pp. Peacock, W.G., H. Kunreuther, W.H. Hooke, S.L. Cutter, S.E. Chang, and P.R. Berke. 2008. Toward a Resiliency and Vulnerability Observatory Network: RAVON. HRRC Reports: 08-02R. Available at www.nehrp.gov/pdf/RAVON.pdf (accessed December 16, 2009), 25 pp. Pulwarty, R.S., C. Simpson, and C.R. Nierenbeg. 2009. The Regional Integrated Sciences and Assessments (RISA) Program: Crafting Effective Assessments for the Long Haul. Pp. 367-390 in Integrated Regional Assessments: Challenges and Case Studies, C.G. Knight and J. Jager, eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 426 pp. 63

OCR for page 63
64 PRIVATE-PUBLIC SECTOR COLLABORATION FOR COMMUNITY DISASTER RESILIENCE Regan, B. L. 2009. Enhancing Emergency Preparedness and Response: Partnering with the Private Business Sector. Master’s thesis. Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, 89 pp. Raisch, W.G., and M. Statler. 2006. National Roundtable: Insurance Incentives for Corporate Preparedness. White paper presented to the International Center for Enterprise Preparedness at New York University. New York. Available at www.nyu.edu/intercep/businesscase/index.html (accessed December 2, 2009), 12 pp. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. 2008. National Response Framework. Washington, D.C.: Federal Emergency Management Agency. Available at www.fema.gov/pdf/emergency/nrf/nrf-core.pdf (accessed December 1, 2009), 90 pp. Wenger, E. 1999. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 336 pp. Witt, J. L., and J. Morgan. 2002. Stronger in the Broken Places: Nine Lessons for Turning Crisis into Triumph. New York: Henry Holt & Company. Yin, R. K., S. J. Kaftarian, P. Yu, and M. A. Jansen. 1997. Outcomes from CSAP’s community partnership program: Findings from the national cross-site evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning 20(3):345-355.