National Academy of Sciences | 150 Year Anniversary

Questions? Call 800-624-6242

| Items in cart [0]

The National Academies Press

HARDBACK
price:$69.95
add to cart

Rights & Permissions

topleft topright

Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D (2011)
Food and Nutrition Board (FNB)

Citation Manager

. "4 Review of Potential Indicators of Adequacy and Selection of Indicators: Calcium and Vitamin D." Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2011.

Please select a format:

BibTeX EndNote RefMan


Page
185
bottomleft bottomright

The following HTML text is provided to enhance online readability. Many aspects of typography translate only awkwardly to HTML. Please use the page image as the authoritative form to ensure accuracy.


DRI Dietary Reference Intakes Calcium Vitamin D

Additional evidence from randomized controlled trials In the WHI trial, a subset of participants completed a cognitive test battery, but results of analyses examining the vitamin D intervention’s effect on cognitive function are not yet available.


Observational studies Numerous observational studies that examined associations between vitamin D, serum 25OHD level, or calcium and cognitive function were identified as potentially relevant to DRI development. The greatest number of studies, however, were cross–sectional. No large prospective cohort studies were identified for review, although two analyses of data from large population-based annual surveys and several small cohort studies were included.

Low serum 25OHD levels have been associated with decreased cognitive function in various population groups. A cross–sectional analysis of 752 women 75 years of age and older in the Epidémiologie de l’Ostéoporose (EPIDOS) study found that participants with vitamin D deficiency (serum 25OHD level < 25 nmol/L) had twice the odds of cognitive impairment as other participants (Annweiler et al., 2010). In a population-based cross–sectional study, Lee et al. (2009) examined associations between serum 25OHD level and cognitive function and mood among adult men in a European population. In a spline regression model, significant associations were found between slower information processing and serum 25OHD levels below 35 nmol/L in men ages 40 years and older. In contrast to these findings, a more recent cross–sectional study found that among 1,604 men up to 65 years of age in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study, there were no associations between serum 25OHD level and cognitive impairment, even after adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, education, and other potential confounders (Slinin et al., 2010). This study also examined vitamin D measures as a predictor of subsequent cognitive decline over a mean of 4.6 years of follow-up and found only a borderline significant trend across the first three quartiles of serum 25OHD levels, (≤ 49.75 nmol/L, 50.0 to < 62.75 nmol/L, and 62.75 to < 74.5 nmol/L, respectively), compared with the fourth quartile (≥ 74.5 nmol/L); serum 25OHD level did not predict decline on a timed test of executive function.

In a cross–sectional study of 318 older individuals (mean age 74 years) receiving home health care services, those who received a neurological exam and cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a lower serum 25OHD level (< 50 nmol/L) was associated with at least twice the odds for all-cause dementia, Alzheimer’s disease, and stroke, as well as increased white-matter hyperintensity volume and prevalence of large-vessel infarcts (Buell et al., 2010). Among three age groups (adolescent, adult, and elderly) examined from NHANES III, no association was found between high serum 25OHD levels and learning or memory, and only the elderly population group was found to have an inverse association between 25OHD level

Page
185
Front Matter (R1-R16)
Summary (1-14)
1 Introduction (15-34)
2 Overview of Calcium (35-74)
3 Overview of Vitamin D (75-124)
4 Review of Potential Indicators of Adequacy and Selection of Indicators: Calcium and Vitamin D (125-344)
5 Dietary Reference Intakes for Adequacy: Calcium and Vitamin D (345-402)
6 Tolerable Upper Intake Levels: Calcium and Vitamin D (403-456)
7 Dietary Intake Assessment (457-478)
8 Implications and Special Concerns (479-512)
9 Information Gaps and Research Needs (513-522)
Appendix A: Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Glossary (523-536)
Appendix B: Issues and Interests Identified by Study Sponsors (537-538)
Appendix C: Methods and Results from the AHRQ-Ottawa Evidence-Based Report on Effectiveness and Safety of Vitamin D in Relation to Bone Health (539-724)
Appendix D: Methods and Results from the AHRQ-Tufts Evidence-Based Report on Vitamin D and Calcium (725-1012)
Appendix E: Literature Search Strategy (1013-1018)
Appendix F: Evidence Maps (1019-1024)
Appendix G: Cases Studies of Vitamin D Toxicity (1025-1034)
Appendix H: Estimated Intakes of Calcium and Vitamin D from National Surveys (1035-1044)
Appendix I: Proportion of the Population Above and Below 40 nmol/L Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations and Cumulative Distribution of Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations: United States and Canada (1045-1058)
Appendix J: Workshop Agenda and Open Session Agendas (1059-1064)
Appendix K: Biographical Sketches of Committee Members (1065-1074)
Index (1075-1102)
Summary Tables: Dietary Reference Intakes (1103-1116)