Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 191
References AASHTO (American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials), 2009. Guide Specifications for the LRFD Seismic Bridge Design, 1st Edition. Washington, DC: AASHTO. ACEHR (Advisory Committee on Earthquake Hazards Reduction), 2009. Letter to the NIST Deputy Director on the Reauthorization of the NEHRP program. May 4. Available at www.nehrp.gov/pdf/may_2009_letter2.pdf (accessed April 30, 2010). ACI (American Concrete Institute), 2008. Building Code Requirements for Structural Con - crete and Commentary. ACI-318-08. Farmington Hills, MI: ACI. ALA (American Lifelines Alliance), 2003. Existing Guidelines Matrix. Available at www. americanlifelinesalliance.org/ExistingGuidelines.htm (accessed April 30, 2010). Alesch, D.J., L.A. Arendt, and J.N. Holly, 2009. Managing for Long-Term Community Recov - ery in the Aftermath of Disaster. Fairfax, VA: Public Entity Risk Institute. Algermissen, S.T., 1969. Seismic risk studies in the United States. Paper presented at the Fourth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile, January 13–18. Allen, R.M., and H. Kanamori, 2003. The potential for earthquake early warning in Southern California. Science 300(5620): 786–789. Allen, R.M., P. Gasparini, O. Kamigaichi, and M. Böse, 2009. The status of earthquake early warning around the world: an introductory overview. Seismological Research Letters 80: 682–693. DOI:10.1785/gssrl.80.5.682. ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers), 2003. Seismic Evaluation of Existing Build - ings. ASCE 31-03. Eds. D.B. Horn and C.D. Poland. Proceedings of the 2004 Structures Congress, May 22–26, 2004, Nashville, TN. ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers), 2005. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. SEI/ASCE Standard 7-05. Reston, VA. ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers), 2007. Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Build - ings. ASCE/SEI 41-06. Washington, DC. ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers), 2009. Report Card for America’s Infrastructure: Report Card 2009 Grades. Available at apps.asce.org/reportcard/2009/grades.cfm (accessed April 30, 2010). 191
OCR for page 192
192 NATIONAL EARTHQUAKE RESILIENCE ATC (Applied Technology Council), 1991. Seismic Vulnerability and Impact of Disruption of Lifelines in the Conterminous United States. ATC-25. Redwood City, CA. ATC (Applied Technology Council), 1994. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Build- ings. ATC-40. Redwood City, CA. ATC (Applied Technology Council), 2007. Prioritized Research for Reducing the Seismic Hazards of Existing Buildings. ATC-73. Redwood City, CA. ATC (Applied Technology Council), 2009a. Existing Buildings Program Action Plan 2009- 2019. ATC-71. Draft in progress. Redwood City, CA. ATC (Applied Technology Council), 2009b. 50% Draft Guidelines for the Seismic Perfor- mance Assessment of Buildings. ATC-58 Report. Draft in progress. Available at www. atcouncil.org (accessed April 30, 2010). ATC (Applied Technology Council), 2010. Here Today—Here Tomorrow: The Road to Earthquake Resilience in San Francisco. A Community Action Plan for Seismic Safety. ATC-52-2. Redwood City, CA. Ballantyne, D., 2007. Seattle Fault Earthquake Scenario. Presented at the New Madrid Earthquake Scenario Workshop, St. Louis, MO, April 20. Available at www.eeri.org/ site/images/projects/newmadrid/6-nmes-wshop-seattle-scen-balantyne.pdf (accessed April 30, 2010). Berke, P.R., and T.J. Campanella, 2006. Planning for Postdisaster Resiliency. The ANNALS 604: 192–207. Berke, P.R., J. Kartez, and D. Wenger, 1993. Recovery after disaster: Achieving sustainable development, mitigation and equity. Disasters 17: 93–109. Blumstein, C., and S. Wiel, 1999. Public-interest research and development in the electric and gas utility industries. Utilities Policy 7: 191–199 Boettke, P., E. Chamlee-Wright, P. Gordon, S. Ikeda, P. Leson, II, and R. Sobel, 2007. Political, Economic and Social Aspects of Katrina. Southern Economic Journal 74: 363–376. Borque, L., 2001. TriNet Policy Studies and Planning Activities in Real-Time Earthquake Early Warning: Task 1 Report, Survey of Potential Early Warning System Users. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA. Bruneau, M., S.E. Chang, R.T. Eguchi, G.C. Lee, T.D. O’Rourke, A.M. Reinhorn, M. Shinozuka, K. Tierney, W.A. Wallace, and D. von Winterfeldt, 2003. A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra 19: 733–752. Burby, R.J., ed., 1998. Cooperating with Nature: Confronting Natural Hazards with Land-Use Planning for Sustainable Communities. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press. Burns, W. J., and P. Slovic, 2007. The diffusion of fear: Modeling community response to a terrorist strike. JDMS: The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation: Applications, Methodology, Technology 4: 298–317. Burns, W.J., R.J. Hofmeister, and Y. Wang, 2008. Geologic hazards, earthquake and landslide hazard maps, and future earthquake damage estimates for six counties in the Mid/ Southern Willamette Valley including Yamhill, Marion, Polk, Benton, Linn, and Lane Counties, and the City of Albany, Oregon, Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries, IMS-24, 121 pp., scale 1:422,400. CARRI (Community and Regional Resilience Institute), 2010. Toward a Common Framework for Community Resilience. Oak Ridge, TN: ORNL. CGS (California Geological Survey), 1982. Planning Scenario for a Magnitude 8.3 Earthquake on the San Andreas Fault in the San Francisco Bay Area, California. SP061. Sacramento, CA: CGS. CGS (California Geological Survey), 1987. Planning Scenario for a Magnitude 7.5 Earthquake on the Hayward Fault in the San Francisco Bay Area, California. SP078. Sacramento, CA: CGS.
OCR for page 193
193 REFERENCES CGS (California Geological Survey), 1988. Planning Scenario for a Major Earthquake on the Newport-Englewood Fault zone (Los Angeles and Orange Counties, California). SP099. Sacramento, CA: CGS. CGS (California Geological Survey), 1993. Planning Scenario for a Major Earthquake on the San Jacinto fault in the San Bernardino area. SP100. Sacramento, CA: CGS. CGS (California Geological Survey), 1995. Planning Scenario in Humboldt and Del Norte Counties for a Great Earthquake on the Cascadia Subduction Zone. SP115. Sacramento, CA: CGS. Chang, S.E., 2009. Conceptual Framework of Resilience for Physical, Financial, Human, and Natural Capital, School of Community and Regional Planning, University of British Columbia, Burnaby, BC. Chang, S.E., 2010. Urban disaster recovery: a measurement framework with application to the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Disasters 34(2): 303–327. Chang, S.E. and M. Shinozuka, 2004. Measuring improvements in the disaster resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra 20: 739–755. Chen, R., D. Branum, and C. Wills, 2009, HAZUS loss estimates for California scenario earthquakes, California Geological Survey. Comfort, L., 1999. Shared Risk: Complex Seismic Response. New York: Pergamon. Cox, A., F. Prager and A. Rose. 2011. Transportation security and the role of resilience: A foundation for operational metrics. Transport Policy 18: 307–317. CREW (The Cascadia Region Earthquake Workgroup), 2005. Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquakes: A Magnitude 9.0 Earthquake Scenario. Publication 0-05-05. Salem, OR: Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries. Crone, A.J. and R.L. Wheeler, 2000. Data for Quaternary Faults, Liquefaction Features, and Possible Tectonic Features in the Central and Eastern United States, East of the Rocky Mountain Front. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-0260. Denver, CO: USGS. Crowell, B.W., Y. Bock, and M.B. Squibb, 2009. Demonstration of earthquake early warn - ing using total displacement waveforms from real-time GPS networks. Seismological Research Letters 80(5): 772–782. Cutter, S.L., (ed.), 2001. American Hazardscapes: The Regionalization of Hazards and Disas - ters. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press. Cutter, S.L., B.J. Boruff, and W.L. Shirley, 2003. Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly 84: 242–261. Cutter, S.L., L. Barnes, M. Berry, C. Burton, E. Evans, E. Tate, and J. Webb, 2008a. Community and regional resilience: Perspectives from hazards, disasters, and emergency manage - ment. CARRI Research Report 1. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Lab. Cutter, S.L., L. Barnes, M. Berry, C. Burton, E. Evans, E. Tate, and J. Webb, 2008b. A place- based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Envi- ronmental Change 18: 598–606. Cutter, S.L., C. Burton, and C. Emrich, 2010. Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline conditions. Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 7: Article 51. DHS (U.S. Department of Homeland Security), 2006. National Infrastructure Protection Pro - gram. Available at www.fas.org/irp/agency/dhs/nipp.pdf (accessed April 30, 2010). DHS (U.S. Department of Homeland Security), 2009. National Infrastructure Protection Plan: Partnering to Enhance Protection and Resiliency. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Available at www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/NIPP_Plan.pdf (accessed August 5, 2010). Drabek, T.E., 2010. The Human Side of Disaster. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group.
OCR for page 194
194 NATIONAL EARTHQUAKE RESILIENCE EarthScope, 2007. EarthScope Facility Operation and Maintenance: October 1, 2008–September 30, 2018. Proposal to the National Science Foundation. Volume I. Available at www.earthscope.org/es_doc/oandm/OandM_Volume_I.pdf (accessed October 1, 2010). EERI (Earthquake Engineering Research Institute), 1996. Scenario for a 7.0 Magnitude Earth - quake on the Hayward Fault. Oakland, CA: EERI. EERI (Earthquake Engineering Research Institute), 2003a. Collection & Management of Earthquake Data: Defining Issues for an Action Plan. Oakland, CA: EERI. EERI (Earthquake Engineering Research Institute), 2003b. Securing Society against Cata - strophic Earthquake Losses: A Research and Outreach Plan in Earthquake Engineering. Oakland, CA: EERI. EERI (Earthquake Engineering Research Institute), 2005. Scenario for a Magnitude 6.7 Earth - quake on the Seattle Fault. Oakland, CA: EERI and the Washington Military Department Emergency Management Division. EERI (Earthquake Engineering Research Institute), 2008. Contributions of Earthquake En - gineering to Protecting Communities and Critical Infrastructure from Multihazards. Oakland, CA: EERI. Ehrlich, I., and G. Becker, 1972. Market insurance, self insurance and self protection. Journal of Political Economy 80: 623–648. Elnashai, A.S., T. Jefferson, F. Fiedrich, L.J. Cleveland, and T. Gress, 2009. Impact of New Madrid Seismic Zone Earthquakes on Central USA. Mid-America Earthquake Center Report, No. 09-03, Vol. 1. Emmer, R., L. Swann, M. Schneider, S. Sempier, and T. Sempier, 2008. Coastal Resiliency Index: A Community Self-Assessment. MASGP-08-014. Washington, DC: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Feinstein, D., 2001. S. 424: A bill to provide incentives to encourage private sector efforts to reduce earthquake losses, to establish a natural disaster mitigation program, and for other purposes. Presented to the Committee on Finance. In Congressional Record— Senate, March 1, 2001, 147(26), Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, pp. S1754-S1760. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency), 1985a. An Action Plan for Reducing Earthquake Hazards of Existing Buildings. FEMA 90. Washington, DC. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency), 1985b. Proceedings of the Workshop on Reducing Seismic Hazards of Existing Buildings. FEMA 91. Washington, DC. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency), 1995. Plan for Developing and Adopting Seismic Design Guidelines and Standards for Lifelines. FEMA Report 271. Washington, DC. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency), 1997a. NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. FEMA Report 273. Washington, DC. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency), 1997b. Report on Costs and Benefits of Natural Hazards Mitigation. FEMA Report 294. Washington, DC. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency), 2001. HAZUS 99 Estimated Annualized Earthquake Losses for the United States. FEMA Report 366. Washington, DC. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency), 2005. Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures. FEMA 440. Washington, DC. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency), 2006. Techniques for the Seismic Reha - bilitation of Existing Buildings. FEMA 547. Washington, DC. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency), 2008. HAZUS-MH Estimated Annualized Earthquake Losses for the United States. FEMA 366. Washington, DC. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency), 2009a. Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors. FEMA Report P-695. Washington, DC.
OCR for page 195
195 REFERENCES FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency), 2009b. NEHRP Recommended Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures. FEMA Report P-750. Washington, DC. Field, E.H., H.A. Seligson, N. Gupta, V. Gupta, T.H. Jordan, and K. Campbell, 2005. Loss estimates for a Puente Hills blind-thrust earthquake in Los Angeles, California, Earth- quake Spectra 21: 329–338. Field, E.H., T.E. Dawson, K.R. Felzer, A.D. Frankel, V. Gupta, T.H. Jordan, T. Parsons, M.D. Petersen, R.S. Stein, R.J. Weldon II, and C.J. Wills, 2007. The Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 2 (UCERF 2). Prepared in cooperation with the California Geological Survey and the Southern California Earthquake Center. USGS Open File Report 2007-1437. Flynn, S., 2008. America the resilient: Defying terrorism and mitigating natural resources. Foreign Affairs 87: 2. Foster, K.A., 2007. A Case Study Approach to Understanding Regional Resilience. Working Paper 2007–08. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley. Frankel, A., C. Mueller, T. Barnhard, D. Perkins, E. Leyendecker, N. Dickman, S. Hanson, and M. Hopper, 1996. National Seismic Hazard Mapping Program, National Seismic- Hazard Maps: Documentation June 1996. Open File Report 96-532. Washington, DC: U.S. Geological Survey. Frankel, A., M.D. Petersen, C.S. Muller, K.M. Haller, R.L. Wheeler, E.V. Leyendecker, R.L. Wesson, S.C. Harmsen, C.H. Cramer, D.M. Perkins, and K.S. Rukstales, 2002. National Seismic Hazard Mapping Program, Documentation for the 2002 Update of the National Seismic Hazard Maps. Open File Report 2002-420. Washington, DC: U.S. Geologic Survey. Gerstenberger, M., L.M. Jones, and S. Wiemer, 2007. Short-term aftershock probabilities: case studies in California. Seismological Research Letters 78: 66–77. DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.78.1.66. Giesecke, J., W.J. Burns, A. Barrett, E. Bayrak, A. Rose, and M. Suher, 2010. Assessment of the Regional Economic Impacts of Catastrophic Events: CGE Analysis of Resource Loss and Behavioral Effects of an RDD Attack Scenario. Risk Analysis, forthcoming. Gigerenzer, G., 2004. Fast and frugal heuristics: The tools of bounded rationality. Pp. 62–88 in D. Koehler and N. Harvey (eds.), Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making. Oxford, England: Blackwell. Gladwell, M., 2000. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. New York: Little, Brown and Company. Godschalk, D.R., 2003. Urban hazard mitigation: Creating resilient cities. Natural Hazards Review 4: 136–143. Godschalk, D.R., A. Rose, E. Mittler, K. Porter, and C.T. West, 2009. Estimating the value of foresight: Aggregate analysis of natural hazard benefits and costs. Journal of Environ- mental Planning and Management 52: 739–756. Graves, R., S. Callaghan, P. Small, G. Mehta, K. Milner, G. Juve, K. Vahi, E. Field, E. Deelman, D. Okaya, P. Maechling, and T.H. Jordon, 2010. Full waveform physics-based probab - listic seismic hazard calculations for Southern California using the SCEC Cyber Shake platform. The University of Tokyo, Symposium on Long Period Ground Motion and Urban Disaster Mitigation, Japan, March 17–18, 2010. Grubesic, T.H., T.C. Matisziw, A.T. Murray, and D. Snediker, 2008. Comparative approaches for assessing network connectivity and vulnerability. International Regional Science Review 31: 88–112. Haimes, Y., 2009. On the definition of resilience in system. Risk Analysis 29: 498–501.
OCR for page 196
196 NATIONAL EARTHQUAKE RESILIENCE Hammond, W.C., B.A. Brooks, R. Bürgmann, T. Heaton, M. Jackson, and A.R. Lowry. 2010. The Scientific Value of High-Rate, Low-Latency GPS Data. A White Paper by the Earth - Scope Plate Boundary Observatory Advisory Committee. August. Available at www. unavco.org/research_science/science_highlights/2010/RealTimeGPSWhitePaper2010. pdf (accessed October 4, 2010). Heal, G., and H. Kunreuther, 2007. Modeling interdependent risks. Risk Analysis 27: 621–633. Heikkla, E., and Y. Wang, 2009. Fujita and Ogawa revisited: an agent-based modeling approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 36: 741–756. Helz, R.L., 2005. Monitoring Ground Deformation from Space. Fact Sheet 2005-3025. July. Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey. Holmes, W.T., 2002. Background and History of the Seismic Hospital Program in California. Proceedings, Seventh U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, July 21-25, 2005, Boston, MA. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Oakland, CA. ImageCat, Inc., and ABS Consulting, 2006. Data Standardization Guidelines for Loss Estimation–Populating Inventory Databases for HAZUS®MH MR-1. Prepared for the California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services. Available at www.usehazus.com/ docs/loss_estimation_guide.pdf (accessed February 9, 2011). Jackson, T., 2005. Live better by consuming less? Is there a “double dividend” in sustainable consumption? Journal of Industrial Ecology 9: 19–36. Johnson, L.A., 2009. Developing a Management Framework for Local Disaster Recovery: A study of the U.S. disaster recovery management system and the management processes and outcomes of disaster recovery in 3 U.S. cities. Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the Doctoral Degree, School of Informatics, Kyoto University. March. Jones, L.M., 1991. Short-term Earthquake Hazard Assessment for the San Andreas Fault in southern California. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 91–32. Jones, L.M., R. Bernknopf, D. Cox, J. Goltz, K. Hudnut, D. Mileti, S. Perry, D. Ponti, K. Porter, M. Reichle, H. Seligson, K. Shoaf, J. Treiman, and A. Wein, 2008. The ShakeOut Scenario: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1150 and California Geological Survey Preliminary Report 25. Available at pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1150/ (accessed August 13, 2010). Jordan, T.H., and L.M. Jones, 2010. Operational earthquake forecasting: some thoughts on why and how. Seismological Society of America 81: 571–574. Jordan, T.H., Y.-T. Chen, P. Gasparini, R. Madariaga, I. Main, W. Marzocchi, G. Papadopoulos, G. Sobolev, K. Yamaoka and J. Zschau, 2009. Operational Earthquake Forecasting: State of Knowledge and Guidelines for Implementation. Findings and Recommendations of the International Commission on Earthquake Forecasting for Civil Protection, Dipartimento della Protezione Civile, Rome, Italy, October 2, 2009. Kajitani, Y., and H. Tatano, 2007. Estimation of lifeline resilience factors based on empirical surveys of Japanese industries. Earthquake Spectra 25: 755–776. Kamigaichi, O., M. Saito, K. Doi, T. Matsumori, S. Tsukada, K. Takeda, T. Shimoyama, K. Nakamura, M. Kiyomoto, and Y. Watanabe, 2009. Earthquake early warning in Japan: Warning the general public and future prospects. Seismology Research Letters 80: 717–726. Kircher, C.A., H.A. Seligson, J. Bouabid, and G.C. Morrow, 2006. When the Big One strikes again—estimated losses due to a repeat of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake. Earthquake Spectra 22: S297–S339. Kreps, G.A., 2001. “Disasters, sociology of.” Pp. 3719–3721 in N. Smelser and P. Bates (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 6. Oxford, UK: Elsevier. Kreps, G.A., and T.E. Drabek, 1996. Disasters are non-routine social problems. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 14: 129–153.
OCR for page 197
197 REFERENCES Kreps, G.A., and S.L. Bosworth, 2006. Organizational adaptation to disaster. Pp. 297–316 in Handbook of Disaster Research, H. Rodriguez, E.L. Quarantelli, and R.R. Dynes (eds.), New York: Springer. Kunreuther, H., and R.R. Roth (eds.), 1998. Paying the Price: The Status and Role of Insurance against Natural Disasters in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press. Kunreuther, H., R. Ginsberg, L. Miller, P. Sagi, P. Slovic, B. Borkan, and N. Katz, 1978. Disaster Insurance Protection: Public Policy Lessons. New York: Wiley Interscience. Kunreuther, H., R. Meyer, and C. Van den Bulte, 2004. Risk Analysis for Extreme Events: Economic Incentives for Reducing Future Losses. NIST Technical Report GCR 04-871. Washington, DC: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Kverndokk, S., and A. Rose, 2008. Equity and justice in global warming policy. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 2(2): 135–176. Lancieril, M., and A. Zollo, 2008. A Bayesian approach to the real-time estimation of mag - nitude from the early P and S wave displacement peaks. Journal of Geophysical Research 113 (B12302). Lawson, A.C., 1908. The California Earthquake of April 18, 1906: Report of the State Earth - quake Investigation Commission. Publication 87, 2 vols. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution. Luco, N., and E. Karaca, 2007. Extending the USGS National Seismic Hazard Maps and ShakeMaps to probabilistic building damage and risk maps. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering , Tokyo, Japan. McCalpin, J.P., ed., 2009. Paleoseismology (2nd Edition). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. McDaniels, T., S.E. Chang, D. Cole, J. Mikawoz, and H. Longstaff, 2008. Fostering resilience to extreme events within infrastructure systems: Characterizing decision contexts for mitigation and adaptation. Global Environmental Change 18: 310–318. MCEER (Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research), 2008. MCEER research: Enabling disaster-resilient communities. Seismic Waves (November) 1–2. Available at www.nehrp.gov/pdf/SeismicWavesNov08.pdf (accessed October 4, 2010). Mendonca, D., 2007. Decision support for improvisation in response to the 2001 World Trade Center attack. Decisions Support Systems 43: 952–967. Miles, S.B., and S.E. Chang, 2006. Modeling community recovery from earthquakes. Earth- quake Spectra 22: 439–458. Mileti, D., 1999. Disasters by Design: A Reassessment of Natural Hazards in the United States. Washington, DC: The Joseph Henry Press. MMC (Multihazard Mitigation Council), 2005. Natural Hazard Mitigation Saves: An Inde - pendent Study to Assess the Future Savings from Mitigation Activities. Washington, DC: National Institute of Building Sciences. Available at www.nibs.org/index.php/ mmc/projects/nhms/ (accessed June 30, 2010). Muto, M., S. Krishnan, J.L. Beck, and J. Mitrani-Reiser, 2008. Seismic loss estimation based on end-to-end simulation. Pp. 215–220 in F. Biodini and D.M. Frangopol (eds.), Life-Cycle Civil Engineering. London: CRC Press. Navrud, S., and R. Ready (eds.) 2002. Valuing Cultural Heritage: Applying Environmental Valuation Techniques to Historic Buildings, Monuments and Artifacts. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing. NEHRP (National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program), 2007. Program Overview. Available at www.nehrp.gov/pdf/nehrp_acehr_ppt.pdf (accessed August 13, 2010). NHC (Natural Hazards Center), 2006. Holistic Disaster Recovery: Ideas for Building Local Sustainability after a Natural Disaster. Boulder, Colorado: University of Colorado. NIBS (National Institute of Building Sciences), 1989. Strategies and Approaches for Imple - menting a Comprehensive Program to Mitigate the Risk to Lifelines from Earthquakes and Other Natural Hazards. Washington, DC: NIBS. Catalog No. 5047–8.
OCR for page 198
198 NATIONAL EARTHQUAKE RESILIENCE NIBS (National Institute of Building Sciences), 2007. American Lifelines Alliance Workshop on Unified Data Collection. Washington, DC: NIBS. November. Available at www. americanlifelinesalliance.org/pdf/ALAdatawkshprpt.pdf (August 13, 2010). NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), 1996. Proceedings of a Workshop on Developing and Adopting Seismic Design and Construction Standards for Lifelines. NISTIR 5907. Gaithersburg, MD. NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), 1997. Recommendations of the Lifeline Policymakers Workshop. NISTIR 6085. Gaithersburg, MD. NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), 2008. Strategic Plan for the National Hazards Reduction Program: Fiscal Years 2009-2013. Gaithersburg, MD. Available at nehrp.gov/pdf/strategic_plan_2008.pdf (accessed October 4, 2010). NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), 2009. Research Required to Support the Full Implementation of Performance-based Seismic Design. NIST Report GCR 09- 917-2. Gaithersburg, MD. Norris, F.H., S.P. Stevens, B. Pfefferbaum, K.F. Wyche, and R.L. Pfefferbaum, 2008. Commu - nity resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. American Journal of Community Psychology 41: 127–150. NRC (National Research Council), 2001. Review of EarthScope Integrated Science. Washing - ton, DC: National Academy Press. NRC (National Research Council), 2003. Living on an Active Earth: Perspectives on Earth - quake Science. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. NRC (National Research Council), 2006a. Facing Hazards and Disasters: Understanding Human Dimensions. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. NRC (National Research Council), 2006b. Improved Seismic Monitoring—Improved Decision-Making: Assessing the Value of Reduced Uncertainty. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. NRC (National Research Council), 2006c. CLEANER and NSF’s Environmental Observato - ries. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. NRC (National Research Council), 2007. Improving Disaster Management: The Role of IT in Mitigation, Preparedness, Response, and Recovery. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. NRC (National Research Council), 2009. Sustainable Critical Infrastructure Systems—A Framework for Meeting 21st Century Imperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. NRC (National Research Council), 2010. Tsunami Warning and Preparedness: An Assessment of the U.S. Tsunami Program and the Nation’s Preparedness Efforts. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. O’Rourke, T., 2009. Testimony to the Subcommittee on Technology Innovation. U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Science on the Reauthorization of the National Earth - quake Hazards Reduction Program. June 11. Olsen, K.B., S. Day, J.B. Minster, Y. Cui, A. Chourasia, M. Faerman, R. Moore, P. Maechling, and T. H. Jordan, 2006. Strong Shaking in Los Angeles Expected From Southern San Andreas Earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters 33, L07305. DOI:10.1029/2005GL025472. Olshansky. R., and S. Chang, 2009. Planning for disaster recovery: emerging research needs and challenges. Journal of Progress in Planning 200-209. Olshansky, R., L. Johnson, and K. Topping, 2006. Rebuilding communities following disaster: Lessons from Kobe and Los Angeles. Built Environment 32: 354–374. Peacock, W.G., H. Kunreuther, W.H. Hooke, S.L. Cutter, S.E. Chang, and P.R. Berke, 2008. Toward a Resiliency and Vulnerability Observatory Network: RAVON. College Station, TX: Hazard Reduction and Recovery Center, Texas A&M University. HRRC report 08-02-R.
OCR for page 199
199 REFERENCES Perry, S., D. Cox, L. Jones, R. Bernknopf, J. Goltz, K. Hudnut, D. Mileti, D. Ponti, K. Porter, M. Reichle, H. Seligson, K. Shoaf, J. Treiman, and A. Wein, 2008. The ShakeOut Earth - quake Scenario—A story that southern Californians are writing. USGS Circular 1324. Petak, W.J., and A.A. Atkisson, 1982. Natural Hazard Risk Assessment and Public Policy. New York: Springer-Verlag. Petersen, M.D., A.D. Frankel, S.C. Harmsen, C.S. Mueller, K.M. Haller, R.L. Wheeler, R. L. Wesson, Y. Zeng, O.S. Boyd, D.M. Perkins, N. Luco, E.H. Field, C.J. Wills, and K.S. Rukstales, 2008. Documentation for the 2008 Update of the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008–1128. Washing - ton, DC: USGS. PIMS Project Team, 2008. Post-Earthquake Information Management System (PIMS) Scoping Study. Prepared for the American Lifelines Alliance. September 8. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois. Porter, K.A., J.A. Beck, and R.V. Shaikhutdinov, 2002. Sensitivity of building loss estimates to major uncertain variables. Earthquake Spectra 18: 719–743. Porter, K.A., S. Hellman, T. McLane, and C. Carlisle, 2010. ROVER: Rapid Observation of Vulnerability and Estimation of Risk. Denver, CO: SPA Risk, LLC. Available at www. sparisk.com/pubs/ATC67-2010-ROVER-flyer.pdf (accessed August 16, 2010). Pritchard, M.E., 2006. InSAR, a tool for measuring Earth’s surface deformation. Physics To- day (July): 68–69. Available at www.geo.cornell.edu/eas/PeoplePlaces/Faculty/matt/ vol59no7p68_69.pdf. R&C (Rutherford & Chekene Consulting Engineers), 2004. Superior Courts of California, Seismic Assessment Program: Summary Report of Preliminary Findings. Prepared for the California Administrative Office of the Courts, San Francisco, CA. Available at www. courtinfo.ca.gov/reference/documents/seismic0104.pdf (accessed October 6, 2010). Renschler, C.S., M.W. Doyle, and M. Thoms, 2007. Geomorphology and ecosystems: Chal - lenges and keys for success in bridging disciplines. Geomorphology 89: 1–8. RMS (Risk Management Solutions, Inc.), 2008. 1868 Hayward Earthquake: 140-year retrospective. RMS Special Report. Available at www.rms.com/Publications/1868_ Hayward_Earthquake_Retrospective.pdf (accessed August 16, 2010). Roberts, E.B. and F.P. Ulrich, 1950. Seismological activities of the US coast and geodetic survey in 1948. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 40: 195–216. Rogers, E.M., 2003. Diffusion of Innovations (5th Edition). New York: Free Press. Rose, A., 2002. Model validation in estimating higher-order economic losses from natural hazards. Pp. 105–131 in Acceptable Risk to Lifeline Systems from Natural Hazard Threats, C. Taylor and E. Van Marcke (eds.), New York: American Society of Civil Engineers. Rose, A., 2004. Defining and measuring economic resilience to disasters. Disaster Prevention and Management 13: 307–314. Rose, A., 2005. Analyzing terrorist threats to the economy: A computable general equilib - rium approach. Pp. 196–217 in Economic Impacts of Terrorist Attacks, H. Richardson, P. Gordon, J. Moore (eds.), Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Rose, A., 2007. Economic resilience to natural and man-made disasters: Multidisciplinary origins and contextual dimensions. Environmental Hazards 7: 383–395. Rose, A., 2009. Economic Resilience to Disasters. Final Report to the Community and Region- al Resilience Institute (CARRI). CARRI Research Report 8. Available at www.resilientus. org/library/Research_Report_8_Rose_1258138606.pdf (accessed August 16, 2010). Rose, A., and S. Liao, 2005. Modeling regional economic resilience to disasters: A computable general equilibrium analysis of a water service disruption. Journal of Regional Science 45: 75–112. Rose, A., and D. Wei, 2007. Indirect loss estimation for water systems. RAMCAP Loss Esti - mation Software. Washington, DC: ASME Institute.
OCR for page 200
200 NATIONAL EARTHQUAKE RESILIENCE Rose, A., and T. Szelazek, 2010. An Analysis of the Business Continuity Industry. Center for Risk and Economic Analysis of Terrorism Events (CREATE), University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA. Rose, A., G. Oladosu, B. Lee, and G. Beeler-Asay, 2009. The economic impacts of the 2001 terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis. Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy 15: Article 4. Rose, A., J. Benavides, S. Chang, P. Szczesniak, and D. Lim, 1997. The regional economic impact of an earthquake: Direct and indirect effects of electricity lifeline disruptions. Journal of Regional Science 37: 437–458. Rose, A., K. Porter, J. Bouabid, C. Huyck, J. Whitehead, D. Shaw, R. Eguchi, T. McLane, L.T. Tobin, P.T. Ganderton, D. Godschalk, A.S. Kiremidjian, K. Tierney, and C.T. West, 2007. Benefit-cost analysis of FEMA hazard mitigation grants. Natural Hazards Review 8: 97–111. Rose, A., S. Liao, and A. Bonneau. In press. Regional economic impacts of a Verdugo earth - quake disruption of Los Angeles water supplies: A computable general equilibrium analysis, Earthquake Spectra, forthcoming. Rose, A., D. Wei, and A. Wein. In press. Economic Impacts of the ShakeOut Scenario. Earth- quake Spectra, forthcoming. Rowshandel. B., M. Reichle, C. Wills, T. Cao, M. Petersen, D. Branum, and J. Davis., 2003, Estimation of Future Earthquake Losses in California. California Geological Survey. Rubin, C., 1985. Community Recovery from a Major Natural Disaster. Monograph No. 41: University of Colorado Program on Environment and Behavior, Institute of Behavioral Science. Schmidtlein, M.C., R.C. Deutsch, W.W. Piegorsch, and S.L. Cutter, 2008. Building indexes of vulnerability: A sensitivity analysis of the social vulnerability index. Risk Analysis 28: 1099–1114. Schwab, J., 1998. Planning for Post-Disaster Recovery and Reconstruction. Planning Advisory Service Report Number 483/484. Chicago, IL: American Planning Association. Schweitzer, L. 2006. Environmental justice and hazmat transport: A spatial analysis in South - ern California. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment,11(6): 408–421. SDR (Subcommittee on Disaster Reduction), 2005. Grand Challenges for Disaster Reduc - tion. National Science and Technology Council (NSTC) Committee on Environment and Natural Resources. Available at www.sdr.gov/GrandChallengesSecondPrinting. pdf (accessed August 13, 2010). Seligson, H., 2007. HAZUS Modeling for the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake Scenario: Lessons Learned & Suggestions for a New Madrid Earthquake Scenario. Presentation to the New Madrid Earthquake Scenario Workshop, April 20, St. Louis, MO. Available at www.eeri.org/site/images/projects/newmadrid/7-nmes-wshop-sf-scen-seligson. pdf (accessed at August 16, 2010). Shearer, P., and R. Bürgmann, 2010. Lessons learned from the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman mega - thrust rupture. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 38: 103–131. Shinozuka, M., A. Rose, and R. Eguchi, 1998. Engineering and Socioeconomic Impacts of Earthquakes: An Analysis of Electricity Lifeline Disruptions in the New Madrid Area. MCEER-98-MN02. Buffalo, NY: University of Buffalo. Smith, V. K., C. Mansfield, and A. Strong, 2008. Can the Economic Value of Security be Measured? Department of Economics, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ. Soong, T. T., S. Y. Chu, and A. M. Reinhorn, 2005. Active, Hybrid, and Semi-active Structural Control: A Design and Implementation Handbook. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Spencer, B., and T.T. Soong, 1999. New applications and development of active, semi-active and hybrid control techniques for seismic and non-seismic vibration in the USA. Pro - ceedings of International Post-SMiRT Seminar on Seismic Isolation, Passive Energy Dissipation and Active Vibration of Structures, Cheju, Korea, August 23-25.
OCR for page 201
201 REFERENCES SPUR (San Francisco Planning and Urban Research Association), 2009. The Resilient City. Part I: Before the Disaster. San Francisco, CA: SPUR. Available at www.spur.org/ publications/library/report/theresilientcity_part1_020109 (accessed August 13, 2010). Sternberg, E., and K. Tierney, 1998. Planning for Robustness and Resilience: The Northridge and Kobe Earthquakes and Their Implications for Reconstruction and Recovery. Paper presented at US-Japan Workshop on Post-disaster Recovery, Newport Beach, CA, August 24–25. Swift, J.N., L.L. Turner, J. Benoit, J.C. Stepp, and C.J. Roblee, 2004. Archiving and Web Dis - semination of Geotechnical Data: Development of a Pilot Geotechnical Virtual Data Center, Final Report. PEER Lifelines Project 2L02. Berkeley, CA: PEER Lifelines Pro - gram, University of California, Berkeley. Tantala, M., G. Nordenson, G. Deodatis, K. Jacob, B. Swiren, M. Augustyniak, A. Dargush, M. Marrocolo, and D. O’Brien, 2003. Earthquake Risks and Mitigation in the New York, New Jersey, Connecticut Region, NYCEM. Final Summary Report, MCEER -03-SP02. Buffalo, NY: MCEER. Terra, F.M., I.G. Wong, A. Frankel, D. Bausch, T. Biasco, and J.D. Schelling, 2010. HAZUS analysis of 15 earthquake scenarios in the state of Washington. Seismological Research Letters 81: 336. Thompson, C., 2008. Is the tipping point toast? Fast Company Magazine, Issue 122, February. Available at www.fastcompany.com/magazine/122/is-the-tipping-point-toast.html (accessed October 6, 2010). Tierney, K.J., 1994. Business Vulnerability and Disruption: Data from the Midwest Floods. Paper presented at the 41st North American Meetings of the Regional Sciences Associa - tion International, Niagara Falls, Ontario, November 16–20. Tierney, K.J., 1997. Impacts of recent disasters on businesses: The 1993 Midwest floods and the 1994 Northridge earthquake. Pp. 189–222 in Economic Consequences of Earthquakes: Preparing for the Unexpected, B. Jones (ed.), Buffalo, NY: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research. Tierney, K.J., 2007. From the margins to the mainstream? Disaster research at the crossroads. Annual Review of Sociology 33: 503–525. Tierney, K.J., M.K. Lindell, and R.W. Perry, 2001. Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Prepared - ness and Response in the United States. Washington, DC: The Joseph Henry Press. Tobin, G.A., 1999. Sustainability and community resilience: The holy grails of hazards plan - ning? Environmental Hazards 1: 13–25. UN ISDR (United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction), 2006. Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters. Extract from the final report of the World Conference on Disaster Reduc- tion (A/CONF.206/6), March 16, 2005. URS Corporation, Durham Technologies, Inc., ImageCat, Inc., Pacific Engineering & Analysis, and S&ME, Inc., 2001. Comprehensive Seismic Risk and Vulnerability Study for the State of South Carolina. Final report to the South Carolina Emergency Preparedness Division, Columbia, SC. U.S.-Canada Power System Outage Task Force, 2004. Final Report on the August 14, 2003 Blackout in the United States and Canada: Causes and Recommendations. Available at reports.energy.gov/ (accessed August 16, 2010). USGS (United States Geological Survey), 1999. Requirement for an Advanced National Seismic System. Circular 1188. Available at pubs.usgs.gov/circ/c1188/circular.pdf (accessed October 4, 2010).
OCR for page 202
202 NATIONAL EARTHQUAKE RESILIENCE USGS (United States Geological Survey), 2007. The Plan to Coordinate NEHRP Post-Earth - quake Investigations. Prepared in Coordination with the Federal Emergency Manage - ment Agency, National Science Foundation, and National Institute of Standards and Technology. USGS Circular 1242. Available at geopubs.wr.usgs.gov/circular/c1242/ c1242.pdf (accessed August 16, 2010). Vugrin, E., Warren, D., Ehlen, N., Rose, A., and Barrett, A, 2009. Chemical Supply Chain and Resilience Project: A Resilience Definition for Use in Economic and Critical Infra - structure Resilience Analysis. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM and National Center for Risk and Economic Analysis of Terrorism Events (CREATE), University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, August 24. Wald, D. J., B. Worden, V. Quitoriano, and J. Goltz, 2001. Practical Applications for Earth - quake Scenarios Using ShakeMap. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2001, abstract #S32D-01. Weaver, C., B.L. Sherrod, R.A. Haugerud, K.L. Meagher, A.D. Franke, S.P. Palmer, and R.J. Blakely, 2005. The scenario earthquake and ground motions. Chapter 1 in M. Stewart, (ed.), Scenario for a Magnitude 6.7 Earthquake on the Seattle Fault. Oakland, CA, EERI, and Camp Murray, WA, Washington Military Department, Emergency Management Division. Webb, G.R., K.J. Tierney, and J.M. Dahlhamer, 2000. Business and disasters: Empirical patterns and unanswered questions. Natural Hazards Review 1: 83–90. Whitehead, J., S. Pattanayek, B. Houtven, and B. Gelso, 2008. Combining revealed and stated preference data to estimate the nonmarket value of ecological services: An assessment of the state of the science. Journal of Economic Surveys 22: 874–908. Whitehead, J., and A. Rose, 2009. Estimating environmental benefits of natural hazard miti - gation: Results from a benefit-cost analysis of FEMA mitigation grants. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 14: 655–676. Whittaker, A.S., and R.C. Krumme, 1993. Structural Control Using Shapememory Alloys. E*Sorb Systems Report No. 9301. Berkeley, CA. Williams, M.L., K.M. Fischer, J.T. Freymueller, B. Tikoff, A.M. Trehu, et al., 2010. Unlocking the Secrets of the North American Continent: An EarthScope Science Plan for 2010- 2020, February, 2010. 78 pp. Available at www.earthscope.org/ESSP (accessed October 4, 2010). WGCEP (Working Group on California Earthquake Probabilities), 2008. The Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 2 (UCERF 2), U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report 2007-1437. Reston, VA. Zechar, J.D., D. Schorlemmer, M. Liukis, J. Yu, F. Euchner, P.J. Maechling, and T. H. Jordan, 2009. The Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability perspectives on computational earth science, Concurrency & Computation 22: 1836–1847. Zhang, Y., and W.G. Peacock, 2010. Planning for Housing Recovery? Lessons Learned From Hurricane Andrew. Journal of the American Planning Association 76: 1, 5–24. Zielke, O., J. R. Arrowsmith, L. G. Ludwig, and S. O. Akciz, 2010. Slip in the 1857 and Earlier Large Earthquakes Along the Carrizo Plain, San Andreas Fault. DOI:10.1126/ science.1182781. Science 327: 1119–1122. Zoback, M.L., and P. Grossi, 2010. The next Hayward earthquake—who will pay? Pp. XXX–XXX in K. Knudsen, J. Baldwin, T. Brocher, R. Burgmann, M. Craig, D. Cushing, P. Hellweg, M. Wiegers, and I. Wog, (eds.), Proceedings of the Third Conference on Earthquake Hazards in the eastern San Francisco Bay Area. California Geological Survey, Special Publication xxx.