Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 223
Appendix D
Community Workshop Attendees and
Presentations to Committee
WORKSHOP ATTENDEES
Walter Arabasz
University of Utah
Ralph Archuleta
University of California, Santa Barbara
Mark Benthien
University of Southern California
Jonathan Bray
University of California, Berkeley
Arrietta Chakos
Harvard Kennedy School, Taubman Center for State and Local
Government
Mary Comerio
University of California, Berkeley
Reginald DesRoches
Department of Civil Engineering, Georgia Tech
Andrea Donnellan
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
223
OCR for page 224
224 APPENDIX D
Leonardo Duenas-Osorio
Rice University
Paul Earle
U.S. Geological Survey
Richard Eisner
Fritz Institute
Ronald Eguchi
Imagecat, Inc.
Art Frankel
U.S. Geological Survey
James Goltz
California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services
Ronald Hamburger
Simpson Gumpertz & Heger
Jim Harris
J. R. Harris & Company
Jack Hayes
National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program, National Institute of
Standards and Technology
Jon Heintz
Applied Technology Council
Eric Holdeman
Eric Holdeman & Associates
Doug Honegger
D.G. Honegger Consulting
Richard Howe
R.W. Howe & Associates, PLC
Theresa Jefferson
Center for Technology, Security, and Policy, Virginia Polytechnic
Institute and State University
OCR for page 225
225
APPENDIX D
Lucy Jones
U.S. Geological Survey
Michael Lindell
Texas A&M University
Nicolas Luco
U.S. Geological Survey
Steven Mahin
Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of
California, Berkeley
Peter May
Center for American Politics and Public Policy, Political Science
Department, University of Washington
Dick McCarthy
California Seismic Safety Commission
David Mendonça
New Jersey’s Science & Technology University
Dennis Mileti
Natural Hazards Center
Robert Olson
Robert Olson Associates, Inc.
Chris Poland
Degenkolb Engineers
Woody Savage
U.S. Geological Survey
Hope Seligson
MMI Engineering
Kimberley Shoaf
University of California, Los Angeles
Paul Somerville
URS Corporation
OCR for page 226
226 APPENDIX D
Kathleen Tierney
Natural Hazards Center, University of Colorado
Susan Tubbesing
Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
John Vidale
Pacific Northwest Seismic Network
Yumei Wang
Oregon Dept of Geology and Mineral Industries
Gary Webb
Oklahoma State University
Sharon Wood
Department of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering,
University of Texas at Austin
Brent Woodworth
Los Angeles Emergency Preparedness Foundation
Mary Lou Zoback
Risk Management Solutions, Inc.
OCR for page 227
227
APPENDIX D
WORKSHOP BREAKOUT QUESTIONS
Cross-disciplinary Breakout—
Elements of an Earthquake-Resilient Nation
1: What does an earthquake-resilient nation look like?
2: How should we measure national resilience? How would we know if
we are becoming more earthquake resilient?
Disciplinary Breakout—
Fundamental Science Requirements and Enabling Technologies
3: What are the fundamental science requirements in your disciplinary
area for an earthquake-resilient nation?
4: What are the enabling technologies in your disciplinary area needed for
an earthquake-resilient nation?
Disciplinary Breakout—Implementation and Policy Aspects
5: What are the implementation challenges and opportunities needed for
an earthquake-resilient nation?
6: What are the behavioral changes needed for an earthquake-resilient
nation?
Cross-disciplinary Breakout—Fundamental Science Requirements
7: Are there any missing activities contained in Question 3 responses?
8: What activities are critical for advancing resilience?
9: What is the sequence of activities?
Cross-disciplinary Breakout—Enabling Technologies
10: Are there any missing activities contained in Question 4 responses?
11: What activities are critical for advancing resilience?
12: What is the sequence of activities?
Cross-disciplinary Breakout—Implementation and Policy Aspects
13: Are there any missing activities contained in Questions 5 and 6 responses?
14: What activities are critical for advancing resilience?
15: What is the sequence of activities?
OCR for page 228
228 APPENDIX D
PRESENTATIONS TO THE COMMITTEE
Meeting 1:
Context of the Project Shyam Sunder, NIST
Sponsor Hopes and Expectations Jack Hayes, NEHRP/NIST
NEHRP Strategic Plan Jack Hayes, NEHRP/NIST
FEMA Update—Earthquake Resilience Activities Ed Laatsch, FEMA
Mike Mahoney, FEMA
Role of the U.S. Geological Survey in the
National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program
David Applegate, USGS
Role of the National Science Foundation in the
National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program
Joy Pauschke, NSF-ENG
Eva Zanzerkia, NSF-GEO
Richard Fragaszy, NSF-ENG
Dennis Wenger, NSF-ENG
Meeting 2:
Cost Estimates in the EERI “Securing Society” Report
Paul Somerville, URS Corporation
Meeting 3:
Closed session only.
Meeting 4:
Closing comments from the NSF Joy Pauschke, NSF-ENG
Closing comments from NIST/NEHRP Jack Hayes, NEHRP/NIST
Closing comments from the U.S. Geological Survey David Applegate
Closing comments from the Federal Emergency Management Agency
Mike Mahoney, FEMA
OCR for page 229
229
APPENDIX D
Status of NEHRP reauthorization process Jack Hayes, NEHRP/NIST
An Individual Perspective based on extensive involvement with NEHRP
John Filson, USGS Emeritus
OCR for page 230
