Tick-borne diseases (TBDs) represent some of the world’s most rapidly expanding arthropod-borne infectious diseases, yet significant gaps remain in our understanding and knowledge about them. In the United States, many tick-borne diseases such as anaplasmosis and the borrelioses, ehrlichioses, and rickettsioses are on the rise. Reasons include shifts in the prevalence and distribution of animal reservoirs and tick vectors as well as the movement of humans into areas where the animal hosts and tick populations are abundant. From a public health standpoint, the burden of disease is of growing concern, as is the incomplete understanding of the complex interactions of ticks, hosts, pathogens, and habitats that underlie changing disease patterns and the potential for climate change to exacerbate these trends.
The Committee on Lyme Disease and Other Tick-Borne Diseases: The State of the Science was formed at the request of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases to hold a 2-day workshop on the state of the science of Lyme disease and other TBDs. The committee was requested to be inclusive in the breadth of scientific approaches and disciplines, but to exclude treatment guidelines from the workshop. Furthermore, the workshop was to provide a forum for broad scientific and public input and to produce a workshop report that would highlight the major themes of the workshop and commissioned papers. The committee was not constituted to develop conclusions or recommendations. The committee recognized that the limitation of a 2-day workshop meant that not all proposed topics or speakers could be accommodated; it did its best to cover a range of topics and speakers.
Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter.
Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.
OCR for page 1
Overview
Tick-borne diseases (TBDs) represent some of the world’s most rap-
idly expanding arthropod-borne infectious diseases, yet significant gaps
remain in our understanding and knowledge about them. In the United
States, many tick-borne diseases such as anaplasmosis and the borrelioses,
ehrlichioses, and rickettsioses are on the rise. Reasons include shifts in the
prevalence and distribution of animal reservoirs and tick vectors as well
as the movement of humans into areas where the animal hosts and tick
populations are abundant. From a public health standpoint, the burden of
disease is of growing concern, as is the incomplete understanding of the
complex interactions of ticks, hosts, pathogens, and habitats that underlie
changing disease patterns and the potential for climate change to exacerbate
these trends.
The Committee on Lyme Disease and Other Tick-Borne Diseases: The
State of the Science was formed at the request of the National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Diseases to hold a 2-day workshop on the state of
the science of Lyme disease and other TBDs. The committee was requested
to be inclusive in the breadth of scientific approaches and disciplines, but to
exclude treatment guidelines from the workshop. Furthermore, the work-
shop was to provide a forum for broad scientific and public input and to
produce a workshop report that would highlight the major themes of the
workshop and commissioned papers. The committee was not constituted to
develop conclusions or recommendations. The committee recognized that
the limitation of a 2-day workshop meant that not all proposed topics or
speakers could be accommodated; it did its best to cover a range of topics
and speakers.
1
OCR for page 1
2 CRITICAL RESEARCH NEEDS IN TICK-BORNE DISEASES
The presentations summarized in this document represent the views of
the individual speakers and should not be interpreted as a consensus or an
endorsement by the Institute of Medicine, the committee, or its sponsors.
Furthermore, the committee recognizes that the language and terminology
used to describe various facets and manifestations of Lyme disease and
coinfecting conditions are not uniform throughout the report—this reflects
differences in scientific perspective among speakers and authors. As high-
lighted by many presenters, a standard lexicon that is consistently applied
and understood would improve and advance research efforts related to
Lyme disease and other tick-borne diseases. Furthermore, addressing the
major knowledge gaps identified in this report is likely to lead to standard-
ization of terminology as the unknown becomes the known.
The following sections of the overview summarize the committee’s
highlights of presentations and discussions from the scientific portion of the
agenda. The committee appreciates the time and efforts of the presenters
and commissioned paper authors and the many participants who shared
their stories to provide a context for these discussions. The interactions
with patients and advocates were useful and constructive and served as an
effective reminder of why scientific observations and gaps in knowledge
need to be filled. Science is lagging behind as the burden of these diseases
increases. The reader is directed to Chapter 3 for the rich presentation of
participant views.
EMERGING INFECTIONS, TICK BIOLOGY,
AND HOST–VECTOR INTERACTIONS
The recognized number of serious diseases transmitted by ticks has
increased over the past 30 years. The emergence and increased incidence
of several major TBDs has been attributed to specific human activities
and behaviors that disrupt ecosystems. Increases in human population
and demographic shifts have brought dramatic changes in the distribution
and composition of natural habitats, as people modify the land for living
spaces, agriculture, or recreation. These changes mean that people and
animals interact at many more interfaces, creating new opportunities for
the transmission of zoonotic pathogens, including those responsible for
TBDs. This session examined the natural history of ticks and their wildlife
and domestic hosts; outlined the contributions of animal health experts to
understanding human TBD; explored genetic diversity among pathogens,
vectors, and hosts; and showed how scientists are investigating the micro-
bial community found within the ticks themselves. During the session, the
individual speakers highlighted a number of research gaps and opportuni-
ties for studying TBDs. Some of these gaps and opportunities cut across
individual presentations and comments from the audience. A few of the
themes discussed included
OCR for page 1
3
OVERVIEW
• Regional differences in the distribution of ticks and tick-borne
pathogens and their contribution to human disease.
• Environmental systems and the “One Health” (i.e., the interface of
human, animal, and environmental health that includes complexi-
ties of the ecosystems or the interface of biological communities and
their physical or abiotic environment) approach to understanding
tick-borne diseases.
• The biology and dynamic characteristics of disease vectors.
• The risk of TBDs as they relate to ecological fragmentation and
reduced wildlife diversity.
• The tick microbiome and its role in transmission of pathogens to
humans.
SURVEILLANCE, SPECTRUM, AND
BURDEN OF TICK-BORNE DISEASE,
AND AT-RISK POPULATIONS
An understanding of the science of Lyme disease and other TBDs begins
with the surveillance, spectrum, and burden of disease. This session focused
on the current state of knowledge of the prevalence, incidence, patterns,
and severity of key TBDs in the United States and their impact on patients.
The presenters discussed efforts to track the movement of pathogens in the
environment, how infection moves from animals to people, and the burden
of human infection and disease, especially among vulnerable populations.
Some themes discussed included
• The relative contributions of changes in surveillance, clinical recog-
nition, and testing patterns to the rising incidence of all of the major
tick-borne diseases.
• The impact of coinfection in severity of human TBDs.
• Biological understanding of persistent symptoms.
PATHOGENESIS
Understanding pathogenesis of an infectious disease at the cellular and
molecular levels is critical for discovering, developing, and implementing
methods to prevent infection, and to improve patient outcomes after treat-
ment. Scientists rely on several approaches to study the pathogenesis of
tick-borne diseases. These include in vitro laboratory studies, in vivo studies
of experimental and natural infections in animals, and patient studies based
on clinical trials and specimens from biopsies and autopsies. While no one
approach can represent the full spectrum and complexity of human disease,
OCR for page 1
4 CRITICAL RESEARCH NEEDS IN TICK-BORNE DISEASES
the ability to “reduce” or “control” the number of variables by using in vi-
tro and in vivo models allows more rapid and less equivocal determination
of key variables in disease progression—knowledge required to improve
prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of tick-borne disease in patients. This
session focused on the state of the science regarding the pathogenesis of
tick-borne infections—specifically those caused by pathogens in the genera
Anaplasma, Borrelia, Ehrlichia, and Rickettsia. Themes discussed included
the following:
• Research based on animal models for the testing of hypotheses
related to the clinical manifestations and severity of symptoms or
disease.
• The role of the immune response to tick-borne infection and its effect
on bacterial load and disease manifestations.
• New technologies in animal models that explore mechanisms of
pathogen persistence following antibiotic treatment.
• Translating research findings from the animal model to clinical
application.
DIAGNOSTICS AND DIAGNOSIS
Diagnostics and diagnosis, which are essential to improve outcomes
of tick-borne diseases, have different connotations. Diagnostics provide a
cluster of objective measures directed toward identifying the cause of a dis-
ease. After scientists discover the causative agent of an emerging infectious
disease, such as Borrelia burgdorferi or Ehrlichia chaffeensis, they develop,
evaluate, and refine diagnostic tests over time. Diagnosis, in contrast, rests
on a patient’s history and symptoms and observed physical and laboratory
findings in a particular epidemiologic context. Ultimately, accurate diagno-
sis requires knowledge of the epidemiology and clinical manifestations, as
well as specific and sensitive diagnostic tests. In this session, the presenters
explored the limitations of existing tests for Lyme borreliosis and other
tick-borne diseases, and they discussed promising new approaches to diag-
nostics that may improve the diagnosis of these diseases, and the challenges
and needs for improving initial diagnosis. Some themes discussed in this
session included
• The current status of diagnostic tests and biomarkers for TBDs.
• The role of central system sensitivity and fatigue and other sequelae
as possible biomarkers of TBDs.
• Measurement of qualitative symptoms reported by patients.
• Biorepositories for tick-borne diseases.
• Syndromic-based diagnostics for TBDs.
OCR for page 1
5
OVERVIEW
PREVENTION
Research efforts have been focused on ameliorating the symptoms and
consequences of tick-borne diseases through treatment. However, the devel-
opment, deployment, and evaluation of strategies to prevent the occurrence
of tick-borne diseases were also discussed as a high priority. Prevention
of infection is much more preferable to treating the short- and long-term
consequences of disease. In this session, the presentations addressed current
and future opportunities for vaccine development, the role and effective-
ness of behavior change, and vector-control strategies. A few of the themes
discussed in this session included
• Research and development of safe, effective, multipathogen human
and animal vaccines for tick-transmitted diseases.
• Land-use practices and public education as current tools to improve
mitigation and prevention of TBDs.
• Social and behavioral considerations for TBD prevention interventions.
• Educational programs for the public.
• Assessing the impact of educational programs for patients and
clinicians.
SUMMATION
The committee invited a panel of stakeholders to listen to the presen-
tations and discussions during the course of the 2-day workshop and to
share their observations regarding the research gaps and priorities in the
science of tick-borne diseases. The panel members were not asked to come
to a consensus but rather to express their individual viewpoints. The pan-
elists included a representative from a patient advocacy group, a clinician
specializing in Lyme disease, a clinician–scientist specializing in Ehrlichia
and Anaplasma, a clinician–scientist studying pathogenesis, and a Euro-
pean clinician–scientist who provided a global perspective. Following the
discussion, the committee invited participants to share their thoughts. A
few of the views presented during this session included perspectives on the
following:
• Research funding gaps for other TBDs.
• Contribution of a national integrated research plan for advancing
the science on TBDs.
• The merits of a long-term study of Lyme disease and other TBD
patients.
• The role of public–private partnerships and other collaborative ef-
forts to enhance the research on TBDs.
OCR for page 1