References

Côté, A.-M. and D. Laroche (2009). The Internet: A new collection method for the census. In Proceedings of Statistics Canada Symposium 2008—Data Collection: Challenges, Achievements and New Directions. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. Available: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-522-x/2008000/article/10986-eng.pdf [accessed December 17, 2010].

Groves, R. M. (2009, September 22). 2010 Census—Operational Assessment. Prepared statement before the Subcommittee on Information Policy, Census, and National Archives, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, U.S. House of Representatives: U.S. Census Bureau.

Holmes, A. (2008, January 2). Census program to use handheld computers said to be in ‘serious trouble’. Government Executive.com. Available: http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0108/010208h1.htm [accessed November 16, 2010].

Judson, D. H. and B. Bye (2003, October 21). Synthesis of Results from the Administrative Records Experiment in 2000 (AREX 2000). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

Kincannon, C. L. (2006, June 6). The 2010 decennial census program. Prepared statement, testimony before the Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, Government Information, and International Security of the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate.

MITRE Corporation (2007, January 17). An assessment of the risks, costs, and benefits of including the Internet as a response option in the 2010 decennial census. Version 2.0. Report prepared for the U.S. Census Bureau.

National Research Council (1995). Modernizing the U.S. Census. Panel on Census Requirements in the Year 2000 and Beyond, Barry Edmonston and Charles Schultze, eds., Committee on National Statistics, Commission of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.



The National Academies | 500 Fifth St. N.W. | Washington, D.C. 20001
Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
Terms of Use and Privacy Statement



Below are the first 10 and last 10 pages of uncorrected machine-read text (when available) of this chapter, followed by the top 30 algorithmically extracted key phrases from the chapter as a whole.
Intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text on the opening pages of each chapter. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

Do not use for reproduction, copying, pasting, or reading; exclusively for search engines.

OCR for page 29
References Côté, A.-M. and D. Laroche (2009). The Internet: A new collection method for the census. In Proceedings of Statistics Canada Symposium 2008—Data Collection: Challenges, Achievements and New Directions. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. Avail- able: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11-522-x/2008000/article/10986-eng.pdf [ac- cessed December 17, 2010]. Groves, R. M. (2009, September 22). 2010 Census—Operational Assessment. Pre- pared statement before the Subcommittee on Information Policy, Census, and Na- tional Archives, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, U.S. House of Representatives: U.S. Census Bureau. Holmes, A. (2008, January 2). Census program to use handheld computers said to be in ‘serious trouble’. Government Executive.com. Available: http://www.govexec. com/dailyfed/0108/010208h1.htm [accessed November 16, 2010]. Judson, D. H. and B. Bye (2003, October 21). Synthesis of Results from the Admin- istrative Records Experiment in 2000 (AREX 2000). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Kincannon, C. L. (2006, June 6). The 2010 decennial census program. Prepared statement, testimony before the Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, Government Information, and International Security of the Committee on Home- land Security and Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate. MITRE Corporation (2007, January 17). An assessment of the risks, costs, and ben- efits of including the Internet as a response option in the 2010 decennial census. Version 2.0. Report prepared for the U.S. Census Bureau. National Research Council (1995). Modernizing the U.S. Census. Panel on Cen- sus Requirements in the Year 2000 and Beyond, Barry Edmonston and Charles Schultze, eds., Committee on National Statistics, Commission of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 29

OCR for page 29
30 CHANGE AND THE 2020 CENSUS: NOT WHETHER BUT HOW National Research Council (2004a). The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Panel to Review the 2000 Census, Constance F. Citro, Daniel L. Cork, and Janet L. Norwood, eds., Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council (2004b). Reengineering the 2010 Census: Risks and Chal- lenges. Panel on Research on Future Census Methods, Daniel L. Cork, Michael L. Cohen, and Benjamin F. King, eds., Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council (2009). Coverage Measurement in the 2010 Census. Panel on Correlation Bias and Coverage Measurement in the 2010 Decennial Census, Robert M. Bell and Michael L. Cohen, eds., Committee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. National Research Council (2010). Envisioning the 2020 Census. Panel on the De- sign of the 2010 Census Program of Evaluations and Experiments, Lawrence D. Brown, Michael L. Cohen, Daniel L. Cork, and Constance F. Citro, eds. Commit- tee on National Statistics, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Educa- tion. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Statistics Canada (2008). Earnings and Incomes of Canadians Over the Past Quarter Century, 2006 Census. Catalogue no. 97-563-X. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. U.S. Census Bureau (1976). Procedural History PHC(R)-1, 1970 Census of Popula- tion and Housing. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. U.S. Census Bureau (2010, February). U.S. Census Bureau’s Budget Estimates, As Presented to Congress, February 2010: Fiscal Year 2011. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Inspector General (2006, March). U.S. Census Bureau—Census 2010: Revised Field Data Collection Automation Con- tract Incorporated OIG Recommendations, But Concerns Remain Over Fee Awarded During Negotiations. Final Report No. CAR-18702. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. U.S. Government Accountability Office (2007, July 17). 2010 Census: Preparations for 2010 Census Underway, But Continued Oversight and Risk Management Are Critical. Report GAO-07-1106T. Testimony of Mathew J. Scirè and David A. Powner before the Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, Government Information, Federal Services and International Security, Committee on Home- land Security and Government Affairs, U.S. Senate. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov- ernment Printing Office. U.S. Government Accountability Office (2008, July). 2010 Census: Census Bureau’s Decision to Continue with Handheld Computers for Address Canvassing Makes

OCR for page 29
REFERENCES 31 Planning and Testing Critical. Report GAO-08-936. Washington, DC: U.S. Gov- ernment Printing Office. U.S. Office of Management and Budget (2010). Strengthening federal statistics. In Analytical Perspectives, Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2011, Chapter 18, pp. 315–319. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

OCR for page 29