National Academies Press: OpenBook

Ethical and Scientific Issues in Studying the Safety of Approved Drugs (2012)

Chapter: Appendix A: Other Elements of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act

« Previous: 5 Synthesis
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Other Elements of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act." Institute of Medicine. 2012. Ethical and Scientific Issues in Studying the Safety of Approved Drugs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13219.
×

A

Other Elements of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act

Chapter 1 discusses three sections of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act (FDAAA) of 20071 that are integral to the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) ability to take a lifecycle approach to drug oversight: the authority to require postmarketing studies; the authority to require risk evaluation and mitigation strategies; and the requirement to develop a large-scale active surveillance system. This appendix discusses additional sections of FDAAA that improve FDA’s ability to oversee drugs in the postmarketing setting: increased authority to enforce submission of clinical-trial registry and database information; increased authority over the contents of direct-to-consumer advertising; increased authority to order labeling and warning changes in a timely manner; increased resources directed toward identifying and mitigating drug risks both premarketing and postmarketing; and increased requirements for agency transparency and risk communication. Those five elements are described briefly below.

CONTENTS OF ClinicalTrials.gov

ClinicalTrials.gov is a clinical-trial registry and database website that is supported and housed by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and provides public access to information regarding clinical trials. ClinicalTrials.gov was initially mandated by the FDA Modernization Act of 1997,2 and required that clinical trials for effectiveness conducted under an investigational new drug application (IND) for “serious or life threatening diseases” must be registered in

image

1Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007, PL 110-85, 121 Stat. 823 (2007).

2Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act of 1997, PL 105-115, 111 Stat. 2296 (1997).

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Other Elements of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act." Institute of Medicine. 2012. Ethical and Scientific Issues in Studying the Safety of Approved Drugs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13219.
×

ClinicalTrials.gov; there was no enforcement capability to ensure that privately funded trials were included, and study results were not included in the database.3 FDAAA expanded the requirements for registration of clinical trials to include all trials beyond Phase 1 that are parts of new drug applications,4 required the reporting of results of those trials,5 and gave FDA the ability to enforce registration by allowing penalties if drug sponsors failed to comply with submission of information to ClinicalTrials.gov.6 The statute directs NIH to ensure that the information submitted is truthful and not misleading.7 Sponsors must submit any changes in the information to NIH. FDAAA also increased FDA’s regulatory responsibility for the form of and methods for reporting serious adverse events in ClinicalTrials.gov.8

CONTENTS OF DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER ADVERTISING

FDAAA provides FDA with the authority to require that direct-to-consumer radio and television advertisements include a “major statement relating to side effects and contraindications” of the drug and that the “major statement” be “presented in a clear, conspicuous, and neutral manner”.9 FDAAA stipulates that in the absence of such a statement, FDA can determine that the advertisement is “false or misleading”,10 and establishes civil penalties for dissemination of such advertisements.11

On March 29, 2010, FDA published in the Federal Register the following proposed standards for evaluating a “major statement”:

•  Information is presented in language that is readily understandable by consumers.

•  Audio information is understandable in terms of the volume, articulation, and pacing used.

•  Textual information is placed appropriately and is presented against a contrasting background for sufficient duration and in a size and font style that can be read easily; and there are no distractions—such as statements, text, images or sounds—that detract from the communication of the major statement.12

image

342 USC § 282(i) (2010).

442 USC § 282(j)(1)(A) (2010).

542 USC § 282(j)(3) (2010).

642 USC § 282(j)(5)(E) (2010).

742 USC § 282(j)(5)(D) (2010).

842 USC § 282(j)(3)(I) (2010).

921 USC § 352(n) (2010).

1021 USC § 352(q) (2010).

1121 USC § 352(r) (2010).

12Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Advertisements; Presentation of the Major Statement in Television and Radio Advertisements in a Clear, Conspicuous, and Neutral Manner, 75 Fed. Reg. 15376-15387 (March 29, 2010) (amending 20 CFR § 202.1).

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Other Elements of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act." Institute of Medicine. 2012. Ethical and Scientific Issues in Studying the Safety of Approved Drugs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13219.
×

Final standards for evaluating a major statement are not yet published.

Under FDAAA, FDA also has the authority to require a company to disclose a drug’s approval date for up to 2 years after a drug is approved if it “determines that [an] advertisement would otherwise be false or misleading”.13 FDA has declined to require an indication that a drug is new out of concern that “new” will be wrongly interpreted by consumers to imply “new and improved” (FDA, 2009a).

LABEL AND WARNING CHANGES

Before the passage of FDAAA, FDA could not require a drug manufacturer to change a label even if FDA became aware of new safety information about a marketed drug. FDA negotiated with the manufacturer about the language of the label, and its recourse was to use a claim of “misbranding” to revoke, or threaten to revoke, approval if a company was not willing to change a drug’s label (Carpenter, 2010). Under FDAAA, FDA can require changes in the label of a drug to reflect new information about its benefit–risk profile. Those changes can include “boxed warnings, contraindications, warnings, precautions, or adverse reactions”.14

INCREASED RESOURCES FOR DRUG SAFETY

In addition to increasing FDA’s postmarketing responsibility and authority, FDAAA specifies that user fees will be “dedicated toward expediting the drug development process and the process for the review of human drug applications, including postmarketing drug safety activities”.15 Much of the funding comes from a specific authorization of $225 million over 5 years for “drug safety”.16 The funds are being used by the Center for Drug Evaluation and Review (CDER) and others in FDA to increase the number of staff dedicated to the safety evaluation of marketed medications and to administer CDER’s new safety-related authority under FDAAA, including the implementation of REMSs, postmarketing requirements (PMRs), safety-related labeling changes, and active postmarketing risk identification (such as Sentinel) (FDA, 2009b).

TRANSPARENCY AND COMMUNICATION

FDAAA requires FDA to improve the availability and transparency of information about the drug-approval process, approved drugs, and, in particular, drug

image

1321 USC § 353b(e) (2010).

1421 USC § 355(o)(4)(B) (2010).

1521 USC § 379g note (2010).

1621 USC § 379h(b)(4)(B) (2010).

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Other Elements of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act." Institute of Medicine. 2012. Ethical and Scientific Issues in Studying the Safety of Approved Drugs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13219.
×

safety. To that end, the website MedWatch: The FDA Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting Program (http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch) now includes information on new package inserts and labels, recent safety information and alerts, quarterly reports on potential safety issues identified by using the Adverse Event Reporting System database, and links to other FDA-approved safety information. FDA has recently taken advantage of new technology by making electronic subscriptions available to MedWatch via e-newsletters, safety alerts, and Twitter (FDA, 2012).

Under FDAAA, FDA is also required to include on its website the approval package, which contains FDA staff reviews of a drug with proprietary information redacted, for any new molecular entity. For drugs that are not new molecular entities, it is required to provide the same material upon request. That approval information is now posted for each drug on FDA’s website at Drugs@FDA.17 As suggested in the 2007 Institute of Medicine report, FDAAA called for FDA to form an Advisory Committee on Risk Communication,18 which was established in 2008. The role of the advisory committee is to improve how information on drugs and drug safety is communicated to health care professionals and the public.19

REFERENCES

Carpenter, D. 2010. The other side of the gate: Reputation, power, and post-market regulation. In Reputation and power. Organizational image and pharmaceutical regulation at the FDA. Cambridge, NY: Princeton University Press.

FDA (US Food and Drug Administration). 2009a. IOM recommendations: FDA actions update. http://www.fda.gov/Safety/SafetyofSpecificProducts/ucm184598.htm (accessed March 20, 2012).

FDA. 2009b. FDAAA implementation—highlights two years after enactment. http://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Legislation/FederalFoodDrugandCosmeticActFDCAct/SignificantAmendmentstotheFDCAct/FoodandDrugAdministrationAmendmentsActof2007/ucm184271.htm (accessed March 20, 2012).

FDA. 2012. MedWatch: The FDA safety information and adverse event reporting program. http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch (accessed August 17, 2011).

image

17Drugs@FDA is located at http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/drugsatfda (accessed on February 13, 2012).

1821 USC § 360bbb–6 (2010).

1921 USC § 355(r)(6) (2010).

Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Other Elements of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act." Institute of Medicine. 2012. Ethical and Scientific Issues in Studying the Safety of Approved Drugs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13219.
×
Page 227
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Other Elements of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act." Institute of Medicine. 2012. Ethical and Scientific Issues in Studying the Safety of Approved Drugs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13219.
×
Page 228
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Other Elements of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act." Institute of Medicine. 2012. Ethical and Scientific Issues in Studying the Safety of Approved Drugs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13219.
×
Page 229
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Other Elements of the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act." Institute of Medicine. 2012. Ethical and Scientific Issues in Studying the Safety of Approved Drugs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13219.
×
Page 230
Next: Appendix B: Committee's Letter Report »
Ethical and Scientific Issues in Studying the Safety of Approved Drugs Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $55.00 Buy Ebook | $44.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

An estimated 48 percent of the population takes at least one prescription drug in a given month. Drugs provide great benefits to society by saving or improving lives. Many drugs are also associated with side effects or adverse events, some serious and some discovered only after the drug is on the market. The discovery of new adverse events in the postmarketing setting is part of the normal natural history of approved drugs, and timely identification and warning about drug risks are central to the mission of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Not all risks associated with a drug are known at the time of approval, because safety data are collected from studies that involve a relatively small number of human subjects during a relatively short period.

Written in response to a request by the FDA, Ethical and Scientific Issues in Studying the Safety of Approved Drugs discusses ethical and informed consent issues in conducting studies in the postmarketing setting. It evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of various approaches to generate evidence about safety questions, and makes recommendations for appropriate followup studies and randomized clinical trials. The book provides guidance to the FDA on how it should factor in different kinds of evidence in its regulatory decisions.

Ethical and Scientific Issues in Studying the Safety of Approved Drugs will be of interest to the pharmaceutical industry, patient advocates, researchers, and consumer groups.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!